Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NSCR GCR S03C ZWD LTR Co 000021
NSCR GCR S03C ZWD LTR Co 000021
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant Services
ISMAN WIDODO
Authorized Representative
Joint Venture of PT Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk. and
PT PP (Persero) Tbk.
Jalan Raya Pasar Minggu KM. 18
Jakarta Selatan, 12510, Indonesia
Reference: (1) ADHI – PTPP JV Letter (Ref No. APJV/SCRP03C/2023/XI/T/026) PNR Track
Recovery (BOQ-2) - Engineer’s Instruction No. 01/S03c/202, dated 28
November 2023
The response from the Engineer regarding the titled submission can now be accessed in the DRC
(Encl. 1) pertaining to the subject in question.
GCR Consortium Office: 20th and 21st Floor, Greenfield Tower, Mayflower Street, Greenfield District, Mandaluyong City, 1550
(Main Office) Metro Manila, Philippines
Tel: +63-2-5322-3700
Oriental Consultants Global Unit 38C, 38th Floor, Rufino Pacific Tower Bldg., 6784 Ayala Avenue, Makati City 1223, Philippines
Philippine Branch Office Tel: +63-2-856-9747~9750 | Fax: +63-2-856-9751
North-South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant Services
Sincerely,
for and on behalf of
GCR Consortium
TETSUYA YOSHIZAWA
Engineer’s Delegate
Senior Resident Engineer
Copy furnished:
JEREMY S. REGINO
Undersecretary for Railways, Department of Transportation
CELESTE D. LAUTA
OIC-General Manager, Philippine National Railways
Encl.: 1) S-03c; Review Comments to Proposal PNR Track Recovery (BOQ-2) - Engineer’s Instruction
No. 01/S03c/2023 – Revision D – NONO - [NSCR-GCR-S03C-ZWD-DRC-CO-000004]
GCR Consortium Office: 20th and 21st Floor, Greenfield Tower, Mayflower Street, Greenfield District, Mandaluyong City, 1550
(Main Office) Metro Manila, Philippines
Tel: +63-2-5322-3700
Oriental Consultants Global Unit 38C, 38th Floor, Rufino Pacific Tower Bldg., 6784 Ayala Avenue, Makati City 1223, Philippines
Philippine Branch Office Tel: +63-2-856-9747~9750 | Fax: +63-2-856-9751
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
Method Kindly add Workflow Chart to show work sequence. Please find in the update Proposal of Engineering
1. YW NA Closed DM Yes Instruction No. 01.
Statement
Kindly prepare Site Machinery and Equipment Please find in the updated Proposal of Engineering
Method with Quantities by work sequence by sequence. Instruction No. 01.
2 YW NA Closed DM Yes
Statement
Method Same one of above 2 for manpower is required. Please refer to updated DUPA in the attachment.
3. YW NA Closed DM Yes
Statement
Kindly add detail layout showing loading with crane Please find in the updated Proposal of Engineering
Method and trailer. Instruction No. 01.
4. YW NA Closed DM Yes
Statement
1|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
Sleeper
- Dump Truck
Capacity: 8 Tons
Weight of Sleeper: 200 kg/pcs
Max qty per truck: 40 pcs
- Trailer Truck
Capacity: 25 Tons
Weight of Sleeper: 200 kg/pcs
Max qty per truck: 125 pcs
Security Plan is missing from technical proposal. Yes Please find Site security plan layout in the attachment
PNR Designated Storage Area
In case ROW has issue and there is time gap
Method
7. YW
Statement
between completion of PNR Track Recovery and NA Closed DM
start permanent work.
2|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
Contractor to confirm the selected Subcontractor is Yes According to the Meeting dated 27 Dec 2023, The
"EIGENTECH Corporation" as the most technically Contractor requested to add another subcontractor in
qualified Subcontractor/Suppliers and are capable the proposal.
to execute the works.
Contractor to include in the revise proposal the The selected Subcontractor is Joratech.
9. EA Attachment 5 Technical and Commercial assessment report for N/A Closed BDM
the proposed Subcontractor.
