Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edited by
KUI HUANG
Professor, School of Environmental and Municipal
Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China
SARTAJ AHMAD BHAT
JSPS Postdoctoral Researcher River Basin Research Center
Gifu University Japan
GUANGYU CUI
Post-doctoral Researcher, State Key Laboratory of Pollution
Control and Resource Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai,
China
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical
treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such
information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others,
including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume
any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-323-95998-8
Contributors xi
v
vi Contents
1. Introduction 47
2. Persistent pathogens in compost 51
3. Fate of pathogens in insect-composted wastes 52
4. Mechanisms of pathogen suppression by insect frass fertilizer 54
5. Impact of insect frass fertilizer on soil pathogens 55
6. Other benefits of insect frass 56
7. Research prospects 61
8. Conclusion 62
Acknowledgments 63
References 63
1. Introduction 157
2. Methods 159
3. Results and discussion 162
4. Conclusion 172
Acknowledgments 172
References 172
1. Introduction 229
2. Types of animal’s manure 236
3. Application of poultry and animal manures 236
4. Antibiotics 240
5. Antibiotics resistance genes in poultry and animal’s manure 243
6. Source of resistance genes in poultry and animal’s manure 245
7. Conclusion 247
References 247
Further reading 258
1. Introduction 259
2. Vermicomposting process and raw materials used 261
3. Role of earthworms in mitigating ARGs in soil 263
4. Factors directly or indirectly affecting the fate of ARGs during
vermicomposting 265
5. Potential environmental risks of ARGs during vermicomposting 269
6. Control strategies for ARGs during vermicomposting 269
7. Precaution to be taken during vermiremediation 271
8. Conclusion 273
References 273
1. Introduction 297
2. Hazardous solid organic wastes 300
3. Vermicomposting 309
4. Insect-based bioconversion 327
5. Biochar: An ingredient to improve hazardous waste bioconversion 339
Acknowledgments 344
References 345
1. Introduction 359
2. Materials and methods 362
3. Results and discussion 367
4. Conclusions 375
Acknowledgments 376
References 376
Index 381
Contributors
Rituparna Addy
Centre for the Environment, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Amingaon, North Guwahati, Assam,
India
Fuad Ameen
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Ruby Angurana
Department of Zoology, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
Dennis Beesigamukama
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya; Department of Crop Production and
Management, Busitema University, Soroti, Uganda
Dibyendu Chatterjee
ICAR National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, India
Ankita Chowdhury
Laboratory of Applied Stress Biology, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal,
India
Guangyu Cui
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Sujit Das
Laboratory of Applied Stress Biology, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal,
India
Shivika Datta
Department of Zoology, Doaba College, Jalandhar, Punjab, India
Souvik Dey
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India
Gloria Gómez
Engineering and Biotechnology Environmental Group (GIBA-UDEC), Environmental Science Faculty &
Center EULA–Chile, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
xi
xii Contributors
Marı́a Gómez-Brandón
Grupo de Ecologı́a Animal (GEA), University of Vigo, Vigo, Galicia, Spain
Kui Huang
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University; Key Laboratory of Yellow
River Water Environment in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
Ajay Kalamdhad
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Amingaon, North Guwahati,
Assam, India
Dhriti Kapoor
Department of Zoology, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
Vaidehi Katoch
Department of Forensic Science, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
Sardar Khan
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Peshawar, Peshawar; Kohat University of Science and
Technology, Kohat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Ashwani Kumar
Department of Zoology, Doaba College, Jalandhar, Punjab, India
Fusheng Li
River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
Wenjiao Li
River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu; Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto
University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
Wenhui Liu
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University; Key Laboratory of Yellow
River Water Environment in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
Mamun Mandal
Laboratory of Applied Stress Biology, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal,
India
Abhijit Pradhan
ICAR National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, India
Randeep Rakwal
Global Research Arch for Developing Education (GRADE) Academy Pvt. Ltd., Birgunj, Nepal; Faculty of
Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Praveen C. Ramamurthy
Interdisciplinary Centre for Water Research (ICWaR), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
Anamika Roy
Laboratory of Applied Stress Biology, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal,
India
Contributors xiii
Juan C. Sanchez-Hernandez
Laboratory of Ecotoxicology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo,
Spain
Chunlei Sang
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China
Abhijit Sarkar
Laboratory of Applied Stress Biology, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal,
India
Tasneem Sarwar
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan
Jaswinder Singh
Department of Zoology, Khalsa College Amritsar, Amritsar, Punjab, India
Joginder Singh
Department of Biotechnology, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
Simranjeet Singh
Interdisciplinary Centre for Water Research (ICWaR), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
Pilar Suarez
Engineering and Biotechnology Environmental Group (GIBA-UDEC), Environmental Science Faculty &
Center EULA–Chile, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
Fu-Sheng Sun
Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, School of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Shuhei Tanaka
Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto,
Japan
Gratien Twagirayezu
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China
Erukala Venkatramaiah
ICAR National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, India
Gladys Vidal
Engineering and Biotechnology Environmental Group (GIBA-UDEC), Environmental Science Faculty &
Center EULA–Chile, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
Yongfen Wei
River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
Hui Xia
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University; Key Laboratory of Yellow
River Water Environment in Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
Jing Yang
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China
Naik Yaseera
Department of Environmental Sciences, Government Degree College Anantnag, Khanabal, Jammu and
Kashmir, India
Guang-Hui Yu
Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, School of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
This page intentionally left blank
CHAPTER ONE
1. Introduction
Antibiotics are widely used not only in humans but also in animals to
prevent or treat infections caused by bacteria. However, their overuse and
misuse have caused the emergence and prosperity of antibiotic resistance
bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), which led to envi-
ronmental and public health issues and are of great concern worldwide.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO, 2016), the ARGs
problem already claims the lives of 70,000 people worldwide every year.
