You are on page 1of 41

(Original PDF) Essential Statistics 2nd

Edition by Robert Gould


Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/download/original-pdf-essential-statistics-2nd-edition-by-rob
ert-gould/
Second Edition

Essential
STATISTICS
exploring the world through data

Gould | Ryan | Wong


Contents
Preface xi
Index of Applications xx

CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Data 2


CASE STUDY  Deadly Cell Phones? 3
1.1 What Are Data? 4
1.2 Classifying and Storing Data 6
1.3 Organizing Categorical Data 10
1.4 Collecting Data to Understand Causality 15
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Collecting a Table of Different Kinds of Data 25

CHAPTER 2 Picturing Variation with Graphs 36


CASE STUDY  Student-to-Teacher Ratio at Colleges 37
2.1 Visualizing Variation in Numerical Data 38
2.2 Summarizing Important Features of a Numerical Distribution 43
2.3 Visualizing Variation in Categorical Variables 51
2.4 Summarizing Categorical Distributions 54
2.5 Interpreting Graphs 57
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Personal Distance 61

CHAPTER 3 Numerical Summaries of Center and Variation 82


CASE STUDY  Living in a Risky World 83
3.1 Summaries for Symmetric Distributions 84
3.2 What’s Unusual? The Empirical Rule and z-Scores 94
3.3 Summaries for Skewed Distributions 99
3.4 Comparing Measures of Center 106
3.5 Using Boxplots for Displaying Summaries 111
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Does Reaction Distance Depend on Gender? 118

CHAPTER 4 Regression Analysis: Exploring Associations


between Variables 142
CASE STUDY  Catching Meter Thieves 143
4.1 Visualizing Variability with a Scatterplot 144
4.2 Measuring Strength of Association with Correlation 148
4.3 Modeling Linear Trends 156
4.4 Evaluating the Linear Model 169
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Guessing the Age of Famous People 177

vii

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 7 06/11/15 12:12 PM


viii CONTENTS

CHAPTER 5 Modeling Variation with Probability 204


CASE STUDY  SIDS or Murder? 205
5.1 What Is Randomness? 206
5.2 Finding Theoretical Probabilities 209
5.3 Associations in Categorical Variables 218
5.4 Finding Empirical Probabilities 228
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Let’s Make a Deal: Stay or Switch? 233

CHAPTER 6 Modeling Random Events: The Normal and


Binomial Models 248
CASE STUDY  You Sometimes Get More Than You Pay For 249
6.1 Probability Distributions Are Models of Random Experiments 250
6.2 The Normal Model 255
6.3 The Binomial Model (optional) 268
EXPLORING STATISTICS  ESP with Coin Flipping 283

CHAPTER 7 Survey Sampling and Inference 300


CASE STUDY  Spring Break Fever: Just What the Doctors Ordered? 301
7.1 Learning about the World through Surveys 302
7.2 Measuring the Quality of a Survey 308
7.3 The Central Limit Theorem for Sample Proportions 316
7.4 Estimating the Population Proportion with Confidence Intervals 323
7.5 Comparing Two Population Proportions with Confidence 330
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Simple Random Sampling Prevents Bias 337

CHAPTER 8 Hypothesis Testing for Population Proportions 354


CASE STUDY  Dodging the Question 355
8.1 The Essential Ingredients of Hypothesis Testing 356
8.2 Hypothesis Testing in Four Steps 363
8.3 Hypothesis Tests in Detail 372
8.4 Comparing Proportions from Two Populations 379
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Identifying Flavors of Gum through Smell 387

CHAPTER 9 Inferring Population Means 404


CASE STUDY  Epilepsy Drugs and Children 405
9.1 Sample Means of Random Samples 406
9.2 The Central Limit Theorem for Sample Means 410
9.3 Answering Questions about the Mean of a Population 417
9.4 Hypothesis Testing for Means 427
9.5 Comparing Two Population Means 433
9.6 Overview of Analyzing Means 448
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Pulse Rates 452

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 8 06/11/15 12:12 PM



CONTENTS ix

CHAPTER 10 Analyzing Categorical Variables and Interpreting


Research 476
CASE STUDY  Popping Better Popcorn 477
10.1 The Basic Ingredients for Testing with Categorical Variables 478
10.2 Chi-Square Tests for Associations between Categorical Variables 485
10.3 Reading Research Papers 494
EXPLORING STATISTICS  Skittles 503
Appendix A Tables A–1
Appendix B Check Your Tech Answers A–9
Appendix C Answers to Odd-Numbered Exercises A–11
Appendix D Credits A–33
Index I–1

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 9 06/11/15 12:12 PM


This page intentionally left blank

561590_MILL_MICRO_FM_ppi-xxvi.indd 2 24/11/14 5:26 PM


Preface
About This Text
The primary focus of this text is still, as in the first edition, data. We live in a data-
driven economy and, more and more, in a data-centered culture. We don’t choose
whether we interact with data; the choice is made for us by websites that track our
browsing patterns, membership cards that track our spending habits, cars that transmit
our driving patterns, and smart phones that record our most personal moments.
The silver lining of what some have called the Data Deluge is that we all have access
to rich and valuable data relevant in many important fields: environment, civics, social sci-
ences, economics, health care, entertainment. This text teaches students to learn from such
data and, we hope, to become cognizant of the role of the data that appear all around them.
We want students to develop a data habit of mind in which, when faced with decisions,
claims, or just plain curiosity, they know to reach for an appropriate data set to answer
their questions. More important, we want them to have the skills to access these data and
the understanding to analyze the data critically. Clearly, we’ve come a long way from the
“mean median mode” days of rote calculation. To survive in the modern economy requires
much more than knowing how to plug numbers into a formula. Today’s students must
know which questions can be answered by applying which statistic, and how to get tech-
nology to compute these statistics from within complex data sets.

What’s New in the Second Edition


The second edition remains true to the goals of the first edition: to provide students
with the tools they need to make sense of the world by teaching them to collect,
­visualize, analyze, and interpret data. With the help of several wise and careful readers
and class testers, we have fine-tuned the second edition to better achieve this vision. In
some sections, we have rewritten explanations or added new ones. In others, we have
more substantially reordered content.
More precisely, in this new edition you will find
•  Coverage of two-proportion confidence intervals in Chapters 7 and 8.
• An increase of more than 150 homework exercises in this edition, with more
than 400 total new, revised, and updated exercises. We’ve added larger data sets
to Chapters 2, 3, 4, and 9. We’ve also added exercises to Section 2.5 and more
Chapter Review exercises throughout.
•  New or updated examples in each chapter, with current topics such as views of
stem cell research (Chapter 7) and online classes (Chapter 10).
• A more careful and thorough integration of technology in many examples.
• Two new case studies: Student-to-Teacher Ratios in Chapter 2 and Dodging the
Question in Chapter 8.
• A more straightforward implementation of simulations to understand probability in
Chapter 5.
• A more unified presentation of hypothesis testing in Chapter 8 that better joins
conceptual understanding with application.
• A greater number of “Looking Back” and “Caution” marginal boxes to help direct
students’ studies.
• Updated technology guides to match current hardware and software.

xi

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 11 06/11/15 12:12 PM


xii PREFACE

Approach
Our text is concept-based, as opposed to method-based. We teach useful statistical
methods, but we emphasize that applying the method is secondary to understanding the
concept.
In the real world, computers do most of the heavy lifting for statisticians. We
therefore adopt an approach that frees the instructor from having to teach tedious
procedures and leaves more time for teaching deeper understanding of concepts.
Accordingly, we present formulas as an aid to understanding the concepts, rather than
as the focus of study.
We believe students need to learn how to
• Determine which statistical procedures are appropriate.
• Instruct the software to carry out the procedures.
• Interpret the output.
We understand that students will probably see only one type of statistical software in
class. But we believe it is useful for students to compare output from several different
sources, so in some examples we ask them to read output from two or more software
packages.
One of the authors (Rob Gould) served on a panel of co-authors for the first
edition of the collegiate version of the American Statistical Association–endorsed
Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE). We firmly
believe in its main goals and have adopted them in the preparation of this book.
• We emphasize understanding over rote performance of procedures.
• We use real data whenever possible.
• We encourage the use of technology both to develop conceptual understanding and
to analyze data.
• We believe strongly that students learn by doing. For this reason, the homework
problems offer students both practice in basic procedures and challenges to build
conceptual understanding.

Coverage
The first few chapters of this book are concept-driven and cover exploratory data anal-
ysis and inferential statistics—fundamental concepts that every introductory statistics
student should learn. The last part of the book builds on that strong conceptual foun-
dation and is more methods-based. It presents several popular statistical methods and
more fully explores methods presented earlier.
Our ordering of topics is guided by the process through which students should
analyze data. First, they explore and describe data, possibly deciding that graphics and
numerical summaries provide sufficient insight. Then they make generalizations (infer-
ences) about the larger world.
Chapters 1–4: Exploratory Data Analysis. The first four chapters cover data collection
and summary. Chapter 1 introduces the important topic of data collection and com-
pares and contrasts observational studies with controlled experiments. This chapter also
teaches students how to handle raw data so that the data can be uploaded to their statis-
tical software. Chapters 2 and 3 discuss graphical and numerical summaries of single
variables based on samples. We emphasize that the purpose is not just to produce a
graph or a number but, instead, to explain what those graphs and numbers say about
the world. Chapter 4 introduces simple linear regression and presents it as a technique
for providing graphical and numerical summaries of relationships between two numeri-
cal variables.