No further comment
Contractor to provide advance copy of DUPA of Yes Noted
Attachment 4
11. EA
DUPA
CP S-03c Main Contract Works for checking of N/A Closed BDM
OCM & Profit % (shall be the same)
3|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
No further comment
Contractor provided insufficient details on the Yes Please refer to updated DUPA in the attachment.
DUPA to review. The Contractor to provide a
correct DUPA on Equipment and to state the
description of equipment like backhoe, crane,
Attachment 4 truck, etc. with quantity on number of units, quantity
13. EA
DUPA
N/A Closed BDM
on number of hours it will be used, and to provide
the unit rate per hour of each equipment.
No further comment
Contractor provided insufficient details on the Yes Please refer to updated DUPA in the attachment.
DUPA to review. The Contractor to provide a
correct DUPA on Materials and to state the
Attachment 4 description of material to be used like drums, empty
14. EA
DUPA sacks, 2" x 4" good lumber, cutting disc, etc. with N/A Closed BDM
quantity, unit, and unit rate of the said materials
No further comment
Contractor to provide substantiation document on Yes Please refer to updated DUPA in the attachment.
Attachment 4 the PHP 154,647.07/no. cost of Steel Drum
15. EA
DUPA Item 5-3
N/A Closed BDM
No further comment
Contractor to provide substantiation document on Yes Please refer to updated DUPA in the attachment.
the PHP 2,227.68/cum Aggregate Sub-base
Attachment 4 Course
16. EA
DUPA Item 15-4
N/A Closed BDM
No further comment
17. EA Attachment 2 BOQ Item No. 9 Recovery of Ballast is not required N/A Closed BDM Yes Noted, Will align to the Addendum No. 05
to recover as per PNR Approval on Letter NSCR-
4|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
No further comment
It was observed a cost of PHP 21,093,726.29 for Yes Contractor put supervision and safety staff only (except
General Requirements (- for Contractor's general requirement from subcontractor) in the update
Mobilization/Demob, Contractor's Project proposal. Other items such as Contractor's
Organization and Management, Traffic Mobilization/Demob, Contractor's Project Organization
Management, Risk Management, Safety and Management, Traffic Management, Risk
Management, Security Plan, Detailed Works Management, Safety Management, Security Plan,
Program, Photographs and Videos, Insurances, Detailed Works Program, Photographs and Videos,
Attachment 4 any other necessary management plans, any type Insurances, any other necessary management plans,
18. EA
DUPA Item 17
N/A Closed BDM
of necessary facilities, any type of environmental any type of necessary facilities, any type of
aspect, any other relevant General Requirements, environmental aspect, any other relevant General
etc.) while there is also a time related and lumpsum Requirements, etc.) will utilize main contract.
cost using the Main Contract Works BOQ Bill 1
items. Kindly clarify and provide substantiation. Please refer to updated DUPA in the attachment.
No further comment
Contractor to provide substantiation of their usage Yes Contractor put supervision and safety staff only (except
of the Main Contract Bill No. 1 time related rates general requirement from subcontractor) in the update
when the bulk of this work is smaller compared to proposal. Other items such as Contractor's
Main Contract. Kindly take note that the Mobilization/Demob, Contractor's Project Organization
Contractor’s proposal is a subcontract work thus and Management, Traffic Management, Risk
shall be supervision only. Example: Management Management, Safety Management, Security Plan,
Attachment 4 and Staff time related charges of PHP Detailed Works Program, Photographs and Videos,
19. EA
DUPA Item 17
N/A Closed BDM
9,210,439.00/month is too high when the number Insurances, any other necessary management plans,
of personnel to supervise this VO will be smaller any type of necessary facilities, any type of
compared to the number of personnel that will work environmental aspect, any other relevant General
on the Main Contract Works. Requirements, etc.) will utilize main contract.
