Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Definition
A R is a with
ring t set two 2
i
together
binary operations called addition and called
s t mult
the plication
following satisfiedaxioms are
1 R t
is an abelian group
2 Multiplication is associative that is for all
a b C E R Ca b a b c
3 For all a b CER a btc a b a c and
a b c a c bc left and right distributive
laws hold
Example
1 II is closed under the usual addition andmultiplication
1 I is an abeliangroup
2 is associative
3 left andright distributivelaws holds
II is a ring
2 Q R t and it are rings
Remarks
1 If the operations and are clear from context we
R by R
denote the ring t
Definition
Let R be a
ring
1 If multiplication in R is commutative then R is called a
commutative ring
2 An element r s t re R Ipr r rlr is called a
multiplicative identity or a unity
3 If R has a multiplicative identity then R is called a
ring with unity
4 Suppose R is a ring w
unity 1 0 An element her is a
unit if u has a multiplicative inverse that is u e R s t
Uu 1 n n
Remarks
1 some rings are not commutative and some have no unity
2 If R has unity then this unity is unique
3 If R has unityT then R is a unit in R
4 If R has unity not all elements in thering are units
Examples
1 I t
is a commutative ring w
unity 1
The units of II 1 1
2 Q t i
R t and E t s
are commutative
1 11 11 I
at bh
19
f fdg it an
faetbg
ce
Then M IR
is a noncommutative ring w unity
is associative and commutative exercise
is associative but not commutative exercise
left and right distributive laws hold exercise
zeroelt 0 0 add inverse b unity
O O
slide 9121
Theorem 2.13
Let R be a 0 Let
ring w additive identity
a b C E R
1 A 0 0 a 0
2 are 9959 cab reefed
3 1 a b ab
4 a b c ab ac and ca b c ac be
proof
i a o t a o alo to a 0 By left cancellation
a 0 0 The proof for 0 a 0 follows analogously
12 ab al b a b b a 0 0 since the additive in
verse of ab is unique ab al b The proof that C a b
ab proceeds analogously
3 C a C b Lac b 1 ab AD
slide 10 21
Remarks
1 If R is a nonzero ring w unity then I 0 why
2 If R is a
ring w unity and at R then l 1 a a
in particular C1 1
3 Let R be aring and a CER If a 0 and ab
b
al the b and c are NOT necessarily equal
e g in 4 2 1 2 2.3 but I 3
4 In a
ring ab 0 does not necessarily mean that
either a o or b 0
e g in a 23 0
slide 11 21
Theorem 2.14
Let R be a ring w
unity The units of R form a
group under multiplication
Remark
The group of units of a
ring with unity R is
denoted U R
Proof
closure under multiplication Let a be UCR
WTS ab UCR
since a be UCR a b e R s t aa bb
Note that b a E R and
1
b_ a 1 ab b Caa b
b l b
b b 1
Thus ab b a and so abt UCR
Associativity of multiplication Follows from R2
Identity element under multiplication unity UCR hastheproperty that
AEU R ER a 1 1a a
Inverse under multiplication
Let a UCR Then a eR such that a a a a 1 From this we see
that a UCR
i
UCR is a group
slide 13121
Examples
1 4121 1 1 2
2 U Q1 UCR UCC C
3 U In U n set of all elements
of In that arerelatively prime to n
4 U MAR GL 2 IR
slide 14121
Definition
Let R be a
ring w
unity 170 If every non zero
element of R is a unit then R is called a
division ring
R div ring
a b CER a 0 R field
ab ca
ab c ab ac ab ac
a lab a c a lab a Cac
b a c b I a.tn
bg
slide 15121
Remarks
Let P be a ring with unity I 0
1 If R is a field we write for ab b a In
particular we write b
2 A division ring can be thought of as an algebraic
structure that is closed under addition subtraction multiplication
