Coordinating Ministry

for Economic Affairs

Republic of Indonesia

Database Sharing Meeting

JABODETABEK Urban Transportation Policy Integration
(JUTPI) Phase 2

29 July 2020
ALMEC Corporation

1
Outline of Data Request

1. Recent Transportation Policy in JABODETABEK

2. Traffic Volume in JABODETABEK
3. Socioeconomic and Demographic
4. Public Transportation Passenger and Inspection System
5. Situation of Public Transport use in other Cities*
6. New Mobility Services by Domestic and Foreign
Companies*
7. Public/Open Source Data and Promotion of Smart City by
Indonesian Government*
* In principle, this is not JUTPI2 scope of work

2
Recent Transportation Policy in
JABODETABEK

3
Freight (Truck) Transport Policy
Existing Regulations:

1. Transportation Ministerial
Decree No. 18 year of 2018:
“Adjusted Freight Regulation
Related to the Ongoing
Construction of Cikampek
Toll Road phase II (Elevated
Toll).”

2. Transportation Ministerial
Decree No. 36 year of 2018:
“Toll Traffic Regulation in
Tangerang, Merak, Jakarta,
and Bogor”.

3. DKI Jakarta Governor

Decree No. 5148/1999:
“Truck Ban in DKI Jakarta”

2018 2024 2030 2035

4
Traffic Demand Management – Odd/Even Vehicle Plate Number Policy

• Replacing the former 3-in-1

policy in DKI Jakarta

• It is aimed to ease Jakarta’s

notorious traffic congestion by
restricting access to selected
roads to vehicles with odd-
numbered license plates on odd-
numbered dates and to ones
with even-numbered plates on
even-numbered dates

• Authorized by BPTJ (Greater

Jakarta Transportation Authority)

5
 Traffic Demand Management – Odd/Even Vehicle Plate Number Policy

1. The timeline
Additional at JUTPI 2 ASIAN GAMES JUTPI 2
End of Start of Cikampek Survey (Para ASIAN Further Survey
3-in-1 Odd-Even Main Toll Access GAMES) Application
2016

2019
2018

FEB MAY JUL OCT DEC

• 7.00 – 10.00 • 06.00 – 09.00 • 06.00 – 21.00 • 06.00 – 10.00 Contd.

• 16.00 – 20.00 • Weekdays 91 locations • 7 days • 16.00 – 20.00 26 locations
• Weekdays • Other sections Weekdays • Additional • Weekdays Weekdays
remain 16 and 24 hrs. sections • Additional 16 hrs.
sections remain

2. Daily Traffic Impact (Comparison of JUTPI 2 Surveys)

Odd/Even Road 5% 22% 14% 25% 8%

Access to 29%
10% 8% 23% 5%
Odd/Even Road

NON-Access to 41%
8% 1% 79% 1%
Odd/Even Road
6
Other Transportation Policies

• Instruction from the President during the Limited Cabinet Meeting on

8th January 2019:
Transportation planning authority should be under the same authority for
intermodal integration, transportation and spatial integration, traffic
demand management

• Governor Instruction of DKI Jakarta (No.66/2019)

Setup of vehicle age limitation of 10 years since it is produced – to be fully
applied in target year of 2025

• COVID-19 Transportation Policies Countermeasures

o Revoke Odd/Even Vehicle Plate Number Policy
o Limitation of Public Transport Service Frequency and Capacity
 Applied for train, bus, airplane, and online-based service (i.e. Grab, Gojek)

7
Traffic Volume in JABODETABEK

8
Screenline Survey – Traffic Counting

North-South Screenline
East-West Screenline

Screenline survey 2002 2018 Screenline survey 2002 2018

Private (000) 1,911 3,635 Private (000) 2,865 6,631
Person Person
Trips Public (000) 1,405 412 Trips Public (000) 2,371 741
North-South Trips West-East Trips
Public Share 42.4% 10.2% Public Share 45.3% 10.1%
Screenline Screenline
Private (000) 942 1,374 Private (000) 1,355 2,502
(16 hours) (16 hours)
PCU Public (000) 136 66 PCU Public (000) 207 109
Public Share 12.6% 4.6% Public Share 13.2% 4.2%
*) Year 2018 total is only for location consistent with 2002 traffic counts and new road
**) Not included rail based public transport
9
10
Present Case Private Vehicle Assignment Result (DKI Jakarta)
Socioeconomic and Demographic

