Academic Task Number: 1

Course code: MGN200M Course title: Career Planning II

Date of allotment: 13 February, 2024 Date of submission: 29 February, 2024
Maximum Marks: 30 Course instructor: Dr. Deepak Bisht
Academic Task Type: Offline Nature: Individual

Detail of Academic Task Course Bloom’s Maximum

Outcome level Marks
Objective of the Assignment:
To leverage opportunities and accelerate personal
development for right position.
L3: 30
Task: Each student will select 5 companies related to their CO2, Apply
respective cohort. The student has to do SWOT analysis CO3 L4:
based on these 5 companies and identify key areas of Analyze
improvement to work upon in the rest of the semester.

The evaluation parameters are as follows:

1. Identification of profile and company selection- 5 marks
2. Skills identified for profile and company- 5 Marks
3. Comparative analysis among companies- 10 Marks
4. SWOT analysis of self vs organization- 5 marks
5. Identification of areas of improvement – 5 marks

Instructions -

 Any excuses for non-submission shall not be entertained.

 It is an individual assignment.
 Simply copying of the details from any source would result in awarding of zero.
 Use Times New Roman, Font Size 12, and line spacing 1.5.
 Rubrics
CATEGORY 1 2
Identification of Excellent (5 marks):
profile and
company selection -
5 Marks: Accurately identifies and
provides a clear
description of the relevant
industry and job profile,
demonstrating a deep
understanding of its
characteristics and
significance.
Skills identified for Excellent (5 marks):
profile and
company- 5 Marks:
Identifies a
comprehensive set of
skills necessary for
success in the industry
and desired position.
Comparative Excellent (10 marks):
analysis among
companies - 10
Marks: Demonstrates a perfect
comparative analysis
between the identified
companies and the
industry's requirements,
providing clear and well-
supported reasoning.
Excellent (5 marks):
SWOT analysis of
self vs organization- Accurately identifies
5 Marks: relevant strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities
and threats of self vs
organisation.
Identification of Excellent (5 marks):
areas of
improvement - 5
Marks: The self-exploration
report is exceptionally
well-structured,
insightful, and effectively
communicates the areas
of improvement.
3 4 5 Points
awarded
Good (4 marks): Satisfactory (3 Needs Improvement Poor (1 mark):
marks): (2 marks):
Accurately identifies Fails to accurately
job profile and relevant Identifies the profile Identifies the profile identify the
industry and also and industry with some and industry with relevant industry
provides a reasonable inaccuracies or lacks a significant inaccuracies and job profile
description, showing a clear description, or fails to provide a and provides an
solid understanding of indicating a basic clear description, inadequate
its characteristics. understanding of its demonstrating a limited description,
characteristics. understanding of its showing a lack of
characteristics. understanding of
its characteristics.
Good (4 marks): Satisfactory (3 Needs Improvement Poor (1 marks):
marks): (2 marks):
Identifies a majority of Fails to identify
relevant skills Identifies some Identifies only a few significant skills.
necessary for success in relevant skills but may relevant skills and may
the industry and desired lack depth or overlook exhibit limited self-
position. a few important traits. awareness.
Good (8 marks): Satisfactory (5 Needs Improvement Poor (2 marks):
marks): (3 marks):
Establishes a strong Fails to establish a
alignment between Shows a reasonable Demonstrates a limited meaningful
companies with sound match between match between connection
reasoning. companies with some identified companies between amongst
valid reasoning points. with weak or companies lacking
insufficient reasoning valid reasoning.
Good (4 marks): Satisfactory (3 Needs Improvement Poor (1 mark):
marks): (2 marks):
Identifies most of the Does not identify
strengths, weaknesses, Identifies few Identifies a few relevant strengths,
opportunities and strengths, weaknesses, strengths, weaknesses, weaknesses,
threats of self vs opportunities and opportunities and opportunities and
organisation threats of self vs threats of self vs threats of self vs
organisation. organisation. organisation.
Good (4 marks): Satisfactory (3 Needs Improvement Poor (1 mark):
marks): (2 marks):
The self-exploration The self-
report is well- The self-exploration The self-exploration exploration report
structured, insightful, report is adequately report lacks proper is poorly
and effectively structured and structure and may not structured, lacks
communicates the areas satisfactorily effectively insight, and does
of improvement. communicates areas of communicate the areas not effectively
improvement. of improvement. communicate the
areas of
improvement.
 Formats

 PART-1 & 2 Identification of profile and industry (5 Marks) &

Skills identified (5 Marks)

Select Industries as Per Name of Identification of Skills identified

Your Choice company job profile
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

 PART-3 Comparative analysis among companies (10 Marks)

Points of Company 1 Company 2 Company 3 Company 4 Company 5
Difference

1.

2.

3.

 PART-4 SWOT analysis of self vs organization (5 marks)

SWOT Analysis Self Organisation
Strengths 1. 1.
2. 2.
Weaknesses 1. 1.
2. 2.
Opportunities 1. 1.
2. 2.
Threats 1. 1.
2. 2.

 PART-5 Identification of areas of improvement (5 marks)

Areas of improvement How to improve
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.