Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Make Your Business A Lean Business How To Create Enduring Market Leadership 1St Edition Paul C Husby Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Make Your Business A Lean Business How To Create Enduring Market Leadership 1St Edition Paul C Husby Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/acting-make-it-your-business-
how-to-avoid-mistakes-and-achieve-success-as-a-working-actor-2nd-
edition-paul-russell/
https://textbookfull.com/product/succeeding-with-ai-how-to-make-
ai-work-for-your-business-veljko-krunic/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-lean-book-of-lean-a-concise-
guide-to-lean-management-for-life-and-business-1st-edition-john-
earley/
https://textbookfull.com/product/selling-your-value-proposition-
how-to-transform-your-business-into-a-selling-organization-1st-
edition-cindy-barnes/
Monetising Data: How to Uplift Your Business 1st
Edition Andrea Ahlemeyer-Stubbe
https://textbookfull.com/product/monetising-data-how-to-uplift-
your-business-1st-edition-andrea-ahlemeyer-stubbe/
https://textbookfull.com/product/be-2-0-beyond-
entrepreneurship-2-0-turning-your-business-into-an-enduring-
great-company-1st-edition-collins/
https://textbookfull.com/product/change-your-world-how-anyone-
anywhere-can-make-a-difference-1st-edition-john-c-maxwell/
https://textbookfull.com/product/change-your-world-how-anyone-
anywhere-can-make-a-difference-1st-edition-john-c-maxwell-2/
https://textbookfull.com/product/how-to-start-your-own-business-
the-facts-visually-explained-1st-edition-dk/
Advance Praise
“Jerome does not only master the Lean Six Sigma/Hoshin Kanri theories, but
he also lived them. He implemented them in several companies and delivered
results. I have had the opportunity to witness it directly, and it was spectacular.
Jerome can quickly engage the most skeptical colleagues and align them behind
his plan and deliver results. I highly recommend his book, a small investment
that will help you deliver great shareholder value. Everybody can benefit from it,
great reading.”
Patrick Deconinck
3M Senior Vice President, retired
Jon Hartman
Vice President, North American Operations
World Kitchen LLC
Paul C. Husby
Jerome Hamilton
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish
reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the con-
sequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this
publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material
has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any
form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and
recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright
.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a
not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a
photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification
and explanation without intent to infringe.
Authors.............................................................................................................. xv
Introduction................................................................................................... xvii
vii
viii ◾ Contents
xv
xvi ◾ Authors
xvii
xviii ◾ Introduction
Whatever the causes, little real progress has been made in advancing under-
standing and sustainable success of LEOMS applications. This book is intended
to contribute to advancing LEOMS application success. The purpose of this book
is to reposition the discussion of Lean from a set of tools and processes to focus
on Lean as Taiichi Ohno positioned it in his book Toyota Production System as
a “system that will work for any type of business.”5 It is the goal of this book
to stimulate a new dialogue, repositioning the Lean discussion to focus on the
LEOMS. The book introduces new system models as part of an implementation
guide to assist in placing the focus on the LEOMS and includes references to
great contributions by a multitude of authors during the last 35 years.
Chapter Summaries
Chapter 1: The Lean Enterprise Operational Management System Overview
Chapter 1 provides background and chronology of manufacturing opera-
tional system development, highlighting the genius of Taiichi Ohno, who, see-
ing the fragmented pieces, developed a very logical total enterprise operational
management system that includes strategic plan deployment, operational plan
management, and continuous improvement elements. The chapter also identifies
applications of the LEOMS’s principles, tools, and thinking to business organiza-
tion processes outside of plant operations.
Chapter 2: Why Lean Enterprise?
Chapter 2 introduces Lean enterprise and its operational management system,
identifying four of the LEOMS’s distinctive differentiating attributes that validate it
as the best operational management system, with no close contenders.
Chapter 3: Business Strategy-Driven Lean Enterprise
Chapter 3 demonstrates how the Lean enterprise business model continuously
drives operational improvement to increase an enterprise’s strategic and opera-
tional competitive advantage. This is accomplished through rigorous application
of the Lean enterprise business model ensuring that enterprise’s strategy con-
nects and drives Lean’s powerful operational management system to continuously
improve strategic, financial, and operational performance.
