Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Series Editors
Toyin Falola
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX, USA
Matthew M. Heaton
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA, USA
This book series serves as a scholarly forum on African contributions to
and negotiations of diverse modernities over time and space, with a par-
ticular emphasis on historical developments. Specifically, it aims to refute
the hegemonic conception of a singular modernity, Western in origin,
spreading out to encompass the globe over the last several decades. Indeed,
rather than reinforcing conceptual boundaries or parameters, the series
instead looks to receive and respond to changing perspectives on an
important but inherently nebulous idea, deliberately creating a space in
which multiple modernities can interact, overlap, and conflict. While privi-
leging works that emphasize historical change over time, the series will
also feature scholarship that blurs the lines between the historical and the
contemporary, recognizing the ways in which our changing understand-
ings of modernity in the present have the capacity to affect the way we
think about African and global histories.
Editorial Board
Akintunde Akinyemi, Literature, University of Florida, Gainesville
Malami Buba, African Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies,
Yongin, South Korea
Emmanuel Mbah, History, CUNY, College of Staten Island
Insa Nolte, History, University of Birmingham
Shadrack Wanjala Nasong’o, International Studies, Rhodes College
Samuel Oloruntoba, Political Science, TMALI, University of South Africa
Bridget Teboh, History, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the
publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to
the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The
publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Foreword
v
vi FOREWORD
reform agenda following the 2017 coup. In the broader literature, Clayton
Thyne and Jonathan Powell’s “Coup d’État or Coup d’Autocracy: How
Coups Impact Democratization, 1950–2008” (2016), Ozan Varol’s The
Democratic Coup d’État (2017), Nikolay Marinov and Hein Goemans’
“Coups and Democracy” (2014) and Paul Collier’s “In Praise of the
Coup” (2009), among others, debate and reach some varying conclusions
about the impact of coups on political processes such as democratisation.
For example, whereas Collier is in praise of the coup for being a means of
liberating an oppressed people from dictatorship, Thyne and Powell warn
that in fact, personal dictatorships and misrule have often been post-coup
outcomes.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni and Ruhanya’s book adds to the aforementioned lit-
erature. Like Thyne and Powell’s work, Ndlovu-Gatsheni and Ruhanya’s
study is not in praise of the coup, and, similar to Thomas-Greenfield and
Wharton, they strike a pessimistic tone with regard to the extent of politi-
cal reform since the 2017 coup. However, two crucial points distinguish
Ndlovu-Gatsheni and Ruhanya’s study from competing works focusing on
Zimbabwe’s post-coup politics. The first is that it surpasses other studies
in terms of scope. Ndlovu-Gatsheni and Ruhanya have assembled an
ambitious book, which examines how post-coup national politics interacts
with, and is shaped by, themes such as nationalism, political economy and
gender. The result is a rich appraisal of politics after the coup that is use-
fully historicised, incorporates political economy and pays notable atten-
tion to gender, which so inscribed politics before and during the coup.
The 2017 coup represents a departure from some of the politics of old
because it was Zimbabwe’s inaugural coup, impacting civil–military rela-
tions for years to come, but a significant part of subsequent politics has
deep historical roots that this book enables the reader to grasp. A second
point that distinguishes Gatsheni and Ruhanya’s book is that it fore-
grounds arguments by young and older Zimbabwean scholars about their
distressed country’s politics.
In recent years, academic interest in coups and military rule has declined
in African Studies, owing to the marked reduction in the frequency of
coups and also because intellectual fashions come and go. Nonetheless,
coups continue to occur and, as the recent case of Zimbabwe shows, their
incidence is not the preserve of countries with a history of successful
coups. The study of coup motivations, dynamics and consequences
FOREWORD vii
This book is founded upon the collective efforts of its editors and con-
tributors. As editors, we appreciate the commitment and cooperation of
all contributors to this project, and therefore take this opportunity to
thank them most sincerely. Sabelo J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni would like to thank
Professor Tshilidzi Marwala (Principal and Vice-Chancellor of the
University of Johannesburg) for facilitating his 2019 Visiting Professorship
at the Johannesburg Institute of Advanced Study (JIAS) and Dr Bongani
Ngqulunga (Director of JIAS) for accepting him as Visiting Professor at
the institute, which enabled completion of this book project. Ndlovu-
Gatsheni also extends thanks to Professor Mandla Makhanya (Principal
and Vice-Chancellor of the University of South Africa), under whom he
works, for giving him time off to work on this book project. The editors
also extend their thanks to Professor Blessing-Miles Tendi (University of
Oxford) and Mr Siphosami Malunga (Executive Director of the Open
Society Initiative for Southern Africa) for contributing foreword and post-
script respectively.
ix
Contents
xi
xii Contents
Postscript: A Tale of Broken Promises389
Siphosami Malunga
Index399
Notes on Contributors
xv
xvi NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS
of the Ferguson Centre for African and Asian Studies at the Open
University; he is also highly rated as a social scientist by the National
Research Foundation of South Africa. He has published over 100
academic works, including seven sole-authored books, and seven
edited volumes. His latest major publications are books entitled
Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization
(2018) and Decolonization, Development and Knowledge in Africa:
Turning Over a New Leaf (2020, forthcoming).
