A PROJECT DESIGN FOR BEYOND THE BOX CO.

(A CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRM)

IN SAN JOSE, BATANGAS CITY

A Final Project
Presented to the Faculty of the Civil Engineering Department
Technological Institute of the Philippines
Quezon City

In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course

CE013: Building Systems Design

by:

Cruz, Robert Jr., A.

2114574

Submitted to:
Engr. Brylle Jerald Timbal
Course Instructor

December 16, 2023

1
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 The Project............................................................................................................................................3
1.2 The Project Location............................................................................................................................. 3
1.3 The Client..............................................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER 2 - CONSTRAINTS, TRADE-OFFS, AND DESIGN STANDARDS...............................................5
2.1 Design Constraints................................................................................................................................5
2.1.1 Quantitative Constraint...................................................................................................................5
2.1.1.1 Economic Constraint............................................................................................................... 5
2.1.1.2 Constructability Constraint...................................................................................................... 6
2.1.1.3 Sustainability Constraints........................................................................................................6
2.1.1.5 Risk-Assessment Constraint................................................................................................... 7
2.1.2 Qualitative Constraint.....................................................................................................................7
2.1.2.1 Environmental Constraint........................................................................................................7
2.1.2.2 Legal Constraint...................................................................................................................... 7
2.1.2.3 Social Constraint..................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Design Trade-Offs................................................................................................................................. 8
2.2.1 Reinforced Concrete...................................................................................................................... 8
2.2.2 Structural Steel...............................................................................................................................9
2.3 Design Standards................................................................................................................................10
2.3.1 National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015.........................................................................10
2.3.2 National Building Code of the Philippines.....................................................................................11
2.3.3 ASEP Steel Handbook................................................................................................................. 11
2.3.4 American Institute of Steel Construction...................................................................................... 12
2.3.5 American Society of Civil Engineers............................................................................................ 12
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................................13
ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS…………………………………………………..……..…14-29

2
 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION

1.1 The Project

In the Philippines, the field of civil engineering is growing rapidly and is home to a community of
dedicated engineers who play a pivotal role in erecting structures worldwide. Despite their fundamental
role, civil engineering poses challenges, subjecting engineers to stress both professionally and personally.
The economy for engineers is expanding, and many possess talent capable of competing globally.
However, within the Philippines, these skills often go unappreciated, leaving competent engineers
underutilized and unrecognized.

A proposal has been put forth to establish a construction firm that transcends the mere
technicalities of engineering. This envisioned firm seeks to foster and develop talents, promote effective
communication, and create a supportive environment where engineers can not only excel in their work but
also find respite and relaxation. This is a great initiative that could help the community of engineers in the
Philippines.

1.2 The Project Location

In San Jose, the project is close to the Iglesia ni Cristo Local. 13.3 kilometers away from the
University of Batangas. The entire lot, which is 7653.1419 square meters, will not be used; only 350 square
meters will be used. The place was public and easily accessible.

Figure 1.1 Location of San Jose in the province of Batangas

3
 (Source: Google.com)

Figure 1.2 Location of project in San Jose City

(Source: Google.com)

1.3 The Client

The project client, Engineer Robert Cruz, intends to build a secure habitat within the civil
engineering community. The project site is located in San Jose due to the abundance of skilled civil
engineers graduating from Batangas State University in Batangas. The primary objective of the client is to
form a team of individuals to lead the project towards success.

4
 CHAPTER 2 - CONSTRAINTS, TRADE-OFFS, AND DESIGN STANDARDS

2.1 Design Constraints

The blueprint for the 5-story construction firm prioritizes structural integrity and adherence to local
building regulations for a commercial establishment of its stature. The design features 4 floors dedicated to
the firm’s core operations, with a focus on functionality, seamless workflow, and safety features such as
accessible elevators, emergency exits, and compliance with fire safety standards.
However, the addition of a rooftop bar and club presents unique challenges, requiring careful
zoning considerations to mitigate noise disturbances to surrounding areas. The rooftop’s design must
harmonize entertainment elements while ensuring structural stability and weather resilience. Emphasizing
both aesthetic appeal and practicality, the building’s exterior and interior should reflect the firm’s identity
while creating an inviting ambiance for clients and employees.

