NANGA NANGA FRANÇOISE IRLANDE

GROUP 1
ICTU20233760
1- A) Define observation as a primary method of collecting data:
Observation is a primary method of collecting data in research and involves systematically
watching and recording behaviors, events, or phenomena as they naturally occur in their
natural setting. It involves direct observation of individuals, groups, or situations without
any manipulation or intervention from the researcher.
B) Types of observation :
There are several types of observation that can be used in data collection:

1. Structured Observation: In structured observation, the researcher defines specific behaviors

or events to be observed and records them systematically. This type of observation involves
the use of pre-defined coding schemes or checklists to record data.

2. Unstructured Observation: Unstructured observation allows for more flexibility and

exploration. The researcher does not have a specific set of behaviors or events to observe but
instead takes a more open-ended approach, recording any relevant information that emerges
during the observation.

3. Participant Observation: In participant observation, the researcher becomes an active

participant in the setting being observed. They may engage in conversations, participate in
activities, and immerse themselves in the context to gain a deeper understanding of the
behaviors and experiences of the participants.

4. Non-participant Observation: Non-participant observation involves observing individuals

or groups without actively participating in their activities or interactions. The researcher
remains separate from the observed setting and focuses on collecting data from a distance.

5. Naturalistic Observation: Naturalistic observation involves observing behaviors and events

in their natural setting without any intervention or manipulation by the researcher. The goal is
to capture real-life behaviors as they naturally occur.

6. Controlled Observation: In controlled observation, the researcher creates a controlled

environment or situation to observe specific behaviors or phenomena. This type of
observation allows for more control over variables and can be useful when studying specific
aspects of behavior or testing hypotheses.
C) Problems associated with observation as a method of data collection :

1. Observer Bias: Observers may have their own biases, expectations, or preconceived notions
that can influence their interpretation of the observed behaviors. This can lead to subjective
and potentially inaccurate data.

2. Hawthorne Effect: The presence of an observer can alter the behavior of the participants
being observed. This is known as the Hawthorne effect, where individuals may modify their
behavior or performance due to the awareness of being observed, leading to artificial or
biased data.

3. Limited Generalizability: Observations are typically conducted in specific settings and

contexts, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other situations or
populations. The observed behavior may not be representative of how individuals behave in
different environments.
NANGA NANGA FRANÇOISE IRLANDE
GROUP 1
ICTU20233760
4. Ethical Concerns: In some cases, observation may involve intruding on individuals' privacy
or violating ethical guidelines, especially when observing sensitive or private behaviors.
Researchers must ensure that they obtain informed consent and protect the confidentiality and
anonymity of participants.

5. Time and Resource Intensive: Observation can be a time-consuming and resource-intensive

method, requiring trained observers, equipment, and significant amounts of time for data
collection and analysis. This can limit the feasibility of using observation in certain research
studies.

6. Limited Access: Researchers may face challenges in gaining access to certain settings or
populations for observation. Some settings may have restricted access, while others may
require special permissions or approvals to conduct observations.

7. Interpretation Challenges: Interpreting observed behaviors can be complex, as it often

requires subjective judgment and inference on the part of the observer. Different observers
may interpret the same behavior differently, leading to inconsistencies in data interpretation.
D) Under what circumstances may observation as a method of data collection be used ?::

1. Naturalistic settings: Observation is often used in naturalistic settings where researchers

want to study behavior as it occurs naturally, without any manipulation or interference. This
can include observing people's behavior in public spaces, workplaces, classrooms, or homes.

2. Qualitative research: Observation is commonly used in qualitative research to gather rich

and detailed data about individuals' behaviors, interactions, and experiences. It can provide in-
depth insights into social processes, cultural practices, and the meanings attributed to certain
behaviors.

3. Exploratory research: Observation can be particularly useful in exploratory research when

little is known about a particular phenomenon or when researchers want to generate
hypotheses or ideas for further investigation. Observing behaviors and interactions can help
researchers identify patterns, themes, or trends that may guide future research.

