Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steady state conditions imply that time has no influence on the temperature distribution within an
object, and temperature may be different at different locations within the object.
The heat flux (heat flow density or heat flow rate intensity) due to conduction in the x-direction
through a uniform homogeneous slab of material (Fig. 5.1) is given by Fourier’s first law of
conduction
T1 T2
dT/dX q
x x
Where T1 and T2 are the surface temperatures of the respective faces of the slab and X is its
Eqn. 5.1 is also known as Fourier’s law, which can be rearranged in the form
Q = A▲T
X/ K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5.2)
1
Equation (5.2) shows that for uni-dimensional, steady-state conduction, the rate of heat transfer
Q, is proportional to the temperature difference across the slab (ΔT) and the area through which
heat is transferred, and is inversely proportional to the quantity X/K or thermal resistance.
Thermal resistance (X/K) is a measure of the difficulty with which heat is conducted through a
solid. It depends upon the thermal conductivity of the material, and the dimension in the
direction of heat flow, in this case the slab thickness. Note that thermal resistance has units of m 2
KW−1. Table 5.1 lists the thermal conductivities of a range of food and non-food materials.
Example 5.1
In an experiment to measure the thermal conductivity of meat, beef was formed into a square
section block 5cm × 5cm and 1 cm thick. The edges of the block were insulated and heat was
supplied continuously to one face of the block at a rate of 0.80W. The temperatures of each face
were measured with thermocouples and found to be 28.5 and 23.3◦C, respectively. What is the
The integrated form of Fourier’s law, Eq. (5.1), can be rearranged explicitly in terms of thermal
conductivity:
K=
2
5.2.1 Conduction in a Composite Slab (Total Conductance)
If the slab in 5.1.1 is a composite of materials of both different thickness and different thermal
conductivity, as in Fig. 5.2, Eq. (5.1) cannot be used for the whole slab; because there is no
single value of either X or K, and thermal conductivities cannot be added together. However,
applying Eq. (5.2) to each layer in turn gives the respective temperature differences as
▲T1 = Q1 / A * X1 / K1
▲T2 = Q2 / A *X2 / K2
▲T3 = Q3 /A * X3 / K3 . .. . . . . . . … . . . . . .. . . . . . . (5.3)
where Q1, Q2 and Q3 are the rates of heat transfer in each layer, respectively.
Now
▲T = T1 −T4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5.6)
And
3
T1 T2 T3 T4
X1 X2 X3
K1 K2 K3
Also, there is no generation or accumulation of heat at the interfaces between each layer,
therefore,
Q1 = Q2 = Q3 = Q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5.8)
Thus, substituting from Eqs. (5.3) and (5.8) into Eq. (5.7), the overall temperature difference
becomes
Therefore,
Q = A ▲T
( X1 / K1 + X2 / K2 + X3 / K3) (5.10)
The rate of heat transfer through a composite slab is now proportional to area and to the overall
temperature difference across the whole slab and is inversely proportional to the sum of the ther-
mal resistances of each layer. This is an extremely important point: thermal resistance is an
additive property, whereas thermal conductivity is not. A general version of Eq. (5.10) is now
4
Q = area ×∑ temperature difference
∑ thermal resistance (5.11)
This relationship can be applied to any steady-state problem involving either conduction or
Example 5.2
It is proposed to build a cold store having an outer wall of concrete (100 mm thick) and an inner
wall of wood (10 mm thick), with the space in between (100 mm) filled with polyurethane foam.
If the inner wall temperature is 5◦C and the outer wall is maintained at the ambient air
temperature of 20◦C, calculate the rate of heat penetration. The wall area is not specified and
therefore only the rate of heat penetration per unit area can be determined.
