You are on page 1of 1

>= 96(A+) 90-95.99(A) 86-89.99(B+) 80-85.99(B) 76-79.99(C+) 70-75.99© 66-69.99(D+) 60-65.99(D) <60.

00(F) Zero (0)


Abstract Excellent abstract Very good project Clear and complete Clear and complete Clear project Clear project Clear project background. Project background not Project background not No evident.
(10 Marks) Detailed and precise background. project background. project background. background. background. Very brief description of clear/very brief description clear/very brief
description of Detailed and precise Detailed and precise Relevant but brief Relevant but brief Very brief description proposed system and of proposed system and description of proposed
proposed system and description of description of description of description of of proposed system project objectives. project objectives. system and project
project objectives. proposed system and proposed system and proposed system and proposed system and project objectives. objectives.
project objectives. project objectives. project objectives. and project
objectives.

Contains strong
composition skills
Contains good
Demonstrates including a clear and Contains above
Contains strong composition skills
excellent composition thought-provoking average composition
composition skills with including a relevant Demonstrates competent
skills including a clear writeup, although skills, including a Writeup may be flawed in Writeup skills may be
clear writeup, although writeup, although composition skills
and thought-provoking development, diction, clear, insightful the clarity of the introduction flawed in two or more Poor description of each
development, diction, development, diction, including adequate
thesis, appropriate and sentence style thesis, although . Diction, syntax, and areas. Diction, syntax, and phase and related with No evidence in
Introduction (10 marks) and sentence style may and sentence style may development and
and effective may suffer minor development may be mechanics may seriously mechanics are excessively the development of the documentation or
suffer some flaws.. The suffer minor flaws. organization, although
organization, lively and flaws. Shows careful insufficient in one affect clarity. Minimally flawed. Fails to accomplish introduction with no softcopy
writing effectively Shows careful and the development of ideas
convincing supporting and acceptable use of area and diction and accomplishes the majority of the goals of the references and citations.
accomplishes the goals of acceptable use of may be trite, assumptions
materials, effective mechanics. The writing style may not be the goals of the assignment assignment.
the assignment with mechanics. The writing may be unsupported in
diction and sentence effectively consistently clear
some improvement accomplishes the goals more than one area
skills, and perfect or accomplishes the of the assignment and effective
near perfect goals of the
mechanics including assignment
spelling and
punctuation

Appropriate
Appropriate
identification of the Acceptable
Very good identification of the Poor vulnabirities
Excellent identification Good identification of attribute types, the vulnabirities related to Minimal vulnabirities Poor ivulnabirities related No evidence of any
identification of threat attribute types, the related to each threat
of the threat types, vulnabirities related to vulnabirities related each threat and some related to each threat and to each threat and some of identification of
types, valbnurabilities vulnabirities related to and some explanation of
the valnurabilities each threat and some to each threat and explanation of some explanation of explanation of the attribute types,
Threat ,Valnurability & related to each threat each threat and some countermeasures
Countermeasures (20 marks) related to each treat explanation of some explanation of countermeasures countermeasures countermeasures the pre-processing
and some explanation explanation of procedures,. Writeup
and its counter countermeasures countermeasures procedures,. Use procedures,. Found some procedures,..Found errors. procedures, results
of countermeasures countermeasures with a lot of errors.
measures . Met above procedures,. Met procedures,. Found Found some errors. errors. Met some Hardly met some undertaken in
Comparatively the procedures,.Found Hardly met some
the Requirements requirements. some errors. Met Met some requirements. requirements.. documentation
explanation is brief . minor error. Met requirements.
all/some requirements.
all/some requirements.
requirements.

Argument is Presents a clear, Paper recognizes the


thoroughly supported focused,and complexities of its Good argument and Generally well- Doesn’t respond
Paper’s argument is Argument is unclear, &
by strong, specific, compelling argument throughout supported by relevant constructed flow of appropriately to the No evidence in
Best Practices (10 marks) supported by limited weak.Evidence is
and appropriate literature.Paragraphs the analysis .Clear evidence, though not idea but lack of assignment,disconnected documentation or no
evidence that is only insufficient,misconstrued or
evidence.Paper flows clearly guide the sentences to develop always the strongest acknowledging other from course concepts and identifiable argument
occasionally relevant. misrepresented
logically to craft a reader through a strong relationships or specific quotations. views. materials
cohesive argument progression of ideas. between ideas Does not respond to the
assignment, displays no
familiarity with course
concepts or materials

Appropriate
Excellent Discussion Very good discussion Good discussion and Appropriate discussion discussion and Poor Discussion and Poor Discussion and No evidence of any
Discussion&conclusion (20 marks) and conclusion with and conclusion conclusion references and conclusion conclusion conclusion references and conclusion and not discussion and
references related references related with related with all/some references and related references and related with minimum related with some conclusion in
with all citations. all citations. citations. with all/some citations. related with some Acceptable Discussion citations. citations. documentation
citations. and conclusion ; Minimal discussion and
reference with conclusion of the results
minumum citations with some citations

A report has been A report has been A report has been


Excellent report has
A very good report has A good report has been produced of a structure produced of a structure produced of a structure The report is weak in its The report is very poor in
been produced showing
been produced of a good produced of a good containing suitable containing suitable containing thst need presentation. Sections presentation with its The written document does
no deficiencies in No evidence in
structure containing structure containing sections but it's layout sections but it's layout suitable sections and it's required will be present but construction lacking elements not adequately represent a
organization. The work documentation or
suitable sections and suitable sections and and presentation is need and presentation is layout and presentation is not addressed at a suitable of the report (e.g. unsuitable report.Falls far below the
will be of a professional softcopy
referenced relaed with all referenced relaed with improvement & inadequate & incomplete & level.Reference with structuring).References not standard for submission .
standard with references
citations. citations. referenced related with referenced related with referenced related with minumum citations related with some citation
Reporting and References(10 related with all citations
some citations. missing citations. missing citations.
marks)
Presenttion (20 marks)

The presentation had a clear No presentation or very poor


The presentation was very weak in
structure and included most of The presentation was weak in terms
terms of structure, contents, and presentation.The student did not
The presentation was the necessary parts and The presentation had a clear The presentation had a mod­ The presentation had weak of structure, contents, and details.
details. A low level of knowledge and answer or was not able to
excellent, with a clear details.Time Management and structure and included most of erately clear structure and in­ clear structure and did not The presentation had no clear Time management and English understanding of topic is interpret the majority of
structure and included all the English presentation were the required sections, but cluded the required contents, includ the required structure and did not includ the presentation were weak. demonstrated by the student. questions, and responses
necessary parts and contents good. some details were not but details of contents are not contents,and lack of details required contents,and lack of
with de­tails. Time presented. Time management provided. Time management of contents . Time details of contents . Time
management, and Eng­lish and English presentation and English presentation were management and English management and English
presentation were excel­lent. needed to be improved. satisfactory. presentation were moderate presentation were not satisfied

You might also like