12
 Existing Population Condition of JABODETABEK

Jabodetabek Population 2017

75+ Age
Male Female Total Percentage Sex Ratio
70-74 Group
65-69 0-4 1,591,605 1,527,701 3,119,306 9.42% 104
60-64 5-9 1,517,897 1,449,789 2,967,686 8.96% 105
55-59 10-14 1,331,091 1,266,332 2,597,423 7.84% 105
50-54 15-19 1,335,703 1,334,811 2,670,514 8.06% 100
45-49 20-24 1,475,111 1,507,893 2,983,004 9.00% 98
40-44 25-29 1,563,403 1,573,938 3,137,341 9.47% 99
35-39
30-34 1,574,851 1,552,635 3,127,486 9.44% 101
35-39 1,479,082 1,441,795 2,920,877 8.82% 103
30-34
40-44 1,315,490 1,241,440 2,556,930 7.72% 106
25-29
45-49 1,089,547 1,019,323 2,108,870 6.37% 107
20-24
50-54 860,963 812,548 1,673,511 5.05% 106
15-19
55-59 645,533 610,351 1,255,884 3.79% 106
10-14 60-64 439,997 410,141 850,138 2.57% 107
5-9 65-69 265,994 261,690 527,684 1.59% 102
0-4 70-74 153,857 170,298 324,155 0.98% 90
2,000,000 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 75+ 131,803 177,470 309,273 0.93% 74
TOTAL 16,771,927 16,358,155 33,130,082 100% 103
Male Female

Source: Proyeksi Penduduk Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi
DKI Jakarta, Jawa Barat, Banten, 2010 - 2020, BPS-
UNFPA 2015
 Dependency Ratio 42,2 % (For every 100 person productive
age have to dependents 42 non-productive age)
 Sex Ratio :
 In productive age group 20 – 29 number of female higher
compare to male population
 Non productive age group 70 – 75+ indicate female
population have higher life expectancy compare to male
population
Age Pyramid in 2018

75+ 75+
70-74 70-74
65-69 65-69
60-64 60-64
55-59 55-59
50-54 50-54
45-49 45-49
40-44 40-44
35-39 35-39
30-34 30-34
25-29 25-29
20-24 20-24
15-19 15-19
10-14 10-14
5-9 5-9
0-4 0-4
2,000,000 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 200,000 400,000 600,000

Male Female Male Female

Source: BPS Source: BOS
JABODETABEK DKI JAKARTA
Changing of Household Income Distribution in
JABODETABEK
SITRAMP (2002)-Avg. Income: IDR1.30
Mill /month
INCOME GROUP:
Low : < Rp 1,000,000
Middle : Rp 1,000,000 – Rp 4,000,000
High : > Rp 4,000,000
JUTPI 1 (2010) - Avg. Income: IDR 2.75
Mill /month
INCOME GROUP:
Low : < Rp 1,500,000
Middle : Rp 1,500,000 – Rp 6,000,000
High : > Rp 6,000,000
JUTPI 2 (2018) Avg. Income: IDR 6.15
Mill /month
INCOME GROUP:
Source: JUTPI 2 Low : < Rp 4,000,000
Middle : Rp 4,000,000 – Rp 10,000,000
High : > Rp 10,000,000

• Average income has increased around 5 times compare to

2002 with IDR 6.15 million/month in 2018.
• Most households is categorized in middle-income group.
 Household Income Ratio by Kota/Kabupaten

Kota Tangerang Selatan 32% 52% 16%

Kota Tangerang 36% 56% 8%

Kab. Tangerang 38% 55% 6%

Kota Depok 37% 55% 8%

Kota Bekasi 28% 58% 14%

Kota Bogor 52% 43% 5%

Kabupaten Bekasi 36% 59% 5%

Kabupaten Bogor 59% 39% 2%

DKI Jakarta 30% 55% 15%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Low-Income Middle-Income High-Income

Source: JUTPI 2

• The largest share of low-income household is Kabupaten Bogor

• Middle-income households is the largest in Kabupaten Bekasi
• High-income household is mostly in Kota Tangerang Selatan and DKI
Jakarta
 Mode Share in JABODETABEK

• Private vehicle share has

SITRAMP
(2002)
8.7 13.1 32.8 2.9 40.3 been rocketing and now
1.3
dominating the mode
1.8
JUTPI 1
8.6 41.2 17.1 29.9
share of JABODETABEK
(2010)
• The share of public
2.4 2.6 transport is drastically
JUTPI 2
(2018)
12.0 62.8 17.0
decreasing over the years
1.4

