Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance Richard B M Schasfoort Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance Richard B M Schasfoort Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/surface-plasmon-resonance-
sensors-a-materials-guide-to-design-characterization-
optimization-and-usage-leiva-casemiro-oliveira/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-surface-and-colloid-
chemistry-fourth-edition-birdi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-history-of-poland-m-b-b-
biskupski-second-edition-mieczyslaw-b-biskupski/
https://textbookfull.com/product/preceptor-s-handbook-for-
pharmacists-3rd-edition-lourdes-m-cuellar-and-diane-b-ginsburg/
Free Surface Flows and Transport Processes 36th
International School of Hydraulics 1st Edition Monika
B. Kalinowska
https://textbookfull.com/product/free-surface-flows-and-
transport-processes-36th-international-school-of-hydraulics-1st-
edition-monika-b-kalinowska/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-astrobiology-vera-m/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-real-history-of-secret-
societies-1st-edition-richard-b-spence/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-handbook-of-
salutogenesis-1st-edition-maurice-b-mittelmark/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-micro-and-nano-
manufacturing-and-surface-engineering-proceedings-of-
aimtdr-2018-m-s-shunmugam/
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP001
2nd Edition
Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP001 View Online
View Online
Edited by
Richard B. M. Schasfoort
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Email: r.b.m.schasfoort@utwente.nl
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP001 View Online
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of research for non-commercial purposes or for
private study, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents
Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003, this publication may not
be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior
permission in writing of The Royal Society of Chemistry or the copyright owner, or in the
case of reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright
Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by
the appropriate Reproduction Rights Organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning
reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to The Royal Society of
Chemistry at the address printed on this page.
Whilst this material has been produced with all due care, The Royal Society of Chemistry
cannot be held responsible or liable for its accuracy and completeness, nor for any
consequences arising from any errors or the use of the information contained in this
publication. The publication of advertisements does not constitute any endorsement by
The Royal Society of Chemistry or Authors of any products advertised. The views and
opinions advanced by contributors do not necessarily reflect those of The Royal Society of
Chemistry which shall not be liable for any resulting loss or damage arising as a result
of reliance upon this material.
Printed in the United Kingdom by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY, UK
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP005
v
View Online
preparations of samples are not active to begin with. Don’t shoot the
messenger. Dr Pessimist asserts that his proteins are of high quality because
they are ‘‘a single band on an SDS page gel’’. He fails to realize that this is not
evidence of an active preparation or a conformationally homogeneous
sample. I think biosensor experiments are akin to protein crystallography.
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP005
report kinetic constants include an overlay of the binding response with the
fitted model. And finally, even from a brief glance through the literature, it is
apparent that the majority of investigators do not understand that the shape
of the response profile should be an exponential in both the association and
dissociation phases (maybe many users do not even understand what an
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP005
more than 1000 systems I have examined. The reason I am reluctant to use
this model is that typically a data set that fits a conformational change
model can be equally well described by other models such as those for ligand
and/or analyte heterogeneity. Even more alarmingly, the rates for the sup-
posed conformational changes measured on the biosensor are extremely
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP005
slow, often with half-lives of 20–60 minutes if you take the time to calculate
them. These rates do not make biological sense to me. A quick search of the
classical conformational change literature shows that re-organizational
events which occur during binding happen on a nanosecond to millisecond
time-scale. The hot ‘‘new’’ trend with the SPiRts is to fit their biosensor data
with a conformational change model and then present crystal structure data
of unbound and bound complexes and say ‘‘See, this change in conform-
ation proves it’’. But an objective viewer would disagree. The fact that you see
a change in conformation in the structure actually may not relate to the
complex binding response you are measuring on the biosensor. Don’t be
fooled by these sleight-of-hand arguments. (What would help confirm the
conformational change suggested by SPR would actually be to use a time-
resolved structural method such as circular dichroism or fluorescence res-
onance energy transfer and demonstrate that the time-dependent changes
are the same.) The cause of the complex binding response on the biosensor
is actually more likely due to surface aggregation, nonspecific binding,
molecular crowding, avidity effects or sample heterogeneity.
This brings me to my favorite SPR users, who I refer to as SPiRits. SPiRits
are new users or those having some familiarity of biosensor technology who
have a deep desire to learn more about its features, applications and po-
tential. They are the ones who are participating in our yearly benchmark
studies, which are geared toward calibrating users’ experimental technique.
