Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The research was conducted to survey experiences in the creative space at Vinpearl Phu Quoc
based on SPSS (Statistical Product and Services Solutions) statistical software, and quantitative
and qualitative variables through consumer experiences.
The results show that the scale includes 5 main components that have the highest influence on
tourist satisfaction: Traveling, Shopping, Gaming, Restaurant, and VR (Virtual Reality).
Furthermore, the report also analyzes factors that affect the tourist experience at Vinpearl Phu
Quoc compared to other entertainment tourist areas. Vinpearl Phu Quoc has been evaluated as a
luxury 5-star resort paradise and is the choice of entertainment destination for many tourists from
everywhere. Vinpearl Phu Quoc is an entertainment area that combines many services in one
creative environmental space such as Water Park, Aquarium, Food Street, Night Market, and
Vinpearl Safari. Vinpearl Land system includes 4 entertainment areas and 1 Safari wildlife
conservation area across the country. This proves Vinpearl Land's success in understanding the
need for entertainment everywhere in Vietnam.
This research report provides valuable insights into the Creative Atmosphere when participating
in and experiencing Vinpearl Phu Quoc. The report ends with recommendations for Vinpearl on
strategies to enhance the tourists’ experience and comprehensively upgrade the resort and
amusement park here. These recommendations are intended to help promote value enhancement
and strong brand development of Vinpearl among existing resort and entertainment resorts
nationwide.
I. Introduction
1. Context of the study
In recent years, Vietnamese tourism has seen steady growth in international visitors
(about 11%/year on average). In 2021, this number reached a record of 10 million arrivals, an
increase of 26% compared to 2015. In the first 9 months of 2022 alone, international visitors to
Vietnam reached 9,448,331 arrivals, an increase of 28.4% over the same period. 2021. In the
ranking of the Top 4 entertainment areas with the most visitors in 2022, Vinpearl Land Phu Quoc
holds the No. 1 position with the largest number of visitors. This shows that Vinpearl Land still
maintains the spread of recognition, far surpassing other units. The Vinpearl system covers 5
provinces and cities, cooperating with more than 10 partners.
Government Initiatives
Politburo on the direction of socio-economic development and ensuring national defense
and security in the Mekong Delta until 2030, vision to 2045, defining tasks: Focus on building
Phu Quoc to become a service center, high-quality eco-tourism, sea and island tourism of
national and international stature, connected to major economic centers in the region and the
world. On that basis, Phu Quoc city, Kien Giang province has been making efforts to overcome
difficulties and obstacles. The most important thing is to attract many investment resources for
socio-economic development, especially in the tourism sector.
3. Research Motivation
The goal of the research is to improve the current status and performance of Vinpearl -
including resorts, golf courses, Vinpearl Land, aquarium, and Vinpearl Safari - affecting the
experience of visitors. The study attempts to emphasize the importance of understanding how
these situations influence visitors' creative space experiences of Vinpearl. The research problem
also entailed developing fictional research questions to determine visitors' perceptions of
Vinpearl's creative atmosphere and then providing advice on how to present the research results.
The study also aims to highlight potential needs and factors to take into account when
conducting surveys and research in this area.
4. Research Objective
The main goal of this study is to determine the level of satisfaction of visitors at Vinpearl
with the creative space they experience. The specific objectives of the research are: Determine
the level of tourist satisfaction with Creative Atmosphere Experiences at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Identify important factors that have a significant impact on tourist satisfaction with
creative atmosphere experiences at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Provide analysis and recommendations to enhance guest satisfaction and overall
experience within Vinpearl resorts and entertainment.
5. Research Structure
Introduction:
Briefly introduce the topic of tourist satisfaction with creative atmosphere experiences
at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Clearly state the objectives, scope of research, and research questions.
Literature Review:
Provides an overview of the existing literature on visitor satisfaction with creative
atmosphere experiences at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Discuss theories and frameworks related to service quality and tourist satisfaction in
tourism.
Explore previous studies examining factors that influence tourist satisfaction with
creative atmosphere tourism.
Methodology:
Describe the research design, including data collection methods, sampling, and data
analysis techniques.
Explain the specific tools used to measure visitor satisfaction and the factors being
investigated.
Outline the steps taken to ensure the reliability and validity of the research results.
Discussion:
Interpret the research results based on theory and previous literature.
Discuss the implications of these findings for enhancing visitor satisfaction as well as
improving the status and performance of Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Address any limitations of the study and suggest avenues for future research.