Chapter 4: Engaging Leadership and Preparing the Culture Change Plan
Chapter 4 deals with the necessity of ensuring that company culture will enable
successful creation of an army of continuous improvement scientists. Company
culture related to people management and development is the single biggest
xx ◾ Introduction
◾◾ Global market access continues to grow as more and more countries around
the world participate in the global economy. This trend is likely to continue
Introduction ◾ xxi
◾◾ Free and open markets in the last three decades have greatly reduced global
poverty; in fact, it has been the greatest antipoverty program in history and
strengthened relationships among participants. It has also contributed to
reducing the purchasing power of middle-class populations in most devel-
oped countries, particularly those without high-value job skills and/or uni-
versity degrees.
implementation plan and its deployment. Concepts and principles are presented
in each chapter followed by application examples and author experiences, expert
quotations, and comments.
Valuable references are included for readers to develop more understanding of
specific tools and practices and their interrelationships. These references will be
in shaded text boxes, for example:
Taiichi Ohno
Toyota Production System, p. 53, Productivity Press, 1988
Author experiences and insights are provided for readers to provide more
details about specific tools and practices. These references will be in unshaded
text boxes:
Paul Husby
2. Saturn was established to set up a new kind of car company. Saturn estab-
lished a very good brand; customers were loyal and most were part of a
Saturn cult. Unfortunately, the status quo won, and this grand experiment
was killed.
We have a leadership crisis in many U.S. companies. What has been accom-
plished during the last 35 years as we started to understand Lean? We have
gotten to a point where many Lean tools and practices are applied in U.S. com-
panies. Unfortunately, the understanding of Lean as an enterprise operational
management system is practiced in only a very small percentage of companies
who proclaim that they are “doing Lean.” The real power of Lean is yet untapped
in the United States.
Leaders
We believe that in the coming decades, only developed country-based companies
that have sustainable strategic advantage and embrace Lean as their operational
management system will thrive for 100 years. Companies in North America and
Europe will be facing powerful competitors from China, India, and Brazil along
with others who will have the technological skills as good as or better than U.S.
and European companies. We will see the next round of U.S. company deaths as
they fail to grasp and internalize global competitive threats to their survival. It will
be a repeat of the 1970s and 1980s when a plethora of traditional U.S. companies
ended up on the scrap heap of failed companies. Those choosing to become a Lean
enterprise and adopting the LEOMS will improve their probability of success. Maybe
a better enterprise operational management system will come along, but until then,
following a path laid out by Taiichi Ohno is the only proven path to sustainable
operational excellence that supports and enables strategic competitive advantage.
Lean car companies such as Toyota, Honda, and Subaru have a maniacal focus
on elimination of all waste and creating customer value. They are consistent lead-
ers in reliability and resale value. Additionally, they are recognized as environ-
mental leaders having reliable products and minimal environmental impact from
their products and production processes. Because of their maniacal focus, it is
also likely that they will be leaders in improving employee health through chang-
ing their lifestyles and preventive medicine practices, thus reducing long-term
healthcare costs while reinforcing committed employees. Lean philosophy chal-
lenges traditional thinking of treating company, customer, company employee,
and community interests as conflicting, believing one must lose for the others to
gain. Instead, it accepts this apparent paradox of competing interests and uses it as
a catalyst for innovating solutions that allow all interests to be respected. A great
example of respecting company and employee interest occurred during the reces-
sion of 2007 through 2009; Toyota laid off its contract workers at its Texas truck
plant, but instead of laying off permanent workers, they were challenged to use
their problem-solving skills to find millions of dollars in savings. Toyota improved
Introduction ◾ xxv
Taiichi Ohno
Toyota Production System, p. xv, Productivity Press, 1988
So what about Toyota’s fall, with multiple recalls and the loss of confidence by
their customers? What does this tell us about relevance and value of the Toyota
Production System in today’s world? In a 2007 interview in the HBR July–August
2007 edition,6 Katsuaki Watanabe, president of Toyota, made three revealing
statements:
◾◾ “I realize that our systems maybe overstretched… We must make that issue
visible.”
◾◾ “If a time comes at Toyota when I need to put my foot on the brake pedal
rather than on the accelerator, I won’t hesitate to do so.”
◾◾ “It is my job to pull the Andon cord.”
