Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment #10
Date: 18/03/2024
Materials:
● 125 mL conical flask
● 50.00 mL of 0.1 M HCl
● 25.00 mL pipet
● 25 ml tablet of milk of magnesia
● Burette
● 0.1 M NaOH
● Phenolphthalein indicator
Procedure:
In pairs:
1. In a 125 mL conical flask, 50.00 mL of 0.1 M HCl was pipetted using a 25.00 mL
pipet.
2. A 25 ml tablet of milk of magnesia was taken.
3. The milk of magnesia was dissolved in the acid in the conical flask and boiled for 2
minutes.
4. 0.1 M NaOH was added to the burette, with the instructor showing how to prepare and
read the burette.
5. After boiling, 3 drops of phenolphthalein indicator were added to the conical flask. An
acidic solution would normally be clear at this point; however, since milk of magnesia
was used, it was a colored solution.
6. Titration was then ready to proceed. NaOH was slowly added from the burette while
constantly swirling the conical flask.
7. Titration continued until the solution remained pink for 30 seconds, which indicated
the end-point of the titration.
8. The final volume of the burette was recorded.
9. This process was repeated for 3 more trials.
Kianna Greene
Observations/Calculations:
1. Using the volume of NaOH used, and the .10M NaOH concentration, calculate
the number of moles of NaOH used for each titration of a tablet.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 × 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒
Moles: 1000
0.1 𝑥 31.80
1000
= 0.0031 mol / 3.18 × 10 -3 mol
2. Calculate the moles of excess HCl which reacted with the NaOH in the titration.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 × 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒
Moles: 1000
HCl concentration= 0.1mol/ml3 HCl volume= 100ml
3. Calculate the total number of moles of HCl you added at the beginning, using the
50.0 mL volume and the .10M HCl concentration.
4. Subtract the moles of excess HCl from the initial number of moles of HCl added
to the tablet to give the number of moles of acid which reacted with the milk of
magnesia.
Kianna Greene
Milk of Magnesia:
1000 mg =1g
1200 mg = 1.2g = 15 m1 of Milk of Magnesia
6. Calculate the number of moles of magesium hydroxide that reacted with your
extra acid using your reaction above.
Since is a 1:2 mole ratio the number of moles of MgOH is 3.41 x 10 -3 (2) = 6.82 x 10 -3
mol
Mass of Mg(OH)₂:
Formula for mass= Moles × Molar Mass
Molar Mass= 24 (16+1) 2= 58 g mol Moles= 3.4 x10 -3 moles
Discussion/Questions:
1. How did your value for the mass of MgOH per tablet compare to the value
of 1200mg given on the label?
The value of 1200 mg (or 18 ml, assuming density is 1 g/ml) provided on the
label compares fairly to the estimated value of 16.41% for the mass of magnesium
hydroxide per tablet. Due to experimental variables, such as insufficient
dissolution of tablets or handling losses, there may be small deviations.
Differences between the computed and labeled values may also be caused by
variations in tablet composition and manufacturing techniques. Nonetheless, the
computed percentage is contained within a respectable range of the stated number,
suggesting that the experiment yielded a fair assessment of the magnesium
hydroxide concentration in the pills.
As a result, the titration might be prematurely stopped or continued past the actual
endpoint, leading to errors in determining the exact amount of NaOH required to
neutralize the excess acid. This, in turn, affects the precision and reliability of the results
obtained from the titration.
Mg(OH)₂: 58 g/mol
=1613.79 g
neutralize the same quantity of HCl, suggesting that Mg(OH)₂ has a higher neutralizing
Limitations/Sources of error/Precautions:
Limitations:
● Complete dissolution of the milk of magnesia tablets might be challenging,
affecting the accuracy of the titration results.
● Variability in tablet composition and storage conditions could lead to inconsistent
neutralization reactions.
● Precise endpoint determination may be hindered by the presence of colored
additives in the antacid, potentially causing errors in the titration process.
Precautions:
● Ensure thorough mixing and boiling of the solution to facilitate complete
dissolution of the tablets.
● Store tablets in optimal conditions and use tablets within their expiration date to
maintain consistency in the experiment.
● Dilute colored antacid solutions if necessary to improve visibility of the titration
endpoint and minimize interference from color additives.
Sources of Error:
● Evaporation during boiling could result in concentration variations, impacting the
accuracy of acid neutralization.
● Inaccurate measurement of reagents, such as misreading burette volumes, may
introduce systematic errors.
● Human judgment in detecting the titration endpoint, particularly in colored
solutions, could lead to subjective interpretations and errors in endpoint
determination.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the experiment aimed to assess the effectiveness of a commercial
antacid containing magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) in neutralizing hydrochloric acid
(HCl). By conducting back titration and subsequent calculations, it was determined that
the antacid tablets contained approximately 16.41% magnesium hydroxide. This value,
though slightly lower than the labeled amount of 1200 mg, falls within an acceptable
range considering potential experimental variations. Limitations such as incomplete
Kianna Greene
dissolution of tablets and potential errors from solution evaporation were noted,
emphasizing the importance of careful experimental procedures. Additionally, the
presence of color in some antacids and the relative neutralizing power of different active
ingredients, exemplified by the comparison between Mg(OH)2 and Al(OH)3, were
discussed as factors influencing the accuracy of the analysis. Despite these
considerations, the experiment provided valuable insights into the composition and
efficacy of the antacid tablets in neutralizing stomach acid, contributing to our
understanding of acid-base reactions and pharmaceutical formulations.