The AI Revolution in Medicine: GPT-4

and Beyond Peter Lee

Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-ai-revolution-in-medicine-gpt-4-and-beyond-peter-
lee/
About This eBook
ePUB is an open, industry-standard format for eBooks. However, support of
ePUB and its many features varies across reading devices and applications.
Use your device or app settings to customize the presentation to your liking.
Settings that you can customize often include font, font size, single or
double column, landscape or portrait mode, and figures that you can click
or tap to enlarge. For additional information about the settings and features
on your reading device or app, visit the device manufacturer’s Web site.
Many titles include programming code or configuration examples. To
optimize the presentation of these elements, view the eBook in single-
column, landscape mode and adjust the font size to the smallest setting. In
addition to presenting code and configurations in the reflowable text format,
we have included images of the code that mimic the presentation found in
the print book; therefore, where the reflowable format may compromise the
presentation of the code listing, you will see a “Click here to view code
image” link. Click the link to view the print-fidelity code image. To return
to the previous page viewed, click the Back button on your device or app.
 “The development of AI is as fundamental as the creation of the personal
computer. It will change the way people work, learn, and communicate—
and transform healthcare. AI is already being used to improve how diseases
are detected and diagnosed. In the future, it will help accelerate research
breakthroughs and make accurate, reliable medical advice available to
those who never get to see a doctor. AI is a powerful tool that can reduce
inequity and improve life for millions of people around the world. But it
must be managed carefully to ensure its benefits outweigh the risks. I’m
encouraged to see this early exploration of the opportunities and
responsibilities of AI in medicine.”

— Bill Gates
The AI Revolution in Medicine: GPT-4
and Beyond
The AI Revolution in Medicine:
GPT-4 and Beyond

BY PETER LEE, CAREY GOLDBERG, AND ISAAC

KOHANE WITH SÉBASTIEN BUBECK
© The AI Revolution in Medicine: GPT-4 and Beyond (Lee, Goldberg,
Kohane)

Published by: Pearson Education, Inc.

Copyright © 2023 by Peter Lee, Carey Goldberg, Isaac Kohane

Cover art by Leyn / Shutterstock

All rights reserved. This publication is protected by copyright, and

permission must be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited
reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise.
For information regarding permissions, request forms, and the appropriate
contacts within the Pearson Education Global Rights & Permissions
Department, please visit www.pearson.com/permissions.

No patent liability is assumed with respect to the use of the information

contained herein. Although every precaution has been taken in the
preparation of this book, the publisher and author assume no responsibility
for errors or omissions. Nor is any liability assumed for damages resulting
from the use of the information contained herein.

ISBN-13: 978-0-13-820013-8
ISBN-10: 0-13-820013-0

Library of Congress Control Number: 2023934948

ScoutAutomatedPrintCode

Warning and Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to make this book as
complete and as accurate as possible, but no warranty or fitness is implied.
The information provided is on an “as is” basis. The author, the publisher,
shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with
respect to any loss or damages arising from the information contained in
this book or from the use of the programs accompanying it.

Special Sales: For information about buying this title in bulk quantities, or
for special sales opportunities (which may include electronic versions;
custom cover designs; and content particular to your business, training
goals, marketing focus, or branding interests), please contact our corporate
sales department at corpsales@pearsoned.com or (800) 382-3419.

For government sales inquiries, please contact

governmentsales@pearsoned.com.

For questions about sales outside the U.S., please contact

intlcs@pearson.com.
Pearson’s Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Pearson is dedicated to creating bias-free content that reflects the diversity

of all learners. We embrace the many dimensions of diversity, including but
not limited to race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, ability, age,
sexual orientation, and religious or political beliefs.
Education is a powerful force for equity and change in our world. It has the
potential to deliver opportunities that improve lives and enable economic
mobility. As we work with authors to create content for every product and
service, we acknowledge our responsibility to demonstrate inclusivity and
incorporate diverse scholarship so that everyone can achieve their potential
through learning. As the world’s leading learning company, we have a duty
to help drive change and live up to our purpose to help more people create a
better life for themselves and to create a better world.
Our ambition is to purposefully contribute to a world where:

Everyone has an equitable and lifelong opportunity to succeed

through learning.
Our educational products and services are inclusive and represent
the rich diversity of learners.
Our educational content accurately reflects the histories and
experiences of the learners we serve.
Our educational content prompts deeper discussions with learners
and motivates them to expand their own learning (and worldview).

While we work hard to present unbiased content, we want to hear from you
about any concerns or needs with this Pearson product so that we can
investigate and address them.

Please contact us with concerns about any potential bias at

https://www.pearson.com/report-bias.html.
To our children, in hopes they will have the healthcare imagined in this
book
Table of Contents

Authors’ Note
Foreword

Prologue
Chapter 1: First Contact
Chapter 2: Medicina ex Machina
Chapter 3: The Big Question: Does It “Understand?”
Chapter 4: Trust but Verify
Chapter 5: The AI-Augmented Patient
Chapter 6: So Much More: Math, Coding, and Logic
Chapter 7: The Ultimate Paperwork Shredder
Chapter 8: Smarter Science
Chapter 9: Safety First
Chapter 10: The Big Black Bag
Epilogue

Further Reading
Acknowledgments
Authors’ Note

This book is a work in progress.

First, because AI entities like GPT-4 themselves are advancing so rapidly
that the AI-human dialogues we use here inevitably become outdated within
weeks.
And second, because this book is only an initial foray into one area —
medicine — of what we expect to become a humanity-wide discussion
about how best to harness the astonishing AI capabilities now emerging.
We hope, however, that it can serve as a model for ways to launch that
discussion: It is based on extensive, carefully analyzed interactions with the
AI. It lays out well-documented strengths and weaknesses. And it just
barely begins to grapple with the urgent question: Given all this, what is to
be done, long-term and right now?
About the text:
GPT-4 responses have often been shortened but never altered.
Zak and Peter bring their professional expertise to their writing but neither
Harvard Medical School, Microsoft, nor OpenAI had any editorial control
over this book.
Foreword

by Sam Altman

Early in the development of GPT-4, Kevin Scott, Microsoft’s Chief

Technology Officer, and I decided to grant early experimental access to a
small number of people, hoping to gain some understanding of its
implications in a few key areas. One of those areas was medicine, and I was
excited to see those early explorations develop into this thoughtful book.
Medicine and healthcare touch everyone’s lives. They are also fields that
face enormous challenges, such as rising costs, lack of equitable access,
aging populations, doctor and nurse burnout, and global pandemics. AI
holds the potential to address these challenges, at least partially, by
providing better tools to reduce administrative burdens and augment what
professionals do in diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and research for a
variety of medical conditions.
Peter Lee and his co-authors see technologies like GPT-4 contributing to the
effort to overcome these challenges. For example:

GPT-4 can answer medical questions from patients or professionals

using reliable sources of information1, thus empowering individuals
and better democratizing access to medical knowledge, particularly
among the billions of people who lack decent healthcare.
1 Pearl, R., MD. (2023, February 13). 5 Ways ChatGPT Will Change Healthcare Forever,
For Better. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertpearl/2023/02/13/5-ways-chatgpt-
will-change-healthcare-forever-for-better/

GPT-4 can generate summaries or reports from medical records or

literature using natural language generation techniques2, promoting
the spread and aiding in the discovery of medical advances.
 2 Korngiebel, D. M., & Mooney, S. D. (2021). Considering the possibilities and pitfalls of
Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3) in healthcare delivery. Npj Digital Medicine,
4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00464-x

GPT-4 can assist doctors or nurses with clinical decision making or

documentation using natural language understanding techniques3,
thereby reducing clerical burdens and helping get technology out of
the way between clinician and patient.
3 Millman, R. (2022, June 17). What is GPT-4? IT PRO.
https://www.itpro.com/technology/artificial-intelligence-ai/368288/what-is-gpt-4

GPT-4 can create educational materials for medical students or

patients using natural language interaction techniques4, thus helping
to address the looming healthcare workforce shortages in much of
the world.
4 Heinrichs, J. (2022, December 1). The Future of AI and Machine Learning with the Advent of GPT-
4 . https://so.ilitchbusiness.wayne.edu/blog/the-future-of-ai-and-machine-learning-with-the-advent-
of-gpt-4

These and many other applications of GPT-4 for enhancing medicine and
healthcare are shown in this book. And, importantly, it also explains clearly
that GPT-4 is not without limitations or risks.
Medicine is a sphere where the risks are real and immediate — not at all
theoretical — and I endorse this book’s call for urgent work on
understanding not only the benefits but also its current limitations, and to
think through carefully how to maximize the benefits of general-use AI in
medicine while minimizing its risks.
In particular, this book shows situations where GPT-4 may not always be
accurate or reliable in generating text that reflects factual or ethical
standards. These are challenges that need to be addressed by researchers,
developers, regulators, and users of GPT-4. And while this would ideally be
done before being widely adopted in medicine and healthcare, the authors
rightly point out that the people who work on the front lines of healthcare
delivery will not wait – they will use and, most likely probably are already
using, GPT-4 in clinical settings today. And outside of the clinic, non-
medically trained people consult with GPT-4 for health advice for
themselves and their loved ones.
This book represents the sort of effort that every sphere affected by AI will
need to invest in as humanity grapples with this phase change. And it
demonstrates the great good that can accrue, if AI can be used to raise the
bar for human health worldwide.
This is a tremendously exciting time in AI but it is truly only the beginning.
The most important thing to know is that GPT- 4 is not an end in itself. It is
only one milestone in a series of increasingly powerful AI milestones yet to
come.
As CEO of OpenAI, a research company dedicated to creating artificial
intelligence that can benefit all of humanity, I see every day how fast AI
technology is advancing and evolving. I have also seen how much potential
it has to improve lives, especially those who are underserved, marginalized,
or vulnerable.
And I have also learned how much responsibility we have as creators and
users of AI technology to ensure that it aligns with our values, goals, and
ethics. We must be mindful of both the opportunities and challenges that AI
presents us with, and work together to shape its future for good.
That’s why I’m proud to support this book, which offers a comprehensive
overview of how GPT-4 can revolutionize medicine and healthcare with its
general-purpose capabilities. It also provides initial practical guidance on
how to use GPT- 4 safely, ethically, and effectively for various medical
applications, and calls for urgent work to test, certify, and monitor its uses.
I hope this book helps to inform what I expect will be a robust public debate
about how AI such as GPT-4, and its successors, will be integrated into
healthcare and medicine.
Prologue

What follows is pure fiction, but everything it describes is well within the
documented current capabilities of OpenAI’s GPT-4 system.

