Atomic Scale Dynamics at Surfaces

Theory and Experimental Studies with

Helium Atom Scattering Giorgio
Benedek
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/atomic-scale-dynamics-at-surfaces-theory-and-experi
mental-studies-with-helium-atom-scattering-giorgio-benedek/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Space Engineering Modeling and Optimization with Case

Studies 1st Edition Giorgio Fasano

https://textbookfull.com/product/space-engineering-modeling-and-
optimization-with-case-studies-1st-edition-giorgio-fasano/

Practical Natural Language Processing with Python With

Case Studies from Industries Using Text Data at Scale
1st Edition Mathangi Sri

https://textbookfull.com/product/practical-natural-language-
processing-with-python-with-case-studies-from-industries-using-
text-data-at-scale-1st-edition-mathangi-sri/

Dynamics of the Unicycle: Modelling and Experimental

Verification Micha■ Nie■aczny

https://textbookfull.com/product/dynamics-of-the-unicycle-
modelling-and-experimental-verification-michal-nielaczny/

Basic Mathematical Programming Theory 3rd Edition

Giorgio Giorgi

https://textbookfull.com/product/basic-mathematical-programming-
theory-3rd-edition-giorgio-giorgi/
Controlled Radical Polymerization at and from Solid
Surfaces 1st Edition Philipp Vana (Eds.)

https://textbookfull.com/product/controlled-radical-
polymerization-at-and-from-solid-surfaces-1st-edition-philipp-
vana-eds/

Advanced Analytics with Spark Patterns for Learning

from Data at Scale 2nd Edition Sandy Ryza

https://textbookfull.com/product/advanced-analytics-with-spark-
patterns-for-learning-from-data-at-scale-2nd-edition-sandy-ryza/

Analytics Engineering With SQL and dbt: Building

Meaningful Data Models at Scale 1st Edition Rui Pedro
Machado

https://textbookfull.com/product/analytics-engineering-with-sql-
and-dbt-building-meaningful-data-models-at-scale-1st-edition-rui-
pedro-machado/

Natural Language Processing with Spark NLP Learning to

Understand Text at Scale 1st Edition Alex Thomas

https://textbookfull.com/product/natural-language-processing-
with-spark-nlp-learning-to-understand-text-at-scale-1st-edition-
alex-thomas/

Scale Development Theory and Applications Robert F.

Devellis

https://textbookfull.com/product/scale-development-theory-and-
applications-robert-f-devellis/
Springer Series in Surface Sciences 63

Giorgio Benedek
Jan Peter Toennies

Atomic Scale
Dynamics at
Surfaces
Theory and Experimental Studies with
Helium Atom Scattering
Springer Series in Surface Sciences

Volume 63

Series editors
Roberto Car, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Gerhard Ertl, Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
Hans-Joachim Freund, Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Berlin,
Germany
Hans Lüth, Peter Grünberg Institute, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich,
Germany
Mario Agostino Rocca, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Genova,
Genova, Italy
This series covers the whole spectrum of surface sciences, including structure and
dynamics of clean and adsorbate-covered surfaces, thin films, basic surface effects,
analytical methods and also the physics and chemistry of interfaces. Written by
leading researchers in the field, the books are intended primarily for researchers in
academia and industry and for graduate students.

More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/409

Giorgio Benedek Jan Peter Toennies
•

Atomic Scale Dynamics

at Surfaces
Theory and Experimental Studies with Helium
Atom Scattering

123
Giorgio Benedek Jan Peter Toennies
Università di Milano-Bicocca Max Planck Institute for Dynamics
Milan, Italy and Self-Organization
Göttingen, Germany
and

Donostia International Physics Center

Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain

ISSN 0931-5195 ISSN 2198-4743 (electronic)

Springer Series in Surface Sciences
ISBN 978-3-662-56441-7 ISBN 978-3-662-56443-1 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56443-1

Library of Congress Control Number: 2018932184

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part
of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from
the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or
for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer-Verlag GmbH,

DE part of Springer Nature
The registered company address is: Heidelberger Platz 3, 14197 Berlin, Germany
We dedicate this book to our wives Carmen
and Monika. We thank them for their selfless
patience, their constant support and enduring
encouragement.
Preface

So eine Arbeit wird eigentlich nie fertig,

man muss sie für fertig erklären,
wenn man nach Zeit und Umständen
das Möglichste getan hat.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Helium atom diffraction from surfaces was first reported by Otto Stern and col-
leagues in two short communications (Z. Phys. 53,779; Naturwissenschaften
21,391) in 1929. Two years earlier, Davisson and Germer had observed the
diffraction of electrons from a crystal of nickel. These two events ushered in the
present era of atomic scale determinations of the structure of surfaces. Many spec-
tacular atom-surface scattering phenomena, including selective adsorption, the
temporary trapping of atoms in the surface bound states, followed from Stern’s
laboratory until he was forced to leave Germany in 1933. After World War II, there
was a slow renaissance of interest in surface physics and chemistry. In 1970, a
visionary quantum mechanical scattering calculation by Cabrera et al. (Surface Sci.
19, 67) predicted that helium atoms in analogy to neutrons, which had then been
used to measure bulk phonon dispersion curves, would be the ideal probe to
determine the dispersion curves of the phonons at the surfaces of solids. The first
successful experiment was then reported in the laboratory of one of the authors in
1981 (Brusdeylins et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1417) and the first successful exper-
iment using electrons followed in 1983 (Szeftel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 518).
Since then the phonon dispersion curves of more than 200 surfaces of insulators,
semiconductors, metals, semimetals, layered crystals, and ultrathin films, and in
addition, the vibrations and surface diffusion of a multitude of isolated adsorbed
atoms and the phonons of monolayer films of inorganic and organic molecules have
been investigated largely using helium atom scattering (HAS) and by the com-
plementary method of electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). These experi-
ments were preceded by a decade of extensive theoretical studies of the vibrations
at surfaces based on the idealization of the surface as a termination of the bulk. For
many substances, these simple model predictions were often found to be in conflict
with the experimental results. Moreover in all the types of materials, many unan-
ticipated phenomena were observed. This led to the realization that the interactions
between atoms in the surface region frequently differ significantly from those in the
bulk. Even in the case of closed-shell insulators such as the solid rare gases and
alkali halide crystal surfaces, substantial deviations from the ideal surface behavior

vii
viii Preface

are found. Unexpected phenomena also occur in a number of semiconductors, such

as Si and GaAs, and charge density wave materials such as TaSe2 and TaS2. In the
case of metals, the HAS experiments invariably reveal an additional unexpected
anomalous soft surface phonon branch lying below the expected longitudinal
acoustic band, but above the ubiquitous Rayleigh mode with an intensity which can
even be larger than that of the Rayleigh mode. The large intensity of this mode, and
the fact that it was often not, or only weakly, seen with EELS led ultimately to the
understanding that He atoms excite the phonons at the metal surface by coupling
predominantly to the spill-out electrons several Ångstroms above the surface atoms.
For metal surfaces which are known to reconstruct, such as W(001), the anomalous
modes exhibit sharp minima in the phonon frequencies (soft modes) at special
wavevectors at temperatures above the structural transition. These and other find-
ings stimulated new theoretical investigations based on microscopic models and
first-principle methods where the role of surface electrons is explicitly taken into
account. Striking confirmation came in 2009 from helium atom scattering experi-
ments off of thin films of lead in which a large fraction of all of the modes of the
entire film were observed and their intensities found to be proportional to the
electron–phonon coupling constant. Now it is clear that in the case of metals He
atoms interact primarily with the Fermi level electron density at the surface leading
to a non-local excitation of electrons over many layers and thereby can excite deep
subsurface phonons (quantum sonar effect) and even surface electron excitations in
the THz energy domain. Thus, it is now firmly established that helium atom
scattering is truly unique among all the atomic scale surface-sensitive scattering
probes. The purpose of this monograph is to summarize this development and the
current state of the field of atomic scale surface dynamics which has come largely
from helium atom scattering combined with theory.
This book consists of altogether 14 chapters. They are designed to introduce the
reader to the basic and the current microscopic theory. Subsequently, the experi-
mental methods are described in preparation for a comprehensive overview of the
experimental results and their current interpretation. The text is designed to provide
an in-depth modern account of the atomic scale dynamics at surfaces. It is aimed at
advanced graduate students and scientists working in the area of surface physics
and chemistry. Each chapter starts with a general discussion so that less initiated
readers interested in surfaces will be able to gain an impression of the many
remarkable dynamical phenomena occurring in and on surfaces.
As explained in Chap. 1, surface phonons are not only intensively studied for
fundamental reasons, but also since they have several perspective technological
applications in micro- and nano-devices. Chapter 1 also discusses the advantage of
helium atom scattering over other surface-sensitive scattering probes, such as STM
and AFM, due to its unique interaction mechanism. Moreover, because of the low
energy and the inert nature of helium atoms they are unmatched in being completely
nondestructive and insensitive to electric and magnetic fields at the surface. In
Chap. 2 the historical evolution of the theory of surface phonons, which goes back
to the fundamental research of Rayleigh in 1885, is described. The early devel-
opments in atom-surface scattering including the important experiments in Otto
Preface ix