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 12 06/11/15 12:12 PM


PREFACE xiii

We feel strongly that introducing regression early in the text is beneficial in build-
ing student understanding of the applicability of statistics to real-world scenarios.
After completing the chapters covering data collection and summary, students have
acquired the skills and sophistication they need to describe two-variable associations
and to generate informal hypotheses. Two-variable associations provide a rich context
for class discussion and allow the course to move from fabricated problems (because
one-variable analyses are relatively rare in the real world) to real problems that appear
frequently in everyday life.
Chapters 5–8: Inference. These chapters teach the fundamental concepts of statisti-
cal inference. The main idea is that our data mirror the real world, but imperfectly;
although our estimates are uncertain, under the right conditions we can quantify our
uncertainty. Verifying that these conditions exist and understanding what happens if
they are not satisfied are important themes of these chapters.
Chapters 9–10: Methods. Here we return to the themes covered earlier in the text and
present them in a new context by introducing additional statistical methods, such as
estimating population means and analyzing categorical variables. We also provide (in
Section 10.3) guidance for reading scientific literature, to offer students the experience
of critically examining real scientific papers.

Organization
Our preferred order of progressing through the text is reflected in the Contents, but
there are some alternative pathways as well.
10-week Quarter. The first eight chapters provide a full, one-quarter course in intro-
ductory statistics. If time remains, cover Sections 9.1 and 9.2 as well, so that students
can solidify their understanding of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests by revisit-
ing the topic with a new parameter.
Proportions First. Ask two statisticians, and you will get three opinions on whether
it is best to teach means or proportions first. We have come down on the side of
proportions for a variety of reasons. Proportions are much easier to find in popular
news media (particularly around election time), so they can more readily be tied to
students’ everyday lives. Also, the mathematics and statistical theory are simpler;
because there’s no need to provide a separate estimate for the population standard
deviation, inference is based on the Normal distribution, and no further approxima-
tions (that is, the t-distribution) are required. Hence, we can quickly get to the heart
of the matter with fewer technical diversions.
The basic problem here is how to quantify the uncertainty involved in estimating a
parameter and how to quantify the probability of making incorrect decisions when pos-
ing hypotheses. We cover these ideas in detail in the context of proportions. Students
can then more easily learn how these same concepts are applied in the new context of
means (and any other parameter they may need to estimate).
Means First. Conversely, many people feel that there is time for only one parameter
and that this parameter should be the mean. For this alternative presentation, cover
Chapters 6, 7, and 9, in that order. On this path, students learn about survey sampling
and the terminology of inference (population vs. sample, parameter vs. statistic) and
then tackle inference for the mean, including hypothesis testing.
To minimize the coverage of proportions, you might choose to cover Chapter 6,
Section 7.1 (which treats the language and framework of statistical inference in detail),
and then Chapter 9. Chapters 7 and 8 develop the concepts of statistical inference more
slowly than Chapter 9, but essentially, Chapter 9 develops the same ideas in the context
of the mean.

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 13 06/11/15 12:12 PM


xiv PREFACE

If you present Chapter 9 before Chapters 7 and 8, we recommend that you devote
roughly twice as much time to Chapter 9 as you have devoted to previous chapters,
because many challenging ideas are explored in this chapter. If you have already cov-
ered Chapters 7 and 8 thoroughly, Chapter 9 can be covered more quickly.

Features
We’ve incorporated into this text a variety of features to aid student learning and to
facilitate its use in any classroom.

Integrating Technology
Modern statistics is inseparable from computers. We have worked to make this text acces-
sible for any classroom, regardless of the level of in-class exposure to technology, while
still remaining true to the demands of the analysis. We know that students sometimes do
not have access to technology when doing homework, so many exercises provide output
from software and ask students to interpret and critically evaluate that given output.
Using technology is important because it enables students to handle real data, and
real data sets are often large and messy. The following features are designed to guide
students.
• TechTips outline steps for performing calculations using TI-84® (including
TI-84 + C®) graphing calculators, Excel®, Minitab®, and StatCrunch®. We do not
want students to get stuck because they don’t know how to reproduce the results
we show in the text, so whenever a new method or procedure is introduced, an
icon, Tech , refers students to the TechTips section at the end of the chapter. Each
set of TechTips contains at least one mini-example, so that students are not only
learning to use the technology but also practicing data analysis and reinforcing
ideas discussed in the text. Most of the provided TI-84 steps apply to all TI-84
­calculators, but some are unique to the TI-84 + C calculator.
• Check Your Tech examples help students understand that statistical calculations
done by technology do not happen in a vacuum and assure them that they can get
the same numerical values by hand. Although we place a higher value on inter-
preting results and verifying conditions required to apply statistical models, the
numerical values are important, too.
• All data sets used in the exposition and exercises are available on the companion
website at pearsonhighered.com/gould. These data are also available at http://www
.pearsonhighered.com/mathstatsresources/. A variety of statistical software options
are available to be bundled with this text. For a complete list of the software options,
please contact your Pearson Education sales representative.

Guiding Students
• Each chapter opens with a Theme. Beginners have difficulty seeing the forest for
the trees, so we use a theme to give an overview of the chapter content.
• Each chapter begins by posing a real-world Case Study. At the end of the chapter,
we show how techniques covered in the chapter helped solve the problem pre-
sented in the Case Study.
• Margin Notes draw attention to details that enhance student learning and reading
comprehension.
 The data icon appears alongside examples or discussions to indicate that the
original data are available on the companion website.
Caution notes provide warnings about common mistakes or misconceptions.

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 14 06/11/15 12:12 PM


PREFACE xv

Looking Back reminders refer students to earlier coverage of a topic.


Details clarify or expand on a concept.

• KEY
POINT Key Points highlight essential concepts to draw special attention to them.
 
Understanding these concepts is essential for progress.
•  Snapshots break down key statistical concepts introduced in the chapter,
quickly summarizing each concept or procedure and indicating when and how
it should be used.
• An abundance of worked-out examples model solutions to real-world problems rel-
evant to students’ lives. Each example is tied to an end-of-chapter exercise so that
students can practice solving a similar problem and test their understanding. Within the
exercise sets, the icon TRY indicates which problems are tied to worked-out examples
in that chapter, and the numbers of those examples are indicated.
• The Chapter Review that concludes each chapter provides a list of important new
terms, student learning objectives, a summary of the concepts and methods dis-
cussed, and sources for data, articles, and graphics referred to in the chapter.

Active Learning
• For each chapter we’ve included an activity, Exploring Statistics, that students
are intended to do in class as a group. We have used these activities ourselves, and
we have found that they greatly increase student understanding and keep students
engaged in class.
  • All exercises are located at the end of the chapter. Section Exercises are designed
to begin with a few basic problems that strengthen recall and assess basic knowl-
edge, followed by mid-level exercises that ask more complex, open-ended ques-
tions. Chapter Review Exercises provide a comprehensive review of material
covered throughout the chapter.
The exercises emphasize good statistical practice by requiring students to
verify conditions, make suitable use of graphics, find numerical values, and
interpret their findings in writing. All exercises are paired so that students can check
their work on the odd-numbered exercise and then tackle the corresponding even-
numbered exercise. The answers to all odd-numbered exercises appear in the back
of the student edition of the text.
Challenging exercises, identified with an asterisk (*), ask open-ended ­questions
and sometimes require students to perform a complete statistical analysis. For
­exercises marked with a , accompanying data sets are available in MyStatLab and
on the companion ­website.
• Most chapters include select exercises marked with a within the exercise set,
to indicate that problem-solving help is available in the Guided Exercises
section. If students need support while doing homework, they can turn to the
Guided Exercises to see a step-by-step approach to solving the problem.

Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the attention and energy that a large number of people devoted to
making this a better book. We extend our gratitude to Elaine Newman (Sonoma State
University) and Ann Cannon (Cornell College), who checked the accuracy of this
text and its many exercises. Thanks also to David Chelton, our developmental editor,
to Carol Merrigan, who handled production, to Peggy McMahon, project manager,
and to Connie Day, our copyeditor. Many thanks to John Norbutas for his ­technical
advice and help with the TechTips. We thank Suzanna Bainbridge, our ­acquisitions

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 15 06/11/15 12:12 PM


xvi PREFACE

editor, Justin Billing, editorial assistant, and Deirdre Lynch, editor-in-chief, for ­signing
us up and sticking with us, and we are grateful to Dona Kenly and Erin Kelly for their
market ­development efforts.
We extend our sincere thanks for the suggestions and contributions made by the
following reviewers of this edition:

Lloyd Best, Pacific Union College Patrick Perry, Hawaii Pacific University Mahbobeh Vezvaei, Kent State
Mario Borha, Loyola University of Victor I. Piercey, Ferris State University University
Chicago Danielle Rivard, Post University Jerimi Ann Walker, Moraine Valley
David Bosworth, Hutchinson Community Alex Rolon, North Hampton Community Community College
College College Dottie Walton, Cuyahoga Community
Beth Burns, Bowling Green State University Ali Saadat, University of California – College
Jim Johnston, Concord University Riverside Judy H. Williams, Tidewater Community
Manuel Lopez, Cerritos College Carol Saltsgaver, University of Illinois – College
Ralph Padgett Jr., University of California – Springfield Jane Marie Wright, Suffolk County
Riverside Kelly Sakkinen, Lake Land College Community College
Ron Palcic, Johnson County Community Sharon l. Sullivan, Catawba College Cathleen Zucco-Teveloff, Rider
College Manuel Uy, College of Alameda University

We would also like to extend our sincere thanks for the suggestions and contributions
that the following reviewers, class testers, and focus group attendees made to the previ-
ous edition.

