General Notes Health, safety & the environment

1. All dimensions are in metres unless otherwise stated.

In accordance
withthe Construction(DesignandManagement) Regulations
2. All levels are in metres. 2015,the designsand detailson this drawinghavebeenthe subjectof a
DesignersRisk Assessment,to identifyrisks in the construction,
use, or
3. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all relevant Engineers and Architect's drawings, demolition of the scheme.
Specifications, Reports and Engineering Details.
It is not considered necessary for Designers to highlight obvious and/or
4. Do not scale from this drawing. common risks (such as deep excavations, manual handling and working
around heavy plant) which Contractors should be familiar with, and be able
to control by good management and site practice.
Drawing Key Sofaras is reasonablypracticable,
therisksinherentin thedesignhavebeen G 04

eliminated. Whereit hasbeenconsidered thateliminationof a risk(or part BUIL

DIN

Site boundary (Taken from latest referenced Architects site layout) of a risk) is not reasonably practicable, it has been reduced. SHEL
TER

m
TER

536
29.
SHEL
BIKE

Significantunusualresidualrisksare identifiedon the drawingby use of a

Area where levels are amended for proposed works. Levels to remain as existing outside of this area.
YellowCautionMarker,besidethe measureswhichhavebeenadoptedto
Basement level area (Indicative only) eliminate and/or reduce them. E
RAG
STO
BIN

28.060 Proposed formation level W/D

OUTH
OUSE

This drawing has been based/developed using the following external items W/D MIL
LH
OUSE

29.150 Existing ground levels

Type Company Drawing Date
29.000 Existing contour date Title received Rev
Formation levels notes Site Layout Hunters
General
- Proposed Site 08.04.19 -
Plan - Floor 29.
536
m