Stern’s group in Hamburg in the early 1930s are summarized, and the early surface
phonon experiments based on HAS and EELS are described. Then in Chap. 3, the
fundamental concepts concerning the origin and nature of surface phonons are
surveyed. After presenting the Rayleigh theory of surface dynamics based on the
analytical solution of the wave equation, Chap. 3 introduces the reader to the two
basic theoretical techniques of surface lattice dynamics, the slab and Green’s
function method, and to the notation used to label the different types of surface
phonons. Chapter 4 outlines how the surface affects the force constants of atoms in
the solid and how the perturbed force constants affect the surface phonon dispersion
curves. Chapter 5 is devoted to the theoretical methods currently in use for the
calculation of surface phonons and how they are derived from methods currently in
use in bulk dynamics. Special emphasis is given to the methods which go beyond
the Born–von Kármán force-constant model paradigm to account explicitly for the
role of electrons in the surface lattice dynamics of semiconductors and metals.
Chapter 6 introduces the reader to the frequently used phenomenological potentials
which govern the overall interaction between the probe atom and the surface. This
chapter also introduces the reader to the important differences between the soft
metal surfaces and the relatively hard inert insulator surfaces, a theme which will be
dealt with in more detail in Chap. 8. Whereas the Chaps. 4 and 5 are devoted to the
interactions within the surface, in Chap. 7 the methods used to describe the inelastic
coupling of the He atoms to surface vibrations are discussed at different levels of
approximation, with special emphasis to theories used for insulator surfaces. Here
also the different mechanisms for multiphonon scattering are briefly reviewed, and
the effects of surface temperature on the scattering and the conditions favoring
one-phonon inelastic processes are discussed. Chapter 8 emphasizes one of the
main themes of the book, namely the very special nature of the interaction of the He
atoms with metal and semiconductor surfaces, which is not at all the same as for
electrons and neutrons, as assumed in the early history of surface phonon research.
To prepare the reader for the experimental results presented in Chaps. 11 and 12,
Chap. 9 describes the apparatus and the experimental methods. The most wide-
spread method of time-of-flight (TOF-HAS) spectroscopy has relatively recently
been augmented by spin echo spectroscopy (SE-HAS) with a much higher energy
resolution. Chapter 9 also contains a quantitative comparison with electron energy
loss spectroscopy and provides a detailed analysis of the factors which affect the
resolution in the TOF-HAS experiments. The rich phenomenology accompanying
the scattering and interaction of atoms with surfaces is discussed in Chap. 10.
Special emphasis is devoted to resonant phenomena involving surface-atom bound
states which can affect the elastic and inelastic intensities, and may be used to
enhance the response of the scattering atoms from particular surface phonons.
The previous chapters lead up to the important Chap. 11, which contains a
critical discussion in the light of the theory of the benchmark experimental results
on clean solid surfaces, collected during the last decades with HAS, with frequent
comparisons to EELS studies. The chapter first addresses results for the insulator
rare gas solids and alkali halide crystals. Next, the experiments on the semicon-
ductor surfaces, silicon and gallium arsenide, are surveyed. The major part of the
x Preface

chapter is devoted to the simple metals and the transition metals. Finally, the results
for graphene and graphite surfaces and for other layered materials, including
topological insulators, are discussed. Chapter 12 contains a similar description of
HAS results on the low-energy vibrations of isolated atoms and molecules. The
results on the coupled vibrations of monolayer and thicker films of atoms and
molecules are also reviewed. Here again the extreme sensitivity of helium atom
scattering has provided unexpected information on the vibrations normal to the
surface and even on modes at the substrate interface of thin films with up to 20
layers. Chapter 13 is devoted to new applications of helium atom scattering to areas
not directly related to phonons, for example, to the study of surface magnetism and
plasmarons. Here also the many results on the microscopic dynamics of diffusion,
which have come largely from TOF-HAS and SE-HAS studies, are surveyed.
Finally in the last chapter, Chap. 14, the vast improvements in both resolution and
sensitivity now available or conceivable and possible for the next generation HAS
apparatus are briefly outlined. Even with the present technology, there are many
areas awaiting exploration with helium scattering such as liquid surfaces, organic
films of interest in the new area organic electronics, biological films, and clusters on
surfaces forming supraclusters.
The book closes with several appendices for quick reference. In Appendix A, the
different theoretical methods and the surfaces investigated by the different methods
are listed. Appendix B contains a complete collection of all the results of all the
experimental studies with HAS and the calculations of surface phonon dispersion
curves, with references to publications up to early 2018. Appendix C contains a
tabulation of experimental studies of monolayers and thicker films on single crystal
substrates, except for hydrogen-covered surfaces, which are listed together with the
clean surfaces in Appendix B. Finally, Appendix D provides a list of surface Debye
temperatures compared with the bulk Debye and melting temperatures. We hope
that these appendices will help those readers who are mostly interested in the
surface phonons of specific surfaces to quickly find the sought after information and
the references to the literature.
This book would not have been possible without the contribution of a large
number of diploma, master, and Ph.D. students who were at one time working in
the groups of the authors. All the important experiments were carried out by stu-
dents, and much of the insight came from intensive discussions with the students in
the countless efforts to clarify the concepts. Among the many students, Bruce Doak
deserves special mention since he constructed the first successful TOF-HAS
apparatus and succeeded in measuring the first surface phonon dispersion curve.
Students also contributed to the development of the theory which went hand in hand
with the new phenomena found in the time-of-flight spectra.
Many postdoctoral associates contributed directly or indirectly to the results
reported here. In alphabetic order they include Bruce Doak, John Ellis, Anna
Franchini, Joost Frenken, Georg Gensterblum, Andrew Graham, Jane Hinch,
Angela Lahee, Ninsheng Luo, Alexander Menzel, Salvador Miret-Artés, Vania
Panella, Robert Rechsteiner, Paolo Ruggerone, Giorgio Santoro, Patrick Senet,
Jochen Vogt, and Helmuth Weiss. Both authors are indebted to many of their more
Preface xi

senior colleagues especially to the theory pioneers Vittorio Celli and Joseph (Dick)
Manson who accompanied us with their advice and ideas over the entire time that
we were working on the book. We are very grateful to Dick Manson for his careful
reading of the manuscript.
Other colleagues who provided valuable guidance are in alphabetic order of their
institutions: Luciano Colombo (Cagliari), Evgueni Chulkov, Pedro Echenique,
Ricardo Diez-Muiño and Irina Sklyadneva (DIPC San Sebastian), Davide Campi
(EPFL Lausanne), Andrea Levi and Ugo Valbusa (Genoa), Wolfgang Ernst and
Toni Tamtögl (Graz), Chakram Jayanthi (Louisville), Gloria Platero and Victor
Velasco (Madrid), Giovanni Onida (Milano), Marco Bernasconi, Gian Paolo Brivio
and Leo Miglio (Milano-Bicocca), Virginio (Bibi), Bortolani (Modena), Amand
Lucas (Namur), Paolo Santini (Parma), Ulrich Schroeder (Regensburg), Jim
Skofronick (Tallahassee), Geza Seriani (Trieste), and Branko Gumhalter (Zagreb).
Finally, we thank Gil Alexandrowicz and John Ellis for reading and correcting the
discussion of the spin echo experiments.
Without the staff of the Max Planck Institut für Strömungsforschung under the
leadership of Wolfgang Sattler, the apparatus, the experiments, and the experi-
mental results reported here would not have been possible. The Göttingen staff
scientist Ekkehard Hulpke, who started the surface activities at the very beginning
of the establishment of the experimental group of JPT in 1970 and Guido
Brusdeylins, were invaluable in providing guidance to the many students.
We thank the Alexander von Humboldt Society for the grant of a Humboldt
Senior Award Prize to Giorgio Benedek. During his one-year stay in Göttingen in
1990 and 1991, the collaborative effort leading to the present monograph was
initiated. The continuation of this collaboration was greatly strengthened by the
award of the Max Planck Prize in 1992 and a short reinvitation awards in 2004 and
2009.
Finally, we would like to acknowledge the suggestion by Charlie Duke after
critically reading our joint review for “Surface Science, the First Thirty Years” to
write a more complete review with more detail. This got us started in 1994, but in
the following intervening years we were regularly distracted by other joint projects
which at the time were deemed to be more pressing. Thus as the field developed we
were forced to update many sections and passages. Each time when nearly finished
new more exciting developments not only in the areas covered by the book but also
in other fields led to a renewed postponement. We hope that the constant updating
and reviewing of the previous versions have added to the clarity without burdening
the text too much.
Last but not least, we wish to thank Claus Ascheron and Angela Lahee of the
Springer Verlag in Heidelberg for not having lost hope in the completion of the
book and for forgiving us for not meeting several of our self-imposed deadlines.

