Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School Year Report Card: Central Local School District
School Year Report Card: Central Local School District
Your District’s
Designation: Number of State
Indicators Performance
Value-Added
Measure
Excellent Met out of 26 Index Met
26 (0-120 points)
Value-Added
103.1 Component
Score
= Met
✓= met
+ = above
State Percentage of– Students
= below at and above the Proficient Level
Your District Similar Districts * State
Indicators 2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012
The District Report Card for the
3rd Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
2011-2012 school year shows
1. Reading 94.4% 87.0% 79.0%
the progress districts have made
2. Mathematics 93.1% 87.2% 79.8%
based on four measures of
performance. 4th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
3. Reading 92.3% 88.7% 83.3%
4. Mathematics 89.0% 83.7% 78.4%
State
Performance
5th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
Indicators Index
5. Reading 86.4% 83.5% 76.8%
Indicators Performance 6. Mathematics 83.0% 74.8% 67.5%
Index 7. Science 93.2% 80.9% 72.5%
6th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
92.1% 90.6% 86.7%
Value-Added
AYP
Measure 8. Reading
Value-Added
Component
Score
9. Mathematics 81.6% 87.1% 79.9%
Adequate
✓
+
–
= met
= above
= below
Value-Added 7th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
Yearly Progress 10. Reading 89.2% 85.4% 79.5%
11. Mathematics 87.2% 80.7% 73.6%
The combination of the four The state requirement is 75 percent
8th Grade Achievement
measures is the basis for
12. Reading 97.7% 87.0% 83.0%
assigning state designations
13. Mathematics 95.4% 87.5% 79.6%
to districts, buildings and
community schools. 14. Science 95.5% 82.4% 71.5%
Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade) The state requirement is 75 percent
The six designations are 15. Reading 85.9% 89.8% 86.0%
• Excellent with Distinction 16. Mathematics 88.2% 87.5% 82.6%
• Excellent 17. Writing 88.2% 90.9% 87.1%
• Effective 18. Science 84.7% 82.9% 76.7%
• Continuous Improvement 19. Social Studies 91.8% 86.8% 81.6%
• Academic Watch Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)** The
The state
state requirement
requirement is
is 85
85 percent
percent
• Academic Emergency 20. Reading 91.0% 94.9% 92.6%
21. Mathematics 93.3% 93.8% 89.9%
State 22. Writing 91.0% 95.6% 93.0%
Indicators To meet a test indicator for grades 23. Science 92.1% 91.5% 85.6%
3-8 and 10, at least 75% of students 24. Social Studies 91.0% 91.8% 87.8%
tested must score proficient or higher Attendance Rate The state requirement is 93 percent
on that test. Other indicator requirements are: 25. All Grades 95.7% 95.3% 94.5%
11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance 2010-11 Four-Year Graduation Rate The state requirement is 90 percent
Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%. 26. School 91.1% 91.8% 79.7%
Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .
On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov *-- Similar Districts are based on comparing demographic, socioeconomic and geographic factors.
= Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
** Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.
2
State
Indicators
The State
Indicators
are based on state
assessments, as well
as on attendance and
graduation rates.
To earn an indicator
for Achievement or
Graduation Tests, at
least 75% of students
must reach proficient
or above for the given
assessment. For
the 11th grade Ohio
Graduation Tests
indicators, a cumulative
85% passage rate for each
assessment is required.
Performance Index
The Performance
Performance Index Calculations Index reflects the
Performance
for the 2011-2012 School Year Index
achievement of every student
enrolled for the full academic
Performance Level Across Grades year. The Performance Index is a
3-8 and 10 for All Tested Subjects weighted average that includes all
Percentage X Weight = Points
(Includes every student enrolled in
the district for a full academic year) tested subjects and grades and
untested students. The greatest
Untested 0.0 X 0.0 = 0.0 weight is given to advanced scores
2.1 X 0.3 = 0.6
(1.2); the weights decrease for each
Limited
performance level and a weight of
Basic 8.0 X 0.6 = 4.8 zero is given to untested students.
This results in a scale from 0 to 120
Proficient 36.4 X 1.0 = 36.4
points. The Performance Index can be
Accelerated 29.1 X 1.1 = 32.0 compared across years to show
district achievement trends.
Advanced 24.4 X 1.2 = 29.3
Performance Index Over Time
Value-Added Measure
Value-Added
Component
Score
Reading
Mathematics
Legend
Value-Added
Measure Your district’s Value-Added rating represents the progress + = Above
Expected Growth
d
your district has made with its students since last school year.
In contrast, achievement scores represent students’ performance at = Met
Expected Growth
a point in time. A score of “Above” indicates greater than one year of progress
e
w
has been achieved; “Met” indicates one year of progress has been achieved;
“Below” indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.
- = Below
Expected Growth
Reading
Reading Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Met NR Proficiency: Met
Mathematics
Mathematics Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Met NR Proficiency:
Met
Reading
Percent Tested
Mathematics
Mathematics Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Met NR Participation: Met
Graduation
Graduation Rate Met NR NR NR NR NR NR Met NR NR Rate: Met
Attendance
Attendance Rate* Met Rate: Met
Legend
This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this year’s AYP goals.
For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways: For the non-test attendance rate indicator, AYP can be met in one of three ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results; 1) meeting the AYP target with the current year results;
2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results; 2) meeting the AYP target with two-year combined results;
3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor; 3) making improvement over the previous year.
4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.
* Attendance Rate is evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.
For the non-test graduation rate indicator, AYP can be met in one of two ways:
1) meeting the AYP target with the current year results;
2) making a 2 percentage point improvement over the previous year.
Not Required – This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically
NR eliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.
Met This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.
Not Met This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.
Class of 2011 Four-Year Graduation Rate Information Class of 2010 Five-Year Graduation Rate Information
All American Indian/ Asian or Black, Econ. All American Indian/ Asian or Black, Econ.
Students Alaska Native Pacific Islander non-Hispanic Disadvtgd Students Alaska Native Pacific Islander non-Hispanic Disadvtgd
91.1% -- -- -- -- 90.8% -- -- -- --
Limited English Students with White, Limited English Students with White,
Hispanic Multi-Racial Hispanic Multi-Racial
Proficient Disabilities non-Hispanic Proficient Disabilities non-Hispanic
-- -- -- -- 90.8% -- -- -- -- 93.7%
-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. Number of Limited English Proficient Students
Excluded from Accountability Calculations --
The preliminary designation results from identifying the Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added,
higher value between the percentage of indicators met by the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated
your district and your district’s Performance Index. to determine the impact (if any) on the district’s final
AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the designation.
preliminary designation. There are two ways in which
AYP can affect the preliminary designation. 1. If your district’s designation either is increased or decreased
due to AYP, Value-Added has no impact on the designation
1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can be and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.
rated no lower than Continuous Improvement.
2. If your district experiences above expected growth in the
2. If an Excellent or Effective district does not meet AYP current year, your district’s final designation will increase by
for the same two (or more) subgroups for three one designation.
consecutive years, its rating will be decreased to
Effective or Continuous Improvement (respectively). 3. If your district experiences below expected growth for at
least two consecutive years, your district’s final
designation will decrease by one designation.