Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Economic Inequality Neoliberalism and The American Community College 1St Edition Patrick Sullivan Auth Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Economic Inequality Neoliberalism and The American Community College 1St Edition Patrick Sullivan Auth Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/social-inequality-economic-
decline-and-plutocracy-an-american-crisis-1st-edition-dale-l-
johnson-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/college-algebra-enhanced-with-
graphing-utilities-7th-edition-sullivan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/neoliberalism-economic-
radicalism-and-the-normalization-of-violence-1st-edition-vicente-
berdayes/
Economic Integration and Regional Development: The
ASEAN Economic Community 1st Edition Kiyoshi Kobayashi
https://textbookfull.com/product/economic-integration-and-
regional-development-the-asean-economic-community-1st-edition-
kiyoshi-kobayashi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/southeast-asia-and-the-asean-
economic-community-roderick-macdonald/
https://textbookfull.com/product/muslim-students-education-and-
neoliberalism-schooling-a-suspect-community-1st-edition-mairtin-
mac-an-ghaill/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cities-and-citadels-an-
archaeology-of-inequality-and-economic-growth-1st-edition-adam-s-
green/
https://textbookfull.com/product/marriage-markets-how-inequality-
is-remaking-the-american-family-1st-edition-june-carbone/
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY,
NEOLIBERALISM,
and the AMERICAN
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Patrick Sullivan
Economic Inequality, Neoliberalism, and the
American Community College
Patrick Sullivan
Economic Inequality,
Neoliberalism, and
the American
Community College
Patrick Sullivan
Manchester Community College
Manchester, Connecticut, USA
v
ma già volgeva il mio disio e ’l velle
sì come rota ch’igualmente è mossa,
l’amor che move il sole e l’altre stelle.
but my desire and will were moved already—
like a wheel revolving uniformly—by
the Love that moves the sun and the other stars.
—Dante, Paradiso 33.143–45
*****
To
Susan,
Bonnie Rose,
Nicholas,
and Marigold Hope
—my sun and stars
American colleges and universities must envision a much larger role for
higher education in the national life. They can no longer consider them-
selves merely the instrument for producing an intellectual elite; they must
become the means by which every citizen, youth, and adult is enabled and
encouraged to carry his education, formal and informal, as far as his native
capacities permit.
ix
Acknowledgments
The rich nations must use their vast resources of wealth to develop the under-
developed, school the unschooled, and feed the unfed. Ultimately a great
nation is a compassionate nation. No individual or nation can be great if it
does not have a concern for “the least of these.” Deeply etched in the fiber
of our religious tradition is the conviction that men are made in the image
of God and that they are souls of infinite metaphysical value, the heirs of a
legacy of dignity and worth. If we feel this as a profound moral fact, we can-
not be content to see men hungry, to see men victimized with starvation and
ill health when we have the means to help them.
There are many ways that individuals can be hungry. If a great nation is
a compassionate nation, we cannot be content to have adult Americans
living lives without hope or promise. Especially with the disappearance of
work that pays a living wage in America (Greenhouse; Kalleberg; Shipler;
Weil; Wilson), the community college must play an important role in
engaging this essential public work in America today. At its most basic,
this work is part of our ongoing national efforts to promote equity and
social justice (Ignatieff; Rawls; Sen Development; Sen Idea).
This book, though humble, was made with great joyfulness and love,
and it has benefitted tremendously from the help of many. It is with s incere
xi
xii Acknowledgments
gratitude that I offer these brief words of thanks to the people who have
helped make it possible.
This book would not have been possible without the generous support
of my home institution, Manchester Community College, and the sab-
batical leave I was granted in the fall of 2015. A significant portion of this
book was completed during that time. I am deeply indebted to the college
for this time to research and write. I am deeply thankful for the college’s
enthusiastic support of my work.
