Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organizational Behavior 13Th Edition Bien Solutions Manual Full Chapter PDF
Organizational Behavior 13Th Edition Bien Solutions Manual Full Chapter PDF
Chapter 7
THE NATURE OF TEAMS
STUDY QUESTIONS
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
This chapter focuses on the nature of teams in organizations. The chapter begins by defining the term
“team,” as a group of people working together to achieve a common purpose for which they hold
themselves collectively accountable. It discusses how teams in organizations serve different purposes—
some teams run things, some teams recommend things, and some teams make or do things. Organizations
can be viewed as interlocking networks of permanent teams such as project teams and cross-functional
teams, as well as temporary teams such as committees and task forces. The chapter then discusses when a
team is effective by achieving high levels of task accomplishment, member satisfaction, and viability to
perform successfully over the long term. Teams help organizations through synergy in task performance,
the creation of a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts. Teams help satisfy important needs for
their members by providing them with things like job support and social interactions. The stages of team
development – forming, storming, forming, performing, adjourning – and their somewhat distinct
management problems are covered followed by a description of how teams work.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS
Teams and Teamwork
What Teams Do
Organizations as Networks of Teams
Cross-Functional and Problem-Solving Teams
Self-Managing Teams
Virtual Teams
TEAM EFFECTIVENESS
Criteria of an Effective Team
Synergy and Team Benefits
Social Facilitation
Social Loafing and Team Problems
LO 1: TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS
• A team is a group of people brought together to use their complementary skills to achieve a common
purpose for which they are collectively accountable.
• Teamwork occurs when team members accept and live up to their collective accountability by
actively working together so that all their respective skills are best used to achieve important goals.
What Teams Do
• A formal team is created and officially designated to serve specific organizational purposes.
• Permanent and ongoing teams include departments (e.g., market research department), divisions (e.g.,
consumer products division), or teams (e.g., product-assembly team) and can vary in size from very
small departments or teams of just a few people to large divisions employing a hundred or more
people.
• Temporary and short-lived teams include those created to solve specific problems or perform defined
tasks and include the many temporary committees and task forces that are important components of
any organization.
LECTURE ENHANCEMENT
Discuss with students the various formal teams to which they belong, or have belonged.
• Informal groups are unofficial and emerge to serve special interests. Two types of informal groups
include:
1. Friendship groups which consist of persons with natural affinities for one another. They tend to
work together, sit together, take breaks together, and even do things together outside of the
workplace.
2. Interest groups which consist of persons who share common interests. These may be job-related
interests, such as an intense desire to learn more about computers, or nonwork interests, such as
community service, sports, or religion.
• Social network analysis identifies the informal structures and their embedded social relationships that
are active in an organization.
• A cross-functional team consists of members assigned from different functional departments or work
units. It plays an important role in efforts to achieve more horizontal integration and better lateral
relations.
• Cross-functional teams are a way of trying to beat the functional silos problem, also called the
functional chimneys problem. This problem occurs when members of functional units stay focused on
matters internal to their function and minimize their interactions with members dealing with other
functions.
• Problem-solving teams are created temporarily to serve a specific purpose by dealing with a specific
problem or opportunity. They exist as the many committees, task forces, and special project teams
that are common facts of working life.
• Employee involvement teams are a wide variety of teams whose members meet regularly to
collectively examine important workplace issues such as ways to enhance quality, better satisfy
customers, raise productivity, and improve the quality of work life. A quality circle is an example of
such a team that works on problems relating to quality and productivity.
Self-Managing Teams
• Self-managing teams (sometimes called self-directed work teams) are high-involvement work-groups
empowered to make the decisions needed to manage themselves on a day-to-day basis. It is important
that members are good at multiskilling, meaning they are able to perform many different jobs—even
all of the team’s jobs—as needed.
• Figure 7.1 in the textbook shows that members of true self-managing teams make their own decisions
about scheduling work, allocating tasks, training for job skills, evaluating performance, selecting new
team members, and controlling the quality of work.