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Private Car Motorcycle Bus TransJakarta Train Ojek Taxi, Bajaj NMT Other

• Trend of mode share in 1.8

DKI Jakarta and DKI JAKARTA 15.0 75.1 4.2

BODETABEK is similar. 1.9
• The share of ojek in DKI
Jakarta dominates share 2.5

of public transport. BODETABEK 14.3 76.2 3.4

• Conventional bus has the 2.1

largest share among 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

public transport in Private Car Motorcycle Bus TransJakarta Train Ojek Taxi, Bajaj

Bodetabek
 Mode Share: Home-based School

• Trend of mode share is different by each Kota/Kabupaten

• Share of motorcycle is substantial in Kabupaten Bekasi
• Ojek is the most common public transport in DKI Jakarta and Bekasi while people in
Kabupaten Bekasi are using BRT and bus.
 Mode Share: Home-based School

• Trend of mode share is different by each Kota/Kabupaten

• Share of motorcycle is substantial in Kota Depok
• Bus, Transjakarta, and Train are the common public transport in Kota Bogor and Kabupaten Bogor.
 Mode Share: Home-based School

• Trend of mode share is similar by each Kota/Kabupaten based on ADS MEILI

• Share of motorcycle is substantial in Kota Tangerang, Kabupaten Tangerang, and
Kota Tangerang Selatan.
• Ojek is the most frequently used public transport in Kota Tangerang Selatan.
 Mode Share: Home-based Work

• Trend of mode share is similar by each Kota/Kabupaten.

• Share of private car is proportional in all Kota/Kabupaten.
• Non-motorized transport is observed in all Kota/Kabupaten.
 Mode Share: Home-based Work

• Trend of mode share is similar by each Kota/Kabupaten.

• Share of private car is proportional in all Kota/Kabupaten.
• Bus is the most frequent public transport in Kota Bogor while some people chose
NMT in all Kota/Kabupaten.
 Mode Share: Home-based Work

• Trend of mode share is different in all Kota/Kabupaten.

• Share of motorcycle is significant in Kota Tangerang and Kota Tangerang Selatan.
• Bus, train and Transjakarta are common public transport used by people in Kota
Tangerang .
Public Transportation Passenger
and Inspection System

24
 Mode Share – Trend Over the Years

Trend of Private Mode (Car and Motorcycle)

% PRIVATE CAR TREND  Private car trend shows rather
35.0
30.0 31.5 stable trend since 2002 up to 2010
25.0
23.0
and increase after 2010.
20.0 18.8
15.0 14.7
18.6
15.0  Compared to private car,
14.7
10.0
7.4 8.6
motorcycle share has been
5.0
0.0
6.5 rocketing over the years for both
SITRAMP
(2002)
JUTPI 1
(2010)
JUTPI 2
(2018)
purposes (work and school).
Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based It may be caused by:
• simple motorcycle purchase
% MOTORCYCLE TREND scheme and affordable price
100.0 (i.e. low advance payment, low OM cost
77.4 77.5
80.0
and long-period of instalment)
61.2 78.6
60.0 69.1 • “consideration” of convenience
40.0 27.5 53.1 (i.e. high travel time – thread through
26.1 ability)
20.0 22.2
0.0 9.8
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
(2002) (2010) (2018)

Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based
25
 Mode Share - Trend Over the Years

Trend of Public Transport (PT)* *Public Transport (PT) : Conventional Bus, TransJakarta, Commuterline (Train), Ojek, Taxi, Bajaj

% PUBLIC TRANSPORT TREND

100.0
82.9
80.0
59.0
60.0 57.7
40.4
40.0 42.4
12.8
20.0 24.0 7.9
7.6
0.0 3.8
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
(2002) (2010) (2018)

Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based

Public Transport use shows decreasing trend over the years, below summary will be explained in
the following slides;
 Conventional bus (and angkot) suffer the most caused by significant shift of passenger to BRT
TransJakarta that started in operation in 2004.
 While TransJakarta is saturated and slowed the corridor expansion down since around after
2011, the passenger shifted to ojek and (back to) the commuter train.
 Along with the significant service improvement, commuter train started regaining passenger from
2011.
On a high note
26
Ojek is included as Public Transportation in this analysis for its signature impacted of existence.
 Mode Share – Trend Over the Years

Trend of Taxi and Bajaj

% TAXI, BAJAJ TREND
3.0 2.9
2.5
2.0 1.8
1.5 1.4
1.0 0.6
0.7 0.5
0.5 0.3
0.1 0.3
0.0 0.1
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
(2002) (2010) (2018)

Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based

 In 2018, ratio of online taxi to all taxi/bajaj is about 93%. Why?

