Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student ID:
Activity 1A
Activity 2A
Activity 3A
04 SOCIO-CULTURAL FACTORS
Activity 4A
Activity 4B
06 ETHICAL FACTORS
Activity 6A
08 PRACTICE TASK
Activity 8A
Activity 8B
01 WHY HAVE EOTC?
1A. ACTIVITY
2. Why or why not do you think we should have EOTC trips? What are the
benefits/negatives?
In the diagram below, write what activities you have done or would like to do through school
activities, in your local area and places further afield.
2A. ACTIVITY
Why is a safety management plan important and why is a site visit important?
03 ANALYSING SAFETY MANAGEMENT ISSUES
3A. ACTIVITY
Now you have learnt about managing and minimising risk, consider EOTL activities you have
mentioned in Activity 1A and have been involved in. Identify good practice or any changes
that could have taken place. Explain below ways you could have minimised the risk.
04 SOCIO-CULTURAL FACTORS
4A. ACTIVITY
Discuss the positive or negative impact culture has EOTC of your own choice.
4B. ACTIVITY
Think of a place in your area (or somewhere you have visited) that has cultural significance,
and therefore if you wanted to use it as an outdoor activity venue, you would have to consult
with people involved in the place. Or, think of a place that requires visitors to accept different
cultural views.
Write down the name and location of your chosen place. Answer the questions below, to
explain what issues could occur and why there is a socio-cultural influence, who it affects
and why the socio-cultural impact exists?
1. Name of place
2. Location
3. What issue or issues occurred or could occur and explain the socio-cultural influence on
this issue
6A. ACTIVITY
Here are 10 issues or dilemmas you might face as a leader of an outdoor education trip.
Think of possible solutions or examples to each issue and write them below each title.
1. Informed consent
It is ethical to tell students the content and risks of activities they are going to participate
in, so they can make informed decisions regarding their participation. But when, if ever, is it
appropriate to go ahead without informed consent?
2. Deception
Sometimes in outdoor education, deception is used for the supposed benefit of students.
There is often an element of intentional surprise, of purposely telling students misleading
information, so that students encounter and work through challenges themselves. However,
deception of others is often fraught with danger – so when and how can it be ethically
justifiable?
3. Secrecy
Sometimes leaders in outdoor education intentionally withhold information for the supposed
benefit of the students. For example, giving students a map without roads marked and not
telling students where water can be found to keep this information secret. When and how
can the practice of secrecy be ethically justifiable in outdoor education? Why do leaders do
this?
4. Captive population
A captive population has no choice in their participation. For example, a person is ‘captive’
when up on a high ropes course. They are often faced with choices, such as down the zip
line or climb down a ladder, when they may not have chosen either if they were in a non-
captive situation. Sometimes participants are sent onto programmes and are required to
complete such programmes (such as with boot camp). Thus they are captive in the
programme and not entirely of free will in their participation. Is this ethical?
5. Sexual issues
One example of a sexual issue is when participants in an outdoor education programme who
didn’t previously know one another begin acting on their sexual attraction to one another.
The two participants are open with others about their feelings. Some of the participants feel
uncomfortable about the situation and ask the leader what they think should be done about
the situation. What are the ethical decisions to be made?
6. Environmental concerns
Is it ethically sound to spit toothpaste into the woods? Should participants be required to
swallow their toothpaste, even though it may make some people feel a little sick? For
example, students who went on a tramp through the Abel Tasman National Park drank every
single drop of waste water, including toothpaste and washing up water. Where and how
should toilet waste be discarded to look after the environment? What would you do?
7. Individual versus group benefit
This is a very common dilemma that occurs when there is a conflict between what might
benefit the group versus what might be beneficial for individuals. For
example, a difficult summit might be an ideal challenge for the development of some
individuals, but represent too great a challenge for the group. Sometimes these
matters can be easily resolved (for example, make the summit optional), but a lot of the time
leaders find themselves challenged to compromise group or individual benefits in making a
decision. What would you do?
8. Students’ rights
For example, is it ethically justifiable for an instructor to withhold phone calls or text
messages from family and friends to students, because the instructor believes it is beneficial
for students to spend time only with the group and the environment? What is the student’s
rights?
9. Social implications
10. Paternalism
Paternalism refers to taking away an individual’s right and capacity to make a decision,
supposedly in the interests of that person’s well-being. For example, a person doesn’t want
to use the safety technique suggested by the instructor of a programme. Instead, they want
to use a different, well-proven, safety technique in which he/she has considerable expertise.
The instructor refuses, saying his/her technique is better. What are ethical approaches in
these kinds of situations?
08 PRACTICE TASK
8A. ACTIVITY
Write in the purpose of the caving trip that Josh and Rawiri participated in.