They are willing to put in the effort to troubleshoot their systems and want to
improve the quality of the data and not just settle for whatever the machine
spits out. SPiRits will be the users who develop novel applications and im-
plement new technologies in the future.
We need SPiRits because the number and types of SPR instruments are
exploding. An Internet search reveals more than 20 companies developing
SPR-based biosensor systems. Lately, biosensor advances have occurred on
two fronts. First, many of the recently released instruments (and others
currently under development) are dedicated to specific applications ranging
from small-molecule drug discovery to the characterization of complex
mixtures in the clinical and food sciences. Corning’s Epic plate-based system
is an example of targeting the technology for screening applications. Second,
we have seen a push to increase the throughput of biosensor analyses. In
the past few years, the launches of BioRad’s ProteOn XPR36 and Biacore’s
A100 have dramatically impacted the biosensor field since they allow for
parallel processing of multiple analytes over multiple targets simul-
taneously. Array-based platforms represent the next wave in biosensor
development. Biacore’s Flexchip and instruments being developed by GWC
Technologies, Lumera, IBIS Technologies, Genoptics and Maven open up the
View Online
David G. Myszka
University of Utah
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP010
It is a great honor for me to be writing the Foreword to the 2nd edition of the
Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance, not only because of the high caliber
of the contributing authors, forming an ‘‘all-star cast’’ in the label-free
biosensor field, but also because the Foreword to the 1st edition was written
by my post-doctoral mentor, Dr David Myszka, to whom I am grateful for
giving me the incredible opportunity to work in his laboratory, which
launched my career in SPR. In reading his Foreword, I especially relate to his
comments regarding the love of SPR due to the truly awesome insight it
offers into how molecules interact with one another and how this can be
observed in real time and without the need for labeling. Indeed, ‘‘seeing is
believing’’! Biosensors are devices that use biological molecules such as
proteins to detect the presence of other molecules due to their binding
interactions. This rather general definition sets ground zero for the myriad
of applications that are now made possible on commercial biosensors,
which employ SPR or other label-free detection methods, such as biolayer
interferometry (BLI), quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), electrical im-
pedance, or microcalorimetry.
I first learned about SPR in 1997 during my PhD studies when I was
seeking a quantitative method for assessing the DNA-binding properties of a
panel of mutant NFkB constructs, with the project’s goal being gene therapy.
I had turned to SPR because I was frustrated at the tedium and lack of
quantitation associated with other methods, such as gel shift assays. I was
instantly hooked by SPR’s real-time label-free method and to this day I am
passionate about SPR technologies and excited by the versatility of experi-
ments that can be performed quickly, with relative ease, and with minimal
sample consumption to answer basic to more exploratory questions about
molecular-level interaction analysis. In the early 1990s, the Biacore 2000 was
x
View Online
a state-of-the-art SPR platform and variations on this design are still em-
ployed today, with next-generation instruments such as the Biacore T200
employing this classic four-channel module. Over the past 20 years, both
hardware and software capabilities have evolved in their sophistication,
enabling prolific growth of biosensor platforms in the commercial market
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP010
that was once monopolized by Biacore. The demand for more automated
and higher throughput analysis has led to a variety of multiplexed con-
figurations as offered by platforms such as ProteOn XPR36 and Octet/
ForteBio, and a host of array-based SPR imagers such as IBIS, Horiba,
Reichert, and others. Traditionally, label-free biosensors have been used
for binding kinetics, but the scope of their utility has expanded beyond
kinetics to any assay that relies on binding specificity. When the first Biacore
instrument emerged, it was considered somewhat of a niche biophysical
tool, but now SPR biosensors are a mainstay in laboratories worldwide
and used routinely in the pharmaceutical industry, drug and biomarker
discovery, the food industry, and academic research.
