Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF SOIL RESOURCE AND WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT
COURSE TITLE:AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS & PRACTICES(SRWM3122)
Prepared by ID.No.
1. NEGASH WELEARGAY………………………………………………………1105789
2. AREGAWI ZERU………………………………………………………………1105589
3.ZEKARIAS MEKONEN………………………………………...………………..1105826
4.KFLE G/YESUS……………………………………………………….…………1105742
6.WELEAYEZGI MEBRAHTU…………………………………………………..1105822
7.HAMELMAL FISSEHA…………………………………………………………..5637/11
9.FREWEYNI LUEL……………………………………………………………....1105617
10.FITAW TSEGAY…………………………………………………………….…..5611/11
11.SELAMAWIT BERIHUN………………………………………………………1105742
12.TEKLEBRHAN G/HIWET……………………………………………………..5620/11
Agroforestry systems & practices assignment. Checklists for the agroforestry systems &
practices in your locality
Site information:
Country: Ethiopia Region: Tigray
Name of village: Mai-gaushala District:Wereda tahtay koraro nerth western
Agro-climatic zone: Dega Name of the data collector:Group member of SRWM(R)
1. List the common agroforestry systems ad practices under each system. Use the following checklists
Type of system Agroforestry combinations
Cash crop Field ble trees species grasses componen interaction type
crop crops ts
Alalim
o
Shbra/
Ater
Zeraba
tal
Acacia Cattle&go
albida t
Agroforestry systems (AFS) can generate income and provide multiple environmental services.
Agroforestry is a collective name for land-use systems and technologies where woody perennials are deliberately used on the
same land-management units as agricultural crops and/ or animals, in either a spatial arrangement or a temporal sequence.
The scale of management and extent of adoption of these different practices in any particular system will vary considerably
depending upon a number of factors. Any of these practices can become an agroforestry system when it is developed or spread to
such an extent in a specific local area so as to form a distinct land utilization type in that area. One essential point to note here is
that an agroforestry practice can be found to exist even in a non-agroforestry land-use system. An example is the practice of
growing rows of Sesbania grandiflora on the bunds of rice paddies in Java, Indonesia. This woody species is harvested for its
leaves as green manure, its flowers are eaten as a vegetable, it provides firewood and it adds to the fertility of the soil underneath
through biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen. Thus the woody species interacts ecologically and economically with the
crop (rice) production system; in other words, it is an agroforestry practice in a crop production system.
I. Functional Classification
Production and protection are, theoretically, two fundamental attributes of all agroforestry systems. This implies
that agroforestry systems have a productive function yielding one or more products that usually meet basic needs and a service
role, i.e., protective function. Based on various functions, the agroforestry systems are classified into the following:
a. Productive Agroforestry system: This system refers to the production of essential commodities required to meet society’s basic
needs. It includes intercropping of trees, home gardens, plantation of trees in and around the crop field, production of animals and
fishes associated with trees. Productive functions are as follows
b. Protective Agroforestry system: This system refers to protect the land, improving climate, reduce wind and water erosion,
improve soil fertility, provide shelter, and other benefits. Protective functions are as follows:
Windbreak.
Shelterbelt.
Soil conservation.
Moisture conservation.
Soil improvement.
The Agroforestry system is related to various ecological factors. It can be classified based on important ecological parameters
(Climate, edaphic and physiographic ones).
Based on Ecological parameters, it can be classified as
a) Tropical: Vegetation in an extreme climate, such as high temperature, low humidity, scarcity of water, etc., e.g.
Tropical Silvopasture.
b) Sub-tropical: Vegetation in suitable climatic conditions. e.g., Agroforestry practices in the subtropical regions.
c) Temperate: Vegetation in low temperature. e.g., Silvopasture or pastoral silviculture in the temperate region.
d) Subalpine: Vegetation in low and medium mountainous regions. e.g., Natural or artificial forest vegetation in low or
medium mountains.
e) Alpine: Vegetation in high mountainous regions. e.g., Natural forest vegetation in high altitude.
3.List the common multipurpose trees in your locality and characterize them
agroforestry is a term used for trees incorporated into farming systems in many diverse ways and for various purposes.
Agroforestry can be, for example, scattered trees on pastures, diverse fruit and nut trees in orchards, but even tree
plantations like rubber tree forests that resemble jungle or perfectly aligned poplars for biomass production. In this scenario,
fruit, fodder and wood products are obtained from trees.
Agroforestry belongs to sustainable farming practices. The practice is based on ecological principles that are
observed in natural ecosystems. here are some good reasons why… Soil fertility and closed nutrient
cycles: Soils are under enormous pressure. Intensive way of farming is based on the principles of
economy rather than the principles of ecology, yet, it deals with living organisms that interact in
complex ways that we cannot simplify and replicate in a uniform way.
More than 900 million hectares of land worldwide is infertile because of high soil salinity . This land cannot
sustain common crops and is often abandoned. But one of the main reasons why the salt content in soils increases
is irrigation-dependent agriculture in areas with drier climate.
Trees do so much for water. Their role in water management is irreplaceable. Incorporating trees into the food
production system is in many cases one of the best strategies we can choose to make sure that soils have optimum
moisture levels to sustain crops.
Standing tall and strong in the landscape, well-rooted in the ground, with branches swinging in the wind, trees are
one of the most stabilizing elements in the landscape. Wildlife and people have instinctively been drawn to trees
for safety in times of discomfort and it has always worked in our favor.