It is estimated that as many as 10 million people could be dying of
ARGs-related causes every year globally, and about 40% of those deaths will
occur in Asia. The rising levels of ARGs can also hinder progress toward
many of the Sustainable Development Goals, especially those regarding
health, food security, and the environment (FAO et al., 2021). Three pos-
sible reasons for ARGs proliferation in the environment were described by
Lee et al. (2017a) as follows: (1) not fully metabolized antibiotics are signif-
icantly excreted, which account for 30%–90% of the total amount; (2) selec-
tion pressure exerted by antibiotics can facilitate the proliferation of ARB;
and (3) horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between bacteria by mobile genetic
elements (MGEs) can promote the spread of ARGs. Among different
MEGs, integrons were widely investigated and found in approximately
9% of sequenced bacterial genomes (Wang et al., 2020a). Accordingly,
not only the fate and behavior of ARGs in various organic wastes during
treatments but also the occurrence and proliferation potential of ARGs
in the final products after treatments are highly required to be clarified.
However, the comprehensive information on the occurrence, fate, and
behavior of ARGs and MGEs during different biological treatments for
organic wastes as well as the current elimination strategies is not systemi-
cally summarized so far. In this chapter, research progress on ARGs and
HGT-related MGEs in typical organic wastes and their fate and behavior
during different biological treatments were summarized. Additionally, the
current elimination strategies for ARGs and MGEs as well as the possible
mechanisms behind them were also discussed. The critical insights pointed
out here may provide new avenues in the aspect of the elimination of
ARGs and MGEs during biological treatments for organic wastes in further
studies.
Mixture of China Tetracycline; / tetM; sul1, sul2; / 7.9 104– intl1, / 2.8 102, Wang
food waste sulfamethoxazole; ermB; blaCTX-M 2.5 101 intl2 0.8 104 et al.
and waste erythromycin (2021a)
activated
sludge
Kitchen wastes China Tetracyclines; 13.7–57.2; tetA, tetB, tetC, 1.6 1013– / intl1, 4.2 107– / Zhao et al.
sulfonamides; 0.4–20.9; 7.3– tetG, tetM, tetO, 4.5 1014; intl2, 8.9 1010 (2022)
quinolones; 157.4; 0.3–8.0 tetQ, tetW, tetX; 8.8 108– ISCR1,
macrolides sul1, sul2, sul3, 1.6 1010; IncQ,
dfrA7; qnrB, qnrS, 9.5 107– trbC,
acc(60 )-Ib-cr; 6.4 109; tnpA,
ermB, ermF, 7.0 108– Tn916/
ermQ, ermX, 3.0 1010 1545
mefA
Food waste; China Sulfonamide; 6.4–12.0 in sul1, sul2, sul3 and 5.8 105– / / / / Chen
Sewage sludge fluoroquinolone; food waste, and sulA; qnrB, qnrD 1.4 109 in et al.
macrolide 4.5–19.0 in and qnrS; ermB, food waste; (2021)
sewage sludge ermC and ermF 3.5 103–
3.2 109 in
sewage sludge
Fruit and Japan / / tetG, tetM; sul1 1.0 104– / intl1 3.6 104– N/R Li et al.
vegetable 3.8 106 in 8.1 106 in (2021)
waste; Excess fruit and fruit and
activated vegetable waste; vegetable
sludge 2.1 106– waste;
1.4 108 in 3.8 107 in
excess activated excess
sludge activated
sludge
Municipal China Aminoglycoside; / aadA, strB; ermB, aadA: 2.2 108, / intl1, 4 MGEs: / Tang et al.
solid waste macrolide; ermF; sul2; tetM, strB: 1.3 108; intl2, 5.0 106; (2020)
sulfonamide; tetQ ermB: IS26 intl 1:
tetracycline 6.5 106, ermF: and trbC 1.8 106
2.0 108; sul2:
2.2 108; tetM:
3.4 106, tetQ:
1.9 105
Refuse of China Fluoroquinolone; About 1–1400; qnrD, qnrS, mexF; / 8.2 106– intl1, / About Yao et al.
landfill macrolide; 0.5–130; 1–16 ermA, ermB, 1.3 101; intl2, 103–101 (2020)
sulfonamide mefA; sul1, sul2 5.0 106– tnpA01,
2.2 101; tnpA02,
2.2 103– tnpA03
2.88 101
Dewatered China Tetracycline; 1.9 105; ermF; sul1, sul2; About 8 102– / intl1 About / Huang
sludge norfloxacin; 2.6 106; tetM, tetX 1.3 107 (ng/g) 1.1 104 et al.
