K&A Engineering Consulting, P.C.

445 Hamilton Ave, Suite 406

White Plains, New York

HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION
GROUNDING CALCULATION AND REPORT

REV
DATE DOCUMENT NAME PREPARED CHECKED REVIEWED APPROVED
NO.
HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION
0 02/17/23 GROUNDING CALCULATION AND SN PB JK GP
REPORT

17 Feb 2023 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY K&A ENGINEERING

CONSULTING P.C.
 K&A Engineering Consulting, P.C.
445 Hamilton Ave, Suite 406
White Plains, New York

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 CALCULATION OBJECTIVE................................................................................................ 2

2.0 ASSUMMPTIONS ............................................................................................................. 2

3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA/DESIGN BASIS...................................................................................... 2

4.0 REFERENCES/ SOURCE DOCUMENTS ............................................................................... 3

5.0 APPROACH/METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 3

6.0 COMPUTATIONS ............................................................................................................. 5

7.0 RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................. 5

8.0 ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................................... 6

Page1

K&A Engineering Consulting P.C.

17 Feb 2023 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY K&A ENGINEERING

CONSULTING P.C.
 K&A Engineering Consulting, P.C.
445 Hamilton Ave, Suite 406
White Plains, New York

1.0 CALCULATION OBJECTIVE

The calculation objective is to design a ground grid for Haverstock Substation and confirm
that the ground grid is adequate to ensure that a ground fault will be safe to personnel in
and around the new substation by analyzing the safe touch and step potentials.
Haverstock is a 345/230kV Substation with double breaker double bus arrangement with
seven transmission lines; two 345kV lines to Willis Substation and two 345kV lines to
Adirondack Substation, three 230kV lines to Moses Substation, three 345kV/230kV
autotransformers, and two 140MVAR capacitor banks.

2.0 ASSUMMPTIONS

None

3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA/DESIGN BASIS

3.1. Soil resistivity values are shown in Attachment #1.

3.2. The substation one-line diagram and general arrangement are shown in Attachment #2.
3.3. Body resistance is based on IEEE Standard 80-2013.
3.4. Fibrillation current calculation is based on a 50 kg body weight.
3.5. The highest fault current at Haverstock Substation is 27,908.6A (2L_G) with an X/R ratio
of 18.9.
a. The fault current is based on ASPEN One-liner Version 14.8 Bus Fault Summary
dated Fri Jun 11 23:10:51 2021.
b. For the grounding study the current injected in the ground grid is 41,862kA
(27908.6A times 1.5 p.u) with an X/R ratio of 20. Ground grid current is 1.5*the
worst-case fault per NYPA Design Criteria.
c. The ASPEN OneLiner Version 14.8 Bus Fault Summary is included in Attachment
#3.
3.6. Fault clearing time is set at 30 cycles (0.50 seconds) as per NYPA Substation Design Criteria
document.
3.7. Ground conductor – 4/0 AWG, 19 strand, annealed, soft drawn, 100% conductivity,
copper, burial depth 24 inches below native soil and 30 inches below substation finished
grade.
3.8. Ground rod - Copper clad 3/4, 10 ft length along all major equipment’s and along the
fence as per NYPA standard.
3.9. All vertical column (drilled pier) foundations are represented as Steel Re-Bar Concrete
Electrodes and electrically connected to the main ground grid for additional vertical
grounding conductors.
Page2

17 Feb 2023 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY K&A ENGINEERING

CONSULTING P.C.
 K&A Engineering Consulting, P.C.
445 Hamilton Ave, Suite 406
White Plains, New York

