Navigating the intricacies of a literature review can be a daunting task.

It requires extensive research,

critical analysis, and synthesis of existing literature on a particular topic. From defining research
questions to identifying relevant sources, conducting a literature review demands time, effort, and
expertise.

The process begins with formulating clear research objectives and defining the scope of the review.
This involves identifying key concepts, keywords, and search terms to effectively explore the
literature. Once the search strategy is established, researchers must sift through a vast array of
academic databases, journals, books, and other sources to gather pertinent literature.

However, the challenges do not end with the collection of sources. Evaluating the credibility,
relevance, and quality of each publication is crucial to ensuring the validity of the review.
Researchers must employ rigorous criteria to assess the methodological rigor, theoretical framework,
and empirical evidence presented in the literature.

Synthesizing the findings from diverse sources and identifying patterns, themes, and gaps in existing
research requires analytical skills and critical thinking. Moreover, organizing the literature in a
coherent and structured manner is essential to effectively communicate the insights gained from the
review.

Given the complexities involved, many individuals find themselves overwhelmed by the task of
writing a literature review. That's where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes in. Our team of experienced
writers specializes in conducting systematic literature reviews across various disciplines. With their
expertise and dedication, they can help you navigate the intricacies of the research process and
deliver a high-quality literature review that meets your specific requirements.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time, alleviate stress, and
ensure the success of your research endeavor. Contact us today to learn more about our services and
take the first step towards achieving your academic goals.
It is a comprehensive, transparent search that can be replicated and reproduced by other researchers.
You might be researching an area of biomedical science and wish only to include animal
investigations. When you test search, you simultaneously discover what terminology is common in
the field, and thus find more search terms. Key takeaways: A systematic review is a thorough and
detailed review of existing literature on a particular topic, designed to address a specific question.
The following checklist may be helpful during this review: Peer Review of Electronic Search
Strategies. You're looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey. Also look
for publication patterns by investigating if certain approaches to the topic were common during a
specific time. In other words, it is the process of searching and evaluating the available literature on
your chosen topic. Then this Historical Literature Review Example voices your familiarity with the
topic. The search terms within each block are combined with OR, then the blocks are combined with
AND. The mainstay for any professional research must be the use of peer-reviewed and edited
articles, and Scholar will not provide a robust enough search of these, and will also retrieve non-peer-
reviewed reports and documents. The methodology followed should be explained clearly and
logically. If you did wish to consider excluding types of articles, you might for example be doing a
medical review and may well wish to only include randomised controlled trials. You can find both
long and short APA simple report content on health, science, history, and so much more. Output
contains the citations and references from the publications you’ve uploaded. If you are writing a
literature review, you can take a sample note of the following points. You can elaborate more on the
topic of your thesis. Where will your education and career journey take you? If chemoprevention has
some preventive effect, less parasitemia should be observed among women exposed to the
medication (i.e., treatment). Few interventions are 100% effective, so scientists often talk about
reductions in the risk of bad outcomes like malaria. For example, searching for probiotics and
diarrhoeal disease may reveal areas of research focusing on children as opposed to adults for
example. The authors found that there were two sets of expertise required: that of gathering the
information to ensure completeness, and creating a literature review that could be repeated by a
different person later to yield largely the same information. If you search without quotation marks,
the terms are not kept together as a phrase. These preregistration plans include a specific search
strategy using specific search terms for individual scholarly databases so other researchers can
recreate the search. From here, identify the purpose or thesis for your topic. Anything that is unclear
will need to be checked by reviewing the full paper. Not every study is designed or implemented
equally, however, so review authors must also evaluate the potential for bias in each study to help the
reader make sense of the findings. It begins with the simple inclusion of a title and abstract, and
goes on to outline the introduction, methods, results, and discussion portions of your report. Address
how your approach to the topic reinforces or rejects previous approaches as well as how your work
contributes to the larger body of knowledge on your topic. A wide search means that not all search
results will be relevant. You can also find out which search terms were used to index your key
articles.
Output contains the citations and references from the publications you’ve uploaded. This reduces the
chance of bias and improves the reliability of the results. A systematic review article follows the
same structure as that of an original research article. Why do I mention systematic reviews in relation
to desk-top research. As such, the thesis or central argument of your historiography should explain
why your research on the topic contributes to or rejects previous historical analyses of your topic.
