An Introduction To The Finite Element Analysis: Presented by Niko Manopulo

An Introduction to the
Finite Element Analysis
Presented by
Niko Manopulo
Agenda
PART I
Introduction and Basic Concepts
1.0 Computational Methods

1.1 Idealization
1.2 Discretization
1.3 Solution
2.0 The Finite Elements Method
2.1 FEM Notation
2.2 Element Types
3.0 Mechanichal Approach
3.1 The Problem Setup
3.2 Strain Energy
3.3 External Energy
3.4 The Potential Energy Functional
Joint Advanced Student School
St.Petersburg 2005
Agenda
PART II
Mathematical Formulation
4.0 The Mathematics Behind the Method

4.1 Weighted Residual Methods
4.2 Approxiamting Functions
4.3 The Residual
4.4 Galerkin’s Method
4.5 The Weak Form
4.6 Solution Space
4.7 Linear System of Equations
4.8 Connection to the physical system

St.Petersburg 2005
Agenda
PART III
Finite Element Discretization
5.0 Finite Element Discretization

4.1 The Trial Basis
4.2 Matrix Form of the Problem
4.3 Element Stiffness Matrix
4.4 Element Mass Matrix
4.5 External Work Integral
4.6 Assembling
6.0 References
7.0 Question and Answers

St.Petersburg 2005
PART I
Introduction and Basic Concepts
1.0 Computational Methods

St.Petersburg 2005
1.1 Idealization
• Mathematical Models
• “A model is a symbolic device built to
simulate and predict aspects of behavior of
a system.”
• Abstraction of physical reality
• Implicit vs. Explicit Modelling
• Implicit modelling consists of using existent
pieces of abstraction and fitting them into
the particular situation (e.g. Using general
purpose FEM programs)
• Explicit modelling consists of building the
model from scratch
St.Petersburg 2005
1.2 Dicretization
1. Finite Difference Discretization

• The solution is discretized
• Stability Problems
• Loss of physical meaning
2. Finite Element Discretization
• The problem is discretized
• Physical meaning is conserved on elements
• Interpretation and Control is easier

St.Petersburg 2005
1.3 Solution
1. Linear System Solution Algorithms

• Gaussian Elimination
• Fast Fourier Transform
• Relaxation Techniques
2. Error Estimation and Convergence

Analysis

St.Petersburg 2005
2.0 Finite Element Method
• Two interpretations
1. Physical Interpretation:
The continous physical model is divided
into finite pieces called elements and laws
of nature are applied on the generic
element. The results are then recombined
to represent the continuum.
2. Mathematical Interpretation:
The differetional equation reppresenting the
system is converted into a variational form,
which is approximated by the linear
combination of a finite set of trial functions.
St.Petersburg 2005
2.1 FEM Notation
Elements are defined by the following

properties:
1. Dimensionality
2. Nodal Points
3. Geometry
4. Degrees of Freedom
5. Nodal Forces
(Non homogeneous RHS of the DE)
St.Petersburg 2005
2.2 Element Types

St.Petersburg 2005
3.0 Mechanical Approach
• Simple mechanical problem

• Introduction of basic mechanical concepts
• Introduction of governing equations
• Mechanical concepts used in mathematical
derivation

St.Petersburg 2005
3.1 The Problem Setup

St.Petersburg 2005
3.2 Strain Energy
• Hooke’s Law:
 ( x)  E ( x)
where
du
 ( x) 
dx
• Strain Energy Density:
1
   ( x) ( x)
2

St.Petersburg 2005
3.2 Strain Energy (cont’d)
• Integrating over the Volume of the Bar:

1 1 L 1 L
U    dV   p dx   ( EAu' )u ' dx
2 V 2 0 2 0
1 L
U   u ' EAu' dx
2 0
• All quantities may depend on x.

St.Petersburg 2005
3.3 External Energy
• Due to applied external loads

1. The distributed load q(x)
2. The point end load P. This can be
included in q.
• External Energy:
L
W   qu dx
0

St.Petersburg 2005
3.4 The Total Potential
Energy Functional
• The unknown strain Function u is found by
minimizing the TPE functional described below:
  U W
or
[u ( x)]  U [u ( x)]  W [u ( x)]

St.Petersburg 2005
PART II
Mathematical Formulation
4.0 Historical Background
• Hrennikof and McHenry formulated a 2D

structural problem as an assembly of bars
and beams
• Courant used a variational formulation to
approximate PDE’s by linear interpolation
over triangular elements
• Turner wrote a seminal paper on how to
solve one and two dimensional problems
using structural elements or triangular and
rectangular elements of continuum.
St.Petersburg 2005
The class of differential equations containing also the one

dimensional bar described above can be described as
follows :
d du
L[u ]   ( p ( x) )  z ( x)u  q ( x), 0  x 1 (1)
dx dx
u (0)  u (1)  0.

