Critiquing Literature Review in Qualitative Research

Crafting a literature review is an essential component of any qualitative research endeavor. However,
the process of creating a comprehensive and insightful literature review can often prove to be a
challenging task. The meticulous examination, analysis, and synthesis of existing literature require not
only time and effort but also a deep understanding of the subject matter and critical thinking skills.

One of the primary difficulties encountered in writing a literature review for qualitative research lies
in the extensive scope of available literature. Navigating through a myriad of scholarly articles,
books, and other academic sources can be overwhelming, particularly when attempting to identify
relevant studies that contribute meaningfully to the research topic. Moreover, synthesizing diverse
perspectives and findings from various sources while maintaining coherence and clarity further
complicates the process.

Additionally, ensuring the credibility and validity of the sources included in the literature review
poses another significant challenge. Evaluating the quality of research methodologies, assessing the
rigor of data collection and analysis techniques, and discerning potential biases require a discerning
eye and a thorough understanding of research principles.

Furthermore, striking a balance between providing a comprehensive overview of existing literature

and offering insightful critique and analysis is often a delicate endeavor. Critiquing the strengths and
limitations of previous studies while highlighting gaps in knowledge and suggesting avenues for
future research demands both analytical prowess and scholarly finesse.

Given the complexities involved in crafting a literature review for qualitative research, it is not
surprising that many researchers seek assistance in this task. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a reliable
solution for individuals grappling with the intricacies of literature review writing. Our team of
experienced academic writers specializes in conducting thorough literature reviews, employing
critical analysis, and synthesizing information effectively.

By entrusting your literature review needs to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest assured that your
work will be handled with professionalism and expertise. Our writers are adept at navigating the vast
landscape of scholarly literature, identifying pertinent sources, and crafting coherent and insightful
reviews tailored to your research objectives.

Whether you are embarking on a new research project or seeking to strengthen the literature review
component of your existing work, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your trusted partner in academic
excellence. Place your order today and experience the difference our expert assistance can make in
your qualitative research endeavors.
Cite this Article in your Essay (APA Style) Drew, C. (May 15, 2023). 15 Literature Review
Examples. Doing qualitative research is not easy and may require a complete rethink of how research
is conducted, particularly for researchers who are more familiar with quantitative approaches. Again,
the value of such research to the discipline of language acquisition is relative to the approaches
within the approach of using metacognitive processing data and categorizing according to cognitive
frameworks. Similar to the characteristics of a case study the approach has a specific idea of what it
wants to find out and from whom. The goal is to more comprehensively understand a particular
phenomenon. The context of survey hoped to deliver a quantifiable statistical sample of the staff
demographic within certain corporate health care facilities that could be dissected. This review
attempts to present a series of evaluative criteria for qualitative researchers, arguing that their choice
of criteria needs to be compatible with the unique nature of the research in question (its
methodology, aims, and assumptions). By the nature of the study the researcher knows what she will
be looking for; through the use of an. Organizational programs that emphasize research and evidence-
based practice have been effectively curtailed due to increasing costs and the staffing difficulties of
the last two decades within certain elements of the health care system as a whole. The team seeks to
align the review question and the requirements of the knowledge user with available time and
resources. The next area to analyze in critiquing the problem. Critique of Quantitative and
Qualitative Research Articles assignment examples 0-6 points Research Design 20 points Fully
compares and contrasts the research design for each article. Guidance for authoring a rapid QES is
scattered and requires compilation and summary. Examples Of Qualitative Paper Critique This does
not necessarily mean however that a research article needs to be labeled as being one type of
research or another, but rather to take it as what it is; within the context of the investigation and
considering the limitations in which it was carried out, we can still grasp an idea of its validity and
usefulness. It is the main theme in such works of a postmodern Chinese literature. It can be used in
pharmacy practice research to explore how patients feel about their health and their treatment.