3.10. The number of 345kV transmission lines are four (4), 230kV transmission lines are three
(3); therefore, the total number of transmission lines are seven (7). The total number of
distribution feeders is zero (0).
3.11. A crush rock surface, with a 2,000 ohm-meter resistivity and thickness of 6 inches is over
the entire substation and extending 5 feet beyond the substation fence. As shown in
Grading Plan Cross Section Drawing, (Attachment #4), a 24 inches of permeable top rock
surface with three layers of different rock types is utilized with infiltration rate of greater
than 0.5 inch/hour. The top surface layer consists of 6 inches of surface course rock,
followed by 8 inches of filter course rock and 10 inches of reservoir course rock. Between
the filter course rock and reservoir course rock is a layer of non-woven filter fabric
material. The entire surface rock is modeled as a single layer of 24 inches of top rock in
the software.
3.12. The ground grid and all substation grounding are in accordance with NYPA’s Design
Criteria and Construction Standards.
3.13. Soil Resistivity and soil characteristics
a. Soil resistivity data was obtained during a soil investigation by Atlantic Testing
Laboratories during January 2022 using the Wenner 4-Point Soil-Resistivity Test
Method. Measurements were performed at two locations along two traverses at
each location in the vicinity of the proposed substation. The exact locations of the
traverses as well as the actual resistivity measurements are included in Attachment
#1. All four traverses (the results from both tests) were entered into WINIGS to
obtain the two-layer soil model shown in Section 7.1

4.0 REFERENCES/ SOURCE DOCUMENTS

4.1. IEEE Std 80-2013 – IEEE Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding
4.2. NYPA Substation Design Guide, Section 9 – Grounding
4.3. NYPA Substation Design Criteria Document, Smart Path Connect, Burns and McDonnel
Consultants, P.C. Rev C
4.4. Atlanta Testing Laboratories, ATL Report No. CD10187E-03-01-22 Smart Path Connect –
Proposed Haverstock Substation, dated March 25, 2022.

5.0 APPROACH/METHODOLOGY

5.1. The resistivity data that was measured in 2022 is included in Attachment #1. The
resistivity data that was measured (four sets of readings) was entered into and used by
WINIGS to compute the Dynamic Model Fit Report and resulting Two-Layer Soil Model
required for the calculation. The two-layer soil model is included in Attachment #5.
5.2. The ground grid is optimally designed based on the minimally acceptable grid dimensions.
Several iterations of different size grids were analyzed using the WINIGS version 7.7C
Page3

17 Feb 2023 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY K&A ENGINEERING

CONSULTING P.C.
 K&A Engineering Consulting, P.C.
445 Hamilton Ave, Suite 406
White Plains, New York

computer program. The minimum-sized grid was determined to be 30-ft x 30-ft. The
ground-grid layout is shown in Attachment #6.

5.3. Fault current through the grid:

a. The substation grounding is designed to be safe for a fault current of 41.86kA with a
fault duration of 0.50 seconds as specified in the NYPA Design Criteria.
b. During a ground fault event, the fault current splits through all conductive paths,
including the ground grid, ground/shield wires and the earth. For transmission and
distribution stations, IEEE Std 80-2013 considers the design of a ground grid based on
fault current returning to ground through shield wires on overhead and armor on
underground power lines. As such, part of the fault current is diverted to areas outside
the substation, thereby reducing the amount of fault current injected into the ground
grid.
c. To determine the split factor, the proposed layout of the Haverstock substation
consists of seven (7) transmission lines and zero (0) distribution feeders; the one-line
diagram is included in Attachment #2.
d. Split factor for this study was estimated using the current splits curve extracted from
the IEEE Std 80-2013 Figure C.19 which is included in Attachment #8. It was
determined using the graphical method at a grid resistance of 0.3663 ohms obtained
for the design from the WinIGS Software. The Rp value intersects the 7/0 interpreted
curve at a split factor of 0.26. A conservative value of 30% split factor was chosen to
model the grounding system. The fault current is multiplied by the split factor to
obtain the current through the ground grid which is calculated as (Fault Current X Split
Factor = 41.86 * 30%) 12.559kA.
e. The category C and 50/50 remote/local fault current contributions is used to
determine the split factor because in the proposed Haverstock Substation both local
and remote ground-fault current will be present under fault conditions. The local
current originates at the autotransformer neutrals and the remote current comes
from the 230kV transmission lines. The autotransformer is sized to supply the load on
the 230kV lines. The equal power is assumed out of the autotransformer, and thus
local and remote fault currents are expected to be in the 50% level.
5.4. Conductor Sizing
The conductor size is verified by the program to ensure the fault current does not lead to
fusing of conductors. WINIGS is used to calculate minimum ground conductor size per
IEEE Std 80-2013. The software determines the minimum standard conductor size, for
current through ground grid 12.559kA, as 82.4 kcmil which indicates conductor size of 4/0
AWG copper (as stipulated in NYPA design standard) is adequate to safely discharge the
grid current to the ground. The conductor fusing size calculation is shown in Attachment
#9.
Page4