My heartfelt thanks to the editorial team at Palgrave Macmillan, espe-
cially Mara Berkoff and Milana Vernikova. A special thank you to Palgrave
Macmillan for believing in this project and believing in the value of com-
munity colleges. I also wish to extend my deep thanks to the anonymous
reviewers at Palgrave for the excellent feedback and constructive criticism
they provided to me throughout the process of writing and revising this
book. Your feedback was invaluable to me.
I am indebted to my colleagues at Manchester Community College,
where I have taught now for many years. I would especially like to
thank my colleagues in the English Department. You are an inspiration
to me every day.
I would also like to thank my close friends and colleagues Andrew
Paterna, Gena Glickman, George Ducharme, Pat Beeman, David Nielsen,
Duncan Harris, Ed Hogan, Lois Ryan, Steve Straight, David Caldwell,
Wanda Haynes, Bettylou Sandy, Lucy Hurston, Brenda St. Peter, Julie
and Wes Larkin, Michelle and Jeanne Nickerson, Keri Renner, Mike
Bogdanski, Kristin Duethorn, Griz, and David Salisbury.
A special word of gratitude to Dan, Dennis, and Molly—extended fam-
ily members who I hold close in my heart.
I also wish to extend my heartfelt thanks to my great teachers at Mohegan
Community College in Norwich, Connecticut, where this journey began
many lifetimes ago, especially Jim Coleman, Jim Wright, and John Perch. A
special thank you to John Basinger, my lifelong friend and mentor.
Thank you to my inspiring friends and colleagues in the profession
affiliated with The National Council of Teachers of English and The Two-
Year College English Association, including Howard Tinberg, Sheridan
Blau, Jeff Sommers, Christie Toth, Darin Jensen, Carolyn Calhoon-
Dillahunt, Holly Hassel, Joanne Baird Giordano, Cheryl Hogue Smith,
Jason Courtmanche, Amanda Greenwell, Jessyka Scoppetta, John Pekins,
Mariolina Salvatori, Patricia Donahue, Mark Reynolds, Hope Parisi,
Cheryl C. Smith, Kathi Yancey, Muriel Harris, Alfredo Lujan, Ellen Carillo,
Acknowledgments xiii
John Schilb, Kelly Ritter, Leslie Roberts, Jody Millward, Sterling Warner,
Lois Powers, Lawrence McDoniel, Jeffrey Klausman, Frost McLaughlin,
Miriam Moore, Yufeng Zhang, Jonathan Alexander, and Christine Vassett.
I would also like to thank my amazing students, especially my English
93 and English 9000 students, who have taught me so much.
I offer my deepest thanks to those I have lost who would have been
delighted by this book. These include my mother and father, Barbara and
Donald Sullivan. And my lifelong friend and mentor, Victor Kaplan, a
writer and professor of English at Eastern Connecticut State University.
And finally I offer my deepest thanks to my wife, Susan, and my chil-
dren, Bonnie Rose and Nicholas, without whom none of this would have
been possible. And to my granddaughter, Marigold Hope, who is a bless-
ing every day.
I am, of course, what time, circumstance, and history have made of me,
but I am also, thanks to all of you, much more than that. Words cannot
adequately express the debt of gratitude I feel for the many gifts you have
given me over these many years.
Contents
1 Introduction 1
Part I Journeys 15
xv
xvi Contents
21 Unfreedom 177
22 Opportunity Differentials 195
28 Development as Freedom 311
Bibliography 399
Index 427
About the Author
xxi
List of Figures
xxiii
xxiv List of Figures
Introduction
American colleges and universities must envision a much larger role for
higher education in the national life. They can no longer consider them-
selves merely the instrument for producing an intellectual elite; they must
become the means by which every citizen, youth, and adult is enabled and
encouraged to carry his education, formal and informal, as far as his native
capacities permit.