5|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
6|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
No further comment
It was observed that the cost proposal for BOQ Yes Contractor supervision and safety staff only (except
Item 17 General Requirements is 88.88% of the general requirement from subcontractor) in the update
Proposed Direct Cost. It was observed also that it proposal. Other items such as Contractor's
is 1,060.37% greater than the EIGENTECH Mobilization/Demob, Contractor's Project Organization
General Requirements. Kindly clarify and provide and Management, Traffic Management, Risk
substantiation as this is too high and not Management, Safety Management, Security Plan,
Attachment 2 acceptable. Detailed Works Program, Photographs and Videos,
25. EA
Item 17
N/A Closed BDM
Insurances, any other necessary management plans,
any type of necessary facilities, any type of
environmental aspect, any other relevant General
Requirements, etc.) will utilize main contract.
7|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
8|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
9|Page
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
10 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
11 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
Attachment
1.Engineering Added
28 SH Instruction No.1 activities. B Closed RMA
(Attachment-1
Schedule)
12 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
Contractor to elaborate or complete the Yes Please find in the update Proposal of Engineering
description of activity name “Preparation” on Instruction No. 01.
your submitted schedule to avoid confusion.
Attachment 1.
Preparation means all the activity prior to site activity
Engineering
Contractor can clearly state what page or where to such as preparation of approval document, method
31 SH Instruction No.1 B Closed RMA
find the contractor response to engineer’s statement, subcontractor approval, permit and all
(Attachment-1
comment. necessary documents.
Schedule)
Kindly refer to response on item no. 26.
Attachment
1.Engineering
Instruction No.1
32 SH B Closed RMA
(Chapter 3 It was observed that the statement shown above is
Schedule - Page contrasted to submitted PNR Track Recovery
25). Works TOR addendum 04. Kindly refer to my 1st
comment showing the TOR add 4 schedule.
13 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
Noted.
Contractor shall include on your submitted Yes Please find in the update Proposal of Engineering
proposal of EI No. 1 (BOQ-2) the no. of resources Instruction No. 01.
that will be allocated for the whole Track Recovery
Works. Please find it in the attachment 1
In addition to specifying the number of teams Please find the update schedule in the attachment 1 we
assigned to each activity, the contractor is already revised
required to provide the corresponding number/
34 SH General quantity of manpower allocated per activity. B Closed RMA
14 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
Noted.
On Attachment -4 Technical Evaluation - Track Yes Please find the update schedule in the Attachment 1
Relocation-1 under attachment 2 page 56 (Time
Schedule). Please find the update schedule in the attachment 1 we
The subcon (Joratech Corp.) schedule is not already revised
aligned to PNR track recovery TOR add 5. That
was attached on Proposal of Engineering
Instruction No. 01, figure 27, page 39 as shown
below.
Attachment
36 SH A Closed RMA
2/Page 56
15 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes THIS PROJECT HAS A DIFFERENT SITUATION IN
subcontractor in the revised proposal. Contractor to OTHER PACKAGES SINCE THERE ARE MORE
clarify the subcontractor’s OCM of 7.5% while on UNDERGOUND UTILITIES LOCATED IN PACKAGE
Packages S-04 to S-06 a 6.5% only was used. 03C AND WE CANNOT ASSURE THAT THE ROADS
THAT WILL BE USED FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
ARE ALL SAFE. BASED ON OUR EXPERIENCE IN
Attachment 2
38 EA N/A Closed BDM MUNTINLUPA, LGU's REQUIRE US TO PUT
DUPA
PROTECTION FOR ALL MANHOLE COVER FOR ALL
THE ROADS THAT WILL BE PASSED THROUGH.
THIS WILL ALSO APPLY IF THERE ARE BRIDGES
THAT WILL BE DAMAGED DURING OUR
TRANSPORTATION AND OTHER DAMAGES
No further comment
DURING OUR TRACK REMOVAL WORKS.