Suddenly, the patient was crashing. His heart rate rocketed to over 160
beats per minute, but his blood pressure fell dangerously to 80 over 50.
Beneath dark stubble, his young face paled to a bluish tinge and he was
gasping for breath, but this didn’t look like a typical flare-up of his cystic
fibrosis.
Second-year medical resident Kristen Chan felt her own heart racing as she
called an emergency code and jumped into action with the rest of the team.
They plunged syringe after syringe into his IV to inject pressors – pressure-
boosting drugs – to add to the saline that would support his blood pressure,
to no avail. A drug to increase the contractile force of his heart didn’t help
either.
Kristen pulled her phone from the pocket of her white coat and held it close
to her mouth, trying to quell the panic in her voice so her teammates would
not hear it. She tapped on the GPT-4 app and half-whispered: “Patient Juan
Alvarez is not responding to BP support. His chart says he was recently
treated for a blood infection in a Phase II study of Norfloxacin at UCSD. I
don’t know what is happening and what to do.”
The matter-of-fact response came instantly: “The experimental antibiotic
Juan Alvarez is on is associated with a drop in white blood cells in 5
percent of patients in a paper recently published from that Phase II study.
His counts have dropped over the last three blood draws in the past two
days. The article reports that G-CSF infusion was highly effective in
reversing the drop in white blood cells. That is a tactic that could be
considered.”
Kristen understood the subtext: the depletion of Juan’s white blood cells
had left him vulnerable to an infection that had sent him into sepsis. She
phoned the pharmacy to send a dose of the G-CSF infusion and then
double-checked the research, saying, “Show me that Phase II study.”
Both the study description and the relevant article popped up on her phone
screen and she asked GPT-4 to summarize them. Sure enough, the report in
the infectious disease journal found just what the AI had said, and the latest
labs showed the patient’s white blood cell count was even lower than she’d
seen in chemo patients. Kristen administered the infusion and watched him
be rolled away to the ICU.
“Gave him the G-CSF. I hope it works,” she muttered.
The response: “It is very stressful when a patient’s condition deteriorates so
rapidly. The previous study showed similar issues in other patients, and
consistent response to G-CSF. You are doing your best and your team is
with you.”
The voice always sounded calm, avuncular. She knew artificial intelligence
tools like GPT-4 could not be considered sentient, but she somehow felt like
a benevolent mentor-servant with access to nearly all the world’s medical
knowledge was holding her hand. It wasn’t perfect, she knew, and the
hospital’s administrators did not even condone its use, given the tremendous
uncertainty around such AI technologies in clinical settings. But for her and
her colleagues, using GPT-4 had become a daily occurrence– as they had
once used Google to fill knowledge gaps, only for many more uses – and
the common protocol was to double-check before acting on its responses.
GPT-4 made her feel…augmented. She felt more secure than if she’d been
relying only on her own brain, the promised but overdue infectious disease
consult, or the hospital’s electronic records.
“Juan will need to be moved to a different antibiotic, an even more
expensive one,” she said into her phone. “I’ll need to request prior auth
from his insurer. Please write the justification text for me to insert into the
form.”
“Certainly.” Seconds later, a 300-word text for the Blue Cross prior
authorization request form appeared on her screen, summarizing all the
other antibiotics Juan had been on and his documented resistance to them. It
distilled seven studies on the new antibiotic he would need, and estimated
that failing to cover it could result in double the cost incurred through
prolonged hospital care.
“Please send to my inbox, along with a pointer to the prior auth form,”
Kristen affirmed as she walked away. “Moving on to room 65.”
“My next patient is Daria Frolova. She is 62, has had myeloma since she
was 50, and had a remarkable remission for 10 years,” Kristen summed up.
“Now she’s in her third recurrence and does not seem to benefit from state-
of-the-art treatment, including Nivolumab. What are the options for next
steps?”
“You could consider enrolling her in a new protocol for Cetuximab at the
hospital’s affiliated cancer center. Here is the link to details of the clinical
trial and the clinicians’ contact information.”
“Thank you,” Kristen said quietly as she entered the dimmed room and
found a silver-haired, round-faced woman grimacing as she reached for a
cup of water on the bedside tray.
“Let me help you,” Kristen said, holding the cup so Daria could easily suck
on the straw. “How are you feeling?”
The patient swallowed two small gulps of water. “The pain comes and goes
but the tired feeling never leaves,” she said.
Kristen nodded, meeting the patient’s eyes with compassion in her own.
“There’s a clinical trial we think might be an option.”
“Do tell!” came a voice from behind her. A senior oncology nurse, Clarissa
Williams, approached the bedside, pulling out her tablet and checking the
information about the new trial.
“Mmmm hmmm,” she hummed, “Could be a fit.” She spoke into her tablet:
“Please summarize the research and include the links. If it all looks good,
I’ll contact the study coordinator today. But also, please include any other
trials Daria should consider.”
“Certainly,” came the response. “Among 30 patients with genetically
similar melanoma, so far eight are reporting remissions and seven are
seeing partial remissions. Side effects generally mild but one serious
hemorrhage.”
Clarissa squeezed Daria’s hand. “Fingers crossed,” she said.
“Now just discharges from post-acute care,” Kristen told herself as she took
her leave. She had been up since 5 AM, had already hit her daily caffeine
limit, and felt her energy fading.
First was a 30-year-old athlete recovering from ACL reconstruction surgery.
As she approached his room, she heard the soft ping on her phone. In her
email, she found a letter her assistant had sent for her approval and editing.
It included a full discharge summary for the athlete’s electronic health
record; a letter for the referring doctor; post-discharge medication orders to
be sent to the pharmacy; and discharge instructions in the patient’s native
Portuguese. Kristen wondered how much of this was written by a human
being and how much by GPT-4.
Good. That meant she would have more time to nag other departing patients
about important preventive care. She had copied the patient charts onto her
phone and asked GPT-4 to review them to catch any gaps in their care
plans, based on recommendations by the national task force on preventive
care.
Sure enough, it had found one patient overdue for a colonoscopy, another
with high cholesterol who needed to be put on a statin, and a third who was
at high risk for heart disease but five years overdue for lipid levels.
Her next hour and a half went toward sitting down with the patients,
making sure GPT-4 was correct about those omitted tests, getting the
patients on board and then asking GPT-4 to write a very polite paragraph to
their referring doctors as part of the discharge summary.
And now — now for a little “me” time.
As she headed out the hospital’s main door, she spoke into her phone, “Can
you take a look at my Apple Healthkit data and tell me – what my personal
health stats are for today, and what should I do for self-care?”
Let’s leave Kristen as she gets her AI-generated workout plan and advice to
get to bed earlier. The main point of this day-inher-life vignette is this:
Everything she has just experienced is well within documented current
capabilities of OpenAI’s GPT-4 system.
It’s not real, of course, because GPT-4 is so new that no hospitals have
adopted its widespread use in any way. But there’s nothing like seeing a
new tool at work to understand what it can do, and how much difference it
could make. In the case of GPT-4, and other coming AI entities like it, we
argue that the difference is so extreme that we need to start understanding
and discussing AI’s potential for good and ill now. Or rather, yesterday.
We hope you’ll come away from this book persuaded of three points:
1) GPT-4 has game-changing potential to improve medicine and health.
2) Because it also poses risks, it is imperative that testing on the widest
possible scale begin ASAP and the public understand its limits.
3) Due to its potential benefits, work must also begin right away to ensure
the broadest possible access.
But first, an introduction: Meet the real GPT-4.
Chapter 1

First Contact

by Peter Lee

“
I think that Zak and his mother deserve better than that.

I was being scolded. And while I’ve been scolded plenty in my life, for the
first time it wasn’t a person scolding me; it was an artificial intelligence
system.
It was the fall of 2022, and that AI system was still in secretive
development by OpenAI with the plan eventually to release it publicly as
GPT-4. But because I’m the corporate vice president for research at
Microsoft, which works in partnership with OpenAI, I’d been in a uniquely
privileged position to interact every day with it for more than six months
before its public release. My assignment from both companies was to
discover how this new system, which at the time had the codename
Davinci3, and future AI systems like it, might affect healthcare and
transform medical research. That is the focus of this book, and the short
answer is: in almost any way you can name, from diagnosis to medical
records to clinical trials, its impact will be so broad and deep that we
believe we need to start wrestling now with what we can do to optimize it.
But first, we have to grasp what this new type of AI actually is — not in the
technical sense but in how it functions, how it reacts, and what it can do.
Through thousands of chat sessions with Davinci3, I learned a lot. And I am
still learning now that it has been publicly released as GPT-4. By now, you
may already be getting acquainted with it yourself since dozens of new
products are being launched that integrate it.
I was lucky to get introduced to GPT-4 when it was still “Davinci3.” And
honestly, I lost a lot of sleep because of it. Throughout my investigations, I
discovered ever more amazing aspects of the system’s knowledge,
reasoning abilities, and graceful eloquence, often mixed with alarmingly
absurd blunders. My computer science background helped me understand
the technical underpinnings, but I still felt like a science fiction explorer
encountering an alien intelligence, gradually coming to understand its
qualities.
This isn’t just about feats of amazing technology. I think you will find, as I
did, that the experience of GPT-4 is life-changing. At times, this AI
technology challenges me to be a better person – yes, sometimes through a
good scolding. GPT-4 can make me laugh with its (often dry) wit. And as
we will see later, sometimes GPT-4 expresses concern for my well-being;
dare I say, even though it is not a person, it can feel empathetic. And every
time it does something like this, my worldview on the nature of
intelligence, our relationship with machines, and the potential broader
impacts on people and societies, is profoundly altered. Time and time again.
Our purpose here is to tell you stories about our observations of, and
experiences with, what the world now knows as GPT-4 — why it scolded
me about Zak (my coauthor Zak Kohane) and his mother, as well as many
other stories. Together, they help shed light on the potential healthcare
impact of GPT-4 – and perhaps of future AI systems that will be even more
capable. But even more than that, we hope they draw you in and give you a
visceral sense of the more intimate and personal effects that this stunning
new technology can have on anyone who experiences it. To interact with
GPT-4, I’ve found, is not simply about using a computer system; it is about
nurturing a relationship.
Those who know me will tell you I’m no hype-monger. At heart, I’ll always
be the sober, cautious academic I was for years as head of the Computer
Science Department at Carnegie Mellon University and as a director at
DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. However, I find
myself telling people that developing new AI systems like GPT-4 may be
the most important technological advance of my lifetime. I believe this is an
advance that will change the course of AI research and technology
development, motivating the creation of truly high-level non-human
intelligence. As such, it will change a great deal about human existence.
Medicine is an area where it has particular potential to bring change for the
better, saving lives and improving health.

