You are on page 1of 11

Solution Manual for South-Western Federal Taxation 2016 Comprehensive, 39th Edition

Solution Manual for South-Western


Federal Taxation 2016 Comprehensive,
39th Edition
Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://testbankmall.com/dow
nload/solution-manual-for-south-western-federal-taxation-2016-comprehensive-39th-e
dition/

Visit TestBankMall.com to get complete for all chapters


Alice Hanks, CPA
Tax Partner

2-1

© 2016 Cengage ©
Learning.
2016 Cengage
All Rights
Learning.
Reserved.
All Rights
May notReserved.
be scanned,
Maycopied
not beor
scanned,
duplicated,
copied
or posted
or duplicated,
to a publicly
or posted
accessible
to a publicly
website,
accessible
in wholewebsite,
or in part.
in whole or in part.
2-2 2016 Comprehensive Volume/Solutions
Working with the Manual
Tax Law 2-3

5. (LO 1, 2) Income tax

Reg. § 1. 163–10 (a) (2)

Type of Regulation
Related Code Section
Regulation Number
Regulation Paragraph
Regulation Subparagraph

6. (LO 1) Notice 90–20 is the 20th Notice issued during 1990, and it appears on page 328 of Volume 1
of the Cumulative Bulletin in 1990.

7. (LO 1, 4) The items would probably be ranked as follows (from lowest to highest):

(1) Letter ruling (valid only to the taxpayer to whom issued).

(2) Proposed Regulation (most courts ignore these).

(3) Revenue Ruling.

(4) Interpretive Regulation.

(5) Legislative Regulation.

(6) Internal Revenue Code.

8. (LO 1)
a. This is a Temporary Regulation; 1 refers to the type of Regulation (i.e., income tax), 956 is
the related Code section number, 2 is the Regulation section number, and T refers to
temporary.

b. Revenue Ruling number 15, appearing on page 975 of the 23rd weekly issue of the Internal
Revenue Bulletin for 2012.

c. Letter Ruling 51, issued in the 4th week of 2002.

9. (LO 1, 5) TAX FILE MEMORANDUM

DATE: September 23, 2015

FROM: George Ames

SUBJECT: Telephone conversation with Sally Andrews on applicability of 2007 letter ruling
I told Sally Andrews that only the taxpayer to whom the 2007 letter ruling was issued may rely on the
pronouncement. I stressed that a letter ruling has no precedential value under § 6110(k)(3).
I pointed out that a letter ruling indicates the position of the IRS on the specific fact pattern present as
of the date of the letter ruling. As such, a letter ruling is not primary authority. However, under Notice
90–20, 1990–1 C.B. 328, a letter ruling is substantial authority for purposes of the accuracy-related
penalty in § 6662.

© 2016 Cengage ©
Learning.
2016 Cengage
All Rights
Learning.
Reserved.
All Rights
May notReserved.
be scanned,
Maycopied
not beor
scanned,
duplicated,
copied
or posted
or duplicated,
to a publicly
or posted
accessible
to a publicly
website,
accessible
in wholewebsite,
or in part.
in whole or in part.
2-2 2016 Comprehensive Volume/Solutions
Working with the Manual
Tax Law 2-4

10. (LO 1) Letter rulings may be found in:

• Private Letter Rulings (RIA).

• BNA Daily Tax Reports.

• Tax Notes (Tax Analysts).

• Although not referenced in the text, letter rulings are also available in the IRS Letter Rulings
Report (CCH).

11. (LO 1) Dwain must consider several factors in deciding whether to take the dispute to the judicial
system:
• How expensive will it be?

• How much time will be consumed?

• Does he have the temperament to engage in the battle?

• What is the probability of winning?


• Once a decision is made to litigate the issue, the appropriate judicial forum must be selected.
• Tax Court judges have more expertise in tax matters.

• The tax deficiency need not be paid to litigate in the Tax Court. However, if Dwain loses, interest
must be paid on any unpaid deficiency.

• If a trial by jury is preferred, the U.S. Tax Court is the appropriate forum.

• The tax deficiency must be paid before litigating in the District Court or the Court of Federal
Claims.

• If an appeal to the Federal Circuit is important, Dwain should select the Court of Federal Claims.

• A survey of the decisions involving the issues in dispute is appropriate. If a particular court has
taken an unfavorable position, that court should be avoided.