Philip Pasirayi is a Zimbabwean human rights activist and researcher.
He holds a DPhil in International Development from the University of
Oxford (UK). His research interests are in media, democracy, governance
and human rights. He is currently working as Executive Director of a local
Zimbabwean NGO, the Centre for Community Development in
Zimbabwe, based in Harare.
Pedzisai Ruhanya is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow with the University
of Johannesburg’s School of Communication, Faculty of Humanities. He
is the director of the Zimbabwe Democracy Institute (ZDI). He studied
journalism, sociology, human rights and media and democracy at the
Universities of Zimbabwe, Essex (UK) and Westminster (UK).
Toendepi Shonhe is a political economist and Research Fellow at Thabo
Mbeki African Leadership Institute, University of South Africa. He holds
a Master’s in public policy management from the University of
Witwatersrand in South Africa and PhD in Development Studies—
Agrarian Relations from the University of KwaZulu Natal. His research
interest is in agrarian change and economic development. He recently
published a book on reconfigured agrarian relations in Zimbabwe. His
current research work focuses on the agrarian transition in Zimbabwe as
well as land reform, food security and capital accumulation in Africa.
Mkhululi Sibindi is a doctoral student in International Business,
Economics and Trade at the University of South Africa. He completed his
MBA at Zimbabwe Open University. His academic and professional
engagements have included appointments at Richfield Graduate Institute
(South Africa) Trust Academy (Bulawayo). He currently serves as
Senior Lecturer at Richfield Graduate Institute of Technology in
Pretoria. He is a specialist in international capital flows, expansion
strategies and multinational firms’ heterogeneity. His research inter-
ests focus on developing markets, with specific emphasis on Africa. He is
expert in advanced econometrics and quantitative research.
xx NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS
xxi
xxii List of Figures
Fig. 14.1 Demonstrators gathered outside State House after the long
march to and from the Highfields suburb. (Source: Author) 340
Fig. 14.2 A manipulated WhatsApp picture of Grace Mugabe bent
over, General Chiwenga fucking from behind. (Source:
WhatsApp meme) 345
Fig. 14.3 A tweet allegedly from the ZANU–PF handle claiming that
there was no coup, but military action that aimed to help
Mugabe, who had been taken advantage of by his wife 349
Fig. 14.4 Tweet by prominent Zimbabwean musician Mapfumo
suggesting that Grace’s character had triggered Operation
Restore Legacy. (Source: Thomas Mapfumo’s Twitter handle) 350
Fig. 14.5 Trevor Ncube’s tweet, sarcastically commending Grace’s
contribution in the downfall of her husband. (Source: Trevor
Ncube’s Twitter handle) 351
Fig. 14.6 A manipulated WhatsApp image of Robert Mugabe blaming a
miserable-looking Grace for their demise. (Source: WhatsApp
meme)352
Fig. 14.7 A WhatsApp meme that trended on 24 November 2017, on
the inauguration of President Emmerson Mnangagwa.
(Source: WhatsApp meme) 353
List of Tables
xxiii
CHAPTER 1
S. J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni (*)
Archie Mafeje Research Institute, University of South Africa,
Pretoria, South Africa
P. Ruhanya
University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
This is the political terrain within which the Mnangagwa regime has
emerged and finds itself. How do we make broader sense of it? Where
does the potential for people’s freedom lie? In considering these ques-
tions, we have to reflect deeply on the legacy of the liberation struggles
and their implications for freedom. The sociologist Roger Southall, in
Liberation Movements in Power: Party and State in Southern Africa (2013),
posited that the liberation movements of southern Africa moved into gov-
ernment by embodying the hopes of those who supported them both
domestically and internationally, but their performance in governmental
terms was deeply disappointing. Michael Neocosmos’s Thinking Freedom
in Africa: Towards a Theory of Emancipatory Politics (2016) provides the
most extended critique of national liberation politics. The liberation
movements were clear on what they were against (anti-racism, anti-
colonialism and anti-imperialism) and very unclear on what they were for.
Neocosmos (2016) was very critical of the idea of attainment of freedom
under the aegis of the state. This is why he concluded that the politics of
the liberation movements ‘was based on a contradiction that it found
impossible to overcome: the struggle for freedom was a struggle not only
against the colonial state, but to a certain extent against the state itself, like
all struggles for freedom; yet at the same time freedom was said to be
attainable only under the aegis of an independent state, as it had been
frustrated by colonial domination’ (Neocosmos 2016: 130).