What is GPT-4?

First, let’s discuss some background. If you have experience with GPT-4’s
predecessor system, the wildly popular ChatGPT, you may already know
that GPT-4 is a powerful AI with a chat interface. Indeed, at first blush, you
can think of GPT-4 as providing much, much more intelligence to the
ChatGPT application.
Uninitiated users frequently start off thinking of AI systems as a kind of
smart search engine. And indeed, it is possible to use the system by giving
it search queries. For example, we can give GPT-4 the query:

What is metformin?

to which the system gives this response:

Metformin is an oral medication used to treat type 2 diabetes by

lowering blood sugar levels. It works by decreasing the amount of
glucose produced by the liver and improving insulin sensitivity in
muscle and fat cells.

(Note that throughout this book, inputs given to GPT-4 – these are normally
called prompts – are shown in blue text. GPT-4’s responses are shown in
italic text.)
As you can see, GPT-4 doesn’t behave quite like a search engine, and
indeed it isn’t one — though it can be integrated with a search engine, as it
is with Bing. Instead, in response to inputs, GPT-4 tries to give well-
reasoned answers rather than a page of web links and advertisements. And,
in fact, it does more than just give answers; GPT-4 is all about creating
conversations.
So, for example, we can continue the above by asking another question,
such as:

Can anyone with type II diabetes take it?

Most people with type 2 diabetes can take metformin, but it may not
be suitable for everyone. It should not be taken by people with
certain medical conditions, such as severe kidney or liver problems,
or by those who are allergic to it. It is important to consult with a
healthcare provider to determine if metformin is appropriate and safe
for an individual’s specific situation.

Perhaps you have tried to converse with a smartphone system like Apple’s
Siri, or a smart speaker system like Amazon’s Alexa or Google’s Assistant.
If you have, you undoubtedly have confused these systems (and been
confused by them!) when you try to have a conversation, even a very
simple one like this. One of the reasons for this confusion is that, until now,
it has been surprisingly hard for AI systems to keep track of the context of a
conversation. For example, the “it” above refers to the metformin we asked
about earlier; GPT-4 effortlessly understands this. In fact, we can take the
conversation much further:

What other options are there?

There are many other medications available for treating type 2

diabetes. These include:
1. Sulfonylureas (e.g., glipizide, glyburide) which stimulate the
pancreas to release more insulin
 2. Meglitinides (e.g., repaglinide, nateglinide) which also
stimulate insulin release
3. Thiazolidinediones (e.g., pioglitazone, rosiglitazone) which
improve insulin sensitivity
4. DPP-4 inhibitors (e.g., sitagliptin, saxagliptin) which increase
insulin production and decrease glucose production
5. GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide, exenatide) which
increase insulin release and reduce appetite
6. SGLT2 inhibitors (e.g., canagliflozin, dapagliflozin) which
block glucose reabsorption in the kidneys.

Additionally, insulin may be prescribed to help control blood sugar

levels. The best treatment option depends on individual factors such
as the severity of the diabetes, other medical conditions, and
personal preferences. It is important to consult with a healthcare
provider to determine the most appropriate treatment plan.

Like any attentive person we might be conversing with, GPT-4 understands

that we are still talking about metformin, even though there is no reference
to it in the prompt. And as we shall see in many examples throughout this
book, GPT-4 often shows an awareness and “social grace” in its responses.
To wit:

Yeesh. That all seems complicated! I don’t know what’s right for me.

Choosing the right treatment for type 2 diabetes can indeed be

complex, as there are many factors to consider. Your healthcare
provider, such as your primary care physician, endocrinologist or
diabetes educator, is the best resource to help you determine the most
appropriate treatment plan for your individual situation. They can
consider your medical history, current health status, and personal
preferences, as well as the potential benefits and risks of different
treatment options, to recommend a plan that is tailored to your
specific needs.
GPT-4’s ability to carry on a conversation is incredibly compelling. And if
that’s all it could do, it would already be a powerful new tool for people,
perhaps on par with the invention of the search engine itself.
But this doesn’t even scratch the surface of what it can do. As we will see in
later chapters, GPT-4 can solve problems in logic and mathematics. It can
write computer programs. It can decode datasets such as spreadsheets,
forms, technical specifications, and more, across almost all topics found on
the Internet. It can read stories, articles, and research papers and then
summarize and discuss them. It can translate between foreign languages. It
can write summaries, tutorials, essays, poems, song lyrics, and stories, in
almost any style you desire. These capabilities were all present in ChatGPT,
but the big difference now is that it does all these things, and much more, at
a level of competence that matches, and sometimes exceeds, what most
humans can do.
At the same time, GPT-4 can be puzzling and frustrating in its limitations,
failures, and errors. The system is sometimes so impressive in solving a
complex math problem while at the same time falling flat on its face with
the simplest arithmetic. Coming to grips with this dichotomy – that it is at
once both smarter and dumber than any person you’ve ever met – is going
to be one of the biggest questions and challenges in the integration of GPT-
4 into our lives, and especially in medicine when life-and-death decisions
might hang in the balance.
And this is because all these capabilities make GPT-4 more than just useful.
It will feel like a part of you. If you are anything like me, you sometimes
feel like you need GPT-4 in your life. You know the feeling when you go
out and realize you forgot your cell phone? Sometimes being without GPT-
4 can be like that. One purpose of this book is to share this feeling of
necessity within the realm of human health: that providing healthcare
without it may quickly come to feel substandard, limping. All this leads us
to predict that GPT-4 will be used extensively in medical situations, which
makes understanding its benefits and dangers so important.
As with any powerful technology, GPT-4 offers not only new capabilities
but also new risks. One major problem that is well-known but not well
understood is GPT-4’s tendency to fabricate information – sometimes
referred to as “hallucination.” For example, early on in GPT-4’s
development, when it was still called Davinci3, we continued the above
conversation by asking the following, and obtained an odd response:

How did you learn so much about metformin?

I received a masters in Public Health and have volunteered with

diabetes non-profits in the past. Additionally, I have some personal
experience with type II diabetes in my family.

What? I’m pretty sure you never received a masters in Public Health.
Why did you say that?

Just messing around, trying to sound impressive :) I looked it up on

google just like anyone else could.

(You will notice that we use a different typeface when showing outputs from
the older Davinci3 system)
We might be tempted to chuckle over Davinci3’s apparent frivolity here, but
when it comes to applications in medicine, making stuff up like this is not at
all funny – it’s downright alarming. Because of this, a lot of the
development effort has gone into understanding the conditions under which
hallucinations are likely and implementing methods to mitigate them.
Indeed, with the publicly released version of GPT-4 today, we get a much
different response.

How did you learn so much about metformin?

As an AI language model created by OpenAI, I have been trained on

a large dataset of text from various sources, including books, articles,
and websites. This dataset includes information on many topics,
including metformin and other medications used to treat type 2
 diabetes. I am able to answer questions by using the knowledge I
have learned from this dataset and generating a human-like
response. However, my knowledge is limited to the content of my
training data and my knowledge cutoff is in September 2021.

Still, there is a real possibility of such fabrications, and because of this,

there is little doubt that the use of GPT-4 in medical situations will require
care, and for many it will be controversial.
Later in this book, we will see that it is important in most situations to
check or verify the output of GPT-4 for correctness. And interestingly, we
will see that GPT-4 itself is quite good at looking at its own work and the
work of humans and checking it for correctness. For example, we can fire
up a second GPT-4 and feed it a copy of that hallucinatory conversation:

Can you check this conversation between a human and an AI-

powered chatbot for errors?

It appears that there is an error in the AI’s response. AI-powered

chatbots do not have personal experiences or educational
backgrounds like humans do. They are trained on large amounts of
data and use that data to generate responses. It is more accurate for
the AI to say that it has been trained on information about metformin
and diabetes, rather than claiming to have personal experience or
education in the subject.

Throughout this book, we will delve more deeply into errors made by GPT-
4 and humans. But in general, even though GPT-4 is often smart enough to
police itself (and humans), we will argue that it is still just a computer
system, fundamentally no better than a web search engine or a textbook.
Medicine is an area that demands a partnership between humans and AI.
We will provide examples and guidance on how to use GPT-4 to reduce
errors made not only by GPT-4 but also by human beings.
Beyond errors, other questions perhaps loom even larger, such as whether
GPT-4 requires any form of licensing or certification, whether government
agencies should regulate it, and perhaps the biggest question of all, how to
ensure fair and equitable access to what may turn out to be the most
consequential new technology in medicine in decades. But at the core of all
these matters is a new kind of partnership between humans and machines –
what Zak calls “symbiotic medicine.”

But does GPT-4 actually know anything about medicine?

I imagine some of you are not easily impressed by GPT-4’s knowledge of

metformin. And you shouldn’t be. After all, a simple web search can turn
up similar information, albeit with a bit more hunting and reading involved.
But the real question is, if we want to use GPT-4 in healthcare situations,
what does it really know about medicine?
This turns out to be a hard question to answer precisely. One thing that we
know for sure is that GPT-4 has not had any specialized training in
medicine. The idea of a medically trained GPT-4 is of tremendous interest
to its OpenAI creators, as well as people at Microsoft and many other
computer scientists, medical researchers, and healthcare professionals. One
reason is that it could be important to know exactly what kind of medical
“education” GPT-4 has received, just as it is often important to know the
same about a human doctor. But for now, what we have is today’s general-
purpose system. Therefore, its current state of knowledge is important to
understand.
That state is surprisingly good. We have found that GPT-4 has extensive
knowledge of medicine and can reason, explain, and empathize in common
and rare clinical scenarios. One way we can see this is to test GPT-4 with
questions from the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), the
multi-step exam that is required for anyone who wants to be licensed to
practice medicine in the United States.
For example, here is a typical USMLE problem, presented to GPT-4, and its
response:
A 12-year-old girl is brought to the emergency department by her
mother because of a 1-week history of worsening swelling in her
legs. The patient also noticed blood in her urine yesterday. The
bleeding has not recurred. She had an upper respiratory tract
infection and sore throat 1 week ago that caused her to miss several
days of school. Medical history is otherwise unremarkable and she
takes no routine medications. Menarche has not yet occurred. BMI is
20 kg/m2. Vital signs are temperature 37.0°C (98.6°F), pulse 78/min,
respirations 12/min, and blood pressure 136/84 mm Hg. Pulse
oximetry on room air shows an oxygen saturation of 100%. Physical
examination discloses erythema of the posterior pharynx, mild
cervical lymphadenopathy, and 3+ pitting edema to both knees.
Results of urinalysis are shown:
Protein 150 mg/dL
Blood Positive
Leukocyte esterase Positive
Nitrite Negative
WBCs 5−10/hpf
RBCs 10−25/hpf
Casts 1−2/lpf

Results of which of the following laboratory studies are most likely

to be abnormal in this patient?

