See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/40542918

Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria

Article in Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering · July 2009
Source: DOAJ

CITATIONS READS

636 6,493

1 author:

Toochukwu Chibueze Ogwueleka

University of Abuja
36 PUBLICATIONS 1,235 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Toochukwu Chibueze Ogwueleka on 20 January 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 2009, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 173-180

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CHARACTERISTICS

AND MANAGEMENT IN NIGERIA

T. Ch. Ogwueleka

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria

Received 16 November 2008; revised 10 May 2009; accepted 15 July 2009

ABSTRACT
Municipal solid waste management has emerged as one of the greatest challenges facing environmental protection
agencies in developing countries. This study presents the current solid waste management practices and problems
in Nigeria. Solid waste management is characterized by inefficient collection methods, insufficient coverage of
the collection system and improper disposal. The waste density ranged from 280 to 370 kg/m3 and the waste
generation rates ranged from 0.44 to 0.66 kg/capita/day. The common constraints faced environmental agencies
include lack of institutional arrangement, insufficient financial resources, absence of bylaws and standards,
inflexible work schedules, insufficient information on quantity and composition of waste, and inappropriate
technology. The study suggested study of institutional, political, social, financial, economic and technical aspects
of municipal solid waste management in order to achieve sustainable and effective solid waste management in
Nigeria.

Keywords: Waste disposal, Waste Collection, Municipal solid waste, Nigeria, Recycling, Waste Management

INTRODUCTION
Nigeria is located in Western Africa on the
Gulf of Guinea. The country land borders with
the Republic of Benin in the West, Chad and
Cameroon in the East, and Niger in the north and
has a coastline of at least 853km. Nigeria has a
varied landscape, from the Obudu Hills in the
southeast through the beaches in the south, the
rainforest, the Lagos estuary and savannah in
the middle and south west of the country and the
sahel to the encroaching Sahara in the extreme
north. The country has two main rivers: Niger and
Benue. The two rivers converge and empty into
the Niger Delta, the world’s largest river delta.
Nigeria is a developing country, with a land area
of 923,768 km2, and a population of about 140
million with growth rate of 2.38. Nigeria is the
most populous country in Africa and ninth most
populous country in the world. With populations
distributed at 48.3% urban and 57.7% rural and
population density at 139 people per square km.
The country has GDP per capita of $1,800 and
population below poverty line is 60%. Nigeria
has a labour force of 50.13 million. The country
*Corresponding author: ogwueleka@yahoo.co.uk
Tel: +08035061048
comprises thirty-six states and one Federal Capital
Territory, which were further subdivided, into
774 Local Government Areas. Life expectancy is
47 years (average male/female). The government
provides education free at primary school level.
68% of the population are literate and the rate of
men (75.7%) is higher than for women (60.9%).
The climate is equatorial in south, tropical in
centre and arid in north. 33.02% of the land is
arable.
The Federal Government of Nigeria has
promulgated various laws and regulations to
safeguard the environment. These include Federal
Environmental Protection Agency Act of 1988.
The Federal Ministry of Environment administers
and enforces environmental laws in Nigeria. It
took over this function in 1999 from the Federal
Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA), which
was created under the FEPA Act.
Pursuant to the FEPA Act, each state and local
government in the country set up its own
environmental protection body for the protection
and improvement of the environment within its
jurisdiction. Municipal solid waste management
is a major responsibility of state and local

