Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Series Editor
Kent Deng, London School of Economics, London, UK
Palgrave Studies in Economic History is designed to illuminate and enrich
our understanding of economies and economic phenomena of the past.
The series covers a vast range of topics including financial history, labour
history, development economics, commercialisation, urbanisation, indus-
trialisation, modernisation, globalisation, and changes in world economic
orders.
Charles Read
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2023
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such
names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for
general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa-
tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither
the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with
respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been
made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Frontispiece: The Overstone Cycle of Trade from The Money Bag, 1858 vol.,
between p. 112 and p. 113, fold out. The cartoon gives the Banking School’s
point of view and is actually a criticism of the Currency School (Princeton
University Library)
Acknowledgements
The research presented in this book would not have been possible without
the help of a large number of individuals and institutions, to whom I am
extremely grateful. First of all, I would like to thank the British Academy
for the award of a post-doctoral fellowship (PF2\180089), which funded
the research in this book as part of a larger project entitled ‘The causes
and consequences of financial crises in the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland, c.1801–1922’. Their support of my academic career
through its post-Ph.D. stage has been invaluable.
My introduction to the crises of 1847 occurred during my doctoral
research completed at the University of Cambridge for a thesis entitled
‘British Economic Policy and Ireland, c.1841–1853’ (2016). I would
like to thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council of the United
Kingdom for funding my doctoral work and to Eugenio Biagini and
Martin Daunton for supervising it. The thesis reassessed the short-term
causes and consequences of the financial crises in the City of London in
1847 and the impact they had on Ireland during its Great Famine, which
was little understood in the academic literature up to that point. It was
as I was finishing off my Ph.D. project that I realised the insights I drew
about the crises of 1847 could also be applied more widely over the past
200 years of British financial history, sparking the genesis of this project.
I would like to acknowledge those institutions that have hosted my
post-doctoral research and that allowed me to develop my ideas about
the causes of financial crises in the United Kingdom. In particular, I
vii
viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
would like to thank Roy Foster and the Principal and Fellows of Hertford
College, Oxford, for electing me to the Irish Government Senior Schol-
arship there; the Master and Fellows of Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge,
for electing me for a year as a bye-fellow; and the Master and Fellows of
Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, for electing me to a fellowship and
college lectureship in history. I wrote and redrafted substantial sections of
this book living in Corpus during the lockdowns resulting from the covid-
19 pandemic and I would like to thank those colleagues who kept my
spirits up during that period, in person or online, particularly: Christopher
Andrew, Marina Frasca-Spada, Andrew Harvey, John Hatcher, Philippa
Hoskin, Shruti Kapila, Christopher Kelly, Peter Martland, Amar Sohal,
Emma Spary, Michael Sutherland and Samuel Zeitlin. I would also like
to thank my early-career comrades-in-arms for their moral support during
the research and writing phases of this book, including but not limited to:
Robin Adams, Eriko Padron-Regalado, Brian Varian and Lewis Willcocks.
I would like to thank all those who have helped with the research,
writing and publication of this book, too numerous in number to mention
all by name. Nevertheless, I would especially like to thank Kent Deng
and my editors at Palgrave for including this volume in the Palgrave
Studies in Economic History series. I would also like to thank those who
attended papers I gave based on earlier versions of this research for their
generous and useful feedback at the ‘State, economy and society’ confer-
ence at Churchill College, Cambridge in 2016, the Oxford Irish History
Seminar at Hertford College, a workshop on the Bubble Act hosted
by D’Maris Coffman and Helen Paul, and several Economic History
Society annual conferences. My immense appreciation goes to Eugenio
and Martin for reading many draft sections of this project over the past
few years and to Rui Esteves, Aaron Graham, Sara Horrell, Harold James,
Doug Kanter, Eoin McLaughlin, Duncan Needham, Kevin O’Rourke,
Robin Pearson, George Peden, William Quinn, Sabine Schneider, Peter
Solar and Solomos Solomou for useful support, feedback and research
leads at critical moments in this project’s gestation. All remaining errors
nonetheless remain my own.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix
Finally, but most of all, I would like to thank my parents, Simon and
Karin Read, for all their love and support, and without whom this project
would never have seen the light of day. This book is dedicated to them.
