Name of Employee:  

Name of Rater:  
Rater:   Position:  
Review Period:   Date of Review:  
Bureau Center/Service:   Division:  
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISON OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR

Actua
Weigh Performance Indicator l Rating Score
MFO KRA Objectives Timelines Result
t
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness   Q E T AVE  
Basic I. INSTRUCTIONA LEARNING OUTCOMES Outstanding Attained average of MPS of 87%
Education L LEADERSHIP IMPLEMENTATION (5) and above
Policy AND 1. By the end of the rating            
Services CURRICULUM period, the school head is Very Attained average of MPS of 84%
  (25%) accounted for the learning Satisfactory to 86%
    outcomes in terms of pupil’s OCTOBER (4)            
    mean performance rating from 2020 to 10% Satisfactory Attained average of MPS of 81% to
    ________ to __________ JULY 2021 (3) 83%
           
      Attained average of MPS of 78% to
    Unsatisfactor
y (2) 80%
               
    Poor Attained average of MPS of 77%
(1) and below            
 Actual
Performance Indicator Rating Score
Result
MFO KRA Objectives Timelines Weight
AV
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness   Q E T  
E
    CURRICULUM TECHNICAL 10% 91 to 100% of teachers were
    ASSISTANCE provided technical assistance with
    2. Within the school year, the 2 COTs within the school year
Outstanding
school enhanced instructional along curriculum content,
(5)
competence of teachers by teaching strategies, and
providing Technical Assistance on assessment of learning in different
content mastery, varied and learning areas.            
innovative teaching strategies 81 to 90% of teachers were
and appropriate assessment tools provided technical assistance with
and techniques through Very 2 COTs within the school year
Instructional monitoring, Satisfactory along curriculum content,
Classroom Observation, School (4) teaching strategies, and
based INSET and SLAC in line with assessment of learning in different
the implementation of the K to learning areas.            
12 curriculum and other 71 to 80% of teachers were
curricular PPAs. OCTOBER provided technical assistance with
2020 to 2 COTs within the school year
Satisfactory
.  JULY 2021 along curriculum content,
(3)
  teaching strategies, and
  assessment of learning in different
    learning areas.            
  61 to 70% of teachers were
provided technical assistance with
2 COTs within the school year
Unsatisfactory
along curriculum content,
(2)
teaching strategies, and
assessment of learning in different
learning areas.            
Poor 60% and below of teachers were            
(1) provided technical assistance with
2 COTs within the school year
along curriculum content,
teaching strategies, and
assessment of learning in different
 learning areas.

Performance Indicator Actual Rating

MFO KRA Objectives Timelines Weight Score
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness Result Q E T AVE
    DEVELOPMENT OF QUALITY Prospective Subject Matter Experts
    INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS (SMEs), Subject Area Content Writers
  3. By the end of the rating Outstanding and Learning Resource Developers
period ,_____CS/ES has (5) trained and certified by the school
head and the PSDS and developed 5
organized functional teams of
contextualized IMs.            
Subject Matter Experts, Quality Prospective Subject Matter Experts
Assurance Team, Subject Area (SMEs), Subject Area Content Writers
content writers to carry out the and Learning Resource Developers
systematic production and Very
were identified, screened for
distribution of contextually Satisfactory
competence, trained and certified by
relevant Self-Learning Modules (4) the school head and the PSDS a
(SLMs), Learning Activity Sheets month late of the identified timeline
(LAS), with 4 contextualized IMs.            
TV/RBI contents and other Prospective Subject Matter Experts
(SMEs), Subject Area Content Writers
Curriculum resources.
and Learning Resource Developers
were identified, screened for
OCTOBER 5% Satisfactory
competence, trained and certified by
2020 to (3) the school head and the PSDS two
JULY 2021 months late of the identified timeline
  with 3 contextualized
  IMs.            
  Prospective Subject Matter Experts
  (SMEs), Subject Area Content Writers
and Learning Resource Developers
were
Unsatisfactory
identified, screened for competence,
(2) trained and certified by the school
head and the PSDS three months late
of the identified timeline with 2
contextualized IMs.            
Prospective Subject Matter Experts
Poor (SMEs), Subject Area Content Writers
(1) and Learning Resource Developers
were identified, screened for            
 competence, trained and certified by
the school head and the PSDS only at
the start of the last quarter of the
current year with 1 contextualized IM.

