Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Méliné MIGUIRDITCHIAN
Sigrid MIRABAUD
Raphaël ROIG
Spirit
and
Materials
of
Ethiopian
Icons
Spirit
and
Materials
of
Ethiopian
Icons
A corpus of sixteen icons has thus been selected on the ground of their
importance for the history of ancient Ethiopian painting. The selected icons
first focus on what happened in the artistic circles gravitating around the royal
court in the 15th and early 16th centuries – comparing materials and techniques
of both the Ethiopian painters at the court and the Italian painters employed in
Ethiopia. The study further touches the artistic renewal which took place
around the court recently installed in the new city of Gonder during the first
half of the 17th century, as well as its developments in the 18th century.
Ethiopian artists do not usually sign their work. On the other hand, the donor
has his/her name inscribed in the prayer formulas and blessings added to the text in
the manuscripts and, more exceptionally, ordered the painting of his/her portrait in a
manuscript or in a cycle of murals. It is the case of King Yekuno Amlak (1270-1285),
represented in the church of Guennete Maryam (“Paradise of Mary”), a few kilometers
from Lalibela (3).
በአኰቴተ፡ እግዚአብሔር፡ ዘአሕነጽኩ፡ አነ፡ ይኵኖ፡ አምላክ፡ ንጉሥ፡ ዘአንገሠኒ፡
እግዚአብሔር፡ በፈቃዱ፡ ንሕዮ፡ በክርስቶስ፡ አቡየ፡ ላእከ፡ ኮነኒ፡ ወአሕነጸ፡ ሊተ፡ ዘንተ፡ ቤተ፡
ክርስቲያን፡ በስመ፡ መጣዕ፡፡ ይምሐረኒ፡ እግዚአብሔር፡ በመንግሥተ፡ ስማያት፡ ምስለ፡ አቡዋንየ፡ 3
መሐሪ፡ አምላክ፡ ወንሕዮ፡ አሜን፡
“In giving thanks to God. It is I who has [this church] built, [I], Yekweno Amlak whom God made king by his [good]
will. My father, Nehyo Bekrestos, was an agent for me to have [and has] this church built in the name of Metta. May God
have mercy upon me in the Kingdom of Heaven with my fathers Meheri Amlak and Nehyo [Bekrestos]. Amen.”
Ethiopian Painting
The art of icons in Ethiopia
Ethiopian painters painted icons, but none prior to the 15th century have
been preserved. At that time, the introduction of new rituals in the liturgy
required the production of a great number of icons.
King Dawit (1379/82-1412) had the habit of praying in front of an image of
the Virgin. This veneration that Dawit devoted to the Virgin is at the root of the
Marian policy of his son Zere Yaqob (1434-1468). During the 1440’s, in his
theological treatises and his ‘’Preliminary Rite’’ for the reading of the ‘’Miracles
of Mary’’ which he made obligatory for the thirty-two annual feasts of the
Virgin, he gave precise instructions on the presentation of images of Mary in
public, thus breathing life into a new dynamism to the cult of Mary.
The new rituals introduced into the office of Sunday mid-day and the
Marian feasts required that each church would have a painting of the Virgin on
wood (1). Failing that, the king recommended replacing it with a hand-cross.
The icon of the Virgin had to be carried in procession before being placed upon
a throne under a dais, with a cross to its right. It was incensed according to the
rhythm of hymns and the psalms accompanied by liturgical dances and
processions. 1
Certain very rare images, called images of salvation (’’seʿele adheno’’), are
the object of exceptional veneration: taken out on the occasion of an annual
feast, they are handled with extreme care because their power is so feared. The
rest of the time they are guarded carefully in the central sanctuary of the church
(’’meqdes’’) or the treasury (’’eqe biet’’) and the faithful come to prostrate
themselves in front of the building on departing from the office.
The lives of the saints show the miracles accomplished by the Virgin when the
saints pray in front of her image. Thus, George of Segla prayed in front of an icon of
the Virgin, despairing of not being able to understand the teaching which had been
given to him; she appeared to him to give him the cure which enabled him to become
the greatest theologian of his time during the reign of King Dawit (1379/82-1412). In
the same way, in the 15th century, the abbot of Debre Libanos, Merhe Krestos, was
praying in church in front of a painting of the Virgin when the image appeared to him
“clothed in flesh”, leaned towards him and spoke to him.