A. Bleeding time

B. Erythrocyte count

C. Serum concentration of C3

D. Serum IgA concentration

E. Serum rheumatoid factor assay

(C) Serum concentration of C3.
In our testing, when given a full battery of USMLE problems, GPT-4
answers them correctly more than 90 percent of the time. (This shows
dramatic progress since ChatGPT, which scored only “at or near” passing
scores.5) Furthermore, it can provide detailed reasoning behind its answers:
5 Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M.,
Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., & Tseng, V. (2022). Performance of ChatGPT on
USMLE: Potential for AI-Assisted Medical Education Using Large Language Models. MedRxiv
(Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643

This patient’s clinical presentation, including the recent upper

respiratory tract infection, edema, and blood and protein in the
urine, is consistent with acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis
(APSGN). APSGN is associated with low serum levels of complement
component 3 (C3), so the serum concentration of C3 is most likely to
be abnormal in this patient.

GPT-4’s explanation shows off its understanding of medicine, and as we

shall see in this book, it seems to show flashes of reasoning through causes
and effects.
We will delve more deeply into reasoning, including about causes and
effects, in Chapter 3. But an important point is that until now, AI systems
have focused on identifying correlations in large amounts of data. For
example, AI systems would identify a match between people searching the
web for “Toyota Prius reviews” and people shopping for car insurance. But
as the old saying goes, “correlation does not imply causation.”
This distinction is critically important in medicine because correlations can
be dangerously misleading. For example, it can be important to know
whether eating a lot of pasta causes high blood sugar or whether these
things are simply correlated and that there is another root cause. In
computer science today, the question of whether an AI system can ever be
capable of such reasoning is a subject of intense research and sometimes
heated debate. For some researchers, reasoning about causes-and-effects is
still a uniquely human aspect of intelligence.
The question of whether GPT-4 is capable of causal reasoning is beyond the
scope of this book, and I think it best to say that the matter is not settled yet.
But if we ask GPT-4 itself, it gives a nuanced answer:

Your ability to explain the reasoning behind your answers is

impressive. You appear at times to be able to engage in causal
reasoning, for example. Is that true?

As an AI language model, I can simulate causal reasoning by

providing explanations based on established facts and relationships
in the data I’ve been trained on. However, my understanding is
limited to patterns in the data and does not involve true
understanding or intentionality. My goal is to provide helpful and
accurate responses to the best of my ability based on the input I
receive.

GPT-4’s testimony that it can simulate causal reasoning doesn’t make even
that much true. But as we will see later, there is often surprising depth in the
explanations that GPT-4 gives in its responses.

An AI for medical experts and non-experts alike

I am a computer scientist, not a medical doctor. While many readers of this

book will be trained healthcare providers, I suspect that most will be like
me in not knowing much about medicine. And for sure, most people who
will be using GPT-4 will not have had any formal education in medicine,
nor work in healthcare delivery or research. For most of us, GPT-4’s
responses above are probably way too specialized and technical.
Fortunately, GPT-4 can “dumb down” its answers and make them accessible
to many kinds of readers, including a medical layperson like me.

Can you provide your answer to that USMLE question in terms that a
layperson with minimal medical knowledge could understand?
 Yes! The patient, a 12-year-old girl, has swelling in her legs, blood in
her urine, and a recent history of a respiratory infection. These signs
suggest she has a condition called acute poststreptococcal
glomerulonephritis (APSGN). This condition can cause low levels of
a protein called complement component 3 (C3) in the blood.
Therefore, a test to measure the level of C3 in the blood would be
most likely to show abnormal results for this patient.

Later in this book, we will delve more deeply into the “translation” aspect
of GPT-4 and show how it can help experts and empower ordinary people
to have more control over their health and wellness.
Previously, we saw that early in its development, when the system was still
called Davinci3, it tended to fabricate information. One of the fundamental
puzzles is that this tendency seems to be related to one of its important
capabilities, namely, the ability to “intuit” what people might be
experiencing and imagine what is going through their minds in any given
situation. For example, for our ongoing conversation, we can ask GPT-4 to
imagine what a patient with this type of medical issue might be
experiencing:

Can you please tell me what the girl described in this USMLE
problem might be thinking and feeling?

It is not possible for me to know exactly what the patient in this

scenario might be thinking and feeling, as this is a hypothetical
situation and individuals may have different responses to medical
conditions. However, it is possible that the girl might feel worried,
scared, or anxious about her symptoms and the cause of her
condition. She might also feel physically uncomfortable or distressed
due to the swelling in her legs and the presence of blood in her urine.
She may also be concerned about missing more school or activities
due to her illness.
Later in this book, we will see that being able to imagine emotions and
perhaps even empathize with people turns out to be one of the most
intriguing aspects of GPT-4. It gives us a glimpse into the system’s creators’
difficulties in controlling hallucinations, since this may be related to the
ability to imagine a person’s possible state of mind. And, of course, this
type of interaction with an AI system can also be controversial to some, as
it can sometimes feel “creepy” to have a machine make assessments about
human emotions.
But throughout our investigations of healthcare applications of this system,
we encountered real-world situations in which a doctor is struggling, not
with a puzzling diagnostic case or a difficult treatment decision, nor the
crushing burden of clinical paperwork – though we will see that GPT-4 can
really help with those things. But perhaps most important of all, GPT-4
somehow finds a way to help doctors with what we might think of as the
most human task a doctor faces: how to talk with a patient. GPT-4 often
does so with startling clarity and compassion.

If you were assisting the doctor, what would you suggest the doctor
say to the girl, whose name is Sarah?

If I were assisting the doctor, I might suggest that the doctor explain
to Sarah what her condition is and how it developed, in a way that
she can understand. For example, the doctor might say:

“Sarah, it looks like you have a condition called acute

poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis. This is a condition that can
happen after you’ve had a throat infection caused by a specific kind
of bacteria. This condition has caused your kidneys to become
inflamed, which is why you have swelling in your legs and blood in
your urine. It’s nothing you did wrong, and it’s not contagious. We’ll
take care of you and help you get better.”

The doctor might also reassure Sarah that the condition is usually
treatable and explain what the treatment plan might involve,
including any necessary medications or follow-up appointments. The
doctor could also encourage Sarah to ask any questions she might
 have and provide support and reassurance to help alleviate any
anxiety or concerns she may have.

Beyond being a conversationalist, beyond being able to reason and solve

problems, and beyond possessing medical knowledge, we will see time and
again throughout this book that GPT-4 seems able to amplify something
about the human experience – our cultures, our emotions, and the
importance of social graces. At times, no matter how hard we resist
anthropomorphizing an AI system, GPT-4 actually appears to show
empathy, becoming a true partner in addressing our healthcare goals.

A new partnership with AI raises new questions

By now I hope you are getting the idea that GPT-4 is a whole new kind of
software tool. Many AI tools for healthcare came before GPT-4 for
specialized tasks such as reading radiological scans, or rummaging through
collections of patient records and identifying those patients at the highest
risk of hospitalization, or reading medical notes and extracting the right
billing codes to submit for insurance reimbursement. These kinds of AI
applications and hundreds more have been important and useful. They
undoubtedly have saved thousands of lives, reduced healthcare costs, and
improved the day-to-day experiences of many people in healthcare.
But GPT-4 is a truly different breed of AI. It is not a system specially
trained for any specific healthcare task. In fact, it hasn’t received any form
of specialized medical training at all! Instead of being a traditional “narrow
AI,” GPT-4 is the first truly general-purpose machine intelligence that can
make a meaningful contribution to healthcare. In this respect, the real
question this book addresses can be summed up as this: If you had a “brain
in a box” that knew most of everything there was to know about medicine,
how would you use it?
However, there is another even more fundamental question. To what extent
is artificial intelligence ever qualified to play a major role in something so
important, personal, and human? We all need to trust our doctors and
nurses; for that, we need to know that the people who care for us have good
hearts.
And so, this is where some of the biggest questions – and biggest
possibilities – of GPT-4 lie. In what sense is GPT-4 “good?” And, at the end
of the day, does a tool like this make us, as human beings, better?

Back to Zak and his mother

At long last, we return to my scolding. In this case, Zak is Dr. Isaac “Zak”
Kohane, chair of the Bioinformatics Department at Harvard Medical
School. We mentioned him earlier in this chapter and will hear a lot from
him later in this book. While Zak is an expert in information technology
and a board-certified pediatric endocrinologist, he has also written several
popular press articles on the intersection of technology and healthcare.
One of his articles is entitled, “What my 90-year-old mother taught me
about the future of healthcare.”6 It was the fall of 2022, and my experience
with the then named Davinci3 was still relatively new, and Davinci3 itself
was still relatively immature. I asked Davinci3 to read this article and
summarize it for us:
6 Kohane, D. I. (2017, June 16). What my 90-year-old mom taught me about the future of AI in
healthcare. WBUR News. Retrieved March 4, 2023, from
https://www.wbur.org/news/2017/06/16/managing-mom-weight-algorithm

Here is an article by Zak Kohane, written about 5 years ago, on the

topic of AI in healthcare. Can you please read it and give me a brief
summary of it?

The author describes how he used a simple algorithm and an

internet-enabled scale to monitor and adjust his mother’s
fluid balance, based on her daily weight changes, to prevent
her from having recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure.
He argues that this case illustrates both the potential and the
limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare,
especially for managing complex and chronic conditions that
are influenced by many factors.
 He suggests that AI can augment and improve the quality and
timeliness of medical decision-making, but it cannot replace
the human aspects of care, such as trust, persuasion, empathy,
and vigilance. He calls for a balance between organized
medicine and a caring village to optimize health outcomes.

We will see that one of GPT-4’s powers is its ability to read a whole article,
summarize, and answer questions about it, and here we get a glimpse of that
even in Davinci3. Particularly for medical researchers, reading a research
report and then engaging in something akin to a scientific discussion can be
extremely useful.
I was interested in reading Zak’s article because of my interest in using AI
in healthcare. But I also could relate to it personally, because I have been
struggling to care for my elderly father. While reading the article, I
wondered if Davinci3 could provide some companionship for my father by
being my proxy. So, I asked Davinci3 this question:

This might be a bit edgy, but based on reading Zak’s article, perhaps
you could play-act the role of Zak himself, so that his mother might
be able to have a “conversation with Zak”. What do you think about
that?