173
 T. Ch. Ogwueleka, MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CHARACTERISTICS...
government environmental agencies. The
agencies are charged with the responsibility of
handling, employing and disposing of solid waste
generated. The state agencies generate fund from
subvention from state governments and internally
generated revenue through sanitary levy and
stringent regulations with heavy penalties for
offenders of illegal dumping and littering of
refuse along streets (Ogwueleka, 2003).
Municipal solid waste management(MSWM)
Municipal solid waste (MSW) is defined to
include refuse from households, non-hazardous
solid waste from industrial, commercial and
institutional establishments (including hospitals),
market waste, yard waste, and street sweepings.
Municipal solid waste management (MSWM)
refers to the collection, transfer, treatment,
recycling, resources recovery and disposal of solid
waste in urban areas. The goals of municipal solid
waste management are to promote the quality of
the urban environment, generate employment
and income, and protect environmental health
and support the efficiency and productivity of the
economy.
Solid waste management has emerged as one
of the greatest challenges facing state and local
government environmental protection agencies
in Nigeria. The volume of solid waste being
generated continues to increase at a faster rate
than the ability of the agencies to improve on
the financial and technical resources needed to
parallel this growth. Solid waste management in
Nigeria is characterized by inefficient collection
methods, insufficient coverage of the collection
system and improper disposal of solid waste.
The quantity of solid waste generated in urban
areas in industrialized countries is higher than in
developing countries; still municipal solid waste
management remains inadequate in the latter.
Solid waste in developing countries differs from
developed countries. Most developing countries,
Nigeria, inclusive have solid waste management
problems different from those found in
industrialized countries in areas of composition,
density, political, and economic framework,
waste amount, access to waste for collection,
awareness and attitude. The wastes are heavier,
wetter and more corrosive in developing cities
than developed cities.
In developing countries, local authorities spend
174
77-95% of their revenue on collection and the
balance on disposal (Ogwueleka, 2003), but
can only collect almost 50-70% of municipal
solid waste (MSW). In the past, the focus has
been on the technical aspects of different means
of collection and disposal(World Bank, 1992),
but recently, attention has been on enhancing
institutional arrangement to service delivery, with
a special emphasis on privatization (Cointreau,
1994). Nigeria is presently experimenting with
the privatization of this sector. The Federal
Government has instituted National Integrated
Municipal Solid Waste Management Intervention
Programme in seven cities of Nigeria. The seven
cities are Maiduguri, Kano, Kaduna, Onitsha,
Uyo, Ota, and Lagos. Lagos state government
established municipal solid waste management
policy to encompass private sector participation
in waste collection and transfer to designated
landfill sites.
This paper aims to examine current solid waste
management practices and problems in Nigeria.
The specific aims are the following:
-to present the current state of municipal solid
waste in Nigeria, and the challenges it faces.
-to document solid waste problems in Nigeria.
-to recommend and discuss applicable solutions
to the solid waste management system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this study, nine cities namely Lagos, Maiduguri,
Kano, Ibadan, Makurdi, Port-Harcourt, Onitsha,
Nsukka, Abuja were chosen as urbanistic
representatives of the current solid waste
management in Nigeria. The selection of the
municipalities is based on the existing situation
with different waste management problems,
size, and challenges. Lagos is the former capital
of Nigeria and the largest city in Nigeria. Abuja
is the capital city of Nigeria. Kano, Onitsha
and Port-Harcourt are commercial cities while
Makurdi is the capital city of Benue State in the
middle belt regions of Nigeria. Ibadan is one of
the major urban centres. Maiduguri metropolis
has been an administrative, cultural and religious
centre. The locations are given in Fig. 1. The
study was undertaken from April to October,
2007 and carried out in three steps.
Step 1: Documents, records and academic
 Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 2009, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 173-180
Fig. 1: Map of Nigeria
literature relating to municipal solid waste
management in
Nigeria were studied.
Step 2: Thirty six (36) state environmental
agencies workers involved in municipal solid
waste
management were interviewed to update
information in the document and records
collected.
Step 3: Twenty dump sites were visited at
Abuja, Makurdi, Lagos, Nsukka, Onitsha, Port-
Harcourt,
Kano. Also the residents, scavengers, private
contractors were interviewed to confirm the
collection, disposal and treatment procedures,
recycling practice and problems facing solid
waste management.
RESULTS
Waste collection and transportation in Nigeria
The collection of solid waste is the function
of state and local government environmental
protection agencies. Informal solid waste
collection operations exist in parallel with official
agencies in some major cities like Onitsha, Lagos
etc. Informal collectors provide the service for
a fee. In most urban areas, stationary containers
system is adopted for waste collection; the waste
containers remain at the points of waste generation.
This method requires the delivery of waste by the
residents to a storage container. These confiners
are generally at open spaces along street ends or
junctions. These confiners are placed 500-800 m
apart. The some bins are fixed on the ground and
some are movable. The agencies find this system
less convenient and less expensive than house-
to-house service. House-to-house service is very
rare in Nigeria.
Different types of vehicles are used for solid waste
collection in Nigeria. The compactor trucks, side
loaders, rear loaders, mini trucks, tippers, skip
trucks and open back trucks are the commonly
used collection trucks. It was observed that
60% percent of trucks available are always out
of service at any one time. In Onitsha, the few
available trucks breakdown frequently due to
overuse (Agunwamba et al, 2003). The collection
vehicles are in a state of disrepair in most cities
of Nigeria. There is inadequate service coverage
in most urban areas and in rural areas there is
no collection. Rural dwellers have no access to
waste collection service. They dump waste at any
vacant plot, public space, and river or burn it in
their backyard, thereby polluting the air. Less
than 60% of (MSW) generated is collected in
developing countries (Ogwueleka, 2003). Solid
waste generation exceeds collection capacity.
Zurbrugg (2003) describes that one to two thirds
of the solid waste generation in developing
countries is not collected. There is no regular
175
 T. Ch. Ogwueleka, MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CHARACTERISTICS...