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes SERVICE DRIVER ON EVERY WORK ITEM WILL BE
subcontractor in the revised proposal. Contractor to UTILIZE ON THE TRANSPORT OF MANPOWER,
clarify the Service Driver on some of the direct work TOOLS & MATERIALS FROM LAYDOWN AREA TO
Attachment 2 items of DUPA. This should be under the General WORK AREA. 3 SERVICE WAS ADDED TO
39 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA Requirements. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
No further comment
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes "ACTUAL ACOOMPLISHEMENT ON S04 IS 4 NOS
subcontractor in the revised proposal. Contractor to PER DAY FOR 1 GROUP, THE PROPOSAL IS 7.5
clarify the low productivity of removal of track rail of NOS PER DAY FOR 2 GROUPS. BREAKDOWN OF
7.5 nos./day with 68 trackmen while on S-05 actual TRACKMAN ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Attachment 2 data it only has 18 trackmen works per day. GROUP 1 (DISMANTLING-20, UNLOADING TO
40 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA 1 TEMPORARY STOCKPILE -10) = 30
GROUP 2 (DISMANTLING -20, UNLOADING TO
TEMPORARY STOCKPILE -10) = 30, CROSSING
No further comment
16 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
No further comment
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes PRICE WAS ADJUSTED ON THE SAID DUPA
subcontractor in the revised proposal. Contractor to (1640.73)
clarify the discrepancy of the rate of Backhoe
Attachment 2 Operator at PHP 1,640.73 (DUPA 1, 2) vs PHP
42 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA 1,691.17 (DUPA 15-1 to 15-4, 16)
No further comment
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes NO VALUE ON THE ESTIMATE (ALREADY
subcontractor in the revised proposal. Contractor to DELETED)
clarify the discrepancy of the rate of Crane
Attachment 2 Operator at PHP 2,011.91 (DUPA 3-3 to 3-6) vs
43 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA PHP 2,041.07 (DUPA 4-5 to 4-6)
No further comment
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes PRICE WAS ADJUSTED ON THE SAID DUPA
subcontractor in the revised proposal. Contractor to (1055.48)
clarify the discrepancy of the rate of Small Machine
Attachment 2 Operator at PHP 1,457.91 (DUPA 15-1) vs PHP
44 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA 1,055.48 (DUPA 15-4)
No further comment
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes (20,675) IS FOR PURCHASE PRICE WHILE (747.50)
subcontractor in the revised proposal. Contractor to IS THE RENTAL PRICE
clarify the discrepancy of the rate of Grinder 7” at
Attachment 2 PHP 20,675 (DUPA 1) vs PHP 747.50 (DUPA 15-
45 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA 5)
No further comment
17 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
No further comment
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes (85,000) IS FOR THE PURCHASE PRICE WHILE
subcontractor in the revised proposal. Contractor to (6,450) IS THE RENTAL PRICE
clarify the discrepancy of the rate of Rail Spreader
Attachment 2 Beam with Rail Clamps at PHP 85,000 (DUPA 3-3)
47 EA vs PHP 6,450 (DUPA 3-4 to 3-6, 4-5, 4-6, 15-1 to N/A Closed BDM
DUPA
15-5)
No further comment
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes PRICE WAS ADJUSTED BASED ON THE UNIT RATE
subcontractor in the revised proposal. The rates on THAT WAS UTILIZED ON S04. TOOLS &
some items (MDT, mini backhoe, backhoe, EQUIPMENTS FROM S04 CAN NOT BE UTILIZED IN
Attachment 2 hydraulic rail lifter, hydraulic track jack, grinder 7”, THIS PROPOSAL BECASUSE THERE ARE STILL
48 EA 20-footer container van, crane) are higher N/A Closed BDM UNFINISHED DISMANTLING WORKS FOR S04 &
DUPA
compared to Package S-04. Kindly clarify. S06.
No further comment
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes DISMANTLING WORKS ON S04 TO S06 WAS NOT
subcontractor in the revised proposal. The rates YET COMPLETED DUE TO ON-GOING REVENUE
with salvage cost on S-04 to S-06 was applied in LINES OF PNR UNTIL ALABANG STATION AND THE
this proposal. Example equipment are push rail ISSUES FOR IN-FORMAL SETTLERS WAS NOT YET
trolley, rail trolley with towing bar, rail lifting beam RESOLVED, THEREFORE, WE CAN NOT UTILIZED
with roller chain block, hydraulic rail lifter, hydraulic THE EQUIPMENTS PURCHASED FOR S04,S05 &
Attachment 2 track jack, rail tong, rail saw, sleeper tong, & S06.
49 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA demolition hammer.
The Packages S-04 to S-06 are nearly complete
thus the rates in the proposal for this package shall
be rental only. Kindly clarify.