St.Petersburg 2005
It follows that:
L[u ]  q  0
Multiplying this by a weight function v and integrating over
the whole domain we obtain:
1
 (L[u]  q)v dx  (v, L[u]  q)  0
0
(2)
For the inner product to exist v must be “square integrable”
Therefore:
v  L2 (0,1)
Equation (2) is called variational form

St.Petersburg 2005
4.2 Approximating Function
• We can replace u and v in the formula with their approximation

function i.e.
N
u ( x )  U ( x )   c jf j ( x )
j 1
N
v( x)  V ( x)   d jy j ( x)
j 1
• The functions fj and yj are of our choice and are meant to be
suitable to the particular problem. For example the choice of
sine and cosine functions satisfy boundary conditions hence it
could be a good choice.

St.Petersburg 2005
4.2 Approximating Function
• U is called trial function and V is called test function

• As the differential operator L[u] is second order
u  C 2 (0,1)  U  C 2 (0,1)
• Therefore we can see U as element of a finite-diemnsional
subspace of the infinite-dimensional function space C2(0,1)
U  S N (0 ,1)  C 2 (0 ,1)
• The same way
V  Sˆ N (0 ,1)  L2 (0 ,1)

St.Petersburg 2005
4.3 The Residual
• Replacing v and u with respectively V and U (2) becomes
(V , r )  0, V  Sˆ N
r ( x)  L[U ]  q
• r(x) is called the residual (as the name of the method suggests)
• The vanishing inner product shows that the residual is orthogonal to
all functions V in the test space.

St.Petersburg 2005
4.3 The Residual
N
• Substituting V ( x)  d y
j 1
j j ( x) into (V , L[U ]  q )  0
and exchanging summations and integrals we obtain

N
 d (y
j 1
j j , L[U ]  q)  0 d j , j  1, 2 , ... , N
• As the inner product equation is satisfied for all choices of V in

SN the above equation has to be valid for all choices of dj
which implies that
(y j , L[U ]  q)  0 j  1, 2 , ... , N

St.Petersburg 2005
4.4 Galerkin’s Method
• One obvious choice of y j would be taking it equal to f j

• This Choice leads to the Galerkin’s Method
(f j , L[U ]  q)  0 j  1, 2 , ... , N
• This form of the problem is called the strong form of the

problem. Because the so chosen test space has more
continuity than necessary.
• Therefore it is worthwile for this and other reasons to convert
the problem into a more symmetrical form
• This can be acheived by integrating by parts the initial strong
form of the problem.

St.Petersburg 2005
4.5 The Weak Form
• Let us remember the initial form of the problem
d du
L[u ]   ( p ( x) )  z ( x)u  q( x), 0  x 1
dx dx
u (0)  u (1)  0.
1
(v, L[u ]  q)   v [( pu ' )' zu  q] dx
0
• Integrating by parts
1 1
 v [( pu' )' zu  q] dx   (v' pu'vzu  vq) dx  vpu' 0

1
0
0 0

St.Petersburg 2005
4.5 The Weak Form
• The problem can be rewritten as
A(v , u )  (v , q)  0
where
1
A(v , u )   (v' pu 'vzu) dx
0
• The integration by parts eliminated the second derivatives

from the problem making it possible less continouity than the
previous form. This is why this form is called weak form of the
problem.
• A(v,u) is called Strain Energy.
St.Petersburg 2005
4.6 Solution Space
• Now that derivative of v comes into the picture v needs to have more
continoutiy than those in L2. As we want to keep symmetry its
appropriate to choose functions that produce bounded values of
1
A(u , u)   ( p(u' ) 2  zu 2 ) dx
0
• As p and z are necessarily smooth functions the following restriction is
sufficient 1
 
2 2
(u ' ) u dx
0
• Functions obeying this rule belong to the so called Sobolev Space

and they are denoted by H1. We require v and u to satisfy boundary
1
conditions so we denote the resulting space as H 0

St.Petersburg 2005
• The solution now takes the form

A(v , u )  (v , q) v  H 01
• Substituting the approximate solutions obtained earlier in the
more general WRM we obtain
U ,V  S0N  H 01
A(V ,U )  (V , q) V  S0N
• More explicitly substituting U and V (remember we chose

them to have the same base) and swapping summations and
integrals we obtain
N
 c A(f
k 1
k j , fk )  (f j , q ) , j  1, 2 , ... , N