Theory building; 4 The case study contains a bias toward verification; and 5 It is often. It also offers
some prospects and recommendations to improve the quality of qualitative research. If we read a
little more deeply, we can ask ourselves how the participant might have come to feel that the doctor
assumed he or she was aware of the diagnosis or indeed that they had only just been told the
diagnosis. Further reading about “doing” qualitative research can be found at the end of this paper.
Implications for real life (e.g., the treatment of people with chronic mental health problems) should
also be given. Can art therapy reduce death anxiety and burnout in end-of-life care workers. This
background knowledge for the transcriber is especially important in research in which people are
using jargon or medical terms (as in pharmacy practice). It can also be helpful in searching complex
data sets. Let's look at an extract from the article on Detecting contract cheating: examining the role
of assessment type. There remains an ongoing debate in relation to what an appropriate sample size
should be for a qualitative study. For most readers, the synthesis of data presented by the researcher
is of crucial significance—this is usually where “the story” of the participants can be distilled,
summarized, and told in a manner that is both respectful to those participants and meaningful to
readers. Beltran PV, Nos P, Bastida G, Beltran, B, Arguello L, Aguas M, Rubin A, Pertejo V, Sala T.
However, researchers and reviewers need to keep in mind that it is inappropriate to utilize the same
approaches and conducts among all qualitative research. Improving Quality: Strategies Another
critical question is “How can the qualitative researchers ensure that the abovementioned quality
criteria can be met?” Lincoln and Guba ( 1986 ) delineated several strategies to intensify each criteria
of trustworthiness.
Keywords used in the data search included: food, naturalness, natural content, and natural
ingredients. Presentation Outline: What “Literature Review” is and its importance. Give a thorough
overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the current state
of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what is lacking in
the literature. As an exercise, you may wish to code and theme the sample excerpt in Appendix 1 and
tell the participant’s story in your own way. Notably, the combining of the literature review with the
introduction makes it hard to distinguish between the empirical studies which form a historical
context for thinking about the issues involved and the current literature that has led the researcher to
formulate the specific research questions. Limitations and Qualitative Application A PAPER
SUBMITTED by::Author’s NoteAbstract:Nurses’ Perceptions of Research Utilization in a Corporate
Health Care System proposes that the unique circumstances within todays nursing community
requires a revaluation of research practices across the entire profession. After that, some of the quality
checklists (as tools to evaluate quality) are discussed in Sect. However, McCloskey’s research lacks
sufficient depth to offer a specific formulaic approach to rectifying the research-practice gap as
detailed in the wide panorama of the entire nursing profession.II. Research Goal:McCloskey sets out
with a very simple tenant, conduct a research survey designed to explore selected characteristics of
nurses based upon educational level, years of experience, and hospital position. Evaluate the quality
and reliability of the references you find - our page on evaluating information outlines what you
need to consider when evaluating the books, journal articles, news and websites you find to ensure
they are suitable for use in your literature review. Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A
Comprehensive Review. There is an urgent need to refurbish and augment critical assessment of
some well-known and widely accepted tools (including checklists such as COREQ, SRQR) to
interrogate their applicability on different aspects (along with their epistemological ramifications).
Qualitative research does not usually impose structures on the data until the implications of the data
begin to. The significance of this study as implied by the researcher in her concluding statements lies
in its contribution to knowledge the dimensions of substance abuse and on acupuncture as a
treatment modality in order to aid health care providers in incorporating alternative approaches to
their practices. Qualitative researchers tend to report “findings” rather than “results”, as the latter
term typically implies that the data have come from a quantitative source. This simply mean that the
researchers were not gaining any new information at subsequent interviews, so they stopped data
collection. Theoretical and conceptual frameworks Most authors use the terms theoretical and
conceptual frameworks interchangeably. Please refer to the section on synthesising sources into your
writing here for tips on how to synthesise sources effectively. Our time is limited, so we generally do
not reply to unsolicited recommendations from individuals not affiliated with AdventHealth
University or notify them regarding whether or not we have linked to suggested content. The aim of
the whole process from data collection to presentation is to tell the participants’ stories using
exemplars from their own narratives, thus grounding the research findings in the participants’ lived
experiences. Planning out the way that findings are to be presented is helpful. Students should
always cross-check any information on this site with their course teacher. The introduction cites
numerous references of previous research describing general and specific factors affecting listener
difficulties in a second language. Further reading around the subject will be essential to truly
understand this method of accessing peoples’ thoughts and feelings to enable researchers to tell
participants’ stories. Appendix 1.?Excerpt from a sample transcript The participant (age late 50s) had
suffered from a chronic mental health illness for 30 years. As we suggested in our earlier article, 1 an
important point about qualitative research is that there is no attempt to generalize the findings to a
wider population. Publications focusing on evaluation criteria for good qualitative research were
included, whereas those works which delivered theoretical concepts on qualitative research were
excluded. The difference between theoretical and methodological literature might be slim. The
studies reviewed were a qualitative study and a quantitative study. A combination of such checklists
might be appropriate for novice researchers. They are a normal part of learning and can help you to
improve. One way of establishing the “credibility” of the coding is to ask another researcher to code
the same transcript and then to discuss any similarities and differences in the 2 resulting sets of
codes.
