Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Nuclear Safety Petrangeli Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Nuclear Safety Petrangeli Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/radiation-safety-in-nuclear-
medicine-a-practical-concise-guide-gopal-b-saha/
https://textbookfull.com/product/safety-reliability-human-
factors-and-human-error-in-nuclear-power-plants-1st-edition-b-s-
dhillon/
https://textbookfull.com/product/international-cooperation-for-
enhancing-nuclear-safety-security-safeguards-and-non-
proliferation-60-years-of-iaea-and-euratom-luciano-maiani/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nuclear-magnetic-resonance-
vasudevan-ramesh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nuclear-cardiology-second-
edition-arumugam/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-consequences-of-american-
nuclear-disarmament-strategy-and-nuclear-weapons-1st-edition-
christine-m-leah-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/universalizing-nuclear-
nonproliferation-norms-a-regional-framework-for-the-south-asian-
nuclear-weapon-states-adil-sultan/
Nuclear Safety
Nuclear Safety
Second Edition
Gianni Petrangeli
Consultant, Formerly ENEA, Italy
Formerly University of Pisa, Italy
Butterworth-Heinemann is an imprint of Elsevier
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission
in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s
permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the
Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than
as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our
understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any
information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they
should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional
responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability
for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or
from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress
ISBN: 978-0-12-818326-7
v
vi Contents
I have written this book because of my firm belief that it is necessary to try to gather and to pre-
serve in written form, and from one perspective, the accumulated memory and experience in the
field of nuclear safety and radiation protection. This is particularly important for countries where
nuclear energy exploitation has been stopped, but where it might have to be resumed in future. The
main accent of this book is on Nuclear Safety.
From another point of view, many areas developed in nuclear safety studies are of interest in
the safety of process plants too and, therefore, it is worthwhile writing about them. Given this per-
spective, I have tried to collect the ideas, the data, and the methods which, in many decades of pro-
fessional work in several countries, in my opinion are the most useful for evaluation of “integrated
system” of the plant safety.
I have emphasized the complete site plant system more than single details, so the data and the
methods discussed are not those applied in the many specialized disciplines devoted to the in-depth
study of safety but are those required for overall, first approximation, assessments. In my opinion,
such assessments are the most useful ones for the detection of many safety-related problems in a
plant and for the drafting of a complete picture of them. The more accurate and precise the methods
are, the more essential it is in the optimization phase of plant design and of its operational para-
meters. Specialists in reactor engineering, thermal hydraulics, radiation protection, and structural
response issues may, therefore, be surprised to read that simple methods and shortcuts suggested
here are very useful, as my experience and that of other “generalists” suggestions.
In addition, this book aims to cover some general and some unusual topics, such as the overall
conditions to be complied with by a “safe” plant, the transboundary consequences of accidents to
plants or to specific activities, the consequences of terrorist acts, and so on.
On some crucial issues the views of the world’s nuclear specialists are not the same, for exam-
ple, the views in Western countries compared with those in former soviet-bloc countries on the pre-
Chernobyl approach to nuclear safety in Eastern Europe: the West considered the soviet approach
to be a relatively lenient one, while the soviets thought that they concentrated on prevention of
accidents rather than on the mitigation of them. In these cases the text tries to be objective and to
quote the “Eastern” view besides the “Western” one, leaving future engineers and technical devel-
opments to decide on this issue.
Except where explicitly indicated, the text refers to the pressurized water reactor. Extrapolation
to other kinds of plants is, however, possible.
The text complies with internationally recognized safety standards, and in particular with
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) requirements.
On occasions I have digressed, in notes, from the main thrust of the text. I have done this for
several reasons: many notes relate facts that qualify or justify what is written in a preceding para-
graph; some of them are numerical examples added for clarification, while others are simple com-
ments and personal reflections on the subject. These notes are set at the end of each chapter.
I have provided a list of references at the end of each chapter; however a chapter (Additional
references) lists some organizations that offer “institutional” references [IAEA, Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and United States Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (USNRC) that is one of the richest sources of publications among the regulatory
xiii
xiv Preface
bodies]. Many of these references can be consulted and even downloaded from the websites listed
in the Web sites chapter.
Calculation sheets mentioned in the text may be downloaded from the publisher’s website
(http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/4hc54vnzx6.2); the way to use them is described in the text.
Finally, I wish to underline that all my experience suggests to me, after many positive and nega-
tive lessons learned, that today’s nuclear plants can be completely safe and that significant acci-
dents can be avoided. This is, however, only true on the condition that safety objectives are
carefully pursued by the organizations involved in the plants; in this arena, as it will be shown,
even organizations apparently very far from any specific plant must be, up to a certain extent,
included (e.g., the bodies responsible for the general energy strategy of a country and the “media”).