17 Feb 2023 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY K&A ENGINEERING

CONSULTING P.C.
 K&A Engineering Consulting, P.C.
445 Hamilton Ave, Suite 406
White Plains, New York

5.5. Ground rods and conductors are added and/or removed as required to meet safe step
and touch potentials.
5.6. Step and Touch Potentials
Based on the above conditions, the WINIGS program calculates the step and touch
potentials throughout the station to ensure all areas of the station are safe for personnel
in and around the station. Step and touch potential plots are shown in Attachment #7.

6.0 COMPUTATIONS

Computations were performed using WINIGS Software. Data input and all computation
results can be found in Attachment #10.

7.0 RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

7.1 WINIGS was used to calculate the two-layer soil model using the resistivity data shown in
Attachment #1 as described above. Table 7.1 summarizes the resistivity, tolerance, and
thickness of the layers. Further soil model details are included in Attachment #5.
Table 7.1 Two Layer soil model computed by WinIGS

Layer Number Resistivity Tolerance Thickness

(Ohm-Meter) (Ohm-Meter) (ft)
Upper (1) 535.1 ±265.6 2.0
Lower (2) 167.4 ±36.9 Infinite

7.2 The design provided use of a Copper 4/0 AWG, 19 strand, annealed, soft drawn, 100%
conductivity. This conductor exceeds the minimum requirement and is an industry
standard size.
7.3 The designed grid as shown in Attachment #6 meets the safety criteria set out by IEEE 80-
2013. Areas where the maximum touch potential exceeds the minimum safety threshold
outside the station is beyond the reach of hazardous surfaces and is also considered safe.
7.4 Calculated maximum permitted and achieved step and touch values are as follows:

Voltage Maximum Permitted Maximum Achieved Margin

Type Voltage (V) Voltage (V) (%)
Touch 616.6 538.9 14.42
Step 2003.9 212.0 842.36

7.5 Grid spacing and Ground Rods is shown on Drawing 100-HS-3C01 included as Attachment
#11.
7.6 Bill of Material is shown in Attachment #12.
Page5

17 Feb 2023 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY K&A ENGINEERING

CONSULTING P.C.
 K&A Engineering Consulting, P.C.
445 Hamilton Ave, Suite 406
White Plains, New York

8.0 ATTACHMENTS

Attachment #1 Subsurface Investigation and Report by Atlantic Testing

Laboratories, Section 5.4, Attachment B (Resistivity Test Locations)
and Attachment G (Electrical Resistivity Test Results)
Attachment #2 One-Line Diagram and General Arrangement Plan
Attachment #3 ASPEN OneLiner Version 14.8 Bus Fault Summary
Attachment #4 Grading Plan Cross Section Drawing
Attachment #5 Two-layer Soil Model
Attachment #6 Ground Grid Layout
Attachment #7 Touch & Step Potential Plots
Attachment #8 Split Factor
Attachment #9 Conductor Fusing Size
Attachment #10 Complete WINIGS Simulation
Attachment #11 Optimized Grounding Grid Layout Drawing
Attachment #12 Bill of Materials

Page6

17 Feb 2023 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY K&A ENGINEERING

CONSULTING P.C.
 Attachment #1
Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical
Evaluation by Atlantic Testing Laboratories
 ATLANTIC TESTING LABORATORIES, Limited

Field Soil Electrical Resistivity Report

ATL Project No. CD10187E-03 Project: NYPA Smart Path Connect - Haverstock SS
Client: United ECI Test Date/Time: 01/13/2022; PM
Weather Condition Snow Soil Condition: Wet, Snow Cover 2
Ambient Temperature: 19϶F Test Method: Wenner 4-Pin Soil Resistivity Test
Test Completed by: I. Spelta ASTM G 57 / IEEE 81
Advanced Geosciences, Inc. - SuperSting R1/IP,
Test Instrument: Serial No.: S1708249
DC-Memory Earth Resistivity Meter