This conception is the inevitable consequence of the democratic faith;
universal education is indispensable to the full and living realization of the
democratic ideal. No society can long remain free unless its members are
freemen, and men are not free where ignorance prevails. No more in mind
than in body can this Nation or any endure half slave, half free. Education
that liberates and ennobles must be made equally available to all. Justice to
the individual demands this; the safety and progress of the Nation depend
upon it. America cannot afford to let any of its potential human resources
go undiscovered and undeveloped. (101)
Sixty-five years into this grand experiment, the community college has
become central to America’s system of higher education, serving millions
of students across the nation. As the authors of a recent Two-Year College
English Association document note, community colleges now “enroll the
majority of African-American, Latino, and Native American college stu-
dents in addition to returning adult students, dual-enrolled high school
students, multilingual and ‘Generation 1.5’ students, veterans, and stu-
dents with disabilities” (Calhoon-Dillahunt, Jensen, Johnson, Tinberg,
and Toth). Despite significant and demonstrable success across a broad
range of indicators, there remains much confusion and misunderstanding
about the community college. This book seeks to address these misunder-
standings systematically and methodically.
Following psychologists Edward E. Jones and Richard E. Nisbett’s
landmark work on perception, I have attempted to explore in this book
what we might have to gain by adopting an “actor’s perspective” of the
community college, rather than an “observer’s perspective.” In so doing,
I seek to move our scholarly conversation beyond a purely statistical
model of the community college in order to promote a more qualita-
tive, “student-present” (Bishop 199) understanding of this institution.
There is much that we can gain from listening to students themselves as
they discuss what the community college and its open door policy has
meant to them. Here we will learn about students’ goals and family his-
tories, and their ideas about education and democracy. In engaging this
important qualitative work, we will be privileging a theory of the commu-
nity college that seeks to be fundamentally informed, to borrow a phrase
from economist Amartya Sen, by the lives that people actually “manage—
or do not manage—to live” (Idea 18; Development 142–145). Following
Sen, we will also be formulating a “freedom-centered” understanding of
the community college and the nature of the social justice in America
that is “very much an agent-oriented view” (Development 11). In some
ways, following Ellen Langer’s work on mindfulness, it appears that we
have become “trapped by categories” (11–12) in our understanding of
the community college and victims of “acting from a single perspective”
(16–18). Our reliance on the statistical model of success developed by
INTRODUCTION 3
“Student-Present” Research
This book features a unique combination of data and research about com-
munity colleges and provides an innovative approach for assessing the
value of community colleges in America. This book also provides a coun-
ter-narrative to the deficit models of community colleges currently enjoy-
ing a renaissance now in our legislatures and in much current scholarship
devoted to community colleges. Much of what is currently written about
student aspirations and community colleges is misleading and misguided—
often the result of a deep unfamiliarity with these institutions and the stu-
dents they serve.
Part I of this book features a selection of student-authored essays from
The Community College Success Stories Project, a research project I began
in 2015 to draw attention to the good work being done at America’s com-
munity colleges. This project features essays at an online website written
by community college students about their journeys to and from open
admissions institutions. We are currently in the beginning stages of imple-
menting this project, but it is my hope that eventually this website will
include essays written by students from across the nation. This project
received a Conference on College Composition and Communication
(CCCC) Research Initiative Grant in 2016, from my professional organi-
zation, the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE). This project
has been established to document and preserve for the reading public the
many remarkable life stories that are created every day at our nation’s com-
munity colleges.
The website is located here:
http://www.communitycollegesuccessstories.org/
The primary goal of The Community College Success Stories Project
is very simple: To build an archive of thousands of community college
success stories that can be searched and accessed by new community col-
lege students looking for inspiration and that can serve as a resource for
scholars and researchers seeking qualitative data about students who have
attended open admissions institutions.
4 P. SULLIVAN
In some important ways, these stories are all literacy narratives of one
sort or another, documenting student achievement across a variety of
cultural contexts, academic disciplines, and life trajectories. This project
privileges writing by college students themselves and therefore provides
a unique, personal, and rare glimpse into the kinds of lives being lived by
community college students in America.