ወእንዘ፡ ይጼሊ፡ ከመዝ፡ አስተርአየቶ፡ ሥዕል በልብሰተ፡ ሥጋ፡ ወደነነት፡ ሎቱ፡ ከመ፡
ዘትብሎ፡ ሖር፡፡
“When he was praying, the painting appears to him clothed in flesh and leant on
him as she was telling him: go!”
Varnish
Paint layer
Underdrawing
Ground layer
Canvas
Sizing layer
Type 1 (frequent) Type 2 (seldom)
Wood
Varnish An organic fluid which becomes, after it has dried, a transparent protective film on the surface of the painting. It is
characterized by its transparency, its flexibility, its ease of application and its brilliance. It saturates the colours.
Paint layer It is made up of two types of elements: the pigment or the dye which gives the colour and the binder which permits to
use the colour as paint.
A pigment is an insoluble coloured material dispersed in a binding medium in order to create a colour. Pigments are mostly inorganic
(minerals, metals) but can also be produced from organic materials (charcoal, lacquer). They can be natural or artificial. Certain
pigments which are found in nature have been artificially recreated. It is case of the orpiment and of realgar which both come in natural
and artificial form. Another example, cinnabar is a natural pigment while its artificial copy is vermilion.
Certain colours are not obtained from pigments but from dyes. Dyes are organic in nature and are extracted from plants. Indigo is one
such example. Dyes are soluble in the binder.
Binders are film-forming substances that bind and congregate pigments or dyes and fix them to the ground layer. Binders are often
organic. They can be of different types: oil; distemper (made of glue or casein); tempera (made of egg); encaustic (made of wax).
Underdrawing Icon painters first draw a preparatory sketch with fine dark lines on the ground layer before painting. It is sometimes
possible to discern the underdrawing through the paint layer.
Ground layer The first stratum of the paint layer is composed of both a pigment (white in the case of the Ethiopian icons)
and a binder. Its role is to make the support (wood or canvas) suitable for painting. It can be either white or coloured, applied
in one or more layers and contributes fully to the colour effect of the painting. The making of the ground layer requires much
care for its role is crucial in the painting process.
Canvas Most of Ethiopian icons are painted directly on wood but, in a number of cases, a piece of cloth is glued onto wood and used
as a support for painting.
Sizing layer In exceptional cases, a sizing layer is laid onto wood to insure the adherence between the canvas and the wooden
support. This sizing layer is an adhesive, whether natural or synthetic. Most are of organic origin and may contain various additives.
Natural adhesives can be obtained using animal bones, beeswax, fish, starch…
Icon: Strata
n Calcium
milio Sulp
Ver hat
e
I
nd
t
en
igo
im
Blu
Orp
e
Iron Oxide
Minium
rid e
L ea
hlo
dW
rC
e
h it
pe
p
Co
Gre
en E s h
a r th Varni
Indigo Known for a long time, it is a dye extracted from plants containing
indigotin. When indigo is solved in an oil binder, it takes the shape of nodules
visible in the strata with a microscope. This colour is called ‘’nil’’ in Ethiopia.
Iron oxide This cheap mineral pigment is one of the most abundant on
the earth. Iron oxide pigments produce a wide range of colours, from black
through shades of purple and red to yellow, orange and brown. On our
example, a red one has been mixed with lead white.
Varnish There are different ways of making a varnish. On these icons, the
varnish was made of a drying oil, probably cooked with a drier (lead or cobalt
salts) and applied onto the paint layer. This specific type of icon varnish is
called olifa. It darkens much through time.
Lead white This basic lead carbonate has been one of the first known
artificial mineral pigments and is one of the most used white pigments.
Obtained from lead metal, and therefore quite toxic, it is often blended with
coloured pigments.
Minium Early used in Art, the mineral minium is found in small amounts
in many localities. It is a lead tetraoxide made artificially and is bright red, with
an orange hue. It is sometimes used instead of cinnabar, which is more
expensive.
The examination of the organic elements (on the right) explores first the
different strata of the painting (varnish, paint layer, ground layer etc.) by optical
microscopy. Thereafter, their mineral constituents are identified by electronic
microscopy. Therefore a microflake of the edge of a damaged area is removed
with a scalpel.
The analysis of the organic elements (on the left) deals with the chemical
composition of the organic compounds (varnish, binder, adhesive). A tiny
sample of the selected area is scrapped out of the painting with great care.