Corpus Christi College, Cambridge
1 Introduction 1
1.1 The Carry Trade and the Banking School 3
1.2 A British Bank Is Run with Precision? 5
1.3 Current Research in Economic History 9
1.4 The Monetary Thought of the Non-conformist
Conscience 11
1.5 Re-introducing the Banking School 13
2 Peel’s Economic-Policy Regime Change in Britain
During the Early Nineteenth Century 21
2.1 Peel’s Policies 23
2.2 Opening up Trade 25
2.3 Currency 35
2.4 Interest Rates 42
2.5 Conclusion 46
3 The Ideas and Policies of the Banking School 55
3.1 The Banking School as a Reaction Against Peel’s
Policies 56
3.2 The Banking School and Interest Rates 61
3.3 Testing the Banking School’s Theories with Charts 66
3.4 Testing the Banking School’s Theories
with Econometrics 77
3.5 Summary of Conclusions 85
xi
xii CONTENTS
xv
List of Figures
Fig. 2.1 Duty payable per quarter for foreign imports of wheat
according to price in shillings/quarter 1828–1869 33
Fig. 2.2 Cost of interest on national debt and government
expenditure 1797–1830 (£m) 43
Fig. 3.1 The Overstone Cycle of trade from The Money Bag, 1858
vol., between p. 112 and p. 113, fold out (Princeton
University Library) 64
Fig. 3.2 UK long-term interest rate (consol yield) and years
with real GDP per person lower than the previous year 68
Fig. 3.3 Long-term interest rates for the United Kingdom
and United States, 1810–1899 69
Fig. 3.4 A comparison of US and UK short-term free market
interest rates 1836–1899. At the top, shown as a dotted
line, is the ratio ([US rate] – [UK rate])/US + UK rates.
Where this ratio falls between 0.1 and −0.1, the period
is shown by the grey shaded bars 70
Fig. 3.5 A comparison of US and UK short-term free market
interest rates 1825–1899 and long-term UK interest rates 72
Fig. 3.6 The note and coin reserve to total deposits ratio, weekly
data 73
Fig. 3.7 The bullion reserve to total liabilities ratio, weekly data 74
Fig. 3.8 The Bank of England Note Reserve and Total Coin
and Bullion, weekly data 75
Fig. 3.9 Percentage decrease in nominal English GDP per head
over next 4 years by year (%) 76
xvii
xviii LIST OF FIGURES
Table 2.1 Loss of value of Bank of England notes against gold coin 38
Table 3.1 Results of OLS test with Bullion Reserve as dependent
variable 78
Table 3.2 Results of OLS test with Bank Rate as dependent
variable 79
Table 3.3 Results of Granger Causality test: Bank Rate and Bullion
Reserve 79
Table 3.4 Results of Granger Causality test: Bank Rate and free
market rate 80
Table 3.5 Crises months denoted by ‘1’ in the Probit model 81
Table 3.6 Results of OLS test with first difference of ‘Bullion
Exports from UK to the US minus Imports from US’
as the dependent variable 83
Table 3.7 Results of OLS test with ‘Bullion Exports from UK
to the US minus imports from US’ as the dependent
variable 83
Table 3.8 Results of Granger Causality test between interest-rate
difference and bullion flows and interest-rate difference
and exchange rate (all first differenced) 83
Table 3.9 Results of an OLS test with log ‘Total capital flows
in and out of UK’ as the dependent variable 84
Table 3.10 Results of an augmented Engle-Granger test with log
‘Total capital flows in and out of UK’ as the dependent
variable (m = million) 85
xxi
xxii LIST OF TABLES
Introduction
But this long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run
we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in
tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the
ocean is flat again.
—J. M. Keynes, ‘A Tract on Monetary Reform’ in Collected Writings of
John Maynard Keynes, IV (Cambridge: CUP, 2013) p. 65.1
crises between 1825 and 1866, then, outside the world wars, no major
systemically important ones until 1973, before two massive ones in 1973–
1975 and 2007–2009.