2.1.1 Quantitative Constraint

2.1.1.1 Economic Constraint (Project Cost)

The economic parameters governing the development of this 5-story construction firm with
dedicated operational floors and a rooftop entertainment space necessitate a keen focus on
cost-effectiveness at every stage. Budgetary constraints mandate prudent allocation of resources,
prioritizing efficient construction methods, and materials procurement without compromising structural
integrity or safety standards. Moreover, the incorporation of a rooftop bar and club introduces additional
financial considerations, including operational costs, staffing, licensing, and ongoing maintenance
expenses.
Balancing profitability with investment in quality infrastructure becomes pivotal, demanding a
strategic approach to revenue generation from both the core construction operations and the rooftop leisure
facility. A careful financial analysis must inform decisions, ensuring sustainability and profitability while
aligning with the firm’s overarching business objectives.
The project's financial constraints include funding and expenses, ensuring that the total costs do
not surpass 25 million pesos.

5
2.1.1.2 Constructability Constraint

The constructibility aspects governing the development of this 5-story construction firm,
incorporating 4 functional floors alongside a rooftop bar and club, demand meticulous planning to ensure
feasible execution. Challenges arise concerning the integration of diverse functionalities within limited
space while adhering to safety and regulatory standards. Construction logistics, such as material deliveries
and equipment access, must be carefully strategized to minimize disruptions to ongoing operations.
The incorporation of the rooftop leisure area presents unique complexities, requiring specialized
structural considerations to accommodate additional loads, including human traffic, amenities, and potential
weather impacts. Coordination among architectural, engineering, and construction teams becomes
imperative to harmonize design intent with practical construction feasibility, optimizing the build process for
efficiency without compromising the integrity of the structure or the safety of occupants.
With the constraints mentioned, the estimated time for completion of the said project is estimated
to be completed within one (1) to two (2) years not mentioning the weather conditions and the availability of
the required materials.

2.1.1.3 Sustainability Constraints

It is essential to incorporate environmentally sensitive methods into both the development and
operation phases. In order to reduce carbon footprint, the design and construction should give preference
to ecologically friendly materials, using locally and repurposed resources whenever feasible. It is essential
to have energy-efficient systems, such as those powered by renewable energy sources and smart lighting
and climate control technologies.
Strategies for reducing waste, like recycling initiatives and ethical waste management, ought to be
a part of every day operations. The difficulty is balancing the attraction of rooftop entertainment with
environmentally conscious efforts, which calls for creative ways to reduce energy use and maximize waste
disposal while promoting an environmentally conscious company culture.

The project's duration was projected to span between 30 to 45 years. The longevity of the design
will primarily hinge on meeting the client's needs and standards while complying with building codes.

6
2.1.1.4 Risk-Assessment Constraint

From construction-related hazards to safety concerns in the operational phases, including

structural integrity, rooftop safety, and business continuity, a comprehensive risk assessment strategy is
crucial. This assessment should encompass safety protocols, contingency plans, and continuous
monitoring to mitigate potential risks effectively.

2.1.2 Qualitative Constraint

2.1.2.1 Environmental Constraint

The project demands that eco-friendly building methods be used, with a preference for materials
that are highly durable and have a low impact on the environment. Energy-efficient systems that
incorporate smart technology for the best possible resource use coupled with renewable energy sources
are essential. Strategies for reducing waste must be included into day-to-day activities, such as recycling
programs and ethical garbage disposal techniques. In order to reduce energy consumption and encourage
environmentally friendly leisure activities, the rooftop bar and club pose special challenges that call for
sustainable design solutions.
To guarantee concordance between the company's activities and preservation of the environment,
creative solutions and a dedication to cultivating an eco-aware culture within the building and operational
frameworks are necessary.

2.1.2.2 Social Constraint

In order to minimize disturbance to the surrounding area during the construction phase, this project
should place a high priority on community engagement and welfare. Stressing safety precautions for the
company's employees as well as the nearby community becomes essential. In addition, the integration of a
rooftop bar and club necessitates conscientious entertainment management to reduce noise levels and
possible disruptions for adjacent neighbors, cultivating a positive rapport with the community. The company
may also think about social programs that will improve the community's social fabric by fostering
employment possibilities or funding local development initiatives.

7
2.2 Design Trade-Offs

2.2.1 Reinforced Concrete

When designing using reinforced concrete, a number of trade-offs must be made. Because of its
strength and longevity, it's a great option for constructions that require strong support. Its weight, however,
may prevent it from being used in taller structures where mass reduction is essential. Another trade-off is
weighing the quantity of reinforcement against the cost; more reinforcement boosts strength but also raises
costs and lengthens construction times.
Furthermore, although the compression strength of concrete is strong, its tensile strength is rather
low, meaning that reinforcing is required to prevent cracking and structural collapse. Concrete's adaptability
allows for a wide range of shapes and forms, although complex designs may need elaborate formwork,
which may increase construction costs and time. When using reinforced concrete in structural designs, it's
critical to strike the correct balance between strength, cost, construction time, and aesthetics.