Q = ▲T
( X1 / K1 + X2 / K2 + X3 / K3) 5.12
The overall temperature difference across the composite wall is the difference between 20 and
5◦C. Let the subscripts 1, 2 and 3 represent concrete, insulation and wood, respectively. Thus,
Q /A = (20−5)
0.10 / 0.80 + 0.10 / 0.025 + 0.01 / 0.17 Wm−2
Q/A= (20−5)
(0.125 + 4.0 + 0.0588) Wm−2
Q / A = 3.59Wm−2
5
3 Note the magnitudes of the thermal resistances. That of the insulation is significantly greater
Many problems in food engineering involve the conduction of heat in a radial direction through
the walls of pipes and tubes (Fig. 5.3). If a hot liquid is conveyed along a pipe, heat will be lost
from the liquid to the surroundings, assuming the surroundings are at a lower temperature, even
if the pipe is insulated. E.g, in some heat exchangers, in which heat is deliberately transferred
from one fluid to another, the fluids are carried in tubular conduits or pipes.
Here, the temperature varies with radius r of the pipe, but is constant along the length of the pipe
Where,
It is possible to base the rate of heat transfer on the internal surface area, but it is conventional to
use the external area. The thermal resistance is inversely proportional to thermal conductivity
and is a function of the inner and outer radii of the cylinder which define the distance in the r-
6
direction through which heat is transferred. As before this has units of m 2KW−1. It is essential to
realize that the temperatures in Eq. (5.13) are surface temperatures and not the temperatures of
the fluids (the hot food fluid and the air surrounding the pipe).
Example 5.3
Water flows through an uninsulated pipe which has a diameter of 0.05 m, and a wall thickness of
0.01 m. The thermal conductivity of the pipe wall is 50Wm −1 K−1 and the inside and outside
surface temperatures of the pipe are 70 and 69.5◦C, respectively. Calculate the radial heat loss
per metre length. Adapting Eq. (5.13), the rate of heat transfer in a radial direction per unit length
of pipe is
For convenience, the external radius may be cancelled from this expression and therefore
Q / L = 2π (70−69.5)
1 /50 ln (0.035/ 0.025) Wm−1
Q / L = 466.8Wm−1
7
In order to reduce heat loss from a pipe conveying a hot food fluid a layer of insulation material
of low thermal conductivity may be placed around the pipe (Fig. 5.4). If the insulation has a
thermal conductivity kB and an outer radius r3 then the rate of heat transfer through it is
Q = 2πr2L▲T
r2 / kA ln r2 / r1+ r2/ kB ln r3 / r2 (5.14)
Note that Eq. (5.14) is based on the external surface area of the pipe 2πr2L.
Introduction
Every moving fluid carries an associated energy that causes heat to be transferred from one point
to another; these points are at different temperatures due to such movement. This type of heat
temperature, the fluid receives heat that is transferred within it by movement of the particles of
the fluid. This movement causes heat transport by convection to happen, and it can occur in
natural or forced form. The first case occurs when there is no mechanical agitation and is
attributed to density differences at different points of the fluid caused by the effect of
temperature. On the other hand, forced convection occurs when the movement of the fluid is
produced mechanically using devices such as agitators and pumps, among others. Heat transfer
by convection is very important when studying the heat exchange between two fluids separated
by a wall in such a way that one of them gives up heat to the other, so that the first fluid cools
while the second heats up. The devices in which this heat transmission is performed are called
heat exchangers.
8
5.3.1 Film Heat Transfer Coefficient
Imagine a container of liquid to which heat is supplied as indicated in Fig.5.5. Further, Imagine a
small element or packet of liquid, perhaps only a few molecules thick, in contact with the heated
surface of the container. Heat is transferred by conduction through the container wall and
initially by conduction to the liquid packet. The temperature of the liquid increases and
consequently it experiences thermal expansion and a decrease in density. Thus the packet of
liquid rises (because of buoyancy forces) and as it moves away from the hot container wall it is
replaced by cooler liquid which will in turn be heated and will rise through the body of liquid.
The circulation pattern which is established in this way is known as a convection current and is
responsible for the transfer of heat throughout the mass of a fluid (either liquid or gas). The rate
at which fluid is circulated, and thus the rate at which heat is transferred, can be increased by
deliberately agitating the fluid, for example by the addition of an impeller. A current which is
established solely because of thermal expansion is called free or natural convection, whilst
In pipe flow, forced convection can be introduced by ensuring that the flow is turbulent.