and division by non zero elements
3 R is a division ring if and only if R R 0 is a
group
4 R is a field if and only if R R 0 is an abeliangroup
slide
16121
Examples
1 II is not a division ring and hence not a field
2 Q R C are fields
3 I 4 is not a division ring why
4 Ig is a field
In Ig
3 54 3 4 2
1
213 2 5 2 53 2 52 4
slide 17 21
subrings
definition
A subsets of a ring R w c is also a ring itself
under the same operations as in R is called a
subring of R
Theorem 2.15
Let R
be a ring and s a non empty subset of
R Then S is a
subring of R it a bes a bes
and ab ES
Proof
since s is a ring then S t is an abelian group
hence a bes Also abes since is a
binary operation on S
Slide 17 21
suppose a bes and abes taibes
R1 a bes albes s t is a subgroup of R t
Thus S t is an abelian group
follows since operations in S and R are thesame
Rpf MATT
slide 18121
Remarks
Let R be and S of R
a
ring a
subring
1 If R is commutative then S is also
comm tative
2 S may be w o unity even if R has unity
Slide 19 21
SUBFIELDS
Definition
A subset S of a field F wic is also a field itself
under the same operations as in F is called a subfield
of F
s
Theorem 2.16 unity is in
Let F be a field and s a nonempty subset of F
Then s is a sub field of F if and only if the fit
hold
1 S 0
2 for all a b Es a be 5 and abes
3 for all OF aes a es
Proof Exercise
slide 20 21
Examples
1 If R is a ring then 0 trivial subring and
R improper subring are subrings of R
2 Q is field of R
a sub
3 For any ne II n II is a subring of II why
Note that if n 1 1 then nII has no unity
D2 IR is
1 8 s
ED.IR asubring of
MCR
1 1 1
End of Dec 5
Dec 7 2023 discussion
Math 110.1 fully copied
NOTET study last example in prev lecture
slides file was edited for some correction
and re uploaded this morning
Zero Divisors Integral Domains and
of a charact
ring ristic
Rings
Rings w unity
Interdomain
Q R divisionrings
2
4 Mar
Example
1 zero divisors of 12 2 3 4,6 8 9,10
2 I has No zero divisors
baka lumabas so
THEOREM 2.17 true or false
The zero divisors of n are its non zero elements
that are NOT relatively prime to n
PROOF
Let Of a In
suppose a'is a zero divisor of In
0 b E ns.t.ab 0
nlab
If a prime to n then n b
is rel b 0
i a is NOT rel prime to n
F suppose d god ain 1
Write a dk and n dkz where k R2 ETI
and kz In and kz 0
Thus aka Alk k2 d k2 k n k 0
i a is a zero divisor of In
Q E D
Definition
A commutative ring with unity 1 0 is s.t.be
an integral domain if it has NO zero divisors
Remark
in an integral domain D if ab D then either 9 0
or b 0
Examples
1 II is an integral domain
2 Q R C are integral domains
3 In is an integral domain
n is prime highly likely sa T or F
e g in 7
2 5X 6 0
21 3 0
2 0 or 3 0
2 5 or 3 4
4 II II
a b c d bd
ac
a b c d Cate btd
unity 1,1
coin
t.IE
I is not an integral domain
5 Mz IR is not an integral domain since M1 IR is not comm
6 2 has no unity not an integral domain
THEOREM 2.18
Let R be a comm ring w unity I 0
Then the cancellation law for multiplication holds in R
R is an integral domain
PROOF
a b CER a 0 then a b a c b c
Let a b e IR w a 0
If ab 0 a
OF b 0
i a is
NOTa zero div
i
R is an int dom
Q E D
Remark
i If a'is a unit then a is not a zero div
ab 0 lab 0
a b 0
1 b 0
b 0
2 In an int dom R if a 0 ax D has
at most one soln in R
But if a'is a unit then ax b has exactly one soln in R
Theorem 2 19
Every field is an integral domain
PROOF
Let F be a field F is a comm ring with 1 O s t every
non zero elt is a unit
Theorem 2.20