Figure 2.1 Reinforced Concrete SMRF

(Source: Google Images)

8
 Table 2.0 Advantages and Disadvantages of Reinforced Concrete
Advantages Disadvantages

1. High compressive strength 1. Tensile strength is one-tenth of compressive

strength

2. Adequate tensile strength 2. Uncertainty of final strength

3. Fire and weather resistance 3. High cost

4. Durable 4. Shrinkage

5. Low maintenance cost 5. Larger column section

2.2.2 Structural Steel

When designing with structural steel, a number of trade-offs must be made. Large, wide spaces
and lofty structures may be created thanks to its high strength-to-weight ratio, which also provides
architectural flexibility and efficient material utilization. But because steel corrodes easily, it needs protective
coatings or upkeep, which raises the initial and recurring expenditures. Steel's prefabrication capabilities
enable quick construction, but complex designs or unique shapes may call for specialist fabrication, which
will affect the budget and schedule.
Furthermore, because steel constructions expand and contract with changes in temperature,
careful consideration in design may be necessary to avoid structural problems. It is imperative to strike a
balance among strength, durability, initial and ongoing expenses, building speed, and design complexity
when choosing structural steel for architectural projects.

Figure 2.2 Structural Steel

(Source: Google Images)

9
 Table 3.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Structural Steel SMRF
Advantages Disadvantages

1. Reliable 1. High maintenance

2. Less construction time 2. Undergoes corrosion

3. Elastic 3. Higher initial cost

4. Ductile 4. Less availability

5. High strength and lightweight 5. Needs fireproofing for safety

2.3 Design Standards

2.3.1 National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015

The National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 2015 provides comprehensive guidelines
for safe and efficient construction practices. Here are some design standards aligned with the NSCP 2015:

1. Loading Criteria: In order to guarantee structural stability and safety, adhere to the live loads, dead
loads, wind loads, and seismic loads as prescribed by the NSCP 2015.

2. Material Specifications: Make use of materials that meet NSCP guidelines to guarantee the
integrity and quality of structural elements such steel, concrete, and other building supplies.

3. Design Methods and Calculations: To ascertain suitable member sizes, reinforcement details, and
connection designs for different structural elements, apply the correct structural analysis and
design methodologies as outlined by the NSCP 2015.

4. Foundation Design: To ensure solid support for the structure, design the foundation in accordance
with NSCP rules, taking into account potential settlements, bearing capacity, and soil conditions.

5. Design of Reinforced Concrete: Adhere to the National Structural Code of Practice (NSCP) in
designing reinforced concrete. This includes adhering to the guidelines for minimum concrete

10
 cover, permissible stresses, and detailing reinforcement to guarantee structural integrity and
longevity.

6. Steel Structure Design: To provide strength, stability, and resilience, steel structures must be
designed in accordance with NSCP criteria. This includes material specifications, connection
detailing, and structural member design.

2.3.2 National Building Code of the Philippines

The National Building Code of the Philippines' design requirements are a comprehensive set of
regulations that control many aspects of building construction. By defining design loads for various forces
like live, dead, wind, and seismic loads, these standards ensure structural integrity and safety and enforce
conformity to zoning rules for land use and building classification. The code specifies plumbing,
mechanical, electrical, and ventilation system requirements as well as accessibility for people with
disabilities, sanitation, and fire safety precautions.
It also stresses documentation and compliance throughout the construction process and requires
the use of approved materials and construction methods, ensuring that buildings are erected and occupied
in a way that prioritizes public welfare, safety, and functionality.

2.3.3 ASEP Steel Handbook

The ASEP Steel Handbook's design standards offer thorough guidelines for the structural design of
steel components and systems. These standards address material requirements, member sizing,
connection design, load considerations, and other topics related to the design of steel structures. They also
include comprehensive methodology and calculations. The guidebook provides thorough information on
steel design, including topics such as stability analysis, allowed stresses, buckling considerations, and
detailed requirements for different structural components. In order to ensure that engineers and designers
follow exact guidelines to create safe, effective, and structurally sound steel-based constructions, it
incorporates industry best practices, safety factors, and considerations for both static and dynamic loads. It
also takes sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and durability into account.

11
2.3.4 American Institute of Steel Construction

The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) handbook's design guidelines provide a
thorough framework for the structural design and analysis of steel structures. Strict procedures and
guidelines addressing material characteristics, structural member design, connection detailing, and
fabrication issues are included in these standards. In order to ensure compliance with safety concerns and
industry best practices, the handbook offers thorough recommendations for engineers and designers on
load combinations, stability studies, and design criteria for various structural parts. In order to create robust
and affordable steel-based constructions, it integrates cutting-edge design techniques, such as the use of
high-performance materials and creative connection techniques, with a focus on safety, efficiency, and
sustainability.

