EMILIO AGUINALDO COLLEGE

Gov. D. Mangubat Ave., Brgy. Burol Main, City of Dasmariñas, Cavite 4114, Philippines
Tel. Nos. (046) 416-4339/41 www.eac.edu.ph

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION & ACCOUNTANCY

GUIDE QUESTIONS FOR CASE STUDY ANALYSIS IN INCOME TAXATION

Introduction:
• What is the overarching problem or issue addressed in this tax evasion case?
• Why is this problem or issue significant or worthy of investigation?
• What are the main objectives or goals of this case study?

Background of the Study:

• What is the context surrounding the problem or issue?
• What factors or events led to the emergence of this problem or issue?
• What relevant theories, concepts, or previous research should be considered to understand this case study better? You may cite related literature or study in this part.

Discussion:
• What are the key findings or observations from the tax evasion case?
• How do these findings relate to the problem or issue identified in the introduction?
• What are the implications of these findings for theory, practice, or policy?
• Are there any limitations or weaknesses in the case study methodology or data analysis that should be acknowledged?
• Are there any alternative interpretations of the findings that should be considered?

Conclusion:
• What conclusions can be drawn from the findings of this case study?
• How do these conclusions contribute to our understanding of the problem or issue?
• What are the broader implications of these conclusions for theory, practice, or policy?

Recommendation:
• Based on the conclusions drawn from the case study, what recommendations can be made for addressing the problem or issue?
• How can these recommendations be implemented effectively?
• What further research or investigation is needed to build upon the findings of this case study?

QF-SBA-002 (06.06.2023) Rev.03

 EMILIO AGUINALDO COLLEGE
Gov. D. Mangubat Ave., Brgy. Burol Main, City of Dasmariñas, Cavite 4114, Philippines
Tel. Nos. (046) 416-4339/41 www.eac.edu.ph

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION & ACCOUNTANCY

RUBRIC FOR CASE STUDY ANALYSIS IN INCOME TAXATION

CRITERIA 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20

1. Introduction and Background
of the Study
2. Discussion of Findings
3. Conclusion and
Recommendation
4. Clarity and Organization
5. Depth of Analysis and Use of
Evidence
No introduction or poorly defined
problem statement.
Background information is missing
or irrelevant.
No discussion of findings or
analysis is provided.
No conclusion or poorly
summarized findings.
Poorly organized, difficult to
follow, or contains numerous
errors.
Superficial analysis, lacks depth
or critical thinking.
Introduction lacks clarity or
relevance to the case study.
Background information is vague
or incomplete.
Discussion is superficial or lacks
depth.
Conclusion is brief and does not
effectively summarize key
insights.
Recommendations are vague or
unrelated to the case study.
Organization is somewhat
unclear, with frequent errors or
inconsistencies.
Analysis is somewhat shallow or
fails to consider alternative
perspectives.
Introduction provides a clear
overview of the problem or issue
being addressed.
Background information provides
relevant context for understanding
the case study.
Discussion provides some
analysis but lacks thorough
exploration of findings.
Conclusion summarizes key
findings but lacks depth or insight.
Recommendations are relevant
but lack specificity or feasibility.
Generally well-organized, with few
errors or inconsistencies.
Analysis demonstrates depth and
critical thinking but could be more
comprehensive.
Introduction clearly defines the
problem, establishes its
significance, and sets the stage
for the analysis.
Background information
thoroughly explains the context,
factors, and relevant
theories/concepts related to the
case study.
Discussion thoroughly analyzes
key findings, considers
implications, and explores
alternative interpretations.
Conclusion effectively
summarizes key insights, draws
clear conclusions, and discusses
broader implications.
Recommendations are relevant,
specific, and feasible, and they
address the key issues identified
in the case study analysis.
Well-organized, clear, and
concise, with no errors or
inconsistencies.
Analysis is thorough, insightful,
and considers multiple
perspectives in depth.

QF-SBA-002 (06.06.2023) Rev.03

 EMILIO AGUINALDO COLLEGE
Gov. D. Mangubat Ave., Brgy. Burol Main, City of Dasmariñas, Cavite 4114, Philippines
Tel. Nos. (046) 416-4339/41 www.eac.edu.ph

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION & ACCOUNTANCY

Little to no use of evidence or Evidence is sparse or not Evidence is used to support key Evidence is effectively utilized,
reliance on anecdotal information. effectively integrated into the points but could be more relevant, and convincingly
analysis. effectively integrated or supports key points.
contextualized.

Overall Score: 100/100

PREPARED BY:

JOMARI F. DIANA
Instructor
Income Taxation

QF-SBA-002 (06.06.2023) Rev.03