• Expected benefits of self-managing teams:
o Better work quality
o Production flexibility and faster response to technological change
o Reduced absenteeism and turnover
o Improved work attitudes and quality of work life
• Potential difficulties of self-managing teams:
o It may be hard for some team members to adjust to the “self-managing” responsibilities
o Higher level managers may have problems dealing with the loss of the first-line supervisor
positions
Virtual Teams
The virtual team is one whose members work through computer mediation
LO 2: TEAM EFFECTIVENESS
An effective team is one that achieves high levels of task performance, member satisfaction, and team
viability.
• Task performance ⎯ an effective group achieves its performance goals in the standard sense of
quantity, quality, and timeliness of work results.
• Member satisfaction ⎯ an effective group is one whose members believe that their participation and
experiences are positive and meet important personal needs.
• Team viability ⎯ an effective group has members who are sufficiently satisfied to continue working
well together on an ongoing basis and/or look forward to working together again at some future point
in time.
LECTURE ENHANCEMENT
A good way to expose students to the nature of effective groups is to ask them how they feel about
participating in groups. You will usually receive both highly positive and highly negative opinions.
Students who have been members of successful athletic, social, extracurricular, class-based, and/or work
groups will likely have quite positive attitudes. Those with less favorable experiences, such as students
who have encountered nonproductive groups in their classes, will likely be more skeptical of the utility of
groups and teams. For these students, the quip “A camel is a horse designed by a committee!” may ring
true. Point out that despite their potential drawbacks, groups and teams are an essential organizational
resource that all organizational members ⎯ but especially managers and leaders ⎯ must understand in
order to tap their full potential.
Effective groups offer the potential for synergy ⎯ the creation of a whole that is greater than the sum of
the parts.
Teams often have performance advantages over individuals acting alone in following situations:
1. When there is no clear expert in a particular task or problem.
2. When problems are complex, requiring a division of labor and the sharing of information.
3. Teams can be more creative and innovative because of their tendencies to make riskier decisions.
Social Facilitation
Social facilitation is the tendency for one’s behavior to be influenced by the presence of others in a group
or social setting.
Social facilitation theory indicates that working in the presence of others creates an emotional arousal or
excitement that stimulates behavior and therefore affects performance.
• Arousal tends to work positively when a person is proficient with the task.
• Arousal tends to work negatively when the task is not well learned.
Social loafing, also known as the Ringelmann effect, is the tendency of people to work less hard in a
group than they would individually.
People may not work hard in groups for the following reasons:
• Their individual contributions are less noticeable in the group context.
• They prefer to see others carry the workload.
Figure 7.2 in the textbook describes the five stages of team development as forming, storming, norming,
performing, and adjourning.
Forming Stage
• In the forming stage of group development, a primary concern is the initial entry of members to a
group.
• Members are interested in getting to know each other and discovering what is considered acceptable
behavior, in determining the real task of the group, and in defining group rules.
Storming Stage
• The storming stage of group development is a period of high emotionality and tension among the
group members.
• Hostility and infighting may occur, the group typically experiences many changes, and coalitions or
cliques may form
• Members’ expectations tend to be clarified, and attention shifts toward obstacles standing in the way
of group goals.
• Individuals begin to understand one another’s interpersonal styles.
• Efforts are made to find ways to accomplish group goals while satisfying individual needs.
Norming Stage
• The norming stage of group development, sometimes called initial integration, is the point at which
the group begins to come together as a coordinated unit.
• The turmoil of the storming stage gives way to a precarious balancing of forces.
• Group members strive to maintain a positive balance and the desire for group harmony may obscure
group problems.
• Some members may mistake norming as the stage of ultimate maturity.
Performing Stage
• The performing stage, sometimes called total integration, marks the emergence of a mature,
organized, and well-functioning group.
• Complex tasks and internal disagreements are handled in creative ways.