Methodology Qualitative research encompasses a variety of methods and designs. Critiquing
Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies Order Description Week 6 Assignment
Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may
decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 (
table 2, item R6). Farrell B, Pottie K, Woodend K, Yao V, Dolovich L, Kennie N, et al. In general,
the guiding principle pertaining to generalizability speaks about inducing and comprehending
knowledge to synthesize interpretive components of an underlying context. At the end of this
excerpt, the participant just trails off, recalling that no-one showed any interest, which makes for
very moving reading. After presenting the key themes, the authors recommend that practitioners
need to approach healthcare communication in a more structured way, such as by ensuring there is a
clear understanding of who is in charge of ensuring effective communication in clinical settings.
Video downloaded Assessment questions Mary Cazzell, PhD, RN, director of nursing research and
evidence-based practice at Cook Children's Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas, discusses ways to
critique quantitative and qualitative research articles used for literature reviews and explains why
this skill is important in evidence-based practice. And so, such a vivid conceptual framework and
design usually tends to be associated with quantitative research. International journal of clinical
practice, 69 (11), 1257-1267. For example, the title of the research report by Thurston and others, 7
“Discordant indigenous and provider frames explain challenges in improving access to arthritis care:
a qualitative study using constructivist grounded theory,” indicates at least 2 theoretical standpoints.
Our samples can provide you with a huge amount of guidance and ideas as to what areas you need to
cover within your review and how you should structure and format your critique. The pretense of the
survey was to establish a fair baseline of exactly what resources were available, what were the
prevailing attitudes towards research, and how that research is translated into clinical practice.
Researchers have reflected various concerns and proposed several recommendations for editors and
reviewers on conducting reviews of critical qualitative research (Levitt et al., 2021; McGinley et al.,
2021 ). Following are some prospects and a few recommendations put forward towards the
maturation of qualitative research and its quality evaluation: In general, most of the manuscript and
grant reviewers are not qualitative experts. In the previous paper, 1 we outlined 3 commonly used
methodologies: ethnography 2, grounded theory 3, and phenomenology. 4 Briefly, ethnography
involves researchers using direct observation to study participants in their “real life” environment,
sometimes over extended periods. The protocol should always be publicly available ( table 2, item
R2). 24 25 Formal registration may require that the team has not commenced data extraction but
should be considered if it does not compromise the rQES timeframe. The difference between
theoretical and methodological literature might be slim. According to firsthand accounts from the
homeless, many of these workers are largely motivated by their paychecks and not the people they
are serving. Our Qualitative Research Critique Services Are Covered by Our Guarantees We know
the difficulties associated with providing qualitative research critique which is why you are going to
have the opportunity to work with the best-qualified experts in the field of your research. Reading
between the Lines During the process outlined above, the researcher can begin to get a feel for the
participant’s experience of the phenomenon in question and can start to think about things that could
be pursued in subsequent interviews or focus groups (if appropriate). Select Process, Cycle,
Hierarchy, or Relationship to see templates. Work shop of your rough draft Prep Assignment for
Next Class Peer Critique. Some of these checklists are listed below: The most commonly used
framework is Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) (Tong et al., 2007
). This framework is recommended by some journals to be followed by the authors during article
submission. In this article, we review some principles of the collection, analysis, and management of
qualitative data to help pharmacists interested in doing research in their practice to continue their
learning in this area. Involving your transcriber in this way makes the work both easier and more
rewarding, as he or she will feel part of the team. Qualitative Critique of Sampling Methodology
Based upon information provided this study was appropriate conducted as a purposeful sampling
but, this study 917 Words 4 Pages In order to carry out my research, there were two feasible
arguments to using qualitative research and quantitative methods. The length of the summary for
each work depends on the purpose of each citation. Later in the text, the participant says “nobody
asked me any questions about my life” (line 19). Further Reading Examples of qualitative research in
pharmacy practice. Some researchers have argued that it may be appropriate to think of Qualitative.
