Professional Documents
Culture Documents
𝐴(𝑙) ↔ 𝐵(𝑙)
𝑄𝑃 = 0
𝐶𝐴𝑜 = 9.3 𝑚𝑜𝑙/𝐿
𝐶𝐴 = 4.65 𝑚𝑜𝑙/𝐿
𝐶𝐴0 𝐹𝐴0 𝑦𝐴𝑜
= = =9 𝑚𝑜𝑙 3600 𝑠
𝐶𝐼𝑛0 𝐹𝐼𝑛0 𝑦𝐼𝑛𝑜 𝐹𝐵 = 20.375 = 73350 𝑚𝑜𝑙/ℎ
𝑠 1ℎ
𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 =?
𝑇𝑂 = 57°𝐶 = 330 𝐾
1−𝑛
1 1
7906 360−𝑇 1 𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝐾1 = 31.1 ∗𝑒 = ℎ𝑟 −1 ; 𝑇 = 𝐾 → 𝑆𝑖: ∙ ∴𝑛=1
𝑡 𝐿
1 1
−830 333−𝑇
𝐾𝐸𝑞 = 3.03 ∗𝑒 = 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 ; 𝑇 = 𝐾
0 1
𝑏
→ 𝐿𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑛é𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎: −𝜈𝐴 = 𝐾1 𝐶𝐴 − 𝐾2 𝐶𝐵 → 𝐴 ; 𝐶𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴0 1 − 𝑥𝐴 → 𝐵 𝑦 𝐶𝐵 = 𝐶𝐵0 + 𝐶𝐴0 𝑥𝐴
𝑎
𝐶𝐵 = 𝐶𝐴0 𝑥𝐴 → 𝐶
𝐾1 𝑘1 𝐾1
𝑆𝑖: = 𝐾𝐸𝑞 → 𝐾2 = →𝐷 → 𝑆𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝐵, 𝐶 𝑦 𝐷 𝑒𝑛 𝐴: −𝜈𝐴 = 𝐾1 𝐶𝐴0 1 − 𝑥𝐴 − 𝐶 𝑥
𝐾2 𝐾𝐸𝑞 𝐾𝐸𝑞 𝐴0 𝐴
𝑥𝐴
→ 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜: −𝜈𝐴 = 𝐾1 𝐶𝐴0 1 − 𝑥𝐴 − → 𝐴´
𝐾𝐸𝑞
→ 𝐸𝑐 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑒ñ𝑜 𝑃𝐹𝑅: 𝑥𝐴
𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 𝑑𝑥𝐴
= න →1
𝐹𝐴𝑜 −𝜈𝐴
𝑥𝐴𝑜
𝐹𝐵 73350 𝑚𝑜𝑙/ℎ
→ 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝐹𝐴0 : 𝐹𝐵 = 𝐹𝐴0 𝑥𝐴 → 𝐹𝐴0 = = →2
𝑥𝐴 𝑥𝐴
𝐹𝐵 𝑥𝐴 4.65 9.3
𝑥 𝑑𝑥𝐴
𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 = 𝐴 න → 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑥𝐴 : 𝐶𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴0 1 − 𝑥𝐴 ∴ 𝑥𝐴 = 0.5
𝐶𝐴0 𝐾 𝑥
0 1 1 − 𝑥𝐴 − 𝐴
𝐾𝐸𝑞
→ 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝐾1 𝑦 𝐾𝐸𝑞 :
𝐹𝐴0
9 𝐹𝐴0 𝑥𝐴 ∆𝐻𝑅 1 𝐹𝐴0 𝑥𝐴 ∆𝐻𝑅
𝐹𝐴0 𝐶𝑝𝐴 𝑇0 − 𝑇 + 𝐹𝐼𝑛0 𝐶𝑝𝐼𝑛 𝑇0 − 𝑇 = 𝐹𝐴0 𝑇0 − 𝑇 𝐶𝑝𝐴 + 𝐶𝑝𝐼𝑛 =
𝑎 9 𝑎
1 𝑥𝐴 ∆𝐻𝑅
𝑇0 − 𝑇 𝐶𝑝𝐴 + 𝐶𝑝𝐼𝑛 = →5; 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟 ∆𝐻𝑅 :
9 𝑎
𝑇 0
𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑟 ∆𝐻𝑅 = ∆𝐻𝑅@𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓 + න ∆𝐶𝑃 𝑑𝑇; ∆𝐶𝑝 = 𝐶𝑝𝐴 + −1 𝐶𝑝𝐴 = 0 ∴ ∆𝐻𝑅 = ∆𝐻𝑅@𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓 ← 𝑆𝑢𝑠𝑡. 𝑦 𝑒𝑐𝐸𝑛 5:
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓
1 −6900𝑥𝐴
330 − 𝑇 141 + ∗ 161 = → 330 − 𝑇 158.89 = −6900𝑥𝐴
9 1
330 − 𝑇 158.89 = −6900𝑥𝐴 → 330 − 𝑇 = −43.4263𝑥𝐴 → −𝑇 = −43.4263𝑥𝐴 − 330
𝑥𝐴 =0.5
𝑑𝑥𝐴
𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 = 15774.1935 𝐿/ℎ න 1 1
7906 360−43.4263𝑥 +330 𝑥𝐴
0 31.1 ∗ 𝑒 𝐴 1 − 𝑥𝐴 − 1 1
−830 333−43.4263𝑥 +330
3.03 ∗𝑒 𝐴
∴ 𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 = 1407.32 𝐿