We see in these artifacts accounts of college life not often studied by edu-
cational researchers. It is my hope that this archive of essays (and the small
sample of student essays featured in this book) will help readers develop a
more informed, sympathetic, and personal understanding of community
colleges and the students who attend them. In so doing, I am attempt-
ing to reshape our understanding of the modern community college and
tell a more complete story about our ongoing efforts to democratize the
system of higher education in America. These stories will add evidence
to our ongoing discussion that has not been provided before—students
telling their own stories and speaking directly to scholars, researchers,
and policymakers about their experiences at open admissions institu-
tions. Here I am drawing on the work of Susanmarie Harrington, Wendy
Bishop, and Carole Center, who have called for more scholarship that is,
to use Bishop’s phrase, “student-present” (199). This book is an attempt
to honor that call. Harrington defines this type of research as devoting
“serious attention to student voices”: “In student-present scholarship, the
focus is on how students experience broad curricular trends” (96–97).
I also seek to help further Sheryl Fontaine and Susan Hunter’s work by
helping students “write themselves into the story” we are in the process
of creating in America about community colleges. My approach here also
seeks to support the work of Nobel Laureate Svetlana Alexievich and her
commitment to privileging listening as a form of research and knowledge-
making—and from this process, forging a new “genre where human voices
speak for themselves,” telling stories that “are impossible to imagine or
invent” (Voices from Big Utopia; see also Voices from Chernobyl).
In sharing these stories, I also seek to help document the history of
the community college and to capture some of the powerful emotions
and uniquely American life stories that pulse beneath the surface of the
statistics and graduation rates that have too often been asked to speak for
these institutions. In embracing this as an important form of qualitative
research, we are privileging the value of listening as a path to wisdom, fol-
lowing Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.: “It is the province of knowledge to
speak, and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.”
INTRODUCTION 5
Parts II and III of this book examine the economic model that is driv-
ing much of the discussion in higher education today—neoliberalism.
There is a great deal to discuss here, including a variety of largely invisible
forces that help shape the lives of many community college students. The
chapters in this section of the book seek to make visible these power-
ful and often unacknowledged contingencies. In these chapters, I seek to
assess the community college’s contributions to promoting equity, social
justice, and the public good in America. This has long been a controver-
sial subject, and I seek to engage it carefully, bringing new evidence and a
fresh perspective to this long-standing debate in the scholarship devoted
to the community college.
I position my work here as a seasoned community college teacher and as
a scholar with a deep commitment to the community college and to issues
related to social justice. I have taught English at my home institution
in Connecticut, an open admissions community college in Manchester,
Connecticut, for almost 30 years. I have also devoted a significant portion
of this time to teaching developmental reading and writing classes, so I
am therefore very familiar with the controversies that have accompanied
developmental education over the years.
The need to write this book comes from my dissatisfaction with cur-
rent scholarly treatments of the community college. To my mind, most
academic scholarship devoted to this subject misses what is transforma-
tive and revolutionary about this great American institution. In this book,
I seek to theorize a more balanced, broadly research-based, progressive
understanding of America’s community colleges.
This book seeks to build on and advance the work of scholars like
Mike Rose (Back to School), Marilyn Sternglass (Time to Know Them),
Mina P. Shaughnessy (Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of
Basic Writing), Nell Ann Pickett (“The Two-Year College as Democracy
in Action”), John S. Levin (Nontraditional Students and Community
Colleges: The Conflict of Justice and Neoliberalism), John S. Levin and
Susan T. Kater (Understanding Community Colleges), and Edward St.
John, Shouping Hu, and Amy S. Fisher (Breaking Through the Access
Barrier: How Academic Capital Formation Can Improve Policy in Higher
Education) who have all championed the community college. My goal is
to promote progressive thinking about—and provide scholarly support
for progressive legislation designed to strengthen—the American com-
munity college.