Arun Agarwal, Grambling State University Elizabeth Paulus Brown, Waukesha Karen Estes, St. Petersburg College
Anne Albert, University of Findlay County Technical College Mariah Evans, University of Nevada, Reno
Michael Allen, Glendale Community College Leslie Buck, Suffolk Community College Harshini Fernando, Purdue University
Eugene Allevato, Woodbury University R.B. Campbell, University of Northern Iowa North Central
Dr. Jerry Allison, Trident Technical College Stephanie Campbell, Mineral Area College Stephanie Fitchett, University of Northern
Polly Amstutz, University of Nebraska Ann Cannon, Cornell College Colorado
Patricia Anderson, Southern Adventist Rao Chaganty, Old Dominion University Elaine B. Fitt, Bucks County Community
University Carolyn Chapel, Western Technical College College
MaryAnne Anthony-Smith, Santa Ana Christine Cole, Moorpark College Michael Flesch, Metropolitan Community
College Linda Brant Collins, University of Chicago College
David C. Ashley, Florida State College James A. Condor, Manatee Community Melinda Fox, Ivy Tech Community
at Jacksonville College College, Fairbanks
Diana Asmus, Greenville Technical College Carolyn Cuff, Westminster College Joshua Francis, Defiance College
Kathy Autrey, Northwestern State Phyllis Curtiss, Grand Valley State Michael Frankel, Kennesaw State
University of Louisiana University University
Wayne Barber, Chemeketa Community Monica Dabos, University of California, Heather Gamber, Lone Star College
College Santa Barbara Debbie Garrison, Valencia Community
Roxane Barrows, Hocking College Greg Davis, University of Wisconsin, College, East Campus
Jennifer Beineke, Western New England Green Bay Kim Gilbert, University of Georgia
College Bob Denton, Orange Coast College Stephen Gold, Cypress College
Diane Benner, Harrisburg Area Julie DePree, University of New Nick Gomersall, Luther College
Community College Mexico–Valencia Mary Elizabeth Gore, Community College
Norma Biscula, University of Maine, Jill DeWitt, Baker Community College of Baltimore County–Essex
Augusta of Muskegon Ken Grace, Anoka Ramsey Community
K.B. Boomer, Bucknell University Paul Drelles, West Shore Community College College
David Bosworth, Hutchinson Community Keith Driscoll, Clayton State University Larry Green, Lake Tahoe Community
College Rob Eby, Blinn College College
Diana Boyette, Seminole Community Nancy Eschen, Florida Community Jeffrey Grell, Baltimore City Community
College College at Jacksonville College

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 16 06/11/15 12:12 PM


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xvii

Albert Groccia, Valencia Community Walter H. Mackey, Owens Community Community College
College, Osceola Campus College Delray Schultz, Millersville University
David Gurney, Southeastern Louisiana Keith McCoy, Wilbur Wright College Jenny Shook, Pennsylvania State
University Elaine McDonald-Newman, Sonoma State University
Chris Hakenkamp, University of University Danya Smithers, Northeast State
Maryland, College Park William McGregor, Rockland Community Technical Community College
Melodie Hallet, San Diego State University College Larry Southard, Florida Gulf Coast
Donnie Hallstone, Green River Bill Meisel, Florida State College at University
Community College Jacksonville Dianna J. Spence, North Georgia College
Cecil Hallum, Sam Houston State University Bruno Mendes, University of California, & State University
Josephine Hamer, Western Connecticut Santa Cruz René Sporer, Diablo Valley College
State University Wendy Miao, El Camino College Jeganathan Sriskandarajah, Madison Area
Mark Harbison, Sacramento City College Robert Mignone, College of Charleston Technical College–Traux
Beverly J. Hartter, Oklahoma Wesleyan Ashod Minasian, El Camino College David Stewart, Community College of
University Megan Mocko, University of Florida Baltimore County–Cantonsville
Laura Heath, Palm Beach State College Sumona Mondal, Clarkson University Linda Strauss, Penn State University
Greg Henderson, Hillsborough Kathy Mowers, Owensboro Community John Stroyls, Georgia Southwestern
Community College and Technical College State University
Susan Herring, Sonoma State University Mary Moyinhan, Cape Cod Community Joseph Sukta, Moraine Valley
Carla Hill, Marist College College Community College
Michael Huber, Muhlenberg College Junalyn Navarra-Madsen, Texas Woman’s Lori Thomas, Midland College
Kelly Jackson, Camden County College University Malissa Trent, Northeast State Technical
Bridgette Jacob, Onondaga Community Azarnia Nazanin, Santa Fe College Community College
College Stacey O. Nicholls, Anne Arundel Ruth Trygstad, Salt Lake Community
Robert Jernigan, American University Community College College
Chun Jin, Central Connecticut State Helen Noble, San Diego State University Gail Tudor, Husson University
University Lyn Noble, Florida State College at Manuel T. Uy, College of Alameda
Maryann Justinger, Ed.D., Erie Jacksonville Lewis Van Brackle, Kennesaw State
Community College Keith Oberlander, Pasadena City College University
Joseph Karnowski, Norwalk Community Pamela Omer, Western New England Mahbobeh Vezvaei, Kent State University
College College Joseph Villalobos, El Camino College
Susitha Karunaratne, Purdue University Nabendu Pal, University of Louisiana at Barbara Wainwright, Sailsbury University
North Central Lafayette Henry Wakhungu, Indiana University
Mohammed Kazemi, University of North Irene Palacios, Grossmont College Dottie Walton, Cuyahoga Community
Carolina–Charlotte Adam Pennell, Greensboro College College
Robert Keller, Loras College Joseph Pick, Palm Beach State College Jen-ting Wang, SUNY, Oneonta
Omar Keshk, Ohio State University Philip Pickering, Genesee Community Jane West, Trident Technical College
Raja Khoury, Collin County Community College Michelle White, Terra Community College
College Robin Powell, Greenville Technical Bonnie-Lou Wicklund, Mount Wachusett
Brianna Killian, Daytona State College College Community College
Yoon G. Kim, Humboldt State University Nicholas Pritchard, Coastal Carolina Sandra Williams, Front Range
Greg Knofczynski, Armstrong Atlantic University Community College
University Linda Quinn, Cleveland State University Rebecca Wong, West Valley College
Jeffrey Kollath, Oregon State University William Radulovich, Florida State Alan Worley, South Plains College
Erica Kwiatkowski-Egizio, Joliet Junior College at Jacksonville Jane-Marie Wright, Suffolk Community
College Mumunur Rashid, Indiana University of College
Sister Jean A. Lanahan, OP, Molloy Pennsylvania Haishen Yao, CUNY, Queensborough
College Fred J. Rispoli, Dowling College Community College
Katie Larkin, Lake Tahoe Community Nancy Rivers, Wake Technical Lynda Zenati, Robert Morris Community
College Community College College
Michael LaValle, Rochester Community Corlis Robe, East Tennesee State University Yan Zheng-Araujo, Springfield
College Thomas Roe, South Dakota State University Community Technical College
Deann Leoni, Edmonds Community College Dan Rowe, Heartland Community College Cathleen Zucco-Teveloff, Rider
Lenore Lerer, Bergen Community College Carol Saltsgaver, University of University
Quan Li, Texas A&M University Illinois–Springfield Mark A. Zuiker, Minnesota State
Doug Mace, Kirtland Community College Radha Sankaran, Passaic County University,

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 17 06/11/15 12:12 PM


Resources for Success
MyStatLab® Online Course for Essential Statistics: Exploring
the World through Data, Second Edition, Gould/Ryan/Wong
(access code required)
MyStatLab is available to accompany Pearson’s market-leading text offerings. To
give students a consistent tone, voice, and teaching method, each text’s flavor and
approach is tightly integrated throughout the accompanying MyStatLab course, mak-
ing learning the material as seamless as possible.
Data Cycle of Everyday
Things Videos
Data Cycle of Everyday Things Videos
demonstrate for students that data can
be, and is, a part of everyday life! Through
a series of fun and engaging episodes,
students learn to collect, analyze, and
apply data to answer any range of real-
world statistical questions.

Chapter Review Videos


Chapter Review Videos walk students through
solving a selection of the more complex
problems posed in each chapter, provid-
ing a review of the chapter’s key concepts
and methods and offering students support
where they most need it.