Every ItintegraldomainD is a field
Proof
Let D be a finite int dom comm ring w 0
WTS D is ring a div
Let of a e D Define a function f Pax
suppose YED sit f x fly
ax ay E y
f is 1 1 f is onto
since f is onto be D s t f b
a b a is a unit in D
D is a field Q E D
Example p prime
p is an int dom Since Ip is finite then p is a field
Recall
Let R be a
ring and a ER
If he N n a tna a a
atant.i.to n
0 0 A 0 Ifn
Example
1 In My IR
31 I 1 1 l
2 In 6
3ta3 0
IE
Remark
If R is a a b ER and mine
ring
then the f f hold
1 mtn a matna important
2 math matmb exercise properties
3 m n a min a for proving
4 m ab ma b a mb and Mani
5 match b mn cab pulation
for 4 and 5 hindi ba dapat
R must be a commutative ring
Definition
The characteristic of a ring R is the least positive integer
n such that n a o for all at IR
If no such integer exists then R is s.t.be of
characteristic 0
Example
1 40,112,3 4,5
6 1 0 Indeed 6 9 0 at 6 and 6 is the smallest
Charl 6 6 such pos.int
2 char E 0 char Q char IR char C
Theorem 2.21
Let R be a
ring w unity 1
1 If 1 has an infinite order then char R 0
2 If 1 has order n then char R n
proof exercise
s
r s
Example
1 Let R be a ring
0 and R are ideals of R
trivial ideals imprippera
ideal I sit I R is a properideal of R
2 Q R
I Q and R E IR
however V2 I Q1 thus Q is not an ideal
3 n NE II
i
n is an ideal of n is a subring of
If en is a subring of nk for some KEII
Let retI Then rix rink n rk Ent Also Xr rxen
Theorem 2.23
R be a
let
ring and 0 I IR Then I is ideal if and
only if the f f hold
used for testing
1 a b E I a be I
ideal of a ring
2 ER AEI ra EI and are
Example
Leinne The principal ideal of gen by n
an nk KEE ME
consider s a subring of R
S t is an abelian subgroup of the abelian
group R
Note SIR
Is rts reR is an abelian group under
addition of left cosets
r S rats r trz S
Define
r 5 112 5 r r 5
multiplication of additive left cosets of S
Lemm a 2.24
Let R be a ring and I an ideal of R Then multiplication
of left cosets of I is a well defined operation on the set
R a I AER
I
Proof
suppose at I I and b I dtI
WTS a I DTI CTI ATI
i e ab I ed I
i e abted I
at I at CEI ate for some EI c xta
b I d I b d EI Dtd
y y EI a ytb
Thus d tallytb bty a x b y catx b t
atx
lately
abtxbtaytx
abted so
EE.tk tEftI
I ERIN
abt I ca
The rem 2.25
Let I be an ideal of aring R Then att a ER
is a ring under addition and multiplication of left cosets
R2 Let a I b I I R
I
a I b INCTI ATI DC I
9 DC I ab c I
Cab I CTI ATI DTI CTI
R
Rz Let a I btI I I
a I DTI CTI ATI DTC I
albte I abt a c I lab I cacti
att b I ATI CTI
Right distributive law is proven analogously
INSET
Exercise f
Remark
R
1 If R is commutative then I is commutative
2 If R has unity 1 then R I has unity 1 R
Examples
1 I 3 3 1 3 2 3
commutative has unity 1 3
32 1 3 2 3 32 1 3 2 3
32 3 1 311 2 31 32 3 3 3
1 31 1 311 2 3 1 32 1 31 311 1731 2 311
2 311 2 311 31 1 311 2 311 311 2 311 1 31
31 50 is a
I 1 311 3 field
12 311 2 311
Exercise
2 consider 8 2 8 is an ideal of 211
2
a Determine the elements of 8
2
b construct the t and_tables for 8
2
c Is 8 an integral domain
December 14 2023
Ring Homomorphisms
Definition
A homomorphism from a ring R to a ring R is a
ring
mapping from R to R that preserves both ring
operations that is a be R
atb a b and
ab a 0 b
Remarks
Let R R be a ring homomorphism
1 If 0 is 11 is a ring monomorphism
2 onto is a ring epimorphism
then is called a riffomorphism
Iiiective and R R then is called a
ring automorphism
Definition
Two rings R and R are s.t.be isomorphic written RER