Convenience of online taxi: direct order/communication, designated tariff with appealing promo.
 Service accessibility:
• Conventional taxi is limited to urban area
• Bajaj is limited to sub-urban area (within DKI Jakarta)
• Online taxi is point-to-point service throughout Jabodetabek. 27
 Mode Share - Trend Over the Years

Trend of Ojek
% OJEK TREND
8.0
6.6
5.9
6.0
5.3 5.3
4.0
3.6 2.5
2.0 2.2 2.5
1.6
1.2
0.0
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
(2002) (2010) (2018)

Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based

 In 2018, ratio of online ojek to all ojek is about 97%. Why?

Convenience of online ojek: direct order/communication, designated tariff (clear price) with appealing promo,
consideration of security and safety (i.e. helmet and mask for passenger, online official driver’s ID).
 Service accessibility:
• Conventional ojek is limited/pooled at limited locations
• Online ojek is point-to-point service throughout Jabodetabek  also available for goods movement 28
 29
Mode Share - Trend Over the Years

Trend of Conventional Bus and Train

% CONVENTIONAL BUS TREND  Conventional bus share for both
100.0
80.0
75.2 purposes (work and school) shows
60.0 49.6 continuously decreasing trend
49.4 32.6
40.0 36.2 Reasons:
20.0
20.8 3.6 1.8 • fleet limitation caused by the bus
1.8
0.0
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
0.2 reorganization towards BRT
(2002) (2010) (2018) expansion routes.
Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based • BRT’s level of service surpasses that
of the conventional bus.
% TRAIN, COMMUTERLINE TREND  Train share shows turning point from
4.0
3.1 decrease to increase around 2010 to
3.0
2.3 2014 (the period of significant
2.0 1.6
1.4
1.7
1.7
improvement of commuter train).
Despite the increasing trend, commuter
1.3
1.0 1.1 1.4

0.0
0.8
train service may have reached the
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
(2002) (2010) (2018) saturation point nowadays.
Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based

29
 Changing Situation of Mass Transit Corridor

BRT TransJakarta
TransJakarta Passenger (Yearly) % TRANSJAKARTA TREND
350 4.0
3.0
300 Corridor Expansions: 2004: I 2010: I – X 1.9
2.0
250
2006: I – III 2013: I – XII 0.7
1.0 1.0
2007: I – VII 2017: I – XIII
pax (million)

0.5
200 0.0
JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
(2010) 2018
150 123.7 114.2 126.4
114.8 111.3 112.5 111.6
103.0 Home Based Work Home Based School
86.9
100 74.6 82.4
61.4
50 38.8
15.9 20.8  Increasing trend of TransJakarta
-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 use from 2010 to 2018
Source: Statistik Transportasi Provinsi DKI Jakarta 2009-2018, BPS

 The highest growth of passengers occurred in 2011

(a year after corridor expansion of VIII – X).
 Despite the corridor expansion, the number of
TransJakarta passengers has no longer increased
caused by the service saturation and notable
competition to improved commuter line.

Concept of Passenger Demand and Mode Selection – will be discussed later 30

 Changing Situation of Mass Transit Corridor

Train, Commuter Train

Commuterline Passenger (Yearly)

% TRAIN, COMMUTERLINE TREND 350 320
315.8
4.0
3.1 300 280.6
3.0 257.5
2.3
250

pax (million)
2.0 1.6
1.4
1.7 208.5
1.7 200
1.3
1.0 1.1 1.4 158.5
0.8 150 130.5 124.3 121.1 134.1
0.0 118.1 125.5
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2 104.4
(2002) (2010) (2018) 100
Home Based Work Home Based School
Home Based Other Non-Home Based
50

0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

 The decreasing trend of train mode Source: BPS, PT. KCI

share from 2002 to 2010 may be
 The highest growth of passengers occurred in 2014 (with
caused by significant rivalry by BRT
improvement of e-ticket integration to local banks, improvement
and motorcycle while train’s level of of train facilities, and station revitalization).
service remained the same (low).