Technology Tutorial
Videos and Study Cards
Technology Tutorials provide brief
video walkthroughs and step-by-
step instructional study cards on
common statistical procedures
for Minitab®, Excel®, and the
TI-83/84 graphing calculator.

www.mystatlab.com

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 18 10/11/15 2:49 PM


Resources for Success
Instructor Resources Student Resources
Additional resources can be downloaded from Additional resources for student success.
www.pearsonhighered.com or MyStatLab; hard-copy
resources can be ordered from your sales representative. Student Solutions Manual
(ISBN 10: 0-13-413312-9; ISBN 13: 978-0-13-413312-6)
Instructor’s Edition Student Solutions Manual provides detailed,
(ISBN 10: 0-13-413335-8; ISBN 13: 978-0-13-413335-5) worked-out solutions to all odd-numbered text
Instructor’s Edition contains answers to all text exercises.
exercises, as well as a set of Instructor Resource
Pages that offer chapter-by-chapter teaching Study Cards for Statistics Software
suggestions and commentary. Study Cards for Statistics Software This series
of study cards, available for Excel, Minitab, JMP®,
Instructor’s Solutions Manual SPSS®, R, StatCrunch, and the TI-84 graphing
Instructor’s Solutions Manual contains worked-out calculators, provides students with easy, step-by-
solutions to all the text exercises. step guides to the most common statistics software.

TestGen PowerPoint Slides


TestGen® (www.pearsoned.com/testgen) PowerPoint Slides provide an overview of each
Updated to more closely mirror the 2nd Edition book, chapter, stressing important definitions and offering
TestGen enables instructors to build, edit, print, and additional examples. These slides are an excellent
administer tests using a computerized bank of questions resource for both traditional and online students.
developed to cover all the objectives of the text.
Chapter Review Videos
Online Test Bank Chapter Review Videos walk students through
Online Test Bank (download only) includes tests for solving a selection of the more complex problems
each chapter with questions aimed to reinforce the posed in each chapter, thereby offering a review of
text’s learning objectives. the chapter’s key concepts and providing students
support where they most need it.
PowerPoint® Lecture Slides
PowerPoint Lecture Slides, aligned with the text, The Data Cycle of Everyday
provide an overview of each chapter, stressing Things Videos
important definitions and offering additional The Data Cycle of Everyday Things Videos
examples. Multiple-choice questions are included for demonstrate for students that data collection and
class assessment. data analysis can be applied to answer questions
about everyday life. Through a series of fun and
Learning Catalytics engaging episodes, students learn to collect, analyze,
Learning Catalytics is a web-based engagement and and apply data to answer any range of real-world
assessment tool. As a “bring-your-own-device” statistical questions.
direct response system, Learning Catalytics offers a
diverse library of dynamic question types that
allow students to interact with and think critically
about statistical concepts. As a real-time resource,
instructors can take advantage of critical teaching
moments both in the classroom or through
assignable and gradeable homework.

www.mystatlab.com

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 19 06/11/15 12:12 PM


Index of Applications
BIOLOGY retail car sales, 71 course enrollment rates, 30
sex of children, 239 rich people, 120–121, 189, 344 debt after graduation, 457
baby seals, 260, 262–263 salaries/wages, 180, 184, 185, 191, 196 education and marital status, 214,
bats, 454 shrinking middle class, 56 215–216, 217, 221, 487–488
birth length, 292, 293 soda production, 148–149 education and widows, 225
births by month, 513 stressed moms, 344–345 employment after law school, 74
body temperature, 292 textbook prices, 67, 462, 463 English in California schools, 188–189
brain size, 28, 122–123, 128, 465 turkey costs, 191 exam scores, 97–98, 130, 133, 193, 198,
cats’ birth weights, 290 used car values, 168–169 199, 454, 466
elephants’ birth weights, 290 wealth distribution in United States, 70 gender of teachers, 342
eye color and sex, 242, 244 women CEOs, 392 GPAs, 179, 181, 458, 459, 460
finger length, 506 grades, 237
gestation periods for animals, 68 guessing on tests, 236, 243, 342,
CRIME AND CORRECTIONS 390–391
heights and armspans, 64, 185, 186–187 “boot camp” and prevention, 389, 390
longevity of animals, 68 height and test scores, 195
California judges, 513
low birth weights, 292 high school diplomas, 343
counseling and criminology, 395
men’s heights, 289, 290 high school graduation rates, 345,
crime and gender, 505
reaction distances, 459, 466 346–347, 349–350
criminal court judges, 235
red blood cells, 288 hours of study, 132, 197
death penalty, 241, 340, 342, 393
sex of children, 236, 290 IQs, 124, 286, 288
death row, 130
sex of grandchildren, 240 law school tuition, 68–69
DWI convictions, 291
sleep time of animals, 129 majors, 71
homicide clearance, 291
tree heights, 196 marriage and college degree, 237
jury duty, 240
twins, 290 math grades and tutoring, 30
jury selection, 342, 390
white blood cells, 288 math scores, 85–86
parental training and criminal behavior
women’s heights, 286–287, 288–290 multiple-choice tests, 69, 76, 238, 390,
of children, 513
399
Perry Preschool attendance and arrests,
BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS 513
number of years of formal education, 65
air fares, 183–184 Oregon bar exam, 342, 349
property crime, 124, 128
BAs and median income, 180 parental educational level, 121,
recidivism, 239, 242, 273–274, 290, 512
benefits of having rich people, 242 192–193
Scared Straight prevention program, 32
capitalism, 241 percentage of students married or
SIDS or murder?, 205–206
CEO ages, 63, 64, 120 ­parents, 244
stolen bicycles, 272–273, 290
CEO salaries, 76 preschool attendance, 345, 346–347,
therapy and criminology, 395
clothes spending, 65, 462 349–350
violent crime, 123, 134
debt after graduation, 457 preschool attendance and high school
Virginia juveniles, 242
e-book publishing, 363 graduation rates, 508–509
economic class, 54–55 proportion of seniors in student
film budgets and grosses, 196 EDUCATION ­population, 341
gas prices, 86–87, 92–93, 101 ACT scores, 287 random assignment of professors, 235
grocery prices, 466, 467 alumni donations, 512 rating professors, 184
happiness and wealth, 242 BA percentage, 129 salary and education, 184, 196
holiday spending, 131 bar exam pass rates, 42, 48, 129, 197 SAT scores, 67, 124, 160–161, 241, 286,
income, 455–456 BAs and median income, 180 288, 289, 292–293, 293–294
income tax rate, 68, 127, 466 of California residents, 70 semesters and units completed, 189, 454
Internet advertising, 358–359 changing multiple-choice answers, 237 shoe sizes, 75, 179, 194–195
investing, 190 cheating, 390 student ages, 28, 133, 454, 456, 460
likelihood of becoming rich, 242 college admission rates, 290–291, 457 student-to-teacher ratio, 37–38, 60
living in poverty, 342 college dropout rate, 390 teacher satisfaction, 227
Navy commissary prices, 464 college enrollment, 427 teachers’ pay and costs of education, 191
Occupy Wall Street, 509 college graduation, 291, 457 true/false tests, 398, 399
pay rate in different currencies, 122 college professors’ salaries, 180 tuition and fees, 64, 181, 420, 431,
percentage of people thriving, 343–344 college tours, 511 446–447
prices at Target and Whole Foods, commute times, 64 value of college education, 236–237, 238
195–196 confidence in public schools, 343 working and student grades, 191–192