The different philosophical underpinnings of the various qualitative research methods generate
discrete ways of reasoning and distinct terminology; however, there are also many similarities within
these methods. The best way to communicate to the outside world about your culture is through
literature. The next area to analyze in critiquing the problem. However, researchers and reviewers
need to keep in mind that it is inappropriate to utilize the same approaches and conducts among all
qualitative research. The findings point toward a significant disparity between each layer within the
staff demographic. Conclusions, Future Directions, and Outlook This work presents a broad review
of the criteria for good qualitative research. Here are a few tips that you can glean out of reading
samples. More description of research that suggests this approach could have been advantageous. At
its core, a concept map consists of nodes, which represent individual concepts or ideas, and links,
which depict the relationships between these concepts. Again, the value of such research to the
discipline of language acquisition is relative to the approaches within the approach of using
metacognitive processing data and categorizing according to cognitive frameworks. Noble and
Smith 11 explain that validity is the integrity of data methods applied and that findings should
accurately reflect the data. The team seeks to align the review question and the requirements of the
knowledge user with available time and resources. You can download it and save it as a Word
document once you have finished. Journal of experimental criminology, 10, 487-513. A systematic
approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Qualitative
Research: Interpretive Paradigms All qualitative researchers follow highly abstract principles which
bring together beliefs about ontology, epistemology, and methodology. An rQES team, in particular,
cannot afford any extra time or resource requirements that might arise from either a
misunderstanding of the review question, an unclear picture of user requirements or an inappropriate
choice of methods. In general, qualitative research tends to come from a very different paradigmatic
stance and intrinsically demands distinctive and out-of-the-ordinary criteria for evaluating good
research and varieties of research contributions that can be made. However the data are being
collected, a primary responsibility of the researcher is to safeguard participants and their data. BMJ
disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. HOW THIS
STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY This paper offers guidance for
researchers when conducting a rapid QES and informs commissioners of research and policy-makers
what to expect when commissioning such a review. Tracy argues that high-quality qualitative work
should formulate criteria focusing on the worthiness, relevance, timeliness, significance, morality, and
practicality of the research topic, and the ethical stance of the research itself. HE LIVED IN AN
APARTMENT IN NYC DURING THE LATE 1940s AND 1950s. Qualitative systematic reviews:
their importance for our understanding A qualitative systematic review brings together research on a
topic, systematically searching for research evidence from primary qualitative studies and drawing
the findings together. Unit 6: Critiquing Qualitative and Quantitative Research Kaplan University
July 16, 2013 Unit 6 Critiquing Qualitative and Quantitative Research The research conducted by
Foster-Fitzpatrick, Ortiz, Sibilano, Marcantonio and Braun 1999 is a quantitative study of the
significance of crossing the legs while blood pressure is being measured. Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link
to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. CRITIQUE ON A
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of
clinical Practice. The deliberate use of constructs to acquire and analyze data for immediate
interpretation for example tells us the researcher not only knows what information she needs but
almost hypothesizes as to what the outcomes will look like. Qualitative research is used to gain
insights into people’s feelings and thoughts, which may provide the basis for a future stand-alone
qualitative study or may help researchers to map out survey instruments for use in a quantitative
study. This would potentially help to avoid the enforcement of one's own set of quality criteria on the
work carried out by others.