If crises are to be mitigated by ‘Calming the Storms’ in the future
as successfully as the Banking School did at the end of the nineteenth
century, the short-term processes that cause crises have to be understood.
When Keynes quipped ‘in the long run we are all dead’, he was pointing
out that the consideration of economic systems in the long term alone
made it too easy to set aside the awkward and inconvenient factors that
had produced short-run periods of instability and disruption over the
previous century.
had changed in reality) for the fact that the crisis was for the most part
not anticipated.14 However, whereas many economists and policymakers
have been caught by surprise by the return of severe banking crises in
Britain, the global financial crisis would have looked rather familiar to
many of their Victorian forebears.
Since the global financial crisis, scholars and policymakers, in Britain
as well as around the world, have been looking to the past in order to
find lessons to prevent crises in the future. As severe financial crises in the
United Kingdom disappeared after 1866 for more than a century, can the
same lessons learnt be applied again in the post-financial crash era in the
early twenty-first century? What did the Banking School have to say about
their experience of banking instability in Victorian Britain?
The focus of recent studies has been substantially microeconomic in
nature. In many of these studies the root causes of financial crises have
been identified as asset-price boom and busts caused by investor mania
and irrationality that still needs to be controlled by regulation of bankers’
activities. Their focus, therefore, has been substantially on microeconomic
issues such as the incentive structures for bankers, corporate gover-
nance and the design of banking regulation rather than the effect of
governments and central bankers in creating an unstable macroeconomic
environment for the financial sector.
In 2014 John Turner wrote about how what he saw as a relatively
stable banking system between the 1860s and the late twentieth century
was due to an appropriate passing of risk to shareholders, which was
frustrated in modern times by the withering away of the remaining
liability that bank shareholders still possessed in Victorian times.15 In
2015 Adair Turner, a regulator and a chairman of Britain’s Financial
Services Authority after the global financial crisis, drew attention to a
number of interventionist proposals to manage the growth and allocation
of credit creation: to diluting tax credit as a form of economic pollution,
to boosting the capital of banks, and to the control of lending on real
estate.16 Nicholas Dimsdale and Anthony Hotson’s useful collection of
essays on crises in Britain suggests that the dismantling of credit controls
which started during the 1970s is at the root of the problem with the
inference that this was a reflection of railway mania in the 1840s.17
Ranald Michie’s interesting study of the City of London over the
period of the rise and fall of banking instability in Britain suggests
that changing cultural attitudes towards the attractiveness of maturity
transformation—in other words whether financial institutions should use
1 INTRODUCTION 7
short-term lending to make long-term loans and then sell them on—may
have played a key role.18 The lesson from the nineteenth century was that
banks making long-term investments should avoid short-term wholesale
markets as the source for lending rather than long-term deposits; the exact
lesson Northern Rock forgot, resulting in a bank run in September 2007
that was the first high-profile bank run on any British financial institution
since the crisis of 1866.19 Michie commented that ‘The lessons learnt
over the space of 150 years had been undone in ten’.20
More recently still, in a book published in 2020, based substantially on
episodes in British financial history, William Quinn and Turner conceived
of bubbles as requiring a triangle of three factors: marketability, specula-
tion and cheap credit.21 A bubble requires an asset that can be bought
and sold, cheap credit to fuel the buying of the asset and investors (often
amateur or novice ones) willing to speculate on its future appreciation
in value.22 As the underlying assets that are the subject of bubbles can
be used as the underlying collateral for loans, the financial system can be
vulnerable to when the bubbles pop. The collapse of many such bubbles,
which begin when one side of the triangle of causes suddenly disappears,
can trigger banking crises, such as the role the implosion of the housing
bubble in parts of America and Europe had at the start of the global
financial crisis of 2007–2009.23
Yet although the rise and fall of banking stability in Britain is often
discussed in terms of the structure of the financial sector or the incentives
that bankers are given by regulators or by corporate governance struc-
tures, macroeconomic policy matters for two of the three sides of the
triangle: for cheap credit and speculation. Both are not always naturally
occurring and can be the result of policy decisions. Cheap credit condi-
tions can be created by governments implementing financial repression to
cut the cost of servicing a huge national debt and by the Bank of England
cutting interest rates. That, in turn, can fuel speculation. As Quinn and
Turner themselves note, paraphrasing Walter Bagehot, the great chroni-
cler of Victorian financial markets, ‘investors would often rather invest in
something ridiculous than accept a low interest rate on a safe asset’—a
desire fuelled when policymakers keep rates too low.24 The idea that poli-
cymakers often have a role in creating the credit booms and busts that
led to crises is one of the great insights provided by the Banking School,
an angle that this book explores in detail over the past two centuries of
British financial history.