This situation does not exclude that future nuclear plants should be “cheaper and safer” than
today’s nuclear plants. The organization WENRA (see Section 1.2.4) has very courageously put an
accent on the need that future plants be safer than present ones by design: a long-awaited statement
by many professionals interested in nuclear safety. I personally, among others, asked the partici-
pants to a closed meeting of a top European Organizations to think over the overwhelming benefit
of a statement like this in the 1980s, even taking into account the possible wrong use of it by some
sectors of public opinion and press. It must be remembered, indeed, that existing safe plants benefit
from the accumulated operational experience and ensuing modifications to plant features and their
operation: this is an added safety value which, for future different types of plants, must be over-
compensated by an increase of safety through design.
I also stress the need that future plants be cheaper than present ones: from the safety point of
view, this feature will make plant surveillance and safety-useful modifications easier to accept by
investors (see Chapter 18: Nuclear Safety Criteria).
I am confident that from the list of Generation IV reactors presently under study
(Section 1.2.4), one plant with the above-listed characteristics will emerge. Very recently, some
facts (see Nuclear News, 2019 for Canada) seem to indicate the start of an investor’s interest in
Generation IV reactors (MOLTEN SALT REACTOR and HTGR) beyond the research activities
going on in many organizations worldwide.
In general terms, cheaper and safer nuclear reactors should have the following good “fundamen-
tals” or “basic characteristics”:
• Reduced internal pressure of components
• Reduced presence of highly corrosive fluids
• Reduced presence of flammable materials
• Self-shutdown in the case of dangerous disturbances
• Intrinsically safe siting (reduced danger of destructive earthquakes, inundations, and slides)
The choice of a future, cheaper and safer, reactor type, moreover, should not be influenced (as
it might be) by the intertwined relation between peaceful uses of nuclear energy and military uses
of it (Uekoetter, 2012; McPhee, 1974). In particular, Thorium-fuelled reactors should not be
penalized.
This issue is not dealt with in this book for the lack of reliable and public numerical data.
However, in the light of past experience and choices, this issue is important.
I will be very grateful to my readers for any suggestion concerning any improvements to the
text and also corrections to the mistakes which are certainly present in it. I am fully aware, in
Preface xv
particular, of the subjective nature of the choice of the material: the subject of nuclear safety, as
does that concerning the safety of process plants in general, has become, over time, a discipline
comprising many specific rather autonomous subsections. It is not easy, therefore, to choose the
material to be included in a general text like this one; in this, practical experience of what is neces-
sary while doing assessment work of plants has been my guide.
REFERENCES
McPhee J., 1974. The Curve of Binding Energy (Chapters 19 22).
Nuclear News, ANS (American Nuclear Society), issue April 2019, International, page 33.
Uekoetter, F., 2012. Fukushima and the lessons of history: remarks on the past and future of nuclear power.
Source: RCC Perspectives, No. 1, Europe After Fukushima: German Perspectives on the Future Nuclear
Power. Rachel Carson Center, pp. 9 32.
CHAPTER
INTRODUCTION
1
1.1 OBJECTIVES
The objectives of nuclear safety consist in ensuring the siting and the plant conditions need to
comply with adequate principles, such as the internationally accepted health, safety, and radiopro-
tection principles. In particular, the plant at the chosen site shall guarantee that the health of the
population and of the workers does not suffer adverse radiation consequences more severe than the
established limits and that such effects be the lowest reasonably obtainable [the ALARA (as low as
reasonably achievable) Principle] in all operational conditions and in case of accidents.
These objectives are frequently subdivided into a general objective, a radiation protection
objective, and a technical objective, for example, in the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) criteria (see www.iaea.org).
The general nuclear safety objective (IAEA Fundamental Safety Principles SF-1, 2006) is to
protect individuals, society, and the environment from harm by establishing and maintaining effec-
tive defences against radiological hazards in nuclear installations.
The radiation protection objective is to ensure that in all operational states radiation exposure
within the installation or due to any planned release of radioactive material from the installation is
kept below prescribed limits and ALARA, and to ensure mitigation of the radiological conse-
quences of any accidents.
The technical safety objective is to take all reasonably practicable measures to prevent accidents
in nuclear installations and to mitigate their consequences should they occur; to ensure with a high
level of confidence that, for all possible accidents taken into account in the design of the installa-
tion, including those of very low probability, any radiological consequences would be minor and
below prescribed limits; and to ensure that the likelihood of accidents with serious radiological con-
sequences is extremely low.
The target for existing power plants consistent with the technical safety objective has been
defined by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (advisor to the IAEA Director
General) as a likelihood of occurrence of severe core damage that is below about 1024 events per
plant operating year. Implementation of all safety principles at future plants should lead to the
achievement of an improved goal of not more than about l025 such events per plant operating year.
Severe accident management and mitigation measures should reduce the probability of large offsite
releases requiring short-term offsite response by a factor of at least 10.