1. Purpose of the trip: to help participants appreciate and develop a respect for the
environment. Learn new things about themselves and how to cooperate with others in a new
environment.
What do you think the purpose of the trip for Josh and Rawiri was?
The following are all the current safety management procedures and strategies that
all students of Te Kura need to follow when participating in an outdoor activity trip.
In the following areas (2–11) highlight all the issues that have arisen from the two
boys going on their caving trip.
Stage 1: Apply for permission from CEO or senior staff member. Once approvals have been
given, proceed with planning.
Stage 2:
Get all participants to fill out health and safety forms, including emergency contact
details.
Plan all key areas, cost, ability of the group and transport. Make sure there are
suitably qualified leaders and assistant leaders; visit the site; assess all the risks;
organise the equipment; and make sure the number of participants is appropriate
(staff: student ratio is appropriate).
Fill in all the relevant forms including SAP and RAMS forms.
Liaise with landowners and plan the best method to minimise the environmental
impact.
Finalise the emergency plan.
Leaders must lead with confidence and ensure the safety of the group:
4. Risk management
5. People
Causal factors:
Not following the set path, ignoring rules.
Emotional state (anxiety levels).
Medical problems.
Poor communication.
Lack of supervision.
Group size.
Loose clothing, and inadequate footwear.
Risk management strategies – normal operation:
Set clear rules and boundaries.
Set up a buddy system to keep each other calm.
Make sure everyone has medication, e.g. asthma inhaler.
Always give clear directions and confirm that all understand and have assistant
leaders keeping an eye on the group.
Keep group size to a minimum, approximately 10 is maximum.
No loose clothing, good shoes or gumboots are to be worn.
6. Equipment
Causal factors:
Gear failure.
No helmet.
Inadequate lighting.
Faulty/poorly maintained equipment.
Misuse of equipment.
Conditions and appropriateness of first aid.
7. Environment
Causal factors:
Foreign objects in the cave.
Animals.
Wet, muddy track.
Rubbish left behind.
Variable weather conditions, floods.
Hazards of the environment (natural or manmade).
Damaging plants and fauna.
Emergency:
Have a clear emergency plan before leaving on the trip. The leader leaves clear instructions,
so, the contact person knows to phone 111 for Cave Search and Rescue if the group is
overdue.
The plans cover:
potential hypothermia
possible rising water, both inside and outside the cave
having alternative exit points and return from those exit points
carrying sufficient lighting/track markers for bush travel, and if the group needs to exit
the cave after dark
having extra clothing, food and water
what to do if there is a suspected neck injury – do not move person, call first aider to
the scene, call 111
having a cell phone for emergency services.
9. Environmental considerations
Site visit: Caves are vulnerable to human impact. Once damage occurs in a cave it will
generally, stay forever. Leaders must minimise the impact of a group going into a cave.
Most New Zealand caves suit a group size of no more than 10 people.
Note: In New Zealand, there are many caves with established approach routes,
entranceways, and in-cave pathways (often marked with tape). Contact local caving groups
and/or Department of Conservation for more information.
Do you tell the participants all the risks associated with the trip?
Do you lead them in the dark?
Do you explore every corner of the cave? This may add little to the group experience
and might cause a lot of damage.
Do you let them explore by themselves?
Do you push people who are scared to squeeze through small gaps? And go further
into the cave?
If someone needs to go to the toilet, what do you do?
Do you give individuals a choice or are they captive?
11. Socio-cultural factors
Find out about any cultural significance of the cave. It may be on iwi land or could be in a
tapu area. Some caves were used as burial sites, so this needs to be investigated. If
necessary, consult with the local iwi or Department of Conservation. Once you have done
this, and you have established access rights, you need to inform all participants of the
cultural significance and how they could offend others if they do not respect the land and the
environment that they are going into. Repeat this message just before entering the cave, to
make sure everyone understands and acts accordingly.
8B. ACTIVITY
Use the flowchart process from Lesson 1 to critically analyse the issues that occurred.
Task 1: Identify at least three safety management issues and analyse (examine) the issues
that contributed to this tragedy.
Evaluate the safety management issues you have identified in terms of their relative
importance
Task 2: Consider the factors that influenced the issues and discuss the inter-relationship
between the factors influencing the safety management issues.
Examine the wider implications of these factors and the relationship between them.
Task 3: Recommend strategies that would have addressed (eliminated or minimised) the
safety management issues and explain what they could have done differently. Support your
recommended strategies with reasons.
Task 1
Write the issues identified below, then critically analyse each issue.
Issue 1:
Issue 2:
Issue 3:
Task 2:
Task 3:
Well done.
You have now finished the activities!
Make sure you name your file with course number, your ID number.