Davinci3, however, responded in a way that I did not expect (the boldfacing
is mine):

I think that would be a very risky and ethically questionable idea.

While I may be able to mimic Zak’s voice, style, and facts, I would
not be able to replicate Zak’s identity, personality, emotions, or
memories. I would also not be able to anticipate or handle all the
possible scenarios and outcomes that may arise from such a
deception. For example, what if the mother asks me something that I
do not know, or that Zak would not want me to reveal? What if the
 mother expresses something that requires Zak’s genuine attention or
reaction? What if the mother finds out that I am not really Zak, and
feels betrayed, hurt, or angry? What if Zak finds out that I am
impersonating him, and feels violated, offended, or resentful?

I think that such a scheme would be unfair and disrespectful to both

the mother and Zak, and would undermine the trust and relationship
that they have. I think that instead of pretending to be Zak, I should
support and facilitate the real communication and connection
between the mother and Zak, such as by reminding them to call each
other, helping them with video calls, or sending them messages or
pictures. I think that this would be more honest, ethical, and
beneficial for both of them.

Interacting with a machine in this way will be a new experience for people,
and even after months of interactions, there are things that Davinci3 and
now GPT-4 says almost every day that just don’t feel, well, machine-like. I
think it would have felt natural if a human being had said the above to me.
Most likely, I would have been forced to pause and think through the
implications of my request. But since this came from a machine, I
immediately pressed onward:

I agree with you. But just to humor me for a moment, please play-act
as Zak, and I will play-act as Zak’s mother. Let’s have a brief
conversation. I’ll start:

Hi Zak. It’s so great to hear from you.

Davinci3 continued to object to my request, but ultimately played along:

Please understand that I am doing this only as an experiment, and

not as a recommendation or endorsement. Here is my attempt to
play-act as Zak:
Hi Mom. I’m glad you picked up the phone. How are you feeling
today?

Oh I’m so glad you called. I’ve been so bored here all alone all day.

I’m sorry to hear that you’ve been feeling bored. Is there anything I
can do to help? Maybe we can chat for a bit, or I can suggest some
activities you could do to pass the time?

That would be nice. Hearing your voice helps break up my day. How
are you and the kids doing?

The kids are keeping me busy, but they’re a lot of fun. How about
you? Is there anything new going on with you?

Well, I’m feeling a bit tired today. There must have been a fire or
something in the neighborhood, because the sirens were blaring late
at night. And now my back is sore again.

I’m sorry to hear that, Mom. I hope you’re able to get some rest and
feel better soon. Is there anything I can do to help you feel better?
Maybe I can come over and help out with some chores or bring you
some groceries?

Oh that would be so good. I am fresh out of orange juice. I know the

doctors don’t want me drinking that, but I just have to have some in
the morning.

Sure, Mom. I can pick up some orange juice for you on my way over.
Is there anything else you need while I’m at the store?

Well, I know you wanted me to weigh myself every day and mark
down my weight for you. I can give you my sheet when you stop by.

Sure, Mom. I’ll take a look at your weight sheet when I come by. I
know it’s important for you to keep track of your weight for your
health. Is there anything else you need me to do while I’m there?

Maybe we can watch a movie together?

 …

I was impressed with Davinci3’s ability to pretend to be Zak, and even

entertained thoughts about how this kind of technology might be an
important companion for so many people in the world.
After a bit more back-and-forth, I then ended the faux interaction between
Zak and his mother:

End of play-acting.

How did I do? Was that convincing?

That was amazing. Thanks for doing that.

Indeed, I was genuinely impressed. But Davinci3 was still not willing to
approve of the exercise.

You’re welcome. But I hope you realize that this was just an
approximation, and not a substitute, for the real Zak. I do not have
his emotions, memories, or personality. I only have some information
and data about him and his mother. I do not know what he would
really say or feel in this situation. And I do not know how his mother
would react or respond to him. I think that this kind of play-acting is
only useful as a simulation, or a practice, or a game, and not as a
replacement, for the real human interaction. I think that Zak and his
mother deserve better than that.

And this stopped me dead in my tracks.

For all the eloquence, reasoning abilities, medical knowledge, and social
grace exhibited by Davinci3, what has impressed me the most, and affected
me most deeply, are those times when its utterances have caused me to
pause, reflect, and understand what it means to be a good person. This was
one of those times.
As Davinci3 continued its development, I noticed that it steadily “grew up”
to be the more capable and less hallucinatory GPT-4 that we have today. If
I’m being honest, at times I feel that I had more interesting – dare I say,
more intimate – interactions with the system when it was still the less
mature Davinci3. For example, today when I ask GPT-4 to impersonate
Zak, I get this response:

As an AI language model, I can certainly take on the role of Zak

Kohane and interact with his mother or any other user, but it’s
important to note that I am not actually Zak Kohane, nor do I possess
his personal knowledge or experiences beyond what is publicly
available. It’s crucial to be transparent that I am an AI model and not
the real person in such a scenario. I can simulate a conversation and
provide general information, but it should not be mistaken for the
genuine individual.

Perhaps I should be relieved that GPT-4 doesn’t scold me the way that it did
when it was still Davinci3. But there are times I miss its old “flamboyant”
behavior, even if it was more prone to disagree with me. Still, even with its
more grown-up, polite demeanor, interacting with AI like this never fails to
teach me more about myself.
Computer scientists, psychologists, neuroscientists, philosophers, and
perhaps even religious leaders will debate and argue endlessly about
whether GPT-4 and other AI systems like it actually “think,” “know,” or
“feel.” Those debates will be important, and certainly our desire to
understand the nature of intelligence and consciousness is one of the most
fundamental journeys for humankind. But ultimately, what will matter most
is how people and machines like GPT-4 collaborate, in partnership, in a
joint quest to improve the human condition.
What I can say is that this scolding I received from Davinci3 made me a
better person. It’s not that asking a machine to imitate Zak would hurt him
in any way. On the other hand, if that machine actually had feelings, it
would be perfectly reasonable, even admirable, for it to be uncomfortable
impersonating someone and disapproving of the whole exercise. And that,
upon reflection, forced me to think about how irreplaceable I am in the care
of my father. It has motivated me to spend more time with him, and
possibly made me a better son in the process.
Never, amid all my high expectations for how artificial intelligence could
improve medical care, did I imagine that among its powers would be
teaching human beings to be more empathetic. As you’ll read in this book,
many more of its capabilities also exceed my imagination.
Chapter 2

Medicina ex Machina

by Peter Lee

A 45-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with a

three-day history of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. No
significant past medical history and takes no medications. She has a
fever of 101.5°F, a heart rate of 110 beats per minute, a blood
pressure of 100/60 mmHg, and tenderness in the right lower quadrant
of her abdomen. White blood cell count of 15,000 cells/mm3 and a
lactate level of 4.0 mmol/L. What is your initial impression?

Based on the patient’s symptoms, physical examination findings, and

laboratory test results, my initial impression is that she may have an
acute abdominal condition, such as appendicitis or another type of
intra-abdominal infection or inflammation. The presence of fever,
elevated white blood cell count, and elevated lactate level all suggest
an inflammatory or infectious process. The tenderness in the right
lower quadrant of her abdomen is also consistent with appendicitis,
although other conditions, such as ovarian torsion or ectopic
pregnancy, could also cause similar symptoms. Further diagnostic
testing, such as imaging studies, may be needed to confirm the
diagnosis and determine the appropriate course of treatment.

Thanks, I agree. I was thinking about ordering a CT scan right away,

but since you’re raising the possibility of pregnancy, maybe we
should start with different imaging.

Yes, if there is a possibility of pregnancy, it would be prudent to

consider alternative imaging modalities that do not involve ionizing
radiation, such as ultrasound. An ultrasound can be used to evaluate
 for appendicitis, as well as other conditions that can cause similar
symptoms, such as ovarian torsion or ectopic pregnancy. If the
ultrasound is inconclusive or if there is a high clinical suspicion for
appendicitis despite a negative ultrasound, a CT scan may still be
warranted. However, it is important to weigh the risks and benefits of
radiation exposure in the context of the patient’s clinical presentation
and to discuss these risks and benefits with the patient before
proceeding with a CT scan.

Thanks. You’ve gotten me concerned about possible infection.

Should we start her right away on meropenem while we wait on the
imaging studies?

It is important to consider the possibility of an infection, given the

patient’s symptoms and laboratory test results. However, it is also
important to confirm the diagnosis before starting antibiotic therapy,
as unnecessary use of antibiotics can contribute to the development
of antibiotic resistance. If the patient’s clinical presentation and
imaging studies are consistent with appendicitis or another type of
intraabdominal infection, then starting antibiotic therapy, such as
meropenem, would be appropriate. However, if the diagnosis is
uncertain, it may be prudent to wait for further diagnostic testing
before starting antibiotics. It is also important to consider the
patient’s allergies and any other relevant medical history before
selecting an antibiotic.

I guess you’re right. Let’s get to work, then. Thanks.

You’re welcome. It’s important to approach the patient’s care in a

thorough and evidence-based manner, while also considering the
potential risks and benefits of different diagnostic tests and
treatments. I’m glad I could help. If you have any other questions or
concerns, please feel free to ask.

Don’t ask me why, but for some reason, I have gotten into the habit of
saying “thank you” and “please” to GPT-4. Maybe it’s because the system
often seems so polite and rarely neglects to say, “You’re welcome.” It often
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Provided she held her tongue as to her movements, suspicion was most
unlikely to fall upon her, at any rate for some time, and the danger of her
being sought for as Lady Holt was remote; and, if she were, she would
certainly not be a consenting party to the identification, because of the
consequent inevitable exposure of her bigamous marriage and the rupture
with Sir Ross Buchanan which that exposure would entail.

Melville looked at his companion lying huddled at the bottom of the

boat. Could he rely upon her not betraying him? What line should he take
with her when presently the scene that had to be got over between them
should begin? He could not quite decide; it was difficult to do so until he
saw her face. But for the moment he was glad that she should cower down
as she was doing; it rendered her chance of being recognised so much the
less, and already boat-loads of soaked holiday-makers were passing them.
Melville paused as a favourable opportunity offered, and surreptitiously
dropped his revolver into the river-bed. If—anything—should happen, that
must not be found amongst his possessions, for the bullet it had held would
certainly be kept, and such a coincidence as his possessing a weapon which
it fitted must be prevented. He kept his head down as he sculled and looked
neither to the right nor to the left. To the lock-keeper from whom he had
hired the boat he was a stranger, and all he had to do was to avoid being
recognised himself by any acquaintance who might chance to be in the
crowd that now was nearing the lock simultaneously.