I have been working with SPR and other label-free technologies in the drug
discovery industry for over 12 years, and have extensive hands-on experience
with them, and perhaps an addiction to data generation. An exciting ap-
plication that has streamlined the discovery of therapeutic antibodies is
epitope binning. An epitope is the region on an antigen that is recognized by
an antibody. Some epitopes are involved in an antigen’s interactions with its
natural binding partners, and most therapeutic antibodies work by inter-
fering with or blocking them. However, since the epitope targeted by an
antibody is an innate property of an antibody that cannot be shifted ra-
tionally by engineering, and current in silico methods cannot design an
antibody with a desired epitope specificity, proper epitope selection is em-
piric and key to the success of a therapeutic program. In an epitope binning
assay, a biosensor is used to detect whether two antibodies can bind their
specific antigen at the same time, inferring their non-overlapping epitopes,
or whether one antibody blocks another, inferring their overlapping epi-
topes. When epitope binning assay are performed in high throughout, they
scale to large combinatorial experiments, enabling antibodies to be sorted
into epitope families or ‘‘bins.’’ Bin members often share similar functional
characteristics, and only a few bins will target therapeutically interesting
epitopes, which can be confirmed in lower throughput and more nuanced
biological assays. Epitope binning results essentially reveal the ‘‘epitope
landscape’’ of an antibody panel, which quickly informs decisions on how to
whittle it down to a few leads for further characterization. With antibody
production being highly commoditized and library selection methods
yielding prolific numbers of genetically diverse and viable clones, there is an
ever-growing need for analytical tools to meet this capacity. Array-based SPR
biosensor platforms enable researchers to perform higher throughput and
higher resolution experiments that can differentiate antibodies from one
another both functionally and mechanistically, which is necessary in gen-
erating superior drugs.
View Online
The chapters contained herein survey a breadth of topics from the fun-
damentals of understanding the meaning of the SPR curves themselves to a
deep-dive exploration into various applications. I hope you will enjoy this
book and feel inspired to learn more about the wonderful world of SPR and
its endless possibilities, limited only by our imagination.
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP010
Editors, authors often claim that completion of their book was a giant,
lonesome and tedious task. Often they add, their mission was ‘‘once in a
lifetime’’. As they say in Germany with a sense of humor, ‘‘Einstein macht
noch kein Hausy’’ meaning that the cooperation of people is in the heart of
big achievements. So it has been with our book: all the authors had to find
time in their busy life among other important engagements for timely
writing activities, for which we cannot say often enough how grateful we are.
This Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance is the product of an intensive
interaction process and is intended for a wide audience: scientists and
students intending to use the technology, the wider public interested in
SPR as a phenomenon and its application, but also providers of (parts of)
the technology. Although the book as a whole covers many aspects of the
technology at present spanning a bridge between theory, instrumentation
and applications, the chapters are written so as to be comprehensible
individually as well. It is hoped that the readers of this book will share our
enthusiasm for biomolecular interaction analysis based on SPR technology.
We also hope that we have succeeded in revealing the potential of SPR by
showing highly exciting and unique opportunities for unraveling the func-
tional relationships of complex biological processes.
Special thanks are also due to the members of the Biochip Group of the
MESA þ Institute for Nanotechnology of the University of Twente who
have contributed to the book: Stefan Schlautmann and Hans de Boer for
technical support and some of the drawings. In addition, we thank Geert
Besselink Bianca Beusink, Angelique Lokate, Dietrich Kohlheyer, Ganesh
Krishna-moorthy, Dawid Zalewski, Remco Verdoold, Mayke van der Ploeg
and Bjorn Harink for their input. This devoted team provided the warm and
y
Literally: even Einstein could not build a house and the German meaning of ein stein is
one stone.
xiii
View Online
inspiring atmosphere of the Biochip Group during the two-year period from
the birth of the idea to completion of the manuscript.
The editors would also like to thank Annie Jacob of the Royal Society of
Chemistry for her clear guidance and enduring patience throughout the
editorial process. Wout van Bennekom is acknowledged for final reading of
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP013
several chapters.
After finishing the first edition of the Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance
in 2008, I thought that the book was a ‘‘once in a lifetime’’ effort. With
objective comments, the book was promoted as follows: ‘‘This excellent
handbook provides comprehensive information with easy to use, stand-
alone chapters and will be of great use to anyone working with or affiliated to
the technology.’’ However, after the initial success and many citations in
scientific publications, I felt more and more uncomfortable about the timely
content of many of the chapters. Additionally, I received signals from sci-
entists that after almost 10 years this now outdated book should be renewed,
restyled, and re-edited. I decided to go for it after my keynote lecture entitled
‘‘Overview of 25 years commercial biomolecular interaction analysis’’ at the
label-free technologies conference in Boston presented coincidentally exactly
at p-time (March 14, 2015, at 9 p.m.: 3.14.15.9). At that conference, I col-
lected information from the active label-free technology companies and
consulted some leading scientists to write a chapter for the second edition.
