You are on page 1of 18

Project:

Project no:
Author:

Project data
Project name
Project number
Author
Description
Date 04-Nov-23
Design code EN

Material
Steel S 355, S 235
Concrete C25/30

1 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Project item Center tube connection

Design
Name Center tube connection
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading

Beams and columns


β – Direction γ - Pitch α - Rotation Offset ex Offset ey Offset ez
Name Cross-section Forces in
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm]
M1 10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
M2 10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) 180.0 30.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
M3 10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) 90.0 30.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
M4 10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) -90.0 30.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
M5 10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) 140.0 30.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node
M6 10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) -140.0 30.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node

2 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

3 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Cross-sections
Name Material
10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) S 235

Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing

10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) S 235

Load effects (equilibrium not required)


N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 M1 -0.2 0.0 -0.1 0.0 1.0 0.0
M3 -0.2 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0
M4 -0.2 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0
M5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
M6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0

4 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Check

Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.0 < 5.0% OK
Welds 25.2 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated

Plates
Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
M1-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 54.5 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 77.6 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-w 1 2.5 LE1 88.1 0.0 0.0 OK
M1-w 2 2.5 LE1 88.0 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 45.9 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 83.0 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-w 1 2.5 LE1 80.4 0.0 0.0 OK
M2-w 2 2.5 LE1 80.4 0.0 0.0 OK
M3-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 46.6 0.0 0.0 OK
M3-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 19.6 0.0 0.0 OK
M3-w 1 2.5 LE1 44.9 0.0 0.0 OK
M3-w 2 2.5 LE1 75.3 0.0 0.0 OK
M4-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 46.7 0.0 0.0 OK
M4-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 19.6 0.0 0.0 OK
M4-w 1 2.5 LE1 75.2 0.0 0.0 OK
M4-w 2 2.5 LE1 45.2 0.0 0.0 OK
M5-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 39.1 0.0 0.0 OK
M5-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 14.3 0.0 0.0 OK
M5-w 1 2.5 LE1 25.5 0.0 0.0 OK
M5-w 2 2.5 LE1 48.5 0.0 0.0 OK
M6-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 38.8 0.0 0.0 OK
M6-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 14.8 0.0 0.0 OK
M6-w 1 2.5 LE1 48.4 0.0 0.0 OK
M6-w 2 2.5 LE1 25.4 0.0 0.0 OK

Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 235 235.0 5.0

5 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Overall check, LE1

Strain check, LE1

6 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Equivalent stress, LE1

7 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Welds (Plastic redistribution)


Throat th. Length σw,Ed εPl σ⏊ τ|| τ⏊ Ut Utc
Item Edge Loads Status
[mm] [mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa] [%] [%]
M1-tfl 1 M2-tfl 1 2.5 50 LE1 OK
M1-bfl 1 M2-bfl 1 2.5 50 LE1 OK
M1-w 1 M2-w 2 2.5 98 LE1 OK
M1-w 2 M2-w 1 2.5 98 LE1 OK
M2-w 1 M3-tfl 1 ◢3.0 11 LE1 48.5 0.0 22.5 16.0 19.0 13.5 13.5 OK
M2-w 1 M3-w 2 ◢3.0 109 LE1 90.7 0.0 -41.9 -13.3 44.5 25.2 5.5 OK
M1-w 2 M3-tfl 1 ◢3.0 36 LE1 79.3 0.0 34.4 27.8 -30.5 22.0 8.8 OK
M1-w 2 M3-w 1 ◢3.0 88 LE1 43.9 0.0 -23.0 -1.8 -21.6 12.2 4.9 OK
M1-w 1 M4-tfl 1 ◢3.0 36 LE1 79.7 0.0 34.5 -28.2 -30.4 22.2 8.9 OK
M1-w 1 M4-w 2 ◢2.0 88 LE1 66.3 0.0 -33.6 3.3 32.9 18.4 7.4 OK
M2-w 2 M4-tfl 1 ◢3.0 11 LE1 48.5 0.0 22.5 -16.0 19.0 13.5 13.5 OK
M2-w 2 M4-w 1 ◢3.0 109 LE1 90.8 0.0 -41.9 13.3 -44.5 25.2 5.5 OK
M2-w 2 M6-tfl 1 ◢3.0 36 LE1 24.6 0.0 14.9 4.2 10.5 6.8 5.2 OK
M2-w 2 M6-w 1 ◢3.0 109 LE1 46.6 0.0 -17.7 -0.4 -24.9 12.9 3.1 OK
M4-w 1 M6-tfl 1 ◢3.0 23 LE1 34.8 0.0 17.5 10.6 13.8 9.7 8.1 OK
M4-w 1 M6-w 2 ◢3.0 109 LE1 19.9 0.0 2.2 4.5 10.5 5.5 2.4 OK
M2-w 1 M5-tfl 1 ◢3.0 36 LE1 24.5 0.0 14.9 -4.1 10.4 6.8 5.2 OK
M2-w 1 M5-w 2 ◢3.0 109 LE1 46.6 0.0 -17.7 0.4 24.9 13.0 3.1 OK
M3-w 2 M5-tfl 1 ◢3.0 23 LE1 34.7 0.0 17.4 -10.6 13.7 9.6 8.1 OK
M3-w 2 M5-w 1 ◢3.0 109 LE1 19.8 0.0 2.3 -4.5 -10.4 5.5 2.4 OK

Design data

βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 235 0.80 360.0 259.2

Detailed result for M1-tfl 1 M2-tfl 1

Butt welds are assumed as full penetration and are not checked. Their resistance is assumed the same as that of the welded
member -EN 1993 - 1 - 8 - 4.7.1.

