Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SEPARATION SYSTEM-PART 2
Dr. Agus Arsad
Group Working Session
• Assume volatility:
Hydrogen>methane>benzene>toluene>diphenyl
Number of Alternative Sequences for
Ordinary Distillation
Number of Number of possible
components sequences
2 1
3 2
4 5
5 14
6 42
7 132
8 429
9 1,430
10 4,862
Ns = [2(P-1)]!/P!(P-1)!
Sequencing of Distillation Columns
100-tray column
C3 & 1-Butene in
distillate
Propane and
1-Butene recovery
Pentane
withdrawn as n-C4 and 2-C4=s
bottoms cannot be
separated by
ordinary
distillation
(=1.03), so 96%
2-C4=s withdrawn as furfural is added
distillate. Furfural is as an extractive
recovered as agent ( 1.17).
bottoms and recycled n-C4 withdrawn as
to C-4 distillate.
Separation is Energy Intensive
Design a sequence of
ordinary distillation
columns to meet the
given specifications.
Class Exercise – Possible Solution
Costing as a factor of consideration
(A/B…)I, (…E/F)I, (…B/C…)I, (A/C…)I , (…C/B…)II, and (…C/D…)II
1-5-16-28 900,200
1-5-17-29 872,400
1-6-18 1,127,400
1-7-19-30 878,000
1-7-20 1,095,600
Species
Propane A
1-Butene B
n-Butane C
trans-2-Butene D
cis-2-Butene E
n-Pentane F
(A/B…)I, (…E/F)I, (…B/C…)I, (A/C…)I , (…C/B…)II, and (…C/D…)II
Species
Propane A
1-Butene B
n-Butane C
trans-2-Butene D
cis-2-Butene E
n-Pentane F
(A/B…)I, (…E/F)I, (…B/C…)I, (A/C…)I , (…C/B…)II, and (…C/D…)II
3-11-23-31 878,200
3-11-24 1,095,700
3-12-(25,26) 867,400
3-13-27 1,080,100
Species
Propane A
1-Butene B
n-Butane C
trans-2-Butene D
cis-2-Butene E
n-Pentane F
(A/B…)I, (…E/F)I, (…B/C…)I, (A/C…)I , (…C/B…)II, and (…C/D…)II
4-14-15 1,115,200
Species
Propane A
1-Butene B
n-Butane C
trans-2-Butene D
cis-2-Butene E
n-Pentane F
Lowest Cost Sequence
1 1
2 3
1 2 2 D1 + 2D2 + 3D3 + 3D4
3 3 3 4
4 4 4
2
1 1 2
3 D1 + 3D2 + 3D3 + 2D4
2 2 2 3
3 3 4
4 4
1
2 2 2D1 + 2D2 + 2D3 + 2D4
1
3 2 3
3
3 4 4
4
Most Plentiful First
Separation Sequence Total Load
1
1
2 2
1 3D1 + 3D2 + 2D3 + D4
2 3
1
3
4 2
3 4
4 1
1 2
2 2
1 3 2D1 + 3D2 + 3D3 + D4
3 3
5 2
3 4
4
Sequence Total Load
1 9D
OR, use vapour flowrate approach 2 9D
(see later) 3 8D
4 9D
5 9D
Direct Sequence
A (60)
A (60) B (60)
B (60) B
C (180) C
C (180)
= A + 2B + 2C
A (60)
A
B B (60)
A (60)
B (60)
C (180)
C (180)
1 1
2 2 D D2 D3 D4 D2 D3 D4 D3 D4
1 3
1
2 12 23 34
3
3 3
4 4
4 4
2
1 1 2
load
2 2 2 3 3
3 3 4
D D2 D3 D4 D2 D3 D2 D3 D4
1
4 4 12 23 34
1 Sep difficulty
1
1 2 2 D D2 D1 D2 D3 D4 D3 D4
1
3 2 3 12 23 34
3
3 4 4
4
Difficult Separation Last
Least Difficult 1 D D
4 9 2 (15)
2 D D
4 6 3 (13)
Most Difficult 3 D D
2 12 2 (16)
D D
4 2 9 4 (15)
D D
3 6 4 (13)
Least Difficult 5
Aim to Separate at High T,
Rather than Low T
All other things being equal, avoid
150 excursions in T and P, but aim high,
rather than low
Relative Cost/Btu