◾◾ “Toyota has, for the past few years, been expanding its business rapidly.
Quite frankly, I fear the pace at which we have grown may have been too
quick.”
xxvi ◾ Introduction
◾◾ “I would point out here that Toyota’s priority has traditionally been the fol-
lowing: First, Safety; Second, Quality; and Third, Volume. These priorities
became confused, and we were not able to stop, think, and make improve-
ments as much as we were able to before, and our basic stance to listen to
customers’ voices to make better products has weakened somewhat.”
◾◾ “We pursued growth over the speed at which we were able to develop our
people and our organization, and we should sincerely be mindful of that.”
◾◾ “I regret that this has resulted in safety issues described in the recalls we
face today, and I am deeply sorry for any accidents that Toyota drivers have
experienced.”
Toyota proved that they were human, as their great success of the past few
decades led to a false confidence and resulted in making expansion decisions
that violated principles that built their success. The third point in Akio Toyoda’s
explanation gets to the heart of the matter: Toyota growth outpaced their ability
to train personnel sufficiently to be able to work within and sustain the Toyota
Production System. It has been passed on to new Toyota operations and people
through a process of experienced teachers, with great depth of knowledge,
personally coaching new people. This process was typically accomplished one-
on-one and went on for extended periods of time. Toyota wanted new people
to understand not only the visible dimensions of TPS but also all the invisible,
for example, the invisible depth of understanding of how one element of TPS
was interconnected to many other elements. In the end, this knowledge trans-
fer process, which created their success, also was a limitation that they did not
properly respect. Having read Taiichi Ohno’s book many times, I get this! Each
time I read the book, I see something new that I previously did not catch or
understand. Toyota’s recent failures were not caused by a failure of their system
but a failure of their leadership. I think the open and candid statements of Akio
Toyoda reflect a somewhat unique event and the top man at Toyota took owner-
ship for company failure; it was very refreshing! The bottom line is this: sustain-
able twenty-first century enterprises will require creating customer value through
innovation, speed, service excellence, and competitive cost. The companies who
have great innovation and true Lean enterprises will be market leaders, as they
will demonstrate speed to market and cost competitiveness, enhancing their
value and leveraging their innovation in support of their customers.
Summary
This book is offered with total admiration and respect for all the authors and
contributors to TPS–LEOMS over the past 35 years who have helped to open
the eyes and educate all of us who have passion for Taiichi Ohno’s LEOMS. Its
purpose is to create a more visible and complete model of the LEOMS, making
it more understandable to business leaders and practitioners, thus contributing
Introduction ◾ xxvii
References
1. Gary Cokins, Why do large companies fail? Analytics, June 2012.
2. Tom Peters and Robert Waterman, In Search of Excellence, New York: HarperCollins
Publishers, 1982.
3. Kim S. Cameron and Robert E. Quinn, Diagnosing and Changing Organizational
Culture, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
4. Oscar Motomura, Managing the Invisible, São Paulo, Brasil: Amana Key, 1998.
5. Taiichi Ohno, Toyota Production System, New York: Productivity Press, 1988.
6. Katsuaki Watanabe, President of Toyota, interview by the Harvard Business Review,
July–August 2007.
7. Akio Toyoda, President and CEO, Toyota, U.S. Congressional Testimony, February
23, 2010.
http://taylorandfrancis.com
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
of society gives the power to the mass of people to assert its own
tastes and demand its own enjoyments. To such a development the
universal success of Herz and Thalberg is related. It is because of
still further development that their wonders have become
commonplaces, not because either their purpose or their music is
intrinsically contemptible. Both these are respectable as
manifestations of energy and great labor; and that the two great
players achieved a victory which won the applause of the whole
world, indicates a streak of the hero in the cosmos of both.
III
We may conceive Herz and Thalberg each to be an infant Hercules,
strangling serpents in his cradle, if we compare them with Franz
Liszt, who, above all else, represents virtuosity grown to fully heroic
proportions. He was the great and universal hero in the history of
music. He cannot be dissociated from the public, the general world
over which he established his supremacy by feats of sheer muscular
or technical skill. Even the activity of his mind was essentially
empirical. Especially in the realm of pianoforte music he won his
unique place by colossal energy put to test or to experiment upon
the public through the instrument. The majority of his compositions in
this branch of music are tours de force.