xx

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 20 06/11/15 12:12 PM



INDEX OF APPLICATIONS xxi

EMPLOYMENT coffee, 32, 465 houses with swimming pools, 120


age discrimination, 391 cola taste test, 390, 391, 396 Morse code, 322–323, 329, 340, 393
career goals, 348 color of M&Ms, 340, 341 number of pairs of shoes owned, 64,
college students working, 28 cost of turkeys, 191 126–127, 464
commuting times, 64 eating out, 67, 76, 122, 132, 464 pets, 68
earnings by gender, 120 fast food, 108–109 right-handed people, 29
eating out and jobs, 67, 76, 122, 132 fat in sliced turkey and ham compared, risky activities, 83–84, 116–117
employment after law school, 74 102 seesaw height, 184, 187
flex time, 397 grocery prices, 466, 467 skyscrapers, 112–113, 129
hours of work, 66 hungry monkeys, 488-489 sleeping in, 436–437
job categories, 73 mercury in freshwater fish, 342, 393 Social Security numbers and age, 187
paid vacation days, 121 no-carb diets, 394 tossing thumbtacks, 285, 237
pay rate in different currencies, 122 number of alcoholic drinks per week, weight of trash, 183, 192
salaries, 180, 184, 196, 344 123, 125
time employed, 455 organic food, 463 HEALTH
unemployment rates, 397 pizza size, 424 age and sleep, 180, 195
work and sleep, 180 popcorn, 477–478, 501 age and weight, 187, 195
work and TV, 180, 184 size of ice cream cones, 249, 282 ages of women who gave birth, 181
work from home, 397 snacks, 28 antibiotic or placebo, 506
working and student grades, 191–192 soda consumption, 131 antibiotics, 345–346, 389, 390
soda production, 148–149, 243 antiretrovirals to prevent HIV, 509
ENTERTAINMENT soft drink serving size, 458 arthritis, 394
animated movies, 124–125 vegan diets, 342 Atkins diet, 460
film budgets and grosses, 196 weight of carrots, 457 autism and MMR vaccine, 513
hours of television viewing, 73, 466 weight of colas, 465 bariatric surgery for diabetes, 509
iTunes library, 409 weight of hamburgers, 69, 458 birth lengths, 122, 124
movies and magic, 125, 167–168 weight of ice cream cones, 465 birth weights, 122, 124, 455
movies with dinner served, 28 weight of oranges, 457 blood pressure, 22, 190
MP3 song lengths, 107–108 weight of potatoes, 458 blood sugar, 512
New York City weather, 288 weight of tomatoes, 459 blood thinners, 33
numbers of televisions, 63, 120, 460, body mass index, 63, 459
body temperatures, 459, 468
461, 468–469 GAMES breast cancer, 31
roller coaster endurance, 46 blackjack tips, 198
work and TV, 180, 184 calcium, 449–450
brain games, 20–21, 497–498
calcium and death rate, 511–512
coin flips, 244, 339, 341, 389, 393, 396
caloric restriction, 488–489
ENVIRONMENT color of cubes, 244
causes of death, 56–57
blood pressure and city living, 22 dealing cards, 223–224
cell phones and cancer, 3–4, 23–24
city temperatures, 128 drawing cards, 236
cholesterol levels, 198, 459
climate change, 245 flipping coins, 226–227, 236, 239, 240,
coffee and stroke, 511
daily temperatures, 96, 98 285, 290, 291
college athletes’ weights, 462
depth of snow, 285 gambling, 240
colored vegetables and stroke, 512–513
global temperatures, 74–75 rolling dice, 218, 237, 390
copper bracelets, 31
mercury in freshwater fish, 342, 393 spinning coins, 366–367, 373, 393, 394
Crohn’s disease, 23, 335–336
smog levels, 87–89, 91–92, 95–96 throwing dice, 211–212, 229–230, 239,
dancers’ heights, 460
240, 241, 252–253, 285
death row and head trauma, 34
FINANCE deep vein thrombosis, 398
condo rental prices, 64 GENERAL INTEREST depression treatment, 30
land value prediction, 179 accuracy of shooting, 340 diabetes, 343
real estate prices, 122, 126, 133, 184, 194 ages of students, 237 diarrhea vaccine in Africa, 395
retirement income, 455 birthdays and days of the week, 236, 241 diet drug, 346
underwater mortgages, 328–329 book widths, 158–159 dieting, 444–445
breath holding, 74 drug for asthma, 512, 515
FOOD AND DRINK cat and dog ownership, 244 drug for platelets, 511
alcohol in beer, 69, 194 children’s ages, 122 drug for rheumatoid arthritis, 512
Atkins diet, 460 dogs vs. cats, 315, 319–320 early tonsillectomy for children, 30
banning super-size sugary drinks, 347 hand folding, 238, 245 endocarditis, 510
bottled vs. tap water, 389 handedness, 241 epilepsy drugs during pregnancy,
breakfast, 64 home and car ownership, 237 405–406, 451
butter taste test, 394, 396 houses with garages, 71–72 ER visits for injuries, 76

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 21 06/11/15 12:12 PM


xxii INDEX OF APPLICATIONS

exercise, 34, 64, 197 stroke survival rate, 389 SOCIAL ISSUES
flu vaccines, 31 systolic blood pressures, 461–462 adoptions, 71
hand and foot length, 185–186 tight control of blood sugar, 512 age by year, 71
hand washing, 348, 399 transfusions for bleeding in the stomach, ages of brides and grooms, 464
handspans, 181 346 belief in UFOs, 245
head circumference, 126, 130, 134 treatment for CLL, 395, 400 body piercings, 50–51
healthcare plan, 399 triglycerides, 461, 462 cell phone calls, 455
heart attacks, 389 vaccinations for diarrhea, 514 country of origin, 507
heart rate before and after coffee, 465 vegan diets, 342 cremation rates, 292
heights, 131 video games and body mass index, 184 death row and head trauma, 34
heights and ages for children, 198 vitamin C and allergies, 31 divorce, 290
heights and weights, 152–153, 181, vitamin D and osteoporosis, 33 drunk walking, 291
193–194 weight loss, 31, 121, 180, 397, 507 education and marital status, 214,
heights of bedridden patients, 163–165 weights of soccer players and academic 215–216, 217, 221, 487–488
heights of children, 104–106 decathlon team members compared, education and widows, 225
heights of fathers and sons, 130, 193 122 gays and lesbians, 241, 345, 397
heights of females, 124, 133 weights of vegetarians, 459 gender and opinion on same-sex
heights of males, 133, 459, 464 ­marriage, 480–481
heights of students and parents, 467 LAW guns in homes, 398
HIV-1 and HIV-2, 33 chief justices’ ages at installation, 121 happiness, 123, 125, 196, 465
hormone replacement therapy, 73 gun control, 393, 397, 399 ideal family, 131
hospital rooms, 510–511 Oregon bar exam, 342, 349 Iraq casualties and hometown
human cloning, 344 three-strikes law, 397–398 ­populations, 191
hypothermia for babies, 395 life expectancy and TV, 191
ideal weight, 75 marital status, 32
iron and death rate, 511 POLITICS
marriage and children, 237
jet lag drug, 506–507 children of first ladies, 121
marriage and college degree, 237
life expectancy, 188, 191 dodging the question, 355–356, 385–386
marriage rates, 29
light at night and tumors, 510 party and right direction, 506
number of births and population, 30
light exposure in mice, 31–32 political party, 243–244
number of children, 458
low birth weights, 292 presidential election of 1960, 397
number of cigarettes smoked, 76
malnutrition, 345–346 presidents’ ages at inauguration, 121, 460
number of siblings, 28, 65, 180
Medicaid expansion, 33 primary elections of 2012, 348
obesity and marital status, 507, 515
men’s health, 370–372 socialism, 241
Occupy Wall Street, 509
multiple myeloma, 514 votes for independents, 398
population and number of millionaires, 189
nausea drug, 346 voting, 237, 343
population density, 29, 127, 132
nicotine gum, 395 population in 2007, 29
nicotine patch, 509–510 PSYCHOLOGY population increase, 132
nighttime physician staffing in ICU, 514 body image, 72 population prediction, 29
no-carb diets, 394 boys’ weight perception, 466–467 probation and gender, 32–33
number of AIDS cases, 29, 34–35 brain games, 20–21 proportion of people who are married,
obesity, 32, 344 confederates and compliance, 31, 397
obesity and marital status, 507 509–510 smiling and age, 396
overweight children, 342 depression treatment, 30 spring break fever, 301–302, 336
personal data collection, 8–9 dreaming, 348, 391
pneumonia vaccine for young children, extrasensory perception, 269, 274–276, SPORTS
30–31 340–341, 390, 396, 398–399 baseball strike, 126
position for breathing, 74 financial incentive effectiveness, 394 basketball free-throw shots, 243, 280
pregnancy, 124, 405–406, 451 gender and happiness of marriage, 508 basketball team heights, 468
preventable deaths, 69–70 happiness and traditional views, 239 marathon size, 46–47, 110, 131
prostate cancer, 32, 514 happiness and wealth, 242 NCAA soccer players, 50
pulse rates, 413, 460, 461, 463, 469 IQs, 124 Olympics, 122
removal of healthy appendixes, 510 obesity and marital status, 32 race finishing times, 165
scorpion antivenom, 33 opinion about nurses, 245 surfing, 121–122, 132, 464
SIDS, 205–206 overeating and brain function, 31 weights of backpacks, 464
sleep, 63, 64, 72, 180, 464, 466 poverty and IQ, 17–18 weights of baseball and soccer players
sleep medicine for shift workers, 398 sleep walking, 392 compared, 67
smoking, 123, 187, 188, 347, 463 smiling, 395 weights of college athletes, 462
steroids and height, 511 smiling and age, 508 wins and strike-outs for baseball pitchers,
stroke, 33 TV violence, 482–483, 506, 507–508 189

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 22 06/11/15 12:12 PM



INDEX OF APPLICATIONS xxiii

SURVEYS AND OPINION stem cell research, 321, 332–334, driving accidents, 132–133
POLLS 381–382 DWI convictions, 291
astrology, 344 taxes, 393 gas mileage of cars, 196
capital punishment, 340 underwater mortgages, 328–329 gas prices, 86–87, 92–93, 101
confidence in military, 343 value of college education, 236–237, meter thieves, 143, 176
confidence in public schools, 343 238, 245 MPG for highway and city, 190
dreaming in color, 348 wording of polls, 397 pedestrian fatalities, 30
e-reader poll, 364–365 plane crashes, 393
economics in East Germany, 343 TECHNOLOGY red cars and stop signs, 505–506
gender and opinion on same-sex age and the Internet, 303 right of way, 382–384
­marriage, 480–481 cell phone use, 72, 455 seat belt use, 11–13, 239, 245, 390,
ghosts, 327 e-music and the Internet, 73 391–392
human cloning, 344 e-readers, 441–443 speed driven, 75
immigration, 343 Internet access, 241, 291 speeding tickets, 64, 131
marriage as obsolete, 343, 391 Internet advertising, 358–359 stolen bicycles, 272–273, 290
most important problem, 507 teens and the Internet, 220 stolen car rates, 14
musician survey, 72 text messages, 69, 190, 192 SUVs, 390
news survey, 281 texting while driving, 291, 398 texting while driving, 291, 398
opinion about nurses, 245 time and distance of flights, 188, 198
opinions on global warming, 74–75, 393 TRANSPORTATION traffic cameras, 75
party and right direction, 506 air fares, 183–184 traffic lights, 243
political party affiliation, 70–71 commuting times, 64 turn signal use, 346
presidential elections, 320–321, 344 crash-test results, 7 used car age and mileage, 147–148,
seat belt use, 11–13, 140, 390, 391–392 driver’s exam, 238, 241, 291–292 168–169, 456
sexual harassment, 307–308 drivers aged 60–65, 291 used car values, 168–169
Social Security, 339 drivers’ deaths and ages, 188 waiting for the bus, 254–255