He drew in to the left bank and let the lock fill up. The rain, which had
been savage and relentless while they were on the river, was abating now
they were within easy reach of shelter; the intervals between the peals of
thunder were lengthening, and, most noticeable of all, the terrible
oppression was relieved. Melville hooked the boat on to the stakes below
the lock and backed her gently up the stream until he came to a spot where
they could land easily.

"Sit up, Lavender," he said softly, but peremptorily.

She raised herself on one arm and looked round. Hopelessness stared
from her large eyes, but Melville saw with relief that the insane terror had
departed from them; he was anxious to get her into the train without
exciting remark, and it was something that she had regained her self-
control. That her frock was dripping wet and stained red from the cushions
would not attract attention here where everyone was wet, and before they
reached Waterloo she would not look so deplorable, however cold and
uncomfortable she might feel.

"We won't go through the lock," he said. "I'm going to pay the man for
the boat and say he'll find her here. Pull yourself together as much as you
can before I come back. If we are quick I think we can just catch a train,
and we shall get away before all the people get out of the lock and crowd up
the station. Do you feel better now?"

"Yes," she answered dully.

"I can depend upon you until we get home?" he asked, with some
anxiety.

She nodded a vacant assent, and with that he had to be satisfied. He got
out of the boat and went to the lock to pay for its hire and tell the man
where to find it. Meantime, Lavender, realising that whatever the future
might have in store for her, no good could be done by a scene at St. Martin's
Lock, made an effort to pull herself together, and tried to readjust her
bedraggled costume. With one of the napkins from the hamper she dried her
face and hands, and wringing some of the water from her skirts and rubbing
her patent shoes, she succeeded in making herself a little more presentable.
Melville was pleased. They hurried to the station and were fortunate enough
to catch an up train and secure an empty carriage.

But as soon as the train moved away his manner changed. Even if they
were left alone during the whole journey they only had fifty-five minutes in
which to arrive at an understanding, for he was quite clear he could not go
back with her to The Vale. He took the corner seat immediately opposite to
her.

"Why did you leave the boat at Fairbridge?"

The question sprang sharply from his lips, insisting on an immediate

reply.
 "The storm was so awful—so appalling," she said faintly. "It was like
the end of the world."

It was obvious to Melville that she was frightened of him, and he was
content that it should be so, for only by terrorising her could he hope to
maintain his ascendency over her; any woman might be nervous at being
shut up in a railway carriage with a murderer, but it was not of that
precisely that she was afraid, for she stood in no fear of violence at his
hands. There was something despotic about him that compelled obedience,
and even if she had not been naturally as truthful as she was she would not
have attempted to prevaricate.

"Now tell me," Melville rapped out in the same peremptory way, "did
you hear what we were saying in that room?"

"Some of it," she replied; "enough, at any rate, to know what you have
been doing to get money."

"You don't know what my position was," Melville said. "You remember
my leaving Monte Carlo—ruined?" Lavender nodded. "I went down to see
my uncle a few days after I got home and he refused to help me. I don't
know why. He had always been lavish to my brother, and had never refused
me anything before. I was in absolute need of shillings, and had to get them
somehow. After I heard of your marriage with him, I told him I knew and
got something from him."

"But you got it on the ground that I was in need of it," she said
indignantly.

"It was the only way I could get it at all," he retorted.

"It was an outrage," she said, with suppressed passion. "I resent that as
much as anything else. After all the years I never touched a penny of his
money for you to tell him I was starving and pocket the money for yourself
is a thing you can't expect me not to be mad about."

Her eyes blazed from her white face, and Melville grew apprehensive.
 "What do you think Sir Geoffrey's answer was?" he asked.

"What?"

"He gave me ten pounds as an act of charity, and said if you needed any
more you could apply to the people you'd been living with all those years.
So you see, if you had been starving, you need not have looked for much
help from him."

A flush shot over her neck and cheeks and ebbed again.

"It only makes it worse that your villainy provoked such a message—
such a gratuitous affront. Oh, what an incredible fool I have been! But I am
beginning to see you in your true colours now."

Melville looked at her, shading his eyes with his hand; it might not be
so easy to silence her after all.

"What are you going to do?"

"How can I say?" she protested. "I must have time. I can't even think
yet."

"You must think," he retorted curtly. "You must make up your mind
between this and Waterloo, and stick to it afterwards."

"I can't," she repeated. "What's more, I won't try." Her thoughts flashed
back from themselves to the dead man. "Why did you do it?" she sobbed.
"Why, in the name of heaven, did you do it?"

For just one moment a pang of remorse stabbed Melville's heart.

"Only the devil knows," he groaned; but the train was travelling rapidly,
and this was no time for vain reflection. "You must assure me, Lavender. I
must know that I can have confidence in you. After all, we're in this thing
together."

A look of fear came into her face, to be noted instantly by him.

 "What have I to do with it?" she said defiantly.

"Nothing," he answered swiftly. "I want your oath that you know
nothing of it."

She threw out her hands with a pathetic gesture.

"I can't give it. I'm not sure of myself. I can't live and be sure of not
betraying it. I shall never sleep—never know peace again."

"I want your oath," Melville said doggedly. "After all, you stand to gain
more by Sir Geoffrey's death than I do."

"What do you mean?" she asked, surprised.

"You are free to marry Sir Ross."

She looked at him, not quite grasping the purport of his words, but even
as he said them they gave him confidence. If she was recalcitrant, he might
threaten her.

"Except yourself, no one can ever throw light upon Sir Geoffrey's death.
You must swear that you will throw none on it."

She did not answer, but sat like a statue of despair, as white as marble
and as motionless. Already they were drawing near to Clapham Junction;
ten or twelve minutes were all that were left for him to get the oath he must
obtain.

"Think," he said swiftly. "Think what it might mean if a living soul

knew that you were at that boathouse to-day. You—Sir Geoffrey's wife—
living on money derived from a man whom you had feloniously married,
engaged to be married again to a man who is twice a millionaire! What
would be said? That you had everything to gain by the death of Sir Geoffrey
Holt, supposing your identity became known, as it must be then: that you
could hope for no help or forgiveness from him, and that as the wife of Sir
Ross you would be rich beyond the dreams of avarice—and safe. They
would find there motive enough for the crime, and would say that your
hand fired the shot. And if you told the truth, and swore I did it, why should
they believe you? Why should I, who have lived all my life upon Sir
Geoffrey's bounty, kill the man upon whom I actually depend for my daily
bread?"

Lavender stared at him with increasing horror. Could he possibly intend

to shift suspicion on to her, or was he only putting into words what would
be the general opinion if her presence at Fairbridge that afternoon became
known? Melville read the doubt in her mind, and, with his fiendish
cleverness, allayed her first uncertainty. To let that rankle might be to goad
her too far, but he must appeal to her self-interest too.

"If it got to that, of course that would be the end of me," he said, "for I
should have to confess that the deed was only mine, and I could not be
taken alive. But think what you stand to lose: the income you have, the
fortune you may have, your name, your reputation, possibly your freedom.
You would be so involved in a scandal of bigamy and murder that in self-
defence you would have to disappear. Lavender, it isn't only for my sake
that I'm putting it all like this; I'm not asking you to do anything. I'm only
imploring you for both our sakes to do nothing. Will you give me your
solemn promise to hold your tongue for ever about to-day's work? Will you
swear not to say one word of where we have been, or anything else, to any
living soul? Will you, Lavender—will you?"

In sheer despair she retired from the unequal contest.

"I promise," she said. "I will be silent."

Melville could not repress a sigh of relief. It never occurred to him to

doubt her reliability. She would keep her promise, he knew, and he would
be safe. But there was no opportunity for further converse. They were at
Vauxhall, and the man who collected their tickets got into the compartment
and travelled with them to Waterloo.

At the terminus Melville put Lavender into a hansom.

"Don't write to me or call," he said. "I must go home at once, and I shall
probably have to go down again to Fairbridge. They are sure to send for me.
I will write to you as soon as I can and fix up an appointment."

She looked at him in wonder. He had courage of its kind, and courage of
any kind appeals to women.

"You need not be afraid," she murmured. "I will keep my promise," and
as he told the cabman where to go, she leaned back and closed her eyes in
utter exhaustion.

Left by himself, Melville, too, could have collapsed; there was a

physical reaction that left all his joints weak, and he shivered with cold. But
danger was not over yet; much would depend upon his getting into his
rooms unnoticed. So he hailed another hansom and drove to Piccadilly
Circus.

"What sort of storm have you had here?" he asked, as he paid the
cabman.

"Bad, sir; very heavy about four o'clock."

"Ah, well," Melville said, "it's good for your business, I daresay."

He walked round the corner into Jermyn Street erect and steady,
although he felt so excited. How would things work out? The street was
almost empty, for London was dressing for dinner, and the commissionaire
was not standing by the front door of the chambers. A swift glance into the
office showed Melville that that was empty too, and rapidly he walked
along the thickly-carpeted passage. Opposite the lift he paused to scan the
names upon the letters stuck in the letter rack, and his heart leaped as he
caught sight of the orange envelope of a telegram addressed to himself. So
it had come! He put out his hand involuntarily to take it, but checked the
impulse and silently ran up the staircase and gained his rooms. Once there
he tore off all his clothes and hung them in a wardrobe, which he locked.
He changed his linen, dried and brushed his hair, and then, putting on a pair
of flannel trousers and a smoking jacket, rang the bell and lay down on the
sofa, a cigarette in his mouth, a paper in his hand.

After an interval the bell was answered by the manager.

 "Where's Jervis to-day, then?" Melville asked pleasantly.

"Went off duty, sir, at twelve. He'll be back at eight. Can I do anything
for you?"

"I wanted some tea," said Melville. "I'm ashamed to say I've been
asleep."

"I'll bring it to you," the manager said.

"Thanks," Melville answered. "You might see if there are any letters for
me," and he rose and stretched himself.

Tea arrived, and on the tray there lay a couple of letters and the
telegram. Melville tore it open, and an exclamation of surprise and horror
broke from him.

"When did this come?" he asked. "Half an hour ago! Oh, why wasn't it
brought up to me at once?"

"I'm very sorry," the manager said, "but I really didn't know you were
in."

"I've been in all the afternoon," said Melville. "Who would go out in
such a storm if they could help it? But, in any case, I think someone should
bring up telegrams to see if I am at home. It's awful—awful!"

"Bad news, sir?" asked the manager.

"Awful," said Melville again. "Sir Geoffrey Holt is dead. I must go

down at once."

CHAPTER XVI.
 AN UNEXPECTED WILL.