Even such luminaries of the liberation movements as Joshua Nkomo,
who led the Zimbabwe African People’s Union and commanded the
Zimbabwe People’s Revolutionary Army, expressed disappointment with
the performance of liberation movements in government. ‘Freedom Lies
Ahead’ is the title of the concluding chapter of Nkomo’s autobiography,
Nkomo: The Story of My Life (1984). In this chapter, Nkomo, who after
death was declared by ZANU-PF as the ‘Father of Zimbabwe’, reflected
deeply on liberation and freedom in Zimbabwe while taking advantage of
a life in exile in the United Kingdom. He posited that ‘The hardest lesson
6 S. J. NDLOVU-GATSHENI AND P. RUHANYA
of my life has come to me late. It is that a nation can win freedom without
its people becoming free’ (Nkomo 1984: 245). Most, if not all, former
colonies gained ‘political independence’ one after another as the ‘physical
empire’, with its direct colonial administration (direct juridical administra-
tion), was universally condemned after the end of the Second World War
in 1945. The key signatures of this political independence became a new
national anthem, a new flag, the faces of black/African leaders in parlia-
ment, the faces of black/African prime ministers or presidents at state
house, the changing of countries’ names (with the exception of South
Africa) to the vernacular and admission of the newly ‘sovereign’ states into
the lowest echelons of the United Nations (Meredith 1984; Ndlovu-
Gatsheni 2012b).
Yes, the elites in charge of the state gained the freedom to accumulate
resources ahead of everyone else, through a process known as bureaucratic
state parasitism. Yes, Nkomo was correct: freedom of the state did not
automatically translate into freedom for the people. What eventually hap-
pened in Zimbabwe under Mugabe is well articulated by Issa G. Shivji
(2003: 15): ‘National question turns into state-building. Nation-building
is substituted by party and party by leader, the founder of the nation.’
Mugabe and his wife (Grace Mugabe), as the first family, ended up being
the centre of national politics. This is a bane of, if not the underside of, the
decolonisation of the twentieth century.
Neo-colonialism exacerbated the lack of freedom for both the state and
the people in Africa, and on another level, it gave some African leaders an
excuse to blame external factors for their failure to deliver freedom. This
was articulated by Kwame Nkrumah in Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of
Imperialism (1965):
Like the Mugabe regime, the Mnangagwa regime is using the discourse
of sanctions to justify all its limitations. Indeed, sanctions must be removed
because they always hurt the poor and they also give failing regimes a con-
venient excuse to blame external factors. It would seem Nkomo again had
a different take: he strongly believed that African leaders were duty bound
to deliver freedom to the people even within the constraining environ-
ment of neo-colonialism and neo-imperialism. Nkomo rejected easy
excuses for the non-delivery of freedom and services to the people. He
suggested that ‘African leaders must improve their record of human rights,
and African peoples too must have greater regard to their responsibilities’
(Nkomo 1984: 247). Nkomo (1984: 252) concluded his autobiography
with a positive note: ‘It is not too late to change all that, to muster the
collective energy of our people and build the new Zimbabwe we promised
through all those long years of suffering and struggle.’
Perhaps Nkomo was able to reflect on liberation and freedom in
Zimbabwe in these terms because he was not in power! But his medita-
tions indicated the strong potential for reconstituting the political and
transcending the scourge of Mugabeism. Mugabeism itself failed to rise
above intolerant and repressive political cultures of Rhodesian settler colo-
nialism. Instead of breaking with colonial settler traditions of brutality and
repressive political practices, Mugabeism innovated and ‘improved’ on the
Rhodesian settler colonial Leviathan, adding the logic of governance by
military operations, with devastating implications for democracy, human
rights and people’s freedoms (see Rupiya 2005). To racism and patriarchy,
Mugabe added tribalism. What emerged was a complex ‘securocratic state’
with a party, military and parasitic business complex at its helm (a
Chimurenga aristocracy in power) (see Shumba 2018). The ‘right of con-
quest’ that was used by Rhodesian settler colonialists was succeeded by
8 S. J. NDLOVU-GATSHENI AND P. RUHANYA
I will go nowhere. I will fight tooth and nail against those making mockery
against ZANU-PF founding principles. You and your cohorts will instead
leave ZANU-PF by the will of the people and this we will do in the coming
weeks. (Mnangagwa 2017)
1 INTRODUCTION: TRANSITION IN ZIMBABWE… 9
1
The Lacoste faction supported Emerson Mnangagwa. It wanted Mugabe to be succeeded
by Mnangagwa who was one of the two deputy presidents of Zimbabwe. It was not clear who
the G40 supported as successor to Mugabe. It was composed of what could be termed the
‘Young Turks’ within ZANU-PF. These were a younger generation of politicians without
liberation credentials. But they had managed to form a close circle around Mugabe and
Grace Mugabe. Its most vociferous member was Professor Jonathan Moyo who was opposed
to Mnangagwa succeeding Mugabe. Grace Mugabe openly sided with the G40. Immediately
before the military coup of November 2017, Professor Moyo openly put forward the name
of Sydney Sekeramayi as the senior ZANU-PF politician to succeed Mugabe. But Sekeramayi
never rose to the occasion.
10 S. J. NDLOVU-GATSHENI AND P. RUHANYA
under the radical land reform programme. The third was to return
Zimbabwe to the ambit of international community (re-engagement).
