Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONNECTORS (21)
Be that as it may. While nobody can deny that…I would like to.
NOUNS (24)
VOLUNTEERING TYPES (3)
Aid work
Community service
Humanitarian cause
OTHERS (4)
Volunteers Applicants
Aid Help
A hand Service
Assistance Support
OTHERS (11)
Aim Needy
Background Outcomes
Deprivation Outcomes
Effort Workload
Experience
ADJECTIVES
Reluctant (reticente)
Dubious Undecided
Grudging: reticente Unshakeable
Hesitant
Polémico
Controversial Meaningful
Disputed Polemical
Lively debated
Ajeno, ignotante
Ignorant of C2 Unconcerned
Inattentive Unfamiliar
Oblivious Uninformed
Unaware
Others
Forthcoming Unskilled
Instructed Unfamiliar
Willing to Wise
VERBS
Think throughly
Consider Ponder
Meditate
Prevent from
Force
Persuade
Encourage Urge
Defender
Cause
Restrict
Constrain Inhibit
Curtail Repress
Others
Agree Inhibit
Alleviate Involve
Be on board Irk
Be subject to Justify
Bring Offer
Capitalise on Open up
Commit to Participate in
ADVERBS
Remarkably
Significantly
Slightly
COLLOCATIONS
Redeeming (positive) quality Unrivalled opportunity
EXPRESSIONS
Deter others from sticking My thoughts lean towards
IDIOMS
Play the Devil's Advocate -> Argues for sth
A Bolt from the Blue -> Sth unexpected
unpopular
Pie in the Sky -> Something that you hope Go the Extra Mile -> You have to do more
will happen but is very unlikely to happen than is expected
Tall Order -> Difficult requirement or Success, Like Beauty, Lies in the Eyes of
challenging task the Beholder.
EJEMPLO.
Estructura.
Volunteers or Government: Who are in charge when wars break out?
Volunteers truly fight for the cause as their willingness to fight blooms from their inside.
Counter argument: Governments have more power of decision.
Rebuttal: They are coerced to defend their interests as it what they are called for.
The nation's support is stronger if they see themselves reflected in the volunteers, feeling
identified with them and the cause they defend.
Counter argument:
Rebuttal:
Final idiom: Actions Speak Louder than Words.
WRITING.
The management of wars is acknowledged as a controversial topic since the first one in history broke
out. While some uphold that it is governments who should deal with the situation, others advocate for
volunteers to take up the cudgels for their country. My thoughts lean towards the last group as
candidates will truly fight for the cause and the nation will be led by their example.
It stands reason that volunteers will truly fight for their country and its interests as their
willingness to protect their people blooms from their inside. I am not inattentive that political
authoritieshold a greatest amount of power of decision and can, therefore, spark off determinant
changes just by negotiating with other countries. Nonetheless, in many cases, politicians are coerced
to defend the nation’s interest on account of what it is expected from them so they might tend to make
unwise decisions due to the unrelenting pressure they have to cope with.
It is beyond reasonable doubt that the nation’s support towards volunteers will be stronger as
they deem themselves more reflected in them rather than in governments, now that they consider
them true human beings as them engaging in a cause instead of a political institution. Some schools
of thought might assert that people’s backing is not as crucial as an established plan by the state,
however, the less the country is poised to preserve the same objective, the harder it will be to
persevere in the same direction.
Not to beat around the bush, though one could deem governments action’s more immediate,
they tend to be less effective as they do not flourish from a true intention of saving the country’s
inhabitants and they do not benefit from people’s support since governments do not provide them a
cause worth fighting for making it impossible for them to do their bit.
1. Should college and university admissions offices punish applicants who have done
no volunteer work but have instead focused more on their academics and perhaps
even worked to save money for their education?
Volunteering is in essence non mandatory, a practice that blooms from the candidates’
willingness;therefore, there should be no bias towards those volunteering.I am not oblivious that aid
work provides scholars with needful skills in their significant leap towards university, as they are
compelled to cope with apparently new social issues.Notwithstanding, were undergraduates to
partake in a community service, they should do it on account of their own eagerness and not seeking
a treat of favor when entering college.
Furthermore, each student encounters diverse personal hindrances, so they may not have tons of
time to devote to a humanitarian cause.It is reasonable that some charitable acts do not entail
endless hours of working, but not every pupil is poised to make such endeavour. For instance,
scholars might be coerced to engage in part-time jobs in a bid to afford college tuition or may be
deeply committed to their academics.
Bringing up the rear,though some advocate for those having formerly volunteered, it is discernible
that not everyone is resolute to take on such a tall order. Hence, volunteering achievements ought to
be a plus, not a must.