• Members are motivated by group goals and are generally satisfied.
• The primary challenges are continued efforts to improve relationships and performance.
• Group members are able to adapt successfully to changing opportunities and demands.
• A group that has achieved total integration will reflect the maturity end of the ten continua that are
shown in Figure 7.3 from the textbook.
Adjourning Stage
• In the adjourning stage, a well-integrated group is able to disband, if required, with its work is
accomplished.
• The adjourning stage is especially important for temporary groups.
• The willingness to disband when the job is done and to work well together in future responsibilities,
group or otherwise, is an important long-run test of group success.
LECTURE ENHANCEMENT
Ask students to describe their experiences with different teams within the context of stages of group
development. What happened for them at each stage? How do the students’ experiences compare to the
ideas presented above? Did anyone have an experience wherein the group seemed to get stuck at one
particular stage ⎯ say, the storming stage? What happened, and what insights does it provide?
Figure 7.4 in the textbook shows team effectiveness being influenced by both inputs—“right players in
the right seats,” and by processes—“on the same bus, headed in the same direction.”
LECTURE ENHANCEMENT
If you have assigned group projects to your students, be sure to relate the open systems model in Figure
7.4 to their group experiences. Throughout your discussion, ask students to indicate how the various
group inputs (i.e., tasks; goals, rewards, and resources; technology; membership diversity; and group size)
and group processes (i.e., group and intergroup dynamics) affected their group performance, satisfaction,
and future viability.
• Appropriate goals, well-designed reward systems, adequate resources, and appropriate technology are
all essential to support the work of teams.
• Team performance can suffer when resources—information, budgets, work space, deadlines, rules
and procedures, technologies, and the like—are insufficient to accomplish the task. By contrast,
having a supportive organizational setting within which to work can be a strong launching pad for
team success.
Tasks place different demands on groups, with varying implications for group effectiveness.
• The technical demands of a group’s task include its routineness, difficulty, and information
requirements.
• The social demands of a task involve relationships, ego involvement, controversies over ends and
means, and the like.
• Tasks that are complex in technical demands require unique solutions and more information
processing.
• Tasks that are complex in social demands involve difficulties reaching agreement on goals or
methods for accomplishing them.
Team Size
The size of a team, as measured by the number of its members, can make a difference in a team’s
effectiveness.
• As a team becomes larger, more people are available to divide up the work and accomplish needed
tasks, which can increase performance and member satisfaction, but only up to a point.
• As a team size continues to grow, communication and coordination problems often set in, and in turn
satisfaction may decline while turnover, absenteeism, social loafing, and team logistical problems
may increase.
• A good size for problem-solving teams is between five and seven members.
Team Composition
Team composition is the mix of abilities, skills, backgrounds, and experiences that the members bring to
the team.
• FIRO-B theory (with “FIRO” standing for fundamental interpersonal orientation) identifies
differences in how people relate to one another in teams based on their needs to express and receive
feelings of inclusion, control, and affection.
• In homogeneous teams, members may find it very easy to work together but they may also suffer
performance limitations if their collective skills, experiences and perspectives are not a good match
for complex skills.
• In heterogeneous teams, a wide pool of talent and viewpoints is available for problem solving but this
diversity may also create difficulties as members try to define problems, share information, and
handle interpersonal conflicts.
• Status congruence occurs when a person’s position within the group is equivalent in status to
positions held outside of the group. Status is a person’s relative rank, prestige, or standing in a group.
Team Diversity
• Team diversity in the form of different values, personalities, experiences, demographics, and cultures
among the members, is an important team input.
• In homogeneous teams where members are very similar to one another, teamwork usually isn’t much
of a problem. The members typically find it quite easy to work together and enjoy the team
experience.
• In heterogeneous teams where members are very dissimilar, teamwork problems are more likely. The
mix of diverse personalities, experiences, backgrounds, ages, and other personal characteristics may
create difficulties as members try to define problems, share information, mobilize talents, and deal
with obstacles or opportunities.