Performance Indicator Actual Rating

MFO KRA Objectives Timelines Weight Score
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness Result Q E T AVE
II. SCHOOL FUND MANAGEMENT January 5- 100% of P1,295,000.00 utilization and
Outstanding
LEADERSHIP, 1. By the end of the calendar 2021 to submission of MOOE and other funds
(5)
MANAGEMEN year, the School Head has December
Very 4- 85-99% or P 1,100,750.00 to P 1,282,050.00
T AND accounted and submitted 2021
Satisfactory utilization and submission of MOOOE and other
OPERATIONS 100% utilization of the funds.
(20%) school MOOE and other (4)
3- 70-84% or P 906, 500.00 to P 1,087,800.00
funds. 10% Satisfactory
utilization and submission of MOOE and other
(3) funds
2- 50-69% or P 647,500.00 to P893,550.00
Unsatisfactory
utilization and submission of MOOE and other
(2) funds.
Poor 1- 49% or P 634, 550.00 and below utilization and
(1) submission of MOOE and other funds.
SCHOOL-BASED October 10% The SBM is fully updated with one step higher
MANAGEMENT 2020 to level of practice and completed/ updated 5
Outstanding
2. By the end of the rating July 2021 principles, from the previous SBM validation
(5) result as baseline, evidenced by the Validated
period, the School Based
artifacts.
Management is improved
The SBM is partially updated with one step higher
effectively from one level Very level of practice and partially updated 5
of practice by assessing Satisfactory principles, from the previous SBM Validation
through validation in the (4) Result as baseline, evidenced by the validated
school, district and artifacts
division level. The SBM is partially updated with one step higher
level of practice and partially updated 5
Satisfactory
principles, from the previous SBM Validation
(3) Result as baseline, evidenced by the validated
artifacts
The SBM is partially updated with one step higher
level of practice and partially updated 5
Unsatisfactory
principles, from the previous SBM Validation
(2) Result as baseline, evidenced by the validated
artifacts
Poor The SBM is partially updated with one step higher
 level of practice and partially updated 5
principles, from the previous SBM Validation
(1)
Result as baseline, evidenced by the validated
artifacts

Performance Indicator Actual Rating

MFO KRA Objectives Timelines Weight Score
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness Result Q E T AVE
III. LEARNING BE-LCP IMPLEMENTATION October Five Initiated and completed innovations and/or
Outstanding
EVIRONMENT 1. By the end of the rating 2020 to researches within the School year.
(5)
(20%) period, the school initiated July 2021
Very Four Initiated and completed innovations and/or
and completed
Satisfactory researches within the School year.
innovations and/or
researches that (4)
5% Satisfactory Three Initiated and completed innovations
contributed to the
(3) and/or researches within the School year.
implementation of BE-LCP.
Unsatisfactory Two Initiated and completed innovations and/or
(2) researches within the School year.
Poor One Initiated and completed innovations and/or
(1) researches within the School year.
ENHANCED SIP/ ESIP October 10% 90% - 100% of the programs, activities and
2. By the end of the School 2020 to projects were implemented, with
Outstanding
Year 2020-2021, the July 2021 95% - 100% disbursement rate of funds from
(5) MOOE and other sources of funds within the
school has efficiently and
school year.
effectively implemented
80% - 89% of the programs, activities and projects
programs, activities and Very were implemented, with
projects (PAPs) as Satisfactory 90% - 94% disbursement rate of funds from
reflected in the Revised (4) MOOE and other sources of funds within the
Enhanced School school year.
Improvement Plan (ESIP), 70% - 79% of the programs, activities and projects
Annual Implementation were implemented, with
Satisfactory
Plan (AIP) and Work and 85% - 89% disbursement rate of funds from
(3) MOOE and other sources of funds within the
Financial Plan (WFP).
school year.
60% - 69% of the programs, activities and projects
were implemented, with
Unsatisfactory
80% - 84% disbursement rate of funds from
(2) MOOE and other sources of funds within the
school year.
Poor 50% - 59% of the programs, activities and projects
(1) were implemented, with
 75% - 79% disbursement rate of funds from
MOOE and other sources of funds within the
school year.

