Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module8 Voting Apportionment
Module8 Voting Apportionment
MODULE
Learning Outcomes
By the end of the module, students will be able to:
Voting Methods
■ Explain the different voting systems
■ Interpret the information in the
preference table
■ Determine the winner using the
different voting methods
Apportionment
■ Explain the different terms used in
apportionment.
■ Apply the different apportionment
methods in solving problems.
References:
[1] Baltazar, E.C, Evangelista, J, & Ragasa, C. (2018). Mathematics in the
Modern World. C&E
Publishing
[2] Sobecki, D. (2019). Math
in Our World (4th Ed.).
McGraw-Hill Education
Introduction to Voting
Voting, for the most part, is a simple act.
There are candidates who wish to seek a position in government or even in
classroom scenes. The rest of the population chooses the worthier of the two or more
candidates and we call this person the winner or the candidate-elect. Sadly, not
everything is as easy as we make it sound. Even in student government elections,
there are always questions of was it a majority vote? Was the winner really favored
by the people, especially if there are many candidates like in senatorial elections?
There is also a choice of ranking the candidates according to the preference of
the user, but then how to select the winner is another problem that will occur. In the
voting method, we will discuss the three different methods of selecting a winner based
on the preference of the voter. An election conducted this way allows the voter to cast a
preference ballot. A preference ballot ranks all the candidates in order of your
preference.
Say, there are 4 candidates, let’s call them Candidates W, X, Y, Z. Then any
of the following 24 choices are possible for any voter.
The more candidates there are, the more possible choices there are also. But of
course, we also know that the scenario above may not happen as most voters are
actually in sync or have the same preference in ranking candidates.
The number of possible choices depends on the number of candidates.
If there are 3, .
If there are 6,
After the ballots are cast, the votes are tallied in a table called a preference table.
A preference table is used to show results of a preference ballot method of voting.
Number of voters 86 42 19 13 40
1st choice X WY XY
2nd choice W ZZ ZX
3rd choice Y XX WZ
4th choice Z YW YW
The example above should show columns that are unique, so each is a different
option. The number above indicates the number of voters for each choice and one
should be able to answer how many voters voted in the election.
Using this preference table, we simply list down the number of votes for
each candidate in the 1st choice.
With this, we declare Candidate X as the winner with the most number of
votes.
The Plurality Method with Elimination
The plurality method with elimination is a slightly complicated way of
choosing a winner.
In this method, the candidate with the majority of first-place votes is declared
the winner.
If no candidate has a majority of first-place votes, the candidate (or
candidates) with the least number of first-place votes is eliminated, then the
candidates who were below the eliminated candidate move up on the ballot, and
the number of first-place votes is counted again.
To decide on the majority, the candidate should have more than 50% of
the votes.
1st choice X W Z XY
2nd choice W Z Y ZW
3rd choice Y Y X WZ
4th choice Z X W YX
Using this preference table, we total the number of voters which is 200, and
compute 50% which
gives us 100.
Then just like in the Plurality Method, we simply list down the number of
votes for each candidate in the 1st choice.
With this, we have Candidate X with 79 votes, but he is not the winner since
We proceed to eliminate the candidate with the least number of votes, in this
case Candidate Z.
From 4 choices we are now left with 3.
Number of voters 66 42 39 13 40 200
1st choice X W Y X Y
2nd choice W Y X W W
3rd choice Y X W Y X
N
ow we have a tie, but still not in the majority as , for both. Eliminate
Candidate W since it has the least number of votes.
1st choice X Y Y X Y
2nd choice Y X X Y X
Then use again the Plurality Method, with the 1st choices.
Then computing for which candidate has the most number of points:
With Candidate Z having the most points, we declare Candidate Z as the winner
using the Borda Count
Method.
Contestant Rankings
A 1 3415
B 2 2154
C 3 1543
D 4 5232
E 5 4321
Option 1: To solve as is using the Plurality Method, simply select all the cells
with rank 1 in the table, and take the sum for each contestant. 5 columns means 5
number 1 votes.
Contestant Rankings
A 1 3415
B 2 2154
C 3 1543
D 4 5232
E 5 4321
Then simply add, according to the contestant using the number of votes.