Field Test Data

Approx. 2-Cycle
TEST Apparent Soil
Probe 'a' Probe Test Standard Measured
LOCATION
Spacing Depth Current, I Deviation, ʍ Resistance, ё Resistivity 1
(ft) (in) (mA) (%) (ohms) (ohm-cm)
2 2 20 0.0 317.1 121,449
5 2 20 0.0 34.29 32,833
10 2 20 0.1 10.39 19,897
15 2 20 0.0 5.668 16,281
SRT-1 20 2 10 0.2 3.824 14,646
N-S 30 3 20 0.0 2.947 16,931
40 3 20 0.0 2.690 20,605
60 6 20 0.0 1.349 15,500
80 6 50 0.0 1.237 18,951
100 6 50 0.1 0.9753 18,677
2 2 20 0.0 239.0 91,537
5 2 20 0.0 48.75 46,678
10 2 5 0.0 11.27 21,582
SRT-1 15 2 10 0.1 6.130 17,608
E-W 20 2 20 0.0 4.090 15,665
30 3 20 0.0 2.752 15,810
40 3 5 0.2 2.038 15,611
60 6 10 0.0 1.459 16,764
80 6 20 0.0 1.195 18,307
100 6 20 0.0 1.044 19,993
1
Calculation: Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) = 191.5 x Probe Spacing (ft) x Resistance (ohm)
2
Partial tree and scrub brush cover.
3
Test Location: See Boring Location Plan
 Field Electrical ResistivityTesting
Proposed Haverstock Substation
NYPA Smarth Path Connect Project
Massena, St. Lawrence County, New York
Test Location: SRT-1
Test Date/Time: January 13, 2022; PM
ATL Project No.: CD10187E-03
150,000
Apparent Electrical Resistivity, Ÿ-cm [ohm-cm]

125,000
SRTͲ1[NͲS]
SRTͲ1[EͲW]
SRTͲ1AVERAGE
100,000

75,000

50,000

25,000

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Probe Spacing 'a', [ft]
 ATLANTIC TESTING LABORATORIES, Limited

Field Soil Electrical Resistivity Report

ATL Project No. CD10187E-03 Project: NYPA Smart Path Connect - Haverstock SS
Client: United ECI Test Date/Time: 01/13/2022; PM
2
Weather Condition Snow Soil Condition: Wet, Snow Cover
Ambient Temperature: 19϶F Test Method: Wenner 4-Pin Soil Resistivity Test
Test Completed by: I. Spelta ASTM G 57 / IEEE 81
Advanced Geosciences, Inc. - SuperSting R1/IP,
Test Instrument: Serial No.: S1708249
DC-Memory Earth Resistivity Meter

Field Test Data

Approx. 2-Cycle
TEST Apparent Soil
Probe 'a' Probe Test Standard Measured
LOCATION
Spacing Depth Current, I Deviation, ʍ Resistance, ё Resistivity 1
(ft) (in) (mA) (%) (ohms) (ohm-cm)
2 2 20 0.0 47.92 18,353
5 2 20 0.0 31.58 30,238
10 2 20 0.0 12.52 23,976
15 2 20 0.1 9.713 27,901
SRT-2 20 2 20 0.0 4.379 16,772
N-S 30 3 20 0.0 2.588 14,868
40 3 20 0.0 1.931 14,791
60 3 20 0.0 1.590 18,269
80 6 50 0.1 1.273 19,502
100 6 50 0.0 1.011 19,361
2 2 20 0.0 43.74 16,752
5 2 20 0.0 27.31 26,149
10 2 20 0.0 10.02 19,188
SRT-2 15 2 20 0.1 6.548 18,809
E-W 20 2 20 0.0 4.339 16,618
30 3 20 0.0 2.971 17,068
40 3 20 0.0 1.754 13,436
60 6 50 0.0 1.256 14,431
80 6 50 0.0 1.025 15,703
100 6 50 0.1 0.9322 17,852
1
Calculation: Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) = 191.5 x Probe Spacing (ft) x Resistance (ohm)
2
Tree and scrub brush cover.
3
Test Location: See Boring Location Plan
 Field Electrical ResistivityTesting
Proposed Haverstock Substation
NYPA Smarth Path Connect Project
Massena, St. Lawrence County, New York
Test Location: SRT-2
Test Date/Time: January 13, 2022; PM
ATL Project No.: CD10187E-03
50,000
Apparent Electrical Resistivity, Ÿ-cm [ohm-cm]

