Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In case of two type of carriers the Hall Coefficient is given 3. Voltage Measurement: Hall voltage measure-
by: ments, influenced by galvanomagnetic and thermo-
magnetic effects, require careful consideration. Av-
EH EH µ2h p − µ2e n eraging readings helps eliminate unwanted effects,
RH = = = (4)
Jx H σEx H e(µh p + µe n)2 and adjusting current values ensures accurate read-
ings in varying magnetic fields.
4. Sample Dimensions: While the formula assumes
C. Magnetoresistance:
carriers move only lengthwise, a closer-to-ideal sit-
uation may be achieved with a crystal length three
Magnetoresistance is the property of a material to times its width.
change the value of its electrical resistance when an ex-
ternal magnetic field is applied to it. The resistance of
a metal is in general increased by a magnetic field. For 2. Additional Considerations for Bismuth Strip
sufficiently small magnetic fields this dependence may, of Measurements:
course, be expressed by the equation:
1. Resistivity Variation: Acknowledge that resis-
∆R
= BH 2 (5) tivity in the specimen may smoothly vary from
R point to point, often within an accepted tolerance.
The coefficient B is a proportionality constant depending 2. High Resistance Issues: High resistance or rec-
on the dimensions of the sample. tification actions in electrical contacts to the spec-
With the magnetic field on; the Hall voltage compensates imen can pose challenges and need attention.
exactly the Lorentz force for carriers with average veloc-
ity; slower carriers will be over compensated and faster
ones undercompensated, resulting in trajectories that are 3. Overall Experimental Precautions:
not along the applied field. This results in an effective
decrease of the mean free path and hence an increase in
1. Avoid Soldering Directly: Soldered probe con-
resistivity.
tacts may disrupt current flow and affect sample
properties due to heat and contamination. Pres-
sure contacts, although potentially noisy, can be a
D. Principles of Measurement in Semiconductor viable alternative.
Experiments
2. Controlled Current: Keep the current through
General Considerations for All Measurements: the specimen at a level that avoids heating, and
address injecting effects by minimizing voltage drop
at the contacts.
1. Probe Contacts: Using soldered probe contacts,
while desirable, may disrupt current flow and cause 3. Method of Averaging: Use the method of av-
shorting. Pressure contacts can mitigate these eraging readings to eliminate unwanted effects in
issues, although they may introduce some noise, Hall voltage measurements, and consider using a
manageable by maintaining clean and firm contact. constant current power supply for stability.
IV. OBSERVATIONS:
V. GRAPHS:
(a) Hall Voltage(mV) vs Magnetic Field (Gauss) (b) Hall Coefficient(m3 C −1 ) vs Temperature(◦ C)
Figure 1: (a) Hall Voltage(mV) vs Magnetic Field (Gauss) in Si and Ge n&p type Semi-Conductors (Probe Current
= 4mA) (b) Temperature Dependence of Hall Coefficient in Ge p-type Semi-Conductor (Probe Current = 4 mA)
7
Figure 2: (a) Hall Voltage(mV) vs Mganetic Field(x10)(Gauss) in Bismuth (b) Change in Linear Resistance vs
Magnetic Field(Tesla) showing Magnetoresistance at room Temperature of 298K
8
VI. CALCULATION AND ERROR ANALYSIS: Table X: Calculation and Error Analysis Table Based
on IV
A. Hall Coefficient in Semiconductors and
Si n-type
Temperature Dependence of Hall Coefficient: x(Magnetic Field(Gauss)) y(Hall Voltage(mV)) xy x2 y2
6 -5.1 -3.06E+01 36.00 2.60E+01
14 -10.5 -1.47E+02 196.00 1.10E+02
21 -15.6 -3.28E+02 441.00 2.43E+02
27 -20.7 -5.59E+02 729.00 4.28E+02