However, it is accepted that, there is a region of more slowly moving and often laminar fluid
adjacent to the wall of the pipe which may be termed the boundary layer. Beyond this layer the
fluid has a much greater velocity and may well be turbulent. We may assume that heat is
transferred by conduction through this layer and it follows that the layer contains almost all of
the resistance to heat transfer. This is because most fluids (Non Newtonian) have relatively low
thermal conductivities, and also because of the rapid heat transfer from the edge of the boundary
layer into the bulk of the fluid. Thus it is valid to write for this layer
9
Q = A▲T
x/k (5.15)
But, because x (the boundary layer thickness) can neither be predicted nor measured easily, the
thermal resistance cannot be determined and x / k is replaced with the term 1 / h, where h is a
Q = hA▲T (5.16)
Where
h=k/x
Heat transfer coefficients are thus empirical measures of the ability to transfer heat in particular
circumstances and are used to describe heat transfer within the entire fluid both across any
boundary layer and across turbulent or higher velocity regions. Values of the heat transfer
coefficient must be determined in order to solve any realistic industrial heat transfer problem and
much effort in process engineering research has been, and is, directed to this end. Increasing the
velocity of the fluid has the effect of promoting turbulence (Reynolds’ experiment) and thus of
reducing the thickness of the boundary layer. Therefore, as x / k can be approximated to 1 / h, the
heat transfer coefficient increases with increasing fluid velocity. Values of h depend also upon
the physical properties of the fluid and upon geometry. For example, there is a difference
between flow in a circular cross-section pipe and flow in an annulus with consequent differences
in the rate at which heat is transferred even though materials and temperatures may be the same
in each case. By inspecting Eq. (5.16) it is clear that the units of a film heat transfer coefficient
10
5.3.2 Radial Convection
The analysis of convection can now be extended to radial geometries. Consider again the
problem of conveying a hot food fluid in a circular cross-section pipe. The rate of heat transfer
from the hot fluid (temperature Ti) inside the pipe to the inner pipe surface (temperature T 1) is
Q= 2πr2L ▲T
r2 r1hi + r2 ln r2 / r1 + 1/ ho
k (5.17)
Where
K = thermal conductivity
▲T = change in Temperature
Example 5.4
Steam at 100◦C condenses on the outside of an alloy tube of thermal conductivity 180 W m−1 K−1
through which water flows at a velocity such that the tube-side film heat transfer coefficient is
4000 W m−2 K−1. The film heat transfer coefficient for condensing steam may be assumed to be
10,000 W m−2 K−1. The tube is 5 m long, has an external diameter of 25 mm and a wall thickness
of 1 mm. If the mean temperature of the water is 15◦C, calculate the rate of heat transfer to the
11
water. It is instructive to consider the magnitudes of the three thermal resistances involved. The
This problem may be solved simply by substituting the relevant quantities into Eq. (5.17).
Therefore,
= 5.79×10−6 m2 KW−1
= 2.72×10−4 m2 KW−1
The film resistance on the outside of the tube is = the reciprocal of the film coefficient i.e 1/h o
= 10−4 m2 KW−1.
= 3.78×10−4 m2 KW−1
Substituting for the temperature driving force and the external tube surface area (2πr 2L) gives the
Q = 2π0.0125×5(100−15) W
3.78×10−4
Q = 88.42kW
In a condenser, as in any heat exchanger, the conductive resistance should be minimised and
12
5.4 Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
Thermal resistance is a measure of the difficulty with which heat is transferred and is inversely
proportional to the film heat transfer coefficient. It is possible to rewrite Eq. (5.11), replacing the
sum of thermal resistance term with the reciprocal of an overall heat transfer coefficient, U. Thus
Q = UA▲T (5.18)
The overall heat transfer coefficient includes both conductive and convective resistances and for
the case of heat transfer to or from a fluid in a circular cross-section pipe is given by
Which becomes
1 / U = 1/ hi + r1 ln r2 / r1 + r1 / r2 ho (5.20)
k
Example 5.5
Calculate the overall heat transfer coefficient for the condenser in Example 5.4.
The overall heat transfer coefficient is the reciprocal of the sum of thermal resistance.