A01_GOUL4406_02_SE_FM.indd 23 06/11/15 12:12 PM


This page intentionally left blank

561590_MILL_MICRO_FM_ppi-xxvi.indd 2 24/11/14 5:26 PM


Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Means of
Chemical Belligerent Effect
Projection
Benzyl iodide French Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Benzyl chloride French Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Bromoacetone French Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Lethal
Bromobenzylcyanide French Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Bromomethylethylketone German Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Lethal Artillery shell
Benzyl bromide German Lachrymatory Artillery shell
French
Chlorine German Lethal Cylinders
British (cloud gas)
French
American
Chlorosulfonic acid German Irritant Hand grenades,
light minenwerfer
Chloroacetone French Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Chlorobenzene (as solvent) German Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Chloropicrin British Lethal Artillery shell
French Lachrymatory Trench mortar
bombs
German Projectors
American
Cyanogen bromide Austrian Lethal Artillery shell
Dichloromethylether German Lachrymatory Artillery shell
(as solvent)
Diphenylchloroarsine German Sternutatory Artillery shell
Lethal
Dichloroethylsulfide German Vesicant Artillery shell
French Lethal
British Irritant
American
Ethyldichloroarsine German Lethal Artillery shell
Ethyliodoacetate British Lachrymatory Artillery shell,
4-in. Stokes’
mortars,
hand grenades
French (In mixtures. See Lachrymatory
Hydrocyanic acid
below)
Methylchlorosulfonate German Irritant Minenwerfer
Monochloromethylchloroformate French Lachrymatory Lachrymatory
Phosgene British Lethal Projectors,
French trench mortars,
German artillery shell,
American cylinders
Means of
Chemical Belligerent Effect
Projection
Phenylcarbylaminechloride German Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Irritant
Trichlormethylchloroformate German Lethal Artillery shell
Stannic chloride British Irritant Hand grenades
French Cloud forming Artillery
American Projectors
4-in. Stokes’
mortar bombs
Sulfuric anhydride German Irritant Hand grenades,
minenwerfer,
artillery shell
Xylyl bromide German Lachrymatory Artillery shell

TABLE I—Continued
Means of
Chemical Belligerent Effect
Projection
Mixtures[4]
Bromoacetone (80%) and French Lachrymatory Artillery shell
Chloroacetone (20%) Lethal
Chlorine (50%) and British Lethal
Cylinders
Phosgene (50%) German
Chlorine (70%) and Lethal
British Cylinders
Chloropicrin (30%) Lachrymatory
Chloropicrin (65%) and Lethal
British Cylinders
Hydrogen sulfide (35%) Lachrymatory
Chloropicrin (80%) and British Lethal Artillery shell
Stannic chloride (20%) French Lachrymatory Trench mortar bombs
American Irritant Projectors
Chloropicrin (75%) and Lethal Artillery shell
Phosgene (25%) British Lachrymatory Trench mortar bombs,
projectors
Dichloroethyl sulfide (80%) German Vesicant
and Chlorobenzene (20%) French Lethal Artillery shell
British
American
Ethyl carbazol (50%) and Sternutatory
German Artillery shell
Diphenylcyanoarsine (50%) Lethal
Ethyldichloroarsine (80%) and Lethal
German Artillery shell
Dichloromethylether (20%) Lachrymatory
Ethyliodoacetate (75%) and Artillery shell,
Alcohol (25%) British Lachrymatory 4-in. Stokes’ mortars,
Means of
Chemical Belligerent Effect
Projection
hand grenades
Hydrocyanic acid (55%)
Chloroform (25%) and British Lethal Artillery shell
Arsenious chloride (20%)
Hydrocyanic acid (50%),
Arsenious chloride (30%), French Lethal Artillery shell
Stannic chloride (15%) and
Chloroform (5%)
Phosgene (50%) and
British Lethal Artillery shell
Arsenious chloride (50%)
Dichloroethyl sulfide (80%) German Vesicant
and Carbon tetrachloride (20%) French Lethal Artillery shell
British
American
Phosgene (60%) and British Lethal
Artillery shell
Stannic chloride (40%) French Irritant
Methyl sulfate (75%) and Lachrymatory
French Artillery shell
Chloromethyl sulfate (25%) Irritant

(2) To simulate the presence of a toxic gas. This may be done either by
using a substance whose odor in the field strongly suggests that of the gas
in question, or by so thoroughly associating a totally different odor with a
particular “gas” in normal use that, when used alone, it still seems to imply
the presence of that gas. This use of imitation gas would thus be of service
in economizing the use of actual “gas” or in the preparation of surprise
attacks.
While there was some success with this kind of “gas,” very few such
attacks were really carried out, and these were in connection with projector
attacks.

Gases Used
Table I gives a list of all the gases used by the various armies, the
nation which used them, the effect produced and the means of projection
used.
Table II gives the properties of the more important war cases (compiled
by Major R. E. Wilson, C. W. S.).
The gases used by the Germans may also be classified by the names
of the shell in which they were used. Table III gives such a classification.

Markings for American Shell


In selecting markings for American chemical shell, red bands were
used to denote persistency, white bands to denote non-persistency and
lethal properties, yellow bands to denote smoke, and purple bands to
denote incendiary action. The number of bands indicates the relative
strength of the property indicated; thus, three red bands denote a gas more
persistent than one red band.
The following shell markings were actually used:
1 White Diphenylchloroarsine
2 White Phosgene
1 White, 1 red Chloropicrin
1 White, 1 red, 1 75% Chloropicrin, 25% Phosgene
white
1 White, 1 red, 1 80% Chloropicrin, 20% Stannic
yellow Chloride
1 Red Bromoacetone
2 Red Bromobenzylcyanide
3 Red Mustard Gas
1 Yellow White Phosphorus
2 Yellow Titanium Tetrachloride

TABLE II
Physical Constants of Important War Gases
Liquid
Vapor
Density
Melting Boiling Pressure
Molecular at 20° C.
Name of Gas Formula point, point, at 20° C.
Weight under
°C. °C. (mm.
Own
Hg)
Pressure
Liquid
Vapor
Density
Melting Boiling Pressure
Molecular at 20° C.
Name of Gas Formula point, point, at 20° C.
Weight under
°C. °C. (mm.
Own
Hg)
Pressure
Bromoacetone C₃H₅BrO 136.98 1.7(?) - 54 126 9(?)
Carbon monoxide CO 28.00 (Gas) -207 -190 (Gas)
Cyanogen bromide BrCN 106.02 2.01 52 61.3 89
Cyanogen chloride ClCN 61.56 1.186 -6 15 1002
Chlorine Cl₂ 70.92 1.408 -101.5 33.6 5126
Chloropicrin Cl₃C(NO₂) 164.39 1.654 - 69.2 112 18.9
Dichloroethyl sulfide (CH₃CHCl₂)S 169.06 1.274 12.5 216 .06
Diphenylchloroarsine (C₆H₅)₂AsCl 264.56 1.422 44 333 .0025
Hydrocyanic acid HCN 27.11 .697 - 14 26.1 603
Phenyldichloroarsine C₆H₅AsCl₂ 210.96 1.640 ... 253 .022
Phosgene COCl₂ 98.92 1.38 ... 8.2 1215
Stannic chloride SnCl₄ 260.54 2.226 - 33 114 18.58
Superpalite CCl₃COOCl 197.85 1.65 ... 128 10.3
(
Xylyl bromide CH₃)C₆H₄CH₂Br 185.03 1.381 -2 214.5 ...

TABLE III
German Shell
Nature of
Name of Shell Shell Filling
Effect
B-shell [K₁ shell (White B or BM)] Bromoketone Lachrymator
(Bromomethylethyl ketone)
Blue Cross (a) Diphenylchloroarsine Sternutator
(b) Diphenylcyanoarsine Sternutator
(c) Diphenylchloroarsine,
Ethyl carbazol
C-shell (Green Cross) (White C) Superpalite Asphyxiant
D-shell (White D) Phosgene Lethal
(a) Superpalite
Green Cross Asphyxiant
(b) Phenylcarbylaminechloride
Superpalite 65%,
Green Cross 1 Asphyxiant
Chloropicrin 35%
Nature of
Name of Shell Shell Filling
Effect
Superpalite,
Green Cross 2 Phosgene, Asphyxiant
Diphenylchloroarsine
Green Cross 3 Ethyldichloroarsine,
(Yellow Cross 1) Methyldibromoarsine, Asphyxiant
Dichloromethyl ether
K-shell (Yellow) Chloromethylchloroformate Asphyxiant
(Palite)
Xylyl bromide,
T-shell (Black or green T) Lachrymator
Bromo ketone
Mustard gas,
Yellow Cross Vesicant
Diluent (CCl₄, C₆H₅Cl, C₆H₅NO₂)
Yellow Cross 1 See Green Cross 3
CHAPTER III
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHEMICAL WARFARE
SERVICE