Table XII: Calculation and Error Analysis Table based Table XIV: Calculation of Hall Coefficient in Bismuth
on VI at Room Temperature XI XII XIII
Bismuth Probe Current(mA): 144.5 Sl No Probe Current Hall Coefficient Error in Hall Coefficient
x(Magnetic Field(x10)(Gauss)) y(Hall Voltage(mV)) xy x2 y2
1 159.9 -184.23E-09 -007.37E-09
23 -0.001 -2.30E-02 529.00 1.00E-06
91 -0.005 -4.55E-01 8281.00 2.50E-05
2 144.5 -169.57E-09 -005.64E-09
171 -0.011 -1.88E+00 29241.00 1.21E-04 3 129.9 -140.78E-09 -004.06E-09
254 -0.017 -4.32E+00 64516.00 2.89E-04 Hall Coefficient -164.86E-09 m3 C −1
334 -0.021 -7.01E+00 111556.00 4.41E-04 Error in Hall Coefficient -009.80E-09 m3 C −1
408 -0.026 -1.06E+01 166464.00 6.76E-04
484 -0.028 -1.36E+01 234256.00 7.84E-04
557 -0.032 -1.78E+01 310249.00 1.02E-03
619 -0.034 -2.10E+01 383161.00 1.16E-03 Table XV: Calculation of Carrier Number Density in
678 -0.037 -2.51E+01 459684.00 1.37E-03
724 -0.039 -2.82E+01 524176.00 1.52E-03 Bismuth at Room Temperature XI XII XIII
765 -0.04 -3.06E+01 585225.00 1.60E-03
796 -0.041 -3.26E+01 633616.00 1.68E-03
824 -0.042 -3.46E+01 678976.00 1.76E-03 Sl No Probe Current Number Density Error in Number Density
851 -0.043 -3.66E+01 724201.00 1.85E-03 1 159.9 033.88E+24 001.35E+24
873 -0.044 -3.84E+01 762129.00 1.94E-03 2 144.5 036.81E+24 001.22E+24
Sum Sum Sum Sum Sum 3 129.9 044.33E+24 001.28E+24
8452.00 -4.61E-01 -3.03E+02 5676260.00 1.62E-02
Number Density 038.34E+24
n 16 Delta 19383856
Slope m: -4.90E-05 Intercept: -2.93E-03
Error in Number Density 002.28E+24
error in slope: 1.63E-06
Hall Coefficient: -169.57E-09 m3 C −1 Error in Hall Coefficient: -005.64E-09
Number Density: 036.81E+24 Error in number Density: 001.22E+24
Phonon scattering affects both electrons and holes but Clearly from the negative value of the hall coefficient
has a stronger influence on electrons due to their lower obtained, we can tell that bismuth has n-type carriers,
effective mass compared to holes. also comparison of the carrier umber density clearly
shows that Bismuth being a metal has more carriers
At high temperatures, the mobility of electrons can than Semi-Conductors like Ge or Si
become greater than that of holes due to the increased
influence of phonon scattering. As a result, the contribu-
tion of electrons to the Hall effect can start to dominate, Regarding the change in linear resistance with respect
leading to a change in the sign of the Hall coefficient to applied magnetic field seen in graph 2:
from positive to negative. The graph shows a good quadratic fit matching with
the theory of magnetoresistance which suggest quadratic
This change in sign of the Hall coefficient is often increase in linear resistance with increasing applied mag-
associated with a transition from p-type to n-type con- netic field. This is not true for all metals, but Bismuth
ductivity behavior in the semiconductor. It signifies a shows this unique property of magnetoresistance.
shift in the majority carrier type from holes to electrons The quadratic magnetoresistance in bismuth arises
as the dominant charge carriers. due to its unique electronic structure, particularly the
presence of nearly massless charge carriers known as
The exact temperature at which this sign change Dirac fermions. Bismuth is a semimetal with a small
occurs and the behavior of the Hall coefficient with energy gap between its valence and conduction bands,
temperature beyond that point can vary depending on and near the band edges, the electronic dispersion
factors such as the specific material properties, impurity relation takes on a linear form reminiscent of relativistic
concentrations, and sample preparation conditions. Dirac fermions