• Diverse teams have more resources and viewpoints available to engage in problem solving, especially
when tasks are complex and demanding. Yet these advantages are not automatic; the diversity must
be tapped if the team is to realize the performance benefits.
• Diversity–consensus dilemma is the tendency for diversity in groups to create process difficulties
even as it offers improved potential for problem solving.
• This diversity and performance relationship is apparent in interesting research newly reported
in the area of collective intelligence – the ability of a group or team to perform well across a
range of tasks.
• Figure 7.5 in the textbook illustrates member diversity, stages of team development, and team
performance.
• Group dynamics refer to the forces operating in groups that affect the way members relate to and
work with one another.
LECTURE ENHANCEMENT
If you have assigned group projects to your students, have them describe their required and emergent
behaviors.
KEY TERMS
SPECIAL FEATURES
OB in Popular Culture
In the ever popular reality show Survivor, individual players must balance cunning and competitiveness
against the need for teamwork and collaboration. In Season 10, Willard Smith finds himself a member of
the successful Koror tribe. Willard’s contributions are limited, so his tribe assigns him to tend the fire at
night. Instead of fulfilling his obligation, Willard sleeps in the only hammock available. When morning
comes, eventual winner Tom Westman complains about losing sleep because he has to “cover” for
Willard. Westman’s assessment of Willard’s motives was “why should I do it if somebody else is going
to do it for me?” shows that social loafing can be a difficult problem to address even when others know it
is happening.
Have students recall if they have ever been part of a team where one member did not contribute at
all/as much as the other team members and instead engaged in social loafing. What if anything did the
other team members do in that situation? What are some ways to prevent social loafing in teams?
Research Insight- Membership, Interactions, and Evaluation Influence Social Loafing in Groups
Research on social loafing suggests a link between decision making, organizational justice, and social
loafing in groups. Findings of the study indicate that social loafing was not significantly related to the use
of evaluation structures that identified individual contributions, was negatively related to perceived
fairness of group processes, and was positively related to perceived dispensability of one’s contributions.
In addition, the relationship between social loafing and perceived dispensability strengthened when
individual contributions were more identifiable.
Bringing OB to Life
When you put the headphones at work on and tune in some nice sounds, are you tuning out team spirit?
That’s a question that is finding its way into more and more work settings. Maybe it’s a generation y
thing. Maybe it’s just the influence of new technology on everyday living. Headphones are as common in
some offices as they are on the streets. But, when someone puts the headphones on the signal being
broadcast – intended or not--may be: Don’t disturb! Ask students how they see and should react to such
situation at work.
Group Project
Assign students randomly to groups of four. Hopefully, the students will end up with classmates with
whom they do not usually do group work. Next, have the students meet as a group and come up with a
name that reflects something they all have in common. For example: “The snowboarders” or “The middle
children” or “The pasta lovers.” Students should have to exchange a great deal of information to find this
common ground. (Tell them they cannot choose and easy name like “The university students” or “The
residents of your city.”
Next, reassign the students to new random groups and have them do the same thing on-line before the
next class period. In the following class, discuss the differences in their communication network (Figure
8.5) and their effectiveness in each medium.
OB IN ACTION
CASE SUMMARY
This case presents issues of teamwork, group process, group norms, leadership, motivation, conflict, and
conflict resolution.
Christine Spencer is concerned about her organizational behavior group work project. The
allotted mark will be given to the team as a whole, and her group is experiencing difficulties with one of
its members, Mike. During the initial group meeting, Mike appeared to get along with everyone, and
seemed jovial and content. However, once the time came to begin meetings about the OB assignment,
Mike frequently could not make meetings, saying he had to work and only sending brief rough notes
along for his contribution. He avoided the group at times, but became angry and defensive when he
thought that they were meeting without him. A week later, Mike had phoned Christine and explained that
he had been having problems with his girlfriend, on top of the pressure of his course load and his job.