Detailed result for M1-bfl 1 M2-bfl 1

Butt welds are assumed as full penetration and are not checked. Their resistance is assumed the same as that of the welded
member -EN 1993 - 1 - 8 - 4.7.1.

Detailed result for M1-w 1 M2-w 2

Butt welds are assumed as full penetration and are not checked. Their resistance is assumed the same as that of the welded
member -EN 1993 - 1 - 8 - 4.7.1.

Detailed result for M1-w 2 M2-w 1

Butt welds are assumed as full penetration and are not checked. Their resistance is assumed the same as that of the welded
member -EN 1993 - 1 - 8 - 4.7.1.

8 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Detailed result for M2-w 1 M3-tfl 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
48.5 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

22.5 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 13.5 %

Detailed result for M2-w 1 M3-w 2


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
90.7 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

41.9 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 25.2 %

9 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Detailed result for M1-w 2 M3-tfl 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
79.3 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

34.4 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 22.0 %

Detailed result for M1-w 2 M3-w 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
43.9 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

23.0 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 12.2 %

10 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Detailed result for M1-w 1 M4-tfl 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
79.7 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

34.5 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 22.2 %

Detailed result for M1-w 1 M4-w 2


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
66.3 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

33.6 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 18.4 %

11 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Detailed result for M2-w 2 M4-tfl 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
48.5 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

22.5 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 13.5 %

Detailed result for M2-w 2 M4-w 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
90.8 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

41.9 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 25.2 %

12 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Detailed result for M2-w 2 M6-tfl 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
24.6 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

14.9 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 6.8 %

Detailed result for M2-w 2 M6-w 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
46.6 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

17.7 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 12.9 %

13 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Detailed result for M4-w 1 M6-tfl 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
34.8 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

17.5 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 9.7 %

Detailed result for M4-w 1 M6-w 2


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
19.9 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

2.2 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 5.5 %

14 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Detailed result for M2-w 1 M5-tfl 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
24.5 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

14.9 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 6.8 %

Detailed result for M2-w 1 M5-w 2


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
46.6 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

17.7 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 13.0 %

15 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Detailed result for M3-w 2 M5-tfl 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
34.7 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

17.4 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 9.6 %

Detailed result for M3-w 2 M5-w 1


Weld resistance check (EN 1993-1-8 4.5.3.2)

σw,Rd = fu /(βw γM 2 ) = 2 + 3(τ 2 + τ 2 )]0.5 =


σw,Ed = [σ⊥
​ ​ ​ ​
360.0 MPa ≥ ​


∥ ​ ​
19.8 MPa

σ⊥,Rd = 0.9fu /γM 2 =


​ ​ ​
259.2 MPa ≥ ∣σ⊥ ∣ =

2.3 MPa

where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength

βw = 0.80
​ – appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1

γM 2 = 1.25 ​ – Safety factor

Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed

w,Rd
; ​


σ⊥,Rd


​ )= 5.5 %

Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.

16 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Bill of material

Manufacturing operations
Plates Welds Length
Name Shape Nr. Bolts Nr.
[mm] [mm] [mm]
CUT1 Butt: a = 2.5 296.7
Fillet: a = 3.0 11.3
CUT2
Fillet: a = 3.0 109.0
CUT3 Fillet: a = 3.0 124.1
Fillet: a = 3.0 36.2
CUT4
Fillet: a = 2.0 87.9
CUT5 Fillet: a = 3.0 120.3
CUT6 Fillet: a = 3.0 145.5
Fillet: a = 3.0 23.1
CUT7
Fillet: a = 3.0 109.4
Fillet: a = 3.0 36.1
CUT8
Fillet: a = 3.0 109.4
CUT9 Fillet: a = 3.0 132.4

Welds
Throat thickness Leg size Length
Type Material
[mm] [mm] [mm]
Butt S 235 - - 296.7
Fillet S 235 3.0 4.2 629.0
Fillet S 235 3.0 4.2 327.8
Fillet S 235 2.0 2.8 87.9

Symbol explanation
Symbol Symbol explanation
εPl Strain
σEd Eq. stress
fy Yield strength
εlim Limit of plastic strain
σw,Ed Equivalent stress
σw,Rd Equivalent stress resistance
σ⏊ Perpendicular stress
τ|| Shear stress parallel to weld axis
τ⏊ Shear stress perpendicular to weld axis
0.9 σw,Rd Perpendicular stress resistance - 0.9*fu/γM2
βw Corelation factor EN 1993-1-8 tab. 4.1
Ut Utilization
Utc Weld capacity utilization

Code settings

17 / 18
Project:
Project no:
Author:

Item Value Unit Reference


γM0 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM1 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM2 1.25 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM3 1.25 - EN 1993-1-8: 2.2
γC 1.50 - EN 1992-1-1: 2.4.2.4
γInst 1.20 - EN 1992-4: Table 4.1
Joint coefficient βj 0.67 - EN 1993-1-8: 6.2.5
Effective area - influence of mesh size 0.10 -
Friction coefficient - concrete 0.25 - EN 1993-1-8
Friction coefficient in slip-resistance 0.30 - EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.7
Limit plastic strain 0.05 - EN 1993-1-5
Weld stress evaluation Plastic redistribution
Detailing No
Distance between bolts [d] 2.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Distance between bolts and edge [d] 1.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Concrete breakout resistance check Both EN 1992-4: 7.2.1.4 and 7.2.2.5
Use calculated αb in bearing check. Yes EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.4
Cracked concrete Yes EN 1992-4
Local deformation check No CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Local deformation limit 0.03 - CIDECT DG 1, 3 - 1.1
Geometrical nonlinearity (GMNA) Yes Analysis with large deformations for hollow section joints
Braced system No EN 1993-1-8: 5.2.2.5

18 / 18

You might also like