Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISBN: 978-1-26-425721-8
MHID: 1-26-425721-X
The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-1-26-425720-1,
MHID: 1-26-425720-1.
All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trade-
marked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringe-
ment of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps.
McGraw-Hill Education eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions or for use in
corporate training programs. To contact a representative, please visit the Contact Us page at www.mhprofessional.com.
TERMS OF USE
This is a copyrighted work and McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work
is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the
work, you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit,
distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill Education’s prior consent. You
may use the work for your own noncommercial and personal use; any other use of the work is strictly prohibited. Your right to
use the work may be terminated if you fail to comply with these terms.
THE WORK IS PROVIDED “AS IS.” McGRAW-HILL EDUCATION AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO GUARANTEES
OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY OR COMPLETENESS OF OR RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED
FROM USING THE WORK, INCLUDING ANY INFORMATION THAT CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE WORK VIA
HYPERLINK OR OTHERWISE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUD-
ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE. McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors do not warrant or guarantee that the functions contained in the work will
meet your requirements or that its operation will be uninterrupted or error free. Neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its licensors
shall be liable to you or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error or omission, regardless of cause, in the work or for any damages
resulting therefrom. McGraw-Hill Education has no responsibility for the content of any information accessed through the work.
Under no circumstances shall McGraw-Hill Education and/or its licensors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, punitive,
consequential or similar damages that result from the use of or inability to use the work, even if any of them has been advised of
the possibility of such damages. This limitation of liability shall apply to any claim or cause whatsoever whether such claim or
cause arises in contract, tort or otherwise.
This edition is dedicated to the readers who will find this edition useful as this has been
the goal of our efforts to complete this revision, especially an era of COVID where
everything has been more difficult, but new important knowledge has been emerging and
important. I primarily dedicate this to my co-editor, friend and colleague, Bob Hendel,
who has had such an important role in all four editions bringing important comments,
revisions, and humor to the process.
G.V.H.
For my colleagues-past, present, and future, who have provided me with inspiration
throughout my career. Additionally, this book is also dedicated to those “behind the
scenes,” such as our dedicated and passionate technologists, thoughtful administrators, and
societal/regulatory personnel who help optimize the value of nuclear cardiology. And of
course, to Gary Heller, the instigator and inspirator for Nuclear Cardiology: Practical
Applications and kayaker extraordinaire.
R.C.H.
Section 2. R
adionuclide Myocardial 17. Evaluation of Patients with Suspected
Perfusion Imaging�������������� 119 Coronary Artery Disease�������������� 299
Sanjeev U. Nair and Gary V. Heller
8. Exercise and Pharmacologic
Stress Testing���������������������� 121 18. Evaluation of Patients with
Seyed Mehdi Khalafi, Archana Ramireddy and Known Coronary Artery Disease�������� 323
Robert C. Hendel Javier Gomez and Rami Doukky
vii
Javier Gomez, MD, FACC, FASNC Edward J. Miller, MD, PhD, FASNC, FACC
Assistant Professor of Medicine Associate Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) and
Director and Cardio-Oncology Services Radiology & Biomedical Imaging
Division of Cardiology Yale University School of Medicine
Cook County Health Section of Cardiovascular Medicine
Chicago, Illinois New Haven, Connecticut
Gary V. Heller, MD, PhD, FACC, MASNC Robert J.H. Miller, MD, FRCPC, FACC
Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute Clinical Assistant Professor
Morristown Medical Center Department of Cardiac Sciences
Morristown, New Jersey University of Calgary and Libin Cardiovascular Institute
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Robert C. Hendel, MD, FAHA,
FSCCT, MACC, MASNC Sue Miller, CNMT
Sidney W. and Marilyn S. Lassen Chair in Cardiovascular Chief Operating Officer
Medicine Molecular Imaging Services, Inc.
Professor of Medicine and Radiology Newark, Delaware
Tulane University School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana
Sumeet S. Mitter, MD, MSc
Assistant Professor
Cory Henderson, MD Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology
Assistant Professor of Medicine and Radiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of New York, New York
Medicine
Boston University School of Medicine
Sanjeev U. Nair, MBBS, MD, FACP, FACC, FSCAI
Interventional Cardiologist
Boston, Massachusetts
SN Cardiovascular Associates
Milena J. Henzlova, MD Fort Worth, Texas
Professor of Medicine (retired)
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Muhammad Siyab Panhwar, MD
Cardiovascular Medicine Fellow
New York, New York
Tulane University Medical Center
Cole B. Hirschfeld New Orleans, Louisiana
Fellow, Cardiovascular Disease
Weill Cornell Medicine
Krishna K. Patel, MD, MSc
Assistant Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) and
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Population Health and Policy
New York, New York
The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute
Seyed Mehdi Khalafi, MD Blavatnik Women’s Health Research Institute
Cardiovascular Medicine Fellow Institute for Transformative Clinical Trials
Tulane University Medical Center Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New Orleans, Louisiana New York, New York
We are pleased to present this fourth edition of Nuclear questions with detailed answers related to each chapter,
Cardiology: Practical Applications. We have undertaken found at the end of the book.
substantial revisions, emphasizing recent changes in tech- This fourth edition is ideally suited for trainees and
nology as well as the contemporary clinical applications of early-career professionals both radiologists and cardi-
nuclear cardiology. We have provided insight as to future ologists. Additionally, this book should be very useful for
directions of the field, delineating where this important technologists and healthcare professionals involved in
imaging modality is positioned in current-day clinical decision-making for testing procedures.
practice, especially in the setting of multi-modality imag- We are grateful to the contributors who have done an
ing. We have greatly expanded information regarding outstanding job updating and expanding the book and its
positron emission tomography, including an entire chapter value. We hope that you find the fourth edition of Nuclear
on the assessment of myocardial blood flow. Each chapter Cardiology: Practical Applications useful and that it will be a
now features a table of key points and many of the tables focal point for your nuclear cardiology education. To this end,
and figures have been updated and expanded. We believe it is our goal to assist in the improvement of nuclear cardiol-
these help in the learning process as well as providing easy ogy practice and to benefit the patients for which we care.
referencing key pieces of information. For your personal
knowledge assessment, especially for preparation for cre- Gary V. Heller
dentialing examinations, we have provided a multitude of Robert C. Hendel
xiii
1
FUNDAMENTALS OF
NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY
origins of either type of radiation may be from the n is the quantum number. Therefore, the maximum
nucleus or the electron structure. number of electrons for each shell is:
L shell
• Low binding energy
M shell
• Lower binding energy Unique binding energies
LIII>LII>LI
FIGURE 1-1 Atomic structure. The nucleus is surrounded by FIGURE 1-2 Electron configuration. Electrons are arranged
electron shells. The binding energy decreases as the distance in subshells, as illustrated for the L shell. Each subshell has a
from the nucleus increases (K > L > M). unique binding energy.
of energy input to move the electron from the “K” Z (Atomic number) = # Protons
shell to the “L” shell. N = # Neutrons
Conversely, the movement of an electron from an
outer shell to an inner shell, L → K, yields energy. Since the number of neutrons (N) can be derived
This energy yield results in the emission of radiation. from the atomic mass number (A) and the number
The energy of the radiation is equal to the differences of protons (Z), it is usually omitted (N = A − Z). In
in binding energies of the shells. The radiation may addition, since the number of protons (Z) defines an
take on two different forms: characteristic x-ray or element, as does its chemical symbol (X), only one is
Auger (oh-zhay) effect. necessary; hence, Z is often omitted as well.