The fourth was to be a president of all Zimbabweans (nation-building and
national healing). The fifth was to deal decisively with corruption (see
Raftopolous 2019).
The main hurdle for Mnangagwa was to gain full legitimacy as the state
president of Zimbabwe. This meant he had to call for national elections.
His advantage was that the opposition was in disarray, rocked by factional-
ism following the death of Morgan Tsvangirai on 14 February 2018. The
key disadvantage was that ZANU–PF was also in disarray. But Mnangagwa
had no option but to organise elections if he was to ‘move beyond the
shadow of the coup and seek a new legitimacy through an election that was
perceived to be peaceful and credible’ (Raftopolous 2019: 18). The elec-
tions were held in July 2018, with Mnangagwa facing the youthful Nelson
Chamisa of the MDC Alliance in the presidential contest. Mnangagwa
emerged the winner with 50.6 per cent, while Chamisa had 44.3 per cent.
While the campaign period was very peaceful, on 1 August 2018, the mili-
tary shot and killed six protesters in Harare who were protesting over the
delayed announcement of presidential results. Secondly, Chamisa and his
party disputed the results of the presidential elections and built a case that
was heard at the Constitutional Court. The court upheld Mnangagwa as
the winner, but Chamisa’s challenge raised the long-standing question of
political legitimacy that has been haunting Zimbabwe since 2000.
But what really dented the image of the Mnangagwa regime, which was
desperate for international engagement, was the killing of civilians by the
army in Harare. This meant that the ‘second republic’ was born with what
could be termed a very bad birthmark. What made matters even more
complicated was that it was not clear who deployed and ordered the mili-
tary to intervene in civilian political protest. Was the ‘second republic’ a
military junta, where political disputes would always be resolved through
violent military intervention? Mnangagwa was forced to institute a
Commission of Inquiry into the disturbances of 1 August in order to deal
with the regime’s image, but like all government instituted commissions
its outcomes were disappointing, and its value was not clear. It was purely
and simply a public relations exercise.
As the Mugabe regime was, Mnangagwa’s regime is besieged by numer-
ous challenges. The pledge to put Zimbabwe on an economic recovery
and growth path predicated on a neo-liberal framework has provoked
social turmoil, which manifested itself in a second round of public protest
in 2019. Once again, the army had to intervene with its usual violence
12 S. J. NDLOVU-GATSHENI AND P. RUHANYA
media. Deploying the notion of political culture, the chapter examines the
state of civil society and its role in Zimbabwe’s transition to democracy. It
views the media as part of civil society, sketching its development and cur-
rent state as a stakeholder in democratic transition. At the centre of the
discussion are the practices and political values that have arguably contrib-
uted to a narrowing democratic culture over the years. It boldly argues
that this can be located in the centralist tendencies of the state, the limited
involvement of diverse civil society groups, a restrictive media environ-
ment and the conflation between state and party politics.
Part 2 opens with Bekezela Gumbo’s interrogation of the role of iden-
tity politics in Zimbabwe’s transitional politics. Chapter 6 offers a concep-
tual construction of the three group identifiers upon which identity politics
has manifested as a dominant political culture, positing that the past and
future of transition lie in its nature and extent and how it is harnessed and
utilised in the transition process. Gumbo maps out three basic clusters that
seem to vary as national transition questions bedevil the nation from time
to time. These three overriding ‘group-coalescing’ and/or ‘group identi-
fier’ strands are racist nationalism, the politics of tribal/ethnic hegemony
and the politics of liberation entitlement. It is Gumbo’s thesis that these
three group identifiers have nurtured and prolonged the existing political
culture in Zimbabwe, which has in turn shaped political transition in the
country.
Chapter 7 is by Samukele Hadebe, who posits that the ethnicisation of
politics in Zimbabwe has reached levels that both academics and policy-
makers continue to ignore—at great peril to the stability and even territo-
rial integrity of the country. Hadebe gives a historical context of ethnic
rivalry and conflict in Zimbabwe, with a particular emphasis on the ethni-
cisation of liberation movement narratives in the first instance, and also
delves deeply into perception of the pro-Mthwakazi movements. The
author is of the view that it is useful to try and understand how these
groups perceive issues, as their perceptions have a material basis. Like
Gumbo, Hadebe is concerned with exploring political mobilisation on
ethnic and regional grounds, and the possible implications for Ndebele-
speaking communities in particular and Zimbabwean politics in general.
Part 2 closes with Pedzisai Ruhanya’s examination of the challenges
brought about by the militarisation of state institutions. Militarism has
become a political culture in Zimbabwe in the same way as politicised
ethnicity. Chapter 8 posits that the overthrow of President Robert Mugabe
cannot be explained adequately by the combined military intervention
1 INTRODUCTION: TRANSITION IN ZIMBABWE… 15
and public protests in November 2017. The story is more complex than
this, and requires careful analysis of the distinct and organised militarisa-
tion of key state institutions from 2002 to 2017 that facilitated Mugabe’s
fall. Ruhanya deploys the competitive authoritarian analytic lens to under-
stand events, while at the same time critiquing it for not enabling him to
fully address the distinct role of the military and its liberation connection
to the ruling elites. Ironically, the politicisation of the military that served
Mugabe well from 1980 until November 2017 was the same infrastruc-
ture that devoured him. He unwittingly constructed a de facto military
state led by a de jure civilian authority under his authoritarian tutelage.
