Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Siddharth Misra
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering,
College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, TX, United States;
Department of Geology and Geophysics, College of Geoscience,
Texas A&M University, TX, United States
Yifu Han
Schlumberger Beijing Geoscience Center, Beijing, China
Yuteng Jin
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering,
Texas A&M University, TX, United States
Pratiksha Tathed
Petrophysicist at BP, Houston, TX, United States
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage
and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to
seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright
Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by
the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional
practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described
herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety
and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or
editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter
of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods,
products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-821439-8
The ideas, concepts, and formulations developed in this book can be applied to
several disciplines requiring material/process characterization, such as colloid
and interfacial sciences, bioscience, electrochemistry, geophysics, water re-
sources, geothermal resources, fossil energy resources, and mining exploration.
Multifrequency electromagnetic (EM) sensing and its interpretation is a crucial
tool to characterize the subsurface and materials. Characterization of materials
enables efficient and effective engineering of systems and processes. Multifre-
quency laboratory measurement of a dispersive EM property, such as electrical
conductivity, dielectric permittivity, or magnetic permeability, is commonly
analyzed for purposes of material characterization. Such an analysis requires
inversion of the multifrequency measurement based on a forward mechanistic/
empirical model. In doing so, the estimated parameters of the model serve as
characteristics/identifiers of the material.
Chapters 1 provides a comprehensive review of current practices in multi-
frequency EM data acquisition and interpretation in the laboratory and in the
subsurface. The chapter also provides information about various interpretation
models and workflows for geological characterization and formation evaluation.
The chapter presents the use of various EM logging tools for subsurface
multifrequency EM data acquisition. Several case studies of subsurface EM log
acquisition and interpretation are elaborated and analyzed in the chapter.
Different EM log-interpretation workflows are discussed for various formations,
including conventional sandstone, shaly-sand, carbonate, turbidities, and un-
conventional formations. At the end, Chapter 1 discusses the integration of EM
measurements with other physical measurements, such as nuclear magnetic
resonance and formation testing measurements, for purposes of reducing the
uncertainties in estimation and to estimate new formation properties that can
only be computed using joint-interpretation methods.
Chapters 2 provides a brief review of mechanistic and empirical models used
for multifrequency EM data interpretation. Chapter 2 first describes popular
empirical models that are used for the interpretation of resistivity measurements
acquired in the laboratory and subsurface environments. Next, the chapter pro-
vides information about various multifrequency mechanistic models that can be
used for the interpretation of high-frequency conductivity and permittivity
frequency-based measurements. Following that, several mechanistic models
xvii
xviii Preface
faster than MCMC-based inversion. The parameters are relatively easy to tune in
PSO method.
In summary, a detailed knowledge of reservoir rock properties is crucial for
efficient hydrocarbon production, geothermal resource development, and carbon
geo-sequestration, to name a few. Geoscientists and petrophysicists have
developed a variety of reservoir characterization techniques, such as seismic
surveys, well logging, and core analysis, to evaluate the storage potential,
resource potential, and producibility of subsurface reservoirs. Currently, a vast
majority of exploration and production activities are in geologically complex
reservoirs, such as shaly-sands, sand-shale laminations, igneous rocks, and
organic-rich mudrocks. New reservoir characterization techniques are required
to accurately estimate the reservoir properties.
Existing interpretation methods for subsurface EM measurements in for-
mations containing dispersed and/or laminated clay minerals, clay-sized grains,
and conductive minerals rely on empirical models and lack reliable mechanistic
models. Electrical conductivity anisotropy, dielectric permittivity anisotropy,
and interfacial polarization of these formations significantly influence the EM
measurements. Hence, the accuracy of estimation of petrophysical properties
based on conventional resistivity interpretation of the EM measurements is
generally improved by correlating the subsurface measurements with laboratory
measurements on core plugs. Subsurface EM measurements in shaly-sands,
sand-shale laminations, and organic-rich mudrocks, to name a few examples,
exhibit directional and frequency dispersive characteristics primarily due to the
effects of electrical conductivity anisotropy, dielectric permittivity anisotropy,
and interfacial polarization phenomena. Conventional resistivity interpretation
or high-frequency permittivity interpretation techniques for laboratory and
subsurface EM measurements do not account for the frequency-dependent ef-
fects of interfacial polarization phenomena. Consequently, the mechanistic
models, inversion-based multifrequency EM data interpretation techniques, and
subsurface data-processing workflows proposed in this book will be crucial for
improved subsurface characterization using multifrequency EM data.
