You are on page 1of 5

Ploovium: a decision support system for increasing

water use efficiency of irrigated crops


1st Andrea Martelli 2nd Filiberto Altobelli 3rd Anna Dalla Marta
Soonapse s.r.l. (SME) Research Centre for Agricultural Department of Agriculture, Food,
Rome, Italy Policies and Bioeconomy Environment and Forestry
martelli.andr@gmail.com CREA University of Florence
Rome, Italy Florence, Italy
4th Marco Ciarletti filiberto.altobelli@crea.gov.it https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-7521
Soonapse s.r.l. (SME)
Rome, Italy
marco.ciarletti@soonapse.com

Abstract— Irrigation advisory services (IAS), as well as irrigation with increases in spear number and improved yields
decision supports systems (DSS) designed for irrigation support, [3], [4]. The aim of this preliminary research was to evaluate
are powerful management instruments used to improve Ploovium, a DSS based on IoT, artificial intelligence and
efficiency in irrigation water use. In this context, a preliminary machine learning, for a predictive optimization of irrigation in
research was conducted in an open field asparagus crop in order an in-situ experimentation on asparagus in Villasor (CA)
to: evaluate Ploovium, a DSS based on IoT, artificial Sardinia (Italy).
intelligence and machine learning, for a predictive optimization
of irrigation. This study was carried out in collaboration with II. MATERIAL AND METHODS
LAORE (Agricultural Development Regional Agency of
Sardinia Region), and AGRIS Research Centre, on an This study was carried out in collaboration with LAORE
asparagus in a farm in Villasor (CA). Experimental activities (Agricultural Development Regional Agency of Sardinia
were carried out from August 01 2018 to July 24 2019. Ploovium Region), and AGRIS Research Centre, on asparagus in a farm
is an innovative cloud-based solution, able to produce in Villasor (CA) (fig.1 – fig. 2). Experimental activities were
provisional data on the soil’s water behaviour by the following carried out from August 01 2018 to July 24 2019. Ploovium is
equipment: i) a weather station for measuring rain, air an innovative cloud-based solution with components of the
temperature and humidity; ii) a datalogger with soil water Internet of Things (IoT) and supplied by a Decision Support
sensors at two different depths (30 cm and 80 cm). Ploovium System that uses artificial intelligence technologies such as
allowed to optimize water consumption and, consequently, to neural networks, deep learning and machine learning tools.
manage the crop in a more efficient way, and to prevent any Ploovium is able to interface both with sensors and actuators
possible risk with a degree of reliability normally higher than (to read data transmitted by soil and environmental sensors,
99%. Ploovium has proved to be a low cost and know-how and to send commands for remote activation of pumps) and
solution to support the users to save water and irrigation-related with web services related to weather forecasts. A
costs and to provides precise hints about the texture of the soil. schematization of the forecasting process is reported below
Keywords— asparagus officinalis L.; crop water requirement, (fig. 3). Ploovium’s approach is composed by two levels:
artificial intelligence, IoT modelling of water balance of the soil and data analysis for the
production of irrigation advice. First level: model creation,
through data learning, in order to predict the soil water
I. INTRODUCTION potential, at different depth for the next 5 days, using a time
step by three hours. Based on machine learning tools, it learns
The efficient use of water in agriculture is one of the most water behaviour of any soil from IoT sensors data placed in
important agricultural challenges that modern technologies the experimental site.
are helping to resolve [1]. Nowadays, the evolution of
agriculture steps into agriculture 4.0, thanks to the
employment of current technologies like internet of things
(IoT), big data, artificial intelligence, cloud computing,
remote sensing, etc. Irrigation advisory services (IAS), as well
as decision supports systems (DSS) designed for irrigation
support, are powerful management instruments to achieve the
best efficiency in irrigation water use. The DSS for irrigation
can help the farmer during the decision process, increasing
incomes through optimisation of water use and guaranteeing
the best-expected crop production in a specific growing
season [2]. In particular, such tools can help to increase the
sustainability and the efficiency of irrigated agriculture in
areas characterized by water scarcity or where, due to climate
change, drought spells are becoming more frequent.
Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) is a typical perennial Fig. 1 Map of the experimental site: in-situ experimentation on asparagus in
Villasor (CA) Sardinia (Italy).
crop of the Mediterranean area, which growing season occurs
when the climate water deficit is the highest. Asparagus is
considered a drought tolerant plant, however it responds to

