Practical Report

by Dereshan Moodley

Submission date: 14-Oct-2022 04:57PM (UTC+0200)

Submission ID: 1925290487
File name: Prac_Report_22004405.pdf (1.52M)
Word count: 1197
Character count: 6713
Practical Report
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

70
Instructor

/100
PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14
RUBRIC: ILLUMINATION (ILLM101) 2.80 / 4

PRESENTATION (10%) 3/4

The report is well laid out, the presentation is excellent and the spelling and grammar are of high
standard

SCALE 1 The report is well laid out, the presentation is excellent and the spelling and
(4) grammar are of a high standard.

SCALE 2 The report is well laid out, the presentation is acceptable and the spelling and
(3) grammar are of a reasonably good standard.

SCALE 3 The report is laid out poorly, the presentation is poor and the spelling and
(2) grammar are of a poor standard.

SCALE 4 The report is laid out unacceptably low standard, the presentation, spelling and
(1) grammar are of an unacceptably low standard

CONTENT (5%) 3/4

A broad overview on the different elements of assignment

SCALE 1 All components are included and outcome is fully achieved

(4)

SCALE 2 Most components are included and outcome is mostly achieved.

(3)

SCALE 3 Most components are included and outcome is only partly achieved
(2)

SCALE 4 Little if any components are included and outcome is NOT achieved.
(1)

INTRODUCTION (10%) 3/4

The introduction does all the following, gives an overview of the project, the limitations of the
project, discusses the benefits of the project and has a broad plan that leads the reader through the
project process.

SCALE 1 The scope and objectives of the report are adequately defined. Most of the
(4) objectives are adequately contextualized.

SCALE 2 The scope and objectives of the report are defined. Some objectives are
(3) adequately contextualized.

SCALE 3 Although the scope and objectives of the report are defined, they are
(2) inadequately contextualized.

SCALE 4 The scope and objectives of the report are poorly defined and inadequately
(1) contextualized.

REPRESENTDATA (10%) 3/4

The style and quality of tables, illustrations and/or graphical representations are of a high quality.
Adhere to all formal conventions and standards.
SCALE 1 The style and quality of tables, illustrations and/or graphical representations
(4) are of a high quality. Adhere to all formal conventions and standards.

SCALE 2 The style and quality of tables, illustrations and/or graphical representations
(3) are of a satisfactory quality. Adhere to most conventions and standards.

SCALE 3 The style and quality of tables, illustrations and/or graphical representations
(2) are not of a good quality throughout. Standards and conventions are not always
adhered to.

SCALE 4 The style and quality of tables, illustrations and/or graphical representations
(1) are of a disappointing quality All conventions are not adhered to

COLLECTION (20%) 3/4

Ability to gather background information (existing knowledge, research, and/or indications of the
problem)

SCALE 1 Collects sufficient relevant background information from appropriate sources,

(4) and is able to identify pertinant/critical information.

SCALE 2 Collects sufficient relevant background information from appropriate sources.

(3)

SCALE 3 Collects some relevant background information from appropriate sources.

(2)

SCALE 4 Minimal or no ability to collect relevant background information

(1)

ORGANIZATION (10%) 2/4

Ability to organize evidence to demonstrate patterns, and highlight differences and/or similarities.

SCALE 1 Organizes evidence with perception, demonstrating patterns, and highlighting

(4) differences and/or similarities integral to the investigation.

SCALE 2 Organizes evidence to demonstrate patterns, differences and/or similarities

(3) important to the investigation.

SCALE 3 Organizes evidence in a way that is somewhat effective in demonstrating

(2) patterns, differences, and/or similarities that are applicable to the investigation.

SCALE 4 Minimal or no ability to organize evidence.

(1)

RESULTS (20%) 3/4

Results/measurements where taken accurately as discussed in lectures and practical sessions..

SCALE 1 All components are included and outcome is fully achieved

(4)

SCALE 2 Most components are included and outcome is mostly achieved.

(3)

SCALE 3 Most components are included and outcome is only partly achieved
(2)
SCALE 4 Little if any components are included and outcome is NOT achieved.
(1)

CONCLUSION (10%) 2/4

Ability to state conclusions and make recommendations as a result of the investigation.

SCALE 1 States logical conclusions and makes insightful recommendations, and

(4) identifies those that are pertinent/critical.

SCALE 2 States logical conclusions and makes appropriate recommendations.

(3)

SCALE 3 States conclusions and makes recommendations that may or may not be
(2) relevant to the investigation.

SCALE 4 Minimal or no ability to state conclusions or make recommendations.

(1)

LIMITATION (5%) 3/4

Ability to identify limitations and implications

SCALE 1 Identifies all significant limitations and implications.

(4)

SCALE 2 Identifies many important limitations and implications.

(3)

SCALE 3 Identifies some limitations and implications.

(2)

SCALE 4 Minimal or no ability to identify limitations or implications.

(1)