During my life I have done many things twice: always the second time was
better. For example, in 1995, I founded the company IBIS Technologies, but
by 1999 it was almost bankrupt. Since 2012, it gained a second life and it is
growing in SPR imaging applications. And now I am Editor of the second
edition of the Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance and it should be better
than the first!
This second edition of the Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance is new
to a great extent (B90%) compared with the first edition and there is def-
initely a better balance between improved optics, fluidics, surface chem-
istries and applications. It is intended for a wide audience to provide tutorial
information for scientists, laboratory technicians, and students using the
technology but also for the wider public interested in SPR as a phenomenon
and its applications. Although the book as a whole covers many relevant
xv
View Online
biological processes.
Richard B. M. Schasfoort
Enschede, The Netherlands
Published on 24 May 2017 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781788010283-FP017
Contents
xix
View Online
xx Contents
Richard B. M. Schasfoort
2.1 Introduction 27
2.2 History 29
2.2.1 Early History of SPR Biosensors 29
2.2.2 History of SPR Biosensors After 1990 30
2.3 Surface Plasmon Theory 31
2.3.1 The Evanescent Wave 31
2.3.2 Surface Plasmon Dispersion Equations;
Resonance 33
2.3.3 Excitation of Surface Plasmons 35
2.3.4 Surface Plasmon Properties 37
2.3.5 Choice of Experimental Parameters 39
2.3.6 Optimizing SPR Imaging Performance 42
2.4 SPR Instrument Optics 46
2.4.1 Fixed Angle 47
2.4.2 Fan-shaped Beam 48
2.4.3 Scanning Angle 50
2.4.4 Grating Coupler 51
2.4.5 Fiber-based SPR Sensors 51
2.4.6 Other Optical Systems 54
2.4.7 SPR Imaging Instruments 55
2.5 Concluding Remarks 56
2.6 Questions 57
References 58
3.1 Introduction 60
3.2 The Cornerstones of SPR Technology 62
3.3 General Optical Requirements for SPR Instruments 63
3.4 SPR Liquid Handling Systems 65
3.4.1 Cuvette Systems 66
3.4.2 Flow Systems 68
3.5 SPR Instruments: State of the Art 71
3.5.1 Examples of Fan-shaped Beam SPR
Instruments 71
View Online
Contents xxi
xxii Contents
Contents xxiii
Erk T. Gedig
xxiv Contents
Contents xxv
xxvi Contents
Contents xxvii
xxviii Contents
Contents xxix
Page
Page
Soufflés 377
Louise Franks’ Citron Soufflé 378
A Fondu, or Cheese Souffle 379
Observations on Omlets, 380
Fritters, &c.
A common Omlet 380
An Omlette Soufflé (second 381
course, remove of roast)
Plain Common Fritters 381
Pancakes 382
Fritters of Cake and Pudding 382
Mincemeat Fritters 383
Venetian Fritters (very good) 383
Rhubarb Fritters 383
Apple, Peach, Apricot, or 384
Orange Fritters
Brioche Fritters 384
Potato Fritters (Entremets) 384
Lemon Fritters (Entremets) 384
Cannelons (Entremets) 385
Cannelons of Brioche paste 385
(Entremets)
Croquettes of Rice (Entremets) 385
Finer Croquettes of Rice 386
(Entremets)
Savoury Croquettes of Rice 386
(Entrée)
Rissoles (Entrée) 387
Very savoury Rissoles (Entrée) 387
Small fried Bread Patties, or 387
Croustades of various kinds
Dresden Patties, or Croustades 387
(very delicate)
To prepare Beef Marrow for 388
frying Croustades, Savoury
Toasts, &c.
Small Croustades, or Bread 388
Patties, dressed in Marrow
(Author’s receipt)
Small Croustades, à la Bonne 389
Maman (the Grandmamma’s
Patties)
Curried Toasts with Anchovies 389
To fillet Anchovies 389
Savoury Toasts 390
To choose Macaroni, and other 390
Italian Pastes
To boil Macaroni 391
Ribbon Macaroni 391
Dressed Macaroni 392
Macaroni à la Reine 393
Semoulina and Polenta à 393
l’Italienne (Good) (To serve
instead of Macaroni)
CHAPTER XX.
BOILED PUDDINGS.
Page
BAKED PUDDINGS.
Page
Page
Page