Performance Indicator Actual Rating

MFO KRA Objectives Timelines Weight Score
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness Result Q E T AVE
CHILD-FRIENDLY LEARNING October There was no reported/ recorded incident on
ENVIRONMENT 2020 to the implementation of modular learning
Outstanding
3. By the end of the rating July 2021 delivery modality that violated the child
(5)
period, the school has protection policy during the child and parent
ensured a child friendly learning interaction at home.
learning environment at There was 1 reported/ recorded incident on
home by orienting the Very the implementation of modular learning
parents/ guardians about Satisfactory delivery modality that violated the child
Modular Distance Learning (4) protection policy during the child and parent
Modality and Child learning interaction at home.
Protection Policy There was 2 reported/ recorded incident on
the implementation of modular learning
Satisfactory
5% delivery modality that violated the child
(3)
protection policy during the child and parent
learning interaction at home.
There was 3 reported/ recorded incident on
the implementation of modular learning
Unsatisfactory
delivery modality that violated the child
(2)
protection policy during the child and parent
learning interaction at home.
There was 4 and above reported/ recorded
incident on the implementation of modular
Poor
learning delivery modality that violated the
(1)
child protection policy during the child and
parent learning interaction at home.

MFO KRA Objectives
IV. HUMAN FUNCTIONAL LAC SCALABLE
RESOURCE CONTENTS ON ASSESSMENT
MANAGEMEN OF LEARNING
T AND 1. By the end of the rating
DEVELOPMENT period, the school has
developed LAC scalable
contents on Assessment of
Learning specifically on
formulating diagnostic,
formative and summative
test in all learning areas
and grade levels of K to 12
curriculum.
Performance Indicator Actual Rating
Timelines Weight Score
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness Result Q E T AVE
October 10 and above LAC scalable training contents
2020 to on Assessment of Learning in all subject
Outstanding
July 2021 Areas were developed and cascaded LACs
(5)
before the end of the school year with
corresponding outputs for all learning area.
8 to 9 LAC scalable training contents on
Assessment of Learning in all subject Areas
Very
were developed and cascaded LACs before
Satisfactory
the end of the school year with
(4)
corresponding outputs of 80% to 99% of the
subjects offered.
6 to 7 LAC scalable training contents on
Assessment of Learning in all subject Areas
Satisfactory were developed and cascaded LACs before
10% (3) the end of the school year with
corresponding outputs of 60% to 79% of the
subjects offered.
4 to 5 LAC scalable training contents on
Assessment of Learning in all subject Areas
Unsatisfactory were developed and cascaded LACs before
(2) the end of the school year with
corresponding outputs of 40% to 59% of the
subjects offered.
3 and below LAC scalable training contents
on Assessment of Learning in all subject
Poor Areas were developed and cascaded LACs
(1) before the end of the school year with
corresponding outputs of 39% and below of
the subjects offered.