No further comment
Contractor to clarify the rates on 6.7KVA generator, Yes DISMANTLING WORKS ON S04 TO S06 WAS NOT
Attachment 2 tower light (PHP 178,560) & sledge hammer are YET COMPLETED DUE TO ON-GOING REVENUE
50 EA rates of new equipment instead of rental rate only. N/A Closed BDM LINES OF PNR UNTIL ALABANG STATION AND THE
DUPA
ISSUES FOR IN-FORMAL SETTLERS WAS NOT YET
18 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
Attachment 2
53 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA
No further comment
Contractor to clarify the need of 2 teams for labor Yes 1 TEAM FOR LOADING & 1 TEAM FOR UNLOADING
and 2 boomtruck for productivity of 1 x 20-footer
Attachment 2 container van per day
54 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA 5-3
No further comment
19 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
No further comment
It was observed that the rate of rebars, marine Yes ADJUSTED UNIT PRICE BASED ON THE CURRENT
plywood, C-purlins and ready-mix concrete are MARKET VALUE
high compared to prevailing market rates. Kindly
Attachment 2 clarify.
57 EA N/A Closed BDM UPON CHECKING, THE PRICE GOVERNS SINCE
DUPA 15-5
THE READY MIX IS A SPECIAL ORDER (4,000 PSI
W/ 3 DAYS CURING TIME) AND THE QUANTITY IS
No further comment SMALL.
It was observed that Joratech is the recommended Yes THE COMPLETION OF RECOVERY WORKS IS
subcontractor in the revised proposal. AROUND 7 MONTHS PLUS 1 MONTH FOR
Kindly clarify the duration of 9 months when as per MOBILIZATION & ANOTHER 1 MONTH
Addendum 5 (TOR 5) is only between 7 – 8 DEMOBILIZATION. WE NEEDED 1 MONTH FOR
Attachment 2
58 EA months. N/A Closed BDM MOBILIZATION SINCE WE NEED TO ESTABLISH
DUPA 17
OUR LAYDOWN AREA AND PURCHASED
ADDITIONAL TOOLS FOR THE PROJECT. WE ALSO
NEED TO RECRUIT MANPOWER DURING THE
No further comment MOBILIZATION PERIOD
It seems that the description “Protective” and “And Yes " PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) -
temporary” are incomplete. 1,233,750.00
BARRICADES AND TEMPORARY ENCLOSURES -
329,000.00 "
Attachment 2
59 EA N/A Closed BDM
DUPA 17
Kindly clarify.
20 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
No further comment
It was observed that Easternforce Security is the
recommended security subcontractor in the revised
proposal. The proposal from Easternforce that we submitted is
Attachment 2 Kindly clarify the 30% administrative overhead or the latest proposal after we have clarification and
62 EA DUPA 14-1, 14- the rate of PHP 12,281.49 when on S-01 proposal, N/A Closed BDM negotiation with them.
2 with the same security agency, it is PHP 9,651.09
No further comment
Note:
Latest Reviewer’s Comments are in Blue
Comment Type (for individual comments): A = critical nature, non-compliant; B = intermediate nature, to be responded to in subsequent submission; C = minor nature, may affect future submission.
List of
Reviewer
MS, Mayumi Shoji (Resident Engineer S- EA, Elna Abarientos (Cost Estimator) SH, Seigfred Hobayan (Schedule Engineer 3
03a and S-03c) (S-01 & S-03c)
TK, Tomonori Kato (Sr. Resident YW, Yusuke Watanabe (Sr. Resident BDM, Albert De Munck (Contract Manager 2 RMA, Roy Angeles (Construction DM, Doitsu Matsuki (SC Civil / Station Team
List of Engineer S-01 & S-03c) Engineer 2 CP S-03b) SC) Schedule Expert SC) Leader)
Checker:
21 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023
NORTH-SOUTH COMMUTER RAILWAY EXTENSION
(NSCR-EX) PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW COMMENT (DRC) SHEET
GCR Sub-consultant/Contractor*
Issued By: Responded By:
22 | P a g e
Form no.: GCR/QA/0001, Rev C, 08-Sep-2023