Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C ASE STUDY
• Tourism Policy
Positive: the divisions of responsible for the Manila zoo
Negative: the regulation to implement the development of the manila zoo
• Environmental Racism
Positive: the awareness of the community
Negative: The administrations and government’s lack of attention
Tourism Volume, Density /Ration:
The total number of animals and visitors in January- October 2017
Animals: 687 different species
Visitors: Adult 417,262 children 100,653
Positive: thousands of people visited the zoo (operated)
Negative: the issues in the situation of animals, facilities, and services affect the visitors.
Social Representation
Positive: PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals)
Negative: the criticisms against the physical and architectural landscape.
ANALYSIS
STRENGTH
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
CURRENT
CURRENT
PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL
STRENGTH WEAKNESSES
• Manila Zoo is one of the most • Poor maintenance.
famous zoos in the country. • There are only few animals left.
• The place has a botanical garden that • Some areas are not occupied but are only
showcases many species of plants. inhabited by shrubs alone.
• It offers playgrounds for children & • Lack of seats & roofed areas in case of rain.
kids at heart. • He animals don’t seem so happy in the place.
• It holds the title as the first ever zoo • The ponds & lakes are not so appealing to the
in Asia. eyes.
• It is known to be a destination for • There is no personnel to assist the tourists &
school field trips of nearby guests.
institutions & other schools in the • There are no breeding facilities for the
country. animals.
• Aside from its elephant, it also • Poor activities for entertainment.
houses rare animals.
• Signages are directions for the tour & where
• Manila Zoo has a wide area to go are not available.
THREATS OPPORTUNITIES
• Lack of budget to support the development • The city of Manila plans to renovate &
of the zoo. beautify the place.
• In case Singapore helps in the modernization • Singapore plans to invest $2B in renovating
of the place, the country will not be holding & the modernization of the zoo.
100% ownership & rights for the place.
• The Philippine government still have hopes
• Minimal means of advertisements. to modernize the place.
• The children these days are starting to lose • The city office of Manila continuously
interest in wildlife appreciation. supports the zoo.
• PETA protests to close down the zoo. • The vicinity of the zoo has many possible
• It can be means of giving a bad impression to areas to build better & more functional
the country’s tourism industry facilities for animals.
• Based on our observation we find
the zoo’s facility as poor in terms
of quality. It simply implies that the
zoo really needs to upgrade its
facilities & equipment. It was been
criticized due to its inadequate
CONCLUSION
animal care & dirty surroundings
so that the zoo was responding &
having their efforts to make those
animals comfortable & also their
cages should be clean & widen &
make their surroundings also
clean.
THANK YOU!