 Increasing trend after 2010 may be caused by significant service improvement (average increase of
about 11% per year).

31
Emission Regulation
Regulation by Governent of Indonesia
Law No. 22 Year 2009 about Traffic and Road Transportation
Article 53, periodical testing includes inspection and physical testing, and ratification of test results.
Article 54, roadworthiness of the commercial vehicle, which are motor vehicle exhaust emissions,
noise level, main brake ability, hand brake ability, front wheel hub, ability to emit and direct the main
beam, accuracy of speedometer, tire tread thickness.

Regulation in DKI Jakarta

Governor Regulation No. 31/2008, the regulation sets emissions thresholds for every type of
vehicle, according to fuel type and the year of production

32
Emission in Jabodetabek

MAIN SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTION

Sources SO2 NOx PM10 VOC(HC) CO

Power Plant 41,938 17,921 2,190 694 2,064
Industrial 3,873 2,348 1.042 25,762 29,180
Residential 218 840 33 34 223
Transportation 6,323 108,617 10,339 219,277 1,153,155
TOTAL 52,352 129,726 13,604 245,767 1,184,622
Unit : ton/year Source: Mungkasa, Oswar M, Deputy Governor of Jakarta for
Spatial Planning and Environment in Air Quality Management
Policy Exchange Workshop, Taipei (2018)

• Transportation is the major contributor of air pollutants

NOx (84%), PM10 (76%), Hydrocarbons (89%), and
Carbon monoxide (90%)

• Power Plant is the main contributor of SO2 (80%)

33
Emission Analysis in Jabodetabek
* Emission model : MOBILE6
 Developed by the Environmental Protection Agency.
 Estimates emission rates for each pollutant in terms of grams per mile, i.e.
grams emitted per vehicle mile travelled (VMT).
 Total emissions are calculated by multiplying emission factors by total VMT.
 5 Major pollutants are forecasted : PM10, CO2, CO, NOx, VOC(HC)

* Model Inputs
The emission factors in the MOBILE model are based upon assumptions about how
different factors affect vehicle emissions.
MOBILE6 takes as input distribution of VMT by vehicle type, road type, predefined
speed range and number of engines start per day which can be obtained from
transportation network output.
Vehicle types are classified by 6 vehicle types : passenger car, motorcycles, pick-
up, small truck, medium truck, large truck, transit and urban bus

34
Emission Model Results Using MOBILE6 in Jabodetabek
Master Plan case Do Minimum case
CO2 CO2
CO2, CO and VOC Emission CO2, CO and VOC Emission
CO CO
0.84 0.91
VOC Y2035 1.55
VOC
Y2035 0.76
0.22 0.44

0.88 0.91
Y2029 0.87 Y2029 1.31
0.24 0.37

0.91 0.67
Y2024 0.98 Y2024 1.73
0.27 0.59

0.72 0.72
Y2018 1.09 Y2018 1.09
0.34 0.34
Unit : kg/day/person Unit : kg/day/person
0.0000 0.5000 1.0000 1.5000 2.0000 0.0000 0.5000 1.0000 1.5000 2.0000

NOx Emission
NOx and PM10 Emission
2.78E-04
3.51E-04 Y2035
Y2035 3.18E-03
2.59E-03

2.80E-04
3.90E-04 Y2029
Y2029 3.35E-03
2.96E-03

4.22E-04 3.00E-04
Y2024 Y2024
3.35E-03 4.21E-03

2.63E-04 2.63E-04
Y2018 Y2018
3.95E-03 3.95E-03

0.0000 0.0010 0.0020 0.0030 0.0040 0.0050 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 0.0035 0.0040 0.0045
Unit : kg/day/person Unit : kg/day/person 35
Situation of Public Transport use
in other Cities*

36
Surabaya

• High mode share of private motorized trips (predominantly motorcycle)

relative to per capita incomes, even though average trip distances “as
the crow flies” are extremely short.
• BPS studies mentioned that there are additional 526.021 from 2009 to
2015
• Nonmotorized trips are nonetheless a critical part of the transportation
system, while collective forms of transport are much less important than
in other regional cities of similar income and density.
• TOD Development
• The studies never been made until now.