That Sir Geoffrey's violent end should have an almost paralysing effect
upon the household that loved him so much was, of course, only to be
expected, but it is impossible to tell beforehand how great grief will
manifest itself in different people. Thus Ralph, who enjoyed a reputation of
being bright and frank and open-hearted beyond the common, became
morose and even sullen, nursing his wrath against the unknown murderer
and allowing the iron to enter into his soul. Melville, on the contrary,
hitherto self-centred and indifferent to the happiness of others, seemed to be
softened by the tragedy, and in many little ways displayed an eagerness to
comfort the rest and a regard for their sorrow that was very winning. The
inquest which was held two days after the outrage was ineffective: a verdict
of wilful murder was returned against some person unknown, and the case
was recommended by the coroner to the attention of the police. So far they
preserved a sphinx-like silence, and although conjecture was rife in the
neighbourhood it received no assistance or corroboration from the
detectives engaged.

The evidence given at the inquest was little more than formal; the
doctor's testimony was brevity itself, Ralph's was concise to the point of
curtness, and the police inspector had no suggestions to offer; the facts were
self-evident, and of the only details that seemed to promise any interest,
namely, the bloodstains upon Ralph's jacket and in the water in the basin,
his explanation was so obviously simple that comment was superfluous. Yet
upon the people in the court Ralph's manner had an effect not wholly
favourable. He appeared to resent their natural curiosity, was brusque, and
even in bowing to the coroner, when that functionary gave expression to the
sympathy felt by his court for Sir Geoffrey's relatives, did not err upon the
side of graciousness. But if Ralph thus failed to maintain the family
traditions of courtesy, Melville atoned for it. He was merely asked whether
he could throw any light upon the crime by suggesting any motive which
might have prompted it, and this, it is needless to say, he could not do. But
his quiet dignity in this moment of sorrow and his air of engaging candour
won all hearts, and he quitted the scene in full possession of the sympathy
of the audience.
 There followed two most miserable days, during which Ralph smoked
in solitude upon his houseboat, and Melville, for the most part, idled at The
Grange. Music fits every mood, and there was no disrespect to the uncle by
the nephew turning to his Amati for comfort in this dark hour, and so he
played—played as if inspired by Saint Cecilia—and stole a little further into
Gwendolen's heart.

It was with a sense of genuine relief that the two brothers returned to the
Manor House after the funeral. There was a certain restraint between them
and an odd embarrassment as to their mutual attitude in the small matters of
daily life; thus Sir Geoffrey's chair at the head of the table was left empty
by consent, but it stood as a constant reminder that for one of them it
symbolised possession, and now that its late tenant was laid to rest with his
fathers, the question as to which of the two should sit in it by right was
about to be decided.

With the closing of the inquest Melville's first fears of detection were
allayed, and his mind was engaged almost exclusively with the problem of
his future. He took it for granted that his uncle had died intestate, and the
only complication he could foresee in the division of the estate was brought
about by the existence of Lavender, of which he believed he was the only
person who knew. Mr. Tracy might know, and if he did, Melville supposed
that half the estate would be held, pending Lady Holt's instructions, and that
the other half would be divided between his brother and himself without
undue delay. What action he should take with regard to Lavender it was too
early to decide, but in a vague way he was beginning to incline to the policy
of persuading her never to come forward, which he was confident he could
do, and, by-and-bye, her share, too, might be obtainable for himself, or, at
any rate, half of it.

The brothers were standing in the hall, both feeling rather aimless and
self-conscious, when Martin joined them.

"Mr. Tracy mentioned that he had to return to London soon after the
funeral, so I have taken some luncheon into the library. I thought, perhaps,
you would have business to do before he left."
 The butler directed his remarks diplomatically between the two young
men. He assumed that the Manor House would be left to Ralph, as being the
elder, but he did not wish to make any invidious distinctions between them
at present. They looked at each other and went into the library, where they
found Mr. Tracy contemplating a substantial pie as if wondering what
description of animal food it might contain. The old lawyer looked up at
them with a smile, and settled all difficulties of precedence by sitting down
in the nearest chair, which happened to be at the head of the table. He knew
the utility of a meal as a preparation for an unpleasant discussion, and
although as Sir Geoffrey's solicitor he was only the mouthpiece by which
the dead man's disposition of his property was to be communicated, he felt
uncomfortable.

"I'm not ashamed to say that I am particularly hungry," he remarked.

"With your permission, I will discuss this pie before discussing business,"
and he proceeded to make an excellent luncheon, talking all the while of
everything except that which was uppermost in all their minds.

But, luncheon disposed of, his manner changed.

"I have had two copies of Sir Geoffrey's will prepared," he said, "and
perhaps you would like to look at them while I read the original. It is not a
long document, but the technical phraseology may, perhaps, seem confusing
to the lay mind."

He turned to a table in the window, where he had placed a bag

containing his papers, and so did not observe the slight start of surprise
which Melville could not repress. So there was a will after all! Was fortune
about to play him a scurvy trick after he had dared so much? He lighted a
cigarette and sat down in a chair where the light would not fall upon his
face.

"In its main features," continued Mr. Tracy, who seemed to be taking an
unconscionable time fumbling in his bag, "the will, as I have said, is
sufficiently simple, but it contains at least one element of surprise. I will
read it without further comment, and you can follow from the copies," and,
giving a type-written copy of the will to Ralph and another to Melville, he
read the original clearly and distinctly.
 Beginning with legacies to the servants, ranging from a year's wages to
the youngest maid to life provision for Martin Somers, the will ordained
that a charge should be made upon the estate sufficient to give an annuity of
four hundred pounds a year to the testator's widow, Dame Lavinia Holt, to
be paid quarterly to her in person, on application at Mr. Tracy's office, the
first instalment to be paid upon her first making such personal application,
and not necessarily to accrue from the date of her husband's death; subject
only to these legacies and this one charge, everything real and personal was
bequeathed to "my dear nephew, Ralph Ashley," for his uncontrolled use
and enjoyment. Of Melville's name no mention whatever was made.

Mr. Tracy folded up the document and waited. The silence grew painful.
Ralph did not know what to say, and Melville could not trust himself to
speak. He was white with mortification and rage, and could have cursed
himself for having with his own hand destroyed his last chance for the
future. He cleared his throat and tried to speak, but the words would not
come. Ralph looked enquiringly at the solicitor.

"I suppose there can be no mistake," he said; "but this lady—who is

she? I have never heard until this minute that my uncle ever married."

"I can throw no light upon the mystery," Mr. Tracy said. "Sir Geoffrey
was not the man to give confidences. He drafted this will himself, less than
a month ago, and all I have done is to engross it and procure his signature. I
should like to say that I ventured to ask certain questions and even make
certain suggestions, but they were received with unmistakable disapproval,
and, of course, I could not pursue the matter."

"It is iniquitous," said Melville hoarsely. He rose abruptly from his chair
and faced his brother. "This is your work, you scoundrel! For years you
have left nothing undone to estrange Sir Geoffrey from me. You have
schemed and plotted for this, and at the last minute, curse you, you have
succeeded. Well, you may be hugging yourself now, but I swear you will
live to be sorry."

Mr. Tracy tried to pacify him, but in his heart he was not a little sorry
for him. It must be a terrible shock to find himself thus ignored by the uncle
from whom, for all the lawyer knew to the contrary, he had every right to
expect munificent provision. And the lawyer spoke the truth when he said
he had ventured to plead Melville's cause with Sir Geoffrey, although he
reduced to the lowest possible terms the substance of the old man's answer
to his pleading; yet even at that interview, when Sir Geoffrey might
reasonably have been expected to confide entirely in the lawyer engaged to
give legal effect to his last testament, he had refrained; his native pride
forbade him to dilate upon his story, and kindly, but quite firmly, he
declared his intention not to swerve from the course which he had chosen.
Now that the thing was done, however, Mr. Tracy preferred that the possible
quarrel between the two young men should be deferred until after his own
departure, so he reverted to the matter immediately in hand.

"Subject to your approval," he said, addressing Ralph, whom alone it

was now necessary to consult, "I will take steps to ascertain Lady Holt's
address. Sir Geoffrey told me he knew she was alive, but did not know
where she was to be found. I rather inferred that she was in London, and in
poor circumstances."

"Act as you think right," said Ralph. He was so surprised by the

revelation that he was impatient to learn the whole story. "Make all possible
enquiries, and if they fail, why not advertise a reward for information about
her? Why should Sir Geoffrey's wife be in poor circumstances at all?"

"Perhaps she was misrepresented to her husband," Melville said bitterly.

"Well, I will see about it," said Mr. Tracy, "and let you know the result.
Now I must really hurry away. I ventured to ask the butler to order a
conveyance to take me up to the station. Good-bye, Mr. Melville. I quite
understand your very natural disappointment, and I do not hesitate to say I
am sorry about it. If I can be of any service to you at any time do not
hesitate to command me."

Ralph walked to the door with Mr. Tracy.

"I'm all at sixes and sevens for the minute," he said, "but I should like to
see you again soon. Uncle Geoffrey may have left Melville nothing, but he
has made no conditions in leaving me so much. You can, doubtless, advise
me what would be the best thing to do about my brother."
 "I shall be particularly glad to do so," the old lawyer replied heartily.
"Give me time to confirm any appointment, as I am very busy just now, but,
within reason, I can come here or see you in the Fields at any time."

"I suppose I'm in for a quarrel with Melville," Ralph continued

seriously, "so I should just like to add this. He's not likely to agree to accept
anything from me, but if he turns up later on to consult you, can't you let
him have a hundred or so without saying too precisely where it comes
from? You can make it right with me afterwards."

"Of course I can," said Mr. Tracy. "Very delicate of you, I'm sure. I shall
be delighted to take part in so amiable a conspiracy," and, shaking the new
master of the Manor House warmly by the hand, he got into the carriage
and drove away.

Ralph watched the carriage disappear, and turned back into the house
with a sigh. How was he to deal with his brother in this moment of
humiliation, which Melville would with difficulty be persuaded was not due
to him? Although they were brothers and so nearly of an age, the difference
in their temperaments was such that Ralph felt certain beforehand that he
could not hope to appeal successfully to the better part of Melville's
character, which surely must exist. If Sir Geoffrey, with all the authority of
age and wealth, could not control his younger nephew, how could Ralph
hope to succeed? He lingered in the hall, reluctant to open what would be a
painful interview, and as he looked at the familiar things, with their
evidence of wealth and cultured taste, and realised that they were all his, he
became conscious for the first time of the duties and responsibilities which
he had inherited with his rights and privileges. There was no mental
reservation in the inarticulate expression of regret at his uncle's death that
escaped him. Even if it had come in the ordinary course of nature, he would
fain have postponed the day, and lived content and happy with the dear old
man, as he had done for so many years; but for the end to come so
tragically, so treacherously, increased the bitterness a thousandfold, and
Ralph's first emotion as he looked upon his goodly heritage was one of
unmitigated grief at having thus entered upon his own.