2.3.5 American Society of Civil Engineers

The design standards found in the handbook of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
provide a wide range of recommendations and techniques that are essential to civil engineering projects.
These standards cover a wide range of topics, including environmental issues, transportation, geotechnical
engineering, water resources, and structural analysis. For engineers and practitioners, the handbook offers
comprehensive protocols that address topics such as construction materials, design requirements, risk
assessment techniques, and sustainability. It emphasizes safety, resilience, and sustainability in the
planning, design, construction, and maintenance of civil infrastructure projects, ensuring they meet strict
quality, safety, and performance criteria. It does this by integrating state-of-the-art research, technological
advancements, and industry best practices.

12
 REFERENCES

Service Steel Warehouse (2021). DIFFERENT TYPES OF STRUCTURAL STEEL

SHAPES https://www.servicesteel.org/resources/structural-steel-shapes

ACI (2014). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14) and
Commentary on building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318R-14),
American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI

Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines. (2015). National Structural Code

of the Philippines (7Th ed., Vol. 1)

Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines, Inc. (1994). Asep Steel

Handbook

ASTM International - Standards Worldwide. (n.d.). Retrieved October 13, 2022, from
https://www.astm.org/

Civil Today (2019). Advantages and Disadvantages of Reinforced Concrete.

https://civiltoday.com/civil-engineering-materials/concrete/23-advantages-and-disadvant
ages-of-reinforced-concrete

STRUCTURAL (2023). Advantages and Disadvantages of Reinforced Concrete.

https://structural.community/articles/advantages-of-steel-construction/

Kumar K. (pg. 1 and 2) (2020.). Advantages and Disadvantages of Steel Structures and
Reinforce Concrete as a Structural Design Material.

Behind the Blueprint: Understanding the Importance of Building Regulations (2023).

https://www.basearchitecture.co.uk/news/behind-the-blueprint-understanding-the-import
ance-of-building-regulations/

13
ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS

14
 4 - DC -3
ADM 4 6
T 3 6 2 0 C
LO 140.55m
N 82°17' E
1
N
6

27.93m
AREA

S 4°47' E
7653.1419m²

N 3°07' W
5 4

79.70m
67.41m S 89°37' W

38.1
5m
N 18
LOT 3620 CADM 464 - D C - 3

°23'
POINTS DISTANCE BEARING
2

W
REF-1 2351.00 m S 11°44' W 3 65.02m S 87°18' W

1-2 79.70 m S 4°47' E

2-3 65.02 m S 87°18' W
3-4 38.15 m N 18°23' W
4-5 67.41 m S 89°37' W
5-6 27.93 m N 3°07' W
6-1 140.55 m N 82°17' E

S-1 LOT PLAN AND BEARING SCHEDULING

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 LANDING LANDING

FIRE FIRE
EXIT EXIT

TO 2ND FLOOR TO 2ND FLOOR

RESTROOMS RESTROOMS

INTERVIEW INTERVIEW
ROOM LOBBY ROOM

WAITING LOUNGE WAITING

AREA AREA

S-1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 LANDING LANDING
FIRE FIRE
EXIT EXIT
RESTROOMS RESTROOMS
2ND FLOOR TO 3RD FLOOR TO 3RD FLOOR 2ND FLOOR

DRESSING DRESSING DRESSING DRESSING DRESSING DRESSING

ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM

FOOD STALL 1 FOOD STALL 2

EMPLOYEE'S
LOUNGE
DINING DINING
AREA AREA

EMPLOYEE'S
LOUNGE

S-1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 LANDING LANDING
FIRE FIRE
EXIT EXIT
RESTROOMS RESTROOMS
3RD FLOOR TO 4TH FLOOR TO 4TH FLOOR 3RD FLOOR

LOBBY

LOUNGE

BUSINESS OPERATIONS HUMAN RESOURCE

ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION

S-1 THIRD FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 LANDING LANDING
FIRE FIRE
EXIT EXIT
RESTROOMS RESTROOMS
4TH FLOOR TO 5TH FLOOR TO 5TH FLOOR 4TH FLOOR

LOBBY

LOUNGE

EXECUTIVE
CONFERENCE ROOM

CONFERENCE ROOM 1 CONFERENCE ROOM 2

S-1 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 LANDING LANDING
FIRE FIRE
EXIT EXIT
RESTROOMS RESTROOMS
4TH FLOOR TO 5TH FLOOR TO 5TH FLOOR 4TH FLOOR