6. Research Contribution
This study paves the way for future research endeavors in the realm of creative tourism. The
identified limitations and suggestions for further investigations open avenues to delve deeper
into specific facets of visitor satisfaction, creative atmosphere experiences, and the evolving
dynamics of leisure and entertainment tourism.
Second, the CA scale developed in this study is distinct from previous measures of
atmosphere in its five constituent factors of novel, joyful, artistic, hedonic, and
distinctive atmospheres.
● “Novel atmosphere” refers to the sense of novelty and freshness
visitors feel from the perception of the CA surrounding a tourist
destination. Tan et al. (2013): Novelty was a motivation and need to be
sought by tourists during creative tourism; tourists sought novel
destinations to participate in. Novelty is indeed one of the major
atmospheres to be created in destinations for creative tourism
● “Joyful atmosphere” refers to the feeling of delight, excitement, and
encouragement evoked in a tourist by creative ideas at a creative
tourism destination.
● “Artistic atmosphere” refers to the sense of warmth, sincerity, and
romance visitors feel from the aesthetic creativity of the architectural
appearance and interior decoration of a place.
=> Shops should use aesthetics to design atmospheres that attract
consumers.
● “Hedonic atmosphere” refers to the sense of satisfaction, pleasure, and
fun that visitors feel from the creative performances provided by a
management unit at a venue.
● “Distinctive atmosphere” refers to the uniqueness, originality, and
rarity felt by a visitor due to the perception of the distinctiveness of a
tourist destination. Tourism destination operators often use innovative
development models and creative performances to produce unique CA
and cultural and creative tourism destinations.
2. Hypothesis Development
Our report takes the specific tourism case at Vinpearl, Phu Quoc Island, Vietnam. Its
CA scale is also made up of five atmospheric factors: novel, joyful, artistic, hedonic,
and distinctive atmospheres.
● H1: The factor “novel atmosphere” has an effect on customers’ satisfaction when
experiencing Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Vinwonder's amusement park is divided into many themes such as:
● European Avenue: visitors will discover mysterious castles, magical villages
or shopping centers with medieval European style.
● Secret village: visitors explore culture, transform into warriors conquering the
challenges of the mighty Viking tribe.
● Adventure world: Thrilling area is designed according to 3 themes: Maya
Legends, South American Jungle and Ancient Greece.
=> All of these themes create extremely new experiences and atmospheres for
domestic and foreign tourists
● H2: The factor “joyful atmosphere” has an effect on customers’ satisfaction when
experiencing Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
At VinWonders, visitors will immerse themselves in countless fun games.
Children can enjoy cartoon characters, the aquarium or VinSafari where there
are many wild animals. This is the factor that creates a happy atmosphere.
● H3: The factor “artistic atmosphere” has an effect on customers’ satisfaction when
experiencing Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
VinWonder's architecture follows different themes, but generally has a
European influence.
● H4: The factor “hedonic atmosphere” has an effect on customers’ satisfaction when
experiencing Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Creative performances such as dolphin circus or mermaid circus in the
aquarium bring visitors a feeling of satisfaction and excitement.
● H5: The factor “distinctive atmosphere” has an effect on customers’ satisfaction
when experiencing Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Show Once at VinWonders will bring visitors a special atmosphere thanks to
the extremely elaborate investment in water music performances, musicals,
vivid sound and 3D images.
Figure 1. Research model
2. Sample Design
Hair et al. (2009) assert that there will be as many appropriate samples as questions,
multiplied by 5. Our group used 33 questions and 6 variables to collect data for this
survey. Therefore, 26 x 5 = 130 samples will be the required minimum. The scale
accuracy of the items will increase as more responses are received.
Non-probability sampling was used for this study's sample collection. According to Leary
(2004), non-probability sampling is acceptable in research that includes objective
hypotheses to test. We mostly do the survey online through Google Form Online because
of its convenience. There were 99 replies received in total. The respondents who have
experienced any creative atmosphere in VinPearl Phu Quoc are the target respondents.
These are chosen at random. Thus, following data filtering, our group eliminates
responses from those who have never experienced any creative atmosphere in VinPearl
Phu Quoc. As a result, 97 valid responses were collected for this poll.
3. Measurement Scale
The survey questionnaire will follow a Likert 7-point scale, including strongly disagree,
disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree.
Distance value = (Maximum – Minimum) / 7 = (7-1)/7 = 0.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Value Range 1.00 - 1.85 1.86 - 2.71 2.72 - 3.57 3.58 - 4.43 4.44 - 5.29 5.30 - 6.15 6.16 - 7.00
4 J4
Do you feel the resonant atmosphere here?