enrofloxacin; 2.0 105; (ng/g) (2020a)
sulfanilamide 7.8 105;
Continued
Table 1 Occurrence of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in various organic wastes worldwide—cont’d
Antibiotics ARGs MGEs
Relative Absolute Relative
Absolute abundance abundance abundance
Concentration abundance (copies/16S (copies/g- (copies/16S rDNA
Organic wastes Country Type (μg/kg-dry) Type (copies/g-dry) rDNA copies) Type dry) copies) References
Excess Japan / / qnrA, qnrS; sul1; About About intl1 About About Cui et al.
activated tetG, tetM, tetX 4.5 105– 1.0 107– 1.4 1010 3.3 103 (2019)
sludge 1.6 1010 3.8 103
Chicken China / / / / / intl1, / About Zhu et al.
manure; intl2 1.5 1015, (2019)
Bovine manure 1.0 1015 in
chicken manure;
About
3.1 1013,
1.2 1012 in
bovine manure
(copies/g-16S
rDNA)
Swine slurry; Spain Lincosamide; N.D.—6600 in sul1; tetW; qurS; / / intl1 / / Gros et al.
Slaughterhouse tetracycline; swine slurry ermB; blaKPC (2019)
sludge fluoroquinolone; solid fraction;
pleuromutilin; N.D.—5100 in
mebendazole; slaughterhouse
macrolide sludge
Manure; Republic Tetracycline; / tetA, tetB, tetE, / 1.4 103– intl1 / / Lee et al.
Sewage sludge of Korea sulfonamide; tetG, tetH, tetM, 1.8 102 (2017b)
quinolone; tetQ, tetX; sul1, in manure;
macrolide; β- sul2; qnrD; ermB, 2.2 105–
lactam ermC; blaTEM 9.3 102
in sewage
sludge
Sludge from United / / sul1, sul2; ermB, About 108–1010 About intl1 About 109 About 102 Ma et al.
wastewater states ermF; tetC, tetG, 102–104 (2011)
treatment plant tetO, tetW, tetX
(primary:
secondary
¼1: 1)
N.D.: Not detected. /: No data.
8 Wenjiao Li et al.
4. Anaerobic digestion
Anaerobic digestion is conducted by involving various bacteria, such
as hydrolytic bacteria, hydrogen- and acid-producing bacteria, and
methane-producing bacteria during different treating phases (Cui et al.,
2020), representing very complex and various changes of microbial commu-
nities. Inoculum of seeding sludge from wastewater treatment plants or pre-
vious anaerobic digesters can also bring about rich bacteria that could be the
host bacteria of ARGs and MGEs, leading to ARGs transfer during digestion
(Wu et al., 2016; Bai et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019a). Moreover, anaerobic
digestion consists of mesophilic and thermophilic conditions, which could
also influence the spreading of ARGs. Wu et al. (2016) investigated the fate
and behavior of ARGs and MGEs in municipal wastewater sludge and found
that most ARGs reduced during the acidogenic period and then increased
during the methanogenic period, while the MGEs (intl1) slightly reduced
during both two periods. It seems like acid-forming conditions can play a
role in the elimination of ARGs. They also clarified that the thermophilic
condition at 55°C could mitigate the presence of ARGs compared with
the mesophilic condition at 35°C (Wu et al., 2016). Similarly, a previous
study on anaerobic digestion of dairy manure also revealed that ARGs were
significantly enriched during the mesophilic period at 37°C and then reduced
during the thermophilic period at 55°C, indicating a potential risk of ARGs
spreading in the environment if applied the treated solid fraction. For the
effects of antibiotics on ARGs and MGEs, Bai et al. (2019) conducted
mesophilic anaerobic digestion (35 1°C) to treat dewatered sludge with
and without the addition of six types of antibiotics (2 mg/L) and found that
the enrichment of ARGs in the treatment added with antibiotics was about
twice higher than that in the treatment without addition of antibiotics. These
studies all suggested that higher temperature can effectively inhibit the prolif-
eration of ARGs during anaerobic digestion, while rich ARGs still remain in
the final products or will rebound again if the temperature decreased.
10 Wenjiao Li et al.
Table 2 Fate and behavior of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and mobile
genetic elements (MGEs) in organic waste during different treatment technologies.
Antibiotics
Anaerobic digestion Municipal (1) Thermophilic: 55°C; Seeding sludge from an / / / 13 ARGs
wastewater sludge (2) Mesophilic: 35°C anaerobic bioreactor
ARGs MGEs
5.6 105– (1) Most of ARGs intl1 About 109 copies/g (1) and (2): The relatively simple Wu et al.
3.3 109 copies/g reduced during slightly reduced microbial community (2016)
acidogenic period with a in with a range of composition during
range from 0.2 to 1.1 log 0.10–0.50 log acidogenic phase of
units while increased unit thermophilic difestion
during methanogenic due to high temperature
period; (2) ineffective in and acid-forming
reducing ARGs conditions played a role
in mitigating the presence
of ARGs
About 1.0 105 copies/ (1) About 1.8 105; intl1 (1) About (1) About Anaerobic digestion Bai et al.
g-dry (2) about 1.9 102; (2) about 5.0 104; showed some enrichment (2019)
3.0 105 copies/g-dry 2.0 102 copies/ (2) about of ARGs in the control
16S rDNA 2.0 105 (1.85 times) and the
copies/16S antibiotics addition group
rDNA (3.05 times). Sludge
digestion at mesophilic
condition could not
effectively remove most
ARGs. the addition of
anti- biotics in sludge
could contribute
positively to the
accumulation of total
ARGs in the process of
anaerobic digestion
About 9.0 102 copies/ (1) About 1.6 101; intl1 About 4.5 103 (1) About ARGs and MGEs were Zhang
16S rDNA (2) about 1.3 101– copies/16S rDNA 5.0 103; enriched. Magnetite did et al.