if there exists an isomorphism from R to R
0cal a
Proof Exercise
KERNEL of a HOMOMORPHISM
Definition
Let R R berings with O the zero elt.in R _Let 0 R R be a ring homomorphism
The kernel of is the set
ker 0 a ER a O 0
inverseimages of 0
Remarks
1 is 1 1 if and only if ker 0
2 is a ring isomorphism if and only if is onto and ker 0
3 If AER and a a then
ca reR 0in a atker
The kernel is an deal
Theorem 2 27
Let R R be a ring homomorphism Then ker is
an ideal of R
Proof
Let 0 be the zero elementof R sinceis a subring of
0
R then 0 ker is a subring of R by Thm 2.26
µ R ker R
minism
given by Mcatkero 0cal is a ring
In particular R ker R as rings
Proof It follows from the First Isomorphism Theorem for
Groups that µ is a group isomorphism µ preserves multifi
WTS
Let atkero biker ER kerf Then µ at kero Cbt Ker0
By the FITR
I n I kero II In
Thus
I n In as rings
01 7 1 10
her 0
BY the FITR
I 0 I ker II 1 10 EI
Noting that I 0 II we get
I 1 10 EI
Theorem 2.29
Let I be an ideal of a ring R Then 8 R R I given
Proof
It follows from theorem 2.12 that 8 is a group homomorphism
w Ker 8 I WTS 8 preserves multiplication
Let a b e R Then lab abt I att b I a 8lb
8 is a ring homomorphism QED
December19 2023
Theorem 2.30
Let R be a ring with unity 1 and let I be an ideal of R If I
contains a unit of R then I R
Proof
suppose neI is a unit of R Then U ER s t I U u I since I is
an ideal of R Thus 1 E I
Corollary 2.31
A field has no proper initiitial ideals That is theonly ideals
of a field F are 40 or F itself
Proof
Let F be a field and I an ideal of F Note that either I is trivial
that is 40 or I is non trivial
suppose 0 let 0 a EIEF Thus a'is a unit of F
Hence I F QED
Definition
A proper ideal M of a ring R is said to be maximal it whenever
I is an ideal of R such that METER either Mor J R
Maximal deals of 12
Example consider the ring 1,2 0,1 2,3 4,5 6 7 8 9,10
The ideals of 12
In Is 4 a maximal ideal
427 0 2 4 6 8,10 of 1,2
37 0 3 6,9 Is 447 a maximal ideal
47 0,4 8 of 27
67 0 6 what are the maximal
0 ideals of 12
factor rings from maximal ideals are fields
Theorem 2.32 Let R be a commutative ring with unity
let be an ideal of R Then
Proof
I suppose that RII is a field e an ideal of R s t
I E J E R NTS Either J I or I
Let
suppose J I Then be JII I b I E R I bt is a
unit in R I Fat ER I sit bt 1 at It bat 1 CJ
Thus 1 ba bat 1 E J R I is a maximal ideal of R
Proof
J is non empty O O a t O E J s
If X Y E J show that ye J exercise
If SE R and EJ show that sxeJ and S E J
E J rat b for some re R be 1
so SX stratb sr at sb EJ Note that R is
commutative so s SX E QED
Examples
1 Consider 61 Note that 2 3 GI but neither 2 nor 3 are in 611
Thus GII is not aprime ideal of GII
2 consider the trivial ideal 0 in 112 1540 a primeidealof 12
3 40 is a prime ideal of an integraldomain D
Let a b E D such that ab e 90 an 0 a 0 or b 0
a e 0 or be 0
Proof
I I suppose R I is an integraldomain Let a b R a t ab e l
Then abt cat 1 btl since all is an integral
domain either at 1 or Pt w e means that either
a or be 1
I suppose is a prime ideal of R since thenR is a commutative
ring w unity 1 then so R 1 Note also R since is prime and
so I 1 Thus it 1
NTS R I has no zero divisors
Let at bt ER I such that att btl Then abt a bet
since I is prime then either act or bet at or bt
i
R I is an integraldomain que
is a prime ideal of R
Proof
Let 1 be a maximal ideal of R By Theorem 2.32 R 1 is a field
Hence R l is an integral domain Thus I is a prime ideal of R quel