Example: Binding energy for a hypothetical “K” The total mass of an atom is essentially the com-
shell = 100 keV and “L” = 50 keV. K100 − L50 = bined masses of the nucleons. Electrons contribute
50 keV of energy released as the electron moves from less than 1% to the total mass.1
the “L” shell to the “K” shell. Nuclides having the same number of protons (Z)
Characteristic x-rays are electromagnetic radiations are called isotopes. Isotopes are the same element, but
(photons) that are created when an outer shell electron have different atomic masses (A) and therefore have
moves to fill an inner shell vacancy. This vacancy may different numbers of neutrons (N); for example: 125 53I72 ,
127 131
occur for several reasons—to be discussed later. The I
53 74 , and I
53 78 . Nuclides with the same number of
energy of this photon is equal to the difference between neutrons (N) are called isotones and will be differ-
binding energies. Since binding energies are deter- ent elements, since the number of protons (Z) will
132
mined by, or characteristic of, the number of protons in be different; for example: 131 133
53I78 , 54 Xe78 , and 55Cs 78.
the nucleus, and it is the number of protons that deter- Nuclides with the same atomic mass number (A)
mines an element’s identity, the characteristic x-ray are called isobars and are different elements as well,
energies are specific to each element and the electron since they will have different numbers of protons (Z)
99
shells from which they originate. X-radiation is defined and neutrons (N); for example: 99 42 Mo57 and 43Tc56.
as an electromagnetic radiation originating outside the Finally, nuclides with the same number of protons
nucleus, therefore the term characteristic x-ray. (Z) and neutrons (N), but in different energy states
The Auger effect occurs under the same condi- are called isomers; for example: 99m 99
43Tc and 43Tc. An
tions as characteristic x-ray, that is, an inner shell easy mnemonic for remembering this is that isotopes
vacancy being filled by an outer shell electron. The (with a p) have the same number of protons, isotones
difference is that the excess energy from the cas- (with an n) have the same number of neutrons, iso-
cading electron is radiated to another electron. This bars (with an a) have the same atomic number, and
ejects that electron from its shell. This free electron isomers (with an e) are the same nuclide with differ-
will have kinetic energy equal to the difference in the ent energies.
binding energies less the binding energy of the shell Isotopes having different N numbers are of par-
of the free electron. The Auger effect is more com- ticular interest to imagers because they have the same
mon in elements with lower numbers of protons chemistry, since their Z numbers and, therefore, elec-
(Z number).1–3 tron numbers are the same.1–5 Some isotopes exhibit
the emission of radiations, which is due to the dif-
▶▶Nuclear Structure ferences in the number of neutrons. These isotopes
are called unstable. If all the stable isotopes of all
The nucleus is composed mainly of neutrons and elements are plotted, comparing proton number to
protons. Any particle contributing to the structure neutron number, a pattern emerges as illustrated in
of the nucleus is called a nucleon. The conventional Figure 1-3.
nomenclature to describe the nucleons is: AZ X N . Elements with low Z numbers have proton to
neutron ratios that are 1:1. As Z numbers increase,
where:
this ratio increases to as high as 1.5. This distribu-
X = Symbol of the chemical element tion of stable elements is called the line of stability.
A (Atomic mass number) = Total number of nucle By definition, an element with a proton to neutron
ons = # Protons + # Neutrons ratio that falls to either the left or right of the line of
60
cardiology.1,2
Z
=
40
N β− Decay
Proton-rich
zone In an unstable nuclear configuration where the
20 nucleus is neutron rich, β− decay occurs. To decrease
the neutron–proton ratio, a neutron is converted to
0 a proton and an energized electron is emitted. The
0 20 40 60 80 100 expression of this nuclear transition is:
Atomic number (Z)
FIGURE 1-3 Line of stability. All naturally occurring stable n → p + e− + ν + energy
nuclides fall along a distribution known as the line of stability
(LOS). As illustrated, for light elements (Z < 20) N ~ Z and for
heavier elements N ~ 1.5Z. Unstable elements, lying to the left where n is the neutron, p the proton, e the electron,
of the LOS, are neutron rich; those lying to the right of the LOS and ν is the neutrino.
are proton rich. The neutrino (ν) behaves like a particle with no
mass and is not critical to imaging considerations.
The primary emission is the energized electron (e−).
stability is unstable. The unstable isotopes, radioiso- The nuclear configuration that results from β− decay
topes, are unstable because their nuclear configura- is a daughter with a stable or more stable energy state
tions are either proton rich or neutron rich relative and an additional proton in its nucleus.
to stable configurations. These radioactive elements Example: 146C 8 → 147 N7
seek stability by undergoing transformations in their
nuclear configurations to a more stable P ↔ N ratio. Since the number of protons is changed, the ele-
The type of transformation will be a result of the mental identity changes. This is called a transmuta-
P ↔ N ratio, that is, proton rich versus neutron rich. tion. The daughter atomic mass (A) remains the same
This type of transition is called the mode of decay.1–4 as the parent nucleus, and the energy carried off by
the ejected electron is called transition energy. This
Modes of Decay leads to a more balanced relationship of coulom-
bic force (repelling forces due to the protons) and
The goal of nuclear decay is to equate the balance of exchange force (attractive nuclear forces). The result-
forces in the nucleus. The repelling forces originat- ing emission of the energized electron, a β− particle,
ing from the positive charge (coulombic forces) of the is of no use in imaging and contributes to an increase
protons, when matched by the attractive forces from in radiation dose in a biologic system. This decay pro-
within the nucleus (exchange forces), define stability. cess may lead to a daughter that is not fully stable, but
When these forces are mismatched, nuclear trans- more stable than the parent.1,2 The change in nuclear
formations (radioactive decay) result. The mode of configuration is an increase in Z and a decrease in N.
decay will produce unique emissions and lead to a
more stable nuclear configuration. In radionuclide β+ Decay
imaging, the ideal mode of decay would result in a
high yield of photons, at an energy that is efficiently In nuclear configurations where the parent is proton
detected by our imaging instrumentation. Photon rich, β+ decay may occur. In this mode of decay, a
emission is also desirable from the radiation safety proton is converted to a neutron and the emission of
an energized, positively charged electron (β+) results. daughter, since the nuclear transition occurred prior
The nuclear equation is: to the production of the x-rays and Auger electrons.
It is the characteristic x-rays that are imaged in 201Tl
p → n + e+ + ν + energy myocardial perfusion imaging. The energy of the
x-rays is determined by the binding energy of 201Hg,
The energy of the β+ particle contributes to the daughter of the decay of 201Tl. Electron capture
resolving the transition energy between the unstable decreases the proton–neutron ratio.1
parent and more stable daughter, as in β− decay.
Example: 20181Tl120 → 201
80 Hg121
An important secondary emission will result
from the formation of the β+ particle. Since there
is an abundance of negatively charged electrons in Isomeric Transitions and Internal Conversions
nature, the resulting positively charged electron (β+)
will be attracted to, and collide with, a free negatively The daughter of the decay of a radioactive parent
charged electron. This collision results in the anni- will ideally be in its most stable energy configuration
hilation of both particles. The annihilation leads to or ground state. This does not always occur, leading
the conversion of the mass of these particles to their to either of the two unstable states: excited state or
equivalent energy state. This is expressed by Einstein’s metastable state. Excited states are very unstable and
equation E = mc 2, where E is energy, m the mass, exist for very short time periods, usually less than
and c is the speed of light. This essentially states that 10−12 seconds. Metastable states, however, may exist
energy and mass are simply two physical forms of the for several hours. These metastable states lead to
same thing. Therefore, two photons (E) are emitted, the release of energy in the form of electromagnetic
each with the energy equivalent to the mass (m) of an emissions, without changing the proton–neutron
electron, which is 511 keV. Unique to this annihila- ratios. The daughter nucleus has the same nuclear
tion is that these photons are emitted in a 180-degree structure as the parent has, but in a more stable
trajectory from each other. It is these photons that energy configuration. This form of decay is called
are detected and registered into an image in positron an isomeric transition and results in electromagnetic
imaging, such as with 82Rb. The change in nuclear emissions called γ-rays. These emissions are the same
configuration is a decrease in Z and an increase in N. as x-rays, differing only by their location of origin,
82 82 that is, the nucleus. As noted with the production of
Example: 37 Rb45 → 36 Kr46
characteristic x-rays, there is a competing process,
resulting in a particulate radiation. This process is
Electron Capture called internal conversion. For any given metastable
state, there is a specific ratio of isomeric transitions to
An alternative to β+ decay in proton-rich nuclear internal conversions. In imaging, the higher percent-
configuration is electron capture. This mode of decay age of isomeric transitions compared to internal con-
is defined as the capture of a K-shell electron by the versions is preferred due to the resulting higher yield
nucleus, the subsequent combination with a proton, of photons. The decay of 99mTc to 99Tc is an example of
and creation of a neutron. The nuclear expression is an isomeric transition of the metastable state (99mTc).
