1.

1 AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students Instructors

WM AD WM AD

1. 4.37 ME 4.08 MrE 4.23 ME 3

2. 4.16 MrE 4.58 ME 4.37 ME 2

3. 4.07 MrE 4.75 ME 4.41 ME 1

4. 3.96 MrE 3.25 LE 3.61 MrE 4

5. 3.99 MrE 3.00 LE 3.50 MrE 5

OWM 4.11 MrE 3.93 MrE 4.02 LE

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the class schedule.

The table also revelas that "subject instructors have conflict in their class schedule"
ranked one out five with an average weighted mean of 4.41 that simply implies the said
indicator is most effective. "The class schedule is strictly followed" is in the last rank
after having an average weighted mean of 3.50 that means the mentioned indicator is
more effective. In addition, the Overall weighted mean of 4.02 reveals that the indicators
under "Class Schedule" is more effective as a whole.

1.2 AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students Instructors

WM AD WM AD

1. 3.99 MrE 4.081 MrE 4.04 MrE 4

2. 4.14 MrE 4.58 ME 4.36 ME 1

3. 3.94 MrE 3.92 MrE 3.93 MrE 5

 4. 4.09 MrE 4.08 MrE 4.09 MrE 2

5. 4.06 MrE 4.083 MrE 4.07 MrE 3

OWM 4.04 MrE 4.15 MrE 4.10 MrE

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the "Instructional Methods and Strategies"

The table also shows that "Teacher use interactive teaching-learning method" is in the
first rank with an average weighted mean of 4.36 that simply implies the said indicator is
most effective. "Teachers use group dynamics" is in the last rank after having an
average weighted mean of 3.50 that means the mentioned indicator is more effective.
Furthermore, the Overall weighted mean of 4.10 reveals that the indicators covered by
"Instructional Methods and Strategies" is more effective.

1.3 AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students Instructors

WM AD WM AD

1. 4.09 MrE 3.50 MrE 3.80 MrE 4

2. 3.03 LE 3.42 MrE 3.23 MrE 5

3. 3.91 MrE 4.00 MrE 4.00 MrE 3

4. 3.85 MrE 4.75 ME 4.30 ME 1

5. 3.94 MrE 4.42 ME 4.18 MrE 2

OWM 3.76 MrE 4.02 MrE 3.90 MrE

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the learning materials.
The table also reveals that "Teachers use journals and magazines as springboard of the
lesson" is in the first rank after having an average weighted mean of 4.30 that simply
means the said indicator is most effective. "Tecahers modules" is last in the rank after
having an average weighted mean of 3.50 that implicates the said indicator is more
effective. Moreover, the Overall weighted mean of 3.90 reveals that the indicators under
"Learning Materials" is more effective.

1.4 Instructors AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students

WM AD WM AD

1. 3.94 MrE 3.75 MrE 3.85 MrE 3

2. 3.91 MrE 4.08 MrE 4.00 MrE 1

3. 3.66 MrE 3.58 MrE 3.62 MrE 5

4. 3.55 MrE 4.00 MrE 3.78 MrE 4

5. 3.76 MrE 4.17 MrE 3.97 MrE 2

OWM 3.76 MrE 3.92 MrE 3.84 MrE

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the room assignments.

The table also shows that "rooms are properly lighted" is in the first rank with an
average weighted mean of 4.00 that simply implies the said indicator is most effective.
"rooms have enough chairs" is in the last rank after having an average weighted mean
of 3.62 that means the mentioned indicator is more effective. In addition, the Overall
weighted mean of 3.84 reveals that the indicators under "room assignments" is more
effective as a whole.
 2.1 Instructors AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students

WM AD WM AD

1. 4.08 MrS 4.58 MS 4.33 MS 2

2. 4.12 MrS 4.50 MS 4.31 MS 3

3. 4.03 MrS 4.75 MS 4.39 MS 1

4. 4.06 MrS 4.00 MrS 4.03 MrS 5

5. 4.14 MrS 4.33 MS 4.24 MS 4

OWM 4.09 MrS 4.43 MrS 4.26 MS

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the Academics.

The table also shows that "Teachers explain their lesson well" is in the first rank with an
average weighted mean of 4.39 that simply implies the said indicator is most sound.
"Teachers respect students opinion in class" is in the last rank after having an average
weighted mean of 4.03 that means the mentioned indicator is more sound. Generally,
the Overall weighted mean of 4.26 reveals that the indicators under "room assignments"
is morst sound..