45,000

SRTͲ2[NͲS]
40,000
SRTͲ2[EͲW]

35,000 SRTͲ2AVERAGE

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Probe Spacing 'a', [ft]
 ATLANTIC TESTING LABORATORIES, Limited

Field Soil Electrical Resistivity Report

ATL Project No. CD10187E-03 Project: NYPA Smart Path Connect - Haverstock SS
Client: United ECI Test Date/Time: 01/13/2022; AM
2
Weather Condition Snow Soil Condition: Wet, Snow Cover
Ambient Temperature: 19϶F Test Method: Wenner 4-Pin Soil Resistivity Test
Test Completed by: I. Spelta ASTM G 57 / IEEE 81
Advanced Geosciences, Inc. - SuperSting R1/IP,
Test Instrument: Serial No.: S1708249
DC-Memory Earth Resistivity Meter

Field Test Data

Approx. 2-Cycle
TEST Apparent Soil
Probe 'a' Probe Test Standard Measured
LOCATION
Spacing Depth Current, I Deviation, ʍ Resistance, ё Resistivity 1
(ft) (in) (mA) (%) (ohms) (ohm-cm)
2 2 20 0.0 73.12 28,005
5 2 20 0.0 23.45 22,453
10 2 20 0.1 8.917 17,076
15 2 20 0.0 5.113 14,687
SRT-3 20 2 20 0.0 4.289 16,427
N-S 30 2 20 0.0 3.710 21,314
40 2 20 0.0 2.788 21,356
60 6 50 0.1 1.214 13,949
80 6 50 0.0 0.9124 13,978
100 6 50 0.1 0.9537 18,263
2 2 20 0.1 101.90 39,028
5 2 20 0.1 17.15 16,421
10 2 20 0.1 7.828 14,991
SRT-3 15 2 20 0.2 4.624 13,282
E-W 20 2 20 0.0 3.398 13,014
30 3 20 0.0 2.411 13,851
40 6 50 0.0 1.982 15,182
60 6 50 0.0 1.330 15,282
80 6 50 0.1 1.122 17,189
100 6 50 0.0 0.9989 19,129
1
Calculation: Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) = 191.5 x Probe Spacing (ft) x Resistance (ohm)
2
Open field/residential yard.
3
Test Location: See Boring Location Plan
 Field Electrical ResistivityTesting
Proposed Haverstock Substation
NYPA Smarth Path Connect Project
Massena, St. Lawrence County, New York
Test Location: SRT-3
Test Date/Time: January 13, 2022; AM
ATL Project No.: CD10187E-03
50,000
Apparent Electrical Resistivity, Ÿ-cm [ohm-cm]

45,000
SRTͲ3[NͲS]
40,000
SRTͲ3[EͲW]
SRTͲ3AVERAGE
35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Probe Spacing 'a', [ft]
 Attachment #2
One- Line Diagram and General Arrangement
NORTHERN NEW YORK PRIORITY TRANSMISSION PROJECT
MASSENA, NEW YORK
(100-HS) HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION
NORTHERN NEW YORK PRIORITY TRANSMISSION PROJECT
MASSENA, NEW YORK
(100-HS) HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION
NORTHERN NEW YORK PRIORITY TRANSMISSION PROJECT
MASSENA, NEW YORK
(100-HS) HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
· ST. LAWRENCE-FDR POWER PROJECT
· MASSENA, NEW YORK
·
· (100-HS) HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION
·
 ST. LAWRENCE-FDR POWER PROJECT
MASSENA, NEW YORK
(100-HS) HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION
LEGEND

ISSUED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
 Attachment #3
ASPEN OneLiner Version 14.8 Bus Fault Summary
ASPEN OneLiner Version 14.8 Bus Fault Summary

Fri Jun 11 23:10:51 2021

Data File Name: C:\Users\ezzat.khalafalla\Downloads\CY19_ATBA_SC_V1.4_SEGMENT_1125_ON_POSTPROJECT_NEW.OLR
Study date: None
Output File Name: C:\Temp\Trial 1 6-11-21.CSV
File Comments:
NYISO FALL 2014
NON-PUBLIC
REPRESENTATION.
INFORMATION.
RESTRICTED
DO NOT COPY. DISTRIBUTE ONLY TO AUTHORIZED RECEIVING PARTY. THIS INFORMATION IS FOR USE SOLELY BY THE RECEIVING PARTY FOR PERFORMING ITS RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER THE NYISO'S TARIFFS.