St.Petersburg 2005
4.8 Connection to the Physical System
Mechanical Formulation Mathematical Formulation
1
1 L
U   u ' EAu' dx A(v , u )   (v' pu 'vzu) dx
2 0 0
L
W   qu dx (v , q )
0
  U  W  0 A(v , u )  (v , q)  0

St.Petersburg 2005
PART III
Finite Element Discretization
5.0 Finite Element Discretization
• Let us take the initial value problem with constant coefficients
 pu ' ' zu  q( x), 0  x 1

p, z  0
u (0)  u (1)  0.
• As a first step let us divide the domain in N subintervals with

the following mesh
0  x0  x1  ...  xN  1
• Each subinterval ( x j 1 , x j ), j  1 : N is called finite element.

St.Petersburg 2005
5.1 The Trial Basis
• Next we select as a basis the so called “hat function”.

 x  x j 1
 x j 1  x  x j
 x j  x j 1
 x x
f j ( x)   j 1 x j  x  x j 1
 x j 1  x j


 0 otherwise

St.Petersburg 2005
5.1 The Trial Basis
• With the basis in the previous slide we construct our

approximate solution U(x)
• It is interesting to note that the coefficients correspond to the

values of U at the interior nodes
St.Petersburg 2005
5.1 The Trial Basis
• The problem at this point can be easily solved using the

previously derived Galerkin’s Method
 c A(f
k 1
k j , fk )  (f j , q ) , j  1, 2 , ... , N
• A little more work is needed to convert this problem into

matrix notation

St.Petersburg 2005
• Restricting U over the typical finite element we can write

U ( x)  c j 1f j 1 ( x)  c jf j ( x) x  [ x j 1 , x j ]
• Which in turn can be written as
f j 1 ( x) c j 1 
U ( x)  [c j 1 c j ]   [f j 1 ( x) f j ( x)]  x [ x j 1 , x j ]
 f j ( x)   cj 
in the same way
f j 1 ( x) d j 1 
V ( x)  [d j 1 d j ]
f ( x )   [f j 1 ( x) f j ( x)] d  x [ x j 1 , x j ]
 j   j 

St.Petersburg 2005
• Taking the derivative

 1 / h j  c j 1 
U ' ( x)  [c j 1 c j ]   [1 / h j 1 / h j ] c  x  [ x j 1 , x j ]
 1 / h j   j 
h j  x j  x j 1
• Derivative of V is analogus
 1 / h j  d j 1 
V ' ( x)  [d j 1 d j ]   [1 / h j 1 / h j ]  x [ x j 1 , x j ]
 1 / h j  d
 j 

St.Petersburg 2005
• The variational formula can be elementwise defined as

follows:
N
 [ A (V ,U )  (V , q)
j 1
j j ]0
A j (V ,U )  ASj (V , U )  AMj (V , U )
xj
A (V , U )  
S
j pV 'U ' dx
x j 1
xj
A (V ,U )  
M
j zVU dx
x j 1
xj
(V , q)   Vq dx
x j 1

St.Petersburg 2005
4.3 The Element Stiffnes Matrix
• Substituting U,V,U’ and V’ into these formulae we obtain
 x j  1 / h j   c j 1 

A (V , U )  [d j 1 d j ]  p 
S
[1 / h j 1 / h j ] dx   
j  x j1  cj
  1/ hj   
 x j p  1  1  c j 1  c j 1 

A j (V , U )  [d j 1 d j ] 
S   [d j 1 d j ]K j  
 x j1 h 2  1 1    c j 
dx
 j    cj 
p  1 1 
Kj  
h j  1  1

St.Petersburg 2005
4.4 The Element Mass Matrix
• The same way

 x j f j 1   c j 1 
A (V , U )  [d j 1 d j ]  z  [f j 1 f j ] dx   
M
j  x j1 f j  cj
    
c j 1 
A j (V , U )  [d j 1 d j ]M j  
S
 cj 
zh j 2 1 
Mj 
6 1 2

St.Petersburg 2005
4.5 External Work
Integral
• The external work integral cannot be evaluated for every
function q(x)
xj
(V , q)   Vq dx
x j 1
• We can consider a linear interpolant of q(x) for simplicity.