therefore: The percent occurrence of isomeric transitions of a
population of 99mTc nuclei is approximately 87%. For
p + e- → n + ν + energy example, for every 100 decays of 99mTc nuclei, there
is a yield of 87 γ-photons and 13 internal conversion
The vacancy left by the captured electron would electrons.
then be filled by an outer shell electron. A cascade For any given mode of decay, should the daughter
of an electron, filling subsequent vacancies, cre- be metastable, there will be the emission of γ-photons
ates secondary emissions called characteristic x-rays and internal conversion electrons as secondary emis-
and Auger electrons. The energies of these emissions sions. This will be indicated as [B−, γ], [B+, γ], [EC,
will be characteristic of the binding energy of the γ], and so forth. The internal conversion electron
Energy
Z−2 β+
most probable mode of decay is α decay. An alpha
A
particle consists of two protons and two neurons, D2 EC IT
A
which is essentially a helium nucleus. Alpha decay Z−1 (electron D4 (isomeric
results in a daughter with a Z number of 2 less than A capture) Z + 1 transition)
the parent and an atomic mass less by 4 relative to D3
Z−1
the parent.
Example: 235
92 U143 →
231
90Th141 Z−2 Z−1 Z Z+1
Atomic number
Due to its high charges and heavy mass, the alpha
FIGURE 1-4 Decay schemes. This figure illustrates the
particle has a very short travel distance in matter and configurations of decay schemes for the different modes
deposits its energy very quickly. It has no application of decay. The schemes move to the left for proton-rich
in diagnostic imaging and induces significant poten- radionuclides and to the right for neutron-rich radionuclides.
tial for biologic damage.1,3
Decay Schemes
Parent–Daughter Equilibrium
The modes of decay may be expressed graphically,
called decay schemes. Decay schemes graphically Not all nuclear transitions lead to a stable daughter.
illustrate all possible nuclear transitions that unstable The β− decay of 99Mo yields 99mTc, which then decays
nuclei undergo. They are often accompanied by tables to 99Tc by isomeric transitions and internal conversions.
99m
with detailed information about the transitions, such Tc decays to 99Tc with an 87% frequency through
as the percentage occurrence, isomeric transitions, isomeric transitions. Therefore, for every 100 decays
internal conversions, characteristic x-rays, Auger of 99mTc, we observe 87 γ-rays and 13 internal con-
electrons, and biologic dose information. version electrons, as stated earlier. This higher yield
In decay schemes, the nuclear energy levels are of photons makes 99mTc a very desirable radionuclide
expressed as horizontal lines. The space between for imaging. A sample of 99Mo would always contain
these lines represents the transition energy (Q). some proportion of 99mTc and 99Tc. Since both par-
The types of emissions are depicted by a unique ent and daughter are decaying, the relative activities
direction of a line (Fig. 1-4). would reach equilibrium, based on their half-lives.
Note that the arrows may be angled to either These states of equilibrium are employed when using
the right or left. In neutron-rich parents, the mode both technetium and rubidium generators. When
of decay “shifts” the daughter to the right, corre- the parent half-life is marginally longer than that
sponding to the shift on to the line of stability graph. of the daughter, the amount of the daughter in the
Conversely, a mode of decay for a proton-rich parent mixture will reach a maximum over a period of time.
moves to the left, toward the line of stability. That elapsed time will be a multiple of half-lives of
The tables that accompany decay schemes provide the daughter. If the daughter radionuclide is removed
additional detail including the secondary emissions, from the mixture, the same multiple of half-lives will
as mentioned earlier. Since many of the secondary have to occur, before the maximum amount of the
emissions are particulate, that is, electrons, these daughter is subsequently reached. This equilibrium
data are of particular interest in radiation dosimetry. state is called transient equilibrium.2,4 It is this tran-
In the decay scheme for 201Tl, the data regarding the sient state that is the basis of 99mTc production from
99
characteristic x-rays of 201Hg are in these tables. Mo–99mTc generators (Fig. 1-5).
Parent
Parent
Daughter
Activity
Activity
Daughter
1 2 3 4 Time
1 2 3 4 Time 7 8 9 10
(Number of daughter half-lives)
(Number of daughter half-lives)
FIGURE 1-5 Transient equilibrium. When the parent half-life FIGURE 1-6 Secular equilibrium. When the parent half-life
is marginally longer than that of the daughter, the amount of is considerably longer than that of the daughter, the amount
daughter activity will reach a maximum after relatively few of parent activity will decrease very little over time. Therefore,
daughter half-lives have passed. 99Mo and 99mTc typically reach many more daughter half-lives must pass before the equilibrium
transient equilibrium after approximately four 99mTc half-lives. is reached. An example is 82Sr with a half-life of 25 days and
82
Rb with a 1.2-minute half-life.
In parent–daughter mixtures where the half- radioactive nuclei and λ the decay constant. Since the
life of the parent is markedly longer than that of the total N decreases with time (t), the decay constant (λ)
daughter, secular equilibrium is reached. In this state is a negative value.1,2,4 The number of transitions per
of equilibrium, the concentration of the parent is unit time (∆N/∆t) is called activity. Activity is mea-
decreasing so slowly relative to the daughter that the sured in curies (Ci), which is defined as 3.7 × 1010
mixture appears to have the half-life of the parent. It disintegrations per second (dps). The International
is this equilibrium that is the basis for the 82Sr–82Rb System of Units (SI) unit equivalent is the bec-
generators used in 82Rb positron emission tomogra- querel (Bq), which is defined as 1 Bq = 1 dps. So
phy (PET) imaging (Fig. 1-6).1 1 Ci = 3.7 × 1010 Bq. The most commonly used units
are in the mCi (MBq) range for nuclear cardiology
RADIOACTIVITY procedures.
In nuclear decay, the number of radioactive
The specific time that an unstable nucleus will nuclei (N) is always decreasing as time passes at an
undergo a transition cannot be determined, only average rate defined by the decay constant (λ). Decay
predicted. Nuclear transitions are spontaneous and is expressed, therefore, as an exponential function;
random, so the mathematics of radioactive decay is that is, the number of radioactive nuclei available is
based on probabilities and rates, not specific nuclear affected by both the number of unstable nuclei and its
events. If a population of radioactive atoms, N, is average rate of decay. To calculate the specific num-
considered, the rate of nuclear transitions would be ber of decays for a given time, we have the following
expressed as ∆N/∆t. The rate implies that a constant expression:
would express the average number of transitions that
occur per unit time. This constant is called the decay N (t) = N (0) e−λt
constant; which is specific to a given radionuclide
and is expressed as λ. The mathematical relationship where N(t) is the number of unstable nuclei remaining
is: ∆N/∆t = −λN, where N is the total number of after the elapsed time (t) has passed. The expression
e−λt is called the decay factor (DF) and is unique to the the past, the precalibrated value. In this case, the DF
time (t) and the decay constant (λ). The “e” is the base would be the reciprocal of the elapsed time DF1,2:
of natural logs, which is 2.718, so, when raised to the
power of −λt, it determines the specific fraction of 1
DF =
remaining radioactive nuclei after time (t) has elapsed. 0.817
When the elapsed time (t) is the time required DF = 1.22
for half of the total number of radioactive nuclei to
decay, it is termed the half-life. Half-life (T1/2) and the So, we have:
decay constant (λ) are related as:
A(0) = (24.51)(1.22) = 30 mCi
ln 2
T1/2 =
λ
particles that are electrons, are produced. Particles, and mass, will lose its energy over a longer path
either β or α, interact with matter through electri- length, and is thus characterized as a low LET par-
cal collisions. These collisions result in excitation, ticle. The LET may also be expressed in terms of the
ionization, or bremsstrahlung. In excitation, energy relative number of ionizations that is produced. This
from the incident particle is transferred to an outer is termed specific ionization. Particles with a high LET
shell electron. The electron is energized but does not have high SI values; particles with a low LET have low
exceed its binding energy. That increased energy is SI values. LET and SI characteristics have profound
dissipated generally as heat radiation. Excitation is a impact on the type of damage done to tissue.
low-energy interaction.