𝐶4 𝐻8 (𝑔) → 𝐶4 𝐻6 (𝑔) + 𝐻2(𝑔)
𝑃𝑇0 = 2 𝑎𝑡𝑚 𝐴(𝑔) → 𝑅(𝑔) + 𝑆(𝑔) 𝑄𝑠𝑢𝑚 ó 𝑄𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 ≠ 0
𝑦𝐴0 = 0.9
𝑇0 = 923𝐾 𝑇 = 𝑇0 = 923𝐾
→ 𝑎) 𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 =?
𝐶𝐴0 =? (𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑢𝑒𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑎. )
𝑚𝑜𝑙 1 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1
𝑆𝑖: −𝜈𝐴 = 𝐾𝑃𝐴 = ∙ ;𝐾 = ∙ ; 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑃𝐴 , 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐶𝐴 :
𝐿 ℎ 𝐿 ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝑃𝐴 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑎𝑡𝑚 𝐿
→ 𝐴ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑒𝑦 𝑑𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑡: 𝐶𝐴 = → 𝑃𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴 𝑅𝑇 = 0.0161 0.08205 923𝐾 = 1.219 𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝑅𝑇 𝐿 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐾
−𝐸𝑎 −𝐸𝑎
ln 𝑅𝑇 −𝐸𝑎
𝑙𝑛 𝐾 = ln 𝐴 + 𝑙𝑛𝑒 𝑅𝑇 → ln 𝐾 = ln 𝐴 +𝑒 → ln 𝐾 = ln 𝐴 +
𝑅𝑇
−𝐸𝑎 1
ln 𝐾 = + ln 𝐴 → 𝐷𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐𝑖ó𝑛 𝑒𝑛 𝐸𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑙:
𝑅 𝑇
−𝐸𝑎 −𝐸𝑎
𝑚= = −30109 = ∴ 𝐸𝑎 = 59826.6 𝑐𝑎𝑙/𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑦 = ±𝑚 𝑥 ±𝑏 𝑅 𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙
1.987 𝐾
𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑏 = 35.049 = ln 𝐴 → 𝑒 35.049 = 𝐴 = 1.6656 × 1015
𝐿 ∙ ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝑐𝑎𝑙
−59826.6𝑚𝑜𝑙
−𝐸𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙
1.987𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐾 ) 923 𝐾
𝑁𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝐾@923𝐾 : 𝐾1 = 𝑅𝑇
𝐴𝑒 @923𝐾 = 1.6656 × 1015 𝑒 = 11.338
𝐿 ∙ ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚 𝐿 ∙ ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚
→ 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑛 𝐸𝑐. 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑒ñ𝑜:
𝑥𝐴 =0.2
9900.1 𝑚𝑜𝑙/ℎ
𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 = න 𝑑𝑥𝐴 = 143.2 𝐿
𝑚𝑜𝑙
1.219 𝑎𝑡𝑚 ∗ 11.338 0
𝐿 ∙ ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝐶4 𝐻8 (𝑔) → 𝐶4 𝐻6 (𝑔) + 𝐻2(𝑔)
𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑏):
𝑃𝑇0 = 2 𝑎𝑡𝑚 𝐴(𝑔) → 𝑅(𝑔) + 𝑆(𝑔) 𝑄𝑝 = 0
𝑦𝐴0 = 0.9
𝑇0 = 923𝐾 𝑇 =?