Göttingen, Germany Giorgio Benedek

Jan Peter Toennies
Contents

1 Surface Dynamics, An Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 1

1.1 Surface Acoustic Waves in Nature and Technology . . . . . . ... 1
1.1.1 Frequency Range of Surface Acoustic Waves . . . . ... 1
1.1.2 Surface Acoustic Wave Visualization and Surface
Characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 3
1.1.3 SAW Acousto-Electronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 6
1.2 Fundamental Interactions at Surfaces from Surface Phonon
Spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 10
1.2.1 Physical Properties of Surfaces Compared
to the Bulk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 10
1.2.2 Scanning Tunnel Microscopy Probes of Surface
Vibrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 14
1.2.3 Scattering Probes of Surface Vibrations . . . . . . . . . ... 15
1.2.4 Helium Atom Scattering (HAS) Versus Electron
Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
1.2.5 Single Versus Multiphonon Regimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.2.6 Kinematics of Single Phonon Surface Scattering . . . . . 22
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2 History of Surface Phonons and Helium Atom Scattering . . . . . . . 31
2.1 History of Surface Phonon Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.1.1 Continuum Versus Atomistic Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.1.2 Evolution of Present Day Surface Phonon Theories . . . 33
2.2 History of Surface Phonon Spectroscopy by Helium Atom
Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.2.1 Early Developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.2.2 Early Helium Atom Scattering Experiments . . . . . . . . . 36
2.2.3 Early Electron Scattering Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

xiii
xiv Contents

2.3 Historyof Inelastic Atom Scattering Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

2.3.1 Classical Scattering Theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
2.3.2 Semiclassical Scattering Theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.3.3 Quantum Scattering Theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2.3.4 Quantum Scattering Theory: Metal Surfaces
and Debye-Waller Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ 41
2.3.5 Quantum Scattering Theory: Developments
Since 1980 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
2.3.6 Summary and Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.4 Further Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
3 The Physics of Surface Phonons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
3.1 The Dispersion Curves of Surface Versus Bulk Phonons . . . . . . 57
3.2 Rayleigh Theory of Surface Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
3.2.1 Isotropic Elastic Continuum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
3.2.2 Dispersive Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
3.2.3 Anisotropic Crystals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
3.3 Born-von Kármán Theory: Bulk Phonons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
3.4 Surface-Projected Bulk Phonons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
3.5 Effects of the Surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
3.5.1 The Rayleigh Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
3.5.2 The Green’s Function Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3.5.3 The Slab Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
3.6 Localization of Surface Modes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
3.7 Classification of Surface Modes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3.7.1 Polarizations and Displacement Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3.7.2 An Illustrative Example: NaF(001) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
3.7.3 Surface Phonon Labels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
4 The Effect of the Surface Termination on Force Constants
and Dispersion Curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
4.1 Surface Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
4.2 The Intrinsic Surface Perturbation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
4.3 Surface Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
4.4 The Effect of Force Constant Changes on Surface Phonon
Dispersion Curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
4.4.1 Surface Force Constant Perturbations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
4.4.2 Merits and Limits of BvK Force Constant Fits . . . . . . . 111
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
Contents xv

5 Theoretical Methods of Surface Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

5.1 Introductory Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
5.2 The Important Role of Electrons in the Dispersion
of Surface Phonons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
5.3 The Multipole Expansion (ME) Method and the Pseudocharge
(PC) Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
5.4 From Semi-empirical to Ab initio Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
5.4.1 Tight-Binding Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
5.4.2 Pseudopotentials and Density Response . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
5.4.3 Phonons out of DFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
5.5 Density Functional Pertubation Theory (DFPT) . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
6 The Atom-Surface Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
6.1.1 Atom-Surface Scattering Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
6.1.2 The Corrugation of the Atom-Surface Potential . . . . . . 145
6.1.3 Additive Potentials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
6.1.4 Two-Body Atom-Atom Potentials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
6.2 The Long Range Attractive Atom-Surface Potential . . . . . . . . . 152
6.2.1 Continuum Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
6.2.2 Layer Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
6.2.3 Celli Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
6.2.4 Zaremba-Kohn Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
6.2.5 Experimental Data on the Long Range Attractive
Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
6.3 Lennard-Jones Atom-Surface Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
6.4 Other Atom-Surface Potentials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
6.4.1 Hard Corrugated Surface (HCS) Potential . . . . . . . . . . 162
6.4.2 Exponential Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
6.5 Tang-Toennies Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
6.6 Metal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
6.6.1 Smoothing of Metal Surfaces by Conduction
Electrons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
6.6.2 Atom-Metal Surface Potential in the Local Density
Approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
6.6.3 Soft Corrugated Surface (SCS) Potential and Cut Off
Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
7 Theory of Atom Scattering from Surface Phonons: Basic
Concepts and Temperature Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
7.1 Inelastic Scattering from Phonons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
7.2 Inelastic Reflection Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
xvi Contents

7.3 The Distorted-Wave Born Approximation (DWBA) . . . . . . . . . 188

7.3.1 General Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
7.3.2 Jackson-Mott Analytical Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
7.3.3 Cabrera-Celli-Manson DWBA for Corrugated
Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
7.4 The GR Method and the Eikonal Approximation . . . . . . . . . . . 197
7.5 Selection Rules and Propensities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
7.5.1 Insulator Surfaces and Pairwise Additive Potentials . . . 202
7.5.2 The Dynamic Factor for the Exponential Surface
Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
7.6 Multiphonon Scattering and Temperature Effects . . . . . . . . . . . 206
7.6.1 Mechanisms for Multiphonon Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . 206
7.6.2 Multiphonon Processes in the Distorted-Wave Born
Approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
7.6.3 Temperature Effects: The Debye-Waller Factor . . . . . . 211
7.6.4 Criteria for One-Phonon Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
7.6.5 Limitations of the Two-Body Collision Model . . . . . . . 223
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
8 Theory of Atom Scattering from Surface Phonon: The Role
of Electron-Phonon Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
8.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
8.2 Coupling of the He Atoms to the Electrons
at Metal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
8.3 Calculation of Inelastic HAS Intensities
from Metal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
8.3.1 Application of the Multiple Expansion (ME)
Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
8.3.2 Implementation of the Pseudocharge PC Model . . . . . . 232
8.3.3 Other Models for Metal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
8.4 A First Principles Electron-Phonon Theory of Inelastic
He Atom Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
8.4.1 The Role of the Electron-Phonon Coupling . . . . . . . . . 236
8.4.2 Mode-Selected Electron-Phonon Coupling Strengths
from HAS Inelastic Intensities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
8.4.3 The Electron-Phonon Coupling Strength
from the HAS Debye-Waller Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
8.5 Propensities for Scattering from Metal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
8.5.1 Difference in Propensities Between Insulator
and Metal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
8.5.2 Pseudocharge Effects at Conducting Surfaces . . . . . . . . 247
Contents xvii