I’m talking about systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, students could gain a reasonable
idea from citations and journal rankings (albeit rough). This is the reason, many literature reviews are
mistily focused. You can therefore use a new Excel sheet for each step in the analysis to maintain a
good record of your process. The rows represent each study included in the review, and the columns
indicate the review authors’ determination about potential bias in each study. There are many
literature review sample outline examples available online, and many of them have to do with
whatever subject you’re handling. PubMed, for instance, uses the controlled vocabulary list MeSH
(Medical Subject Headings). Note that you would only rarely use all parts of the PICO-question in a
search; most of the time, you will focus on population and intervention. Conduct a search in
PROSPERO, for example, to ensure that there are no ongoing projects that resemble yours. One
inclusion criteria might be that assignment to study arms had to be random; an exclusion criteria
might be all studies without a control arm that used a placebo. There is a nice explanation of the use
of Boolean logic on Ithaca College Library website. Values greater than 75% may indicate that a
change in the meta-analysis method (random vs fixed effects) is needed. An effect size is a measure
of the strength or magnitude of a relationship, such as the relationship between taking a medicine
and experiencing a bad outcome. Try this course for free with R Upskill Membership. Then this
Project Management Literature Review Example is everything that takes it to start your own review.
If chemoprevention has some preventive effect, less parasitemia should be observed among women
exposed to the medication (i.e., treatment). Few interventions are 100% effective, so scientists often
talk about reductions in the risk of bad outcomes like malaria. They are self-contained pieces of
writing that can function as a stepping stone to a larger piece of writing or can enhance writers’
understandings of a topic. Although you may write a stand-alone literature review as a course
assignment to enhance your own knowledge as a student, scholars often write stand-alone literature
reviews to benefit the research community and discipline. Identifies the language of the logged in
user while browsing the website. Figure 3.3: Malaria chemoprevention for pregnant women living in
endemic areas. This should be followed by the overview or the simple outline, which includes the
scope of work (in this case, it is the scope of review). Writing a literature review requires research,
analysis, and synthesis. As a student you should rather do a structured literature review, including
only certain aspects of the methodology described on this page. The essence of a systematic review
lies in being systematic. Third, identify patterns in approaches to your topic.
Note that you would only rarely use all parts of the PICO-question in a search; most of the time, you
will focus on population and intervention. This will serve as the basis for your thesis statement.
Other tools can help you translate the search syntax used in different databases, for example,
Systematic Review Accelerator Polyglot. The goal of a systematic review is to be comprehensive
and to include every relevant article. Each study’s point estimate of the relative risk is plotted around
a line of “no effect.” A risk of 1 means that there is no difference between the intervention and
control groups. Consult your library subject guide to review databases appropriate for your topic.
You can quickly filter your results often by just looking at the titles and author names to identify
duplicates. They compare and contrast 14 review types, listing the strengths and weaknesses of each
review. You can find both long and short APA simple report content on health, science, history, and
so much more. To ensure that your work is efficient and effective, you should follow a clear process.
One way is to search directly in a given database’s thesaurus. After all, they can often take 6 to 18
months to complete. Before starting a systematic review, you should search these databases for any
registered reviews on the topic of your choice. The search strategy should be documented in full for
each database, and can be published in an appendix to the published review article. These themes
will also be used as the headings for your Matrix, which will be discussed in detail in Section B:
Planning and Researching. Cookie Duration Description cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary 1 year
Cookie created by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. You may also want to use a program that can
help you screen your references, such as Rayyan. The result should be a robust and reliable
assimilation of evidence in order to reach a reliable conclusion. The more search blocks you have, the
narrower your search will be; the narrower your search, the greater your risk of excluding relevant
articles. Sometimes grey literature, such as dissertations or clinical trials, is included in the search as
well. If so, you might consider proposing a collaboration or modifying your aims. Your second
move should be to consult a clinical librarian or someone with experience conducting a systematic
review for tips on setting up your project. Google does not filter the evidence in this manner. They
are often collaborative and tag, for instance, inclusion- and exclusion criteria. Anything that is unclear
will need to be checked by reviewing the full paper. It is just as important to identify gaps in
knowledge, as this will inform future areas of research. Can a search term be added that might
include this key article. How to write the literature review of your research paper 7 min read. SLRs
are a research method used to write an entire journal article. You're looking to give wings to your
academic career and publication journey. Cornell University Library has created a decision tree that
can help you determine what kind of review might best suit your goals and constraints.