1.7 101 copies/16S (2) about not influence the total (2019a)
rNDA 2.5 103– ARGs abundance
6.5 103
copies/16S
rNDA
(1) 1.2 1010 (1) 3.5 108– intl1, intl2 (1) About (1) About 8.0 ARGs in liquid fraction Zhang
copies/mL; 7.8 109 copies/mL; and Tn916/ 2.7 10 copies/
8
106–9.0 107 decreased by 0.06–1.80 et al.
(2) 9.2 109 (2) 1.5 1010–5.1 1010 1545 mL; copies/mL; logs while those in solid (2021)
copies/g-dry copies/g-dry (2) 6.9 108 copies/ (2) about fraction increased by
g-dry 2.2 108– 0.08–7.85 logs. Digested
9.0 108 solid had the potential
copies/g-dry risks to promote the
spread of ARGs in the
environment, post-
treated is requied before
the application
(1) 6.9 108– (1) 2.7 109–1.1 1010 intl1 and (1) 5.5 1014– (1) 1.0 1016– Total ARG abundance of Wang
3.0 109 copies/mL; copies/mL; intl2 6.8 1015 copies/ 2.4 1017 food waste was increased et al.
(2) 1.3 1010–2.6 1010 (2) 3.8 109– mL; (2) 3.7 1017– copies/mL; after biological treatment. (2020a)
copies/mL 5.5 10 copies/mL
9
2.1 1018 copies/ (2) 1.3 1016– MGEs facilitated ARGs
mL 1.4 1017 propagation
copies/mL
Continued
12 Wenjiao Li et al.
Table 2 Fate and behavior of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and mobile
genetic elements (MGEs) in organic waste during different treatment technologies—cont’d
Antibiotics
Mixture of cow 45 days (45°C at day 1, Sulfamethoxazole:(1) 0; Sulfamethoxazole (1) 0.03; (1) N.D.; sul1, sul2,
manure and corn 55°C at day 5, 50°C at (2) 25; (3) 50; (4) 100 (2) 0.27; (2) N.D.; dfrA7,
straw day 11, 45°C at day 21, (mg/kg) (3) 0.82; (3) N.D.; dfrA1, and
40°C at day 31, 35°C at (4) 2.28 mg/kg (4) N.D. after sulA
day 41, and 25°C at day 45) 25 days
Vermicomposting Pelleted sewage 2 months; (1) without Cow dung (1: 1 dry basis) / / / 9 ARGs
sludge earthworms (composting);
(2) with earthworms: 100
earthworms/ 4 kg
Pelletized 100 earthworms/ 4 kg; (1) without and (2) with / / / tetC,
dewatered sludge 60 days addition of tetracycline tetG,
with different tetM,
concentrations (100, 500, tetO,
and 1000 mg/kg) tetQ, tetX
ARGs MGEs
2.8 10 –11
2.8 10 –2.8 10
7 11
intl1 1.4 10 (copies/g) About 1.2 10
11 10
Thermophilic Fahad
6.6 108 copies/g (copies/g) (copies/g) temperature facilitated et al.
the degradation of (2021)
antibiotics; A noteworthy
effect of composting
properties, especially
temperature on bacterial
community, which then
had a positive effect on
ARGs abundances
2.3 109 copies/g-dry 1.1 1010 copies/g-dry intl1, intl2, 3.3 108 copies/g- 1.5 109 Eight target ARGs Guo et al.
(ermB and tetM IS26, and dry copies/g-dry increased 427% on (2021)
decreased, while other six trbC average, with a trend of
ARGs increased) increase at early stage and
decrease at later stage, and
the main reduction stage
appeared in maturity
stage. Prolonging the
maturity period would
inhibit the growth of
potential host bacteria of
ARGs during
composting, therefore
inhibiting the
transmission of ARGs
/ (1) 9 ARGs increased by intl1 / MGEs in final Vermicomposting abated Huang
1–27 folds; (2) 7 ARGs product of 2) was the potential risk of the et al.
(except for tetX and tetG) 68.1% lower ARGs dissemination (2018)
reduced by 40%–100% than those in 1) since the earthworms
strongly affected the
possible host bacteria
encoding ARGs and
MGEs
About 0.0–18.0 (1) tetC and tetG: (efflux intl1 About 1.6 (1) Decreased by Addition of tetracycline Xia et al.
(copies/16S rDNA) pump genes): a small (copies/16S rDNA) 0.7 folds; significantl increased the (2019)
increase; tetM and tetW (2) increased by abundances of ARGs and
(ribosomal protecting 5.1–5.7 folds MGEs. Low tetracycline
genes): small but concentration
insignificant decrease; (100 mg/kg) could
tetX (enzymatic enhance the earthworms’
inactivator): reduced growth
significantly; (2) ARGs in
all treatments were
enhanced
(1) 1.0 104–3.8 106; (1) significantly increased; intl1 (1) 3.6 104– Significantly Elimination of ARGs and Li et al.