A higher-energy interaction occurs when the ▶▶Photon Interactions with Matter
incident particle transfers enough energy to exceed
the binding energy of the electron. An ion pair, an The interactions of photons in matter are energy-
energized free electron and a positive ion, results. degrading processes, just as in particle interactions.
These ionizing interactions represent higher-energy There are three mechanisms of photon interaction
level interactions and contribute to the specific expo- in matter: photoelectric absorption, Compton scatter,
sure rate when applied to tissue, discussed in detail and pair production. The probability of occurrence
in a later chapter. for each of these mechanisms is a function of the
The third type of particulate interaction results energy of the photon and the atomic number of the
when the incident particle penetrates the electron matter (Fig. 1-7).
cloud and interacts with the charge field of the Photoelectric absorption occurs when the photon
nucleus. The trajectory of the incident particle is transfers all of its energy to an inner shell electron.
markedly changed, resulting in a decrease in veloc- The photon is completely absorbed and the electron,
ity. The decrease in velocity represents an energy loss. called a photoelectron, is ejected from its shell. The
That energy loss produces photons of x-rays called energy of the photoelectron is equal to the incident
bremsstrahlung, German for breaking radiation. photon energy, minus the binding energy of its shell.
Bremsstrahlung interactions are high-energy inter- It is key to remember that the photon no longer exists
actions more typical of high-energy particles inter- (it has been absorbed) and its energy is converted
acting with high Z number matter.
Since any of these interactions may lead to par- 100
tial dissipation of the energy of the incident particle,
multiple interactions are required for the full energy
of the particle to be absorbed in matter. These multi- Photoelectric Pair
75
ple interactions occur along a path that is determined absorption production
by the energy, charge, and mass of the particle, as well
Atomic number
from electromagnetic energy to kinetic energy of the medium-energy photons, interacting in matter with
photoelectron. The kinetic energy of the photoelec- low atomic masses. This is of particular interest in
tron is dissipated by the mechanisms previously dis- imaging, since it is the most probable interaction of
201
cussed: excitation, ionization, and bremsstrahlung. Tl (Hg x-rays) and 99mTc γ-rays in tissues. As the
The vacancy left by the ejected electron is quickly photons are scattered, not absorbed, they still exist,
filled by an outer shell electron. Characteristic x-rays but have lost their association with the point of origin
and Auger electrons are then emitted, as described through the scattering process. These photons are the
earlier. Photoelectric absorption is most probable source of image degradation, but can be identified by
in interactions of low- to medium-energy photons their lower-energy values. The identification of these
in matter with high atomic numbers. Photoelectric photons and their rejection from an image are critical
absorption is what makes gamma camera photo- functions of imaging equipment.1–5
multiplier tubes (PMTs) possible. The third interaction of photons in matter is pair
The second mode of interaction is Compton scat- production. High-energy photons may completely
ter. It occurs when a photon interacts with an outer avoid interacting with orbital electrons and interact
shell electron, that is, an electron with low binding in the magnetic field of the nucleus. This interaction
energy. Contrary to photoelectric absorption, the results in the creation of a pair of electrons, one posi-
photon is not completely absorbed. It transfers a tive and one negative. The positive electron imme-
portion of its energy to the electron, which is subse- diately combines with a negative electron, creating
quently ejected, and called a Compton electron. The two 511-keV annihilation photons. The energy of
resultant Compton scattered photon is in an energy- the incident photon must be at least two times the
degraded state and in an altered trajectory relative mass energy equivalency of an electron (511 keV) or
to the incident photon. The angle of the scattered 1.022 MeV. Since energies in this range are not used
photon is related to the amount of energy transferred in imaging, pair production is not relevant to this
to the electron. The greater the amount of energy discussion.2
transferred to the electron, the greater the angle of These three mechanisms are illustrated in
scatter. Compton scatter is most probable in low- to Figure 1-8.
γ Photon
Compton electron
γ Photon γ Photon
Photoelectron
Annihilation photon
e+
e–
Annihilation photon
A B C
FIGURE 1-8 (A) Photoelectric absorption. All photon energy is transferred to the ejected photoelectron. (B) Compton scatter. Partial
energy transfer, incident photon scattered by angle θ. (C) Pair production. Photon converts to an electron pair (β−, β+); annihilation
photon results.
Table 1-1
Half-Value Thickness for Tl, Tc, and Rb
Half-Value Thickness (mm)
201 99m 82
Matter Z Number Tl (80 keV) Tc (140 keV) Rb (511 keV)
Pb 82 0.25 0.30 3.80
Tissue (H2O) 8 38.0 46.0 73.0
Nal 53 0.67 2.40 21.0
■■ Important concepts used to describe radia- The Health Physics Society defines radiation as
tion include exposure, absorbed dose, and “energy that comes from a source and travels through
dose equivalent. space.”1 Radiation can be atomic particles such as
alpha and beta emissions, as well as electromagnetic
■■ A relatable way of explaining the radiation
energy associated with radio, microwaves, radar, vis-
dose from medical procedures to patients is
ible light, ultraviolet light, x-rays, and gamma rays. If
to compare the dose to the reference dose,
the radiation has enough energy to remove an elec-
the yearly radiation exposure from natural
tron from an atom, creating an ion, it is termed ion-
sources.
izing radiation.2 Ionizing radiation includes x-rays,
■■ Institutions must maintain radiation levels gamma rays, and alpha and beta particles and can
consistent with the As Low As Reasonably lead to biological damage by depositing energy in
Achievable (ALARA) philosophy. living tissue, breaking molecular bonds.
■■ Deleterious effects of radiation are classi- This chapter will introduce units that describe
fied as either stochastic, where the prob- radiation, sources of radiation exposure, radiation
ability of occurrence increases with dose, dose limits and introduce radiation biology. The
or deterministic, in which the severity chapter will further focus on radiation safety and
increases with dose after a threshold is protection regulations pertinent to the practice of
exceeded. nuclear cardiology. In the United States of America
■■ Major factors in limiting dose are time, dis- (USA), these regulations are governed by the Nuclear
tance, and shielding. Regulatory Commission (NRC) and are found in
■■ Regulatory agencies, such as the Nuclear Title 10, Parts 19, 20, and 35 of the Code of Federal
Regulatory Commission (or state agencies Regulations (CFR). Most states in the USA are agree-
ment states, meaning that they have an agreement
in Agreement States), regulate the use of
with the NRC to regulate the use of radioactive
radioactive materials including transporta-
materials within the state. Agreement state regula-
tion, handling, disposal, personnel moni-
tions have to be at least as strict as NRC regulations.
toring, and medical use.