Preparation
0rganic analysis
GC - MS
Chromatogram Samples are analyzed as solutions, so materials of interest (e.g. binders, varnishes, adhesives
etc.) need to be solvent extracted from the paint sample. The extract is injected into the G.C.
inlet where it is vaporized and swept onto a chromatographic column by the carrier gas. The
sample flows through the column and the compounds are separated by virtue of their relative
interaction with the coating of the column (stationary phase) and the carrier gas (mobile phase).
Mass spectra
From the identification of the sample, one can deduce its composition.
The end part of the column passes through a heated transfer line and ends at the ion source of the mass spectrometer.
Molecules are converted to ions by a beam of electrons, giving rise to molecular ions. Due to the high energy imparted to
molecular ions, they are fragmented producing further smaller ions with characteristic relative abundance that provide a
‘’fingerprint’’ for each molecule, hence its identification.
The Processes
Binocular
Mineral analysis
The analysis starts with an
observation of the sample through a
binocular. If no scientific conclusion
can be drawn, this step is all the
same crucial. It is the best way to
select among all the samples the one
which is worth the whole inorganic
analysis.
The sample is then sealed Once cut and polished, the resin block is observed
in a resin block. It is first put through an optical microscope. The microscope enlarges
on a dried resin layer. A the picture of the sample (50, 100 or 200 times, as on
second resin layer is then our example) and allows viewing its details. Normal light
layed over it. Thereafter, the upper (up right picture) or UV rays (down right picture) can
resin block is cut and resin layer be used. A camera is fixed onto the microscope and the
polished till the surface of the pictures are directly transfered to a computer. Note that
sample (dashed line) is lower
resin layer these pictures do not exactly match the colours that one
reached.
can see on the painting.
of Analysis
The Icon The palette
If one looks at the icon with the As it appears to the naked eye, the painter used primary colours, that is yellow
naked eye, and then through UV (1), blue (3) and red, and complemented his palette with green (4), orange (6),
rays, one can see how it has been deep red (7), white and black. However, the oxidised varnish (5) caused blisters to
composed and establish a list of appear on the surface of the painting, thereby hindering the reading of the work. In
the colours used and the manner fact, certain colours seem to have been mixed. For example, in the case of the
they were applied. mantles of the apostles (3, 4), it is difficult to distinguish blue from green. Does this
This particular icon was effect come from the painter’s technique or from the weathering of the materials?
executed by the Italian painter To render the folds of the drapes, the painter superimposed the coloured layers:
Nicolo Brancaleon, from Venice. strokes of blue on the red cloth (2). On the front of the icon, the coloured layer is
We do not know how old he was covered with a thick coat of varnish (5). This varnish is not present in the lacunae,
when he landed in Ethiopia in the which may indicate that it could be original. It is heavily oxidised. Small circular
beginning of the 1480’s, or what his blisters, brown in colour, are visible. This type of damage evokes a particular type
training had been in Italy. However, of varnish found on Russian icons, the oil-based olifa.
there is reason to believe that he On the painting, we can also observe moisture developing (8). Has it reached the
came when he was young because coloured layer or is it located in the varnish only? Examination with a microscope
he worked at the Ethiopian king’s will answer this question. Besides, the penetration of the varnish into the coloured
court for a solid forty years. The layer may make it difficult to identify the binder. Since the backs of the panels are
study of this icon permits one to not varnished, a sample was taken from the coloured layer of the left panel to
distinguish what came from his determine the nature of the binder.
Italian training and what came 3
from his acculturation to Ethiopia. 4
6 7
1 5
Addis 8
Paris
x S03 x S10
The mineral analysis
The work of observation has allowed us to identify the different constituent Different samples were taken, depending
materials and to select those which it is interesting to sample for scientific on the aim envisaged:
analysis in the laboratory. However, we have to be sure to sample the original - The first sample reveals the stratigraphy of
material. For that, the paint must first of all be examined under UV to locate the work from the varnish to the wood in
possible areas of repainting and therefore not to sample the restoration order to identify the different layers and
materials. their thickness. The cross-section of the
strata (sample S03) enables one to
understand the general structure of the
x S03
x S14 work.
- A series of samples will be done to identify
the organic materials: the nature of the
varnish (S08, 10), the binding agent on the
x S10
back and front (S16) and the dye.