Qualitative research concentrates on understanding phenomena and may focus on meanings,
perceptions, concepts, thoughts, experiences or feelings. 2 Qualitative research examines how or why
a phenomenon occurs. If a single reviewer undertakes full-text screening, 8 the team should identify
likely risks to trustworthiness of findings and focus quality control procedures (eg, use of additional
reviewers and percentages for double screening) on specific threats 14 ( table 2, item R13). The
CQIMG endorses three types of synthesis; thematic synthesis, framework synthesis and meta-
ethnography ( box 1 ). 43 44 Rapid QES favour descriptive thematic synthesis 45 or framework
synthesis, 46 47 except when theory generation (meta-ethnography 48 49 or analytical thematic
synthesis) is a priority ( table 2, item R17). CONCLUSIONS Qualitative research can help
researchers to access the thoughts and feelings of research participants, which can enable
development of an understanding of the meaning that people ascribe to their experiences. Farrell B,
Pottie K, Woodend K, Yao V, Dolovich L, Kennie N, et al. Faculty of Informatics, Technische
Universitat Wien, 1040, Vienna, Austria Drishti Yadav You can also search for this author in PubMed
Google Scholar Corresponding author Correspondence to Drishti Yadav. Video downloaded
Assessment questions Mary Cazzell, PhD, RN, director of nursing research and evidence-based
practice at Cook Children's Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas, discusses ways to critique
quantitative and qualitative research articles used for literature reviews and explains why this skill is
important in evidence-based practice. Use of templates and frameworks in study selection and data
extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance procedures targeting areas of likely weakness.
The goal is to more comprehensively understand a particular phenomenon. Nurses also have a
professional responsibility to maintain up-to-date practice. 1 This paper provides a guide on how to
critically appraise a qualitative research paper. Underneath each theme will be the codes, examples
from the transcripts, and the researcher’s own interpretation of what the themes mean. And why is a
systematic review considered to be so good. As an exercise, you may wish to code and theme the
sample excerpt in Appendix 1 and tell the participant’s story in your own way. Interpretation of Data
Interpretation of the data will depend on the theoretical standpoint taken by researchers. With my
undergraduate research students (who tend to conduct small-scale qualitative studies ), I encourage
them to conduct a narrative literature review whereby they can identify key themes in the literature.
Postmodern urban literature in China explores the kinds of themes which reflect distortion and
decline of the human life in the society characterized by a mechanical lifestyle and high technology.
At the end of this excerpt, the participant just trails off, recalling that no-one showed any interest,
which makes for very moving reading. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any
reliance placed on the content. The length of the summary for each work depends on the purpose of
each citation. HE LIVED IN AN APARTMENT IN NYC DURING THE LATE 1940s AND 1950s.
They involve gathering, analyzing, and evaluating existing knowledge about a topic in order to find
gaps in the literature where future studies will be needed. Hammersley ( 2007 ) also suggests that
guiding principles for qualitative research are advantageous, but methodological pluralism should not
be simply acknowledged for all qualitative approaches. All authors (AB, IS, JN, CH, FC) have given
final approval of the version to be published. The Detailed Evaluation of Coursework is a course-by-
course evaluation of work completed at foreign institutions and resembles a US transcript. Selection
of checklist Numerous scales and checklists exist for assessing the quality of qualitative studies.
Bolin TD, Wong S, Ult GC, Crouch R, Engelman JL and Riordan SM. Literature reviews
Introduction Conducting your search Store and organise the literature Evaluate the information you
have found Critique the literature. Some researchers provide a diagram of how they approached data
analysis to demonstrate the rigour applied ( figure 1 ). Researchers and practitioners new to
qualitative research should seek advice from an experienced qualitative researcher before embarking
on their project. Tracy argues that high-quality qualitative work should formulate criteria focusing on
the worthiness, relevance, timeliness, significance, morality, and practicality of the research topic, and
the ethical stance of the research itself.