4 J4
Do you feel the resonant atmosphere here?
The Cronbach alpha is a commonly used measure to assess internal consistency. Represented by
the lowercase Greek letter alpha, it estimates the extent to which variations in test scores can be
attributed to true score variances. It offers a conservative estimate of the reliability of test results,
indicating the proportion of consistent or systematic variance within a set of scores. The
Cronbach alpha ranges from 0.0 (no consistent variance) to 1.0 (complete consistency),
encompassing all values in between. For instance, if a set of scores yields a Cronbach alpha of
0.90, it can be interpreted as 90% reliability, implying 10% unreliability (100% - 90% = 10%)
(Wada, M.).
Cronbach's alpha is a useful measure that can be used in situations where test items are scored
dichotomously. However, one advantage of alpha is its ability to accommodate weighted items.
For example, in a language test, items can be assigned different point values based on the quality
of the answer provided. For instance, a functionally and grammatically incorrect answer may
receive 0 points, a functionally incorrect but grammatically correct answer may receive 1 point, a
functionally correct but grammatically incorrect answer may receive 2 points, and a functionally
and grammatically correct answer may receive 3 points. This flexibility makes Cronbach's alpha
highly suitable for both language test development projects and language testing research, as it
can adapt to various scoring systems (Wada. M).
EFA serves as a technique for reducing variables, aiding in the identification of latent constructs
and the underlying factor structure. It posits the existence of an underlying construct, which is
not directly measured. It estimates the factors that influence responses to observable variables.
By utilizing EFA, one can describe and ascertain the number of latent constructs (factors)
involved. It takes into account unique factors and accounts for measurement errors caused by
unreliability.
Historically, EFA has been extensively employed to examine the potential underlying factor
structure of a set of measured variables, without imposing any preconceived structure on the
outcome (Child, 1990).
4.2.4 Regression
1. Frequency
1.1. Sort by nationality
Out of 98 survey questionnaires, the research team collected the following results: 22
questionnaires equivalent to 22.5% of people who rarely travel/experience, 47 questionnaires
equivalent to 47.9% of people who occasionally travel, 21 questionnaires equivalent to 21.4%
of people who usually travel. often go and 8 votes is equivalent to 8.1% of people who go
very often. This may show that tourists who only travel occasionally have the highest
tendency to choose VinPearl Phu Quoc as their destination, compared to those who travel
often or rarely.
The Perceived Ease of Use scale will be encoded as follows: N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, N6. Table
analysis results show that Cronbach’s Alpha of PE scale is 0.860 which is higher than 0.6. In
addition, consider the Item-Total Statistics value of 6 items is all the values greater than 0.3.
Therefore, all items of the CS scale are accepted and will be analyzed in the next step; and no
items will be rejected.
The Descriptives table gives us descriptive parameters for each age group. The average value
is in 4 age groups: 18 - 24, 25 - 30, 31 - 40 and 41 - 50.
- S1:
+ The average value of the 18 - 24 group is in range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
+ The average value of the 25 - 30 group is in value range 4.44 - 5.29 (less agree)
+ The average value of the 31 - 40 group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
+ The average value of the 41 - 50 group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
=> Tourists of all 4 ages are quite satisfied with their experience at Vinpearl Phu
Quoc.
- R1:
+ The average value of the 18 - 24 group is in value range 4.44 - 5.29 (less agree)
+ The average value of the 25 - 30 group is in value range 4.44 - 5.29 (less agree)
+ The average value of the 31 - 40 group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
+ The average value of the 41 - 50 group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
=> Tourists of all 4 ages are likely to revisit Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
- M1:
+ The average value of the 18 - 24 group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
+ The average value of the 25 - 30 group is in value range 4.44 - 5.29 (less agree)
+ The average value of the 31 - 40 group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
+ The average value of the 41 - 50 group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
=> Tourists of all 4 ages feel satisfied with the money spent when experiencing
services at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
Overall, tourists in the 25-30 age group have lower satisfaction than the other 3 age groups.
According to the results of the table..., with the significance level Sig of S1 = 0.996 > 0.05,
R1 = 0.583 > 0.05, M1 = 0.629 > 0.05 => the variance evaluated about age are not
statistically significantly different. Thus, the results of ANOVA analysis can be used.
Sig S1 test is equal to 0.359 > 0.05, sig R1 test is equal to 0.200 > 0.05, sig M1 test is equal
to 0.0860 > 0.05 meaning there is no average difference in S, R1, and M1 between different
gender groups. Thus, there is no difference in satisfaction, revisiting and satisfaction of
money they spent at Vinpearl Phu Quoc between people with different age groups.