(2) 2.1 106–1.4 108; (2) significantly 8.1 106; decreased in the MGEs were probably due (2021)
(3) between (1) and decreased; (3) elimination (2) 3.8 10 ;
7
most treatments to the gut of earthworms
(2) copies/g-dry effect differed among the (3) between (1) and selectively digest the host
studied types of fruit and (2) copies/g-dry bacteria
vegetable wastes
6.0 105– (1) and (2) slightly intl1 2.3 105– Decreased under Vermicomposting at Cui et al.
1.3 109 copies/g-dry decreased; (3) no changes 2.7 107 copies/ (1), (2) and (3) 25°C did not significantly (2022)
or silghtly increased g-dry attenuate the targeted
ARGs relative to that at
15°C and 20°C
14 Wenjiao Li et al.
5. Aerobic composting
Traditional composting under aerobic conditions is also recognized as
a sustainable technology for treating organic wastes worldwide. It can be
applied for a full treatment course or combined with other treatment
approaches such as anaerobic digestion. Wang et al. (2020b) investigated
the ARGs and MGEs in the initial and biologically treated food waste after
aerobic and anaerobic co-digestion processes and found that the absolute
abundances of ARGs and MGEs decreased obviously after the aerobic pro-
cess while enriched after the anaerobic process. However, the total relative
abundances of ARGs and MGEs significantly increased in both treatments.
The usage of inoculum sludge containing rich ARGs could be one of the
possible reasons for the higher enriched ARGs after anaerobic co-digestion.
A recent study comprehensively confirmed the fate and behavior of antibi-
otics, ARGs, and MGEs in kitchen wastes during composting under differ-
ent temperatures (Zhao et al., 2022). It is recorded that abundances of some
targeted ARGs increased with different extents between a range of 5.4%–
8534.7% and the reduction of antibiotics differed among different types.
Although the kitchen waste was composted, however, it persisted under-
estimated sources of antibiotics and ARGs. Ezzariai et al. (2018) also
reported that reduction efficiencies of antibiotics were different depending
on their chemical structures, while almost could be removed with a range
from 70% to 99%. In addition, Zhao et al. (2022) indicated that temperature,
pH, and water content also considerably affected the reduction of antibiotics
and MGEs. Likewise, Cui et al. (2020) concluded that chemical factors
including pH, NH+4 , and NO 3 could also influence the ARGs in organic
wastes such as excess activated sludge and animal manure. Another more
detailed report of temperature effects on ARGs is given by Fahad et al.
(2021) via carrying out a temperature-controlled aerobic composting of
cow manure mixed with corn straw. ARGs significantly decreased in the
initial 10 days of the thermophilic phase (45°C–55°C) but increased greatly
after 30 days (35°C–25°C). It is designated that the positive effect on the
abundance of ARGs could be explained as the temperature impacted the
bacterial community. The composition of potential host bacteria for ARGs
changed during composting, indicating a close association with the mainte-
nance of ARGs, Liao et al. (2019) also pointed out based on the results
obtained from food waste composting. In contrast to the studies above,
an earlier study on the changes of ARGs and their potential host bacteria
Occurrence, fate, and behavior of antibiotic resistance genes 15
6. Vermicomposting
Compared with composting, vermicomposting has more effective
functions of biodegradation and stabilization of the organic wastes through
the joint action of earthworms and microorganisms (Li et al., 2020a). Due to
the joint of earthworms and the bacteria in their gut, the fate and behavior of
ARGs during vermicomposting are more complex than that in composting
because the latter relies only on mesophilic and/or thermophilic bacteria
(Cui et al., 2020). Besides the evaluation based on the stabilization efficiency
of sewage sludge or nutrition values of final products (Huang et al., 2014,
2017), the elimination potentials for antibiotics and ARGs in the sludge
of traditional composting and vermicomposting were also investigated by
(Huang et al., 2018). Through conducting the sludge stabilization experi-
ment with and without earthworms, significant inhibition effects of earth-
worms on the tetracycline and related ARGs, as well as MGEs, were
observed. This phenomenon was explained as the reason that earthworms
can strongly affect the possible host bacteria encoding ARGs and MGEs,
hence abating the pathogenic bacteria in the final product. An earlier study
on treating excess sludge also reported that vermicomposting greatly atten-
uated the targeted ARGs in sludge by 85.6%–100% bringing about the
changes of microbial profiles (Cui et al., 2018). As was mentioned in the
previous sections, temperature plays a critical role in the mitigation of ARGs
and MGEs during biological treatments either under anaerobic or aerobic
conditions, a lack of information for the effect on earthworms and ARGs
in vermicomposting products. Temperature-controlled (15°C, 20°C, and
25°C) vermicomposting of excess activated sludge was established, and
the fate of ARGs was clarified (Cui et al., 2022). Results showed that
25°C cannot significantly attenuate ARGs in sludge compared with lower
temperatures. In addition, the bacterial diversity in the final product was also
impacted presenting a lower Shannon index, indicating that the growth of
some species of possible host bacteria may rebound the ARGs. However, it
16 Wenjiao Li et al.
is found that the dynamics of targeted ARGs at 15°C and 20°C (higher
kinetic coefficient) fitted to the first-order kinetic equation, proposing that
the vermicomposting at 20°C had more significant removal of ARGs. To
explore the mechanisms of ARGs elimination by earthworms, studies focus-
ing on the bacteria from earthworms’ gut by investigating the fresh casts
were carried out. Cui et al. (2019) clarified that earthworm casts contained
significantly lower absolute abundances of ARGs compared with the initial
sludge before gut digestion. Additionally, the bacterial number and diversity
were remarkably reduced due to the digestion of the earthworm’s gut.