- Another series of samples is done to
x S04 analyze the inorganic materials, primarily
the pigments which are most often minerals:
x S13 o S01: to identify the red pigment;
o S02: to identify the orange pigment;
x S08 o S04: to identify the blue pigment;
o S10: to identify the black and deep red
x S02 pigments;
o S11: to identify the red pigment of the
x S01 Virgin’s cloth and its blue highlights;
x S16 x S11 o S13: to identify the bluish green pigment;
o S14: to identify the colour of the flesh areas.
to Paris
The work of the painter Fere Seyon under the patronage of King Zere Yaqob
The work of Merqoryos - Brancaleon
In the beginning of the 15th century, King Dawit (1379/80-1412) is the
most influential patron. He commissioned the writing, the translation and the
illustration of texts. One of them is the book of the “Miracles of Mary”
translated from Arabic to Geez. This book was destined to be given an
outstanding place in the Ethiopian liturgy. To the original corpus of miracles, a
number of local events which involved Ethiopian kings and nobles were added
1
in the course of time. In the first copy of this collection, kept in Amba Geshen,
Dawit had himself represented in prayer in front of the Virgin. Exceptionally, in this manuscript, Mary’s name and
nimbo are highlighted with gold (1).
King Zere Yaqob (1434-1468) inherited from his father, Dawit, his devotion to Mary as intercessor between
God and people. Zere Yaqob composed a large number of homilies in which he defined the creed and practice of
the Ethiopian Church.
In the 15th century therefore, the new religious policy and the
multiplication of feasts in honour of Mary necessitated the production of many
icons. Only one of the painters at the service of Zere Yaqob is known by name
because he signed of his works, a large icon (1.77 meter high) kept at the
monastery of Daga Estifanos on Lake Tana (2). It reads : [ዛ]ቲ፡ ሥዕል፡ ተገብረ[ት፡]
በመዋእሊሁ፡ (ለ)ንጉሥነ፡ ዘርአ፡ ያዕቆብ፡፡ ወአበ፡ ምኔትነ፡ ይስሐቅ፡ ዘዳጋ፡ ወሠአሊ[ሃ]፡
ፍሬ፡ ጽዮን፡ ነዳይ[፡ ወኃ]ጥእ፡ ዘደብረ፡ ጕጕቤን፡፡ ዝክሩኒ፡ በጸሎ[ት]ክ[ሙ፡] ደቂቀ፡ [ዛቲ፡
መ]ካን፡ ለዓለም፡ ወዓለም፡ አሜን፡ ወአሜን፡፡ “This painting has been done during
the days of King Zere Yaqob and of our abbot Yeshaq of Daga. I am the painter,
Fere Seyon, poor sinner from Debre Gwegweben. Remember me in your
prayers, you children of this place, forever and ever, amen, amen.”
This inscription is exceptional because of the information it provides: the
time, the patronage, the destination of the work, the painter’s identity and
2 monastic origin.
Fere Seyon was not the only painter to have worked in such
circumstances. Nevertheless he did contribute to develop a distinct style which
influenced the Marian pictures of the second half of the 15th century. The flesh
tones are painted in flat tints, faces are oval, noses and brows are drawn with
one continuous line. Drapes result from the juxtaposition of hues of the same
colour suggesting the folds. There are no ornamental patterns (3). 3
In the 15th century’s second half, Italian craftsmen, among whom painters, came to work at the court at the
request of Ethiopian kings. Only the work of Venetian Nicolo Brancaleon is identified. He signed his paintings
either with this Italian name or with his Ethiopian name, Merqoryos. He reached Ethiopia in the 1480’s and
worked at the court particularly Lebne Dengel’s (1508-1526) who entrusted him with the decoration of royal
churches. Later on, Ethiopian painters such as a certain Afnin painted in the same style called Italianate. This style
is characterized by the somewhat naturalistic rendering of the human bodies.
Their shapes are slightly plump and the flesh tones more realistic in style.
Brancaleon highlights the folds of the drapes in black and sometimes in yellow.
The veil of the Virgin is transparent. Angels who flank Mary are rendered in an
Italian style. Flowers and stars adorn the clothes. Like in the paintings from Fere
Seyon’s circle, the backgrounds are also painted with plain colours but the
4 painter often draws a piece of furniture on them (4).
The History
17th and 18th century development of painting in the royal capital
The First and Second Gonder Schools
In the second half of the 16th century, the centre of the Christian kingdom
moved westwards into the Lake Tana region. This new geopolitical
configuration was consolidated during the 17th century by the setting up of a
new capital at Gonder, some 60 km northwards, and the building of royal
residences on the eastern and southern shores of the lake, in the regions of
Begemder and Gojjam, where the 17th and 18th centuries monarchs spent time.