978-1-7281-8783-9/20/$31.00 ©2020 IEEE


328

Authorized licensed use limited to: Robert Gordon University. Downloaded on May 30,2021 at 06:46:28 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
tools are based on the genetics algorithms, a family of
interactive optimization algorithms based on heuristics and
randomness rules.
In order to make Ploovium able to produce provisional data
on the soil’s water behaviour, it was necessary to provide the
following equipment: i) a weather station for measuring rain,
air temperature and humidity; ii) a datalogger with soil water
sensors at two different depths (30 cm and 80 cm). At the time
of installation, on August 10, 2018, the crop was at the
beginning of its third vegetative year. The datalogger with the
Watermark probes for measuring soil water potentials (SWP)
has been positioned in the central area of the field. During the
whole period of the experimentation data were recorded on a
daily basis (within 24h every ½ h), either the behaviour of the
Fig. 3 Asparagus experimental site sensors and the transmission of data packages received by the
Ploovium system.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


The SWP values recorded by the Watermark sensors shown a
non-homogeneous behaviour at the two depths (Fig. 4). In
particular, it is worth notice that SWP measured at 30 cm
reacts in a very short time and with considerable intensity to
changes in weather conditions. Quickly heading towards the
maximum measurement threshold of 200 kPa in the absence
of rain and high temperatures, and then returning just as
quickly towards zero (field saturation index) in case of heavy
rains. On the other hand, the SWP measured at 80 cm shows
much less reactivity, with a persistence of low values
Fig. 3 Schematization of forecasting process (between 60 kPa and zero). However, the slope of the curve is
significantly smaller than the one of the surface sensor (Fig.
The inputs of the system are: i) Soil water potential (SWP); 4). This trend is particularly evident in the period September
ii) Crop evapotranspiration (ETc); iii) Rainfall and possible 01 2018 – October 10 2018 (Fig. 5) when, due to high
irrigation; iv) Forecasts and meteorological data. The number temperatures and the absence of significant rains, the surface
of predicted values for each prediction are calculated sensor values quickly reached 200 kPa, while those detected
according to equation (1): by the deeper sensor reached around 60 kPa. In that soil, at a
ଶସ୦୭୳୰ୱ depth of about one meter, there is probably a supply of water
40 × (n sensors) = 5days × × (n sensors) (1)
ଷ୦୭୳୰ୱ from a water table, so even when the surface sensor shows
Applying random forests methods ensures a good values well beyond the water stress threshold, at a greater
accuracy with reduced dataset, an automatic selection of input depth, the crop maintains a level of RAW (Readily Available
variables and an overfitting resistance. Second level: model Water), which also provides the necessary nutrients. Based on
inferences and data analysis for the management and the data analysis, the timing of reaction of the two sensors to
production of irrigation advice. The irrigation timing and a change in meteorological conditions (rain or high
irrigation water supply advice are determined through temperature) provides precise hints about the texture of the
agronomic calculations and artificial intelligence tools. These soil, in this case a compact clayey type (Fig. 6).

329

Authorized licensed use limited to: Robert Gordon University. Downloaded on May 30,2021 at 06:46:28 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Fig. 4 Overall monitoring process data: WP1 (blue), WP2 (red), air
temperature (yellow), pluviometer (teal), water stress threshold (green).

Fig. 5 Monitoring of period August 30, 2018- October 15, 2018: WP1 (blue),
WP2 (red), air temperature (yellow), pluviometer (teal), water stress
threshold (green).