PREFAULT VOLTAGE PROFILE: FROM LINEAR NETWORK SOLUTION

GENERATOR IMPEDANCE: SUBTRANSIENT
IGNORE PHASE SHIFT: NO
IGNORE LOADS: YES
IGNORE TRANSMISSION LINE G+jB: YES
IGNORE SHUNTS WITH + SEQ IMPEDANCE: YES
IGNORE TRANSFORMER LINE SHUNTS: NO
MOV ITERATION: OFF
ENFORCE GENERATOR CURRENT LIMIT: OFF
SIMULATE VOLTAGE-CONTROLLED CURRENT SOURCES: YES
ANSI X/R RATIO CALCULATION: ON
IN X-ONLY NETWORK WHEN X=0 USE X=0.0001 P.U.
IN R-ONLY NETWORK WHEN R=0 COMPUTE R USING METHOD 1
WITH Rc=0.0002 P.U. X/R =125 FOR GENERATORS; =60 FOR TRANSFORMERS; =10 FOR REACTORS; =10 FOR OTHERS
ASSUME Z2 TO BE SAME AS Z1 FOR GENERATORS AND PHASE SHIFTERS.
X/R RATIOS: ANSI/IEEE
CURRENTS ARE IN AMPS AND IMPEDANCES ARE IN OHMS
VOLTAGES ARE IN KV LINE TO GROUND
FAULT BUSES: ALL BUSES
KV RANGES: 0-999
BUS NUMBERS: 0-9999999
SORT BUSES BY: NAME & KV
EXCLUDE TAP BUSES: YES

__3LG__ __2LG__ __1LG__ __L-L__ Maximum Maximum

NO BUS KV LOCATION AREA ZONE Prefault V PU
Phase Cur Gnd Cur MVA X/R Phase Cur Gnd Cur MVA X/R Phase Cur Gnd Cur MVA X/R Phase Cur Gnd Cur MVA X/R Phase Cur Gnd Cur Z+ Z2 Z0
407120 #109(NYSE&G) 138 ALLEGHEN 226 25 1.01 2915.8 0 707.4 31.4 2941 2609.6 713.5 26.4 2756.8 2756.8 668.8 14.7 2525.2 0 612.6 31.4 2941 2756.8 0.67804 27.7261 0.68831 27.7256 4.8268 32.3325
0 ADIRONDACK 115 ADIRONDA 5 5 0.99 10357.1 0 2037.8 25.8 10487.6 10298 2063.4 23.6 10323.7 10323.7 2031.2 20.6 8965 0 1763.9 25.8 10487.6 10323.7 0.25295 6.32719 0.25332 6.33352 0.57369 6.36677
1478350 ADIRONDACK 230 ADIRONDA 5 5 0 0 0 0 9999 0 0 0 9999 0 0 0 9999 0 0 0 9999 0 0 0 -1.00E+08 0 -1.00E+08 0 -1.00E+08
0 ADIRONDACK R 115 ADIRONDA 5 6 0.98 12078.8 0 2364.3 6.5 11328.6 8602.8 2217.4 6.7 10051.4 10051.4 1967.4 7 10463.3 0 2048 6.5 12078.8 10051.4 1.15244 5.27728 1.15208 5.27441 1.8054 8.48321
0 ADR345 345 VALKIN 5 6 0.99 14959 0 8816 11.4 14371.8 11846.1 8469.9 11.2 13202.7 13202.7 7780.9 10.9 12935 0 7623.2 11.4 14959 13202.7 1.292 13.0687 1.29584 13.1088 2.45293 18.1751
0 Haverst230_1 230 VALKIN 5 6 1 22402.7 0 8916.2 21.3 24554.4 27908.6 9772.6 18.9 24746.2 24746.2 9848.9 16.6 19307.3 0 7684.2 21.3 24746.2 27908.6 0.4093 5.90769 0.4141 5.9652 0.73908 4.1342
0 Haverst230_2 230 VALKIN 5 6 1 22402.7 0 8916.2 21.3 24554.4 27908.6 9772.6 18.9 24746.2 24746.2 9848.9 16.6 19307.3 0 7684.2 21.3 24746.2 27908.6 0.4093 5.90769 0.4141 5.9652 0.73908 4.1342
0 Haverst230_3 230 VALKIN 5 6 1 22402.7 0 8916.2 21.3 24554.4 27908.6 9772.6 18.9 24746.2 24746.2 9848.9 16.6 19307.3 0 7684.2 21.3 24746.2 27908.6 0.4093 5.90769 0.4141 5.9652 0.73908 4.1342
0 Haverst345 345 VALKIN 5 6 0.99 15334.5 0 9114.5 23.5 15626.1 16193 9287.9 22.9 15705.4 15705.4 9335 22.5 13240.4 0 7869.8 23.5 15705.4 16193 0.88439 12.89 0.89303 12.967 1.0717 11.8811
 Attachment #4
Grading Plan Cross Section Drawing
 (100-HS) HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION
ST. LAWRENCE-FDR POWER PROJECT
MASSENA, NEW YORK