37
Bandung

• Medium Term of Regional Development (RPJMD) Kota Bandung 2019

– 2023 aims to increase public transportation users to 25% on 2023.
• Dominates by ‘Angkot’ intra and inter Kota Bandung
• TOD Development
• Regulation related TOD is stated in Regional Regulation No.18/2011 related
to development of transportation network to support TOD development, which
are mixed use area within radius 600 m
• Type of TOD has not developed yet
• The Government of Kota Bandung explained in January 2016, that TOD
location in corridor II LRT (Cimindi – Genebage) which connects with Jakarta
– Bandung High Speed Train.

38
Bali

• Bali is one of the famous tourist destination in Indonesia. Unfortunately, The

cities in Bali have not been served well by public transport services. For
tourist, they are mostly rent a private car or motorcycle for getting around.
• Public transportation in Bali are:
• Bemo or ‘Angkot’.
It is time-consuming and inconvenient. Locals prefers motorcycle than use
a bemo.
• Trans-Sarbagita,
Bali's public bus service has four routes that converge on the central
parking area just south of Istana Kuta Galleria. Destinations include
Denpasar, Sanur, Jimbaran and Nusa Dua.
• Public Bus particularly on routes linking Denpasar, Singaraja and
Gilimanuk. There are long delays waiting for buses to fill up the passengers
at terminals before departing.

Bemo Trans-Sarbagita
39
Bali
Number of Motorcycle (Unit)
Kabupaten/Kota
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Kab. Jembrana 78.397 113.662 124.698 136.189 149.065 159.167 167.568 174.505 182.346 194.524
Kab. Tabanan 153.283 230.923 250.104 270.428 290.881 309.860 325.175 338.313 353.638 373.516
Kab. Badung 286.651 370.620 384.742 329.131 562.951 605.067 641.448 675.633 716.307 761.133
Kab. Gianyar 154.264 232.932 254.031 276.770 300.265 322.801 341.280 358.032 378.049 399.845
Kab. Klungkung 46.427 59.099 70.438 77.945 86.282 93.701 100.277 106.478 113.213 125.203
Kab. Bangli 37.701 58.517 63.979 70.007 75.789 81.941 87.484 92.728 98.529 109.191
Kab. Karangasem 67.342 83.111 98.721 110.487 124.464 136.279 146.791 157.055 168.654 189.209
Kab. Buleleng 148.191 230.019 252.184 277.413 305.607 328.697 348.494 366.391 387.154 411.191
Kota Denpasar 477.023 775.685 875.707 1.038.345 915.888 977.774 1.026.430 1.068.191 1.118.525 1.174.991
Provinsi Bali 1.449.279 2.154.568 2.374.604 2.586.715 2.811.192 3.015.287 3.184.947 3.337.326 3.516.415 3.738.803
Source: Badan Pusat Statistik

Total Vehicle based on Type(Unit)

Vehicle Type
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Bus 3.731 5.605 5.983 6.533 7.090 7.532 7.791 8.223 8.643 9.142
Truck 65.754 88.843 101.509 113.937 123.609 132.773 138.297 142.780 148.238 154.412
Motorcycle 1.449.279 2.154.568 2.374.604 2.586.715 2.811.192 3.015.287 3.184.947 3.337.326 3.516.415 3.738.803
Car/others 196.911 245.462 267.068 296.503 326.221 350.392 372.007 396.710 422.868 450.239
Total 1.715.675 2.494.478 2.749.164 3.003.688 3.268.112 3.505.984 3.725.392 3.907.094 4.117.949 4.352.596
Source: Badan Pusat Statistik

40
New Mobility Services by
Domestic and Foreign
Companies*

41
 Mode Share – Trend Over the Years

Trend of Taxi and Bajaj

% TAXI, BAJAJ TREND
3.0 2.9
2.5
2.0 1.8
1.5 1.4
1.0 0.6
0.7 0.5
0.5 0.3
0.1 0.3
0.0 0.1
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
(2002) (2010) (2018)

Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based

 In 2018, ratio of online taxi to all taxi/bajaj is about 93%. Why?

Convenience of online taxi: direct order/communication, designated tariff with appealing promo.
 Service accessibility:
• Conventional taxi is limited to urban area
• Bajaj is limited to sub-urban area (within DKI Jakarta)
• Online taxi is point-to-point service throughout Jabodetabek. 42
 Mode Share - Trend Over the Years

Trend of Ojek
% OJEK TREND
8.0
6.6
5.9
6.0
5.3 5.3
4.0
3.6 2.5
2.0 2.2 2.5
1.6
1.2
0.0
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2
(2002) (2010) (2018)

Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other Non-Home Based

 In 2018, ratio of online ojek to all ojek is about 97%. Why?