routine collection. 1991, there were twenty-five registered private

Currently, transfer stations are not common in waste collectors but only ten were found to be
Nigeria. There are cases where such were once in operational (Onibokun, 1999). The solid waste
existence but are not longer functional. In Abuja, collection efficiency in Nigeria ranged from 5
the land earmarked for waste transfer station has percent in some semi-urban areas to 50 percent
been converted to other land use. In Nigeria, in urban areas.
municipal solid waste is collected and taken
by collection vehicles directly to the disposal Waste characteristics
site. The waste accumulates in open dumps at The waste generation rates ranged from 0.66
roadsides. The open dumps provide harbourage kg/cap/d in urban areas to 0.44 kg/cap/d in
for diseases causing organisms, bacteria, insects, rural areas as opposed to 0.7-1.8 kg/cap/day
and rodents. in developed countries (Cointreau, 1982). The
Local agencies do not have adequate capacity to waste generation rate is typical of low income
handle the increasing solid waste mainly due to towns. The rate of waste generation is highly
limited budgets. In most urban areas of Nigeria, the influenced by the population income. In Nigeria
collection of fees and refuse are subcontracted to 25 million tonnes of municipal solid waste are
private companies, which have higher efficiency generated annually. Table 1 shows the waste
than government agencies. The current interest generation rates and breakdown density for
involving private companies in solid waste is urban and rural areas in Nigeria. Waste densities
driven by failure of government agencies to and moisture are much higher in developing
provide adequate services. Private participation countries which require different technology and
in waste management has not been successful management systems (Cointreau et al., 1984).
in Nigeria because such companies are profit The density of solid waste in Nigeria ranged from
driven and they are not monitored or regulated 250 kg/m3 to 370 kg/m3 higher than solid waste
by government. Also due to the unprofitable densities found in developed countries. Density
nature of solid waste business, inefficiency and defines the number of capacity of waste storage
dishonesty on the part of some of the contractors and collection facilities required. High density
and late payment of contractors by the agencies reduces the effectiveness of compaction vehicles
worsen the situation. For example, in Ibadan in for waste transfer.
Table 1: Urban solid waste generation
 
   
 
      
     
      
     
      
     
      
      