MFO KRA Objectives
LEARNING AND
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
2. By the end of the school
year, all teachers have
participated in the
professional Learning and
Development (L&D)
programs in school/
district/ division/ regional/
national or international
level based on the
Learning Development
Needs Assessment (LDNA).
Performance Indicator Actual Rating
Timelines Weight Score
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness Result Q E T AVE
October 91% to 100% of teachers have participated in
2020 to professional learning and development in
Outstanding
July 2021 school/ district/ division/ regional/ national
(5)
or international level based on the Training
Needs Analysis (TNA)
81% to 90% of teachers have participated in
Very professional learning and development in
Satisfactory school/ district/ division/ regional/ national
(4) or international level based on the Training
Needs Analysis (TNA)
71% to 80% of teachers have participated in
professional learning and development in
Satisfactory
5% school/ district/ division/ regional/ national
(3)
or international level based on the Training
Needs Analysis (TNA)
61% to 70% of teachers have participated in
professional learning and development in
Unsatisfactory
school/ district/ division/ regional/ national
(2)
or international level based on the Training
Needs Analysis (TNA)
60% and below of teachers have participated
in professional learning and development in
Poor
school/ district/ division/ regional/ national
(1)
or international level based on the Training
Needs Analysis (TNA)
 Performance Indicator Actual Rating
MFO KRA Objectives Timelines Weight Score
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness Result Q E T AVE
V. PARENT’S BRIGADA ESKWELA PLUS October Outstanding Increment of 91% to 100% over the last years
INVOLVEMENT 1. By the end of the rating 2020 to (5) equivalent generated amount.
AND period, the school has July 2021
COMMUNITY generated an amount Very Increment of 81% to 90% over the last years
PARTNERSHIP through Brigada Eskwela Satisfactory generated amount.
(15%) Plus/ Adopt a School (4)
5% Satisfactory Increment of 71% to 80% over the last years
Program with
stakeholders. (3) generated amount.
Unsatisfactory Increment of 61% to 70% over the last years
(2) generated amount.
Poor Increment of 60% and below over the last
(1) years generated amount.
PRIORITY SCHOOL PROGRAM October Outstanding The school effectively and efficiently
AND PROJECTS 2020 to (5) organized stakeholders mapping activity with
2. By the end of the 1st July 2021 5 implemented priority programs and
quarter, the school has projects.
organized an effective The school effectively and efficiently
Very
stakeholder mapping organized stakeholders mapping activity with
Satisfactory
activity that would identify 4 implemented priority programs and
(4)
prospective partners to projects.
support and implement The school effectively and efficiently
identified priority school 5% Satisfactory organized stakeholders mapping activity with
program and projects. (3) 3 implemented priority programs and
projects.
The school effectively and efficiently
Unsatisfactory organized stakeholders mapping activity with
(2) 2 implemented priority programs and
projects.
Poor The school conceptualized stakeholders
(1) mapping activity without implementation.
 Performance Indicator Actual Rating
MFO KRA Objectives Timelines Weight Score
Scale Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness Result Q E T AVE
BE-LCP SUPPORT October 91% to 100% attendance of parents and
Outstanding
3. By the end of every 2020 to active participation in the implementation of
(5)
quarter, the school has July 2021 the BE-LCP.
intensified support among Very 81% to 90% attendance of parents and active
the members of the Satisfactory participation in the implementation of the
HRPTA/ GPTA as (4) BE-LCP.
demonstrated by active 71% to 80% attendance of parents and active
Satisfactory
participation in the 5% participation in the implementation of the
(3)
implementation of BE-LCP BE-LCP.
during the distribution and 61% to 70% attendance of parents and active
retrieval of learning Unsatisfactory
participation in the implementation of the
materials, feedback giving (2)
BE-LCP.
on performance 50% and below attendance of parents and
assessment and other Poor
active participation in the implementation of
relative concerns. (1)
the BE-LCP.
VI. PLUS ________________ October Outstanding
FACTOR 2020 to (5)
5% July 2021
Very
Satisfactory
(4)
5% Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
TOTAL 100%

Adjectival Rating Scale

Outstanding 4.500 – 5.00
Very Satisfactory 3.500 – 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 – 3.499 _____________________ _____________________________ ________________________
Unsatisfactory 1.500 – 2.499
Poor 1.00 – 1.499
PRINCIPAL
RATEE RATER Approving Authority