Although Christine empathized with him, she was concerned about the group, the project and her mark,
and wondered how to deal with the situation.
Christine should consider discussing this with the rest of the group, and then discuss the problem
with Mike. This is part of the group process that does not appear to have happened yet. They cannot go to
the instructor before attempting to address the situation themselves first. They need to figure out how to
motivate Mike, despite his obvious pressures.
1. How could an understanding of the stages of group development assist Christine in leadership
situations such as this one?
Groups pass through various stages of development and the nature of the problems faced by group
members and leadership varies from stage to stage. In the first place, Christine should have used her
leadership role to better prepare the group to work together. This means that more attention should have
been given to the forming stage. Here and during the next stage of storming, the members could have
been engaged in a process of sharing needs, goals, and talents. Then issues such as differing grade
expectations and differing workload constraints could have been addressed more directly. As it is, these
problems simply emerged during the course of the group’s life, and they did so with negative
consequences. It is unlikely that total integration could be achieved in a temporary workgroup like this.
But with proper “front-end” management, the group could be enabled to operate in the norming and
performing stages for reasonable success. The key lesson in this case is that it is much better to have
everyone share their expectations and limitations in the beginning than to confront them after they start
causing problems.
2. What should Christine understand about individual membership in groups in order to build
group processes that are supportive of her workgroup’s performance?
This answer relates to the prior one. The key point is that people have different needs and expectations
when they join groups. In a course workgroup, for example, some people will want to get an “A” and will
put in a lot of work; others may take any grade that they get and won’t want to do much of anything. It is
probably best to recognize these differences and make them public since it is unlikely that major changes
in a person’s commitments will be made during the short life of temporary workgroup. Rather than have
capable group members spend valuable time complaining about and trying to influence a “loafer” or an
uncooperative member, it may be better to accept their restricted involvement and get on with the
important things. Of course, it is also legitimate for the group to assign final grades differentially based on
the amount and quality of contributions from the various members. In this way, the different needs of
members may be well served and without any feeling of inequity.
INSTRUCTOR’S NOTES
This exercise can provide your students with an opportunity to enter into a very substantive discussion on
employee motivation and job satisfaction. Encourage your students to bring their textbooks with them the
day you administer the exercise. Then ask your students to turn to the chapter on motivation during the
administration of the exercise. Ask your students to discuss the various theories of motivation, and select
the ones that have the best chances of succeeding in this situation. In a debriefing session after the
exercise is completed, ask your students if they were “surprised” at how difficult it is to build a
motivational plan.
Answers will vary in terms of how the “worksheet” is completed. Most completed worksheets,
however, will resemble the following:
Worksheet
Individual Worker Team Member
Talks Discusses
Me oriented Team (or group) oriented
Department focus Company focus
Competitive Collaborative
Logical Holistic
Written message Spoken message
Image View
Secrecy Openness
Short-term sighted Long-term sighted
Immediate results Longer-term results
Critical Supportive
Tenure Sharing
INSTRUCTOR’S NOTES
This is a structured exercise in which several groups are formed to solve a problem regarding
international geography. Each group determines which one of its members is the “most competent” or
knowledgeable with respect to international geography. These “experts” are formed into another group
but still retain their membership in their respective home groups. This procedure enables the experts to be
boundary persons between the expert group and their home groups. The expert group and the other groups
are given the problem to solve, and a relatively structured interaction approach between the experts and
the home teams is followed. After solving the problem, there is a class discussion of the nature and
implications of the boundary person role.
EGGSPERIENTAL EXERCISE
INSTRUCTOR’S NOTES
This is a teamwork exercise, testing and strengthening the group process, and members’ ability to work
together under time constraints, and with limited resources. The goal is to get participants to utilize their
creative abilities, increase their creativity and motivation by feeding off of the energy of other members,
and learn to “think outside the box.” The exercise also demonstrates the importance of group
cohesiveness.