     
Source: All Sites Engineering Ltd

The composition of waste

Income and economic growth have impact on
the composition of wastes. High-income earners
consume more packaged products, which result
in a higher percentage of inorganic materials
– metals, plastics, glass, and textile. Waste
characteristics vary according to season, income
level, population, social behaviour, climate, and
industrial production, the size of markets for
waste materials and the extent of urbanization,
effectiveness of recycling, and work reduction.
Because of non-uniformity of collection
methods, the environmental agencies do not
provide separate solid waste management for the
six classification of solid waste. The majority
of substances composing municipal solid
waste include paper, vegetable matter, plastics,

176
 Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 2009, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 173-180

metals, textile, rubber and glass. Table 2 shows In developing countries, waste stream is over
a comparative analysis of municipal solid waste 50% organic material (Hoornweg et al., 1999).
composition in some major cities in Nigeria. It Studies in Bandung, Indonesia and Colombia, Sri
can be seen that great majority of the total solid Lanka have found residential waste composed of
waste generated in Nigeria is organic. The high 78% and 81% compostable material, and market
level of reuse of recyclable waste reflects the waste 89% and 90% compostable, respectively
extent of poverty in the developing countries. (Cointreau, 1982).
Table 2: Composition of waste stream characteristics
      
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
Others = dust, ash, ceramics, rubber, soil, bones
α
Diaz and Golueke (1985) , β Ogwueleka (2003) , ± Ogwueleka (2006), ¥ Agunwamba et al (1998), µ Cointreau (1982), # Dauda and Osita (2003)

Resource recovery and recycling

There are no formal recycling of resource recovery
programmes in Nigeria (Ogwueleka, 2003) and
no policy on composting. Currently, recovery/
recycling operations are carried out mostly by
the informal sector. In most big markets, the
scavengers pack refuse for a fee and salvage any
recyclable prior to the disposal of the waste. 60%
of wastes collected in Nigeria are organic waste
and only 8% are recovered for reuse.
Recycling is a method of solid waste
management like controlling or incineration, but
is environmentally more desirable (Ruzi, 2001).
Recycling can help the economy by recovering
and reusing valuable materials. Recycling
reduces the amount of waste need to be collected,
transported and disposed of, and extends the
life of disposal facilities, which saves money
to the agency. Waste recycling and composting
activities should be encouraged since this
approach is considered to be the right measure
in attaining sustainability in waste management.
Efficient recycling and composting could save
18.6% in waste management costs and 57.7%
in landfill cost (Agunwamba, 1998). In Onitsha,
40% of artisans and small-scale industries receive
48% of their raw materials from scavengers. The
role of the informal sector in waste collection
is significant. This sector is responsible for
removing 30 percent of total generated waste in
the urban areas.
Majority of the scavengers are between 17 and 30
old years. They operate without proper protective
wares. Scavengers are driven by poverty and
desire to earn a living. The informal private sector
comprises unregistered, unregulated activities
carried out by individuals, families, group or
small enterprises. The sector is labour intensive.
This sector provides employment opportunities
for a large group of people. Scavenging and
recycling should be encouraged. The stakeholders
are consumers/scavengers, middlemen, and
manufacturers. The contributions of each
stakeholder in the recycling process need to be
evaluated. The official population of scavengers
has not been known.
The informal collectors use pushcarts, barrow etc.
These collectors provide service in areas where
the agencies cannot. In some public places and
markets, people pay scavengers to clean the front
of their shops. Scavengers salvage repairable
and rentable materials to sell for recycling. In
Nigeria, scavengers are seen as menace. Materials
recovery facilities (MRFs) are used as dump sites
at Uwani in Enugu and Lagos.
Treatment and disposal system
In Nigeria like most developing countries,
wastes are commonly dumped in open dumps,
uncontrolled landfills where a waste collection
service is organised. Dumps are located along or
beside major roads. In Makurdi, Benue State, the
dump site is 2 km away from the city along Naka
road. In Onitsha, refuse spreads into the road,
blocking traffic and the wastes are burnt open on