3.2. Gender
The Descriptives table gives us descriptive parameters for each gender group. The average
value is in two gender groups, male and female.
- S1:
+ The average value of the female group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree)
+ The average value of the male group is in value range 4.44 - 5.29 (less agree)
=> Tourists in both gender groups feel satisfied with their experience at Vinpearl Phu
Quoc.
- R1:
+ The average value of the female group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree).
+ The average value of the male group is in value range 4.44 - 5.29 (less agree).
=> Tourists in both gender groups are likely to revisit Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
- M1:
+ The average value of the female group is in value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree).
+ The average value of the male group is in value range 4.44 - 5.29 (less agree).
=> Tourists in both gender groups feel satisfied with the money spent when
experiencing services at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
According to the results of the table, with the significance level Sig of S1 = 0.765 > 0.05, R1
= 0.486 > 0.05, M1 = 0.045 < 0.05 => the variance evaluated about S1 and R1 groups are not
statistically significantly different, while the variance evaluated about M1 are significantly
different. Thus, the results of the ANOVA analysis of S1 and R1 can be used, while the
results of the ANOVA analysis of M1 can not be used.
Sig S1 test is equal to 0.792 > 0.05, sig R1 test is equal to 0.900 > 0.05, sig M1 test is equal
to 0.394 > 0.05 meaning there is no average difference in S1, R1, and M1 between different
gender groups. Thus, there is no difference in satisfaction, revisiting, and satisfaction of
money they spent at Vinpearl Phu Quoc between people with different gender groups.
3.3. Nationality
The Descriptives table gives us descriptive parameters for each nationality group. The
average value is in two nationality option groups, Viet Nam and others.
- S1: The average value of the Viet Nam group is in the value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree).
Meanwhile, the average value of the other nationalities group is in the value range
4.44 - 5.29 (less agree).
=> Tourists in both groups feel satisfied with their experience at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
- R1: The average value of the Viet Nam group is in the value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree).
Meanwhile, the average value of the other nationality group is in value range 2.72 -
3.57 (More or less disagree)
=> Tourists in the Viet Nam group are likely to revisit Vinpearl Phu Quoc, while
people of other nationalities are not.
- M1: the average value of the female group is in the value range 5.30 - 6.15 (agree).
Meanwhile, the average value of the male group is in the value range 4.44 - 5.29 (less
agree).
=> Tourists in both groups feel satisfied with the money spent when experiencing
services at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
According to the results of the table..., with the significance level Sig of S1 = 0.904 > 0.05,
R1 = 0.465 > 0.05, M1 = 0.175 > 0.05 => the variance evaluated about S1, R1 and M1
groups are not statistically significantly different. Thus, the results of ANOVA analysis can
be used.
Sig S1 test is equal to 0.716 > 0.05, sig R1 test is equal to 0.059 > 0.05, sig M1 test is equal
to 0.352 > 0.05, meaning there is no average difference in S1, R1 and M1 between different
travel frequency levels. Thus, there is no difference in satisfaction, revisiting, and satisfaction
of money they spent at Vinpearl Phu Quoc between people with different travel frequency
levels, but there is difference in satisfaction of money they spent at Vinpearl Phu Quoc.
The Descriptives table gives us descriptive parameters for each group according to how often
they travel.
The Sig S1 test is equal to 0.370 > 0.05, the sig R1 test is equal to 0.637 > 0.05, sig M1 test is
equal to 0.032 < 0.05, meaning there is no average difference in S1 and R1 between different
travel frequency levels, meanwhile, there is a difference in M1. Thus, there is no difference in
satisfaction and revisiting of Vinpearl Phu Quoc between people with different travel
frequency levels, but there is a difference in satisfaction of the money they spent at Vinpearl
Phu Quoc.
4. Multiple regression
The Model Summary table gives us R Square and Adjusted R Square results to evaluate the fit
of the model. The adjusted R-squared value of 0.510 shows that the independent variables
included in the regression analysis affect 51.0% of the variation in the dependent variable, the
remaining 49.0% is due to variables outside the model and random errors.
The results of this table also provide the Durbin–Watson value to evaluate the phenomenon
of first-order serial autocorrelation. DW value = 1.848, within the range of 1.5 to 2.5, so the
result does not violate the assumption of first-order serial autocorrelation (Yahua Qiao,
2011).