q( x)  q j 1f j 1 ( x)  q jf j ( x), x  [ x j 1 , x j ]
• Substituting and evaluating the integral

xj f j 1  q j 1 
(V , q) j   [d j 1 , d j ] [f j 1 , f j ]  dx  [d j 1 , d j ] l j
 fj   qj 
x j 1
h j 2q j 1  q j 
lj    Element load vector
6 q j 1  2q j 
St.Petersburg 2005
4.6 Assembling
• Now the task is to assemble the elements into the whole

system in fact we have to sum each integral over all the
elements
• For doing so we can extend the dimension of each element
matrix to N and then put the 2x2 matrix at the appropriate
position inside it
• With all matrices and vectors having the same dimension the
summation looks like
 2 1 
 c1   d1   1 2  1 
N c  d   
 j Kc
A S
 d T
c 2 
 ... 
d  2 
 ... 
p
K 
h
 1 2 1
... ... ...


j 1 
      1 2  1
 N 1 
c  N 1 
d  
  1 2 

St.Petersburg 2005
4.6 Assembling
• Doing the same for the Mass Matrix and for the Load Vector
4 1 
1 4 1 
 
zh  1 4 1 
N
 j
A M
j 1
 d T
Mc M 
6 

... ... ... 
 1 4 1
 
 1 4
 q0  4q1  q2 
 
N
h  q1  4q2  q3 
 (V
j 1
, q ) j  d T
l l
6 ... 
 
 N 2
q  4 q N 1  q N

St.Petersburg 2005
• Substituting this Matrix form of the expressions in

N
[ A (V ,U )  (V , q)
j 1
j j ]0
we obtain the following set of linear equations
dT [(K  M)c  l]  0
• This has to be satisfied for all choices of d therefore
(K  M )c  l  0

St.Petersburg 2005
References
• Carlos Felippa
http://caswww.colorado.edu/courses.d/IFEM.d/IFE
M.Ch06.d/IFEM.Ch06.pdf
• Joseph E Flaherty,Amos Eaton Professor

http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~flaherje/FEM/fem1.ps
• Gilbert Strang, George J. Fix

An Analysis of the Finite Element Method
Prentice-Hall,1973
St.Petersburg 2005

An Introduction To The Finite Element Analysis: Presented by Niko Manopulo

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

An Introduction To The Finite Element Analysis: Presented by Niko Manopulo

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

An Introduction to the

Finite Element Analysis

1.0 Computational Methods

4.0 The Mathematics Behind the Method

Joint Advanced Student School

5.0 Finite Element Discretization

Joint Advanced Student School

Joint Advanced Student School

1. Finite Difference Discretization

Joint Advanced Student School

1. Linear System Solution Algorithms

2. Error Estimation and Convergence

Joint Advanced Student School

Elements are defined by the following

Joint Advanced Student School

• Simple mechanical problem

Joint Advanced Student School

Joint Advanced Student School

Joint Advanced Student School

• Integrating over the Volume of the Bar:

Joint Advanced Student School

• Due to applied external loads

Joint Advanced Student School

Joint Advanced Student School

• Hrennikof and McHenry formulated a 2D

The class of differential equations containing also the one

Joint Advanced Student School

Joint Advanced Student School

• We can replace u and v in the formula with their approximation

Joint Advanced Student School

• U is called trial function and V is called test function

Joint Advanced Student School

• Replacing v and u with respectively V and U (2) becomes

Joint Advanced Student School

and exchanging summations and integrals we obtain

• As the inner product equation is satisfied for all choices of V in

Joint Advanced Student School

• One obvious choice of y j would be taking it equal to f j

• This form of the problem is called the strong form of the

Joint Advanced Student School

• Let us remember the initial form of the problem

 v [( pu' )' zu  q] dx   (v' pu'vzu  vq) dx  vpu' 0

Joint Advanced Student School

• The problem can be rewritten as

• The integration by parts eliminated the second derivatives

• Functions obeying this rule belong to the so called Sobolev Space

Joint Advanced Student School

• The solution now takes the form

• More explicitly substituting U and V (remember we chose

Joint Advanced Student School

Mechanical Formulation Mathematical Formulation

Joint Advanced Student School

• Let us take the initial value problem with constant coefficients

 pu ' ' zu  q( x), 0  x 1

• As a first step let us divide the domain in N subintervals with

• Each subinterval ( x j 1 , x j ), j  1 : N is called finite element.

Joint Advanced Student School

• Next we select as a basis the so called “hat function”.

Joint Advanced Student School

• With the basis in the previous slide we construct our

• It is interesting to note that the coefficients correspond to the

• The problem at this point can be easily solved using the

• A little more work is needed to convert this problem into