NRC NUREG 1556 Volume 9, Revision 3 provides
Table 2-2
Units of Radiation Exposure and Dose
Quantity Classical Unit International Unit (SI) Relationship
Exposure (in air) Roentgen (R) C/kg 1 R = 2.58 × 10−4 C/kg
Dose (in tissue) Radiation absorbed dose Gray (Gy) 1 Gy = 100 rad
(Rad = R × f) 1 mGy = 0.1 rad
Dose equivalent Roentgen equivalent in man Sievert (Sv) 1 Sv = 100 rem
(risk adjusted dose) (Rem = Rad × QF) 1 mSv = 0.1 rem
Medical Procedures
36.0%
FIGURE 2-1 Radiation exposure sources in the United States. The U.S. population receives approximately 620 mrem (6.2 mSv)
annually, with ~50% from manmade sources (medical procedures, nuclear medicine, and consumer products) and ~50% from
background radiation. Data from NCRP Publications. NCRP Report No 160 (2015). Copyright © 2021 National Council on Radiation
Protection and Measurements. All Rights Reserved. https://ncrponline.org/publications/reports/ncrp-report-160-2/.
and stars, as well as in our own body.7 This ubiqui- x-rays and nuclear medicine procedures.9 The effec-
tous background radiation in the United States totals tive radiation dose from these sources is about equal
approximately 3.1 mSv/yr across the population.8 to that of natural sources and accounts for an addi-
Exposure to Radon and its decay products accounts tional 3.1 mSv/yr (Fig. 2-1). It is important to note
for the majority of the natural background radiation. that these estimates are population based and not all
In addition to natural background, people are individuals are exposed to radiation from manufac-
exposed to radiation in manufactured products such tured products and radiological examinations.
as smoke detectors, ceramics, and building materials, A convenient and relatable way of explaining the
as well as from medical sources including diagnostic radiation dose from medical procedures to patients
Table 2-3
Effective Radiation Dose from Common Examinations in Terms of Background Radiation
Single Procedure Stress/Rest
Administered Reference Reference
Examination Activity Estimated Dose Level Estimated Dose Level
201
Tl 148 MBq (4 mCi) 20.72 mSv (2.07 rem) 6.91 20.72 mSv (2.07 rem) 6.91
99m
Tc-tetrofosmin 296 MBq (8 mCi) 2.04 mSv (0.20 rem) 0.68
stress only
99m
Tc-tetrofosmin 888 MBq (24 mCi) 6.13 mSv (0.61 rem) 2.04
stress
99m
Tc-tetrofosmin 296 MBq (8 mCi) 2.04 mSv (0.20 rem) 0.68 8.17 mSv (0.82 rem) 2.72
rest
99m
Tc-sestamibi 296 MBq (8 mCi) 2.66 mSv (0.27 rem) 0.89
stress only
99m
Tc-sestamibi 888 MBq (24 mCi) 7.99 mSv (0.80 rem) 2.66
stress
99m
Tc-sestamibi 296 MBq (8 mCi) 2.34 mSv (0.23 rem) 0.78 10.33 mSv (1.03 rem) 3.44
rest
82
Rb rest or stress 1480 MBq (40 mCi) 2.52 mSv (0.25 rem) 0.84 5.03 mSv (0.50 rem) 1.68
13
N-ammonia rest 740 MBq (20 mCi) 2.00 mSv (0.20 rem) 0.67 4.00 mSv (0.40 rem) 1.33
or stress
Notes:
Reference level = Effective dose/ Yearly background dose
Dose levels for procedures data from Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Skali H, et al. Approaches to reducing radiation dose from radionuclide myocardial
perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(4):592–599.
is to express the dose in terms of the yearly exposure of stress-only protocols may also be used to reduce
from natural sources.10 This is often called the refer- radiation dose. In this scenario, the stress imaging is
ence dose but may also be called by other expressions, done first and rest imaging is only performed if the
such as BERT (Background Equivalent Radiation stress image is read as abnormal.13,14
Time).11,12 Table 2-3 shows the estimated radiation
doses to patients from common nuclear cardiology
procedures and their associated reference levels. RADIATION DOSE LIMITS AND
The dose levels in Table 2-3 also illustrate the INVESTIGATIONAL LEVELS
radiation dose differences in procedures that have
led the leadership of the nuclear cardiology com- The regulations for dose limits in the United States
munity to recommend dose reduction by utilization can be found in Title 10, Part 20 of the CFR (10 CFR
of shorter half-life radiopharmaceuticals for single- 20). Table 2-4 illustrates these limits, which include
photon emission computed tomography myocar- maximum radiation dose to occupational workers, the
dial perfusion imaging (MPI) (99mTc preferred over embryo/fetus of an occupational worker, and the pub-
201
Tl). Where positron emission tomography MPI lic. Both occupational and public dose limits exclude
imaging is available, either 13N-ammonia or 82Rb will exposure to natural background radiation and radiation
result in a lower radiation dose to the patient. Use from an individual’s own medical procedures.
Table 2-4
Radiation Dose Limits in the United States
Area Dose Limit
Occupational worker 0.05 Sv (5 rem) per year
Whole-body total effective dose
Occupational worker 0.15 Sv (15 rem) per year
Lens of the eye
Occupational worker 0.5 Sv (50 rem) per year
Shallow dose to skin or extremity
Embryo/fetus of a declared pregnant 5 mSv (0.5 rem) over the gestation period
Occupational worker
Individual member of the public 1 mSv (0.1 rem) per year
Individual member of the public—special circumstance 5 mSv (0.5 rem) per year
Data from Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR §20.1201–1208, 1301. (2020).
Table 2-5
ALARA Investigational Levels3
ALARA ALARA
Investigational Level I Investigational Level II
Area (Per Calendar Quarter) (Per Calendar Quarter)
Whole body 1.25 mSv (125 mrem) 3.75 mSv (375 mrem)
Extremity and skin 12.5 mSv (1250 mrem) 37.5 mSv (3750 mrem)
Lens of the eye 3.75 mSv (375 mrem) 11.25 mSv (1125 mrem)
While the dose limit to the public from sources to maintain radiation levels consistent with the As Low
of ionizing radiation is 1 mSv (0.1 rem) per year, this As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) philosophy. These
limit may be increased to 5 mSv (0.5 rem) from an quarterly investigational levels may be established by
infrequent exposure related to another person’s med- the institution, or the facility may adopt those recom-
ical procedure providing the authorized user deter- mended by the NRC. As illustrated in Table 2-5, there
mines the exposure is appropriate. are two investigational levels associated with various
Because it is impractical to set occupational worker monitoring points on the body. An ALARA Level I is
dose limits to that of the public, regulators rely on the a dose equal to 10% of the annual dose limit, whereas
Linear Non-Threshold risk model to set limits at a point an ALARA Level II is triggered at 30% of the annual
below which the threshold for radiation effects are dose limit. To help ensure annual dose limits are not
known and at a point to minimize the theoretical effects exceeded, these ALARA investigational levels are rou-
from low levels of ionizing radiation exposure. The dose tinely checked on a quarterly basis.3
limits are established at levels of risk already assumed The NRC recommends that the following actions
by occupational workers.15 To this point, radiation dose must be taken when an employee exceeds ALARA
limits are established at a level where the risk of a fatal investigational levels:
cancer from occupational exposure to ionizing radia-
tion is similar to the assumed risk of a fatal work acci- ▶▶ALARA I Exceeded
dent, which is 1 in 10,000 annually.16
In addition to ensuring dose limits are not exceeded, The RSO or designee should investigate and review
an institution must adopt investigational levels in order actions that might be taken to reduce a recurrence.