Fig. 6 Monitoring of the period August 18 – 20, 2018: WP1 (blue), WP2
(red), air temperature (yellow), pluviometer (teal), water stress threshold
(green).
In addition, in this case, the clayey texture of the soil is
In the afternoon of 18 August a rather strong rain event (about confirmed. Ploovium has always provided the predictions on
20 mm of rain), which started at 4.15 p.m. brought the SWP the soil water behaviour, 5 days in advance, with a reliability
values of the surface sensor to zero (field saturation) in about and precision certified of 99% (fig. 7). The predictions for
50 minutes, while the SWP measured by the deeper sensor January 16, 2019, where the level of accuracy of the predicted
reached saturation only at 01.39 a.m. on 19 August. Therefore, data, compared to the real data measured by the sensors, was
the rainwater took about eight and a half hours to pass from 99.49% for the first day, and 99.31% for the next 4 days, in
the saturation of the soil at 30 cm to the one at depth of 80 cm. the first months of experimentation Ploovium never
recommended to irrigate. In March 2019, 3 irrigation
interventions were carried out, due to reasons not managed by
Ploovium. In particular, in March 2019 the asparagus spears
began to blossom, and since the weather remained sunny,
there was the risk that the slight superficial crust of soil,
hardened by the sun, could prevent or slow down their rising.

330

Authorized licensed use limited to: Robert Gordon University. Downloaded on May 30,2021 at 06:46:28 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Therefore, the farm decided to irrigate for softening the soil. IV. CONCLUSIONS
Ploovium recorded these events, an alert was initially sent (it Ploovium allowed to optimize water consumption and,
could have been a failure of the irrigation system) and then, consequently, to manage the crop in a more efficient way, and
based on the measured SWP, the quantity of water supplied to prevent any possible risk. This was possible due the
was determined “a posteriori” (fig. 8). However, in the period monitoring and predictions produced by Ploovium and
June-July 2019, the crop went through the phenological phase characterized by a degree of reliability normally higher than
of growth and flowering to the one of berries ripening. 99%. The feedbacks from LAORE, in addition to confirming
Therefore, it was decided to regulate the irrigation advice the general monitoring and forecasting framework offered by
based on the values of the surface sensor to provide more Ploovium, also highlighted some added values. Based on the
nutrients to the crop. The three irrigation shifts recommended elaboration of the data has emerged that the timing of reaction
by Ploovium can be seen (highlighted by vertical lines for the of the two sensors to a change in meteorological conditions
days of June 13, July 5 and July 17, in Fig. 4) in (rain or high temperature) provides precise hints about the
correspondence with the approaching of predicted SWP texture of the soil. Ploovium is a low cost and know-how
values, coming from the surface sensor, to the water stress solution to support the users to save water and irrigation-
threshold.

Fig. 7 Predictions for January 16, 2019

Fig. 8 Monitoring of the period March 5 – 28, 2019: WP1 (blue), WP2 (red),
air temperature (yellow), pluviometer (teal), water stress threshold (green).

331

Authorized licensed use limited to: Robert Gordon University. Downloaded on May 30,2021 at 06:46:28 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
related costs. Surely, the proactive presence of the users and REFERENCES
the farmers in planning interventions is necessary for the [1] Bonfante, A., Monaco, E., Manna, P., De Mascellis, R., Basile, A.,
optimization of the process, or a fully automated irrigation Buonanno, M., Cantilena, G., Esposito, A., Tedeschi, A., De Michele,
system could be implemented. C., Belfiore, O., Catapano, I., Ludeno, G., Salinas, K., & Brook, A.
(2019). LCIS DSS—An irrigation supporting system for water use
efficiency improvement in precision agriculture: A maize case study.
Agricultural Systems, 176(April), 102646.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102646
[2] Navarro-Hellín, H., Martínez-del-Rincon, J., Domingo-Miguel, R.,
Soto-Valles, F., & Torres-Sánchez, R. (2016). A decision support
system for managing irrigation in agriculture. Computers and
The authors would like to thank LAORE and the AGRIS Electronics in Agriculture, 124, 121–131.
Research Center, who contributed to the realization of the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.04.003
experimentation. The development of Ploovium in Sardinia [3] Roth, R.L., Gardner, B.R., 1991. Asparagus spear size distribution and
and the experimentation were co-funded by POR FESR 2014 earliness as affected by water and nitrogen applications. Trans. Am.
– 2020 of Sardegna Region. Soc. Agric. Eng. 33, 480–486.
[4] Takatori, F.H., Cannell, G.W., Asbell, C.W., 1970. Effects of soil
moisture condition on asparagus at two nitrogen levels. Cal. Agric. 24
(2), 10–12

332

Authorized licensed use limited to: Robert Gordon University. Downloaded on May 30,2021 at 06:46:28 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like