OHW OHW OHW

OHW OHW OHW
OH W OHW OHW
OHW OH W OHW
OHW

OHW OHW
OH W OH W
OHW OHW
OHW OHW
OHW OHW
OHW

OHW
OHW
OH W
OHW
OHW
OHW

OHW
OHW

X
OHW
OHW

OHW
OHW
X OHW
OHW OHW
OHW
OHW

OHW
OHW OHW
OH W OHW
X OHW OHW OHW
OH W OHW OHW
OHW

OH W
Dean M. Nimmo

OHW OHW
OHW OH W OHW
OHW OH W OHW
OHW OH W
OH W
X OH W
OHW
OHW
OHW

OHW OHW OHW

OH W OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW
OHW OHW
OH W OHW
OHW

OH W OH W
OHW OHW
OHW
OH W
X

OHW
OH W
OHW
OH W
OHW

OHW
OHW
OHW OHW
OHW OHW
OHW OHW
OHW OHW
OHW

OHW OHW OHW

X

OH W OHW OHW
OHW OHW OHW
OHW OH W OHW
OHW OHW OHW
OHW

OHW OHW OHW

OHW OH W OHW
OHW OH W OH W
CONSTRUCTION
X

OHW OHW OHW

OHW OHW OHW
OHW

OH W OH W
OH W OH W
ISSUED FOR

OHW OHW
OHW OHW
OHW
OH W
X

OHW
OHW
X

OHW OHW
X

OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW

OHW
OHW

X
OHW

X
OHW

222

225

OHW OHW OHW

OHW

X
OHW

OHW

X
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW

X
OHW
OHW

X
OHW

X
OHW
OHW

X
OHWOHW

X
OHW

X
OHW
OHW

X
OHW
OHW

X
OHW

X
OHW
OHW

≥
OHW
OHW
OHW
X OHW
OHW
OHW
X OHW
OHW
OHW
X OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHW
OHWOHW
OHW
 Attachment #5
Two-Layer Soil Model
 Attachment #6
Ground Grid Layout
 Attachment #7
Step and Touch Potential Plots
Touch Potential over Yard Crushed Rock (2000 Ω.m, 24” thickness):
Step Potential over Yard Crushed Rock (2000 Ω.m, 24” thickness):
Attachment #8
Split Factor
 Attachment #9
Conductor Fusing Sizing
Conductor Size:
 Attachment #10
Complete WINIGS Simulation
Souce:

Soil Resistivity:
Grid Resistance:

Safety Criteria:
Grid Resistance:

Surface Material:
Conductor Size Used:
 Touch Voltage:
Touch Voltage:
Step Voltage:
 Attachment #11
Optimized Grounding Grid Layout Drawing
 ST. LAWRENCE-FDR POWER PROJECT
MASSENA, NEW YORK
(100-HS) HAVERSTOCK SUBSTATION

·
·
·
·
·
Attachment #12
Bill of Material
Bill of Material