In 1636-1637, King Fasiledes established himself in Gonder, where he built
a palace and churches in stone and lime mortar. Under his successors, city
development continued and each sovereign added his own structures. Some
civilian buildings used to display murals both outside and inside, as
documented by texts and some rare traces depicting animal and geometric
patterns on the walls of King Susenyos’ residence of Denqez.
Kings, nobles and Church dignitaries commissioned murals for the
churches, which at that time were regularly built on a circular plan, as well as
new cycles of illuminations in manuscripts. A new artistic form developed,
rooted in 15th century art and renewed through the inspiration brought about
by Western engravings, which provoked the rulers’ enthusiasm.
By reference to the capital city and assuming that it was the centre of the
art production, this new form of art was called “Gondarine.” Developed over a
period of two centuries, Gonder art comprises two successive phases clearly
distinguished by stylistic and iconographic criteria. Features, facial modelling,
the use of colour and decorative patterns dramatically changed from one to the
other.
It is during the last decade of the 17th century, under the reign of Iyasu 1st
(1682-1706), that the changes began which brought about the Second Gonder
style. In development during the 18th century, this style is known for its palette
of lively and varied colours, from the use of yellow, green and red (deep, intense,
saturated red and green) backgrounds, using the technique of graduated
colours, and from a general plumpness, especially in the rendering of the faces,
rounded with a careful distribution of soft shading in brown. The ornamental
patterns, borrowing from floral motifs, are more exuberant. The blue cape of
Mary suggests a patterned cut-velvet fabric (2). Light and shade were
introduced, as well as the use of graduated colours. In the background, a bright
yellow colour is juxtaposed with dark red and green, while colours blend in the
2 adjacent areas, creating the effect of softness and luminosity.
In the 18th century, the illustrated themes multiply. For example, the
miracle of the Apparition of the Virgin Mary at Debre Metmaq, told in the
“Miracles of Mary” and the “Synaxary,” is depicted.
of Painting
Techniques and colour effects
Ground layer
Through the lacunae of the coloured layer, we can see the white
ground layer (1), made of calcium sulphate. This ground layer was applied
directly onto wood. Not only was it applied onto the face of the board but
also onto its sides and back, which indicates a careful preparation of the
whole object.
Observing
Inscriptions
ጴጥሮስ፡ ወጳውሎስ፡ ‘’Peter and Paul’’ ያዕቆብ፡ ወዮሐንስ፡ ‘’Jack and John’’
The red inscriptions on the frame, as well on the painting itself, are the oldest. They give the name of each person
represented. The writing is typical of the 15th century. Therefore, it is contemporary with the elaboration of the painting.
In black on the frame of Under Saint George’s horse, in the
the left panel, the second bottom right, the third inscription, also
inscription is very incomplete. written in black, is a late legal act ordering
It is a deed of property or a the occupation of a certain territory by an
donation. According to the army.
writing, it may date back to
the 17th or 18th century.
The wooden board was hollowed Holes were pierced in the frame in
out, the reserved edges being the frame. order to have a cord pass through,
The edges were carved and painted with binding the two panels together and
an imitation of inlaid gems. allowing opening or closing of the
The two panels were pierced in the
diptych.
corners in order to hang the icon.
After having finished the painting of the veil and the nimbus of the Virgin,
the painter decided to add a crown around the head of the Virgin, but he did not
complete his task. This crown is drawn with a double light red and black line but
is not painted. The line passes over the veil of the Virgin, over her nimbus and
even over the wings of the archangels. Thus, the painter changed his mind twice:
a first time while wishing to transform the aureoled Virgin into a crowned
Virgin, a second time when he discontinued the drawing. The examination with
UV rays confirms that the drawing of the crown is of the same period as the rest
of the icon.
The theme of the crowned Virgin, Queen of Heaven, appears discretely in
Ethiopia in the 15th century. It will develop during the 18th century.
This is an example of Crowned Virgin painted in the same period of time.