Buildings 1-4 formation level: Arrangement Plan-002-Site BUIL

DIN
G 03
BUIL
DIN
G 02
BUIL
DING
01

Finished floor level minus floor, finishes and void Plan

Assumed total thickness = 0.650m Topographical Laser Jan Topographical 18.06.18 - m
survey (2D Surveys 2017 Survey 7820/1 926
Basement formation level:
use only) 29.
Finished floor level minus slab
Assumed total thickness = 0.450m Topographical Anthony April Topographical 17.05.18 - Site Extents
survey (3D) Brooks 2018 Survey 10401-1 (Scale 1:1000)
No-Dig construction footway (Cell Web or similar approved) formation level: Surveys 53 6m
Formation level set to existing ground level or higher. 29. m
Assumed total thickness = 0.175m Tree Survey Keen July Tree Protection17.09.18 A 926
Consultants 2018 Plan 29. 26m
9
Hard landscaping formation level: 1055-KC-XX-YTRE 29.
Proposed level minus construction thickness E-TPP01 6m 536m
Assumed total thickness = 0.450m 29.
53 29. m
Site Crossfield Sept Site Investigation08.06.18 - 536 926
m
Investigation Consulting 2017 Report 29. 29.
DRAWING EXCLUDES FOUNDATION & Report CCL02998.CE90
DRAINAGE EXCAVATION 536
m m
Flood Risk Peter Brett Aug Flood Risk 16.08.18 A
29. 875 m
Assessment Associates 2018 Assessment 29. 833
43797/4001 29.
m
536
29.
DRAWINGS HAVE NOT BEEN 536
m
APPROVED, UNTIL THE DRAWINGS 29 .53
6m 29.
ARE APPROVED THE DESIGNS AND m 1m
799 29.76
DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING 5 36m 29.
m 29.
30
ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE 2 9.8
536
m
29.
m
800 m
29. 813 693
m
29. 29.
m
536 687
m
29. m 29.
536
29.
m
m . 536
660 52m 6m 29
29. 29.
6
29.
53
m
638 .616m
29. 29
5 36m 36m
29. 29.
5
m
547
29. 30m
5
Minor remodelling of local levels 29. 536
m
536
m
required 29. 29. 8m
0m m 59
29.
34 788 29.
29.
62 2m
m m 7 61m 29.
m 85m 424 550 29.
310 29.
2 29. 29.
24. m
420
m
424 29.
29. 531
m
Indicative line of proposed m 29.
098 399
m
basement 29. 29.
10m 038
m m
24.
3
29. 364
29. m
m 372
312 0m m 29.
24. 24 .59 5 .054 m
2 317
29.
m
324
m 935
m 29.
123 28. m
26. 958
28.
m
020 333
m
29. 29.
m
500
m
500
m
017
m 208
24. 0m 24. 25.
.25
0m 28.
50 m 27
24. 276 Minor remodelling of local levels
25. Levels to tie back as per existing,
446m 513m required to achieve Part M access m
m excavation required for 28. 28. 874
968 52m 28.
25. 8.4
construction of permeable paving
m m
2 339 514
27m 28. 385
m Levels to tie back as per existing, 29.
m 2 7.2 28. m excavation required for
800 6 71
27. 28. construction of permeable paving
522
m m m
29. 556 71 5m 40m 840
m m 29. 29. 29.
8 29.
.124 220
m
800
m 800
27
28. 27. 27. m
800
m 00m m 09m 4m 033
27. 00m 27.
8 548 840
m 82 29.
2 7.8 m 29. 29.7 29. 29.
639
Indicative line of proposed
.61
1m 28. m
0m basement
80 Indicative line of proposed 00m 28 615
m 27. 27.
8
800
m
800
m 28. m
800 basement
27. 0 m . 664
310
m 27. m 27.
8 0 2 7
28.
24. 310 22m 81m 883
m
310
m 24. 1 4 7m 28.
24. 310
m 28. 28. .51
24. 28
m
811
90m 28.
0m .8
43 6m 28.89 28
28. m
0m 890 29m
800
m
410
m .80 m 28. 28.
5
27. 27. 27 000
28.
m 32m 890
m 90m
800 4 28. 8.8
27. 3 10m 28. 2
m
24. 10m 633
3 .32
5m 28.
24. 28 m
504
.89
0m 829
m 28.
28 28.
m Levels to tie back as per existing,
9m 780
37 28. excavation required for
28. construction of permeable paving
m
410 794
m
27. 28. 477
m
28.
W/D .31
0m 28.
545
m
28.
388
m
28.
890
m
28.
459
m
24 410m
27.
846
m 7 61m
28. 28.
m
638
28. 847
m
28.

m
310 0m
24. 27.41
0m
Indicative line of proposed
2 7 .41
basement

m
310
24. Indicative line of proposed
basement

Indicative line of proposed m m 0m

310 410 41
310
m m basement 24. 27. 27.
24. 310 10m m
310 10m
24. 24.
3
24.27.4

DESIGN IN ABEYANCE FOR

FOOTPATH LINK DUE TO
PRESENCE OF FREE ZONE
(WHICH REQUIRES LIFTING
Bank to Hogsmill River to remain as
existing. Retaining wall to tie into LEVELS) AND PRESENCE OF
top of bank levels
FLOOD PLAIN (WHICH REQUIRES
MAINTAINING LEVELS)
General Arrangement Rev P3 Drawing status updated to TENDER By SWF Checked TH 10.07.2019
(Scale 1:100)
Rev P2 Drawing revised to suit updated levels By RF Checked GL 11.04.2019

Drawn By: GL Client Castleoak Group

Northampton
4 Ironstone Way, Brixworth,
Northampton. NN6 9UD
T: 01604 781811
· Infrastructure Design · Geotechnical & Environmental Chkd By: TH
Project Lower Mill Care Home
Manchester Scale @ A0: 1:100 Kingston Road
3rd Floor, 82 King Street, E: mail@jppuk.net · Structural Engineering · Surveying Ewell
Manchester. M2 4WQ
T:0161 6822927 W: jppuk.net Date: September 2018 Title Proposed Formation Levels Plan
Milton Keynes (Sheet 2 of 2)
Suite 25 Linford Forum, Rockingham Drive, · Planning Services · Professional Advice Status: TENDER
Linford Wood, Milton Keynes. MK14 6LY
T: 01908 889433
Project No.: 9946Z Drawing No: 0657-SP-SL-PL-C-G12-004 Rev: P3
JPP QA Document T06 R1