SELF-ASSESSMENT PORTFOLIO
TEAM EFFECTIVENESS
INSTRUCTOR’S NOTES
This is an excellent self-assessment for the members of an ongoing team or group. It is appropriate to use
in an actual work setting or in the classroom if students are assigned to groups to complete exercises or
other projects. Stress to your students that “group work” or “teamwork” is a growing trend in business
organizations and one of the major management challenges of the future will be how to help employees
function effectively in groups (or teams). Recommend to your students that they keep a copy of this
assessment instrument, and use it throughout their careers to assess the effectiveness of the various groups
in which they participate.
DECISION-MAKING BIASES
INSTRUCTOR’S NOTES
There is no better way to teach students about judgmental heuristics than through experiential activities
such as those provided in this assessment. Students can readily understand these biases when they witness
themselves exhibiting them.
Question 1 deals with bias that derives from the availability heuristic. Many students will choose
“b,” believing that airplane travel is riskier. In fact, driving has the poorer safety record. The choice of
flying is often tied to the way airplane crashes are sensationally reported in the media. Events, like
airplane crashes, that are more vivid and easily remembered, make them more “available” in our memory.
They tend to influence decision making through the availability bias.
Question 2 also deals with the availability heuristic. Most people will choose “a – words that begin with
an ‘r’.” It is incorrect. The bias results as people try to solve the problem by remembering words ⎯ those
that start with “r” ⎯ such as “rich,” and those whose third letters are “r”⎯ such as “first.” Because it is
easier to remember or list words that begin with “r” (with our minds sorting much as we do when reading
a dictionary) this becomes the choice. Wrongly, we assume that because these words are more “available”
in our memory they must be the most frequent in the language.
Question 3 deals with the representativeness heuristic. The tendency is to consider how “representative”
the impression of Mark is vis-à-vis people who would typically be associated with careers in each field.
Because there is information offered that Mark is a musician this tends to dominate the impression.
Factually, MBAs tend toward management consulting work as job choices. The likelihood is that Mark,
as an MBA graduate, would do the same. Unless these data are considered and adequate consideration
given to the “MBA” degree choice Mark had made, the apparent representativeness of his musical
interests and an arts job will dominate the choice.
Question 4 also deals with the representativeness heuristic. In this example the issue is misconception of
chance, with the first four events being misconstrued as “representative” of the fifth. The correct logic in
the situation is “b” ⎯ “incorrect.” The records of the first four sales directors have no impact on the
performance record of the fifth. This is true even though our intuition would suggest otherwise. Many
people will think that because there were “four bad ones in a row” that the chances of getting a “fifth bad
one” are very low. This intuitive judgment is wrong, since the performance of the fifth is independent of
the preceding records.
Question 5 deals with the anchoring and adjustment heuristic. Most people’s answers to the question will
be influenced by the chemist’s estimate. This provides an “anchor” from which their individual judgments
will be developed. The tendency is to adjust up or down from information already provided, even though
that information may have little or no credibility. Decision bias tends to link estimates in such situations
to the original “anchor,” with moves from the anchor point often marginal rather than substantial
Reference: See Max H. Bazerman, Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, Second Edition (New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 1990); see also, Eighth Edition (2012) for other examples and an expanded discussion of these
judgmental heuristics.