2.2 Instructors AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students

WM AD WM AD

1. 3.54 MrS 3.50 MrS 3.52 MrS 3

2. 4.46 MS 3.92 MrS 4.19 MrS 1

 3. 3.45 MrS 3.08 LS 3.27 LS 4

4. 3.26 LS 2.92 LS 3.09 LS 5

5. 3.63 MrS 3.91 MrS 3.64 MrS 2

OWM 3.67 MrS 3.47 MrS 3.54 MrS

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the "Co-Curricular."

The table also shows that "Teachers acts as coaches to students" ranked one with an
average weighted mean of 4.19 that implicates the said indicator is more sound.
"Students are taught how to express or emote their feelings in some cultural art
activities" is in the last rank after consisting of an average weighted mean of 3.09 that
means the mentioned indicator is less sound. Moreover, the Overall weighted mean of
3.54 presented that the indicators under "Co-Curricular" is more sound as a whole.

2.3 AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students Instructors

WM AD WM AD

1. 3.84 MrS 2.83 LS 3.34 LS 3

2. 3.87 MrS 3.67 MrS 3.77 MrS 1

3. 3.83 MrS 2.67 LS 3.25 LS 4

4. 3.82 MrS 2.58 LS 3.20 LS 5

5. 3.92 MrS 3.00 LS 3.46 MrS 2

OWM 3.86 MrD 2.95 LS 3.40 MrS

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the Extracurricular.

The table also presented that "students are guided or trained in sports skills" is in the
first rank with an average weighted mean of 3.77 that implicates the said indicator is
more sound. "Students are very interested in schools activities" is in the last rank after
having an average weighted mean of 3.20 that simply implies the said indicator is less
sound. In addition, the Overall weighted mean of 3.40 shows that the indicators under
"Extracurricular" is more sound as a whole.

2.4 AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students Instructors

WM AD WM AD

1. 3.72 MrS 3.08 LS 3.40 MrS 3

2. 3.71 MrS 2.75 LS 3.23 LS 5

3. 4.04 MrS 2.76 LS 3.401 MrS 2

4. 3.88 MrS 3.00 LS 3.44 MrS 1

5. 3.70 MrS 2.92 LS 3.31 LS 4

OWM 3.81 MrS 2.90 LS 3.36 LS

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the community involvement.

The table also shows that "students and teachers volunteer in maintaining the clean and
green environment" is in the first rank with an average weighted mean of 3.44 that
simply implies the said indicator is more sound. "students and teachers are active in
environmental programs" is in the last rank after having an average weighted mean of
3.23 that means the mentioned indicator is less sound. Furthermore, the Overall
weighted mean of 3.36 reveals that the indicators under "community involvement" is
less sound as a whole.
 3.1 Instructors AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students

WM AD WM AD

1. 3.91 GrE 3.17 LE 3.54 GrE 5

2. 3.76 GrE 3.83 GrE 3.80 GrE 1

3. 3.71 GrE 3.58 GrE 3.65 GrE 2

4. 3.75 GrE 3.50 GrE 3.63 GrE 3

5. 3.99 GrE 3.18 LE 3.59 GrE 4

OWM 3.82 Grae 3.45 GrE 3.64 GrE

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the Attendance.

The table also shows that "rooms are properly lighted" is in the first rank with an
average weighted mean of 3.80 that simply implies the said indicator is greater extent.
"Students are present in the daily face to face meeting" is in the last rank after having
an average weighted mean of 3.54 that means the mentioned indicator is greater
extent. Generally, the Overall weighted mean of 3.64 reveals that the indicators under
"Attendance" is greater extent.

3.2 AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students Instructors

WM AD WM AD

1. 3.84 GrE 3.17 LE 3.51 GrE 1

2. 3.83 GrE 2.58 LE 3.21 LE 4

3. 3.82 GrE 3.16 LE 3.49 GrE 2

 4. 3.80 GrE 2.59 LsE 3.20 LE 5

5. 3.821 GrE 2.83 LE 3.33 LE 3

OWM 3m82 GrE 2.87 LE 3.35 LE

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the School Performance.

The table also shows that "Students are active in taking oral and written exam" is in the
first rank with an average weighted mean of 3.51 that simply implies the said indicator is
greater extent. "Students actively participate in individual or group activities" is in the
last rank after having an average weighted mean of 3.20 that means the mentioned
indicator is less extent. In addition, the Overall weighted mean of 3.35 reveals that the
indicators under "School Performance" is less extent.

3.3 AWM AD Rank

Indicators Students Instructors

WM AD WM AD

1. 3.84 GrE 3.17 LE 3.51 GrE 2

2. 3.69 GrE 3.25 LE 3.47 GrE 3

3. 3.83 GrE 3.92 GrE 3.88 GrE 1

4. 3.79 GrE 2.67 LE 2.23 LsE 5

5. 3.29 LE 2.33 LsE 2.81 LE 4

OWM 3.69 GrE 3.07 LE 3.38 LE

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the room Compliance of Academic Requirements.