4. Cross-cultural research: Observation can be valuable in cross-cultural research to compare

and contrast behaviors and practices across different cultures or societies. By directly
observing and documenting cultural practices and behaviors, researchers can gain a deeper
understanding of cultural differences and similarities.

5. Behavior analysis: Observation is commonly used in behavior analysis to study and

measure specific behaviors, such as in studies on child development, animal behavior, or
clinical psychology. Researchers can systematically observe and record behaviors to analyze
patterns, frequencies, and correlations.

6. Ethnographic research: Observation is a key method in ethnographic research, where

researchers immerse themselves in a particular culture or community to understand the social
dynamics, norms, and practices. Observing daily routines, rituals, and interactions can provide
valuable insights into the culture being studied.

7. Validation of self-reported data: Observation can be used to validate or corroborate self-

reported data obtained through interviews or surveys. By directly observing behaviors or
NANGA NANGA FRANÇOISE IRLANDE
GROUP 1
ICTU20233760
events that participants report, researchers can verify the accuracy and reliability of the self-
reported information.
2- A) Define interview as a primary method of collecting data :
An interview is a primary method of collecting data in which a researcher engages in a
structured or semi-structured conversation with an individual or a group of individuals to
gather information, insights, and perspectives on a specific topic or research question. The
purpose of an interview is to obtain firsthand accounts, opinions, experiences, and subjective
viewpoints from participants.
B) Interview classification :

1. Structured interviews: In structured interviews, the interviewer asks a predetermined set of

questions in a fixed order. The questions are usually closed-ended and require specific
answers. This type of interview is often used when researchers want to collect standardized
data and compare responses across participants.

2. Semi-structured interviews: Semi-structured interviews combine predetermined questions

with the flexibility to explore new topics or probe further based on the participant's responses.
The interviewer follows a general interview guide but can deviate from it to gather more
detailed information or seek clarification.

3. Unstructured interviews: Unstructured interviews are open-ended and allow for free-
flowing conversations. There is no predetermined set of questions, and the interviewer relies
on the participant's responses to guide the conversation. This type of interview is often used
when researchers want to explore complex or sensitive topics in-depth.

4. Group interviews: Group interviews involve multiple participants who are interviewed
together. Group interviews can be structured or unstructured, and they provide an opportunity
to capture group dynamics, interactions, and collective perspectives on a topic.

5. Individual interviews: Individual interviews involve one-on-one conversations between the

interviewer and a single participant. Individual interviews allow for more focused and detailed
discussions, as the researcher can tailor the questions and probe deeper into the participant's
experiences and opinions.

6. Phone or remote interviews: Phone or remote interviews are conducted over the phone or
through video conferencing platforms. They offer convenience and flexibility, allowing
researchers to interview participants who are geographically distant or have time constraints.

7. Exit interviews: Exit interviews are conducted when a person is leaving an organization or
a program. They aim to gather feedback, opinions, and experiences related to the person's
departure and their overall experience with the organization or program.

8. Expert interviews: Expert interviews involve interviewing individuals who have specialized
knowledge, expertise, or experience in a particular field. These interviews are often used to
gather insights, opinions, and perspectives from experts to inform research or decision-making
processes.
C) What criteria should a researcher base on to choose between an interview schedule and a
questionnaire ?:
1. Research objectives: Consider the specific goals and objectives of the study. If the aim is to
gather in-depth, nuanced, and detailed information, an interview schedule may be more
NANGA NANGA FRANÇOISE IRLANDE
GROUP 1
ICTU20233760
suitable. On the other hand, if the goal is to standardized data that can be easily quantified and
analyzed, a questionnaire may be more appropriate.

2. Nature of the research question: Evaluate the complexity and depth of the research
question. If the topic requires probing, clarification, or exploration of multiple perspectives,
an interview schedule allows for flexibility and follow-up questions. A questionnaire, on the
other hand, is better suited for straightforward and closed-ended questions.