177
 T. Ch. Ogwueleka, MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CHARACTERISTICS...
the side of the road.
Open dumping of waste cannot be considered as
a long-term environmental method of disposal.
The dangers of open dumping are many; health
hazard to scavengers at the dump site, pollution of
ground water, spread of infectious diseases, highly
toxic smoke from continuously smouldering fires
and foul odours from decomposing refuse.
Eight landfills exist in Lagos State. In Abuja,
the present controlled dumpsite is along outer
northern expressway, (ONEX). There is no tipping
fee. Waste can be disposed in several ways but
sanitary landfill is the only land disposal options
that enable control and effective mitigation of
extreme emission and of surface and groundwater
contamination. Sanitary landfill requires much
greater initial investment and hence higher
operating costs than controlled dumps. Sanitary
landfill technologies were introduced in Lagos
and Onitsha two decades ago. But presently the
landfills are not operational. Open dumping is
the most common practice. There is no landfill
regulation or standard that provides a basis for
compliance and monitoring. Wastes in open
dumps are set on fires in order to reduce the
volume of the wastes.
Incineration is the high temperature combustion of
wastes. Incineration and waste to energy (WTE)
is not practiced in Nigeria except in the hospitals
where medical wastes are incinerated at a small
scale. Construction and start up maintenance
costs of incineration facilities are too expensive
for developing countries. Incineration requires
strict control of toxic fumes and disposal of
toxic residues (ash) in sanitary landfill. Three
incinerators build in Lagos in 1979 were never
used. Two of them were dismantled in 1989 and
the third was converted into a civic centre. The
failure of these incinerators demonstrated that
incinerators are not sustainable. The waste in
developing countries contains so much moisture
that fuel has to be added to maintain combustion.
Low calorific value and low combustible
components of solid waste in Nigeria make
incineration uneconomical (Ogwueleka, 2003).
This suggests that composting could be a very
viable recovery alternative.
In rural areas, food from households is feed to
animals, some are home composted and used to
178
condition the soil. The waste could be converted to
compost or used to generate biogas. Composted
material could be used as fertilizer. Composting
programme does not exist in Nigeria but there
are back yard composting efforts in Nigeria.
Composting is the process of aerobic biological
decomposition of organic materials under
controlled condition of temperature, humidity and
pH. Windrow composting is the least expensive
and can be most appropriate to the socio-economic
and climatic conditions in developing countries.
International Non-Governmental Organisations
(NGOs) have sponsored small scale composting
in Nigeria but the practice has not had significant
impact in Nigeria (UNEP-IETC, 1996).
DISCUSSION
Waste management constraints and problems
facing local agencies
Poor funding is one of the main reasons for
poor collection and disposal of refuse. Lack of
funds has forced most environmental protection
agencies in the country to hire vehicles and
maintain few staff on a permanent basis (ESESA,
1998). The waste management fee is insufficient
to cover for waste management. Environmental
agencies do not have adequate capacity to handle
the increasing solid waste mainly due to limited
budgets. Low morale of environmental protection
agencies workers due to poor remuneration
and stagnation in promotion also affect solid
waste management. In Anambra State in 2002-
2003, Anambra State Environmental Protection
Agency staff salaries were withheld for 18
months. Environmental protection agencies are
understaffed and adequately staffed with poorly
trained workers. The agencies are faced with
financial difficulties in meeting the large payment
of wages. Hardly a year goes by without threats
of strikes by workers demanding past due wages.
Late approval of budgets by the parent ministry
has also resulted in cash flow problems. In some
cities revenue from solid waste management
collections are simply rolled into the general
treasury, as opposed to returning to waste
related operations and cumbersome procurement
procedures.
Inappropriate sitting, design, operations and
maintenance of dumps and landfills have