The river here is a wide, handsome stream, and the walls extend
quite to the banks, and have two water-gates; the character is the
same as nearer its embouchure. I passed one of these water-gates
at sunset, and was much struck by the beauty of the landscape, with
the fishing canoes just returning towards Loggun: the stream sweeps
off to the south-south-west, and then to the south. Loggun was said
to be thirty miles distant by the river. Here my poor friend declared it
impossible to remain, and we moved on towards Loggun the next
morning. We could advance, however, but a few miles. Mr. Toole’s
sufferings were most acute; he twice fainted, and we lifted him on
and off his horse like an infant, so helpless had he become. What
added also to our distress was, that from this time until the evening
of the 16th, the Shouaa Arabs, who occupy the frontier of the
Loggun country, refused to allow us to pass until the sultan had been
consulted, and a number of his questions answered as to the
purpose of our visit. We were now close to the river, and
notwithstanding the heat, the only means we had of defending either
ourselves or our animals from the torture of the millions of insects
that beset us, was by lighting fires at the entrance of our tent, and
constantly supplying them with weeds and wet straw: the thick
suffocating smoke arising from this description of fire afforded us
temporary relief. I rode down to the river, which here flows with great
beauty and majesty past the high walls of this capital of Loggun; it
comes direct from the south-west, with a rapid current. We entered
the town by the western gate, which leads to the principal street: it is
as wide as Pall Mall, and has large dwellings on each side, built with
great uniformity, each having a court-yard in front, surrounded by
walls, and a handsome entrance, with a strong door hasped with
iron: a number of the inhabitants were seated at their doors for the
purpose of seeing us enter, with their slaves ranged behind them. At
first they took but little notice of us: indeed, our appearance could not
have been very imposing: one of our party was laid on a camel, and
another supported on his horse by two persons, who walked on each
side of him, while he raved most incoherently from the violence of
the fever by which he was consuming. At length, however, a person
of apparent consequence advanced towards my horse, bending
nearly double, and joining his hands (the first salutation of the kind
that I had seen), followed by his slaves stooping still lower than
himself. After explaining that he was deputed by the sultan to
welcome kab n’jaffy (the white man), and repeating frequently that
he was kaffama (my friend), he preceded our party; and, as we
moved on, each assembly that we passed rose from the ground,
advanced towards us, and saluted us in the same manner as I have
already described. We were at length conducted to our habitation,
which consisted of four separate huts, well built, within an outer wall,
with a large entrance hall for our servants: in the most retired and
quiet spot I spread the mat and pillow of my patient, who was in a
sad state of exhaustion and irritation.
The next morning I was sent for to appear before the sultan: ten
immense negroes, of high birth, most of them gray-bearded, bare-
headed, and carrying large clubs, preceded me through the streets,
and I was received with considerable ceremony. After passing
through several dark rooms, I was conducted to a large square court,
where some hundred persons were assembled, and all seated on
the ground: in the middle was a vacant space, to which they led me,
and I was desired to sit down also. Two slaves, in striped cotton
tobes, who were fanning the air through a lattice-work of cane,
pointed out the retirement of the sultan. On a signal, this shade was
removed, and something alive was discovered on a carpet, wrapped
up in silk tobes, with the head enveloped in shawls, and nothing but
the eyes visible: the whole court prostrated themselves, and poured
sand on their heads, while eight frumfrums and as many horns blew
a loud and very harsh-sounding salute.
My present, a red bornouse, a striped cotton caftan, a turban, two
knives, two pairs of scissors, and a pair of red trowsers, was laid
before him: he again whispered a welcome, for it is considered so
extremely ill-bred in a Loggun gentleman to speak out, that it is with
difficulty you can catch the sound of their voices.
He examined me very minutely, when the shade was again
drawn. I begged for permission to embark on the Shary, and was told
he would consider of it. He particularly inquired if I wished to
purchase b’lowy, or handsome female slaves, which I assured him I
did not; “because,” said he, “if you do, go no farther: I have some
hundreds, and will sell them to you as cheap as any one.”
Loggun, the capital of which country (Kernuk) is on the banks of
the Shary, and in 11° 7′ north latitude, is a very populous country.
Kernuk has fifteen thousand inhabitants at least. They speak a
language nearly Begharmi. The Shouaas are all round them, and to
them they are indebted for the plentiful supply of bullocks, milk, and
fat, with which the market abounds: these necessaries are paid for
by tobes, and blue cotton in stripes, which the Loggun people make
and dye of a very beautiful colour. They have, also, a metal currency
in Loggun, the first I had seen in Negroland: it consists of thin plates
of iron, something in the shape of the tip with which they shoe race-