WP2

Prof. Klaus Berner : Ing ‐ David Izabel ‐

Work Package 2
« End user focussed design strategies »

– Comparison
Design by calculation
/ Design by testing –
Roma congres
22 Septembre 2011 1
 WP2 ‐ Work package programme ‐

- Task 2.1 State of the art (SNPPA)

- Task 2.2 Experimental programme (UKA)

- Task 2.3 Validation+ calculation EN 14509 (IS Mainz)

- Task 2.4 Design by testing guideline (SNPPA)

- Task 2.5 Development of an Excel software (SNPPA)

- Task 2.6 Dissemination of new design method (PI)

22/09/2011 2
 WP2 – Deliverables:
The background of the Design By Testing ‐

- D 2.1 Thermal test methods

- D 2.2 Parametric study to compare DBT and DBC

- D 2.3 Theoretical guidelines

- D 2.4 Examples

- D 2.5 Excel softwares

- D 2.6 Principles for an annex DBT at the EN 14509

22/09/2011 3
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Aim

Source K Berner

Same Aim :
The design of
Cladding, roofing,
ceiling, partition made
of sandwich panels based
on the ULS and SLS
limit states

22/09/2011 4
 WP2 – Comparison DBT /DBC : The principles

The same principle for Source K Berner

Design By Testing and Design By Calculation

A difference
DBT : Works in efforts (M, V…)
DBC : Works in stresses (σw; τ)

22/09/2011 5
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Rd

Design of the value resistance: Rd

22/09/2011 6
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : The tests

No difference

Panel on 2 supports

Same loading

Condition
of support
different

22/09/2011 7
 WP2 – Comparison DBT /DBC : The tests

Test
different

Panel on 3 supports

Test
different

22/09/2011 8
 WP2 – Comparison DBT /DBC : The tests

Supports

Assembly

22/09/2011 9
 WP2 – Comparison DBT /DBC : The tests

Thermal aspects

Equivalent

22/09/2011 10
 WP2 – Comparison DBT /DBC : The tests

Thermal aspects

new
test
different

More for research than for industrial application

22/09/2011 11
 WP2 – Comparison DBT /DBC : The tests
Thermal aspects

new
test
different

22/09/2011 12
 WP2 ‐ Comparison DBT /DBC : Strength capacities

Interpretation
of the
tests results
equivalent

22/09/2011 13
 WP2 ‐ Comparison DBT/DBC : Strength capacities

22/09/2011 14
 WP2 ‐ Comparison DBT/DBC : Formula

Strength of Formula used to find the loads

(Bending moment Shear, and stresses)

(To see more see Deliverable 2.3 Theoretical guidelines)

22/09/2011 15
 WP2 ‐ Comparison DBT/DBC : Formula Flat panel
1 span
Design By Testing and Design By Calculation

No difference

22/09/2011 16
 WP2 ‐ Comparison DBT/DBC : Formula Flat panel
2 spans
Design By testing Design By Calculation

Not the same

test

22/09/2011 17
 WP2 ‐ Comparison DBT/DBC : Formula Flat panel
2 spans
Design By testing Design By Calculation

Not the same

No difference
test

22/09/2011 18
 WP2 ‐ Comparison DBT/DBC : Formula Rib panel
2 spans
Design By Testing Design By Calculation

22/09/2011 19
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Sd

Design of the value resistance: Sd

22/09/2011 20
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Mechanical

No difference

Source K Berner

Difference on the
residual
bending moment
on the central
support

22/09/2011 21
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Combinations

Load combinations

Combinations considered
DBT and DBC

A difference
DBT : combination of efforts (M, V…)
DBC : combination of stresses (σw; τ)
Source K Berner

22/09/2011 22
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Thermal Aspects

Several load cases to be considered

Source K Berner

22/09/2011 23
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Synthesis

Synthesis

22/09/2011 24
 WP2 ‐ Comparison DBT/DBC : Summary

Tests Bending shear Strength Strength Load tables

rigidities Capacities (ULS) Capacities (SLS) (Combinations)

To see more see 31 examples in Deliverable 2.4 25

 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Results

Results
After application via EASIE
on
PU Roof panel
PU and MW cladding panels
(To see more see Deliverable 2.2 Parametric study )

22/09/2011 26
 WP2 ‐ Comparaison DBT/DBC : Results

PU Roof panel on 2 supports in pression without thermal gradient (Informative)

Panel 1001Ts on 2 supports in pression - thickness 60 mm -

k = 0,85 - Calculated rigidities

400

350

300 Dbt
Load (daN/m²)

250
Polska
200

150 French

100
EN14509
50

0
0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 5,00

span (m)

22/09/2011 27
 WP2 ‐ Comparaison DBT/DBC : Results

PU Roof panel on 2 supports in pression without thermal gradient (informative)

Panel 1001TS on 2 supports - Thickness 100 mm -

k = 0,85 - Calculated rigidities

600

500
Load (daN/m²)

400
Dbt

300 Polska

French
200
EN14509

100

0
0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 5,00

Span (m)

22/09/2011 28
 WP2 ‐ Comparaison DBT/DBC : Results

PU Roof panel on 3 supports in pression without thermal gradient (Informative)

DBT

Polska

French

DBC

22/09/2011 29
 WP2 ‐ Comparaison DBT/DBC : Results

PU Roof panel on 2 supports in pression with thermal gradient

PU roof panel on 2 supports in pression - Thickness 100 mm-

with thermal gradient 40°C - k = 0,95 -

250
Load (daN/m²)

200
DBT
150
DBC (DI)
100
DBC (ISM)
50
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Span (m)

For details of calculation see Deliverable 2.4

22/09/2011 30
WP2 ‐ Comparaison DBT/DBC : Results
PU Roof panel on 3 supports in pression with thermal gradient (55°C in Winter and 40°C
Summer) creep coefficient 7

PU roof Panel in 3 supports (snow) - Thickness 100 mm -

with thermal gradient (55 S and 40 W) creep 7 - K =0,9 -

200
Load (daN/m²)

150
DBT
100
DBC (Ismainz)
50

0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Span (m)

For details of calculation see Deliverable 2.4

22/09/2011 31
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Software

Results
Practical way
Excel software's for both design
by calculation and design by
testing
(To see more see Deliverable 2.5 Excel software )

22/09/2011 32
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Software

22/09/2011 33
 WP2 – Comparison DBT/DBC : Conclusions

Conclusions:
• => DBT based on a solid background with EASIE project
• => DBT / DBC based on the same principles
• => DBT /DBC same level of safety
• => 2 complementary approaches
• => DBT/DBC Results identical for the panel on 2 supports
• =>Some benefits with the design by testing when residual
moment occur (panel on 3 supports)
• => Next stage discussions in TC128 SC11 WG5 and WG1 to
include the DBT in the EN 14509
22/09/2011 34