Remarks
1 The converse of corollary 2.35 does NOT hold That is a primeideal
of a commutative ring R w unitymay not be a maxima ideal of R
eg X0 XE is a prime ideal of XII w e is not a
maximal ideal of IX why
2 Corollary 2.35 does not hold if R has no unity
eg 21 has no unity and 41 is a maximal ideal of 21 but 4 is not
a prime ideal of 21 why
Dec 21 2023
Fields of Quotients of Integral Domains and Prime Fields
Proof
Let mine Then
mn Mn 1 m 1 n 1 m n god
Remark
Note that II is a subring of R
The characteristics of Rings with Unity
char R smallest positive integer n such that
n a 0 a E R
If no such positive integer exists then
char R 0
Theorem 2.37
let R be a ring with unity
1 Char R n 1 R containsa subring isomorphic to IIn
2 Char R 0 R contains a subring isomorphic to II
Proof
consider the ring homomorphism 0 R givenby 1m m 1
By the FITR I ker II
Note that ker 0 me I 0cm 0 me m 1 0
suppose char R n 1 So 11 n That is n 1 0
and m 1 0 nlm men
Example
consider the ring R MalR w unity o
Note that the order o is infinite Why
Hence char Mz IR 0
Thus Mz R has a subring isomorphic to II by
Theorem 2.37
This subring is II where 0 McCR is
given by 01m
MI 1 I
Thus II 01m ME 1 8 MEI
a b c d ad be bd t
adpt
a b c d cac bd G f of
1 2 13 4 5,6
a b c d ad be f ad be
Theorem 2.38
Let P be an integraldomain Thenthereexists a field that contains
a subring w c is isomorphic to D
proof
consider S a b I a be D D 0 C DX D
Define the relationon 5 by a b cc d ad be
claim is an E R on S exercise
Denote the equivalence class of a b by a b
Note that a b c d ad be
let F a b a b 5
Define the f f operations on F
addition a b c d adt be Dd
multiplication a b c d ac bd
MAI
Remarks
1 The field Fin Theorem 2.38 is called the field of quotients of D
a We say that the integraldomain D is embedded in its field of quotients
F and we write D F
Example
Q is the field of quotients of II
Theorem 2.39
let D be an integral domain and F its field of quotients suppose
K is a field that contains D Then K contains a subfield L such that
DE LE K and L is isomorphic to F
Proof
Let a b F Then a b ED and b 0 Thus a b Ek and
b is a unit in K
Define F K given by a b ab Then is
a well defined monomorphism Exercise
set F By FITR
L F F kerd F 0 F
Thus L is a subfield of K which is isomorphic to F
For every aeD a a 1 a 1 a 1 Thus DELEK
god
prime subfield of a
field
Recall
The characteristic of an integral domain is either 0 or prime p
Theorem 2 40
Let F be a field
1 F is of prime characteristic p F contains a subfield
isomorphic to Ip
2 F is of characteristic 0 F contains a subfield isomorphic
to Q
Proof
1 Since char F p F contains a subring S isomorphic to Ip
Since p is prime Ip is a field Thus S is a subfield of F
isomorphic to Ip
2 If char F is 0 then F contains a subring S isomorphic to II so
S is an integral domain contained in the field F
By Theorem 2.39 F contains a subfield L w c is isomorphic to the
field of quotients Fs of S
since SEII Fs Q Thus L Q quel
Definition The subfield of a field F that is isomorphic to either
p or Q is called a primesubfield of F
Examples
1 Identify the primesubfield of the field T2 atbkla.be Q
2 Suppose F is a field with 81elements The prime subfield of F is
isomorphic to whichfield
solution
1 Theunityin Q T2 is 1 since order of 1 is infinite char E D
Thus the primesubfield of T2 is Q
2 Note order of F is 81
order of 1 charF p for some prime p
p divides 81 34 p 3
Thus the primesubfield of F is isomorphic to 13