3. Sample size: Consider the number of participants involved in the study. If the sample size
is large, conducting individual interviews may be time-consuming and resource-intensive. In
such cases, a questionnaire can efficiently collect data from a larger number of participants.

4. Time and resources: Assess the available time and resources for data collection. Interviews
generally require more time and effort to conduct, transcribe, and analyze compared to
questionnaires. Questionnaires can be distributed to participants who can complete them at
their convenience, saving time and effort for both researchers and participants.

5. Participant characteristics: Consider the characteristics of the participants, such as their

literacy levels, language proficiency, or comfort with technology. If participants have limited
literacy skills or face language barriers, an interview schedule may be more appropriate to
ensure clear communication and understanding. Questionnaires can be challenging for
participants with low literacy levels or limited language proficiency.

6. Privacy and sensitivity: Evaluate the sensitivity of the topics being explored. If the research
involves sensitive or personal information that participants may be uncomfortable sharing in a
written format, an interview schedule allows for a more confidential and secure environment.

7. Data analysis requirements: Consider the desired level of detail and complexity in data
analysis. Interviews provide rich qualitative data that requires in-depth analysis, often
involving coding and thematic analysis. Questionnaires, on the other hand, generate
quantitative data that can be analyzed using statistical methods.

It is important to note that researchers can also use a combination of interview schedules and
questionnaires to gather comprehensive data. This mixed-methods approach can provide a
more holistic understanding of the research question by capturing both qualitative and
quantitative data.
3-Explain the ethical issues that should be considered by a researcher while collecting data :
Ethical considerations are crucial in any research study, and researchers should adhere to ethical guidelines to ensure the
well-being and rights of participants. Here are some ethical issues that should be considered
while collecting data:

1. Informed consent: Researchers must obtain informed consent from participants before
collecting data. Participants should be fully informed about the purpose, procedures, risks,
benefits, and any potential consequences of participating in the study. They should have the
right to refuse or withdraw from the study at any time without facing any negative
consequences.

2. Privacy and confidentiality: Researchers should ensure the privacy and confidentiality of
participants' personal information. This includes protecting their identities, keeping their data
NANGA NANGA FRANÇOISE IRLANDE
GROUP 1
ICTU20233760
secure, and using anonymization techniques when reporting findings. Participants should be
assured that their data will be kept confidential and used only for research purposes.

3. Voluntary participation: Participation in research should be voluntary, and participants

should not be coerced or pressured to take part. Researchers must avoid any form of
manipulation or undue influence that may compromise participants' autonomy. Participants
should have the freedom to decline participation or withdraw from the study without facing
any negative consequences.

4. Minimizing harm: Researchers should take measures to minimize any potential harm or
discomfort to participants. This includes avoiding physical, psychological, or emotional harm.
Researchers should conduct a risk assessment and take appropriate steps to mitigate any
potential risks to participants.

5. Beneficence: Researchers should prioritize the well-being and welfare of participants. They
should design studies that maximize potential benefits while minimizing risks. Researchers
should consider the potential impact of the study on participants and society as a whole.

6. Respect for cultural diversity: Researchers should respect the cultural values, beliefs, and
practices of participants. They should ensure that research methods and procedures are
culturally sensitive and appropriate for the population being studied. Researchers should be
aware of potential power imbalances and strive for equitable relationships with participants.

7. Transparency and honesty: Researchers should provide accurate and honest information
about the study, its purpose, and any potential conflicts of interest. They should report
findings accurately and avoid misrepresentation or manipulation of data.

8. Institutional review and approval: Researchers should seek ethical approval from relevant
institutional review boards or ethics committees before conducting the study. These bodies
ensure that research meets ethical standards and protects the rights and welfare of participants.

9. Data sharing and publication: Researchers should consider the ethical implications of data
sharing and publication. They should ensure that participants' identities are protected when
reporting findings and consider any potential consequences of sharing sensitive data.

By considering these ethical issues, researchers can conduct studies that respect the rights and
well-being of participants, maintain scientific integrity, and contribute to the advancement of
knowledge in an ethical manner.