Rankings Contestant
1 A CBA E
2 B BDE D
3 C AED C
4 D EAC B
5 E DCB A
Once the table is transformed, simply select the row with the 1 ranking to
declare the winner.
The winner for both options should be the same, as well as the votes of the
rest of the contestants.
So for the singing contest, the winner is contestant A.
Anne 3 441
Bob 1 234
Cathy 2 312
Daniel 4 123
# of Votes 5 947
As with the previous example, you can solve as is or transform the table.
Option 1: Since this is a Plurality Method with Elimination problem, we need
to have a majority winner. Get the sum of the number of votes.
.
25 voters means that we need at least 12.5 or 13 for a majority vote.
Candidate Rankings
Anne 3 441
Bob 1 234
Cathy 2 312
Daniel 4 123
# of Votes 5 947
Select all cells with rank 1 and get the total of those to verify the winner.
Since Daniel does not have a majority vote, we remove Cathy from the
selection as the person
with least votes. And re-
rank everyone.
Anne 2 331
Bob 1 223
Cathy 2 312
Daniel 3 112
# of Votes 5 947
Ranking Candidates
# of Votes 5 94 7
Since we do not have a majority vote, we remove Cathy from the selection.
From 4, we have 3
choices.
# of Votes 5 94 7
Now that Daniel has 13, we declare him the scholarship grantee.
The same as with Plurality Method, Option 1 and 2 should have the same
results of Daniel taking the scholarship.
Cellular Phone
RankingsRank - # of
Unit points
Apple 1 21 31–3
Huawei 2 13 22–2
Samsung 3 32 13–1
# of Respondents 37 25 48 30
As with the previous example, you can solve as is or transform the table.
Option 1: Using the given table, we solve for the total number of points using
rank and number of votes.
# of 37 25 48 30
Respondents
Compute for the brand with most points by multiplying points and number of
respondents.
The same results should also come up for the Borda Count Method. Apple is the
preferred brand.
1. Students at a college were asked to rank three improvements they would like to see
at their college. The choices were to build a new gymnasium (G), build a swimming
pool (S), or build a baseball / football field (B). The votes were summarized in the
preference table.
Number of votes 83 76 42 47
1st choice G S SB
2nd choice S G BS
3rd choice B B GG
2. The owner of a restaurant decides to poll regular customers to choose which dish
she’ll submit to an annual citywide competition. The choices are lemon-crusted salmon
(L), crab-stuffed chicken (C), garlic prime rib (G), and wasabi rolls (W). The results are
shown in the preference table.
# of votes 8 8554
C 1 4322
G 3 3214
L 4 1443
W 2 2131
3. A local movie theater asks its patrons which movies they would like to view during
next month's “Oldies but Goodies” week. The choices are Gone with the Wind (G),
Casablanca (C), Anatomy of Murder (A), and Back to the Future (B). The preference
table is shown below.
1st choice G AC B
2nd choice A CB G
3rd choice C BG A
4th choice B GA C
4. The Association of Self-Employed Working Persons is picking a speaker for its next
meeting. The choices for a topic are health care (H), investments (I), or advertising (A).
The results of the election are shown in the preference table.
# of votes 6 685
A 3 232
H 1 123
I 2 311
5. A panel of experts is convened to decide which hospital is the best hospital overall in
a metropolitan area. The 4 hospitals under consideration are Western Visayas Medical
Center (W), Community General Hospital (G), Children’s Hospital (C), Iloilo Doctors
Hospital (D). The preference table is shown below.
# of votes 5 5 466
Introduction to Apportionment
When a university council decides on the budget for each university event, and
gives a budget to each college, how do they go about this? What amount is given to
exactly one college? The short of it is, it will depend on the number of students enrolled
in each college. Usually, it depends on the miscellaneous or student fees paid for by
each student during enrollment. Easy enough, money can be divided to the last cent
after all.
But what if you are enrolled in a small elementary school and instead of money,
the donor decides to buy a score of tablets for students to use especially during these
pandemic education. How will the school ‘fairly’ distribute these tablets to each grade or
section for the benefit of students?
Terms to Remember:
1. A seat is an object being distributed to districts.
2. A district is a region / individual where a seat is being allocated.
3. The standard divisor is the average number of people per seat.
4. The standard quota for a district is the population of each district divided by
the standard divisor.