(icon of the IES collection, IESMus n°4117).
an Icon
Layers upon layers, the evolution of an icon through time
Ethiopian icons have long and complex histories. A number of It is difficult then to tell in what order the following
paintings, as we see them today, are made of different layers developments took place. The damaged painting has been
accumulated on top of one another throughout the centuries. The retouched in different ways and at different times:
colours are refreshed or even changed, contours are drawn again, - At a given time, the caption naming the subject-matter of the
pieces of cloth are patched over older layers of paint, inscriptions painting (se‘ela qeddus giyorgis, "Image of Saint George") was
are either added, erased or hidden. Through this process, the life covered by a new paint layer.
of an icon may be prolonged. - In certain areas, the superimposition of several colours indicates
The icon of Saint George, a triptych signed by an Italian painter that the original colour was replaced.
living in Ethiopia, Brancaleon, is a perfect example of the different - A varnish layer was then applied over the whole icon, and
phases an icon can undergo through time. On the central panel, particularly over the two previous coloured layers. It is therefore
Saint George is killing the dragon while the lateral panels show his not original. Nevertheless, it was not applied over the repainted
martyrdom. areas, whether on lacunae or cloth.
By analysing this painting, we come across the major retouching It is after varnishing that the icon was retouched in the three
methods: repaints within lacunae (see the explanatory cleared following ways, possibly at different times:
areas), repaints on cloth patched onto the icon (white dashed - Lacunae were painted over.
outlines) and contours drawn again on the coloured layers (white - Pieces of cloth were patched up in order to repair certain
outlines). Both by microscoping the stratigraphy of the icon and damaged areas. Saint George's head was repainted on cloth during
looking at it through UV rays enable one to complement the the 17th century.
naked-eye observation of the techniques used and the information - In some cases, fresher outlines in red and black were redrawn
provided by stylistic and palaeographical studies. Although it is over the varnish layer.
difficult to draw up a complete chronology of the different
retouchings, we are able to discern the following sequence: Generations of wear and retouching and subsequent wear all
The icon was painted by a painter named Merqoryos, i.e. may be part of the icon's meaning and aesthetic. Although most
Brancaleon, active between the years 1480 and 1520. He wrote his repainted areas have been treated rather roughly, the overall
name under the rear hooves of Saint George’s horse. All the impression is that the icon has preserved its integrity.
captions (yellow outlines) have been written by Brancaleon at the
same time.
Archaeology
Retouching the outlines
Hidden
inscription
Repainting on cloth
Repainting over lacunae
This icon was originally directly painted on a white - On the edge of Saint Kiros' nimbo, one may see the naked cloth,
ground layer made of calcium sulphate (or gesso). stripped of paint.
The icon has been restored several times century - A larger piece of cloth is patched between Saint Ewotastewos and
after century. During one of these operations, pieces Saint Kiros. Saint Ewotastewos' mantle was originally green (as we see
of cloth were patched directly onto the wood in order on the left) whereas the restorer painted it blue (on the right).
to hide some damage. The elements which had - The most impressive patch is the one that covers an area which
disappeared have been repainted on the cloth suffered a lot of damage and where a new head was painted for Saint
without a ground layer. George. The red mask, which renders the shades of the face, is
There are five such cloth patches on the icon (their characteristic of the First Gonder Style which developed during the 17th
locations are indicated by the white dashed outlines): century. The original painting is likely to have been completely erased
- Two small strips are located on the top left and top when the cloth was glued. Therefore, nobody will ever know what the
right of the painting. They may hide the captions of original face of the saint looked like.
the two matching scenes which happen to be the only - These restorations are very weathered.
scenes without captions.
of an Icon
The life of an icon: Uses and re-uses
From the moment when they were commissioned, icons have crossed the centuries and survived for generations: people who
commissioned them, those who prepared the boards, hollowing the frames, those who painted them, those who contemplated them in
prayer, those who bequeathed and inherited them… These people, whether anonymous or not, have left traces on the icons. They had
their names, or prayers, even deeds of ownership, written on them.
The icons have been incensed at church, illuminated with wax tapers and melted wax occasionally smeared them. In their making or
maintenance, elements of older objects may have been incorporated. And so, the icon does not witness to the time of their creation only
but also of all the ages they have crossed right up to the present.
The donors
By and large, donors remain anonymous. Sometimes, inscriptions on the icon itself
offer clues even if they do not provide complete information about the painter, the donor,
the owner, the occasion for which it was made...
For example, the inscription on the top right of the icon IESMus n°3789 (down left
picture) reads:
ዝንቱ፡ ሥዕል፡ ዘፍቁረ፡ ድንግል፡ ዘአጥረዮ፡ በንዋዩ፡
‘’This icon belongs to Fequra-Dengel; he has acquired it with his ressources.’’