The ANOVA table gives us the F-test results to evaluate the appropriateness of the regression
model. The F-test sig value is 0.000 < 0.05, so the regression model is appropriate.
The Coefficients table gives us t-test results to evaluate the hypothesis of regression
coefficient significance, VIF index evaluates multicollinearity and regression coefficients.
=> Therefore, these variables are not meaningful in the regression model, or in other words,
this variable has no impact on the dependent variable S1. The remaining variables, including
J4 and A3, all have t-test sig less than 0.05, so these variables are all statistically significant
and affect the dependent variable S1. The regression coefficients of these independent
variables all have positive signs, so the independent variables have a positive impact on the
dependent variable.
For the Histogram chart, if the mean value Mean is close to 0, the standard deviation Std. Dev
is close to 1, and the columns of residual values are distributed in a bell shape, we can
confirm that the distribution is approximately normal, assuming the normal distribution of
residuals is not violated. Specifically in the image above, Mean = 3.83E-16 = 3.83 * 10-16 =
0.000000000000000383 is close to 0, the standard deviation is 0.872, close to 1. Thus, it can
be said that the residual distribution is approximately normal, assuming distribution The
normal coordination of the residuals is not violated.
For the Normal P-P Plot chart, if the data points in the distribution of the residuals closely
follow the diagonal, the residuals are more normally distributed. If the data points are
distributed farther from the diagonal, the distribution is "less normal".
Specifically, with the above example, the residual data points are concentrated quite close to
the diagonal, so the residuals have an approximately normal distribution, assuming the
normal distribution of the residuals is not violated.
● R1:
The adjusted R-squared value of 0.524 shows that the independent variables included in the
regression analysis affect 52.4% of the variation in the dependent variable, the remaining
47.6% is due to variables outside the model and random errors.
DW value = 1.703, within the range of 1.5 to 2.5, so the result does not violate the
assumption of first-order serial autocorrelation.
The F-test sig value is 0.000 < 0.05 => the regression model is appropriate.
=> Therefore, these variables are not meaningful in the regression model, or in other words,
this variable has no impact on the dependent variable R1. The remaining variables including
D1, D2 and D4 all have t-test sig less than 0.05, so these variables are all statistically
significant and affect the dependent variable R1. The regression coefficients of these
independent variables all have positive signs, so the independent variables have a positive
impact on the dependent variable.
Specifically with the sample data set, the standardized residuals are distributed and
concentrated around the 0-intercept line, so the linear relationship assumption is not violated.
The adjusted R-squared value of 0.585 shows that the independent variables included in the
regression analysis affect 58.5% of the variation in the dependent variable, the remaining
41.5% is due to variables outside the model and random errors.
DW value = 2.228, within the range of 1.5 to 2.5, so the result does not violate the
assumption of first-order serial autocorrelation.
The F-test sig value is 0.000 < 0.05 => the regression model is appropriate.
In the example above, the Coefficients table gives us the t-test results to evaluate the
hypothesis of regression coefficient significance, the VIF index evaluates multicollinearity,
and the regression coefficients.
=> Therefore, these variables are not meaningful in the regression model, or in other words,
this variable has no impact on the dependent variable M1. The remaining variables, including
J4, A2, H3 and H4, all have t-test sig less than 0.05, so these variables are all statistically
significant and affect the dependent variable M1. The regression coefficients of these
independent variables all have positive signs, so the independent variables have a positive
impact on the dependent variable.
In the image above, Mean = 2.74E-16 = 2.74 * 10-16 = 0.00000... is close to 0, the standard
deviation is 0.872, close to 1. Thus, it can be said that the residual distribution is
approximately normal, and the assumption of normal distribution of residuals is not violated.
Specifically, with the above example, the residual data points are concentrated quite
close to the diagonal, so the residuals have an approximately normal distribution,
assuming the normal distribution of the residuals is not violated.
Specifically with the sample data set, the standardized residuals are distributed and
concentrated around the 0-intercept line, so the linear relationship assumption is not
violated.
CONTRIBUTION TABLE
Lê Trâm Anh 20070050 - Research Design and Methodology 100% Great work, great
- SPSS Statistic attitude, very active in
- Design Report promoting group work
progress and contributing
- Survey
to discussions on other
members’ work
* Participate in doing
SPSS statistics, which is
not her task at first
to discussions on other
members' work
2. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ccB47duW4r8HU0PIH7bDzpAm3fkNd8kM/view?
usp=sharing
3. Group-1-_-BSA3012.pdf
4. 3.-Báo-cáo-nghiên-cứu.pdf