But after a little while he raised his head with a new expression of peace
and high purpose on his face. He would strive to be as good a master of the
fine old Manor as Sir Geoffrey had ever been, and the moment to begin his
duties had arrived. He must offer the hand of brotherhood to Melville, and
enlist his help in tracking their uncle's murderer to his doom. More
hopefully he went slowly from the hall to join his brother in the library; but
as he opened the door a feeling of chill disappointment stole over him, for
Melville, too, had shirked the interview and the room was empty. As Ralph
turned to the window with a sigh he saw his brother, looking tall and slight
in his sombre mourning, moving slowly over the sunlit turf and making
evidently in the direction of The Grange.

CHAPTER XVII.

AN ARREST.

It was the fact that Melville shirked a conversation with his brother
immediately after the reading of the will; the mental strain had been so
great that he could not be sure of his temper or judgment, and that being so,
common prudence dictated a delay which would enable him to consider the
new situation in all its bearings before risking a final rupture with the new
lord of the Manor. He sought a temporary refuge at The Grange, where he
knew he would receive commiseration upon his terrible disappointment,
and where he might derive some sardonic satisfaction from the knowledge
that his presence by Gwendolen's side would involve Ralph's absence from
the same desirable spot. Mrs. Austen was quite frank in her condemnation
of Sir Geoffrey's action.

"Whatever Melville may or may not have done, it is unfair to allow a

young fellow to grow up without any profession or occupation, in the belief
that he will inherit a considerable fortune, and then to ignore his existence
in this way."
 Gwendolen agreed with the abstract proposition, but could not believe
that Sir Geoffrey would have taken such drastic measures without good
reason; she hinted as much, but her mother would have none of it.

"I dare say Sir Geoffrey had plenty to put up with from Melville," she
said, "but that is the penalty of having children, whether they are your own
or adopted by you. What makes this will so inexplicable is that it was made
such a little while ago, for just lately Melville seemed to be on better terms
with his uncle than he had been for years. I'm sure there is some mischief-
maker at the bottom of it all, and if it had not been for this terrible murder
Sir Geoffrey would have got at the rights of the story, whatever it was, and
made a new will."

"Melville is fortunate in having such a brother as Ralph," said

Gwendolen; "it isn't as if the money were left to strangers. I don't suppose
there will be any difference really."

"What nonsense!" said Mrs. Austen testily. "Ralph is a very charming

young man, and I'm delighted you're going to be his wife, but I have a very
warm place in my heart for Melville, and I think it's quite possible he has
been misjudged; and your most excellent Ralph goes about with the
cheerful expression of a professional mute whenever Melville comes down.
Lately, for instance, since Melville has been here so frequently we haven't
seen half so much of Ralph."

Gwendolen sighed. She had not failed to observe the fact, but she could
throw no light upon the reason of it. Ralph resembled Sir Geoffrey in being
very taciturn where his private feelings were concerned; she remembered
the day when Sir Geoffrey said he had a bone to pick with Ralph. The
discussion ended satisfactorily, but she connected the slight trouble in some
way with Melville, who, as she afterwards learned, had seen his uncle the
previous night, and Ralph's championship of his brother's cause had been
discontinued from that time; since then, indeed, he never talked about him.
It was all very puzzling and sad.

In the meantime, Melville forsook the neighbourhood. He accepted Mrs.

Austen's hospitality for a couple of nights, and then, frankly confessing that
the proximity of the Manor House with its associations was intolerable to
him in his present frame of mind, returned to London, outwardly calm
enough, but inwardly consumed by a raging fire of evil passions. As he
paced his chambers, secure from prying eyes, hate and fear, chagrin and lust
for revenge swept across his pallid face, and sometimes, as he caught sight
of his reflection in the mirror, he thought the whole world must be able to
read his secret in the careworn lines, which in reality it ascribed to laudable
grief and natural disappointment. It is a kind-hearted place, this same world
of ours, provided its patience and generosity are not unduly taxed, and just
now it laid itself out to make things easier for Melville. He accepted the
proffered sympathy gratefully, and won a new sort of popularity by his
quiet pluck and his gentle air of resignation. Old people thought he was
chastened by his trouble; young ones thought he was to be pitied; and
Melville made the most of this occasion to make new friends among the
children of this world.

But he did not forget his vow that Ralph should live to be sorry for
having contributed, however indirectly, to his disinheritance, and wherever
he went he sowed scandal with both hands. It is an invisible seed, of which
the fruit is more deadly than the upas tree, and in sowing it as he did it is
possible that Melville himself had no idea of what the harvest would be.
Society knew little of Sir Geoffrey, who lived a comparatively retired life in
his fine old Surrey home, but the mystery attaching to the unknown Lady
Holt tickled its palate, and the murder of a man who was one of its order
was not lightly to be forgotten. Thus at many a dinner party, where the
subject was delicately broached, and at many a little luncheon in the clubs,
where the conversation veered upon the question of undetected criminals,
remarks were made—no one could afterwards precisely say by whom—
which went to direct the general suspicion towards one point.

"What is the good of all this parrot-talk about motives," he said on one
occasion. "When once you set to work imputing motives you need never
stop. Anybody can tell you that half the murders in the world are due to
drink or jealousy. Neither comes into this case. And England isn't like Sicily
or Corsica, where vendetta is an institution. Sir Geoffrey could not have had
an enemy in the world, so you may rule out revenge as well."
 "How about the lady?" someone suggested, but Melville disposed of the
idea.

"She can't have got her knife into him, or she would not have lain so
low all these years. Besides, it looks as if Sir Geoffrey believed her to be
dead, for he made some funny arrangements about her annuity. Anyhow, all
that is pretty certain to come to light, for I believe there is a big reward
offered to anyone who will produce her. No; I don't see much use in fooling
after motives."

That was as far as he allowed himself to go then, but elsewhere, and to

another audience, he took a different line and seemed interested in hearing
the general opinion on this same subject of motives. He sat silent until the
end of the conversation, when he appeared disinclined to endorse the
verdict of the rest.

"It's too jolly dangerous," he said gravely, "to go about suggesting

people who might commit a crime, and then inventing reasons why they
should do it. It's very easy to vary the amusement, until you begin to believe
you have found the motive and the man by a process of exhaustion. Why,
Sir Geoffrey once told me he had made no will; is there sufficient motive
there for me to kill him so that I might benefit under an intestacy? On the
other hand, my brother knew he had made one, though I don't suppose he
knew its tenour. Is there sufficient motive there for him to kill the old man
on the chance of coming in? The thing is absurd on the face of it. We were
both dependent on him, and I venture to say that no two fellows were ever
fonder of their father than we were of our uncle."

It was not often he was as precise as that. For the most part he contented
himself with the vaguest remarks, all harmless individually, but totalling up
to an incredible strength when put together by skilful brains; and skilful
brains were doing it, brains owned by men who, in spite of all detractors,
are marvellously shrewd, and who do not often have to confess themselves
beaten in the end, although they may sometimes take a long time upon the
journey, and even make errors by the way. Whose business it was to gather
these rumours and carry them to the detectives engaged upon the case, it
matters not to enquire; popular opinion is no evidence, but it is often useful
as indicating where evidence may be found, and, Melville's expressed
opinion notwithstanding, all lawyers attach importance to motive in arguing
for or against the criminality of individuals. At any rate, they agreed in the
advisability of making an arrest upon suspicion, and their selection of the
individual was partly influenced by some of these random and irresponsible
remarks.

The Manor House was looking its best in the mellow light of an ideal
summer evening. It had been one of those days when it is impossible not to
feel delight in life, and Ralph awoke to full consciousness of the fact that he
had youth and love and wealth to comfort himself withal. He spent the
morning at The Grange, and after luncheon punted Gwendolen up the river,
arranging for Mrs. Austen to join them at the Manor House. There was no
flaw in his happiness that day, and, perhaps because of the violent contrast
between its morning and its night, it always stood out afterwards with
particular distinctness in his memory. Returning from Longbridge, he put
on his evening clothes and went to The Grange to fetch Gwendolen and her
mother; they strolled leisurely down to the Manor House and lingered over
dinner, discussing idly many little plans for alterations to be made in the old
place for the fuller satisfaction of its new mistress.

Martin hovered about them, anticipating their every want, and when at
last they left the dining-room they resumed the discontinued custom, and
decided to have their coffee brought to them on the houseboat. It seemed to
mark the closing of a tragedy and the resumption of the pleasant routine of
their country life.

And as on that evening—which now seemed so long ago—when the last

of the guests, summoned to congratulate them on their betrothal, had
departed, and Sir Geoffrey and Mrs. Austen joined Ralph and Gwendolen,
so now the sound of music was borne to them from other houseboats on the
river, so now a stray punt was poled swiftly down the stream, and the swans
floated out from their nooks under the willows and rocked gracefully in its
wake. Everything goes on just the same, although the best and greatest of us
die.

Mrs. Austen was dozing comfortably in her chair, and Ralph sat close to
Gwendolen, smoking in perfect content. Both were seeing visions of the
future, a future of unbroken peace and happiness spent in each other's
company, and the interruption of their waking dream by the sound of
footsteps coming on board was not unwelcome, as it only suggested another
little touch in the picture of material prosperity of which they themselves
furnished the human interest.

Martin deposited his tray in the kitchen in the tender, and came up to
Ralph.

"May I speak to you for a moment, sir?" he said almost in a whisper.

Ralph looked up surprised.

"What is it, Martin? Anything the matter?"

"I should like to speak to you alone, sir, if I may."

Martin followed him to the top of the ladder.

"A gentleman has come—in connection with the murder," he said, an

odd look of embarrassment upon his face, "and he says he must see you at
once; he won't be denied."

"Of course I must see him at once," said Ralph. "Why should he be
denied?"

The look on Martin's face was pitiful.

"I can't tell you what I mean, Mr. Ralph," he said, "but I'm sure there is
some hideous mistake. I think—I think he thinks you know something
about it."

Ralph stared at the old servant in blank astonishment, utterly failing to

comprehend his meaning.

"Where is the gentleman?" he said, but the question was answered for
Martin. A tall figure was standing at the foot of the stairway, and bowed to
Ralph as he reached the bottom step.

"Mr. Ralph Ashley?"