The chapter shows that when military interests were threatened by Mugabe
and his wife, the security apparatus played its hand to block the rise of
dynastic and familial politics. Four zones in which power was contested
were calculatedly infiltrated by the military, thereby capturing both party
and state over the long term. The roles of the media, judiciary, electors
and legislature are examined.
Part 3 opens with Philip Pasirayi’s analysis of the intersections of media
and politics during the ‘Third Chimurenga’ in Zimbabwe. This issue was
introduced in Part I by Stanley Tsarwe—who explored the entanglement
of media, society and political culture. Chapter 9 specifically explores the
hidden strategies of media control that were deployed by ZANU–PF dur-
ing the violent seizure of white-owned farms in Zimbabwe from 2000.
The media was central in the ruling party’s efforts to justify this controver-
sial exercise. In the state media, this land redistribution was justified as the
‘Third Chimurenga’, meaning the third and final phase of the war against
colonial rule in which land was a central grievance. The chapter explores
how Professor Jonathan Moyo, the newly appointed Minister of State for
Information and Publicity, managed to manipulate journalists from the
state press through meetings, money, threats to jobs, and the creation and
dissemination of content via routine briefings, which resulted in a commit-
ted, self-policing journalistic team and a pliant state press. At the centre of
the chapter are the media briefings that were held by Moyo with journal-
ists and editors from the state press, which were a kind of political re-
education that explained what constituted the ‘national interest’ and how
this was supposed to be framed in the state media. Moyo established a
hard-working and hands-on style of management, and considered history
and culture to be an important part of the media. The chapter gives an
insight into the inner workings of the ZANU–PF media machine, showing
how it was carefully designed both institutionally and ideologically to
16 S. J. NDLOVU-GATSHENI AND P. RUHANYA
achieve set objectives from the perspective of hybrid regimes, and the
means and mechanisms of media control in these contexts.
Chapter 10 by Shepherd Mpofu and Trust Matsilele looks at social
media and the concept of dissidence in Zimbabwean politics. Their depar-
ture point is that most media studies in Zimbabwe since 2000 have tended
to focus on questions about politics and the economy, with much empha-
sis on how the media, both private and public, mediated state–opposition–
civil society relations. The focus has seen a dramatic shift following the
Arab Spring uprisings, from 2010 onwards, which saw social media being
credited for the toppling of most of the North African strongmen. Mpofu
and Matsilele posit that these reports failed to appreciate the human and
social relations constituted by the social media. Their argument pivots on
the relations between online and offline worlds, and the chapter demon-
strates how relations since 2000 have been mischaracterised because of a
failure to appreciate the anthropological view of state–opposition–civil
society relations. The authors note that social media comments were not
protests, juvenile insults as some scholars have argued, but rather dissi-
dence. This dissidence, they argue, has a history and is part of Zimbabwean
cultural expression that has simply morphed into social media as forms of
mediation and dariro (playground) have changed over time. Social media,
the authors say, is the same as other cultural gatherings where dissidence
has been allowed in Zimbabwean society. While focusing on the period
post-2013, they draw strong connections with earlier periods to demon-
strate the long-running thread of dissidence.
Part 3 closes with Wellington Gadzikwa’s exploration of the ‘tabloidisa-
tion’ of political news in Zimbabwe and the question of press quality.
Chapter 10 posits that the media is indispensable to the functioning of a
democracy as it is the pre-eminent vehicle for public debates in the mod-
ern public sphere(s). The conduct of the press and the ethical virtues it
projects are directly linked to its ability to enhance democracy. In
Zimbabwe, after more than two decades of political turmoil and unprec-
edented economic decline, journalistic standards have plummeted for vari-
ous reasons. The author argues that this decline in standards has taken
place owing to a process of tabloidisation of the mainstream broadsheet
newspapers. This tabloidised media negates the natural function of the
media in terms of democracy through diversion, trivialisation and sensa-
tionalisation of important issues. The core argument of this chapter is
predicated on a qualitative content analysis of and in-depth interviews
about the media coverage of the expulsion of Joice Mujuru from
1 INTRODUCTION: TRANSITION IN ZIMBABWE… 17
regime on his promises to reform the political, economic and social fabric
of the country, including government, which is characterised by corrup-
tion, among other forms of abuse of public power. At an international
level, President Mnangagwa has initiated efforts to end Zimbabwe’s isola-
tion from the international family of nations. For Chigwata and
Marumahoko, the key question is whether the idea of a new Zimbabwe is
possible. If so, under what conditions can Zimbabwe be reborn again?