It has to be observed that these principles, while indicating the need for strict control of radia-
tion sources, do not preclude the external release of limited amounts of radioactive products nor the
limited exposure of people to radiation. Similarly, the objectives require to decrease the likelihood
and the severity of accidents, but they recognize that some accidents can happen. Measures have to
Nuclear Safety. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818326-7.00001-9
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1
2 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
be taken for the mitigation of their consequences. Such measures include onsite accident
management systems (procedures, equipment, operators) and offsite intervention measures.
The greater the potential hazard of a release, the lower must be its likelihood.
The chapters of this book, except the few of them not concerned with the safety of nuclear
installations, deal with the ways for practically achieving these objectives.
Cadmium Ax
solution man
Spectator
FIGURE 1.1
Drawing of the CP1 pile. Scram—this term means “fast shutdown of a reactor”: various explanations have been
proposed for its origin. The most credited one assumes that it derives from the abbreviated name of the CP1
safety rod which could be actuated by an axe. In the original design sketches of the pile, the position of the
operator of the axe was indicated by “SCRAM,” the abbreviation of “Safety Control Rod Ax Man.” The
designated operator was the physicist Norman Hilberry, subsequently Director of the Argonne Laboratory. His
colleagues used the name “Mister Scram.”
Courtesy Prof. Raymond Murray.
14 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
elsewhere, was not unanimously considered satisfactory. Sentences like “. . . the not yet learnt
Fukushima lessons . . .” have been aired in various occasions by exigent safety experts.
Climate change has increased the risk of floods for nuclear plants, and 54 of the 60 in the US are
not designed to handle impending flood risks. Gregory Jaczko, former Nuclear Regulatory
Commission chairman, says the Trump administration has yet to require nuclear power plant own-
ers to take sufficient steps to combat climate change.
Nuclear Smart (2019)
ENDNOTES
1. What radiation dose did Fermi and the other scientists absorb during the first criticality? Taking into
account that the reactor was kept in a critical state for roughly half an hour and that the power was equal
to about 0.5 W, an order of magnitude evaluation using current data (Glasstone, 1963) shows that the
dose due to neutrons and gamma rays was in the order of 10 µSv (1 mrem); very low indeed.
2. According to a number of experts, in particular from the former USSR, this situation is not to be viewed
as the outcome of a more rigorous attitude in the West than in the East. There were different safety phi-
losophies in East and West: the former focused on accident prevention without much care of the high
cost (at least in the case of VVER reactors), the latter focused more on mitigation of accidents, with a
strong effect on the results from costbenefit considerations. The debates on relativism in philosophy
(e.g., ethics or epistemology) have some similarity with these arguments. Indeed, relativism has not to be
identified, as some of its critics say, with the thesis that all points of view are equally valid, but with the
thesis that one thing (moral values, beauty, knowledge, taste, meaning and nuclear safety criteria, too) is
relative to some particular framework or standpoint (e.g., the individual subject, a culture, an era, a lan-
guage or a conceptual scheme). Moreover, no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. With these
kinds of highly controversial similarities, it is easy to understand that any attempt to resolve the issue by
discussions may scarcely be productive and that only the future will indicate where the relative merits are
higher.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
CHAPTER I.
HEALTH.
[Contents]
A.—LESSONS OF INSTINCT.
Man in his primitive state had his full share of those protective
instincts, which still manifest themselves in children and Nature-
guided savages. It is a mistake to suppose that the lowest of those
savages [19]are naturally fond of ardent spirits. The travelers Park,
Gerstaecker, Vambery, Kohl, De Tocqueville, and Brehm agree that
the first step on the road to ruin is always taken in deference to the
example of the admired superior race, if not in compliance with direct
persuasion. The negroes of the Senegal highlands shuddered at the
first taste of alcohol, but from a wish to conciliate the good will of
their visitors hesitated to decline their invitations, which
subsequently, indeed, became rather superfluous. The children of
the wilderness unhesitatingly prefer the hardships of a winter camp
to the atmospheric poisons of our tenement houses. Shamyl Ben
Haddin, the Circassian war chief, whose iron constitution had
endured the vicissitudes of thirty-four campaigns, pathetically
protested against the pest air of his Russian prison cell, and warned
his jailers that, unless his dormitory was changed, Heaven would
hold them responsible for the guilt of his suicide. I have known
country boys to step out into a shower of rain and sleet to escape
from the contaminated atmosphere of a city workshop, and after a
week’s work in a spinning mill return to the penury of their mountain
homes, rather than purchase dainties at the expense of their lungs.
[Contents]
B.—REWARDS OF CONFORMITY.
[Contents]
C.—PERVERSION.
D.—PENALTIES OF NEGLECT.