No further action is necessary unless determined nuclear cardiology are not addressed in the regula-
otherwise by the RSO. tory guide, the recommendation for most Tc-99m-
based radiopharmaceuticals is to stop breast feeding
▶▶ALARA II Exceeded for 24 hours. No interruption is recommended for
N-13, O-15, and Rb-82, while a 4-hour interruption
The RSO should perform a timely investigation into is specified for F-18 FDG. Tl-201, on the other hand,
the cause, take action to reduce the recurrence, and calls for a 4-day suspension of breast feeding and
submit a report to the institution’s Radiation Safety clinical doses mandate that written instructions be
Committee. given to the mother.18
Probability Severity
Stochastic Deterministic
effects effects
are heightened by the type of radiation. X-rays and cellular DNA. This may leave the cell modified yet
gamma rays are high-energy quanta of electromag- still viable.16
netic radiation characterized by short wavelengths
and high frequencies that have the ability to ionize
an exposed atom. The biological effectiveness, or the RADIATION PROTECTION PRINCIPLES
risk adjusted for radiation quality, for x-rays, gamma
rays, and beta particles is the same (Table 2-1). On Occupational workers exposed to ionizing radiation
the other hand, alpha emissions are high-energy must practice radiation safety techniques on a daily
particulate radiation that deposits significantly more basis to maintain levels of exposure below federal
energy as it passes through tissue. Because of this dose limits. To assess the levels of cumulative expo-
increased transfer of energy, alpha particles bear a sure, occupational workers are issued personal radia-
higher biological risk than x-rays, gamma rays, and tion monitors. When a pregnant worker declares her
beta particles. At equivalent doses of radiation, the pregnancy status, an additional monitor is provided
associated biological risk from alpha emissions is to be worn at the waist level for assessing the radia-
20 times that of x-rays, gamma rays, and beta particles. tion dose to the fetus.
When exposed to radiation, cells can be affected Over and above the universal precautions common
directly by energy deposited into the atom/molecule to the healthcare environment, there are three cardinal
or indirectly through ionization of the surround- rules in the protection against ionizing radiation. These
ing medium, which then interacts with the target are time, distance, and shielding (Fig. 2-3).24
cells. Whether directly or indirectly via free radical
production in cellular water, the toxic effects from ▶▶Time
radiation exposure include the removal of an elec-
tron from DNA molecules causing single- or double- Radiation is emitted as a rate. A radiation source
strand breaks. Double DNA strand breaks are overly emitting photons or particles at a rate of 80 mGy/hr
traumatic and often lead to cellular death. Although would expose a particular area to 80 mGy in 1 hour.
single-strand breaks frequently repair themselves Understanding this principle, occupational workers
correctly, incorrect or mutagenic repairs do occur. limit their time around known radiation sources,
A mutagenic repair represents a change in the which in turn limits their cumulative exposure. In
Spending less time near source Increasing distance from source Increased shielding
lessens radiation exposure lessens radiation exposure lessens radiation exposure
A B C
FIGURE 2-3 Principles of radiation protection. From http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation/protects-you/protection-principles.html.
The three rules for protection from radiation are (A) reduce your time around a source, (B) increase your distance from the source,
and (C) use appropriate shielding devices.
the example given above, a worker exposed to an radiation source and strength. Concrete and lead of var-
80-mGy/hr source would only receive 40 mGy of ious thicknesses are commonly used in barriers to pro-
exposure if his or her time around the source were vide structural protection to occupational workers and
limited to 30 minutes. the general public. Partial barriers, lead-lined transport
containers, and lead-lined syringe shields are also used
▶▶Distance to protect radioisotope workers during the preparation
and administration of radiopharmaceuticals.
Like a source of visible light that appears dimmer at
increased distances, ionizing radiation decreases in PERSONNEL MONITORING
intensity as well. The inverse square law states that the
intensity of radiation decreases with the inverse of the Occupational radiation workers are required to be
square of the distance, or I1(d1)2 = I2(d2)2, where I = monitored for radiation exposure if they are likely
intensity and d = distance. Radiation is emitted in an to enter a high or very high radiation area, are likely
isotropic manner. As distance increases, the same flux of to exceed 10% of the annual dose limits, or are a
radiation covers a larger surface area, thereby decreas- declared pregnant woman likely to receive an annual
ing the exposure to a finite object in the path (Fig. 2-4). dose in excess of 1 mSv (0.1 rem).25
Continuing the previous example, a worker exposed to There are several types of personnel monitors
40 mGy at 1 meter from a radiation source will reduce used in nuclear cardiology facilities. These include the
their exposure to 10 mGy at a distance of 2 meter. film badge, a thermo luminescent dosimeter (TLD),
Example: and an optically stimulated luminescence (OSL)
device. The NRC requires evaluation of these devices
by a laboratory that is accredited by the National
I1 × (d1)2 = I2 × (d 2)2
Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
40 mGy × (1 m)2 = I2 × (2 m)2 Film badges utilize a strip of photographic film
40 mGy = I2 × 4 contained in a plastic holder. Exposure to radiation
will increase the darkening in the developed film. The
I2 = 10 mGy
degree of darkening is proportional to the radiation
exposure received. Incorporated into the badge holder
▶▶Shielding are filters such as lead, copper, aluminum, and plastic.
The degree of darkening behind each filter helps deter-
Shielding is often used to provide a protective barrier mine the quality of the radiation received, such as high-
between a worker and a radiation source. The shield- energy photons, low-energy photons, and particulate
ing material and thickness are dependent upon the radiation. Film badges are commonly used to measure
I1(d1)2 = I2(d2)2
radiation area sign is not needed if the source of the 2. Prevent the spread of contamination by covering the
exposure is from a patient meeting the criteria to be spill with absorbent paper labeled “caution radioac-
released into the public. tive material,” but do not attempt to clean it up.
3. Shield the source if possible. Do this only if it can
AREA SURVEYS AND SPILL PROCEDURES be done without further contamination or a sig-
nificant increase in radiation exposure.
Ambient radiation level surveys must be performed 4. Close the room and lock or otherwise secure the
at the end of each working day in areas where radio- area to prevent entry.
active materials are used and stored. The most com- 5. Notify the RSO immediately.
mon instrument for performing ambient radiation 6. Decontaminate personnel by removing contami-
surveys in the Nuclear Cardiology department is nated clothing and flushing contaminated skin
the Geiger–Müller (GM) meter, a gas-filled detector with lukewarm water, and then washing with mild
that produces and collects ion pairs when ionizing soap. If contamination remains, the RSO may
radiation passes through the detector and deposits consider inducing perspiration. Then wash the
energy. The NRC recommends an ambient expo- affected area again to remove any contamination
sure trigger limit of 5 mR/hr in restricted areas and that was released by the perspiration.
0.1 mR/hr in unrestricted areas.3
Removable contamination surveys (wipe tests) WASTE DISPOSAL
should be performed weekly using an appropriate
gamma-counting device such as a sodium iodide (NaI) Radioactive waste generated in the Nuclear Cardio
well counter. While Appendix R of NRC NUREG logy department may be disposed by various meth-
1556 Volume 93 suggests an action level of 20,000 ods. The two most common are decay-in-storage and
disintegrations per minute (dpm)/100 cm2 for 99mTc return to an authorized recipient. Decay-in-storage
and 201Tl, many nuclear cardiology facilities use the is allowed for isotopes with a half-life of 120 days or
2000 dpm/100 cm2 action level required for other iso- less.30 Storage of waste for decay requires that the
topes common in general nuclear medicine depart- waste to be held for a minimum of 10 half-lives in
ments. It is also important to verify ambient radiation a shielded container and prior to final disposal the
and contamination limits in your individual area of prac- waste must be surveyed to ensure it is consistent with
tice as many states have more restrictive requirements. background radiation. All radioactive labels must be
When ambient radiation levels or contamination removed or defaced, and a record of the waste dis-
surveys exceed limits, a radiation spill has occurred posal must be maintained for 3 years. A summary of
requiring action. The NRC recommends establishing an the minimum length of time radioactive waste must
activity threshold for a major and minor spill and pro- be held in storage for isotopes common to nuclear
vides guidance in Appendix N of NRC NUREG 1556 cardiology is summarized in Table 2-6.