U = 2647Wm−2 K−1
Radiation is the term given to the transfer of energy by electromagnetic waves; specifically, ther
mal radiation is the transfer of energy by that part of the electromagnetic spectrum with
wavelengths between 10−7 and 10−4 m. All wave forms are propagated at what is known as the
13
velocity of light c, which has a value of approximately 3×108 ms−1. The relationship between the
c = λυ (5.21)
Where frequency is measured in Hz. Note that wavelengths are often quoted in nanometers (nm)
All bodies at a temperature above absolute zero emit thermal radiation but the quantities
involved only become significant at temperatures well above ambient. Unlike conduction and
convection, radiation can be propagated through a vacuum and the most important example for
human life is that of solar radiation; that is, thermal radiation travelling through space (as an
electromagnetic wave) from a body with a surface temperature of about 6000 K. On reaching the
earth this energy is then dissipated by conduction and convection. In many industrial examples
of heat transfer conduction and convection occur simultaneously with radiation, despite the very
dissimilar mechanisms involved. However, thermal radiation is the dominant heat transfer
mechanism in a number of food processing applications such as drying, especially where the
product is in a granular form with a relatively low initial moisture content. Some examples are
tunnel or conveyor driers, vacuum band or shelf driers used for the manufacture of ‘puffed’ or
expanded cereal products and freeze driers. Radiation is also the principal mechanism in solar
drying which is used extensively in the developing world for the drying of food in the open air.
In addition, mention may be made of baking, roasting and heat shrink packaging.
All radiation falling upon a surface is either absorbed, reflected or transmitted. The fraction of
incident radiation which is absorbed is called the absorptivity of that surface and is denoted by α.
14
Similarly, the reflectivity ρ and transmissivity τ of the surface are the fractions of incident
radiation which are reflected from the surface or transmitted through the body respectively. It
α + ρ +τ =1 (5.22)
Most solids, except those that are transparent to visible light (e.g. quartz, glass and some plastics)
α + ρ =1 (5.23)
α + τ =1 (5.24)
At this point it is essential to understand that the emission, absorption and reflection of radiation
are surface phenomena. The rate at which thermal radiation is emitted is a function of the surface
temperature and surface characteristics such as colour. Equally, the colour of a surface
determines its absorptivity. The absorption of radiation takes place only at the surface and
thereafter heat transfer through the body is by conduction. The nature of a surface, especially its
roughness, has a considerable effect upon reflection. For a specular reflector the angle of
incidence equals the angle of reflection. This will be the case where the roughness dimension is
very much smaller than the wavelength (Fig. 5.5a). However, if the roughness dimension is
considerably greater than the wavelength of the incident radiation, the reflection will be diffuse,
that is it is reflected in all directions and with varying intensities (Fig. 5.5b). For a specular
Fig. 5.6 Surface characteristics: (a) Specular surface, (b) Diffuse surface
15
surface, for example polished metals, the reflectivity approaches unity and the absorptivity will
be close to zero whereas for a diffuse surface the absorptivity approaches unity.
Emissive power E is defined as the total emitted radiant thermal energy leaving a surface per unit
time and per unit area, over all wavelengths and in all directions. This should not be confused
with radiosity which is the total radiant thermal energy leaving a surface, per unit time and per
unit area, and which includes both emitted and reflected radiation. A black body is defined as one
which absorbs all radiation falling upon it (regardless of directional or spectral differences), that
is,
α B = 1.
The emissive power of a black body depends upon the fourth power of its absolute temperature,
thus
EB = σT4 (5.25)
Where σ is the Stefan−Boltzmann constant and has a value of 5.67×10−8 Wm−2 K−4.
Example 5.5
Determine the total emissive power of a black body at 1027◦C. Emissive power depends upon
= 1300
16
EB =161.9kW m−2
5.5.4 Emmisivity
Values of emissivity must be known in order to calculate rates of radiative heat transfer between
surfaces. Kirchoff’s law states ‘the emissivity of any surface equals its absorbtivity when it is in
thermal equilibrium with its surroundings’ This can be shown to be the case by considering two
bodies in an adiabatic enclosure. Let I be the incident radiation rate, A1 and A2 the respective
areas of the two bodies and α1 and α2 the respective absorbtivities. Now, at equilibrium, the
radiation falling on body 1 will equal the radiation emitted by body 1, and therefore, for body 1
where E1 and E2 are the respective emissive powers. Thus, from Eq.s. (5.26) and (5.27),
E1 / α1 = E2 / α2 = E / α (5.28)
In other words for all bodies the ratio of emissive power to absorptivity is the same and depends
E / E B = α / αB (5.29)
17
Table 5.5 Approximate values of emissivity for various surfaces
Dough 0.85
Water 0.95
Ice 0.97
Imagine two infinite parallel plates 1 and 2. The rate at which radiant heat is emitted by surface 1
and absorbed by surface 2 is E 1A 1α 2 whilst heat is emitted by surface 2 and absorbed by surface
1 at a rate E 2A 2α 1. The net rate of heat transfer between the two surfaces is then
Q1→2 =E 1A 1α 2 −E 2A 2α 1 (5.31).