But the laws of Nature cannot be outraged with impunity, and the aid
of supernatural agencies has never yet protected our ghost-mongers
from the consequences of their sins against the monitions of their
physical conscience. The neglect of cleanliness avenges itself in
diseases which no prayer can avert; during the most filthful and
prayerful period of the Middle Ages, seven out of ten city-dwellers
were subject to scrofula of that especially malignant form that attacks
the glands and the arteries as well as the skin. Medical nostrums
and clerical hocus-pocus of the ordinary sort were, indeed, so
notoriously unavailing against that virulent affection that thousands
of sufferers took long journeys to try the efficacy of a king’s touch, as
recorded by the unanimous testimony of contemporary writers, as
well as in the still [27]current term of a sovereign remedy. A long foot-
journey, with its opportunities for physical exercise, outdoor camps,
and changes of diet, often really effected the desired result; but, on
their return to their reeking hovels, the convalescents experienced a
speedy relapse, and had either to repeat the wearisome journey or
resign themselves to the “mysterious dispensation” of a Providence
which obstinately refused to let miracles interfere with the normal
operation of the physiological laws recorded in the protests of
instinct. Stench, nausea, and sick-headaches might, indeed, have
enforced those protests upon the attention of the sufferers; but the
disciples of Antinaturalism had been taught to mistrust the
promptings of their natural desires, and to accept discomforts as
signs of divine favor, or, in extreme cases, to trust their abatement to
the intercession of the saints, rather than to the profane interference
of secular science.
The dungeon-life of the monastic maniacs, and the abject
submission to the nuisance of atmospheric impurities, avenged
themselves in the ravages of pulmonary consumption; the votaries of
dungeon-smells were taught the value of fresh air by the tortures of
an affliction from which only the removal of the cause could deliver a
victim, and millions of orthodox citizens died scores of years before
the attainment of a life-term which a seemingly inscrutable
dispensation of Heaven grants to the unbelieving savages of the
wilderness. The cheapest of all remedies, fresh air, surrounded them
in immeasurable abundance, craving admission and offering them
the [28]aid which Nature grants even to the lowliest of her creatures,
but a son of a miracle-working church had no concern with such
things, and was enjoined to rely on the efficacy of mystic
ceremonies: “If any man is sick among you, let him call for the elders
of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in
the name of the Lord.” “And the prayer of faith shall cure the sick,
and the Lord shall raise him up.”
[Contents]
E.—REDEMPTION.
It has often been said that the physical regeneration of the human
race could be achieved without the aid of a miracle, if its systematic
pursuit were followed with half the zeal which our stock-breeders
bestow upon the rearing of their cows and horses. A general
observance of the most clearly recognized laws of health would,
indeed, abundantly suffice for that purpose. There is, for instance, no
doubt that the morbid tendency of our indoor modes of occupation
could be counteracted by gymnastics, and the trustees of our
education fund should build a gymnasium near every town school.
As a condition of health, pure air is as essential as pure water and
food, and no house-owner should be permitted to sow [31]the seeds
of deadly diseases by crowding his tenants into the back rooms of
unaired and unairable slum-prisons. New cities should be projected
on the plan of concentric rings of cottage suburbs (interspersed with
parks and gardens), instead of successive strata of tenement flats.
In every large town all friends of humanity should unite for the
enforcement of Sunday freedom, and spare no pains to brand the
Sabbath bigots as enemies of the human race. We should found
Sunday gardens, where our toil-worn fellow-citizens could enjoy their
holidays with outdoor sports and outdoor dances, free museums,
temperance drinks, healthy refreshments, collections of botanical
and zoölogical curiosities. Country excursions on the only leisure day
of the laboring classes should be as free as air and sunshine, and
every civilized community should have a Recreation League for the
promotion of that purpose.
Such text-books would prepare the way for health lectures, for health
legislation and the reform of municipal hygiene. The untruth that “a
man can not be defiled by things entering him from without” has
been thoroughly exploded by the lessons of science, and should no
longer excuse the neglect of that frugality which in the times of the
pagan republics formed the best safeguard of national vigor. Milk,
bread, and fruit, instead of greasy viands, alcohol, and narcotic
drinks, would soon modify the mortality statistics of our large cities,
and we should not hesitate to recognize the truth that the remarkable
[33]longevity of the Jews and Mohammedans has a great deal to do
with their dread of impure food.
[Contents]
CHAPTER II.
STRENGTH.
[Contents]
A.—LESSONS OF INSTINCT.
[Contents]
B.—REWARDS OF CONFORMITY.
The “survival of the fittest” means, in many important respects, the
survival of the strongest. In a state of nature weakly animals yield to
their stronger rivals; the stoutest lion, the swiftest tiger, has a
superior chance of obtaining prey; the stouter bulls of the herd defy
the attack of the wolves who overcome the resistance of the weaker
individuals; the fleetest deer has the best chance to escape the
pursuit of the hunter.