8.5.3 Propensities in Inelastic HAS Scattering

from Conducting Ultrathin Films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250
9 Experimental Methods of HAS Surface Phonon Spectroscopy . . . . 253
9.1 Kinematics of Surface Phonon Spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
9.2 Planar Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256
9.3 Non-sagittal and Non-planar Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
9.4 He Atom Scattering (TOF-HAS) Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
9.4.1 The Göttingen Time-of-Flight (TOF-HAS)
Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266
9.4.2 Other HAS Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
9.4.3 Spin Echo 3He Atom Scattering (SE-HAS)
Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
9.5 Electron Energy Loss Scattering (EELS) Apparatus . . . . . . . . . 279
9.6 Comparison of HAS and EELS Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
9.7 Intensity Figure of Merit of a HAS Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
9.8 Resolution of a HAS Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
9.9 Deceptons and Spurions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
9.10 Procedures and Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
9.10.1 A Wealth of Valuable Information from a Complex
Experimental Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
9.10.2 Importance of Angular Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
9.10.3 Analysis of Time-of-Flight (TOF) Data . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
10 Resonances and Critical Kinematic Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
10.1 Bound State Resonances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
10.1.1 Atom-Surface Potentials and Bound States . . . . . . . . . . 307
10.1.2 Elastic Bound State Selective Adsorption (SA)
Resonances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309
10.1.3 Inelastic Bound State Resonances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
10.1.4 Theory of Inelastic Intensities at Resonances . . . . . . . . 319
10.2 Critical Kinematic Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
10.2.1 Kinematical Focusing (KF) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
10.2.2 Focused Inelastic Resonances (FIR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
10.2.3 Surfing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334
11 Experimental Results: Surface Phonons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
11.1 Insulators: Nearly Ideal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
11.1.1 Rare Gas Crystals: Xe(111) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
11.1.2 Ionic Crystals: The Alkali Halides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
11.1.3 Ionic Crystals: AgBr(001) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
xviii Contents

11.2 Semiconductors: Surface Phonons and Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . 349

11.2.1 Si(111) 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
11.2.2 Si(111) 77 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353
11.2.3 GaAs(110) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
11.3 Metals: Effects of the Electron-Phonon Interaction . . . . . . . . . . 360
11.3.1 Simple Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metal Surfaces . . . . . 360
11.3.2 Aluminum and Lead Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
11.3.3 Noble Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368
11.3.4 Transition Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
11.3.5 The Clean (001) Surfaces of Tungsten and
Molybdenum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383
11.3.6 The Hydrogen Saturated (110) Surfaces of Tungsten
and Molybdenum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387
11.4 Layered Crystals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393
11.4.1 Graphite and Graphene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394
11.4.2 Pnictogen Semimetals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400
11.4.3 Layered Semiconductor Chalcogenides GaSe
and InSe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403
11.4.4 Layered Metallic Chalcogenides TaSe2 and TaS2 . . . . . 408
11.4.5 Layered Pnictogen Chalcogenides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416
11.5 Complex Long-Period Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417
11.5.1 Stepped Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417
11.5.2 Reconstructed Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420
11.5.3 Quasicrystal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 422
11.5.4 Disordered Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426
12 Experimental Results: Vibrations of Adsorbates
and Thin Films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441
12.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442
12.2 Vibrations of Submonolayer Adsorbates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444
12.2.1 CO Molecules on Metal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444
12.2.2 Na on Metal Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445
12.3 Monolayer and Thicker Films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448
12.3.1 Rare-Gas Ultrathin Films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450
12.3.2 Metal Ultrathin Films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454
12.3.3 Thick Metal Films: Organ-Pipe Modes and Sezawa
Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 456
12.3.4 The Quantum Sonar Effect and Stoneley Waves
in Ultrathin Lead Films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461
12.4 Organic Molecules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471
Contents xix

12.5 Self-assembled Monolayers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474

12.6 Chemisorbed Adlayers on Semiconductor Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . 477
12.7 Atomic Rows Adsorbed at Surface Steps:
Quasi 1D Phonons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480
13 Experimental Results: Beyond Single Phonons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487
13.1 Multiphonon Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487
13.2 Diffusion of Submonolayer Adsorbates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494
13.2.1 The Quasi-elastic Scattering Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494
13.2.2 Time-of-Flight Quasi-elastic Helium Scattering
(TOF-QHAS) Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496
13.2.3 3He Spin Echo Quasi-elastic Scattering Method
(SE-QHAS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
13.3 Anharmonicities and High Temperature Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505
13.4 Magnetic Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511
13.5 HAS Spectroscopy of Low Energy Surface Electron
Excitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519
13.5.1 Searching for Surface Electron-Hole
Pair Excitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519
13.5.2 Low Energy Surface Plasmons and Plasmarons
in Semiconductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 520
13.5.3 HAS from Acoustic Surface Plasmons (ASP) . . . . . . . . 523
13.6 High Energy Atom Inelastic Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 528
13.7 The Vibrational Dynamics of Clusters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535
13.8 The Helium Microscope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540
14 Future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549
14.1 Future Helium Atom Scattering Apparatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549
14.1.1 The Ultimate Machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549
14.2 Other Future Applications of Helium Atom Scattering . . . . . . . 551
14.2.1 Liquid Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551
14.2.2 Organic Electronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553
14.2.3 Biological Films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554
14.2.4 Clusters and Supracrystals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 555
14.2.5 He Atom as a Mechanical Probe of Electronic
Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 556
14.3 Future Challenges for Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 557
14.4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 558
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 559
xx Contents

Appendix A: Tables of HAS Surface Phonon Experiments

and Related Theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563
Appendix B: Surface Debye Temperatures from HAS data with some
values from other methods (hydrogen atom scattering
(HyAS), D2 scattering (D2S), low energy electron
diffraction (LEED, low energy ion diffraction (LEIS),
medium-energy ion diffraction (MEIS)) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 597
Appendix C: Diffusion Coefficients from Time-of-Flight Quasi-elastic
4
He Atom Scattering (TOF-QHAS) and from Spin Echo
Quasi-elastic 3He Atom Scattering (SE-QHAS)
Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605
Appendix D: Energy Conversion Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609
Subject Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 611
Acronyms

−MP Negative modified Pandey configuration, buckling

+MP Positive modified Pandey configuration, buckling
1D One-dimensional
1DEG One-dimensional electron gas
2D Two-dimensional
2DEG Two-dimensional electron gas
3D Three-dimensional (also referred to film growth regime)
4NNFC Fourth nearest neighbor force constant (model)
ABINIT Ab initio programs implementing DFT on a plane-wave basis
AF Antiferromagnetic
AFM Atomic force microscopy
AL Anomalous longitudinal
AP Acoustic phason
ARPES Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
ASP Acoustic surface plasmon
BCM Bond charge model
BE Bose-Einstein
BISSCO Bismuth strontium calcium cuprate
BMB Brownian molecular dynamics
BSGF Breathing-shell-model Green’s function calculation
BSM Breathing shell model
BvK Born–von Kármán
BZ Brillouin zone
CASTEP Cambridge Serial Total Energy Package using DFT on a plane-wave
basis
CC Close-coupling
CDO Charge density oscillation

xxi
xxii Acronyms

CDW Charge density wave

CE Continuum elastic theory
CFM Continued fraction method
C-M Clausius–Mossotti
CM Cluster model
CP Car–Parrinello
CPM Car–Parrinello method
CPU Central processing unit
DAS Dimer-adatom stacking-fault model
DE Diffuse elastic
DFPT Density functional perturbation theory
DFT Density functional theory
DLC Dispersive linear chain
DOI Digital object identifier
DOS Density of states
DR Density (dielectric) response
DRRS Double resonance Raman spectroscopy
DSM Double-shell model
DT Decanethiol
DW Debye–Waller
DWBA Distorted-wave Born approximation
EA Embedded atom
EAM Effective mass approximation
EAM Embedded atom method
EAMD Embedded atom molecular dynamics
EBA Exponentiated Born approximation
EBOA Extended band orbital approximation
EC Equivalent crystal
EELS Electron energy loss spectroscopy
EM Effective medium (theory)
ESI Electrospray ionization
FC Force constant (model)
fcc Face-centered cubic
FLASH Free-Electron Laser Hamburg
FIR Focused inelastic resonance
FK Fuchs and Kliever
FLAPW Full-potential linearized plane-wave method
FM Ferromagnetic
FP First principle
FP-DR First principle–density response
FPM Frozen phonon method
FPTB First-principle tight binding
FR-PAW Fully relativistic projector-augmented wave method
F-S Finnis–Sinclair
FS Focused surfing
Acronyms xxiii