Convenience of online ojek: direct order/communication, designated tariff (clear price) with appealing promo,
consideration of security and safety (i.e. helmet and mask for passenger, online official driver’s ID).
 Service accessibility:
• Conventional ojek is limited/pooled at limited locations
• Online ojek is point-to-point service throughout Jabodetabek  also available for goods movement 43
 Mode Share - Historical Data

 SITRAMP – JUTPI 1 – ADS (Taxi)

Taxi Share by Trip Purpose
100%

80% 37.0
44.8
54.1
60% 79.8 11.7
13.3
40%

45.9 51.2
20% 41.9 0.7
19.5
0%
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2 (MEILI) JUTPI 2 (PB)
2002 2010 2018 2018

Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other

 Latest Trend of Conventional Taxi (7.2%) : Online Taxi (92.8%) – ADS result
 Online taxi provides more convenience to the user: direct communication to the
driver, clear and fixed tariff, appealing promo.
 Service coverage area: Conventional taxi is more accessible in urban area while
online taxi is spread throughout regions.
44
 Mode Share - Historical Data

 SITRAMP – JUTPI 1 – ADS (Ojek)

Ojek Share by Trip Purpose

100%

29.1
80% 43.9
60.4
68.2
60% 19.6

40% 27.0
12.1
51.4
20%
29.1 31.8 27.5
0%
SITRAMP JUTPI 1 JUTPI 2 (MEILI) JUTPI 2 (PB)
2002 2010 2018 2018

Home Based Work Home Based School Home Based Other

 Latest trend of Conventional Ojek (13.4%) : Online Ojek (86.6%) – ADS result
 Online ojek provided more convenience to the user: direct communication to the driver, clear and fixed tariff,
appealing promo, minimum standard of security, safety, and convenience (availability of helmet, mask,
officially registered ID of the driver).
 Service coverage area: Conventional ojek pool location is limited in specific area while online ojek has
flexible pickup location (point-to-point) service.
45
Public/Open Source Data and
Promotion of Smart City by
Indonesian Government*

46
 One Data Indonesia
• An integrated website for
Indonesian Data:
https://data.go.id/
• Linked to ministerial offices,
provincial and kota/Kabupaten
level of government Source: https://data.go.id/
Website Display
• Data is sorted by institution,
year, and available in format of
csv, xls, pdf, and doc.

Source: https://data.go.id/
Population projection as a displayed information
 Jakarta Smart City Application
• Website: https://smartcity.jakarta.go.id/
• Objective: In smart city, all public data is
presented transparently to give some
beneficials
• Increases citizens involvement,
• Creating data and applications,
• Giving suggestions and critics.
• Concept of smart city Features:
1. Smart people • Application that involves the society
2. Smart economy • Digitizing data and integrate it to
smart city hub
3. Smart mobility
• Monitoring some issues such as
4. Smart environment flood, dump truck, heavy machines.
5. Smart living • Collaboration with third party (IT
provider, start up)
6. Smart government

Implementation in the government:

Smart Governance  Communication and Informatics Agency 
Jakarta Smart City
 Jakarta Open Data
• Website:
• Jakarta.go.id (official website of DKI Jakarta)
• https://data.jakarta.go.id/

• Consists of datasets from 53 ± agencies

(Transportation Agency, Educational
Agency, Public Works)
• Integrated and linked to some key
agencies
Source: https://data.jakarta.go.id/
• Featuring data related to:
• Education
• Heath
• Regional Fiscal
• Demography
• Transportation
• Environment
• Tourism
• Social
• Public works Source: jakarta.go.id
• Disaster Mitigation
• Displaying some useful information
related to the society
Sample of Smart City Promotion:
TOD Development of Dukuh Atas

• Dukuh Atas as the priority for development of TOD area based on

Urban Design Guidelines [UDGL], which provides complex mass
transportation such as Transjakarta, Commuter Line, Mass Rapid
Transit [MRT] Fase I, Light Rapid Transit [LRT] Fase 1A, dan Soekarno-
Hatta Airport Train.
• PT Moda Integrasi Transportasi Jabodetabek as a joint venture
between PT. KAI and PT. MRTJ will maintain and operate 72 stations,
including Airport Train and Commuter Line

50