6 P. SULLIVAN
1989: Brint, Steven, and Jerome Karabel. The Diverted Dream: Community
Colleges and the Promise of Educational Opportunity in America,
1900–1985. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.
1991. Dougherty, Kevin. “The Community College at the Crossroads:
The Need for Structural Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 61.3
(1991): 311–37.
1994. Traub, James. City on a Hill: Testing the American Dream at City
College. New York: Da Capo, 1994.
1995: Rouse, Cecilia Elena. “Democratization or Diversion? The Effect of
Community Colleges on Educational Attainment.” Journal of Business
& Economic Statistics 13.2 (1995): 217–224.
2001: Dougherty, Kevin J. The Contradictory College: The Conflicting
Origins, Impacts, and Futures of the Community College. Albany, SUNY
Press, 2001.
2011: Beach, J. M. Gateway to Opportunity? A History of the Community
College in the United States. Sterling: Stylus, 2011.
2011. Flores, Roy. “False Hope” Inside Higher Ed, February 17, 2011.
2012. Complete College America. Remediation: Higher Education’s
Bridge to Nowhere. Washington: Complete College America, 2012.
2014: Scherer, Juliet Lilledahl, and Mirra Leigh Anson. Community
Colleges and the Access Effect: Why Open Admissions Suppresses
Achievement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
2015: Bailey, Thomas R., Shanna Smith Jaggers, and Davis Jenkins.
Redesigning America’s Community Colleges: A Clearer Path to Student
Success. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
This book seeks to help illustrate this claim by carefully documenting the
operation of very powerful social factors—including family income, inher-
ited wealth, and social class—that create extreme opportunity differentials
for individuals in America. Following Bourdieu, I seek to illustrate that
every moment is not “perfectly independent of the previous one,” that
not “every soldier has a marshal’s baton in his knapsack,” and that the
social world is constructed in a way that not “every prize can be attained,
instantaneously, by everyone, so that at each moment anyone can become
anything.”
This understanding of the social world and the operation of various
forms of capital has vitally important implications for those who make
decisions about community colleges and developmental education pro-
grams. Neoliberal ideas about the public good and the power of the
market economy have often been used to simplify these very complex eco-
nomic realities. As P.L. Thomas has observed, this ascendant neoliberal
economic model has, in fact, produced two competing narratives about
public education in America:
“No Excuses” Reformers insist that the source of success and failure lies in
each child and each teacher, requiring only the adequate level of effort to
rise out of the circumstances not of her/his making. As well, “No Excuses”
Reformers remain committed to addressing poverty solely or primarily
through education, viewed as an opportunity offered each child and within
which … effort will result in success.
Social Context Reformers have concluded that the source of success and
failure lies primarily in the social and political forces that govern our lives.
By acknowledging social privilege and inequality, Social Context Reformers
are calling for education reform within a larger plan to reform social ineq-
uity—such as access to health care, food security, higher employment along
with better wages and job security. (qtd. in Porfilio, Gorlewski, Carr, and
Thomas 1)
The main lesson which the true liberal must learn from the success of the
socialists is that it was their courage to be Utopian which gained them the
support of the intellectuals and therefore an influence on public opinion
which is daily making possible what only recently seemed utterly remote.
Those who have concerned themselves exclusively with what seemed prac-
ticable in the existing state of opinion have constantly found that even this
had rapidly become politically impossible as the result of changes in a public
opinion which they have done nothing to guide. Unless we can make the
philosophic foundations of a free society once more a living intellectual issue,
and its implementation a task which challenges the ingenuity and imagina-
tion of our liveliest minds, the prospects of freedom are indeed dark. But if
we can regain that belief in the power of ideas which was the mark of liberal-
ism at its greatest, the battle is not lost. The intellectual revival of liberalism
is already underway in many parts of the world. Will it be in time? (237)
Those who care about social justice must embrace the responsibility to
help shape public opinion about the nature of the American community
college and the many social and civic benefits of higher education. This
work can be informed by the power of our ideals—access, opportunity,
and the public good—and by translating our research and scholarship for
a new generation of Americans. This book is designed to help move this
important work forward.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
lesion is in the cerebellum, so that, if continuous, it is not likely to
mean that anything worse is coming. It has been said to be strongly
significant if occurring without the digestive derangements or
circulatory disturbances likely to cause it, and be unconnected with
disease of the ear. Unfortunately for diagnosis, but fortunately for the
patients, the so-called vertigo a stomacho læso, may arise in cases
where the stomach trouble is very difficult or impossible to detect,
and it often continues for weeks or months after the most careful
regulation of the diet, and yet is followed by no cerebral lesion.