Lower input of agrochemicals
Agroforestry improves soil quality, provides nutrients and modifies microclimate in a way that naturally supports
many crop varieties and livestock. Tree crowns casting shade over land suppress the growth of weeds. Leaves,
branches and bark create protective mulch in intercropping systems. This encourages recycling of nutrients .
Habitat loss due to the modern development and intensive agriculture with hectares of monoculture fields drives
many species of birds, amphibians, insects and even mammals away from large areas of land. This is a problem
because we cannot substitute for services these little creatures perform for the health of ecosystems where we live.
In fact, in many cases we are not even aware of the function of some organism until it disappears and adverse
effects following its demise take over.
Trees have the ability to absorb pollutants from deeper soil layers and immobilize them in their woody parts.
Through their roots creating a rich network that can reach as low as water table, trees prevent groundwater
pollution from nutrient leaching and effectively remove soil contaminants. This includes agricultural pesticides
and their degradation products as well as heavy metals ,but also persistent organic pollutants .
Despite the arguments of farmers advocating for monocultures, properly managed agroforestry
systems diversify farm’s production and can produce bigger quantity from the land. When
suitable tree species are selected, they do not compete with crops for resources. Instead, they
provide additional benefits that support higher crop yields.
Prevention of damage to forests
Through the provision of a wide range of products, agroforestry practices help to prevent
deforestation in places where wood is needed for cooking and as a fuel for other activities.
Other activities that lead to a quick loss of forest cover are charcoal burning and expansion of
agriculture.
In recent years, the role of agroforestry in climate change mitigation and adaptation received particularly strong attention.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) identifies agroforestry as one of the main
climate mitigation practices used in agriculture, and 40 percent of developing countries are considering agroforestry as an
important part of their climate change mitigation plans [25].
There are two ways how agroforestry helps to address problems that are contributing to climate change. Agroforestry
systems:
Agroforestry systems can be as diverse as natural ecosystems are. What works on one farm, may not work on another farm.
The combination of crops, animals and tree species interacts in complex ways that can be difficult to predict.
A successful agroforestry system requires adequate knowledge, planning and periodic tree maintenance. Having trees or
shrubs among the crops doesn’t allow complete mechanization of the farm’s production, which can be a nuisance for some
farmers.
There are very few downsides to agroforestry. However, the main disadvantage for those
trying to grow trees and shrubs for profit is time. Agroforestry is never a quick “fix” because
trees, unlike crops, take a long time to mature before they can really fulfill their purpose in the
system.
Agroforestry is seriously underestimated and overlooked from many perspectives. Unfortunately, one reason why
farmers are reluctant to switch to agroforestry are poorly structured markets for many tree products. A part of the
problem is that many agroforestry products are not commonly traded goods.
After the Second World War, intensive agriculture quickly replaced other forms of farming. Monocultures
prevailed because they were seen as the most productive systems, allowing for mechanization and efficiency of
farming operations. That is when agricultural policies and incentives started to favor these farming methods.
Successful agroforestry systems require proper knowledge and evaluation of the complexities of such a multi-
dimensional production. Farmers need to master the methods of combining different plants, considering their
compatibility and long-term effects on each other. They also need to think of their main objective .
When not selected to complement each other, trees may compete with crops or livestock for resources. If farmers
plant trees in narrow alleys, it is likely that when they will grow bigger, their crowns will shade most of the land
below.
Invasive species and alternate hosts of pests :-The choice of the right tree species determines the
success of the whole system. Trees impact their surrounding environment and their impact doesn’t have to be only
a positive one. In some cases, trees can harbor pests of crops or provide nesting habitats to birds and rodents that
damage crops.
Allelopathy
Some trees produce chemicals that inhibit growth of other plants. This effect is called allelopathy and can be very profound
in some tree species. For example, Eucalyptus trees, that were once favored in agroforestry, suppress vegetation (including
crops) up to a distance of 36 feet (11 meters) away from trees.
5.How do you evaluate the perception of farmers about agroforestry systems and practices? Please
put your suggestions on the future of the system.
Farmer Perceptions
Within the context of agricultural technology adoption, this research defines farmer perceptions as the farmer’s
subjective preferences, which are fundamental characteristics that may impact decision-making processes .Farmer
perceptions are affected by a variety of prior behaviors, experiences, and observations, as well as future aspirations.
These are also influenced by a variety of external factors, including as individual and household characteristics,
institutions, socioeconomic conditions, and environmental conditions .Farmers’ perceptions may shift over time when
new information becomes available and earlier perceptions adapt.[Farmer impressions may or may not correspond to
actual reality. As a result, in order to avoid biased results, the study takes into account all farmer impressions, whether
they reflect reality or not.
The degradation of forest resources and rising demand for forest products, particularly among rural people who rely on forests for
a living, have exacerbated the gap between supply and demand for forest products. Despite increased awareness of the
importance of on-farm trees, this practice cannot significantly improve the positions of landless and impoverished households in
areas where land holding disparities persist. Rather, these practices provide a higher financial return to land-rich households
while providing a lower financial return to land-poor households. Farmers in the study areas are using agroforestry in two ways:
conventional and advanced agroforestry practices. As previously indicated, we developed a framework to demonstrate how
diverse agroforestry systems contribute to household income and assist farmers in building resilience. Multiple factors influence
these characteristics, ultimately motivating farmers to choose agroforestry as a superior method for their improvement. We
designed this study to investigate the drivers of household farm income from AFP at the study sites based on this premise.