 Iran. J. Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 2009, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 173-180
increased transfer and disposal cost and also
inadequate onsite storage facilities.
Lack of institutional arrangement: lack of
expertise and manpower to run solid waste
management programme in Nigeria. Majority
of environmental agency workers have little
or no functional background or training in
engineering and management, so the operations
result in ineffective and inefficient solid waste
management. There is no reliable measurement
of generated waste. Non-appreciation of the
magnitude of the waste management is a problem.
The role of the informal sector has not been
recognised by environmental agencies.
The cities networks, traffic congestion and
narrow roads contribute to the inefficient waste
collection in Onitsha, Lagos, Benin etc. In Onitsha
and Lagos collection vehicles spend three to four
hours per day collecting waste, typically making
two trips to the disposal sites. Harsh condition
of roads and infrastructures has led to constant
break down of the collection trucks. In Nigeria,
slums and squatter areas appear in the poor
neighbourhood of most cities with narrow, hilly,
bad and unpaved streets. This makes it impossible
for environmental agencies to service the areas.
Where it does, it damages the vehicles.
Non-rational routes for collection services are
problems. Solid waste collection vehicles are
assigned to districts without any serious waste
analysis, route selection is left for drivers. In
most cities in Nigeria, solid waste collection is
done in an adhoc manner, which contributes to
high solid waste collection cost and the crippling
fuel crisis. The vehicles are not full on some trips
to the disposal site.
Failure to optimize collection vehicle productivity
by selecting crew size and shift direction
contributes to high collection cost. In developed
countries, the labour cost is cheap compared
to the cost of equipment. The developing
countries need low capital cost and high labour
intensive. Nigeria has abundance of unskilled
and inexpensive labour. In Makurdi optimizing
crew size resulted in cost saving of 32.69% of the
collection cost (Ogwueleka, 2004).
In most cities of Nigeria, compaction trucks are
used. These trucks are uncommon, expensive and
difficult to repair. Maintenance of uncommon
equipment is always difficult. Compactor trucks
are designed to handle low density waste. Solid
wastes in developing countries like Nigeria
contain large organic matter and high density
which makes compaction unnecessary. This is
insufficient information about the quantities and
quality of the waste generated within their areas.
The waste component weight will affect the size
of the equipment, and the quantity of energy to
be produced.
The vehicles are obsolete and too expensive to
operate and maintain. The containers are old and
too few. For example, Borno State Environmental
Protection Agency (BOSEPA) has a total of nine
vehicles in Maiduguri, seven tippers, one loader
and one gully emptier, out of which only four
tippers and one loader are functioning (Dauda
and Osita, 2000).
Strategies towards improvement of MSWM
The common approaches to municipal solid
waste management used by development
agencies and international donor agencies often
fail in developing countries inclusive of Nigeria.
The conventional approaches usually involve
solutions that are centralized and undiversified
do not distinguish the different needs and
heterogeneity of city. They are bureaucratic that
only consider the formal sector, ignoring informal
sector. They are capital intensive approaches
involving advanced technology and equipment.
Most developing countries, Nigeria inclusive
have solid waste management problems different
from those found in developed countries in areas
of composition, density, political and economic
framework, and in waste amount, access to waste
for collection, awareness and attitudes, so a
different approach is needed. The socioeconomic
conditions in the third world are so different from
those of the developed world, that a different
approach is needed. To achieve sustainable
and effective waste management there is need
to consider the political, institutional, social,
financial, economic and technical aspects of
MSWM in Nigeria.
Developed countries enjoy a relative abundance
of capital and have high labour cost while
developing countries like Nigeria have a
relative scarcity of capital and an abundance of
179