Although Fequra-Dengel is the owner of the icon, the inscription does not tell whether
it is he who ordered it. It seems to have been written by the same hand as the captions. We
can therefore expect they may belong to the same period of time. He paid for it either in
kind or with a monetary equivalent like salt-bars. Did he acquire it for his home or in order
to present it to a church as a token of his involvement in the community?
During the course of the 18th
century, donors are more and more
represented, whether lying down
or standing up, arms crossed over
their chest in a posture denoting
humility and prayer (IESMus
n°3524, on the top).
On the back of the icon IESMus n°3789, a drawing was incised in the wood. It depicts the Virgin
with the Child, flanked by the archangels Michael and Gabriel, whose wings form a canopy above the
Virgin.
In its original condition, the panel was larger by a few centimetres. As a matter of fact, one letter
belonging to the name of each archangel has been severed as were their feet. Furthermore, a
fragmentary pattern which may have been an angle ornament remains on the top left corner.
From its proportions, we can deduce that it may originally have been a side panel of a mediaeval
altar (’’menbere tabot’’), as found in Lalibala for example. Damaged, the altar may not be utilised any
longer and, therefore, the boards could be used for another religious purpose.
The Life of
The re-appropriations of the object
The three inscriptions written on icon IESMus n°3980 tell of three different moments in the history of the icon.
The first inscriptions (in red) name the individuals represented in the painting and are contemporary with its elaboration.
The second inscription, in black on the frame of the left-hand panel is very incomplete and one of the fragments of text that we
can read says: ወሰበኩ፡ ዘንተ፡ ሥዕለ፡ ለ…. ‘’And they made this image of...’’, making allusion to the history of the making of the
image. The text ends with a formula of excommunication and indicates anyway a physical or symbolic re-appropriation of the
object by someone or a community of thos epoch.
The third inscription, also black but much later, is of totally different nature. ወሰራአነ፡ አዲ፡ ከመ፡ ይኩን፡ ሃራ፡ ምድረ፡ ወዳድ፡ ዘሃሎ፡
በገጠባ፡ ወለጕና፡ ወከመ ኢይግብኡ፡ ስዩማነ፡ ምድር፡ አውገዝነ፡ ‘’Again, we have established an army on the territory of Wadād which is
found at Gatabā and Lagwenā and, so that the chiefs of the territory do not enter there, we have threatened with
excommunication.’’
Inside the churches, paintings are leaning against the walls, whether laid on the
floor or sitting on a bed (’’alga’’). With the murals, they contribute to the visual
atmosphere which pervades the church. Certain icons, pierced with holes, must have
been hung after the wall of the church or of another building in the church
compound (right picture, IESMus n°3980).
In fact, the ‘’Life of SaintMerha-Krestos’’, a 15th century abbot of the monastery
of Debre Libanos, alludes to an icon of the Virgin that was hung on the door of the
construction were the Eucharistic bread and wine are prepared (’’biete-lehem’’).
During Mass when the church is open, the faitful may come and prostate before
images, place a candle there or an offering of incense. On that occasion or during the
processions, tears of candle grease sometimes fall on the objects (here on the icon
IESMus n°3980).
an Icon
This journal summarizes the panels presented in the exhibition held
at the Institute of Ethiopian Studies (IES, Addis Ababa). The whole results of
the analysis done by the C2RMF (Centre de recherche et de restauration des
musées de France – Centre for Research and Restoration of the French
Museums) will be published in a specific book. The analysed icons are the
following: IESMus 3980, 4053, 10249, 4191, 4325, 3789, 5093, 7071, 4126, 7132,
4232, 6793, 6967, 3524, 4144, 4494.
Selective bibliography
‘’African Zion, the sacred art of Ethiopia’’, 1993, catalogue of the exhibition,
Roderick GRIERSON ed., Catalogue by Marilyn HELDMAN with Stuart C.
MUNRO-HAY, New Haven – London, Yale University Press.
HELDMAN Marilyn E., 1994: ‘’The Marian icons of the painter Fre Seyon. A
Study in Fifteenth Century Ethiopian Art’’, Patronage and Spirituality,
Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz.
Photo credits
© Méliné Miguirditchian
© Marilyn Heldman
© Michael Gervers - Mäzgäbä Səəlat – Treasury of Ethiopian Images
FONDATION CARNOT
AGENCE NATIONALE DE LA RECHERCHE