This document discusses how science presented in media and advertisements may not always be genuine. It argues that what is portrayed as proven science is often just theories, approaches, and hypotheses that have not been thoroughly tested. The key ideas are that we often blindly accept claims as scientific facts, when in reality many scientific claims used to market products are pseudoscience. We must learn to distinguish legitimate science from fake science, as not everything we are exposed to through media and advertising will lead us towards our goals and purposes. There may be underlying strategies at play, with scientific claims really just serving someone's personal interests rather than being based on solid evidence and testing.
This document discusses how science presented in media and advertisements may not always be genuine. It argues that what is portrayed as proven science is often just theories, approaches, and hypotheses that have not been thoroughly tested. The key ideas are that we often blindly accept claims as scientific facts, when in reality many scientific claims used to market products are pseudoscience. We must learn to distinguish legitimate science from fake science, as not everything we are exposed to through media and advertising will lead us towards our goals and purposes. There may be underlying strategies at play, with scientific claims really just serving someone's personal interests rather than being based on solid evidence and testing.
This document discusses how science presented in media and advertisements may not always be genuine. It argues that what is portrayed as proven science is often just theories, approaches, and hypotheses that have not been thoroughly tested. The key ideas are that we often blindly accept claims as scientific facts, when in reality many scientific claims used to market products are pseudoscience. We must learn to distinguish legitimate science from fake science, as not everything we are exposed to through media and advertising will lead us towards our goals and purposes. There may be underlying strategies at play, with scientific claims really just serving someone's personal interests rather than being based on solid evidence and testing.
The reality is that whenever something is shown to us through an advertisement, commercial, media or any visible resources, we tend to accept and believe the product because we acknowledge that it is proven thoroughly and scientifically, little do we know that this so-called “science” is not genuine, rather what’s behind are just mere theories, approaches and hypothesis. As the summary of the book tells us, this is just pseudoscience. Everything that we have seen and been living with is a fraud, it is not real. Some may say that it is statistically proven or approved by an authorized/certified/registered individual, it may or not be true. We have to identify the legit from the fake, because not everything we perceive can lead us to our end, our purpose. The thing is that there is always behind this science that we are talking about. Who knows? Maybe it is just a strategy for someone’s personal advantage over others, maybe authorities are just observing if this science of them are just alright with us? Or maybe this is just something that we really have to adopt with.