FT Frustrated translation
F-vdM Frank–van der Merwe
FWHM Full width at half maximum
GF Green’s function
GGA Generalized gradient approximation
GM Glue model
GM-MD Glue model molecular dynamics
GR Reciprocal direct space (method)
HAS Helium atom scattering (also IHAS: inelastic HAS) spectroscopy
HCS Hard corrugated surface
HCP Hexagonal close Packing
HD Hydrodynamic equations
He3SE 3He spin echo scattering spectroscopy
HEIS High energy ion scattering
HF Hellmann–Feynmann (forces, theorem)
HFD Hartree–Fock dispersion (potential, known in different types: B, B2,
etc)
HR Hindered rotation
HREELS High-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy
HT Heptanethiol
HUGO II Name of a He atom scattering time-of-flight apparatus used in
Göttingen
HyAS Hydrogen atom scattering
IETS Inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy
IF Inelastic focusing
ILPES Inelastic laser photoemission spectroscopy
IRAS Infrared absorption spectroscopy
IXS Inelastic X-ray scattering
KF Kinematical focusing
KM Keating model
KS Kohn–Sham
L Longitudinal
Ln, L-n Longitudinally polarized in the n-th plane
LA Longitudinal acoustic
LB Langmuir–Blodgett
LCT Local coupling transfer method
LDA Local-density approximation
LEED Low-energy electron diffraction
LEEM Low-energy electron microscope
LJ Lennard-Jones
LM Lucas mode
LMTO Linear muffin-tin orbital
LO Longitudinal optic
LOD Linear optical diffraction
MBE Molecular beam epitaxy
xxiv Acronyms

MD Molecular dynamics
MDS Metastable de-excitation spectroscopy
ME Multipole expansion method
MEIS Medium energy ion scattering
MEEM Metastable electron emission microscopy
ML Monolayer
MP Modified Pandey (configuration)
NeAS Neon atom scattering
NEST National Enterprise for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
NEXAFS Near-edge X-ray adsorption fine structure
NIS Neutron inelastic scattering
NTCDA Naphthalenetetracarboxylic dianhydride
OFET Organic field-effect transistor
OI Ordinary inelastic process
OLED Organic light-emitting diode
OP Optical phason
PAA Phonon-assisted adsorption
PAA-SD Phonon-assisted adsorption followed by selective desorption
PAD Phonon-assisted desorption
PAW Projector-augmented wave
PC Pseudo charge model
PDF Partial density formalism
PM Paramagnetic
PMMA Polymethylmethacrylate
PPP Pseudo potential perturbation
PSW Pseudo surface waves
PTCDA Perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride
QHAS Quasi-elastic helium atom scattering
QI Quasi-ion (approximation, model)
QSM Quadrupole shell model
QW Quantum well
RAIRS Reflection absorption infrared spectroscopy
RBS Rutherford backscattering
RE Resonance enhancement
RHEED Reflection high energy electron diffraction
RIM Rigid ion model
RI Rotational invariance
RL Rocking libration
RMSD Root mean square displacement
RPA Random phase approximation
RW Rayleigh wave
SA Selective adsorption
SAM Self-assembled monolayer
SA-PAD Selective adsorption followed by phonon-assisted desorption
SAW Surface acoustic wave
Acronyms xxv

SBZ Surface Brillouin zone

SC Scan curve
SCF Self-consistent field theory
SCMBP Sutton-Chen many-body potential
SCS Soft corrugated surface
SD Selective desorption
SE-HAS Spin echo 3He atom scattering
SE-QHAS Spin echo quasi-elastic 3He atom scattering
SETE Semiempirical total energy approach
SH Shear horizontal
SHeM Scanning helium microscope
SHn, SH-n Shear-horizontally polarized in the n-th plane
S-K Stranski–Krastanov
SL Slab (method, diagonalization)
SM Shell model
S-matrix Scattering matrix
SMM Scattering matrix method
SO Spin–orbit (interaction)
SOC Spin–orbit coupling
SP Surface plasmon
S1-9 Surface mode labels (see Table 3.1)
SPLEED Spin-polarized low energy electron diffraction
SPMDS Spin-polarized metastable de-excitation spectroscopy
STEM Scanning transmission electron microscope
STM Scanning tunnel microscopy
STS Scanning tunnel spectroscopy
StW Stoneley wave
SV Shear vertical
SVn, SV-n Shear-vertically polarized in the n-th plane
SW Sezawa wave
SWn Sezawa wave of n-th order
TA Transverse acoustic
TB Tight-binding
TBSM Tight-binding second-moment (semiempirical total energy method)
TF Trial function
TI Translational invariance
T-matrix Transition matrix
TO Transverse optic
TOF Time-of-flight
TPPE Two photon photoemission
TOF-HAS Time-of-flight He atom scattering
UDA Uniform density approximation
UHV Ultra-high vacuum
UPS Ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy
US United States
xxvi Acronyms

UT Ultrathin (film)
UV Ultraviolet
VAS Vibrations at surface
VASP Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package for ab initio molecular
dynamics
vdW Van der Waals (interaction, forces, potential)
VFF Valence force field
WKB Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin
WM Wallis mode
XPS X-ray photoemission spectroscopy
ZA Z-polarized acoustic (phonon, mode, branch)
ZO Z-polarized optical (phonon, mode, branch)
ZJM Zener-Jackson-Mott
ZK Zaremba-Kohn
Chapter 1
Surface Dynamics, An Introduction

The surfaces of bodies are the field of very powerful forces of

whose action we know but little.

Lord Rayleigh, 1842–1919

(from A. Zangwill, Physics at Surfaces)

Abstract Surface elastic waves, discovered by Lord Rayleigh in the late 19th
century in the realm of seismology, besides occurring in nature over a wide range of
length scales, have found a broad spectrum of technological applications
(Sect. 1.1). Surface acoustic waves (SAWs) on the nanometric scale and their
quanta, surface phonons, while allowing for signal processing devices operating in
the THz domain, hold information on the structure and the interatomic forces at
solid surfaces, which generally differ from those of the solid bulk (Sect. 1.2).
Inelastic He atom scattering, as compared to other surface phonon probes, offers
convenient kinematical conditions for a high-resolution surface phonon spec-
troscopy over the complete momentum and energy spectral range (Sect. 1.3).

1.1 Surface Acoustic Waves in Nature and Technology

1.1.1 Frequency Range of Surface Acoustic Waves

More than a century ago in 1885 Lord Rayleigh demonstrated mathematically [1, 2]
that the long-wave component of earthquakes is due to elastic waves travelling
along the surface of the Earth (Fig. 1.1). His theory describes the displacement
amplitudes of waves, which are localized in the surface region of a semi-infinite
elastic continuum. They are polarized in a plane normal to the surface along the
propagation direction called the sagittal plane as shown in Fig. 1.2 [3]. Rayleigh’s
discovery is commonly taken as the starting point of surface dynamics.
Throughout nature surface waves can exist in all sorts of condensed matter
systems, from nuclei to stars, over an extremely wide range of wavelengths cov-
ering about 23 orders of magnitude (Fig. 1.3) [4–11]. Since also the speed of

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 1

G. Benedek and J. P. Toennies, Atomic Scale Dynamics at Surfaces, Springer Series
in Surface Sciences 63, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56443-1_1
2 1 Surface Dynamics, An Introduction

Fig. 1.1 Seismographic record of the earthquake which hit southern Italy in 1980 as detected
420 km away from the epicenter at the Polo Sismico “Alberto Gabriele” of the Ettore Majorana
Centre in Erice, Sicily, Italy. a The arrival times of the primary (P), secondary (S) and long-wave
(L) seismic wave components are indicated by arrows and correspond to longitudinal (LA),
transverse (TA) and Rayleigh waves (RW), respectively, in the notation of solid state physics.
b Since the LA and TA waves travel directly through the earth, practically all frequencies of the
spectrum reach the seismograph. The Rayleigh waves, however, travel along the earth’s surface.
Since the shorter wavelength components are more strongly scattered by the earth surface asperities,
only the long waves (about 14 km in the figure) reach the seismograph [Courtesy of Dr. Pino Aceto]

surface waves varies from a few tens of meters per second for sea surface waves [7]
to kilometers per second on ordinary solid surfaces [3–5], up to a substantial
fraction of the speed of light in nuclei [6]. The range of frequencies is even wider,
extending over 26 orders of magnitude.
With regard to waves traveling at the surface of solid elastic bodies, the naturally
occurring seismic waves in ordinary earthquakes are at the low frequency end with
wavelengths extending up to many kilometers (Fig. 1.1a). The detection of seismic
waves produced by nuclear explosions plays an important role in monitoring test
bans [12].
The other extreme of acoustic vibrations at short wavelengths has emerged only
rather recently. Starting from the sixties the development of interdigital transducers
in piezoelectric materials extended the frequencies from the audible region into the
ultra- and hypersound regimes, with wavelengths progressively decreasing towards
the micrometric and nanometric scales. Interdigital transducers have found many
applications and have opened up the technical development of surface acoustic
wave (SAW) based devices in delay lines, optoacoustic systems and signal pro-
cessing devices [13–18], with a wide spectrum of applications, briefly presented in
the next subsections.
1.1 Surface Acoustic Waves in Nature and Technology 3