→ 𝑎) 𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 =?
𝐶𝐴0 = 0.02376 𝑚𝑜𝑙/𝐿
𝑛 𝑇0
𝐹𝐴0 𝑥𝐴 ∆𝐻𝑅
𝐹𝑖0 න 𝐶𝑝𝑖 𝑑𝑡 − =0→𝐵
𝑎
𝑖=1 𝑇
0.1111𝐹𝐴0
𝐹𝐴0 𝑥𝐴 ∆𝐻𝑅
𝐹𝐴0 𝐶𝑝𝐴 𝑇0 − 𝑇 + 𝐹𝐼𝑛.0 𝐶𝑝𝐼𝑛 𝑇0 − 𝑇 =
𝑎
𝐶𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑑
𝐶𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑑 = 𝑦𝐴0 𝐶𝑝𝐴 + 0.1111𝐶𝑝𝐼𝑛. → = [𝐶𝑝𝐴 + 0.1111𝐶𝑝𝐼𝑛. ] → 𝐶
𝑦𝐴0
→ 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑙 𝐶𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑑 , ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠:
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔 𝐾𝐽 𝐾𝑔 𝐾𝐽
𝑃𝑚𝑚 = 0.9 ∗ 56.11 + 0.1 ∗ 18 = 52.3 𝐶𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑑 = 2.1 52.3 = 109.83
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐾𝑔 𝐾 𝐾𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐾𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐾
𝐾𝐽
109.83
→ 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑛 𝐴´:
923 − 𝑇 𝐾𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐾 = 0.2 1.1 × 105 𝐽 1𝐾𝐽 1000 𝑚𝑜𝑙
0.9 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1000 𝐽 1 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙
∴ 𝑇 = 742.72𝐾
𝑃𝐴 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑎𝑡𝑚 𝐿
→ 𝐴ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑒𝑦 𝑑𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑡: 𝐶𝐴 = → 𝑃𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴 𝑅𝑇 = 0.02 0.08205 742.2 𝐾 = 1.218 𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝑅𝑇 𝐿 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐾
𝑥𝐴
→ 𝑂𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑦𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑥𝐴
𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑝𝑐𝑖ó𝑛 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝐾 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑇𝑒𝑚𝑝. : 𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 = 𝐹𝐴0 න
𝐾@742.72𝐾 𝑃𝐴@742.72𝐾
0
−𝐸𝑎
→ 𝐷𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝐸𝑐. 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑟𝑟ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑢𝑠: 𝐾= 𝐴𝑒 𝑅𝑇
−𝐸𝑎
𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖ó𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟: 𝑙𝑛 𝐾 = 𝑙𝑛 𝐴 ∙ 𝑒 𝑅𝑇
−𝐸𝑎 −𝐸𝑎
ln 𝑅𝑇 −𝐸𝑎
𝑙𝑛 𝐾 = ln 𝐴 + 𝑙𝑛𝑒 𝑅𝑇 → ln 𝐾 = ln 𝐴 +𝑒 → ln 𝐾 = ln 𝐴 +
𝑅𝑇
−𝐸𝑎 1
ln 𝐾 = + ln 𝐴 → 𝐷𝑒 𝑙𝑎 𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐𝑖ó𝑛 𝑒𝑛 𝐸𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑙:
𝑅 𝑇
−𝐸𝑎 𝐸𝑎
𝑚= = −30109 = ∴ 𝐸𝑎 = 59826.6 𝑐𝑎𝑙/𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑦 = ±𝑚 𝑥 ±𝑏 𝑅 𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙
1.987 𝐾
𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑏 = 35.049 = ln 𝐴 → 𝑒 35.049 = 𝐴 = 1.6656 × 1015
𝐿 ∙ ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝑐𝑎𝑙
−59826.6𝑚𝑜𝑙
−𝐸𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙
1.987𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐾) 742.72 𝐾
𝐾2 = 𝐴𝑒 𝑅𝑇@742.72𝐾 = 1.6656 × 1015 𝑒 = 0.004128
𝐿 ∙ ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚 𝐿 ∙ ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚
→ 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑛 𝐸𝑐. 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑒ñ𝑜:
𝑥𝐴 =0.2
9900.1 𝑚𝑜𝑙/ℎ
𝑉𝑃𝐹𝑅 = න 𝑑𝑥𝐴 = 393806.2 𝐿
𝑚𝑜𝑙
1.218 𝑎𝑡𝑚 ∗ 0.004128 0
𝐿 ∙ ℎ ∙ 𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝑚3 𝐴(𝑙) + 𝐵(𝑙) → 𝑅(𝑙)
𝜐0 = 1.10
𝐾𝑠
𝑇0 = 70°𝐶
𝑄ሶ 1.𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 =
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 1000 𝑚𝑜𝑙 1𝑚3
𝐶𝐵0 = 5.6
𝑚3 1 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 1000 𝐿
𝑇1 = 106°𝐶
𝑥𝐵1 =?