8 C. READ
A lot has been written about the Bank of England, by official histo-
rians and other scholars. However, this literature has often shied away
from criticising many of the Bank’s actions during previous crises—some-
thing which may not be entirely a surprise seeing that much of it has
been written by current or former employees of the Bank itself.25 For
instance, it has rarely been noted that the Bank of England contributed
to the crises of 1847 and 1857–1858 by keeping interest rates too low
for too long in attempts to boost its market share in the discount market,
and in doing so imperilled wider financial stability; nor that its actions in
1866 also conveniently disposed of its main rival in the discount market,
Overend, Gurney & Co. This has produced a bias, which has not been
fully or explicitly justified, in some of the more recent literature in favour
of the ideas of the Currency School, whose adherents in the nineteenth
century tended to campaign in support of the Bank’s privileges.26 Interest
in the ideas of the Banking School has been relatively neglected in recent
decades, with the notable exception of Matthew Smith’s work that has
excavated the monetary thought of Thomas Tooke.27 Scholars have yet
to fully piece together the Banking School’s ideas on what would now be
called the Carry Trade, how this type of speculation contributed to finan-
cial crises in the nineteenth century, and how managing the Carry Trade
better could prevent similar policy errors and crises in the future. These
are the three tasks this book sets out to achieve.
The Banking School’s ideas have partly been obscured by the slow
progress of economic historians in uncovering the history of how the
macroeconomic weather in Victorian Britain affected the financial sector.
That is, how policies made by government and decisions made by central
bankers may have affected the incentives of the financial community, and
whether this fuelled boom and busts that triggered the banking crises that
scar the economic history of this period. Both economists and historians
have tended to avoid this subject. Some ‘standard’ scholarly literature on
the financial crises of 1847 and 1857–1858 was written as long ago as
the 1950s and was influenced by the ideological preoccupations of the
time about the merits of the gold standard.28 A notable exception was
Mac (H. M.) Boot’s analysis of the 1847 crisis dating from 1984 which
correctly identified the macroeconomic effects of the Irish famine and
‘large speculative flows of bullion’ between London and New York as
throwing the Bank of England’s currency system ‘off course’.29 It is my
reassessment of the causes of the crises of 1847, published as The Great
Famine in Ireland and Britain’s Financial Crisis (2022), that provided
1 INTRODUCTION 9
the inspiration and first case study for the reassessment in this book of
200 years of British financial history.30
The reason for the lack of interest in this topic may be because of the
growing disciplinary divide between economists and historians. Studies of
British financial history using a historical-institutional approach have fallen
out of favour in university economics departments since the 1960s, as Alec
Cairncross has described, in favour of ‘much more rigorous mathematical
models, though ones which tend to assume a given and constant institu-
tional background and whose underlying assumptions often hardly bear
detailed scrutiny’.31 Books seeking to put the Bank of England’s policies
in their historical and institutional context, such as Sir Ralph Hawtrey’s
The Art of Central Banking (1932) and A Century of Bank Rate (1938)
or Richard Sayers’s Central Banking (1957), are no longer produced by
economists in university departments, even though, since these publica-
tions, a plethora of new archives and data has appeared for economists
to work on.32 Neither have economists found that the Banking School’s
ideas render themselves readily accessible to econometric analysis of long-
term series. Meanwhile, most historians feel that they cannot add to the
discussion without complex statistical computations, which most do not
have the skills to undertake. To do real justice to the subject requires
a historian’s experience in digging in the archives combined with an
economist’s rigour when it comes to econometric analysis of the avail-
able economic and financial data. It is from this methodological starting
point that this book springs.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.