Cooling
100
Heating
50
No Component BP (0C)
1. 18% H2 -253
2. 15% CH4 -161
3. 24% C2H4 -104
4. 15% C2H6 -88
5. 14% C3H6 -48
6. 6% C3H8 -42
7. 8% heavies, C4 -1
1 1
2 3
2 3
3 4 4
3 5
4
4 5
5 5
5 6 6
6 6
6
7 7 7
7
Light Olefin Product Separation -
Lightest First -
H2,C1 C2-,C20 C2 ,
[BP°C]
18% Hydrogen; H2 [-253]
Pressurized
15% Methane; C1 [-161] columns are
24% Ethylene; C2- [-104] DM used to T
DM SP
15% Ethane; C20 [-88]
14% Propylene; C3- [-48]
6% Propane; C30 [-42]
8% Heavies; C4+ [-1] C20 C3-
C2-,C20,C3-,C30,C4+ C3-,C30
DP SP
DM = Demethanizer C3-,C30,C4+
DP = Depropanizer
SP = Splitter
C4+ C30
Limitations
Fv Q Oper
Cost
Fv Dc Capital
Cost
Favour sequence with the lowest vapour flowrate
Vapour flowrate estimation
V = D(1 + R)
Define RF = R/Rmin
V = D(1 + RFRmin) (1)
1
Vapour Flowrate Approach (2)
1 F
Rmin =
-1 D (2)
2
Vapour Flowrate Approach (3)
V=D 1 + RF F
-1 D
The table below gives the data for a ternary separation of benzene, toluene
and ethyl benzene. Using the vapour flowrate equation, determine whether
direct or indirect sequence should be used.
RF=1.1
Solution: Vapour Flowrate Approach
0
0
57
For the indirect sequence
S V = (269 + 282) + (269 + 282 + 57) 1.1 + 269 + (269 + 282) 1.1
(1.8 -1) (1.96 -1)
269
= 1387 + 900.4 0
= 2287.4 kmol/h 0
269
282 0
57 282
0 0
Hence, the direct sequence 0
should be used 57
Working Session SS1:
Separation Synthesis 1
MEA + EO NH(CH2CH2CH2OH)2
(DEA)
DEA + EO N(CH2CH2OH)3
(TEA)
Quiz 4124: Separation Synthesis 2
(cont’)
Assuming that
· EO is fully converted
· some NH3 is unconverted
· reactor effluent contains equal amount of NH3, MEA, DEA and TEA
· separation by distillation is desirable
· the boiling point order is according to NH3 << MEA << DEA << TEA
Advantages of distillation
Alternatives to Distillation
Extraction
Extractive Distillation
Azeotropic Distillation
Reactive Distillation
Crystallization
Adsorption
Reaction
Membrane Separation
Extraction
5 B
B+S C
7
3 2
B+C 6
S 1
C (+ B) 4
6 5 2
B 3 S
1
4
B+C C+S C
7
(+ B)
Refer R.E. Treybal on
the use of liquid extraction
Extractive Distillation
S B A
A+B azeotrope
C1
A+B C1
C2
B
S
S B S
C2
e.g., A = Ethanol
B = H2 O mix
S = Ethylene Glycol split
Azeotropic Distillation
ABS Ternary
heterogeneous
azeotrope
A+B
azeotrope A+B
C1 C2 azeotrope
A
A C3
B
e.g., A = Ethanol
B = H2 O B
S = Benzene
Reactive Distillation
B(meta-xylene)
S
B
C1
C
C2
C+S
C (para-xylene)
Add an entrainer to react with one component in a mixture that is
difficult to separate (e.g. xylene isomers)
B, C = meta- & para-xylenes: = 1.03
S = Organometallic, e.g. sodium cumene; C (para) reacts with S; B:CS ~ 30
Separation greatly simplified, but, problems in handling sodium cumene
Important alternative if a simpler to handle entariners can be found