Siddharth Misra
Texas, United States
04/02/2021
Acknowledgments
xxiii
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Confession of Agnes Sympson to King
James.
“Item.—Fyled and convict for samecle, as she confest before his
Majesty that the devil in man’s likeness met her going out in the
fields, from her own house a Keith, betwixt five and six at even, being
alone, and commendit her to be at Northborrick Kirk the next night.
And she passed then on horseback, conveyed by her good-son called
John Cooper, and lighted at the Kirk-yard, or a little before she came
to it, about eleven hours at even. They danced along the Kirk-yard,
Geilie Duncan plaid to them on a trump, John Fien, mussiled, led all
the rest; the said Agnes and her daughter followed next. Besides
there were Kate Grey, George Moile’s wife, Robert Guerson,
Catherine Duncan Buchanan, Thomas Barnhill and his wife, Gilbert
Macgil, John Macgil, Catherine Macgil, with the rest of their
complices, above an hundred persons, whereof there were six men,
and all the rest women. The women made first their homage and
then the men. The men were turned nine times Widdershins about,
and the women six times. John Fien blew up the doors and in the
lights, which were like mickle black candles sticking round about the
pulpit. The devil started up himself in the pulpit, like a mickle black
man, and every one answered here. Mr. Robert Guerson being
named, they all ran hirdie girdie, and were angry; for it was promised
he should be called Robert the Comptroller, alias Rob the Rowar, for
expriming of his name. The first thing he demandit was, as they kept
all promise, and been good servants, and what they had done since
the last time they convened. At his command they opened up three
graves, two within, and one without the Kirk, and took off the joints
of their fingers, toes, and neise, and parted them amongst them: and
the said Agnes Sympson got for her part a winding-sheet and two
joints. The devil commandit them to keep the joints upon them while
they were dry, and then to make a powder of them to do evil withal.
Then he commandit them to keep his commandments, which were to
do all the evil they could. Before they departed they kissed his breech
[the record speaks more broad.] He [meaning the devil] had on him
ane gown and ane hat, which were both black: and they that were
assembled, part stood and part sate: John Fien was ever nearest the
devil, at his left elbock; Graymarcal keeped the door.”
The Scotch accent has been here retained for the better
authenticity of the matter; the confession here given being, in all
probability, a principal reason why King James changed his opinion
relative to the existence of witches; which, it was reported, he was
inclined to think were mere conceits; as he was then but young (not
above five or six and twenty years of age) when this examination took
place before him; and part of the third chapter of his Demonologie
appears to be a transcript of this very confession.
Agnes Sympson was remarkable for her skill in diseases, and
frequently, it is said, took the pains and sickness of the afflicted upon
herself to relieve them, and afterwards translated them to a third
person: she made use of long Scriptural rhymes and prayers,
containing the principal points of Christianity, so that she seemed
not so much a white witch as a holy woman. She also used
nonsensical rhymes in the instruction of ignorant people, and taught
them to say the white and black Pater-noster in metre, in set forms,
to be used morning and evening; and at other times, as occasion
might require.
The White Pater-noster runs thus:—
God was my foster,
He fostered me
Under the book of Palm tree.
St. Michael was my dame,
He was born at Bethlehem.
He was made of flesh and blood,
God send me my right food;
My right food, and dyne too,
That I may too yon kirk go,
To read upon yon sweet book,
Which the mighty God of heaven shook.
Open, open, heaven’s yaits,
Steik, steik, hell’s yaits,
All saints be the better,
That hear the white prayer, Pater-noster.
The Black Pater-noster.
Four neuks in this house for holy angels,
A post in the midst, that Christ Jesus,
Lucas, Marcus, Mathew, Joannes,
God be unto this house, and all that belong us.