Although a vertigo for which every other cause can be excluded
certainly justifies a suspicion of cerebral trouble, the tendency to
exaggerate its prognostic importance should not be encouraged by
the physician, as it may exist a long time, and disappear without
another sign of the catastrophe which has been keeping the patient
in dread.
The sources whence cerebral emboli may spring are various, but
cannot be found outside a certain range. They may, in the first place,
be torn off from vegetations upon either the mitral or aortic valves;
and this source is probably the most common. The appendix of the
left auricle may furnish a plug from the thrombi formed among its
trabeculæ, or the aorta from an aneurism or from parietal thrombi
formed, upon spots roughened by atheroma. The pulmonary veins
are occasionally the source of the embolus, though this is not very
common.
It is rather doubtful whether an embolus can find its way from the
systemic veins through the lungs to the brain, but it is possible that
small emboli may do so, and increase in size from the addition of
fresh fibrin when floating in the blood-current. The occurrence of
pyæmic abscesses in the brain would suggest the possibility of this,
though it is, on the other hand, possible that the brain abscesses are
secondary to older ones in the lungs. In some cases, however, a
careful examination does not disclose the source of the embolus.
The anterior portion of the brain, including the anterior and posterior
central convolutions and the first temporal, are supplied with blood
by the two terminal branches of the internal carotid, the anterior and
middle cerebral, the ganglia underlying these portions of the cortex
being supplied, as already stated, by small branches arising near the
origin of these two trunks, and principally the second. The anterior
cerebrals of the two sides are connected by the anterior
communicating, which is a short and usually wide vessel. Sometimes
one anterior cerebral branches in the longitudinal fissure, and
supplies a part of both sides. Hence in plugging of one internal
carotid which does not reach its bifurcation a collateral supply may
be received from the other side. If, however, an embolus or thrombus
has penetrated beyond the origin of the middle cerebral, this vessel
can no longer receive a supply from the anterior.
When the large trunks leave the circle of Willis to be distributed upon
the surface of the brain, after giving off from the first centimeter or
two of their course the nutrient arteries for the deep-seated ganglia,
they break up into several branches which ramify upon the surface,
but, as Duret has shown, undergo very few anastomoses. Instead of
forming, as was once supposed, a richly inosculating network, small
branches penetrate into the brain-substance perpendicularly from
the superficial vessels, but these do not communicate freely with
each other by vessels larger than capillaries.
From these anatomical conditions it happens that when a vascular
territory is deprived of its normal supply by an embolus, it cannot be
supplied with blood from surrounding districts. A certain limited
amount of collateral supply is possible through the capillaries and the
rare anastomoses, but it is only around the edges, and the centre of
the territory becomes destitute of circulating blood. Thus an embolus
does not in the brain produce, as it does in other organs with more
abundant collateral supply, a large hemorrhagic infarction.
The change produced in the cerebral substance from cutting off its
supply of blood is known as anæmic necrosis, and includes what has
been known as white softening, with probably some yellow, and
possibly a little red softening, the latter in case where simple
softening has been complicated by hemorrhage.
When the circulation ceases the substance that should have been
nourished loses its firmness and acquires a custard-like consistency.