His manifold activities in music all reveal the truly great virtuoso,
whom we may here define as an agent of highest efficiency between
a created art and the public to which it must be related. We will
presently analyze some of his compositions for the pianoforte, but
without presuming to draw from features of them so discovered any
conclusions as to their musical vitality or their æsthetic value. These
conclusions must be left to the wisdom and sense of posterity;
whatever they may prove to be, one cannot at present but recognize
in Liszt first and foremost the intermediary. He so conducted himself
in all his musical activities, which, taken in the inverse order of their
importance, show him as a writer upon subjects related to music, as
a conductor, as a composer, and as a pianist. He worked in an
indissoluble relation with the public, and by virtue of this relation
appears to us a hero of human and comprehensible shape, though
enormous, whose feet walked in the paths of men and women, and
whose head was not above the clouds in a hidden and secret
communion which we can neither define nor understand.
Liszt’s playing was stupendous. At least two influences fired him not
only to develop a technique which was limited only by the physically
impossible, but to establish himself as the unequalled player of the
age. Already as a youth when he first came to Paris this technique
was extraordinary, though probably not unmatched. It was the
wizardry of Paganini, whom he heard in Paris, that determined him
to seek an attainment hitherto undreamed of in skill with the
keyboard. This he achieved before he left Paris to journey away from
the world in Switzerland and Italy. During his absence Thalberg
came to Paris and took it by storm. Back came Liszt post-haste to
vanquish his rival and establish more firmly his threatened position.
The struggle was long and hotly fought, but the victory remained with
Liszt, who, though he had not that skill in a kind of melody playing
which was peculiar to Thalberg, towered far above his rival in virility,
in fire, and in variety.
It seems to have been above all else the fire in Liszt’s playing which
made it what it was, a fire which showed itself in great flames of
sound, spreading with incredible rapidity up and down the keyboard,
which, like lightning, was followed by a prodigious thunder. Yet it was
a playing which might rival all the elements, furious winds,
tumultuous waters, very phenomena of sounds. Caricatures show
him in all sorts of amazing attitudes, and many draw him with more
than two hands, or more than five fingers to a hand. At the piano he
was like Jupiter with the thunder-bolts, Æolus with the winds of
heaven, Neptune with the oceans of the earth in his control. And at
the piano he made his way to the throne which perhaps no other will
ever occupy again.
First, in these, and in all his music, he makes a free and almost
constant use of all the registers of the keyboard, the very low and the
very high more than they had been used before, and the middle with
somewhat more powerful scoring than was usual with any other
composers excepting Schumann. Particularly his use of the low
registers spread through the piano an orchestral thunder.
The ceaseless and rapid weaving together of the deepest and the
highest notes made necessary a wide, free movement of both arms,
and more remarkably of the left arm, because such rapid flights had
hardly been demanded of it before. The fourth étude, a musical
reproduction of the ride of Mazeppa, is almost entirely a study in the
movement of the arms, demanding of them, especially in the playing
of the inner accompaniment, an activity and control hardly less rapid
or less accurate than what a great part of pianoforte music had
demanded of the fingers.
In the long and extremely rapid tremolos with which his music is
filled, it is again the arm which is exerted to new efforts. The last of
the études is a study in tremolo for the arm, and so is the first of the
Paganini transcriptions. The tremolo, it need hardly be said, is no
invention of Liszt’s, but no composer before him demanded either
such rapidity in executing it, or such a flexibility of the arm. The
tremolo divided between the two hands, as here in this last study,
and the rapid alternation of the two hands in the second study,
depend still further on the freedom of the arm. It is the arm that is
called upon almost ceaselessly in the tenth study; and the famous
Campanella in the Paganini series is only a tour de force in a lateral
movement of the arm, swinging on the wrist.
The series, usually chromatic, of free chords which one finds surging
up and down the keyboard, often for both hands, may well paralyze
the unpracticed arm; the somewhat bombastic climaxes, in which, à
la Thalberg, he makes a huge noise by pounding chords, are a task
for the arm. All of the last part of the eleventh étude, Harmonies du
soir, is a study for the arm. Indeed even the wide arpeggios, running
from top to bottom of the keyboard in bolder flight than Thalberg
often ventured upon, the rushing scales, in double or single notes,
the countless cadenzas and runs for both hands, all of these, which
depend upon velocity for their effect, are possible only through the
unmodified liberation of the arm.