Their chapter posits that the fall of Mugabe is only the first step towards
building a new Zimbabwe, and argues that the overriding task is to dis-
mantle the Mugabe system of governance that epitomises not only the
public sector but also non-state sectors. With the right kind of leadership,
Zimbabwe has the potential to set the development and democratic pace
on the African continent.
Chapter 14 is by Lyton Ncube. It focuses on how Zimbabwe’s
Operation Restore Legacy reflected misogyny, sexism and hyper-
masculinity. Ncube posits that Zimbabwean political culture is punctuated
by (hetero)gendered traditions and tendencies, and as such pivots on the
construction of hegemonic masculinity. This reproduces and reinforces
male-gendered domination, gender exclusion, sexism and misogyny.
Theoretically, the chapter is guided by Raewyn Connell’s hegemonic mas-
culinity concept. Hegemonic masculinity refers to ‘the configuration of
gender practice which embodies the currently accepted answer to the
problem of legitimacy of patriarchy, which guarantees (or is taken to guar-
antee) the dominant position of men and the subordination of women’
(Connell 2005: 77). The chapter therefore explores gendered and sexist
discourses that manifested and played out both in the streets and digital
spaces during Operation Restore Legacy. Empirically, it reflects on the
political fates of female political figures such as Joice Mujuru and
Grace Mugabe.
Chapter 15 by Mkhululi Sibindi draws the book to a conclusion. It
deals with the Mnangagwa regime’s drive to bring Zimbabwe back to the
ambit of the international community. This re-engagement question is
examined from the specific vantage point of the endeavours made to
attract FDI in the post-Mugabe era. Sibindi argues that given the nature
of Zimbabwe’s economic and political scenarios there is no doubt that the
political competence of the new Zimbabwe government will be measured
on how a failed economy can be returned to productivity. In this context,
the new government has made an effort to reach international communi-
ties in search of FDI. What Sibindi examines is the compatibility of
1 INTRODUCTION: TRANSITION IN ZIMBABWE… 19
Going Forward
A regime born of a military coup, even if it attempts to ‘civilianise’ itself
through appointing an unelected civilian figure as president and organis-
ing elections (post facto) to cover its illegitimate footprints, remains a
progeny of violence. The civilianisation process has seen key military fig-
ures, including the Commander of the Zimbabwe National Army, chang-
ing military fatigues for civilian designer suits to assume political and
government positions. The implication of all this is the direct and open
invasion of the political by the military. Thus, despite the elections of
2018, Zimbabwean politics has remained volatile and characterised by
intrigues, plots and counter-plots within the ruling party. The political
culture has become even more complex and violent.
A number of writers in this volume therefore wrestle with the funda-
mental question of the political culture of Zimbabwe and its sub-questions
of identity, militarism, patriarchy, masculinity, sexism and disdain for
democracy and human rights. These were the hallmarks of Mugabeism.
What is emerging clearly is that the Mnangagwa regime is a product of this
political culture, and because of this genealogical affinity it is very difficult
for the so-called Second Republic to make a clear break with Mugabeism.
The very act by Mnangagwa of moving the old politicians who were
Mugabe’s lieutenants for over thirty-seven years into the headquarters of
ZANU–PF to continue with the administrative aspects of the party, and to
plot its future political strategy, indicates beyond reasonable doubt that
genuine democratic reforms are not on the horizon for the
Mnangagwa regime.
Worse still, it is under the Mnangagwa regime that the military has
formally and overtly asserted its authority in the party and government.
On an economic level, the regime’s acceptance of a crude neo-liberal
framework reminiscent of the notorious Structural Adjustment
Programmes of the 1980s and 1990s reveals desperation, and surrender to
20 S. J. NDLOVU-GATSHENI AND P. RUHANYA
the mantra of market forces as the silver bullet for economic recovery and
economic growth. On a political level, the way the Mnangagwa govern-
ment has handled political and social protest has amounted to scoring an
own goal. Using the military to deal with civil disputes at a time when the
country’s citizens and the wider world have questions about the nature of
the Mnangagwa regime—particularly whether it is a military junta mas-
querading as a civilian government—is a sign of folly, if not a failure to
cover up the influence of the military on governance issues. Having come
to power at a time when previous ways of thinking about progressive gov-
ernance (ranging from Marxism and Third World nationalism to neo-
liberal visions) have become obsolete, the Mnangagwa regime is bound to
fall into repetition on all fronts. It is indeed not clear whether we are see-
ing old wine in new goatskins or new goatskins containing old wine.
References
Aeby, M. 2015. Zimbabwe’s Gruelling Transition: Interim Power-Sharing and
Conflict Management in Southern Africa. Unpublished PhD thesis,
University of Basel.
Alexander, J. 2006. The Unsettled Land: State-Making and the Politics of Land in
Zimbabwe 1893–2003. Oxford: James Currey.
Campbell, H. 2003. Reclaiming Zimbabwe: The Exhaustion of Patriarchal Model of
Liberation. Trenton: Africa World Press.