Another recent study investigated the changes of ARGs and MGEs in the
fresh cast derived from earthworms before and after vermicomposting of five
types of fruit and vegetable wastes, excess activated sludge and their mix-
tures, respectively (Li et al., 2021). The relative abundances of ARGs and
MGEs against 16S rDNA in fresh cast samples were reduced markedly
and much lower than those in all different organic wastes after ver-
micomposting (about 1–3 orders of magnitude). It is indicated that the
gut of earthworms could selectively reduce the host bacteria harboring
ARGs and MGEs through activation of non-antibiotic resistance bacteria
or digestion of the ARB.
manure with the addition of another additive namely lignite (Guo et al.,
2020). Guo et al. (2020) also indicated that the addition of lignite facilitated
the reduction of ARGs due to its effects on the shifts of the microbial com-
munity responding to the physicochemical factors. Besides, some advanced
nanomaterials such as nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) and nano-
magnetite were also be explored for the elimination of ARGs during bio-
logical organic wastes treatments (Wang et al., 2019; Zhang et al.,
2019b). No matter the reduction of ARGs and MGEs was enhanced by
the additives or not, a strong interaction among the additives, environmental
factors, and microbial community was found. Biochar is highly porous and
could effectively adsorb the substrates; therefore, it is widely used for con-
taminants controlling in many aspects such as antibiotics and heavy metals.
Recently, the feasibilities of biochar for eliminating the ARGs and MEGs
during the storage of pig manure (Ngigi et al., 2020), vermicomposting
of dewatered sludge (Huang et al., 2020a), and aerobic composting of
chicken manure (Zhou et al., 2021) were also investigated. An agreement
that can be drawn is that biochar can influence the physicochemical factors
of organic wastes, hence further impacting the bacterial composition, which
directly responds to the ARGs and MEGs. Moreover, some researchers have
tried to mix different types of organic wastes to eliminate the ARGs and
MGEs by adjusting the properties of wastes (Song et al., 2017; Li et al.,
2021). The strategies mentioned above can provide some insights for elim-
inating ARGs and MGEs during biological treatments of organic wastes.
However, considerable ARGs and MGEs still can be found in the final prod-
ucts after treatments, and deeper studies are highly required.
References
Awasthi, M.K., Liu, T., Chen, H., Verma, S., Duan, Y., Awasthi, S.K., Wang, Q., Ren, X.,
Zhao, J., Zhang, Z., 2019. The behavior of antibiotic resistance genes and their associ-
ations with bacterial community during poultry manure composting. Bioresour.
Technol. 280, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.030.
Bai, Y., Xu, R., Wang, Q.-P., Zhang, Y.-R., Yang, Z.-H., 2019. Sludge anaerobic digestion
with high concentrations of tetracyclines and sulfonamides: dynamics of microbial com-
munities and change of antibiotic resistance genes. Bioresour. Technol. 276, 51–
59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2018.12.066.
Bhat, S.A., Cui, G., Li, W., Wei, Y., Li, F., Kumar, S., Ameen, F., 2022. Challenges and
opportunities associated with wastewater treatment systems. In: Kumar, S., Kumar,
R., Pandey, A. (Eds.), Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering.
Elsevier, pp. 259–283, https://doi.org/10.1016/c2020-0-00498-6.
Chen, Z., Li, Y., Ye, C., He, X., Zhang, S., 2021. Fate of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance
genes during aerobic co-composting of food waste with sewage sludge. Sci. Total Envi-
ron. 784, 146950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146950.
Cui, G., Li, F., Li, S., Bhat, S.A., Ishiguro, Y., Wei, Y., Yamada, T., Fu, X., Huang, K.,
2018. Changes of quinolone resistance genes and their relations with microbial profiles
during vermicomposting of municipal excess sludge. Sci. Total Environ. 644, 494–
502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.015.
Cui, G., Bhat, S.A., Li, W., Wei, Y., Kui, H., Fu, X., Gui, H., Wei, C., Li, F., 2019. Gut
digestion of earthworms significantly attenuates cell-free and -associated antibiotic resis-
tance genes in excess activated sludge by affecting bacterial profiles. Sci. Total Environ.
691, 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.177.
Cui, G., L€ u, F., Zhang, H., Shao, L., He, P., 2020. Critical insight into the fate of antibiotic
resistance genes during biological treatment of typical biowastes. Bioresour. Technol.
317, 123974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123974.
Cui, G., Fu, X., Bhat, S.A., Tian, W., Lei, X., Wei, Y., Li, F., 2022. Temperature impacts
fate of antibiotic resistance genes during vermicomposting of domestic excess activated
sludge. Environ. Res. 207, 112654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112654.
Ezzariai, A., Hafidi, M., Khadra, A., Aemig, Q., El Fels, L., Barret, M., Merlina, G.,
Patureau, D., Pinelli, E., 2018. Human and veterinary antibiotics during composting
of sludge or manure: global perspectives on persistence, degradation, and resistance
genes. J. Hazard. Mater. 359, 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.092.
