Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCOPE:
- Nature of Inquiry - Identifying the Problem
- Quantitative and Qualitative
Research
NATURE OF INQUIRY
Research - Step-by-step investigation
• Uses a standardized approach in answering:
✓ Questions
✓ Solving problems or making the unknown
known.
• Investigations of new facts leading to discovery of:
✓ New ideas
✓ Methods
✓ Improvements
• A tested approach of thinking and employing
validated instruments and steps
✓ In order to obtain an adequate solution to a
problem
Characteristics of - Systematic
research • Follows a logical and scientific manner
✓ Macro
➢ Chapters
✓ Micro
➢ Details per chapter
- Objective
• Purely based on facts
• Without bias
- Clear
• Choice of variable
✓ Should be explained by researcher
- Empirical
• Based on concrete evidences
✓ Plagiarism
GOALS FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH:
1. Produce - Provide best practice of operation based from research
evidencebased studies
practices - Must be published to be accessed and adopted for use
Page | 1
2. Establish - Continuous development of one's chosen profession
credibility in the through research
profession - Essential in producing new procedures, programs and
practices
3. Observe - Each profession is held accountable to their work
accountability in - Every action must have a rationale
the profession
4. Promote - Findings in research should be shared and utilized by
costeffectiveness future studies
through - Useless if not made known to the public
documentation
Importance of 1. Provides scientific basis or methodology
Research 2. Continuous development and further productivity
3. Advances professional and personal qualifications
4. Develop tools for assessing effectiveness
5. Provide solutions to problems
6. Impacts decision-making
7. Develops and evaluate alternative approaches
Roles of a researcher 1. As Principal Investigator
2. As member of a research team
3. As identifier of researchable problems
4. As evaluator of research findings
5. As user of research findings
6. As patient or client advocate during the study
7. As subject/respondent/participant
Research paradigm - Outline in conceptualizing and conducting the research
RESEARCH FOUNDATIONS
1. Research - Describes how the study will fill the “knowledge gap”
purpose
2. Research - Significant problem that needs knowledge
problem
3. Research - Quantitative
questions • How much
• How often
• To what extent
- Qualitative
• What
• Why
• How
i. Hypotheses - Possible answers to the questions
- Either confirmed or rejected by the data collected
4. Conceptual - Outline or paradigm
framework - Presents the topic being studied, various variable and
contexts
• How they relate or influence each other
Page | 2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1. Review of - Analyzes existing knowledge regarding the research
Literature topic
2. Research design - What is the best of collecting and analyzing the data
3. Data collection - Determines:
• Participants
• Instruments
• Methods of procedures
4. Data analyses - How the data will be treated and analyzed
• How results will make sense
5. Conclusion - Summary of the lay results
• Its relevance to the research problem
DIFFERENT TYPES OF RESEARCH
1. Scientific - Seeks to explain natural phenomenon
research • By generating credible theories
- Involves formulating:
• Hypotheses
• Testing predictions and theory
- Requires rational and statistical evidence to draw
conclusions
2. Research in the - Define the purpose of human existence
humanities • By tapping into historical facts and future possibilities
- Derived explanations from human experiences
• Cannot be measured by facts and figures alone
3. Artistic research - Expounds the current accepted concepts
• Open them to further interpretation
- Generates new knowledge
• Through artistic practices
ETHICS IN RESEARCH
Importance of ethics - Promotes the pursuit of:
• Knowledge
• Truth
• Credibility
- Fosters values that are essential to collaborative work
- Ethical norms ensure that researchers are held
accountable to the public
- Adherence helps build public support for research
Ethical Codes and 1. Honesty
Policies for Research 2. Objectivity
3. Integrity
4. Openness
5. Care
6. Respect for Intellectual Property
7. Confidentiality
8. Responsible Publication
Page | 3
9. Responsible mentoring
10. Respect for colleagues
11. Social Responsibility
12. Non-discrimination
13. Competence
14. Legality
15. Human Subject Protection
Rights of Participants - Voluntary Participation
- Informed consent
- Risk of Harm
- Confidentiality
- Anonymity
Plagiarism and - Plagiarism
Intellectual Property • Violation of intellectual property rights
- Intellectual property
• Industrial property
✓ Patents
✓ Trademarks and designs
• Copyright
✓ Published works
- RA 8293
• Intellectual Property Code of the Philippine
Page | 5
- Standards are usually used in they are done in the laboratory and
choosing instruments, sampling findings can be influenced by the
procedures and statistical researcher’s perspective
treatment - Having a large study sample require
spending more resources and
preset or fixed alternatives answers
may not necessarily reflect the true
answers of the participants
Qualitative research - Naturalistic method
- Deals with the issue of human complexity by exploring it
directly
- Makes use of materials that are
• Narrative
• Subjective
- Collection of data is continuous until saturation
- Emphasis on:
• Human complexity
• Man's ability to decide and create experiences
- Focuses on gaining insights and understanding about
individual's perception and interpretation
i. Types of a. Phenomenological Research
Qualitative - Seeks to find the essence or structure of an experience
Research • By explaining how complex meanings are built
✓ Out of simple units of inner experience
b. Ethnographic Research
- Involves collection and analysis of data
• About cultural groups or minorities
c. Case Study
- In-depth examination of an individual, group of people
or institution
d. Grounded-Theory Study
- Involves comparing collected units of data
• Against one another
✓ Until properties that state relations between
them emerge
Advantages Disadvantages
- Requires few participants - Sometimes not well understood like
- Useful in describing complex quantitative research
phenomenon - The presence of the researcher can
- Can be examined in detail and in- affect the participants' responses
depth during interviews
- Interviews are not restricted to - Difficult to make quantitative
specific questions predictions
- Provides individual case information - Data analysis is often time-
consuming
Page | 6
- Provides understanding and - The results are more easily
description of people's personal influenced by the researcher's
experiences biases
- Might have low credibility
I hope these reviewers are able to help you with your studies. Try not to cry. Study well!
(Partner credits: Luis Lampa (St. Matthew))
Page | 10