12. (LO 1) The main advantage of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims occurs when a taxpayer’s applicable
Circuit Court previously rendered an adverse decision. Such a taxpayer may select the U.S. Court of
Federal Claims because any appeal will be to the Federal Circuit.

One disadvantage of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims is that the tentative deficiency must be paid
before the Court will hear and decide the controversy.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims is a trial court that usually meets in Washington, D.C. It has
jurisdiction for any claim against the United States that is based on the Constitution, any Act of
Congress, or any Regulation of an executive department.

© 2016 Cengage ©
Learning.
2016 Cengage
All Rights
Learning.
Reserved.
All Rights
May notReserved.
be scanned,
Maycopied
not beor
scanned,
duplicated,
copied
or posted
or duplicated,
to a publicly
or posted
accessible
to a publicly
website,
accessible
in wholewebsite,
or in part.
in whole or in part.
2-4 2016 Comprehensive Volume/Solutions
Working with the Manual
Tax Law 2-5

13. (LO 1, 5) Hoffman, Maloney, Raabe, & Young, CPAs


5191 Natorp Boulevard
Mason, OH 45040
July 8, 2015
Mr. Eddy Falls
200 Mesa Drive
Tucson, AZ 85714
Dear Mr. Falls:
You have three alternatives should you decide to pursue your $229,030 deficiency in the court
system. One alternative is the U.S. Tax Court, the most popular forum. Some people believe that the
Tax Court judges have more expertise in tax matters. The main advantage is that the U.S. Tax Court
is the only trial court where the tax need not be paid prior to litigating the controversy. However,
interest will be due on an unpaid deficiency. The interest rate varies from one quarter to the next as
announced by the IRS.
One disadvantage of the U.S. Tax Court is the delay that might result before a case is decided. The
length of delay depends on the Court calendar, which includes a schedule of locations where cases
will be tried. Another disadvantage is being unable to have the case heard before a jury.
The major advantage of another alternative, the U.S. District Court, is the availability of a trial by
jury. One disadvantage of a U.S. District Court is that the tentative tax deficiency must be paid before
the Court will hear and decide the controversy.
The Court of Federal Claims, the third alternative, is a trial court that usually meets in Washington,
D.C. It has jurisdiction for any claim against the United States that is based on the Constitution, any
Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department. The main advantage of the U.S. Court
of Federal Claims occurs when a taxpayer’s applicable Circuit Court previously rendered an adverse
decision. Such a taxpayer may select the Court of Federal Claims because any appeal will be to the
Federal Circuit instead. One disadvantage of the Court of Federal Claims is that the tentative
deficiency must be paid before the Court will hear and decide the controversy.
I hope this information is helpful, and should you need more help, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Agnes Reynolds, CPA
Tax Partner
14. (LO 1) The U.S. Tax Court hears only tax cases and is the most popular forum for tax cases
(generally viewed as an advantage). Some people suggest that the Tax Court has more expertise in tax
matters. A taxpayer does not have to pay the tax deficiency assessed by the IRS before trial, but a
taxpayer may deposit a cash bond to stop the running of interest (also viewed as an advantage). Appeals
from a Tax Court are to the appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals. A disadvantage is that the taxpayer
may not obtain a jury trial in the U.S. Tax Court.

15. (LO 1) See Exhibit 2.4, Exhibit 2.5, and Concept Summary 2.1.
a. There is no appeal by either the taxpayer or the IRS from a decision of the Small Cases
Division of the U.S. Tax Court.

© 2016 Cengage ©
Learning.
2016 Cengage
All Rights
Learning.
Reserved.
All Rights
May notReserved.
be scanned,
Maycopied
not beor
scanned,
duplicated,
copied
or posted
or duplicated,
to a publicly
or posted
accessible
to a publicly
website,
accessible
in wholewebsite,
or in part.
in whole or in part.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of


any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™


electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend


considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe
and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating
the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may
be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to,
incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a
copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except


for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph
1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner
of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF
WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE
TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL,
PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE
NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you


discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must
return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity
that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in
lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may
demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the
problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied


warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted
by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,
costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or
indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur:
(a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b)
alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project
Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of


Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.
It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and
donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the


assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a
secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help,
see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project


Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,


Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to


the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can
be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the
widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating


charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and
keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in
locations where we have not received written confirmation of
compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of
compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where


we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no
prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in
such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make


any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project


Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed


editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,


including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how
to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

You might also like