Volume 9.3 The suggested procedures are as follows:
Minor Spill (less than 100 mCi of 99mTc/201Tl)
1. Notify persons in the area that a spill has occurred.
2. Prevent the spread of contamination by covering Table 2-6
the spill with absorbent paper. Minimum Time Required for Decay-in-Storage
3. Wear gloves and protective clothing and clean up Minimum Time in
the spill using absorbent paper. Isotope Half-Life Storage (10 half-lives)
4. Survey the area with appropriate radiation detec-
99m
tion instruments. Tc 6.01 hours 60.1 hours
5. Report the incident to the RSO. 201
Tl 72.9 hours 30.4 days
18
Major Spill (greater than 100 mCi of 99m 201
Tc/ Tl) F 1.83 hours 18.3 hours
13
N 9.96 minutes 1.7 hours
1. Clear the area. Notify all persons not involved in 82
R 1.3 minute 13 minutes
the spill to vacate the room.
FIGURE 2-6 DOT labels for shipping radioactive packages. From left to right: The Radioactive I “White,” Radioactive II “Yellow,”
Radioactive III “Yellow,” and the Excepted Package Limited Quantity.
Radioactive waste, including used and unused sources. Shipping of radioactive materials is regulated
doses, may also be transferred to an authorized recipi- by the DOT under Title 49 of the CFR.
ent. Transfer of the waste requires verification that the There are four DOT labels used for shipping
recipient is licensed to receive the specified radioactive radioactive materials (Fig. 2-6). The use of each label
material. Furthermore, when transferring this radio- is determined by the quantity of material in the pack-
active material, the facility must follow Department age and the radiation exposure at the surface and at
of Transportation (DOT) shipping guidelines. A sum- 1 meter from the package.
mary of these requirements is outlined in the “Shipping The most common radioactive package shipped
of Radioactive Packages” section. from the Nuclear Cardiology department is the
“UN2910—Excepted Package, Limited Quantity.” For
RECEIVING a package to ship under the specifications of UN2910,
the maximum quantity in the package cannot exceed
Receipt of radioactive packages is outlined in Title 10, the limits derived from the table in 49CFR173.425.
Part 20.1906 of the CFR. Radioactive packages must Furthermore, the following criteria must be met:
be monitored within 3 hours of delivery if received
a. The surface of the package must not exceed
during normal working hours and no later than
0.5 mR/hr.
3 hours from the beginning of the next working day
b. A wipe test of the package must not exceed
if received after normal hours. Proper monitoring
6600 dpm/300 cm2.
requires surveying the package for external radiation
exposure and wipe testing for removable contamina- The limited quantity package limits for common
tion. Radiation surveys must be less than 10 mR/hr at isotopes derived from 49CFR173.425 are illustrated
1 meter and less than 200 mR/hr at the package surface. in Table 2-7. The limits apply to radioactive material
Contamination wipe testing must be performed if there
is suspicion that the package is damaged or the integrity Table 2-7
is degraded in any manner. The wipe test results must
be less than 6600 dpm/300 cm2. Should the wipe test or “Excepted Package Limited Quantity” Limits for
Common Isotopes Used in Nuclear Cardiology
survey results exceed limits, the delivery carrier and the
NRC must be notified immediately.31 Isotope Form Limit
99m
Tc Liquid 11 mCi
SHIPPING OF RADIOACTIVE PACKAGES 201
Tl Liquid 11 mCi
18
In addition to receiving radioactive materials, the F Liquid 1.6 mCi
Nuclear Cardiology department must routinely ship 57
Co Liquid 27 mCi
radioactive materials. These shipments include the 137
Cs Liquid 1.6 mCi
return of spent and unused patient radiopharmaceu- 68
Ge Solid 14 mCi
tical doses, as well as the return of sealed calibration
Table 2-8
DOT Label Radiation Exposure Limits
DOT Label Surface Exposure (mR/hr) 1 M Exposure (mR/hr) Wipe Test Limit
a
Excepted Package Limited Quantity ≤0.5 Background 6600 dpm/300 cm2
White I ≤0.5 Background 6600 dpm/300 cm2
Yellow II >0.5 ≤50 1.0 6600 dpm/300 cm2
Yellow III >50 ≤200 10 6600 dpm/300 cm2
a
The Excepted Package Limited Quantity label conforms to White I limits and the contents of the package meet the specifications of 49CFR173.425.
in both solid and liquid forms. For packages contain- NRC NUREG 1556 Volume 9 Revision 3 provides a
ing more than one isotope, the lower limit applies to sample policy that facilities may choose to adopt in
the entire contents of the package. lieu of developing their own.3 The NRC policy for the
A radioactive package that exceeds the excepted safe use of radioactive materials provides a basis for
package quantities has a surface exposure of less than establishing a safe working environment. The model
0.5 mR/hr, an exposure at 1 meter that is indistin- policy covers proper protective clothing, shielding
guishable from background, and a wipe test of less and handling requirements, safe storage procedures,
than 6600 dpm/300 cm2 receives a Radioactive I procedures for area monitoring, and, most impor-
“White” label. tantly, patient safety.
A Radioactive II “Yellow” label is used for pack-
ages with a surface exposure of 0.5 to 50 mR/hr, a
1-meter exposure of less than 1 mR/hr, and a wipe REFERENCES
test of less than 6600 dpm/300 cm2. The Radioactive
II label is commonly used when shipping calibration 1. The Health Physics Society. 2014. http://hps.org/publicinfor
sources back to the vendor for disposal. mation/ate/faqs/whatisradiation.html. Accessed August 23,
2020.
Packages with a surface exposure of 50 to 200 mR/hr,
2. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2014. http://
a 1-meter exposure of less than 10 mR/hr, and a wipe www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary.html. Accessed
test of less than 6600 dpm/300 cm2 must be labeled August 23, 2020.
with a Radioactive III “Yellow” label. 3. Burkhart M, Cockerham A, Cook J, et al. Consolidated Guid-
ance About Materials Licenses Program-Specific Guidance
Radioactive labels must be placed onto two About Medical Use Licenses. US NRC NUREG-1556, volume 9
sides of the package and packages requiring the revision 3) 2019.
Radioactive I, II, or III label must be classified as a 4. Baldwin JA, Bag AK, White SL, Palot-Manzil FF, O’Malley JP.
“Type A” shipping container. A “Type A” shipping AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(2):251–258.
5. Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Radiation safety and health
container is a strong package that has met certain physics. In: Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME, eds. Physics in
criteria including a water spray test, drop test, com- Nuclear Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier
pression test, and a penetration test. A summary of Science;
the radiation exposure limits for each DOT label is 6. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR § 20.1004
(2018).
illustrated in Table 2-8. 7. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2017. http://
www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation/around-us/sources/
nat-bg-sources.html. Accessed August 23, 2020.
8. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2017. http://
www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation/around-us/sources.html.
SAFE USE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL Accessed August 23, 2020.
9. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2017. http://
The NRC requires licensees to develop a policy for www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation/around-us/sources/man-
the safe use of radioactive materials. Appendix T of made-sources.html. Accessed August 23, 2020.
10. Peck D, Samei E. How to Understand and Communicate 20. Travis EL. Basic biologic interactions of radiation. In: Kelly
Radiation Risk. Image Wisely, 2017. https://www.imagewisely. KM, ed. Primer of Medical Radiobiology. St. Louis, MO:
org/-/media/Image-Wisely/Files/CT/IW-Peck-Samei-Radia Mosby-Yearbook, Inc.; 1989:25–44.
tion-Risk.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2020. 21. Bushberg JT, Boone JM. Radiation biology. In: Mitchell CW,
11. Cameron JR. Are X-rays safe? http://www.angelfire.com/mo/ ed. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. Baltimore, MD:
radioadaptive/jcameron1.html. Accessed August 23, 2020. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011:600, 751–836.