Chiwenga, C. 2017. Press Statement: In Defence of the Nation’s Founding Values,
Gains of Independence. The Herald, November 15, 2017.
Connell, R. 2005. Globalization, Imperialism, and Masculinities. In Handbook of
Studies on Men and Masculinities, eds. M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, and R. Connell,
71–89. Thoudsand Oaks: Sage.
Hammar, A., and B. Raftopolous. 2003. Zimbabwe’s Unfinished Business:
Rethinking Land, State and Nation. In Zimbabwe’s Unfinished Business:
Rethinking Land, State, and Nation in the Context of Crisis, ed. A. Hammar,
B. Raftopolous, and S. Jensen, 1–41. Harare: Weaver Press.
Hammar, A., B. Raftopolous, and S. Jensen, eds. 2003. Zimbabwe’s Unfinished
Business: Rethinking Land, State and Nation in the Context of Crisis. Harare:
Weaver Press.
International Crisis Group. 2017. Zimbabwe’s ‘Military-assisted Transition’ and
the Prospects for Recovery. Africa Briefing, 134.
Kriger, N. 2003. Guerrilla Veterans in Post-War Zimbabwe: Symbolic and Violent
Politics, 1980–1987. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meredith, M. 1984. The First Dance of Freedom: Black Africa in the Post-War Era.
London: Hamish Hamilton Ltd.
1 INTRODUCTION: TRANSITION IN ZIMBABWE… 21
Rudo Gaidzanwa
Introduction
Pye and Verba (1965) defined political culture as the totality of basic val-
ues, feelings and knowledge that underlie the political process in a specific
country or environment. The manner in which citizens interact with and
experience governance institutions shapes their participation in civic and
political affairs. Thus the beliefs, opinions, emotions and experiences of
citizens, residents and members of communities are shaped by the behav-
iours of governance institutions at all levels. When governance structures
are remote and inaccessible, citizens may become alienated from them,
resulting in disconnection between the governed and the governors. In
some instances, governance structures and personnel may be authoritar-
ian, coercive and intolerant of dissent, also resulting in the alienation of
citizens from their governments. Such governance systems generate dis-
sent, protest and opposition, resulting in their destabilization, as well as
that of the structures and societies concerned. Ideally, citizens desire the
freedom to engage with those who preside over their governance systems
R. Gaidzanwa (*)
Department of Sociology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
The archaeocytes are rounded amoeboid cells early set apart in the
larva; they are practically undifferentiated blastomeres. Some of
them become reproductive elements, and thus afford a good
instance of "continuity of germ plasm," others probably perform
excretory functions.[198]
The larva has unfortunately not been described, but as the course of
development among the near relatives of H. panicea is known to be
fairly constant, it will be convenient to give a description of a
"Halichondrine type" of larva based on Maas' account of the
development of Gellius varius.[199] The free-swimming larvae escape
by the osculum; they are minute oval bodies moving rapidly by
means of a covering of cilia. The greater part of the body is a
dazzling white, while the hinder pole is of a brown violet colour. This
coloured patch is non-ciliate, the general covering of cilia ending at
its edge in a ring of cilia twice the length of the others. Forward
movement takes place in a screw line; when this ceases the larva
rests on its hinder pole, and the cilia cause it to turn round on its
axis.
Fig. 68.—Longitudinal section through the hinder pole of the larva of G. varius. a,
Flagellated cells; ma1, undifferentiated cell; ma2, differentiated cell; pi,
pigment; x, surface of hinder pole. (After Maas.)
The cells in the inner mass are classified into (1) undifferentiated
cells, recognised by their nucleus, which possesses a nucleolus;
these are the archaeocytes; (2) differentiated cells, of which the
nucleus contains a chromatin net; these give rise to pinacocytes,
collencytes, and scleroblasts. Some of them form a flat epithelium,
which covers the hinder pole. Some of the scleroblasts already
contain spicules. Fixation occurs very early. The front pole is used
for attachment, the pigmented pole becoming the distal end (Fig.
69). The larva flattens out, the margin of the attached end is
produced into radiating pseudopodial processes. The flagellated
cells retreat to the interior, leaving the inner mass exposed, and
some of its cells thereupon form a flat outer epithelium. This is the
most important process of the metamorphosis; it is followed by a
pause in the outward changes, coinciding in time with
rearrangements of the internal cells to give rise to the canal system;
that is to say, lacunae arise in the inner mass, pinacocytes pass to
the surface of the lacunae, and form their lining; the flagellated cells,
which have lain in confusion, become grouped in small clusters.
These become flagellated chambers, communications are
established between the various portions of the canal system, and its
external apertures arise. There is at first only one osculum. The
larvae may be obtained by keeping the parent sponge in a dish of
sea water, shielded from too bright a light, and surrounded by a
second dish of water to keep the temperature constant. They will
undergo metamorphosis in sea water which is constantly changed,
and will live for some days.