All this movement of the arm over wide distances and at high speed
makes possible the broad and sonorous effects which may be said
to distinguish his music from that of his predecessors and his
contemporaries. It makes possible his thunders and his winds, his
lightnings and his rains. Thus he created a sort of grand style which
every one must admit to be imposing.
Beyond these effects it is difficult to discover anything further so
uniquely and so generally characteristic in his pianoforte style. He
demands an absolutely equal skill in both hands, frequently
throughout an entire piece. He calls for the most extreme velocity in
runs of great length, sometimes in whole pages; and for as great
speed in executing runs of double notes as in those of single. A
study like the Feux-Follets deals with a complex mixture of single
and double notes. All these things, however, can be found in the
works of Schumann, or Chopin, or even Beethoven. Yet it must be
said that no composer ever made such an extended use of them, nor
exacted from the player quite so much physical endurance and
sustained effort. Moreover, against the background of his effects of
the arm, they take on a new light, no matter how often they had a
share in the works of other composers.
It can hardly be denied, furthermore, that this new light which they
seem to give his music, by which it appears so different from that of
Schumann and even more from that of Chopin, is also due to the use
to which he puts them. With Liszt these things are indisputably used
wholly as effects. Liszt follows Thalberg, or represents a further
development of the idea of pianoforte music which Thalberg
represents. He deals with effects,—with, as we have said elsewhere
of Thalberg, masses of sound. Very few of his compositions for the
pianoforte offer a considerable exception, and with these we shall
have to do presently. The great mass of études, concert or salon
pieces, and transcriptions, those works in which he displays this
technique, are virtuoso music. He shows himself in them a
sensationalist composer. Therefore the music suffers by the
necessary limitations mentioned in connection with Herz and
Thalberg, with the difference that within these limitations Liszt has
crowded the utmost possible to the human hand.
His great resources still remain speed and noise. He can do no more
than electrify or stupefy. It must not be forgotten that in these
limitations lies the glory of his music, its quality that is heroic
because it wins its battles in the world of men and women. It is
superb in its physical accomplishment. It shows the mighty Hercules
in a struggle with no ordinary serpent, but with the hundred-headed
Hydra. Yet if he will electrify he must do so with speed that is
reckless, and if he will overpower with noise he must be brutal.
Hence the great sameness in his material, trills, arpeggios, scales,
and chromatic scales, which are no more than these trills, arpeggios,
scales, etc., even if they be filled up with all the notes the hand can
grasp. Hence also the passages of rapidly repeated chords in places
where he wishes to be imposing to the uttermost.
IV
Liszt wrote a vast amount of music for the pianoforte. There is not
space to discuss it in detail, and, in view of the nature of it and the
great sameness of his procedures, such a discussion is not
profitable. For a study of its general characteristics it may be
conveniently and properly divided into three groups. These are made
up respectively of transcriptions, of a sort of realistic music heavily
overlaid with titles, and of a small amount of music which we may
call absolute, including a sonata and two concertos.
But what, after all, is this long fantasia but a show piece of the
showiest and the emptiest kind? How is it more respectable than
Thalberg’s fantasia on themes from ‘Moses,’ except that it contains
fifty times as many notes and is perhaps fifty times louder and
faster? It is a grand, a superb tour de force; but the pianist who plays
it—and he must wield the power of the elements—reveals only what
he can do, and what Liszt could do. It can be only sensational. There
is no true fineness in it. It is massive, almost orchestral. The only
originality there is in it is in making a cyclone roar from the strings, or
thunder rumble in the distance and crash overhead. On the whole
the meretricious fantasia on Rigoletto is more admirable, because it
is more naïve and less pretentious.
V
The second group of music to be observed consists of original
pieces of a more or less realistic type. Nearly all have titles. There
are Impressions et Poésies, Fleurs mélodiques des Alpes,
Harmonies poétiques et réligieuses, Apparitions, Consolations,
Légendes and Années de pèlerinage. There are even portraits in
music of the national heroes of Hungary. In the case of some the title
is an after-thought. It indicates not what suggested the music but
what the music suggested. There are two charming studies, for
example, called Waldesrauschen and Gnomenreigen, which are
pure music of captivating character. They are no more program
music than Schumann’s ‘Fantasy Pieces,’ nor do they suffer in the
slightest from the limitations which a certain sort of program is held
to impose upon music. First of all one notices an admirable
treatment of the instrument. There is no forcing, no reckless speed
nor brutal pounding. Then the quality of the music is fresh and
pleasing, quite spontaneous; and both are delightful in detail.