Fig. 1.2 Schematic diagram showing the deformations at the surface and penetration associated
with a Rayleigh wave (RW) of a semi-infinite homogeneous elastic solid in the sagittal plane (from
Farnell [3]). a The displacement field has a dominant component normal to the surface. The
smaller longitudinal component has a p/2 phase shift with respect to the normal one. Together they
lead to a retrograde elliptical polarization in the sagittal plane. b Both components decay
exponentially inside the solid with a decay length proportional to the RW wavelength k, which is a
characteristic of a macroscopic surface mode

1.1.2 Surface Acoustic Wave Visualization and Surface

Characterization

About 15 years ago it became possible to visualize micrometric surface phonons

directly by means of stroboscopic X-ray diffraction: Fig. 1.4 shows an example of
the direct observation of a SAW generated in the piezoelectric material LiNbO3
with a micrometric wavelength and a frequency in the sub-GHz domain [19, 20].
Besides offering a view of a SAW, the experiment also images the alteration of the
SAW displacement pattern produced by surface defects of size and depth compa-
rable to the SAW wavelength and penetration depth. Thus defects of any extension
can be probed by SAWs of appropriate wavelength, and visualized with the tech-
nique demonstrated by Shilo et al. (Fig. 1.4) [19, 20]. Moreover, the analysis of
SAW pulse propagation has also been shown to be a sensitive tool for studying the
mechanical strength and elastic moduli of thin films [5, 21], and for testing the
porosity and the microstructure of surface coatings [22–24].
With ultra-short laser pulses in the ps to the fs time scales and the related
techniques of ultra-fast spectroscopy it has become possible to not only excite, but
also to monitor SAW’s in the THz frequency domain by means of laser pump-probe
experiments [5]. A typical pump-probe experimental configuration for SAW
studies, as reported in the review article by Hess [5], is depicted in Fig. 1.5. In one
configuration two simultaneous ps laser pulses interfere at a crystal surface thereby
generating two SAW’s propagating in opposite directions, which are detected
4 1 Surface Dynamics, An Introduction

Fig. 1.3 Surface acoustic waves cover a wide range of frequencies and wavelengths extending
from 107 m long waves involved in the helioseismology on the surface of the sun [9, 10] to 10−15
m for the vibrations on the surface of large nuclei [6]. The wavelength of ordinary Rayleigh waves
vary over about 13 orders of magnitude, from the long-wave (L) component of earthquakes (or
nuclear bomb explosions) to the interatomic distances in crystal lattices. Except for nuclei, where
collective modes travel at an appreciable fraction of the speed of light, the speed of surface waves
in all the other systems is in the same range from a few meters to kilometers per second so that the
magnitude of frequencies is inversely proportional to that of wavelengths over a wide range
(adapted from Hess [5])

through the diffraction of the probe laser beam. A similar technique has been used
by Wright and Kawashima [25] to determine the surface wave frequency spectrum
from the Fourier analysis of a time resolved pump-probe experiment in thin films of
Mo and Cr on a silica substrate.
In another experiment a ps pulse of the pump laser generates a coherent SAW,
which propagates along the surface and is monitored by a continuous probe laser
beam through Michelson interferometry. With this method ultrafast generation,
imaging and detection of coherent surface phonons emanating from a point source
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
 Fig. 32.—The demon of the South-West Wind.
Louvre. Actual size.
Drawn by Saint-Elme Gautier.
Nothing could be clearer than the governing idea of this
conception. The artist has wished to unite in a single being the
highest powers of life and nature—the bull, the lion, the eagle: these
are types of physical force differently applied. Patient and tenacious
in the bull, who drags the plough and transports the heaviest
burdens; violent and impetuous in the lion, while in the king of birds
the formidable strength of beak and talons add to the fear inspired by
his lightning flight. Finally, the head and countenance are those of a
man, the impersonation of intelligent force, of will governed by
reflection, before which every living thing has to bow.
The root of this conception is the same as that by which the
Egyptian sphinx was suggested. The chief differences lie in the
greater complexity of the winged bull and in its less quiescent
attitude. The sphinx combines but two elements, the man and the
lion; its pose is easier and perhaps more natural than that of the
Assyrian animal. It is extended on the ground, its paws stretched idly
before it, an attitude that could be preserved without fatigue for an
indefinite time, and therefore in complete accordance with its
governing idea, and with the function it had to fill at the gates of a
palace or temple. That idea, for the bull as well as the sphinx, was
force in repose. But the bull stands upright, and, when looked at from
one side, seems to walk. We feel that if he did complete his stride he
would bring the structure that stands on his loins down about our
ears.
Here, as in most cases where comparison is possible, the
advantage remains with Egypt. But yet the Assyrian type is by no
means without a certain nobility and beauty of its own. In spite of
their colossal dimensions, in spite of the supernatural vigour of their
limbs and the exaggerated energy and salience of their muscles,
there is a kind of robust grace in the leading lines and proportions of
these figures to which we cannot be indifferent, and their effect is
increased by the wings that lie along their backs and furnish so
happily the upper part of the huge alabaster slabs, above which
nothing rises but the horned tiara. Finally, the face with its strongly
marked features, with its frame of closely curled hair and beard
arranged in the strictest symmetry, is still more remarkable than all
the rest (Fig. 33). The expression is grave and proud, and
sometimes almost smiling. It is in fine harmony with the general idea
that led the Chaldæans to create these mysterious but kindly beings,
and to endow them with their mighty frames of stone.[101]
 Fig. 33.—Head of a winged bull of
Assurbanipal. British Museum. Height 38
inches.
Drawn by Saint-Elme Gautier.
These bulls have only been actually found in Assyria, but
numerous and precise texts have been deciphered by which their
existence at the gateways of Chaldæan temples and palaces has
been proved.[102] They are not now to be met with in the country of
their origin, because their material was too rare in the lower part of
the great basin to escape the attacks of spoilers. Soft or hard,
volcanic or calcareous, stone was there precious and difficult to find.
Sooner or later such objects as these would be dragged from their
ancient sites and broken up to be used anew. If chance had not so
willed that the Assyrian palaces were preserved for us by
entombment in their own ruins, we should now have known nothing
of a type that played a great part in the decoration of Mesopotamian
buildings, and, by its originality, made a great impression upon
neighbouring peoples; or at least we should only know it by
reproductions on a very small scale, like those we meet with on the
cylinders, or by imitations vastly inferior to the originals, like those of
the palaces at Persepolis.

Fig. 34.—Cone of chalcedony. In the National

Library at Paris. Actual size.
Instead of a human head on the body of a beast, we sometimes
find the process reversed, but always with an amount of taste and
reserve to which we are compelled to render due praise. We may, of
course, quote instances in which the head of an eagle is put upon a
human body (Vol. I. Fig. 8), or the shoulders of a man concealed
under a fish’s scales (Vol. I. Fig. 9, and above, Fig. 34); but even
then the sculptor has succeeded in giving to the characteristic lines
and attitudes of the human figure the predominance that belongs to
them, and, as it were, has made them cast an air of nobility over the
whole composition.
 Fig. 35.—Izdubar and lion. Double the actual size. From a
cylinder in the British Museum.
It is thus with a curious type to which our reader’s attention
should be drawn; we mean that of the personage called Izdubar by
some Assyriologists, and Hea-bani by others. Whichever name we
may choose, the person in question was “a mighty hunter,” like the
Nimrod of Genesis, a hero distinguished for his valour and for the
difficulties he overcame. So that he might be free in his movements
and ready for every work of activity and vigour, he is naked. Even
under the dry method of the Chaldæan gem engraver we can
appreciate the amplitude of his form and the power of his muscles.
He is also distinguished by the size of his face, which is always fully
seen, and seems to be the result of a compromise between the
features of a man and those of a lion. This deliberately exaggerated
head is enframed in long shaggy hair. Upon some cylinders we see
Izdubar in a state of repose, behind the throne of a god to whom he
acts as acolyte or guard of honour (Vol. I., Fig. 17), elsewhere he is
seen in the exercise of his functions, if we may call them so,
accomplishing some such task as those that made the fame of the
Greek Hercules, whose ancestor he may perhaps have been. We
find him on a cylinder in the British Museum carrying off a slain lion
on his shoulders (Fig. 35).

Fig. 36.—Winged genius. Louvre. Height 10 feet.