The gray and white substances are no longer so distinct in
appearance, the latter losing its milky-white color, the whole surface
of a section becoming of a dirty yellowish-white, somewhat shining,
and looking as if it contained more moisture than normal. When a
considerable portion of the interior of the hemisphere is thus
affected, the brain outside, with its membranes, bags down, looks
swollen, and feels to the fingers as if there were present a sacful of
fluid. The boundaries of such an area of softening are marked off
from the healthy substance with some distinctness, though less than
that of a hemorrhage. There may be some hemorrhage around the
edges or into the cavity, so that the presence of a little blood-pigment
is no proof that the original lesion was not softening from occlusion.
In the further progress the contents of the cavity become more fluid,
and finally a somewhat distinct cyst is formed, not unlike that from a
hemorrhage, with an internal areolar structure from the remains of
connective tissue, and contents of a slightly yellowish or brownish
color, or often of a chalky white. These cysts have little to distinguish
them, when old, from similar ones left by hemorrhage, except the
much greater amount of pigment in the latter. The smaller spots of
softening may after a time lose their fluidity, and remain as yellowish
patches as firm as, or firmer than, the surrounding brain. The region
of the brain involved becomes atrophied, the convolutions shrink,
and the membranes become filled with serous fluid, to compensate
for the sinking of the surface.
What has just been written applies to the simple mechanical action
of emboli. If, however, they have a septic origin, as notably in cases
of ulcerative endocarditis, the region in which they lodge becomes,
instead of a simple spot of necrosis, a septic focus or abscess, with
its results of compression or irritation. In such a case there are likely
to be abscesses of similar origin in other organs, and the cerebral
lesion is only a part of the general pyæmic condition.
The same authors also speak of less defined symptoms, like delirium
and stupor, occurring among the inhabitants of the Salpêtrière (old
women), with intervals of comparative health, as being premonitory.
The annexed chart is from a man (W. I. W.) who was in the hospital
with ill-defined nervous symptoms, and was suddenly attacked with
convulsions, vomiting, and unconsciousness. He had a small tumor
at the point of the right temporal lobe, and softening of the left corpus
striatum. The apoplectic symptoms occurred on the 15th—that is, as
will be seen by the chart, one day after the temperature began to
rise. The pulse and respiration show no characteristic changes.
FIG. 40.
It is much more common for the embolus or thrombus to give rise to
a set of symptoms less severe than a fully-developed apoplectic fit.
During such a fit—or, more clearly, as it is passing off—we find more
or less marked paralytic symptoms, but these are quite as frequently
present without the loss of consciousness. The patient states that he
waked up and found one side of his body helpless, or that he was
reading the paper when it fell from his hand, and upon trying to walk
found that he could not do so. Loss of speech may be an initial
symptom. It has been spoken of as premonitory, but it is probable
that it is in reality only the beginning, which, in some cases may go
no farther, but is usually succeeded by more extensive paralysis,
which makes its meaning unmistakable. These symptoms may be
hours or even days in developing, with occlusion as well as with
hemorrhage. Very slight attacks may occur which hardly excite
attention, and lesions are found after death in many cases to which
there is nothing in the history to correspond.
Improvement may begin very rapidly in some cases where the lesion
is small, a sufficient amount of collateral circulation being developed
to prevent the structure from being disorganized. In others a
specially favorable anastomosis may preserve even a larger area,
but in others still it is not easy to account on entirely anatomical
grounds for the amount of improvement which takes place.
Trousseau cites the case of Lordat, who became aphasic, and after
recovery described his own case. The learned professor claims to
have been in full possession of his faculties, and to have arranged a
lecture with the divisions and subdivisions of the subject, and all this
without the thought of a single word passing through his mind.
Trousseau ventures to doubt the possibility of carrying on
complicated mental processes without words, and thinks Lordat may
have overestimated the precision of his mental processes. It appears
in confirmation of this view that after his attack he always read his
lectures, whereas before he had been distinguished as an
extempore speaker.