The table also shows that " Students can freely approach their instructors as to
compliance of their academic requirements" is in the first rank with an average weighted
mean of 3.88 that simply implies the said indicator is greater extent. "Students are truly
focused in their academic requirements " is in the last rank after having an average
weighted mean of 2.23 that means the mentioned indicator is Least extent. Moreover,
the Overall weighted mean of 3.38 reveals that the indicators under "Compliance of
Academic Requirements" is Less extent.

4 Students Instructors AWM AD Rank

Indicators WM AD WM AD

1. 4.09 MrS 4.00 MrS 4.05 MrS 2

2. 4.141 MrS 4.17 MrS 4.16 MrS 1

3. 4.10 MrS 3.58 MrS 3.84 MrS 5

4. 3.88 MrS 4.01 MrS 3.95 MrS 4

5. 3.91 MrS 4.08 MrS 4.00 MrS 3

6. 4.06 MrS 3.33 LS 3.70 MrS 6

7. 3.92 MrS 3.17 LS 3.55 MrS 7

8. 4.14 MrS 2.83 LS 3.49 MrS 8

OWM 4.02 MrS 3.65 MrS 3.84 MrS

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the Problems Encountered.

The table also shows that "Lack of teachers" is in the first rank with an average
weighted mean of 4.16 that simply implies the said indicator is more serious. "Financial
needs in school" is in the last rank after having an average weighted mean of 3.49 that
means the mentioned indicator is more effective. Furthermore, the Overall weighted
mean of 3.84 shows that the indicators under "Problems encountered by the students in
the implementation in the limited face to face classes" is more serious as a whole.
 5 Students Instructors AWM AD Rank

Indicators WM AD WM AD

1. 4.17 MrR 4.25 MR 4.21 MR 1

2. 4.22 MR 2.83 LR 3.53 MrR 6

3. 4.26 MrR 3.50 MrR 3.88 MrR 4

4. 4.13 MrR 4.01 MrR 4.07 MrR 3

5. 4.172 MrR 3.25 LR 3.71 MrR 5

6. 4.08 MrR 2.831 LR 3.46 MrR 7

7. 4.21 MR 4.00 MrR 4.11 MrR 2

OWM 4.18 MrR 3.52 MrR 3.85 MrR

The table above shows the weighted mean, Average weighted mean, Adjectival
Description, respective rank and overall weighted mean of the responses of Students
and Instructors on the Measures recommended.

The table also shows that "Reinforcing the school health protocol" is in the first rank with
an average weighted mean of 4.21 that simply implies the said indicator is most
recommended. "Adequate instructional and learning materials in the library" is in the last
rank after having an average weighted mean of 3.46 that means the mentioned
indicator is more recommended. In addition, the Overall weighted mean of 3.85
presented that the indicators under "Measures recommended to improve the limited
face to face classes " is more recommended as a whole.
Sub-Problem 4. Is there a significant relationship between the variables of sub-problem number
one and sub-problem number three?

Sub-Problem 5. Is there a significant relationship between the variables of sub-problem number

two and those of number three?

Significant Relationship between "Effectiveness of the limited face to face classes in the college
of arts and sciences and teacher education, and Areas of developmental concern"

Significant Relationship between "the variables of sub-problem number two and those of
number three"

Pair of n Correlation Remark P-Value Interpretation

Variables Value

SOP1 168 -0.175 Very weak 0.0233 Statistically

and negative Significant
SOP3 correlation

The table above shows the pairs of variables, the total number of respondents
represented by n, correlation of the variables and its respective remarks, P-Value, and
the interpretation of the respective pair.

The table reveals that the first pair of variables "Effectiveness of the limited face to face
classes in the college of arts and sciences and teacher education, and Areas of
developmental concern" consisted of -0.175 correlation value that means the said pair
contained a very weak negative correlation. Furthermore, the table shows P-value of
0.0234 which is less than 0.05, this implies that the mentioned pair of variables is
statistically significant at P<0.05.

Pair of n Correlation Remark P-Value Interpretation

Variables Value

SOP2 and 168 0.349 Weak P<0.00001 Statistically

SOP3 positive Significant
correlation
The table also presented that the second pair of variables "Sound relationships between
the teachers and students conducting limited face to face classes and areas of
developmental concern" consisted of 0.349 correlation value that simply implies the
mentioned pair comprised a weak positive correlation. Moreover, the table reveals that
P is less than 0.00001, this implicates that the mentioned pair is extremely statistically
significant.