Fahad, M., Zhu, C., Geng, B., Raza, H., Song, T., Li, H., 2021. The fate of antibiotic
resistance genes in cow manure composting : shaped by temperature-controlled com-
posting stages. Bioresour. Technol. 320, 124403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biortech.2020.124403.
FAO, OIE, WHO, UNEP, 2021. Antimicrobial Resistance and the United Nations Sustain-
able Development Cooperation Framework. Paris, FAO, OIE and WHO, pp. 1–24.
Gros, M., Marti, E., Balcázar, J.L., Boy-Roura, M., Busquets, A., Colón, J., Sànchez-Melsió,
A., Lekunberri, I., Borrego, C.M., Ponsá, S., Petrovic, M., 2019. Fate of pharmaceuticals
and antibiotic resistance genes in a full-scale on-farm livestock waste treatment plant.
J. Hazard. Mater. 378, 120716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.109.
Occurrence, fate, and behavior of antibiotic resistance genes 23
Guo, H.G., Chen, Q.L., Hu, H.W., He, J.Z., 2020. Fate of antibiotic resistance genes during
high-solid anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with lignite. Bioresour. Technol. 303,
122906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122906.
Guo, W., Huang, C., Xi, B., Tang, Z., Tan, W., Li, W., Zhang, Y., Li, W., 2021. The matu-
rity period is the main stage of antibiotic resistance genes reduction in aerobic com-
posting process of swine manure in sub-scale farms. Bioresour. Technol. 319,
124139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124139.
Huang, K., Li, F., Wei, Y., Fu, X., Chen, X., 2014. Effects of earthworms on physicochem-
ical properties and microbial profiles during vermicomposting of fresh fruit and vegetable
wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 170, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.
07.058.
Huang, K., Xia, H., Cui, G., Li, F., 2017. Effects of earthworms on nitrification and ammo-
nia oxidizers in vermicomposting systems for recycling of fruit and vegetable wastes. Sci.
Total Environ. 578, 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.172.
Huang, K., Xia, H., Wu, Y., Chen, J., Cui, G., Li, F., Chen, Y., Wu, N., 2018. Effects of
earthworms on the fate of tetracycline and fluoroquinolone resistance genes of sewage
sludge during vermicomposting. Bioresour. Technol. 259, 32–39. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.021.
Huang, K., Chen, J., Guan, M., Xia, H., Lin, L., 2020a. Effects of biochars on the fate of
antibiotics and their resistance genes during vermicomposting of dewatered sludge.
J. Hazard. Mater. 397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122767.
Huang, K., Xia, H., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Cui, G., Li, F., Bai, W., Jiang, Y., Wu, N., 2020b.
Elimination of antibiotic resistance genes and human pathogenic bacteria by earthworms
during vermicomposting of dewatered sludge by metagenomic analysis. Bioresour.
Technol. 297, 122451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122451.
Karkman, A., Do, T.T., Walsh, F., Virta, M.P.J., 2018. Antibiotic-resistance genes in waste
water. Trends Microbiol. 26, 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.005.
Lee, J., Jeon, J.H., Shin, J., Jang, H.M., Kim, S., Song, M.S., Kim, Y.M., 2017a. Quantitative
and qualitative changes in antibiotic resistance genes after passing through treatment pro-
cesses in municipal wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Total Environ. 605–606, 906–
914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.250.
Lee, J., Shin, S.G., Jang, H.M., Kim, Y.B., Lee, J., Kim, Y.M., 2017b. Characterization of
antibiotic resistance genes in representative organic solid wastes: food waste-recycling
wastewater, manure, and sewage sludge. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.scitotenv.2016.11.187.
Li, W., Bhat, S.A., Li, J., Cui, G., Wei, Y., Yamada, T., Li, F., 2020a. Effect of excess acti-
vated sludge on vermicomposting of fruit and vegetable waste by using novel ver-
mireactor. Bioresour. Technol. 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122816.
Li, W., Bhat, S.A., Wei, Y., Li, F., 2020b. Vermicomposting treatment of fruit and vegetable
waste and the effect of the addition of excess activated sludge. In: Bhat, S.A., Vig, A.P.,
Li, F., Ravindran, B. (Eds.), Earthworm Assisted Remediation of Effluents and Wastes.
Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp. 141–159, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-
4522-1_9.
Li, W., Li, J., Bhat, S.A., Wei, Y., Deng, Z., Li, F., 2021. Elimination of antibiotic resistance
genes from excess activated sludge added for effective treatment of fruit and vegetable
waste in a novel vermireactor. Bioresour. Technol. 325, 124695. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124695.
Liao, H., Friman, V.P., Geisen, S., Zhao, Q., Cui, P., Lu, X., Chen, Z., Yu, Z., Zhou, S.,
2019. Horizontal gene transfer and shifts in linked bacterial community composition
are associated with maintenance of antibiotic resistance genes during food waste com-
posting. Sci. Total Environ. 660, 841–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.
12.353.
24 Wenjiao Li et al.
Ma, Y., Wilson, C.A., Novak, J.T., Riffat, R., Aynur, S., Murthy, S., Pruden, A., 2011.
Effect of various sludge digestion conditions on sulfonamide, macrolide, and tetracycline
resistance genes and class i integrons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 7855–7861. https://doi.
org/10.1021/es200827t.