18
The emissive powers E 1 and E 2 are fractions of the emissive powers of a black body radiator and
therefore
E 1 =e 1EB1
E2 =e2EB2
(5.32)
EB1 = σT14
EB2 = σT24
(5.34)
Consequently,
Now the areas of surfaces 1 and 2 are equal (they are both infinite plates of area A) and the
absorbtivities and emissivities are the same (e and α, respectively) for similar surfaces, hence
And for the case of black surfaces where α = e = 1 the above reduces to
19
Example 5.6
Two infinite parallel plates are held at 850 and 700◦C, respectively. If each plate approximates to
a black body, calculate the rate of heat exchange between them. For a black body e B = αB =1 and
q = 49.03kW m−2
In all heat transfer operations, it is assumed that the temperature of any point of the solid remains
constant with time. However, there are cases in which temperature inside the solid, besides
changing with position, also changes with time. Example is the case of freezing and thawing, in
which it is desirable to know the time needed to reach a certain temperature at a determined point
of the solid, or to know the temperature of such a point after some time. This process is
Unsteady state (or transient) heat transfer is that phase of the heating and cooling process when
the temperature changes as a function of both location and time. By contrast, in steady state heat
transfer, temperature varies only with location. In the initial unsteady state period, many
important reactions in the food may take place, e.g in pasteurization and food sterilization
20
processes, the unsteady state period is an important component of the process. Analysis of
temperature variations with time during the unsteady state period is essential in designing such a
process.
Since temperature is a function of two independent variables, time and location, then for a one
Where;
T = Temperature (oC)
t = Time (s)
K * ▲T / ▲r = h (Ta – Ts)
Where
quantitative terms, this property gives the amount of heat that will be conducted per unit time
through a unit thickness of material if a unit temperature difference exists across the thickness.
Hence, materials with high thermal conductivities are best for transferring heat, while those with
21
low thermal conductivities are better suited as insulators. Example, metals are highly conducting
in nature, therefore have high thermal conductivities; while materials like asbestos, wood, and
cotton are poor conductors, and therefore have low thermal conductivities. Most high moisture
foods have thermal conductivity values closer to that of water, while the thermal conductivities
of dried, porous foods is influenced by the presence of air with its low thermal conductivity
value. The thermal conductivity of ice is almost four times that of water, and that is why
naturally frozen foods have higher thermal conductivities than normal foods, which makes them
The thermal conductivity values of certain materials are tabulated or predetermined. However,
values can also be determined using empirical predictive equations for the purpose of process
calculations where temperature may be changing. Some of these equations are given below:
For fruits and vegetables with a water content greater than 60%, the following equation had
k = 0.148 + 0.493Xw
Where
k = thermal conductivity
For meats and fish at a temperature range between 0 to 60oC, water content 60-80% wet
k = 0.08 + 0.52Xw
22
Another empirical equation developed by Sweat for solid and liquid foods is as follows:
Where,
X = Mass fraction
Subscripts c,p,f,a, and w are carbohydrate, protein, fat, ash, and water respectively.
The coefficients are thermal conductivity values of the pure component. It should be
noted however that the thermal conductivity of water in a food is different from that of
pure water.
Choi and Okos gave the following expression that includes the influence of product
n
k = ∑ kiYi
i=1
Where a food material has n components, ki is the thermal conductivity of the ith
Yi = Xi / ρi
n
∑ (Xi / ρi)
i=1
Where,
Xi = Weight fraction
23