12. Nickoloff EL, Lu ZF, Dutta AK, So JC. Radiation dose descrip- 22. Valentin J. ICRP publication 84: Pregnancy and medical radi-
tors: BERT, COD, DAP, and other strange creatures. Radio- ation. Ann ICRP. 2000;30, 7–67.
graphics. 2008;28(5):1439–1450. 23. Adriaens I, Smitz J, Jacquet P. The current knowledge on
13. Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Skali H, et al. Approaches to reducing radiosensitivity of ovarian follicle development stages. Hum
radiation dose from radionuclide myocardial perfusion imag- Reprod Update. 2009;15(3):359–377.
ing. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(4):592–599. 24. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2017. http://
14. Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, et al. Recommenda-
www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation/protects-you/protection-
tions for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion
principles.html. Accessed August 23, 2020.
imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17(4):709–718.
25. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR § 20.1502
15. Kase KR. Radiation protection principles of NCRP. Health
(2018).
Phys. 2004;87(3):251–257.
16. NCRP 116. 1993. National Council on Radiation Protec- 26. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR § 19.11
tion and Measurements. Limitation of Exposure to Ionizing (2018).
Radiation, NCRP Report No. 116. http://app.knovel.com/ 27. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR § 20.1901
hotlink/toc/id:kpLEIRRN04/limitation-exposure-ionizing/ (2018).
limitation-exposure-ionizing. Accessed November 26, 2014. 28. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR § 20.1902
17. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR § 35.75 (2018).
(2004). 29. USNRC Notice to Employees. 2017. https://www.nrc.gov/
18. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Release of patients re a d i ng - r m / d o c - c ol l e c t i ons / for ms / n rc 3 i n fo. ht m l.
administered radioactive materials. Washington, DC: U.S. Accessed August 23, 2020
Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Regulatory Guide 8.39 30. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR § 35.92
Revision 1; 2020. (2017).
19. Salihu HM, Myers J, August EM. Pregnancy in the workplace. 31. Standards for Protection Against Radiation, 10 CFR § 20.1906
Occup Med (Lond). 2012;62(2):88–97. (2018).
allowed for on-site production of a short-lived posi- radiopharmacy to the nuclear laboratory or its
tron emission agent without the need for an expen- production would be sufficiently simple to allow
sive cyclotron. on-site production.
This chapter will review important characteristics
of the various single-photon emission computerized
tomographic (SPECT) and PET MPI radioactive KINETIC MODELING FOR
agents used in clinical practice, with an increasing MYOCARDIAL BLOOD FLOW
focus on quantitative myocardial blood flow mea-
surement. The emphasis of this chapter is to provide A recent development of nuclear cardiology has been
the nuclear cardiologists with practical knowledge of the ability to quantitate myocardial blood flow in
these agents and a high-level understanding of the conjunction with perfusion imaging. This has added
direction of radiopharmaceutical development. considerably to the diagnostic accuracy, as well as
risk stratification in nuclear imaging. Myocardial
blood flow assessment is becoming commonplace in
IDEAL PHYSIOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS clinical cardiac PET laboratories, and work is con-
OF PERFUSION IMAGING AGENTS tinuing to make it practical at least for some SPECT
systems (Chapter 11). Calculating myocardial blood
The commercially available radionuclides for MPI
flow from measurements of radiotracer uptake and
have advantages and disadvantages. To understand
blood pool concentration requires a model for tracer
these advantages and dispensers, it is important to
transport into myocytes. The most common model
enumerate the characteristics of an “ideal” myocar-
for tracer transport is a multi-compartment model.
dial blood flow tracer:19–21
Each compartment of the model represents a loca-
• Myocardial uptake of an ideal perfusion radio- tion the tracer can be in during the acquisition. In the
tracer should be proportional to the myocardial simplest model, the tracer would begin in the blood
blood supply over a wide range of myocardial (compartment one) and then be transported into the
blood flow values including both exercise and cell (compartment two) (Fig. 3-1). More complicated
pharmacologic stress. models would include parameters for washout from
• Uptake of the radiotracer should allow for delin- the myocyte, compartments for the interstitial layer,
eation of regional changes in uptake and sufficient metabolism of the tracer, and different subcompo-
signal-to-noise to make confident image interpre- nents within the cell.
tation decisions. The choice of a compartmental model for calcu-
• Uptake in noncardiac structures should not inter- lating myocardial blood flow is based on the underly-
fere with the reconstruction and interpretation of ing kinetics of the tracer and the parameters of the
the myocardium. acquisition. In addition, the choice of a compart-
• Uptake of the radiotracer should be rapid enough mental model should take into consideration com-
to allow complete absorption of the radiotracer mon imaging artifacts, such as image noise, patient
within the peak vasodilatation timing window of motion, and noncardiac uptake.
either exercise and/or pharmacologic stress. Most myocardial perfusion tracers are modeled
• Uptake of the radiotracer should be stable through- accurately using a two-tissue compartment model
out the course of perfusion imaging acquisition. (2TCM), where one compartment represents the blood
• Rest/stress patient radiation doses should be less and the two-tissue compartments represent the cell, an
than 10 mSv while maintaining a high-count high- interstitial layer, or subcomponent in the cell:22
resolution tomographic images of the heart.
• The complete rest stress protocol should be com- K1k2 −(k2 + k3)t K1k3 t
Minä kumarsin.
»No, sanokaa pois!» käski hän terävästi. »Kyllä vai eikö, herra de
Berault?»
»Kyllä, monseigneur.»
II luku
»Vihreässä pilarissa»
»Mutta teillä ei ole tilaa tai ruokaa tai on vaimonne sairaana taikka
jotakin muuta on vialla», keskeytin ärtyisesti. »Aion joka tapauksessa
maata täällä. Siihen teidän täytyy tyytyä, sekä itsenne että vaimonne
— jos teillä on sellainen.»
»Se saa rehua», vakuutti mies lyhyeen. Sitten hän odotti, että
menisin sisälle. »Vaimoni on sisällä», jatkoi hän ja katsoi minuun
itsepintaisesti.
»Ei.»
»Ei.»
»Enkö osaa?» sanoi hän räpyttäen silmiään. »Vai niin, vai en?»
Mutta minä ymmärsin. Minä tiesin, että hän oli ollut vähällä
ilmaista kaikki ja lavertaa, että hevonen oli de Cocheforêtin,
comprenez bien! Minä käännyin pimeään, jottei hän olisi nähnyt
hymyäni, enkä sitten laisinkaan kummeksunut, että mies oli
silmänräpäyksessä kerrassaan muuttunut. Oven suljettuaan hän oli
yhtä selvä ja epäluuloinen kuin ennenkin; hän häpesi ja oli
raivoissaan minulle. Hän oli sellaisessa mielentilassa, että olisi
voinut katkaista kurkkuni pienimmästäkin aiheesta.
Juuri sitä olin toivonut, sillä nyt saatoin pitää silmällä ja ainakin
saada selville, poistuiko Cocheforêt ennen aamua. Jollei hän lähtisi
pois, niin aioin hankkia tilaisuuden nähdä hänen kasvonsa ja kenties
saada tietooni muita seikkoja, joista minulle saattoi vastedes olla
hyötyä.
»Vai niin, vai ette», vastasi hän verkalleen. »Ja ettekö halua
mitään?»
Ennen kuin hän oli päässyt ihan alas, olin taas ikkunaluukulla.
Nainen, jonka olin nähnyt, viipyi vielä samassa paikassa, ja hänen
vieressään seisoi mies, joka oli puettu talonpojan asuun ja piteli
lyhtyä. Mutta se mies, jonka olisin mieluimmin nähnyt, ei ollut siellä.
Hän oli mennyt, ja selvää oli, etteivät toiset enää pelänneet minua,
sillä tähystellessäni alas tuli isäntä heidän luokseen, hänkin lyhty
kädessään ja sanoi jotakin naiselle, jolloin tämä katsoi ylös ikkunaani
ja nauroi.