Hamilton’s Method
This method was suggested by Alexander Hamilton. It was used by the US
government from 1852 until 1911. It’s one of the simplest apportionment methods to
use.
Example. The USA campus has 76 parking slots for college students. The
following table shows the student population for each college. How will the parking
slots be distributed using Hamilton’s Method?
College Population
CLASE 550
CHAMP 1800
COT 1450
COC 900
First, solve for the total population and Calculate for the standard divisor.
Standard
quota
Standard
quota
Lower quota 8 29 23 14
Fourth, Assign each district the number of seats according to its lower quota.
CLASE has 8, CHAMP 29, COT has 23 and COC has14 parking areas.
Fifth, If the total number of assigned lower quotas is smaller than the number of
seats, assign missing
seats to district/s with
the highest decimal
value/s.
Standard quota
Lower quota 8 29 23 14 74
Additional Seats 1 1 2
Total Seats 9 29 23 15 76
Jefferson’s Method
This method is attributed to Thomas Jefferson. It was used by the US
government from 1791 until 1842. This method uses a modified divisor which is
determined by trial and error and is smaller than the standard divisor.
(b) If the sum of the lower quotas is smaller than the number of seats, modify the
standard divisor through trial and error but make sure that it will not be greater
than the original standard divisor. Then repeat steps 2 -4.
Example. The USA campus has 75 parking slots for college students. The
following table shows the student population for each college. How will the parking
slots be distributed using Jefferson’s Method?
COC
College
CLASE
Population 600
CHAMP 1800
COT 1500
900
First, solve for the total population and calculate for the standard
divisor.
Standard
quota
Standard
quota
Lower quota 9 28 23 14 74
Fourth,
(a) If the sum of the lower quotas is equal to the number of seats, assign each district
the number of seats using the lower quotas.
(b) If the sum of the lower quotas is smaller than the number of seats, modify the
standard divisor through trial and error but make sure that it will not be greater than the
original standard divisor. Then repeat steps 2 -4.
Standard
quota
Lower quota 9 28 23 14 74
It is not the correct standard divisor, since , Let's try 62 for the
modified standard divisor.
CLASE CHAMP COT COC
Standard
quota
Lower quota 9 29 24 14 76
Standard
quota
Lower quota 9 28 24 14 75
Now that we have assigned 75 parking slots, we end the computation here. 9
parking areas will be given to CLASE, 28 to CHAMP, 24 to COT and 14 parking areas to
COC.
There are slight differences with Hamilton’s Method since that was pretty
straightforward but Jefferson’s is a bit more ‘fairer’.
Then solve for each state standard quota. Get the lower quota of each district.
Get the sum of the lower quota to identify how many additional seats are required.
Assign each seat to each state.
divisor.
Then we solve for each college’ standard quota and lower quota.
College Arts & Sciences Business Fine Arts Total
AdministrationEngineering
Since 178 < 180, we modify the standard divisor by choosing a number smaller than the
standard divisor. Say 87.
Since 179 < 180, we modify the standard divisor by choosing a number smaller than the
standard divisor. Say 86.
Standard
quota
Since 183 > 180 , we don’t want to donate 3 projectors to cover the excess. We modify the
standard divisor to something a bit larger than 86 but less than 87, say 86.5.
Standard
quota
And that makes 180, so 39 projectors for Arts & Sciences, 66 for Business
Administration, 21 for Engineering and 54 for Fine Arts.
Remember, Jefferson’s Method includes trial and error in finding the correct
modified standard divisor. So patience is a much –needed virtue to hang on to.
MATHEMATICS IN THE MODERN WORLD
MODULE
2. A large school district has four high schools with enrollments as shown. Forty
school buses need to be allocated to the high schools. Determine how many
buses are allocated to each of the high schools.
3. A freight company has four terminals. The volume of business in truckloads for
each terminal is shown. The owner has purchased 12 new trucks to be allocated
to the four terminals. Determine how many trucks each terminal should get based
on volume of business.
Terminal A B C D Total
4. A hospital has five wards; the average number of patients per ward is shown.
Twelve new nurses are hired. Determine how many nurses each ward should
receive based on the number of patients.
Ward A B CD E Total