Drawn by Saint-Elme Gautier.
 We again find the human form predominant in those great winged
genii for which Chaldæan art had so strong a predilection (Figs. 4
and 29). The two pairs of wings are very happily allied to the body,
and both Greek and modern art has had recourse to the type thus
created, the former for the figures of certain minor divinities,
especially for that of Victory, and Christian art for its angels. In both
these instances, however, we find but a single pair of wings. The
artists of Assyria, especially in their rare attempts to treat the figure
from a front view, have used the two pairs of wings with great felicity
to furnish the background, against which the human form stands out
in all the vigour of its robust muscularity. Our readers may judge of
this from our reproduction of one of the reliefs brought to the Louvre
from Khorsabad (Fig. 36).
These winged men serve as a kind of transition between the
complex beings noticed above, and the sculptures in which the
human form is treated without any supernatural additions. So far as
we can guess in our present uncertainty as to the ranks of the
celestial hierarchy of Chaldæa, it would appear that the forms and
features of men and women were alone thought worthy to represent
the greatest of their divinities. Take the statue of Nebo, figured on
page 81 of our last volume, take the gods introduced into the
ceremonies we have already figured (Vol. I., Figs. 13 and 14), after
reliefs from Nimroud and Kouyundjik (Fig. 37).[103] In this last-named
work the god, Raman or Marduk, holds a flower. At Nimroud there is
a god with horned forehead who grasps an axe in one hand and a
thunderbolt in the other. In the female figure, twice repeated with
slightly different attributes, that precedes the god, Istar has been
recognized. See also the statue of Istar in Vol. I., Fig. 16, and the
image of that Chaldæan Venus so often repeated on the cylinders
(Figs. 38 and 39). In form Istar is but a woman, and the artist would
have made her beautiful if he had known how. She is shown naked,
against the general custom of an art that everywhere else hid the
human body under ample draperies. This nudity must have been
intended to suggest those feminine charms by which desire is
awakened and life preserved on the world.
Fig. 37.—Carrying the gods. From the palace of Sennacherib; from Layard.

Fig. 38.—Istar and the sacrificing priest.

 Fig. 39.—Istar between two personages.
Hague Museum.
The supreme gods, the Bels or Lords, were treated in the same
way when all the majesty of their station had to be suggested. Each
of these had his domicile in one of the principal sanctuaries of
Chaldæa and Syria. At Sippara it was Samas, or the sun personified
(Vol. I., Fig. 71); upon the seal of Ourkam (Vol. I., Fig. 3), upon
another cylinder on which there are many curious and inexplicable
details (Fig. 17), and upon a last monument of the same kind which
dates from the early centuries of Chaldæan civilization (Fig. 40), it is
a Bel whose name escapes us;[104] but in all the theme is the same,
and the type almost exactly similar. We can hardly be mistaken in
recognizing a god in the personage seated on a richly decorated
throne, towards whom two or three figures, sometimes of smaller
size than himself, advance in an attitude of respectful homage. He is
crowned with a lofty tiara, a long beard flows over his breast, a robe
of fine plaited stuff enwraps his whole body and falls to his feet. He is
a man in the prime of life; his air and costume must have been taken
from those of the king. May we not look upon him as the first sketch
for the Greek Zeus, the Zeus of Homer and Phidias?
 This type is never disfigured by any of those attempts, of which
the Chaldæans were so fond, to add to the significance of the human
figure by endowing it with features borrowed from various lower
animals. It should be noticed, however, that on one of the cylinders
we have figured (Vol. I., Fig. 17) there is a personage with two faces,
like the Roman Janus. But this is not the seated god. It is not the
great deity before whom the other actors in the scene stand erect, it
is one of the secondary personages, one of the inferior divinities who
bring offerings or receive instructions, in short, one of those genii
whose numerous and complex attributes first suggested these
fantastic combinations.

Fig. 40.—Lapis-lazuli cylinder. In the French National Library.

We find then that when the Chaldæans set themselves to search
for the most suitable way of figuring their gods, they ended by
thoroughly appreciating the excellence of the human form; with a few
exceptions, they abandoned the idea of correcting and perfecting it;
they were content to copy it sincerely and unaffectedly, to render the
characteristic features of the maid and the mother, the youth and the
man of mature age to whom years have lent dignity without taking
away vitality. These forms they covered as a rule with ample drapery,
but for certain types, those, for instance, of the goddess of love and
fecundity, and the demi-god whom we have compared to the Greek
Hercules, they had recourse to all the frankness of nudity. How was
it that under such conditions they never succeeded in endowing their
goddesses with grace, or their gods with nobility of form? Can it be
denied that the few nude figures they have left us are far inferior, not
only to those the Greeks were afterwards to design with so sure a
hand, but even to the hundreds and thousands of human forms with
which the Egyptians had already peopled their bas-reliefs and
funerary pictures?

Figs. 41, 42.—Fragments of an ivory statuette.

British Museum. Actual size.
Their first fault lay in an exaggerated striving after fidelity. They
insisted blindly on certain details which are elsewhere suppressed or
dissimulated, in obedience to a compromise which has been so
generally accepted that it must surely be founded on reason. We
may judge of this by two ivory fragments chosen from among those
that were found in such numbers at Nimroud. They are, in all
probability, statuettes of Istar (Figs. 41 and 42). The sculptor had
noticed that the female pelvis was larger than the male, but he
exaggerates its size and that of the bosom. The deep folds of the
abdomen indicate an exhausted vitality, that of a woman who has
been many times a mother, and other details of this region are
rendered with a clumsy insistance.[105]
There is no evidence in Chaldæan art of the feeling for proportion
which distinguishes Egyptian sculpture. Its renderings of the human
figure are nearly always too short and thickset; even those works
which by their general facility and justness of movement most
strongly attract our admiration, are not free from this fault. Its effects
may be estimated very clearly from the stele representing Marduk-
idin-akhi, a king of Babylon (Fig. 43), whose date is placed in about
the twelfth century b.c. It is true that the defect in question is more
conspicuous in this relief than, perhaps, in any other work of the
school to which we can point; but in all it is more or less perceptible.
In Assyria, under the later Sargonids, sculptors made an effort to
correct it, but even their comparatively slender figures have a certain
heaviness. Assyrian sculpture has many good points, but it is never
elegant. The Assyrian and Chaldæan sculptors were discouraged
from acquiring a complete knowledge of the human form by the fact
that it was not demanded by their patrons. The public who judged
their works did not perceive their shortcomings in that respect. There
was nothing in their daily life, or in the requirements they laboured to
fulfil, which either assisted them to make good their deficiencies, or
compelled them to do it for themselves. They seldom beheld the
nude form, still more seldom did they have to introduce it into their
works. The Greek writers speak of it as a peculiarity of “the
barbarians,” whether Syrians or Chaldæans, Lydians or Persians,
that they were ashamed to be seen naked, the men as much as the
women. Such a scruple, especially in the male, would seem hardly
comprehensible to the Greek accustomed to the nudity of the
gymnasium.[106]
The origin of such a notion is to be sought, perhaps, so far as
Mesopotamia is concerned, in a wise hygiene and in the rapid
changes of an uncertain climate. The difference between the
extremes of summer and winter temperature is far greater than in
Egypt or on the Ionian coasts, and precautions had to be taken at
one time against a scorching sun, at another against the cold of the
nights. However this may have been, it is certain that these people,
although they lived in a hot country, went about in a costume that
covered their bodies as completely as that of modern Europe. It
consisted of a long tunic, a tunica talaria (?) as the Romans would
call it, and a mantle. The tunic left nothing exposed but the head and
neck, the forearms, and the feet and ankles. It must have been of
linen or hempen cloth;[107] when worn by a rich man it was
embroidered and decorated about the foot with a sort of gimp fringe.
The tunics of the poor were short and plain, often coming hardly
lower than the knee. They were also looser and better fitted to work
in; but they are never wanting altogether, even to the men of the
corvée, the slaves and prisoners of war whom we see employed in
the construction of the royal buildings (Vol. I. Figs. 151 and 152).
Women were dressed in chemises coming down to their feet (Vol. I.
Fig. 30), resembling the long robe of coarse blue cotton which still
forms the only garment of the peasant women of Egypt and Syria.
Sometimes we find a sort of cape thrown over the tunic (Vol. I. Fig.
31, and below, Fig. 44).
 Fig. 43.—Merodach or Marduk-idin-akhi. From a basalt stele in the
British Museum. Height 24 inches. Drawn by Saint-Elme Gautier.
As for the mantle, it was a fringed shawl, and, like the Greek
peplos or the Roman toga, could be arranged in many different
ways. In the painting at Beni-Hassan which shows us the arrival in
Egypt of a band of Asiatic emigrants,[108] it leaves one shoulder and
both arms uncovered, and forms a kind of frock round the body,
which it entirely conceals. In the old Chaldæan statues from Sirtella
the arrangement is more graceful (see Plate VI.); the piece of cloth is
folded double and carried obliquely round the body so as to cover
the left arm and shoulder and leave the right bare. The end is simply
passed under the first fold, by which it is tightly held.[109] There is no
trace of a tunic. In Assyria the mantle was variously arranged. It
always left one shoulder free, which was covered, however, by the
tunic. As a rule it reached to the feet (Vol. I. Fig. 22), but sometimes
it was so contrived as to leave one leg exposed from the knee
downwards. The robes of Sargon praying before the sacred tree are
thus arranged (Fig. 45).