B A R C O U N T E R

MAIN HALL

VIP VIP VIP VIP

ROOM 1 ROOM 2 ROOM 5 ROOM 6
DANCE
HALLWAY FLOOR HALLWAY

VIP VIP VIP VIP

ROOM 3 ROOM 4 ROOM 7 ROOM 8

DJ BOOTH

S-1 FIFTH FLOOR PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 4.3 0.5 7.25 0.5 7.25 0.5 4.3

C-1 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-1

F-1 TB-2 F-1 TB-2 F-1 TB-2 F-1 TB-2 F-1
A
2.35

TB-1

TB-1

TB-1
TB-1

TB-1
B
C-1 TB-2 C-2 TB-2 C-2 TB-2 C-2 TB-2 C-1
F-1 F-1 F-1 F-1 F-1
4.9

TB-1

TB-1
0.35

1.944 m Ø WIRE MESH

C-1 ON .20 m thk CONC.FLR SLAB C-1
F-1 @ .15 m SPACING VERT. AND HORZ. F-1
BOTHWAYS
C
TB-1

TB-1
4.2
0.4

D
C-2 TB-2 C-2 TB-2 C-2 C-2 TB-2 C-2 TB-2 C-2
F-1 F-1 F-1 F-1 F-1 F-1

TB-1

TB-1
2.1

E
C-2 TB-2 C-2
F-1 F-1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S-1 FOUNDATION PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 4.2 7.25 7.25 4.2

C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1

A

TB-1

TB-1

TB-1
TB-1

TB-1
2.28

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

B
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
4.85

TB-1

TB-1
C-1 C-1
S-1 C
TB-1

TB-1
4.18

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

D
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
TB-1

TB-1
2.1

C-1 C-1
E
TB-2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S-1 GROUND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 4.2 7.25 7.25 4.2

C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1

A

TB-1

TB-1

TB-1
TB-1

TB-1
2.28

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

B
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
4.85

TB-1

TB-1
C-1 C-1
S-1 C
TB-1

TB-1
4.18

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

D
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
TB-1

TB-1
2.1

C-1 C-1
E
TB-2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S-1 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 4.2 7.25 7.25 4.2

C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1

A

TB-1

TB-1

TB-1
TB-1

TB-1
2.28

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

B
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
4.85

TB-1

TB-1
C-1 C-1
S-1 C
TB-1

TB-1
4.18

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

D
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
TB-1

TB-1
2.1

C-1 C-1
E
TB-2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S-1 THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 4.2 7.25 7.25 4.2

C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1

A

TB-1

TB-1

TB-1
TB-1

TB-1
2.28 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1
B
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
4.85

TB-1

TB-1
C-1 C-1
S-1 C
TB-1

TB-1
4.18

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

D
TB-2 TB-2 TB-1 TB-2 TB-2

TB-1
2.1

C-1 C-1
E
TB-2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S-1 FOURTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 4.2 7.25 7.25 4.2

C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1 TB-2 C-1

A

TB-1

TB-1

TB-1
TB-1

TB-1
2.28

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

B
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
4.85

TB-1

TB-1
C-1 C-1
S-1 C
TB-1

TB-1
4.18

C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1 C-1

D
TB-2 TB-2 TB-2 TB-2
TB-1

TB-1
2.1

C-1 C-1
E
TB-2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S-1 FIFTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 1 2 3 4

1.8
R.L
B
3.35

5TH.F.L
C
3.3

4TH.F.L
D
3.3

3RD.F.L
E
3.3

2ND.F.L
F
3.5

G.F.L
G

FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE 1:100 MTS
 1 2 3 4

1.8
R.L
B

3.35
5TH.F.L
C

3.3
4TH.F.L
D
3.3

3RD.F.L
E
3.3

2ND.F.L
F
3.5

G.F.L
G

LEFT SIDE ELEVATION

SCALE 1:100 MTS
 1 2 3 4

A
1.8

R.L
B
3.35

5TH.F.L
C
3.3

4TH.F.L
D
3.3

3RD.F.L
E
3.3

2ND.F.L
F
3.5

G.F.L
G

REAR ELEVATION
SCALE 1:100 MTS
 1 2 3 4

1.8
R.L
B

3.35
5TH.F.L
C

3.3

4TH.F.L
D
3.3

3RD.F.L
E
3.3

2ND.F.L
F
3.5

G.F.L
G

RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION

SCALE 1:100 MTS