This document provides a peer evaluation form for rating groupmates on a project. It includes a scale from 5 to 20 points describing contribution levels from unsatisfactory to excellent. Groupmates are then rated and commented on, with most receiving scores of 15 or 20, indicating they contributed adequately or significantly to the project, despite some minor issues like occasional delays.
This document provides a peer evaluation form for rating groupmates on a project. It includes a scale from 5 to 20 points describing contribution levels from unsatisfactory to excellent. Groupmates are then rated and commented on, with most receiving scores of 15 or 20, indicating they contributed adequately or significantly to the project, despite some minor issues like occasional delays.
This document provides a peer evaluation form for rating groupmates on a project. It includes a scale from 5 to 20 points describing contribution levels from unsatisfactory to excellent. Groupmates are then rated and commented on, with most receiving scores of 15 or 20, indicating they contributed adequately or significantly to the project, despite some minor issues like occasional delays.
Please rate your groupmates based on the following:
Points Contribution Description
20 Excellent The person significantly contributed. Without
Contributor this person, the quality of our final output would have been considerably diminished.
15 Good Contributor The person contributed. Without this person,
the quality of our final output would have been diminished.
10 Marginal The person barely contributed. Without this
Contributor person, the quality of our final output would have been about the same.
5 Unsatisfactory The person failed to contribute in any
Contributor meaningful way. Other members of the group had to do more because of this person’s performance. Without this person, the quality of our final output may actually have been improved.
Name of Groupmates Points Comments
15 He submits his output a bit
late sometimes but still Aliwate, Ronald Jr. does the assigned task to him.
20 She initiates to do the
PowerPoint presentation Cruta, Sarah Dela Cruz without hesitation and does the task assigned to her.
15 There are some complaints
that I can hear from her Galamiton, Maricris whenever we give her a task but still does the task assigned to her. 20 No delays in the learning episode, he will send his Gasendo, Romeo output immediately and do the task assigned to him.
20 She also initiates things
especially when she can Picazo, Felmyr see that her groupmates are having a hard time.