Fig. 44.—Captives on the march. From the palace of Sennacherib.

As for the women’s dress, it was still more impenetrable than that
of the men. In the Assyrian bas-reliefs there are very few figures of
women on any considerable scale. We can hardly point to an
instance, except in the slab where Assurbanipal and his queen are
shown feasting in a garden (Vol. I. Fig. 28). In this carved picture the
queen is robed in a tunic and mantle, over which the embroiderers
needle has thrown a profusion of those rosettes that are so popular
in Mesopotamia!! art. We are allowed to glean no hint of the personal
charms of the favoured sultana, who must have been young and
beautiful. They are entirely masked by the envelope in which she is
wrapped.
In all this we are far enough from the semi-nudity of the Egyptian
sculptures, to say nothing of the frank display of the Greeks. On the
banks of the Nile, where the climate had no violent changes and the
air was deliciously dry and limpid, both poor and rich, both the king
and his subjects, were contented with the white drawers, which were
carefully plaited and knotted about the hips. On great occasions,
when, as we should say, they wished to dress themselves, they put
on long, bright-coloured, and elegantly embroidered robes; but those
robes were of a fine linen tissue, every contour of the body could be
easily followed through them, the age and character of every form
could be distinctly appreciated.
The artist, even when he had to represent the wives and
daughters of Pharaoh or the most august of the female deities,
showed under their draperies the contours of their breasts, their hips,
and the insertions of their limbs.[110] Still more transparent were the
robes in which the dancing and singing women who occur so often in
the tomb pictures were draped.[111] The calculated indiscretions of
this sort of coa vestis invited the painter and sculptor to do justice to
the elegance of the female form.
How different and how much less favourable were the conditions
under which the Assyrian sculptor exercised his art! For him the
contours of the body and the attachments of the limbs were hidden
behind heavy tunics covered with embroidery, and shawls often
folded double. If by chance he caught a passing glimpse of the forms
beneath, to what use could he put it? Two or three at the most of the
divine types upon which his skill was most frequently employed
involved a very partial nudity; most of the gods, and nearly all the
men, were draped. In a few very rare instances we find an Assyrian
stripped of his clothes and crossing a river by means of an inflated
skin.[112] But these figures, though fairly well drawn, are very small in
scale, and occupy but a subordinate place in the bas-relief where
they occur.[113]
 Fig. 45.—Sargon before the sacred tree. Louvre. Drawn by
Saint-Elme Gautier.
Corpses stripped naked by the victor on the battle-field are of
more frequent occurrence; but these, being the bodies of despised
and hated enemies, are treated in very summary fashion.[114] We
may say the same of the prisoners whom they behead and flay alive.
[115] The mutilated statue of a nude female, rather less than life,
which bears a votive inscription of Assurbilkala, the son of Tiglath-
Pileser, and is now in the British Museum, is a great rarity. It is
believed to represent Istar. The execution is careful, but the forms
are clumsy and the proportions bad; the bust is a great deal too
short.[116]
By his failure to appreciate living form for its own sake, for its
beauty of line and harmony of proportion, the Mesopotamian sculptor
put a voluntary limit to his ambition. He renounced, in advance, the
only means within his reach of borrowing from the human figure the
elements for a representation of the deity which should preserve a
character of indefinite existence, of natural and sovereign
excellence. But this abstention, or, if you like, this impotence, did not
prevent Assyrian artists from fulfilling, in the most brilliant fashion,
the other part of the task to which they were called by the habits and
requirements of the society for which they laboured. The sculptors
were mainly employed by the king; their chief business was to
multiply his images; they were charged to commemorate the
sovereign in every act of his life, in every one of the many parts
involved by his indefatigable activity as builder, chief-justice, hunter,
commander-in-chief, and supreme pontiff. From the king himself to
the last of his soldiers or prisoners, every one who had his own
marked place in a picture was draped; the sculptor could reproduce
every episode of the royal life in the truest and most animated
fashion, without ever having learnt to draw the nude. In fact, he was
not called upon, like the Greek artist, to procure for the æsthetic
sense the pure joys that are given by the sight of noble forms or
movements well rendered; his duty was to commemorate by a series
of clear and lively images those events that were celebrated in words
in the text inscribed upon the very alabaster slabs beneath his hand.
Assyrian sculpture had this documentary character in the very
highest degree; its creations, in the intention of those by whom they
were commissioned, were less works of art than records.[117] The
long inscriptions and the endless series of pictures with which the
palace walls were covered were no more than an illustrated book.
And in what class of literature should that book be placed? It has
been called an epic illustrated by sculptors—a description that
seems hardly just. For in every epic worthy of the name the
marvellous occupies an important place, while in these reliefs it
scarcely has a place at all. With few exceptions the belief in a
superior and divine world makes itself felt in Assyrian art only in
those effigies of gods and demons we have already described. And
such images have their places rigidly fixed by tradition; they stand at
the palace gates, but are scarcely ever found within its saloons, and
are entirely absent from the marches, battles, and sieges. Here and
there among such pictures, but at long intervals, we find some
feature that reminds us of the aid that Assur and the other national
gods afforded their worshippers; now it is an eagle floating over the
king’s chariot;[118] now the god himself, surrounded by a winged
circle, draws his bow and launches his formidable shafts against the
enemies of his people.[119] He is thus represented mounted on a
galloping bull in the ring by which the standards of the Assyrian
legions were surmounted.

Fig. 46.—Assyrian standard; from

Layard.
All these details were small in scale and unobtrusive. The rôle
played by the architect was similar to that of the draughtsmen and
photographers who sometimes accompany princes and generals on
a modern campaign. The programme placed before him was as
narrow as it could well be; he was required to be faithful and precise,
not to give proof of inventive power.
The sculptor was, in a way, the editor of the military bulletins; his
work was the newspaper of the day, explaining the political events of
his time to those who could understand no other writing. There is
complete coherence between his figures and the inscribed texts they
accompany. Look, for instance, at the series of slabs from the Palace
of Sennacherib, in which his Jewish campaign is retraced.[120] The
final scene is thus described in words within a cartouche above the
heads of the figures: “Sennacherib, king of Assyria, seated upon his
throne of state, causes the prisoners taken in the town of Lachish to
pass before him,”[121] In order to show the details of the magnificent
chair upon which the king is seated we have reproduced only the two
principal actors, in the sovereign and his grand vizier (Fig. 47). If we
had been able to place the whole composition before our readers
they would have seen how thoroughly the inscription describes it.
Behind the general who is presenting the vanquished to the king,
appear the prisoners, some prostrate, others kneeling or standing
upright, but all turned towards their conqueror with gestures of
supplication.
The spaces to be covered were vast, but the warlike kings of
Assyria cut out enough work for their sculptors to keep them always
busy. Every campaign, and every battle, every siege or passage of a
river, seemed to them worthy of commemoration by the chisel.
Those to whom the work was given were forced therefore to multiply
figures; the task was complicated and yet had to be finished with
extreme rapidity. The sovereign was in a hurry to enjoy the spectacle
he had promised himself, he wished to inhabit for as many years as
possible the dwelling whose walls, like so many magic mirrors, would
reflect his own prowess and glory. And so the sculptor had to
produce much and produce fast; we can therefore understand how it
was that his creations never lost a certain look of improvisation. They
had the good qualities of such a mode of work; namely, force, vitality,
and abandon, but combined with all its defects, inequality,
incoherence, and frequent repetition.
In order to cover the surface abandoned to the sculptor as quickly
as possible, the work had to be divided; every one who was thought
to be capable of wielding a chisel had to be pressed into the service.
Sculptors of established fame who had already helped to decorate
more than one palace, mediocre artists with more age and
experience than talent, young apprentices entering the workshops
for the first time, all were enlisted, and each received his share of the