Modern chemical warfare dates from April 22, 1915. Really,


however, it may be said to have started somewhat earlier, for
Germany undoubtedly had spent several months in perfecting a
successful gas cylinder and a method of attack. The Allies, surprised
by such a method of warfare, were forced to develop, under
pressure, a method of defense, and then, when it was finally decided
to retaliate, a method of gas warfare. “Offensive organizations were
enrolled in the Engineer Corps of the two armies and trained for the
purpose of using poisonous gases; the first operation of this kind
was carried out by the British at the battle of Loos in September,
1915.
“Shortly after this the British Army in the field amalgamated all the
offensive, defensive, advisory and supply activities connected with
gas warfare and formed a ‘Gas Service’ with a Brigadier General as
Director. This step was taken almost as a matter of necessity, and
because of the continually increasing importance of the use of gas in
the war (Auld).”
At once the accumulation of valuable information and experience
was started. Later this was very willingly and freely placed at the
disposal of American workers. Too much cannot be said about the
hearty co-operation of England and France. Without it and the later
exchange of information on all matters regarding gas warfare, the
progress of gas research in all the allied countries would have been
very much retarded.
While many branches of the American Army were engaged in
following the progress of the war during 1915-1916, the growing
importance of gas warfare was far from being appreciated. When the
United States declared war on Germany April 6, 1917, there were a
few scattered observations on gas warfare in various offices of the
different branches, but there was no attempt at an organized survey
of the field, while absolutely no effort had been made by the War
Department to inaugurate research in a field that later had 2,000
men alone in pure research work. Equally important was the fact that
no branch of the Service had any idea of the practical methods of
gas warfare.
The only man who seemed to have the vision and the courage of
his convictions was Van H. Manning, Director of the Bureau of
Mines. Since the establishment of the Bureau in 1908 it had
maintained a staff of investigators studying poisonous and explosive
gases in mines, the use of self-contained breathing apparatus for
exploring mines filled with noxious gases, the treatment of men
overcome by gas, and similar problems. At a conference of the
Director of the Bureau with his Division Chiefs, on February 7, 1917,
the matter of national preparedness was discussed, and especially
the manner in which the Bureau could be of most immediate
assistance with its personnel and equipment. On February 8, the
Director wrote C. D. Walcott, Chairman of the Military Committee of
the National Research Council, pointing out that the Bureau of Mines
could immediately assist the Navy and the Army in developing, for
naval or military use, special oxygen breathing apparatus similar to
that used in mining. He also stated that the Bureau could be of aid in
testing types of gas masks used on the fighting lines, and had
available testing galleries at the Pittsburgh experiment station and an
experienced staff. Dr. Walcott replied on February 12 that he was
bringing the matter to the attention of the Military Committee.
A meeting was arranged between the Bureau and the War
College, the latter organization being represented by Brigadier
General Kuhn and Major L. P. Williamson. At this conference the War
Department enthusiastically accepted the offer of the Bureau of
Mines and agreed to support the work in every way possible.
The supervision of the research on gases was offered to Dr. G. A.
Burrell, for a number of years in charge of the chemical work done
by the Bureau in connection with the investigation of mine gases and
natural gas. He accepted the offer on April 7, 1917. The smoothness
with which the work progressed under his direction and the
importance of the results obtained were the result of Colonel
Burrell’s great tact, his knowledge of every branch of research under
investigation and his imagination and general broad-mindedness.
Once, however, that the importance of gas warfare had been
brought to the attention of the chemists of the country, the response
was very eager and soon many of the best men of the university and
industrial plants were associated with Burrell in all the phases of gas
research. The staff grew very rapidly and laboratories were started at
various points in the East and Middle West.
It was immediately evident that there should be a central
laboratory in Washington to co-ordinate the various activities and
also to considerably enlarge those activities under the joint direction
of the Army, the Navy and the Bureau of Mines. Fortunately a site
was available for such a laboratory at the American University, the
use of the buildings and grounds having been tendered President
Wilson on April 30, 1917. Thus originated the American University
Experiment Station, later to become the Research Division of the
Chemical Warfare Service.
Meanwhile other organizations were getting under way. The
procurement of toxic gases and the filling of shell was assigned to
the Trench Warfare Section of the Ordnance Department. In June,
1917, General Crozier, then Chief of the Ordnance Department,
approved the general proposition of building a suitable plant for filling
shell with toxic gas. In November, 1917, it was decided to establish
such a plant at Gunpowder Neck, Maryland. Owing to the inability of
the chemical manufacturers to supply the necessary toxic gases, it
was further decided, in December, 1917, to erect at the same place
such chemical plants as would be necessary to supply these gases.
In January, 1918, the name was changed to Edgewood Arsenal, and
the project was made a separate Bureau of the Ordnance
Department, Col. William H. Walker, of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, being soon afterwards put in command.
While, during the latter part of the War, gas shell were handled by
the regular artillery, special troops were needed for cylinder attacks,
Stokes’ mortars, Livens’ projectors and for other forms of gas
warfare. General Pershing early cabled, asking for the organization
and training of such troops, and recommended that they be placed,
as in the English Army, under the jurisdiction of the Engineer Corps.
On August 15, 1917, the General Staff authorized one regiment of
Gas and Flame troops, which was designated the “30th Engineers,”
and was commanded by Major (later Colonel) E. J. Atkisson. This
later became the First Gas Regiment, of the Chemical Warfare
Service.
About this time (September, 1917) the need of gas training was
recognized by the organization of a Field Training Section, under the
direction of the Sanitary Corps, Medical Department. Later it was
recognized that neither the Training Section nor the Divisional Gas
Officers should be under the Medical Department, and, in January,
1918, the organization was transferred to the Engineer Corps.
All of these, with the exception of the Gas and Flame regiment,
were for service on this side. The need for an Overseas force was
recognized and definitely stated in a letter, dated August 4, 1917. On
September 3, 1917, an order was issued establishing the Gas
Service, under the command of Lt. Col. (later Brigadier General) A.
A. Fries, as a separate Department of the A. E. F. in France. In spite
of a cable on September 26th, in which General Pershing had said
“Send at once chemical laboratory, complete
equipment and personnel, including physiological
and pathological sections, for extensive
investigation of gases and powders....”
it was not until the first of January, 1918, that Colonel R. F. Bacon of
the Mellon Institute sailed for France with about fifty men and a
complete laboratory equipment.
Meantime a Chemical Service Section had been organized in the
United States. This holds the distinction of being the first recognition
of chemistry as a separate branch of the military service in any
country or any war. This was authorized October 16, 1917, and was
to consist of an officer of the Engineers, not above the rank of
colonel, who was to be Director of Gas Service, with assistants, not
above the rank of lieutenant colonel from the Ordnance Department,
Medical Department and Chemical Service Section. The Section
itself was to consist of 47 commissioned and 95 non-commissioned
officers and privates. Colonel C. L. Potter, Corps of Engineers, was
appointed Director and Professor W. H. Walker was commissioned
Lieutenant Colonel and made Assistant Director of the Gas Service
and Chief of the Chemical Service Section. This was increased on
Feb. 15, 1918 to 227 commissioned and 625 enlisted men, and on
May 6, 1918 to 393 commissioned and 920 enlisted men. Meanwhile
Lt. Col. Walker had been transferred to the Ordnance and Lt. Col.
Bogert had been appointed in his place.
At this time practically every branch of the Army had some
connection with Gas Warfare. The Medical Corps directed the Gas
Defense production. Offense production was in the hands of the
Ordnance Department. Alarm devices, etc., were made by the Signal
Corps. The Engineers contributed their 30th Regiment (Gas and
Flame) and the Field Training Section. The Research Section was
still in charge of the Bureau of Mines, in spite of repeated attempts to
militarize it. And in addition, the Chemical Service Section had been
formed primarily to deal with overseas work. While the Director of the
Gas Service was expected to co-ordinate all these activities, he was
given no authority to control policy, research or production.
In order to improve these conditions Major General Wm. L.
Sibert, a distinguished Engineer Officer who built the Gatun Locks
and Dam of the Panama Canal and who had commanded the First
Division in France, was appointed Director of the Chemical Warfare
Service on May 11, 1918. Under his direction the Chemical Warfare
Service was organized with the following Divisions:
Brigadier General Amos A.
Overseas
Fries
Research Colonel G. A. Burrell
Development Colonel F. M. Dorsey
Gas Defense Colonel Bradley Dewey
Production
Gas Offense Colonel Wm. H. Walker
Production
Medical Colonel W. J. Lyster
Proving Lt. Col. W. S. Bacon
Brigadier General H. C.
Administration
Newcomer
Gas and Flame Colonel E. J. Atkisson
The final personnel authorized, though never reached owing to
the signing of the Armistice, was 4,066 commissioned officers and
44,615 enlisted men; this was including three gas regiments of
eighteen companies each.
General Sibert brought with him not only an extended experience
in organizing and conducting big business, but a strong sympathy for
the work and an appreciation of the problem that the American Army
was facing in France. He very quickly welded the great organization
of the Chemical Warfare Service into a whole, and saw to it that each
department not only carried on its own duties but co-operated with
the others in carrying out the larger program, which, had the war
continued, would have beaten the German at his own game.
More detailed accounts will now be given of the various Divisions
of the Chemical Warfare Service.