Ngigi, A.N., Ok, Y.S., Thiele-Bruhn, S., 2020. Biochar affects the dissipation of antibiotics
and abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in pig manure. Bioresour. Technol. 315,
123782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123782.
Pazda, M., Kumirska, J., Stepnowski, P., Mulkiewicz, E., 2019. Antibiotic resistance genes
identified in wastewater treatment plant systems—a review. Sci. Total Environ. 697,
134023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134023.
Song, W., Wang, X., Gu, J., Zhang, S., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Qian, X., Sun, W., 2017. Effects of
different swine manure to wheat straw ratios on antibiotic resistance genes and the micro-
bial community structure during anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 231, 1–
8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.054.
Tang, Z., Xi, B., Huang, C., Tan, W., Li, W., Zhao, X., Liu, K., Xia, X., 2020. Mobile
genetic elements in potential host microorganisms are the key hindrance for the removal
of antibiotic resistance genes in industrial-scale composting with municipal solid waste.
Bioresour. Technol. 301, 122723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122723.
Tian, X., Han, B., Liang, J., Yang, F., Zhang, K., 2021. Tracking antibiotic resistance genes
(ARGs) during earthworm conversion of cow dung in northern China. Ecotoxicol.
Environ. Saf. 222, 112538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112538.
Wang, P., Chen, X., Liang, X., Cheng, M., Ren, L., 2019. Effects of nanoscale zero-valent
iron on the performance and the fate of antibiotic resistance genes during thermophilic
and mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 293,
122092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122092.
Wang, Y., Gao, J., Duan, W., Zhang, W., Zhao, Y., Liu, J., 2020a. Inactivation of sulfon-
amide antibiotic resistant bacteria and control of intracellular antibiotic resistance trans-
mission risk by sulfide-modified nanoscale zero-valent iron. J. Hazard. Mater. 400,
123226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123226.
Wang, P., Qiao, Z., Li, X., Wu, D., Xie, B., 2020b. Fate of integrons, antibiotic resistance
genes and associated microbial community in food waste and its large-scale biotreatment
systems. Environ. Int. 144, 106013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106013.
Wang, P., Wu, D., Su, Y., Li, X., Xie, B., 2021a. Dissemination of antibiotic resistance under
antibiotics pressure during anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sludge: insights of
driving factors, genetic expression, and regulation mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 344,
126257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126257.
Wang, P., Wang, X., Chen, X., Ren, L., 2021b. Effects of bentonite on antibiotic resistance
genes in biogas slurry and residue from thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion
of food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 336, 125322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biortech.2021.125322.
Wei, H., Ma, J., Su, Y., Xie, B., 2020. Effect of nutritional energy regulation on the fate of
antibiotic resistance genes during composting of sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol.
297, 122513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122513.
WHO, 2016. Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. Microbe Magazine,
pp. 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.10.354.1.
Wu, Y., Cui, E., Zuo, Y., Cheng, W., Rensing, C., Chen, H., 2016. Influence of two-phase
anaerobic digestion on fate of selected antibiotic resistance genes and class I integrons in
municipal wastewater sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 211, 414–421. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.086.
Xia, H., Chen, J., Chen, X., Huang, K., Wu, Y., 2019. Effects of tetracycline residuals on
humification, microbial profile and antibiotic resistance genes during vermicomposting
Occurrence, fate, and behavior of antibiotic resistance genes 25
Human pathogenic
microorganism in sludge
Pilar Suarez, Gloria Gómez, and Gladys Vidal
Engineering and Biotechnology Environmental Group (GIBA-UDEC), Environmental Science Faculty &
Center EULA–Chile, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
1. Introduction
Sewage is a mixture of black water and gray water. Sewage is made up
of human stool and urine. On the other hand, gray water is mainly com-
posed of detergents from household washing (Bauman-Kaszubska and
Sikorski, 2018). Due to the amount and variety of pollutants present, both
organic matter, nutrients, micro-pollutants, and microbiological compo-
nents, sewage must be treated (Garcia-Aljaro et al., 2019; Praus, 2019).
Fig. 1 shows different stages of treatment that the wastewater must
undergo for purification (WHO, 2016). The first phase is a physicochemical
treatment that seeks to remove suspended solids, fats and oils, generating the
primary sludge as a by-product. Due to this, the primary sludge contains 2%
to 9% solids, while 90% is water (Gherghel et al., 2019).
Subsequently, the wastewater undergoes a biological treatment to elim-
inate organic matter through aerobic or anaerobic biological conditions. In
this stage of the treatment, secondary effluents are generated that still contain
pathogenic microorganisms, which must be cleaned up through different
disinfection technologies. In addition, the aerobic biological treatment
transforms 60% of the organic matter into bacterial biomass, generating
the secondary sludge. Whereas, in anaerobic treatments, only 10% of
the organic matter is transformed into biomass. The secondary sludge is
characterized by having a concentration between 0.8% and 3.3% of total
solids and 90% of water (Gherghel et al., 2019).
Sludge management is a problem for all sewage treatment systems. An
estimated 5.3 million metric tons per year of sludge are produced in the
United States (Dumontet et al., 2001). Sludge production in developing
countries is estimated to vary between 346 and 504 m3/per capita day
(Mesdaghinia et al., 2015). The greater the number of inhabitants, the more