𝑄ሶ 2.𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 =
𝑉𝐶𝑆𝑇𝑅.1 = 0.8𝑚3
1
𝑘@106°𝐶 = 0.93
𝐾𝑠
−𝜈𝐵 = 𝐾𝐶𝐵 1
𝑘@117°𝐶 = 2.79 𝑥𝐵2 = 0.8
𝐾𝑠
𝑉𝐶𝑆𝑇𝑅.2 = 0.8𝑚3 𝑇2 = 117°𝐶
𝐾𝐽
∆𝐻𝑅@70°𝐶 = −69
𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝐽
𝐶𝑝𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑛. = 3.47
𝑐𝑚3 𝐾
→ 𝐸𝑙 𝐵𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔í𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑏á𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒:
𝑛 𝑇0
𝐹𝐵0 𝑥𝐵 ∆𝐻𝑅
𝐹𝑖0 න 𝐶𝑝𝑖 𝑑𝑇 − + 𝑄ሶ = 0 → 4
𝑏
𝑖=1 𝑇
→ 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑥𝐵1 : → 𝐸𝑐. 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑒ñ𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟: → 𝐸𝑐. 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑒ñ𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟:
1
(𝑥𝐵1 ) 2.79 (1 − 0.8)
1= 𝐾𝑠 , 𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒: 𝑥𝐵1 = 0.4
1
0.93 1 − 𝑥𝐵1 (0.8 − 𝑥𝐵1 )
𝐾𝑠
𝜐0 𝐶𝐵0
→ 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖ó𝑛 𝐴: 𝐹𝐵0 𝐶𝑝𝐵 𝑇0 − 𝑇 − 𝑥𝐵1 ∆𝐻𝑅 = −𝑄1ሶ → 𝐴
1
𝐶𝐵0
𝐽 1 𝐾𝐽 𝐾𝐽
→ −𝑄ሶ 1 = 3.26043 × 107 ∴ 𝑄1ሶ = −32604.32 𝐶𝐴𝐿𝑂𝑅 𝐴 𝑅𝐸𝑇𝐼𝑅𝐴𝑅 𝐸𝑁 𝐸𝐿 𝑃𝑅𝐼𝑀𝐸𝑅 𝑅𝐸𝐴𝐶𝑇𝑂𝑅.
𝐾𝑠 1000 𝐽 𝐾𝑆
→ 𝑃𝑢𝑒𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑛 𝐵𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔í𝑎 𝑦 𝑙𝑜𝑠 2 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑐ó𝑚𝑜 𝑢𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑜
→ 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑠: ሶ
𝐹𝐵0 𝐶𝑝𝐵 𝑇0 − 𝑇2 − 𝑥𝐵2 ∆𝐻𝑅 = −𝑄𝐺𝐿𝑂𝐵𝐴𝐿 →𝐷
→ 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖ó𝑛 𝐷:
𝐽 1 𝐾𝐽 𝐾𝐽
ሶ
→ −𝑄𝐺𝐿𝑂𝐵𝐴𝐿 = 3.26043 × 107 ሶ
∴ 𝑄𝐺𝐿𝑂𝐵𝐴𝐿 = −160633.4305
𝐾𝑠 1000 𝐽 𝐾𝑠
𝐾𝐽
→ 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎: 𝑄ሶ 𝐺𝐿𝑂𝐵𝐴𝐿 = 𝑄ሶ 1 + 𝑄ሶ 2 𝑄ሶ 2 = −128029
𝐾𝑠