Administration Division
The Administration Division was the result of the development
which has been sketched in the preceding pages. It is not necessary
to review that, but the organization as of October 19, 1918 will be
given:
Director Major General Wm.
L. Sibert
Staff:
Medical Officer Colonel W. J. Lyster
Ordnance Officer Lt. Col. C. B.
Thummel
British Military Mission Major J. H. Brightman
Colonel H. C.
Assistant Director
Newcomer
Office Administration Major W. W. Parker
Relations Section Colonel M. T. Bogert
Personnel Section Major F. E. Breithut
Contracts and Patents Captain W. K.
Section Jackson
Finance Section Major C. C. Coombs
Requirements and Progress Capt. S. M. Cadwell
Section
Confidential Information Major S. P. Mullikin
Section
Captain H. B.
Transportation Section
Sharkey
Training Section Lt. Col. G. N. Lewis
Procurement Section Lt. Col. W. J. Noonan
The administrative offices were located in the Medical
Department Building. The function of most of the sections is
indicated by their names.
The Industrial Relations Section was created to care for the
interests of the industrial plants which were considered as essential
war industries. Through its activity many vitally important industries
were enabled to retain, on deferred classification or on indefinite
furlough, those skilled chemists without which they could not have
maintained a maximum output of war munitions.
In the same way the University Relations Section cared for the
educational and research institutions. In this way our recruiting
stations for chemists were kept in as active operation as war
conditions permitted.
Another important achievement of the Administration Section was
to secure the order from The Adjutant General, dated May 28, 1918,
that read:

“Owing to the needs of the military service for a


great many men trained in chemistry, it is
considered most important that all enlisted men who
are graduate chemists should be assigned to duty
where their special knowledge and training can be
fully utilized.
“Enlisted men who are graduate chemists will
not be sent overseas unless they are to be
employed on chemical duties....”

While this undoubtedly created a great deal of feeling among the


men who naturally were anxious to see actual fighting in France, it
was very important that this order be carried out in order to conserve
our chemical strength. The following clipping from the September,
1918, issue of The Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
shows the result of this order.

“Chemists in Camp
“As the result of the letter from The Adjutant
General of the Army, dated May 28, 1918, 1,749
chemists have been reported on. Of these the report
of action to August 1, 1918, shows that 281 were
ordered to remain with their military organization
because they were already performing chemical
duties, 34 were requested to remain with their
military organization because they were more useful
in the military work which they were doing, 12 were
furloughed back to industry, 165 were not chemists
in the true sense of the word and were, therefore,
ordered back to the line, and 1,294 now placed in
actual chemical work. There were being held for
further investigation of their qualifications on August
1, 1918, 432 men. The remaining 23 men were
unavailable for transfer, because they had already
received their overseas orders.
“The 1,294 men, who would otherwise be
serving in a purely military capacity and whose
chemical training is now being utilized in chemical
work, have, therefore, been saved from waste.
“Each case has been considered individually, the
man’s qualifications and experience have been
studied with care, the needs of the Government
plants and bureaus have been considered with
equal care, and each man has been assigned to the
position for which his training and qualifications
seem to fit him best.
“Undoubtedly, there have been some cases in
which square pegs have been fitted into round
holes, but, on the whole, it is felt that the
adjustments have been as well as could be
expected under the circumstances.”

Research Division
The American University Experiment Station, established by the
Bureau of Mines in April, 1917, became July 1, 1918 the Research
Division of the Chemical Warfare Service. For the first five months
work was carried out in various laboratories, scattered over the
country. In September, 1917, the buildings of the American
University became available; a little later portions of the new
chemical laboratory of the Catholic University, Washington, were
taken over. Branch laboratories were established in many of the
laboratories of the Universities and industrial plants, of which Johns
Hopkins, Princeton, Yale, Ohio State, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Harvard, Michigan, Columbia, Cornell, Wisconsin, Clark,
Bryn Mawr, Nela Park and the National Carbon Company were
active all through the war.
At the time of the signing of the armistice the organization of the
Research Division was as follows:
Col. G. A. Burrell Chief of Research Division
Dr. W. K. Lewis In Charge of Defense Problems
Dr. E. P. Kohler[5] In Charge of Offense Problems
Dr. Reid Hunt Advisor on Pharmacological Problems
In Charge of Editorial Work and Catalytic
Lt. Col. W. D. Bancroft
Research
Lt. Col. A. B. Lamb[6] In Charge of Defense Chemical Research
Dr. L. W. Jones[7] In Charge of Offense Chemical Research
Major A. C. Fieldner In Charge of Gas Mask Research
Major G. A. Richter In Charge of Pyrotechnic Research
Capt. E. K. Marshall[8] In Charge of Pharmacological Research
Dr. A. S. Loevenhart[9] In Charge of Toxicological Research
Major R. C. Tolman In Charge of Dispersoid Research
Major W. S. In Charge of Small Scale Manufacture
Rowland[10]
In Charge of Mechanical Research and
Major B. B. Fogler[11] Development
Captain G. A. Rankin In Charge of Explosive Research
Major Richmond In Charge of Administration Section
Levering

The chief functions of the Research Division were:


1. To prepare and test compounds which might
be of value in gas warfare, determining the
properties of these substances and the conditions
under which they might be effective in warfare.
2. To develop satisfactory methods of making
such compounds as seemed promising (Small
Scale).
3. To develop the best methods of utilizing these
compounds.
4. To develop materials which should absorb or
destroy war gases, studying their properties and
determining the conditions under which they might
be effective.
5. To develop satisfactory methods of making
such absorbents as might seem promising.
6. To develop masks, canisters, protective
clothing, etc.
7. To develop incendiaries, smokes, signals, etc.,
and the best methods of using the same.
Fig. 4.—American University Experiment Station,
showing Small Scale Plants.

8. To co-operate with the manufacturing divisions


in regard to difficulties arising during the operations
of manufacturing war gases, absorbents, etc.
9. To co-operate with other branches of the
Government, civil and military, in regard to war
problems.
10. To collect and make available to the Director
of the Chemical Warfare Service all information in
regard to the chemistry of gas warfare.
The relation of the various sections may best be shown by
outlining the general procedure used when a new toxic substance
was developed.
The substance in question may have been used by the Germans
or the Allies; it may have been suggested by someone outside the
station; or the staff may have thought of it from a search of the
literature, from analogy or from pure inspiration. The Offense
Research Section made the substance. If it was a solid it was sent to
the Dispersoid Section, where methods of dispersing it were worked
out. When this had been done, or, at once, if the compound was a
liquid or vapor, it was sent to the Toxicological Section to be tested
for toxicity, lachrymatory power, vesicant action, or other special
properties. If these tests proved the compound to have a high toxicity
or a peculiar physiological behavior, it was then turned over to a
number of different sections.
The Offense Research Section tried to improve the method of
preparation. When a satisfactory method had been found, the
Chemical Production or Small Scale Manufacturing Section
endeavored to make it on a large scale (50 pounds to a ton) and
worked out the manufacturing difficulties. If further tests showed that
the substance was valuable, the manufacture was then given to the
Development Division or the Gas Offense Production Division for
large scale production.
Meanwhile the Analytical Section had been working on a method
for testing the purity of the material and for analyzing air mixtures,
and the Gas Mask Section had run tests against it with the standard
canisters. If the protection afforded did not seem sufficient, the
Defense Chemical Section studied changes in the ingredients of the
canister or even developed a new absorbent or mixture of
absorbents to meet the emergency. If a change in the mechanical
construction of the canister was necessary, this was referred to the
Mechanical Research Section; this work was especially important in
case the material was to be used as a toxic smoke.
The compound was also sent to the Pyrotechnic Section, which
studied its behavior when fired from a shell, or, if suitable, when used
in a cylinder. If it proved stable on detonation, large field tests were
then made by the Proving Division, in connection with the
Pyrotechnic and Toxicological Sections of the Research Division, to
learn the effect when shell loaded with the compound were fired from
guns on a range, with animals placed suitably in or near the
trenches. The Analytical Section worked out methods of detecting
the gas in the field, wherever possible.
The Medical Division, working with the Toxicological and
Pharmacological Sections, studied pathological details, methods of
treating gassed cases, the effect of the gas on the body, and in some
cases even considered other questions, such as the susceptibility of
different men.
If the question of an ointment or clothing entered into the matter
of protection, these were usually attacked by several Sections from
different points of view.
Out of the 250 gases prepared by the Offense Chemical
Research Section, very few were sufficiently valuable to pass all of
these tests and thus the number of gases actually put into large
scale production were less than a dozen. This had its advantages,
for it made unnecessary a large number of factories and the training
of men in the manufacturing details of many gases. As one British
report stated, “The ultimate object of chemical warfare should be to
produce two substances only; one persistent and the other non-
persistent; both should be lethal and both should be penetrants.”
They might well have added that both should be instantly and
powerfully lachrymatory.
Since most of the work of the Research Division will be covered
in detail in later chapters, only a brief summary of the principal
problems will be given here.
The first and most important problem was the development of a
gas mask. This was before Sections had been organized and was
the work of the entire Division. After comparing the existing types of
masks it was decided that the Standard Box Respirator of the British
was the best one to copy. Because we were entirely new at the
game that meant work on charcoal, soda-lime, and the various
mechanical parts of the mask, such as the facepiece, elastics,
eyepieces, mouthpiece, noseclip, hose, can, valves, etc. The story of
the “first twenty thousand” is very well told by Colonel Burrell.[12]

“The First Twenty Thousand


“About the first of May, 1917, Major L. P.
Williamson, acting as liaison officer between the

You might also like