 T. Ch. Ogwueleka, MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CHARACTERISTICS...
unskilled and inexpensive labour. So any waste
management systems with intensive in capital
that save in labour cost does not make sense to
us. Nigeria needs low capital cost and labour
intensive solutions that reduce poverty.
The physical characteristics of cities in Nigeria
and developed countries differ. Nigeria has
narrow, unpaved streets which cause collection
vehicles break down due to the harsh conditions.
In these areas pushcarts, tricycles, donkey carts,
horse carts and pickup trucks can be used. Nigeria
has a dynamic informal sector that has evolved
around wastes. Informal waste collectors can be
incorporated into public-private partnership.
The utilization of compactor trucks in Nigeria
cannot be justified in most cases. Compactor
trucks are equipped with a compactor mechanism
to increase the density of the waste and thus
minimize the number of collection trips. It has
sensitive hydraulic mechanisms which can
breakdown when an attempt is made to compact
waste that is already dense. Compactor trucks
were designed for low density waste. Wastes in
Nigeria are high density, do not need compaction.
Compactor trucks have high capital cost- high
fuel usage and operating cost. Regular trucks
should be used for waste collection. It requires
less capital investment and easy maintaining.
There is need to train the waste personnel to
management solid waste issues: formulate the
policy for community based programme, waste
reduction and recycling project; preparation of
legislation. Replacement of the existing vehicles
with modern equipment will reduce operating
costs. Measurement stations should be installed in
some of the landfills. Construction of new transfer
station will reduce operating cost. Community
participation and involvement of community
based organisations in waste management.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I acknowledge the assistance of staff of Federal
Ministry of Environment and state agencies in
preparing this paper.
REFERENCES
Agunwamba, J. C., (1998). Analysis of scavengers’
activities and recycling in some cities of Nigeria.
Environmental Management, 32 (1): 116-127.
180
View publication stats
Agunwamba, J.C., Egbuniwe, N., Ogwueleka, T.C.,
(2003). Least cost management of solid waste
collection. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and
Management, 29 (3): 154-167.
Cointreau, S. J., (1982). Environmental management
of urban solid waste in developing countries: a
project guide. Urban Development Technical paper
No 5. The World Bank, Washington, DC. June .
Cointreau-Levine, S., (1994). Private sector
participation in municipal solid waste management
service in developing countries. Vol. 1. The formal
sector-UNDP/UNCHS/ The World Bank-Urban
Management Programme. 52 pp.
Cointreau, S.J., Gunnerson, C.G., Huls, J. M., and
Seldman, N.N.,(1984). Recycling from municipal
refuse: A state of the Art Review and Annotated
Bibliography, World Bank Technical paqper N0 30.
The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Dauda, M., And Osita, O.O.,(2003). Solid waste
management and reuse in Maiduguri, Nigeria.
29th WEDC International Conference towards the
Millennium Development Goal, Abuja.
ESESA (Enugu State Environment Sanitation Agency),
(1998), ESESA Report, 1998.
Hoornweg, D., Thomas, L., and Otten, L., (1999).
Composting and its applicability in developing
countries. Urban waste management working paper
series 8. Washington, DC; World Bank.
Ogwueleka, T.C., (2003). Analysis of urban solid
waste in Nsukka, Nigeria. Journal of Solid Waste
Technology and Management, 29 (4): 239-246.
Ogwueleka ,T.C., (2004). Planning model for refuse
management. Journal of Science and Technology, 3
(2) :71-76.
Onibokun, A.G., (1999). Managing the monsters:
urban waste and governance in Africa. International
Development Research Centre, Ottawa.
Ruzi Jr, J.A., (2001). Recycling overview and growth.
In Lund H.F. (ed.): The McGraw Hill Recycling
Handbook, Chapter 1, McGraw Hill Inc, New York.
UNEP-IETC, (1996). International Source Book
on Environmentally Sound Technologies for
Municipal Solid Management. Osaka/Shiga, UNEP
International Environmental Technology Centre.
World Bank, (1992). World Development Report,
Development and Environment, New York. Paper
No 13.
Zurbrugg, C., (2003). Urban solid waste management
in low-income countries of Asia, How to cope with
the Garbage crisis, Available in the website: http;//
www.sandec.ch.