Others are decidedly more realistic than most good music for the
pianoforte which had been written up to that time. Take, for example,
the two Legends, ‘The Sermon of the Birds to St. Francis of Assisi,’
and ‘St. Francis of Paule Walking on the Waves.’ These are picture
music. In the one there is the constant twitter and flight of birds, in
the other the surging of waters. Both are highly acceptable to the
ear, but perhaps more as sound than as music. They depend upon
effects, and the effects are those of imitation and representation. The
pieces lose half their charm if one does not know what they are
about.
Yet, though in looking over the Années de pèlerinage one may find
but a very few pieces of genuine worth, though most are pretentious,
there is in all a certain sort of fire which one cannot approach without
being warmed. It is the glorious spirit of Byron in music. There is the
facility of Byron, the posturing of Byron, the oratory of Byron; but
there is his superb self-confidence too, showing him tricking himself
as well as the public, yet at times a hero, and Byron’s unquenchable
enthusiasm and irrepressible passionateness.
Finally we come to the small group of big pieces in which we find the
sonata in B minor, the two concertos, several études, polonaises and
concert pieces. Among the études, the great twelve have been
already touched upon. Besides these the two best known are those
in D-flat major and in F minor. The former is wholly satisfactory. The
latter is at once more difficult and less spontaneous. The two
polonaises, one in C minor and one in E major, have the virtues
which belong to concert pieces in the style of Weber’s Polacca, the
chief of which is enormous brilliance. In addition to this that in C
minor is not lacking in a certain nobility; but that in E major is all of
outward show.
The long work spins itself out page after page with the motives of the
introduction in various forms and this sort of sparring for time. There
is no division into separate movements, yet there are clear sections.
These may be briefly touched upon. Immediately after the
introduction there is a fine-sounding phrase in which one notices the
volplane motive (right hand) and the drum motive (left hand). It is
only two measures long, yet is at once repeated three times, once in
B minor, twice in E minor. Then follow measures of the most trite
music building. The phrases are short and without the slightest
distinction, and the ceaseless repetition is continued so inexorably
that one may almost hear in the music a desperate asthmatic
struggle for breath. One is relieved of it after two or three pages by a
page of the falling scale motive under repeated octaves and chords.
These are, indeed, its proved greatness, and chief of them is a direct
and forceful appeal to the general public. It needs no training of the
ear to enjoy or to appreciate Liszt’s music. Merely to hear it is to
undergo its forceful attraction. Back of it there stands Liszt, the
pianist and the virtuoso, asserting his power in the world of men and
women. However much or little he may be an artist, he is ever the
hero of pianoforte music. So it seems fitting to regard him last as
composer of nineteen Hungarian Rhapsodies, veritably epics in
music from the life of a fiery, impetuous people. Rhythms, melodies,
and even harmonies are the growth of the soil of Hungary. They
belonged to the peasant before Liszt took them and made them
thunderous by his own power. What he added to them, like what he
added to airs from favorite operas, may well seem of stuff as
elemental as the old folk-songs themselves: torrents and hurricanes
of sound, phenomena of noise. The results are stupendous, and in a
way majestic.
As far as pianoforte music is concerned Liszt revealed a new power
of sound in the instrument by means of the free movement of the
arms, and created and exhausted effects due to the utmost possible
speed. These are the chief contributions of his many compositions to
the literature of the piano. His music is more distinguished by them
than by any other qualities. In melody he is inventive rather than
inspired. His rhythms lack subtlety and variety. Of this there can be
no better proof than the endless short-windedness already observed
in the sonata in B minor, which is to be observed, moreover, in the
Symphonic Poems for orchestra. As a harmonist he lacks not so
much originality as spontaneity. He is oftener bold than convincing.
One finds on nearly every page signs of the experimentalist of heroic
calibre. He is the inventor rather than the prophet, the man of action
rather than the inspired rhapsodist. He is a converter into music
oftener than a creator of music.