We have said that the young sponge has only one osculum. This is
the only organ which is present in unit number, and it is natural to
ask whether perhaps the osculum may not be taken as a mark of the
individual; whether the fistular specimens, for example, of H. panicea
may not be solitary individuals, and the cockscomb and other forms
colonies in which the individuals are merged to different degrees.
Into the metaphysics of such a view we cannot enter here. We must
be content to refer to the views of Huxley and of Spencer on
Individuality.
Ephydatia fluviatilis.
In the fresh water of our rivers, ponds, and lakes, sponges are
represented very commonly by Ephydatia (Spongilla) fluviatilis, a
cosmopolitan species. The search for specimens is most likely to be
successful if perpendicular timbers such as lock-gates are examined,
or the underside of floating logs or barges, or overhanging branches
of trees which dip beneath the surface of the water.
CHAPTER VIII
Sponges fall naturally into two branches differing in the size of their
choanocytes: in the Megamastictora these cells are relatively
large, varying from 5µ to 9µ in diameter; in Micromastictora they
are about 3µ in diameter.[212] For further subdivision of the group the
spicules are such important weapons in the hands of the
systematist that it is convenient to name them according to a
common scheme. This has been arrived at by considering first the
number of axes along which the main branches of the spicules are
distributed, and secondly whether growth has occurred in each of
these axes in one or both directions from a point of origin.[213]
BRANCH I. MEGAMASTICTORA
CLASS CALCAREA
Calcarea are marine shallow-water forms attached for the most part
directly by the basal part of the body or occasionally by the
intervention of a stalk formed of dermal tissue. They are almost all
white or pale grey brown in colour. Their spicules are either monaxon
or tetraxon or both. The tetraxons are either quadriradiate and then
called "calthrops," or triradiate when the fourth actine is absent. The
triradiates always lie more or less tangentially in the body-wall;
similarly three rays of a calthrop are tangentially placed, the fourth
lying across the thickness of the wall. It is convenient to include the
triradiate and the three tangentially placed rays of a calthrop under
the common term "triradiate system" (Minchin). The three rays of
one of these systems may all be equal in length and meet at equal
angles: in this case the system is "regular." Or one ray or one angle
may differ in size from the other rays or angles respectively, which
are equal: in either of these two cases the system is bilaterally
symmetrical and is termed "sagittal." A special name "alate" is given
to those systems which are sagittal in consequence of the inequality
in the angles. Thus all equiangular systems whether sagittal or not
are opposed to those which are alate. This is the natural
classification.[214]
Sub-Class I. Homocoela.
The Homocoela or Ascons possess the simplest known type of canal
system, and by this they are defined. The body is a sac, branched in
the adult, but simple in the young; its continuous cavity is
everywhere lined with choanocytes, its wall is traversed by inhalant
pores, and its cavity opens to the exterior at the distal end by an
osculum. The simple sac-like young is the well-known Olynthus of
Haeckel—the starting-point from which all sponges seem to have set
out. Two processes are involved in the passage from the young to
the adult, namely, multiplication of oscula and branching of the
original Olynthus tube or sac. If the formation of a new osculum is
accompanied by fission of the sac, and the branching of the latter is
slight, there arises an adult formed of a number of erect, well
separated main tubes, each with one osculum and lateral branches.
Such is the case in the Leucosoleniidae. In the Clathrinidae, on
the other hand, branching of the Olynthus is complicated, giving rise
to what is termed reticulate body form, that is, a sponge body
consisting of a network of tubules with several oscula, but with no
external indication of the limits between the portions drained by each
osculum. These outward characters form a safe basis for
classification, because they are correlated with other fundamental
differences in structure and development.[215]
Fig. 80.—Sycon setosum. Young Sponge. × 200. d, Dermal cell; g, gastral cell; o,
osculum; p, pore cell; sp1, monaxon; sp3, triradiate spicule. (After Maas.)
The walls of the paragaster are known as the "gastral cortex"; they
contain quadriradiate spicules, of which the triradiate systems lie
tangentially in the gastral cortex, while the apical ray projects into the
paragaster, and is no doubt defensive. The distal ends of the
chambers bristle with tufts of oxeate spicules, and the separate
chambers are distinguishable in surface view. It is interesting to
notice that in some species of Sycon, the gaps between the distal
ends of the chambers are covered over by a delicate perforated
membrane, thus leading on, as we shall see presently, to the next
stage of advance.[219] The larva of Sycon is an amphiblastula (see
p. 227). Fig. 80 is a drawing of the young sponge soon after fixation;
it would pass equally well for an ideally simple Ascon or, neglecting
the arrangement of the spicules, for an isolated radial tube of Sycon.
Figs. 81, 82 show the same sponge, somewhat older. From them it is
seen that the Sycon type is produced from the young individual, in
what may be called its Ascon stage, by a process of outgrowth of
tubes from its walls, followed by restriction of choanocytes to the
flagellated chambers. Minute observation has shown[220] that this
latter event is brought about by immigration of pinacocytes from the
exterior. These cells creep through the jelly of the dermal layer and